User talk:Frede173

Revan, put your spam here :3
woohoo He has knocked four times. 13:57, March 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * 14:00, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * wat r u 14:00, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * OMG PLZ LUV ME DO He has knocked four times. 14:10, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * KTHXBAI He has knocked four times. 14:14, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Everybody else, post below
-- 14:02, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

jah
omnomnomnom 14:35, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hell yeah 14:39, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess you think he's hot? 14:44, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * This be you 14:46, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Eh
Why does the Wiki suck? 18:57, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wai frede wai!! 06:30, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Ach! what happened?
I tried joining your clan chat ingame, but it says your username dosn't exist, what happened?

There's a certain player called "Frede", by the way...

19:49, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Letter from Uberfuzzy
In light of some recent events here I thought it would be of benefit to share out this letter that Uberfuzzy wrote to Azaz129 with all our active sysops, and he has agreed to let me do so. This is not meant as a slap at any one for recent actions, just as some food for thought about us and where we want to be as a wiki. As you and your wiki has shown in the past, a large stable community can exist and be fairly self sufficient at Wikia, with little need from staff/helper intervention. This is a dream of ours, to have more wikis run themselves, allowing us to focus our finite amount of time and resources on the sites that actually need it. Sadly, your wiki is an exception in many ways, not the norm.

As with the checkuser, we've shown that we're willing to try things out, to break away from the mentality of "how things were done in the past" to see how they fair in the ever evolving world of wikis, and to get some real world data on how a stable wiki will react if allowed more rights. You've been great test of our theoretical worries about granting checkuser where needed.

Done. You bureaucrats can now add and remove bot rights.

One thing We've always admired about your wiki is even though you have a way above average number of sysops, you have managed to keep the bureaucrat list small, showing that you understand what that roll is meant for, and not just another checkbox. We hope to continue to see good things come out of runescape, and can continue to use it as a shining example of our dream.-Uberfuzzy --Degenret01 08:56, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

>:(
My browser is being a pain and refusing to let me send you a message on YouTube. :( He has knocked four times. 16:40, April 8, 2010 (UTC)