User talk:Real Not Pure/Archive 1

Re: Pures Versus Non-Pures
Hi, Real Not Pure here, with my first editorial! Hope you like it!

This it loosely about my name. A few days ago, in the Fist of Guthix lobby, a level 46 wielding an obsidian maul asked, "Hey real. Why do you hate us pures?" I replied with a quick "I don't" to avoid a long and tedious discussion about how I couldn't use "Not A Pure" as a name. I only wanted to avoid being asked if I was a Defence pure, because I kept coming out of the arena wielding nothing...

Honestly, don't condemn me. Pures are fine by me, I just don't understand them. As far as I can see, the only advantage of being a pure is to have abilities well beyond your combat level. Every pure has a disadvantage. Defence pures can't hit hard enough to kill anything, and end up being meat-shields. Strength pures can inflict serious damage, but a low Attack level makes their accuracy suffer. Attack pures are a bit like Flesh Crawlers. They can hit consistently, but without a Strength level, the damage remains in the low numbers - below 100 damage, as a general rule. Ranged pures are a bit more dangerous, but still die quickly when someone lands a few lucky blows. Magic pures live with the same problem.

As for those who wish to keep Constitution as low as possible (I refer, of course, to those players that enter PvP games to get runes, like Fist of Guthix, and splash Curse, or Stun, until the game ends), I can only ask, "Why?" What possible advantage can running around Gielinor with 100 lifepoints to offer? Quests like Monkey Madness, and others that include a run through high-levelled enemies, are near impossible, as you can be almost 1-hit KOed. Dungeoneering is perfectly possible, but your experience will be severely penalised by frequent deaths. PvP results in being killed quickly by almost anyone able to hit reasonably high. And as for traversing extreme conditions, like the Ice Path or the desert, where constant damage is inflicted, you simply cannot survive!

Now, let us look at a non-pure account. The combination of several combat skills makes a balanced, healthy fighter. I'm not a pure (obviously) and, while I'm not at the same skill standards as some players, I can hold my own in fairly dangerous situations, like fighting Bork, or being attacked by a hulking level 120 while playing Stealing Creation. Non-pures can also switch from one side of the combat triangle to another, to fight those using prayer, or monsters like the Dagannoth Mother, to get around those shields that protect from certain attacks.

Fights between pure and non-pure accounts can be extremely varied, although the pure tends to either lose or be severely damaged by the end of the fight. The most difficult to judge are generally between non-pures and Strength pures (also the most common pure). Sometimes, the pure is killed too quickly for the non-pure to take heavy damage, while at other times, the pure lands several gigantic hits, killing the non-pure. However, this is rare, as the preferred weapon of the Strength pure is the Obsidian Maul (or Tzhaar-ket-om to some), and mauls are among the slowest weapons in the game.

Defence pures can last a long time, but won't deal much damage, for reasons mentioned above. Attack pures deal fast damage, but are usually beaten fairly quickly. Summoning pures rely on a familiar, but Protect from Summoning negates the damage, and the non-pure can easily murder the pure. Magic pures, who have miraculously beaten Desert Treasure at level 1 Defence and Prayer, will unleash Ice attacks at a non-pure expecting melee combat, but the non-pure can quickly switch to Ranged, equip Dragonhide armour, and the pure will die. Similar events take place when the non-pure initiates combat. They can use a Seercull to destroy the pure's Magic level, and happily Melee away until the pure dies. So PvP is out of bounds to pures as well.

So, I don't hate pures. They just sacrifice large parts of the game and I'm not sure why they would want to. Please don't flame me for it.

There we go. I proofread and fixed up some awkward or unclear parts of sentences here and there. However, I think the title of the piece isn't letting the readers know that you're comparing the advantages of both pures and non-pures. Also consider elaborating on non-pures, like their own weaknesses or how they would fare in a fight against a pure.

20:02, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

I edited chur userpage
The Advlog autoupdate template is case sensitive. So I fixed it on chur page. 16:06, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll edit chur page/sub page to where when the bot updates the page it will work, okay? 16:16, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * When QBot get's started, it should work. 16:21, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * QBot currently isn't running. To see it's operational status, check here. 15:47, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

vandal.
want to stop undoing my vandal undos? kk thanks 17:36, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * read before you undo stuff.... you removed a thing about jungle potion when it was in the right spot... that said "druidic ritual is required to complete jungle potion" and you said it wasn't

stop undoing stuff that isnt wrong.... 17:43, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

ROFLCOPTERZZ!!!@@
donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts donuts

Sincerely, 11:58, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

Obi Wan Said No
When I ordered him too....

