RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Puremexican

Puremexican
I hereby nominate Puremexican for adminship. I truely believe that he deserves this award of adminship. First, of all he made so many detailed edits and devotes his heart to the wiki. He even surpassed me; (It makes me look very lazy compared to him =. Next, he is there when you need him. He would never vandalize the wiki , I know him pretty well; he is very trustworthy. Next , he has a sense of humor. It relates to this, because he can cheer the wiki up =). Good luck Puremexican and I hope you get adminship. 23:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

''I, Puremexican, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban.'' Signed, Puremexican.

Discussion

 * Extremely Strongly Support - I truely believe that he deserves this award of adminship. First, of all he made so many detailed edits and devotes his heart to the wiki. He even surpassed me; (It makes me look very lazy compared to him =. Next, he is there when you need him. He would never vandalize the wiki , I know him pretty well; he is very trustworthy. Next , he has a sense of humor. It relates to this, because he can cheer the wiki up =). Good luck Puremexican and I hope you get adminship.  23:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 23:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Good user but hasn't been here that long and about 260 main edits. Maybe if you get 350 and just a little longer, although I have nothing against you. Great user, it's just the edits and time. Oh and good luck. 00:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment - He is always on the lookout for vandalism :p forgot that to my speech. --Mr Pker 00:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutral per Ilyas. I seriously would've almost said close to the exact same thing Ilyas had said, if Ilyas hadn't has said it before me. 00:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

comment I would ask of you all to be as harsh as possible, because I love constructive critizism and I would like to know how to improve. , 00:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Support - Although Puremexican hasn't been here that long, he's shown dedication and contributed significantly to the wiki. He's reported vandalism to me on a few occasions and reverted it himself on others. He's also very active on the wiki and RS, and I believe he will make good use of sysop powers. 01:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Support - Very active, and very helpful. =)

Support He seems like a pretty good guy. Why not. Armored One 22:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Not yet' - I've given it some thought, and I don't think you're deserving yet'' (emphasis on "yet"). Perhaps in the future, with a couple hundred more edits, I'll support. I do, though, think you receiving rollback abilities would be a good choice of action if you do not receive adminship. 23:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Support - Can use his valuable help. Chrislee33 00:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Since when does adding some images to the wiki make someone worthy of adminship? I think everyone's getting cocky here and basically, wanting to sysop "anyone with a keyboard" (there's that phrase again). Nothing against Puremexican, but he hasn't been here long enough to really show he'd use it, doesn't report vandalism, doesn't undo edits, so right there wouldn't use blocking or reverting... I just don't see the point. Christine Talk 23:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment I report vandalism when I can although I try to revert the pages before I report it. And by the time i revert it some administrator such as skill, (using him as an example) has already blocked said vandal. , 23:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)