User talk:Psycho Robot

Begone!

Spam
GF talk page. 05:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * STFU LOL 05:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Just cause I "pwned" your talk page? Yea yea. :D 05:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Now I understand your signature 05:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Soo who wants a cookie? http://s693.photobucket.com/albums/vv293/Man_tag1/cookie.jpg 05:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I does...  06:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * http://s693.photobucket.com/albums/vv293/Man_tag1/cookie-monster3-7769871237963363.jpg Sorry  06:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You mock me! 06:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Real quick format question
Mmk. There's two ways for the border: HAI HAI As for the text colour, thats a pain. The wikilinks override any colour changes from the div, so you'd have to do the following: If you want these thingies ☼ green too, then its easier - put style="color:green;" into the div tag (e.g.  or   depending on choice - Doing this alone won't change the colour of the links).
 * Instead of  put   (2px is the thickness, solid is the style and green is the colour). This method creates a border that goes the whole page width, like this:
 * Instead of  put   and instead of   put   (gain, 2px is width, solid is style and green is colour). This method creates a border that only goes around the words (like a signature), like this (here I've put   around it to create a space, and incidentally  doesn't like showing outside of editing):
 * Replace  with   (once more, green is the colour you want). You'll have do this to all the links.

(A lot of this based on H:CYS.) Hope I didn't fry your brain too much with the code  12:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Anytime  19:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:Plague quest series
Here you go. Use it as needed. :)-- 19:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Well it appears someone beat me to it! 00:09, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Halp with vandal!
Thanks, I gave him a quick warning. Let me know if he continues. 19:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:Images and Media Policy
That should do just fine.-- 21:53, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Lol
Lol! Lol? Lol. Gaz Lol 21:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

My Signature
Thank you. Turns out all that was missing in the "code" in my Preferences was the "Nosubst" part. 11:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for helping me with my signature thingy. It used to be right and then went weird... Thanks though!

RE:Nooo
Sorry, I just hate people who think AGS is all that. All Godswords have the same high alch value, but this IP mentions AGS as having the highest alch price of the other three. Grr... 03:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Re
Spam 06:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

RE:Whip
The history had the old old whip color and I'm sure that nothing else has that picture. I kinda got lazy and didn't revert the picture to the old old whip color when I added the historical image tag. :| 02:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Go check recent changes then. :P 02:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Template halp!
Hello! You can create a template with the following contents:

replaced by |newer version

That copies the D template but the reason parameter will be partially filled. -- 05:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hehe, you might also want to check out this script, which allows you to define your own templates to insert onto a page. Instead of having to make a new template called   you can just use D with a custom pre-filled parameter, like this:

toolbarTemplates.push({ name: 'Replaced', ns: 'File', open: '', sample: 'Image.png' });

That'll add a new drop-down menu item with the D template almost already done! -- 15:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

monaco.js problem
Your monaco.js page is appearing on Category:Speedy deletion candidates. 16:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Add  to the beginning and   to the bottom of your monaco.js to fix this. - 16:28, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Palindrome
You like that do ya? 02:18, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your a very stereotypical aristocrat =) 02:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Little bot of horrors
Yeah, a bot would be relatively simple to implement for that. AutoWikiBrowser probably can do that too, although I'm not familiar with that program. If everyone's OK with such a bot running I can work on making it, but I'm not sure of the timeline. Changing some of the templates which use those images will fix many of the mainspace uses but of course that won't cover all of them. -- 05:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's what I would do, open a new topic and if it looks like there will be consensus then I can go ahead and start coding/testing it. -- 16:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

RE:File:DragonChainSet.gif‎‎
Firstly, reason for removal from Dragon chainbody article? Secondly, you don't need to open VfDs for images, that's simply ridiculous. VfD is for articles. 04:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You take the discussion to the file's talkpage. If your reasoning makes sense, most administrators would go ahead and delete it. However, following your reasoning, we might as well crop half of this image away because there's little difference. Also, an image being sd should not be a reason for its deletion (unless there is a HD version available). 04:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, images don't need VfDs because they are fairly "transparent". For articles, there may be disputes about why the article should stay, its significance, etc. However, for images, it's quite simply "Is it being used to show something in an article? If not, delete." 04:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a HD version of a male character, as you are already aware. The fact is, there is a difference between the two, and if the image is able to show that, then I don't think it should be removed. Besides, if you put a speedydeletion tag on an image, and an administrator removes it, you can post on the file's talkpage and have a discussion with the specific administrator. It's not as if administrator's don't monitor the recent changes. As said, images are fairly "transparent", so disputes tend to be rare. 04:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If you had read what I had said correctly, you might have noticed that I never said that images were of any less importance than articles. I simply explained that when it comes to images, things are much more "transparent" (simpler), and disputes are thus rare. I don't see the relevance of you mentioning that you challenge policies or the fact that the discussion went dormant (that happens to just about every Yew Grove discussion if the proposer doesn't monitor it closely - see example, Forum:Translucent Menus). 04:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I care about images too -- 04:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Suit yourself. You might have noticed how the vfd template says "discuss this article's entry" though. Keep in mind that I never said that we shouldn't get community consensus or that my opinion was more important than yours. I still think your reasoning is illogical though (seeing as you haven't addressed some of the issues that I mentioned above), but I guess that can't be helped . 04:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * This one: "It's a HD version of a male character, as you are already aware. The fact is, there is a difference between the two, and if the image is able to show that, then I don't think it should be removed." 05:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Then you better VfD File:New_dragon_plate.png while you're at it. 05:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: Signature
Thanks for the heads up, bro. 19:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

File:RuneLongUpdate.gif
It may look similar but it is still a different file. Please review our criteria for speedy deletion so that you understand when you are and aren't allowed to tag something. 22:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You have done well, my young apprentice. 05:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)