User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

My previous talk is now archived. For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four

Chaos rapier image
I'm sure you were expecting someone to complain about the image, but I bet you weren't expecting that person to be me! Now, I agree that the costume is stupid and flashy and needs to go away, and ordinarily I'd be fine reverting to a lower-quality image, but I feel that the only other we have is just too much of a dive in quality. As much as I hate that type of vainglory, I think the Snorks-esque image is the better one. 07:18, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * You own a chaotic rapier? If so, you might be able to take a better picture if you zoomed with your browser. If you use firefox, this is "ctrl +". But make sure you click outside of the runescape window, like on the gray header bar, before you press ctrl +. You can also go to View->Zoom->Zoom in. Just sayin' is all >_> 08:14, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Or the equip screen, which the fact that you didn't use likely means that you do not own one, which means that you can disregard the advice I posted :P 08:16, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Help me talk page stalkers
My sons laptop won't connect to the internet and I don't know why. It is a HP g60 with Windows vista. Neither wireless nor a wire will work. Any ideas how to proceed? Thanks.--Degenret01 22:16, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ohderlawd! Try downloading drivers for the modem and wireless card that comes with it. Check the device manager (under the network adapters category) to see what he has, then look for drivers for those models. 23:57, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
Hello, I was just wondering if you would be OK with having a link to your email on RuneScape:Administrators. You don't need to provide your email address, as it will be linked to through Special:Emailuser. Please respond on my talk page. Thanks! 20:18, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Minning glitch.jpg
I was gonna use it. D: --Coolnesse 02:17, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

You're gonna love this!
Given your comments in Forum:I was permanentley banned apparently?, I felt that showing you this would be in good taste. 23:57, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re:nom for adminship
Runescape:Requests for adminship said to let them know they had been nominated. 07:52, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

A modest signature for you
 Ghosty Degen  →→  ←←  08:50, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

DAP
Hey mate, your section of the D.A. Project will be opened next week. However, after seeing the relative success of the other sections which are more article formatted I believe a slight bit of uniformity in style would be beneficial. Basically, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to make your section look more like the others, other than that the content is great.-- 17:08, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:wow
What Chicken said, plus if he fires back, we get to block him for longer. Win-win. -- 03:44, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of his conduct, in fact I was the first user to warn him about his incivility. This is his first full-fledged block, as you removed his first one prior to it expiring. Give some time to see how he reacts to this. -- 03:58, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

you edit power count level
it's over 9000... 09:28, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * must resist urge to edit, still not level 99 farmaritaville. besides i mustn't edit lest i might accidentally let Iiii I I I think i actually am a wikiholic...  09:46, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Please
Which one are you talking about in particular. Because usually I only request closure to older threads. 06:48, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:No fear mongering on the Yew Grove please
Maybe I shouldn't have stated that comment in that particular place, but it was on-topic. Composite was describing (dairly aggressively) how he sees our community and policies, and although I don't see it as aggressively and "desperately" as he does, I somewhat do share it. It is not "rumour-spreading". Everyone knows that people leave eventually, because they have other commitments in their life. But that should be the only reason. You too would know that users, especially experienced ones, are leaving/have left because of the way things are today. But I apologise; I shouldn't have brought up such a point in that particular place. 13:47, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Signature Edit
I saw where you edited my signature, and not that I mind but, when I set it up I set it up according to the max height rules set down on this page, where it says in bullet number 4 the max height is 40px, not 28. So if the max height is really 28, that page needs some updating. 17:24, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, lol. Okay. 21:51, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've made a modification to the max size value. See, the biggest inventory sprite image there is would be 34px high. I think we can both agree that no inventory image is too tall for the purpose of signatures, so it makes sense that the max size should be 35px (because 34 is a prime number! no one likes those). Do you agree, sir? 04:09, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * But 34 isn't a prime number.  09:57, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I like prime numbers. They are like me, nothing can get into it. Ummm, seriously though, I did not realize that inventory images all fit into a single line of text. If it doesn't make the page lines uneven in spacing, thats all I care about.--Degenret01 04:20, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can fix it without shrinking inventory images (which makes them look really ugly) by adding "vertical-align:3px" or whatever to the opening span tag of a signature. That shifts the whole thing down so any uneven spacing it would create is shifted to the space between his last line and the start of the next line, where it doesn't matter an din fact helps a little. 02:24, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * If people can't be bothered to make their sigs look proper they deserve for it to be all ugly and whatnot.--Degenret01 02:28, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, sir. *adds blinking and gifs and white-on-white text to his signature* 02:29, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * You wouldn't be the first to have that sig --Degenret01 03:35, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:btw
Heh, thanks :) 02:04, August 11, 2010 (UTC)