>:D

Snapecraft 12:02, October 9, 2010 (UTC) <-- no sign here

O rly? Snapecraft 12:20, October 9, 2010 (UTC) <-- no sign here

Me
Why do you feel the need to remove the dialog from the page on Me? I, personally, think it should stay.
 * Orly? Soz, didn't know. Michagogo 17:22, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Bonzai!
http://i1045.photobucket.com/albums/b451/Rangedwhip/cabbage9.jpg

13:20, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Cuz you signed
Yay! Cookie! Thanks! :D! 23:16, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Wikibugs
Are you having as much trouble with your view of the Wiki as I am with mine? The problem could definitely be on my end, but several Wikia sites are giving me nasty surprises. Any insights? --TheLastWordSword 20:49, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mmmm, tried several skins and reloads, still funky. Page loads across the Wikias have to be halted to log in. Dunno then. Maybe it's the public comps. They're doing a revamp over Thanksgiving. Maybe they started early. Thanks for the confirmation that my world is full of flying elephants (opens umbrella)! --TheLastWordSword 21:11, November 13, 2010 (UTC)

Signature
Nice sig idea :) very original - 08:26, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

Jack Shcitt
Who is Jack Schitt you ask? The lineage is finally revealed. Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says " you don't know jack schitt." Now you can intellectually handle the situation. Jack is the only son of Awe Schitt and O Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O Schitt, the owner of kneedeep N. Schitt, Inc. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt, and the deeply religious couple produced six children: Holie Schitt, Fulla Schitt,Giva Schitt,Bull Schitt, and the twins, Deep Schitt and Dip Schitt. Against her parents' wishes, Deep Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced.

Noe Schitt later married Mr. Sherlock, and because her kids were living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Schitt-Sherlock. Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt and they produced a nervous son, Chicken Schitt.

Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt were inseparable throughout their childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony. Thewedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens wedding. The Schitt-Happens children are Dawg,Byrd, and Horse. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son left home to tour the world, and recently returned from Italy with his new bride, Pisa Schitt.

So now when someone says, "you don't know Jack Schitt", you can correct them. -- 22:41, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

About your letter
This is about Real Not Pure/Letter about images. I'd like to say we own the copyright of the images. There is no need to contact Jagex about it, because it is the law and we as a wiki can't change it. They as a RuneShark can't do that either. So there is no need. If you still like to send it, I'm not stopping you but i just say we got the copyright of the images. 10:51, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Force him to read this and the bottom of this, and if he doesn't: Kill him by mass trolololo!
 * But srsly: it is the law. He should understand that. 17:43, November 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Something for you..
Thanks! Im lovin' the purple elephant ^_^ - 06:47, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Impatient?
Who's impatient? i had to wait 6 minutes! i could have died! 20:30, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope you do, as i will sue you for not keeping your promises next time! and i am not impatient! 20:35, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... i'll have to live with it then... 20:42, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your sig...
Eek :/ I was changing sigs, and it might have gotten messed up in the swap. Thanks for letting me know! User:Ia Morte

DDD
[http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:Improving_our_community&diff=prev&oldid=3610381 What are you on about, that's me adding text...Not deleting it. and even if I was, it's my own.] 10:58, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. Because instead of pressing edit I pressed back which meant when I saved your edit wasn't there. 11:06, December 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Sig
Thanks for reminding me. I added the link when I was only half way through reading the loooong discussion, so I didn't know it had been closed. Link removed. -- 18:52, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your signature
I checked and i see quite fine after my own signature. It, perhaps, has something to do with the coding in the signature, maybe the part that gives it curved edges when viewed in Chrome. You may want to look at the problem in a different web browser, or send me a screen-cap. I will leave a copy of the default signature here in simple code to avoid repeating this problem. Metapig 20:47, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I have looked at your screen-cap and taken another look at my own coding which i have saved in a document. I don't see an apparent problem, though. You may want to take a look at my coding yourself. Here it is:
 * http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/1739/rswikisignaturecoding.png
 * I have separated the coding into 3 sections: the first is the part saying "Subscriptio" which appears unaffected by the problem, the second part "Metapig" which appears to be the cause of the problem, and the final part "Disputatio" which is affected by the problem. Also, as a not, -webkit-border-radius causes the border to be curved in a specified fashion. It is only visible in webkit browsers, Like Google Chrome. Metapig 22:32, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Does this edit fix it? There was a  tag that wasn't closed. -- 01:03, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow! I didn't see that! Let's see if it works... 01:22, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:I (referring to you) lol'd
I have no toleronce for typos, how ever minor they be. 00:15, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

My Crown
Bah1 That's nothing. Anyway, that could have been done by adding something to the infobox... 19:41, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Factual correction
'''You have an article that only deals with the most extreme sense of the word "pure."

A "pure" can be 99 attack, strength, ranged, magic, summoning, constitution all at the same time.'''

'''Not ever pure is 1 attack 99 strength 1 defense 1 magic 1 ranged. - Virtually none are.

The VAST majority of pures do so for PVP reasons, they don't care about fighting monsters like Bork, and besides that... they still can, they still do if they want.

Most defense, prayer, or constituion pures are meerly the same as a level 3 skiller except have an added skill just to be unique.

In a basic PVP situation a level 95 pure will be "maxed" or have all 99's excluding prayer (52) and defense (1) where as a main will be around the realm of flat 75s.

So you are saying an account with 99 attack and strength, as well as a Chaotic Rapier, Sara Sword, etc etc will not hit on the main in say torags and ultimately wreck them? Why do you think so little "mains" pk with so many pures in the wilderness. One style works, one style doesnt.

You're kidding yourself and are way too lazy to truely realize what a pure is, and what they can do.'''


 * lrn2html -- 23:31, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re
Firstly, who are you?

Secondly, delete my talk page. Please. PLEASE. [mailto:PLEASE#!@$@#%$#$ PLEASE#!@$@#%$#$]^#

14:46, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

It's just a dumb policy with no use. I'm starting a petition. Please delete it. I beg you. 14:53, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Ok thanks. 15:02, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Wiki Family Photo
Hi, thanks for taking an interest in the family photo, to make things easier for both of us, please follow these steps.
 * 1) Take a screenshot in game with your character saying your name/a message
 * 2) Save the screenshot on paint or any other picture programme (Be sure to crop it or scale it to around 150x250px)
 * 3) Upload the file to ImageShack (No login required)
 * 4) Finally, post the image onto my talk page

Thanks  20:02, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Have a present
zomg membership credits plawx 19:30, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
You have been given the rollback button, per your request. The rollback button is located in page histories, diffs, the recent changes, and contributions lists. It should only be used for definite vandalism. If you have any questions about how to use it, feel free to ask me. Dtm142 22:10, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Closure
Because a request to open RFRs (that being a RORFR ) was written and no consensus was reached on the first part of the proposal, there was no action left to be taken. In other words, no consensus. 23:38, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * After ages of seeing it written down, I just realized that "Trololololol" is a combination of the words "troll" and "lol". Man, how do people come up with this stuff? Speaking of which, why do you think Wikia picked the name "Monaco" for the old skin. Did you know that The Principality of Monaco is the the second smallest country in the world? I tell you this because I just got an email from a ShoutWiki thing telling me they created a Monaco-substitute. 01:33, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Welcoming
it's getting worse... 21:51, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://i1081.photobucket.com/albums/j355/Joeytje50/Welcomespam.png It's getting A LOT worse...! 20:42, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * u r leaving links to rea; not pure... 20:49, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Zammy GWD
That's what the saradomin brews are for ;) - 15:43, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

@@@@@!!!111eleventyone
Thanks!

12:46, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Your message on my talkpage: speculation
OK then am i allowed to go delete the picture that says possible armour...

that is speculation, wich as you pointed out is not allowed.

I mean the image that says the possible look for 3 armours. i can delete that from the page. here is a screenshot of the image i mean.

http://img341.imageshack.us/i/speculation.png/

possibly? really, that is speculation wich is NOT allowed.

surely, as i am a busy guy, you can please notify an admin at once!

My userboxes
It worked! Thanks so much!

TeacherWand 18:07, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Most EPIC WIN EVER!
I'll try to sum up a funny story that happened a few years ago:

I got a vasectomy.

I met a girl soon afterwards. She was nice and attractive but with a selfish streak that raised a big red flag. She was 32 at the time and I could practically HEAR her biological clock ticking. Regardless, she was a good lay, easy on the eyes, and reasonably good company.

I did NOT tell her about my vasectomy and I always used a condom with her to protect against STDs. She assumed, obviously, that the condom was only used for birth control. Silly girl.

We date for a few months. I never made any move towards commitment but she brought it up ocassionally. For me, this was a casual but pleasant relationship. For her - as I was to find out - it was part of life-changing series of events that she was planning very carefully.

Four months into dating, I get the "I'm pregnant" talk. She's going on and on about how the condom must have broke and now we really need to think about getting married "for the baby". She's positively giddy. She has a baby in her and she thinks she's gonna have a good meal ticket (me) to go along with her new 7lb annuity.

At this point, I'm just as giddy. I get to pull the reverse "oops" on her. I figured that she slept with some bad boy and got knocked up. Good thing I was using condoms! Better still that I have a serious mistrust of women who can't think beyond their own uteri.

So I wait a couple of days to "think about all this." I meet her again. I say I don't want kids and that she should have an abortion. I know where this is going and sure enough it goes there. She goes completely batshit insane on me. There were the usual insults about my manhood. There were threats of legal action. It was all very ugly and I was loving every minute of it.

Well, I let her stew for a few days. She leaves me nasty messages on my phone. She sends awful emails. I'm laughing hysterically.

It was time to drop the hammer. While she was stewing I was busy. First I get a notarized copy from the urologist who performed the vasectomy. Next I get a notarized copy of the TWO test results indicating a "negative test result for sperm" to show I'm sterile and shooting blanks. Finally, I get a letter from a shark attorney stating he has seen the other documents and is prepared to litigate against this woman if she continues to communicate with me in such an unpleasant manner. Also, the letter states that we will insist on DNA testing to show that the baby is not mine. I'm ready.

I meet with this woman at her place. I bring flowers and a small bit of jewelry to show I am willing to reconcile and assume my responsibilities as a new father. I also have stuck in my pocket the documents I have prepared.

She's all giddy again. Her plan is going perfectly - or so she thinks. We talk about our future. We have some pretty good sex. Then, as I am about to walk out the door, I ask her the $64,000 question. "Are you sure that this baby is mine?"

Well, she goes batshit insane again. Hell, she ought to. Her plan could completely unravel if there is ANY question about my paternity. Oh, she's really screaming now. How dare I question her morals. Do I think she's a slut. I'm just trying to weasel out of my responsibilities... blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda.

I'm not really mad. I'm kind of embarrassed for her. But since she won't shut up and the neighbors can hear all of this, I ask her to step back inside and sit down. She sits on the sofa and calms down a bit. She is glaring at me with all the moral self-righteousness that only a woman can muster up. She thinks she has me trapped. She is 100% convinced her plan has worked. Oh, the tangled web of lies and deceit she has wrought around herself and I am about to hack through them with a few pieces of paper.

I reach into my pocket slowly. I extract the three pieces of paper and unfold them slowly and deliberately.

I tell her simply, "You're screwed".

Her look doesn't change. There is no way she can fathom what I have prepared.

I continue. "I am sterile"

Her look changes just a bit. Something is beginning to sink in. Naturally, she reverts to women's logic. "You're full of shit. You're trapped and you know it."

I hold up the letter and the test results. "Three months before we met, I had a vasectomy. Here is a notarized letter from him stating what I had done. Here are two test results showing that I tested negative for the presence of sperm. Blanks. I am shooting blanks. That baby inside you is simply not mine."

This woman is not to be swayed by logic and clear documentation. "Bullshit, those are fakes."

I was ready for that. "No, they are real. This last piece of paper is from my attorney. It's a simple letter to you that states if you pursue any kind of legal action against me for child support that I will insist on a DNA test to prove paternity, that is, to prove that your baby is not mine."

I give the woman all the documents. She reads them slowly, deliberately. With each passing second she can feel in her soul that she has made a very bad mistake. With denial swept away, she started to cry. It's a small cry at first. Then it becomes deeper and more painful. By the time she gets to the letter from the lawyer she is sobbing.

I had no sympathy for her. I turned and walked out the door. Even after I closed the door I could still hear her sobbing.

Epilogue -

I never heard directly from this woman again. I did hear through my friends that she did indeed have the baby. I also heard that the real father was some guy in a band she had met. I assumed that after 30, women stopped going after musicians, bikers, criminals, and thugs. Silly me for thinking the best of American women.

The Moral of the Story -

Get a vasectomy but keep it a secret.

-- 11:57, January 15, 2011 (UTC)

...
... Wow. Simply wow.

22:55, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Proposal
Hey Real, it would be great if you would nominate me for adminship, and I happily accept such a nomination. Thanks, and good luck with your paragraph about me! 00:07, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

sigs
Hi, do you still create sigs cause I've got a request on the requests page and if you're not too busy

I would appreciate it if you could tend to all the unfinished requests (especially mine!)

Thanks for your time

— Pokmnbogroll (talk) 03:29, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll do it. I used to make them but I went away for a bit. 03:31, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Slay Swagga Sig.!
Umm I'd like the slayer sign/logo (the one from game skills menu) on the left side with a black border (filled). I'd like "Slay" in red font and "Swagga" in white font. Thanks!

Signature
Did chu steal mah colour scheme? :O 19:42, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nah, I don't mind. Just all a new reason to try to come up with a new signature. :P 19:51, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Wut.
Heh, I guess ^^' 21:57, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

RE:YOU_ASKED_FOR_IT_NUB
Brassica priem <3 20:32, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Info-rsmod
Dleet pls. ppl r dum n fall for it. 11:11, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Myface
Nop, I been want join for long time but only now I allowed. 13:42, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Argh
You ninjad my welcome@@@@@ -- 16:07, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

500
Your welcome, nub. ~Snapecraft.

RE:Idea
I'm afraid that's not going to work, as it follows the false premise that people will actually follow the rules when nobody (other than them) is watching. Thanks for the suggestion, though. 14:57, February 19, 2011 (UTC)