RuneScape:Featured images/archive0

TzTok-Jad
Reason: - Breaks the guideline: The image is taken from RuneScape game client.


 * Support Neutral - Tollerach made a good point. I support delisting after replacement images are chosen. And was the guideline made after featuring? 22:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The criteria listed have not been put through consensus or otherwise approved by anyone other than AZ. Besides, all of the images I submitted which have been supported unanimously do not meet the current criteria. 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ample time was given to discuss the criteria for nomination. I just assumed that since no one actually bothered to discuss this, I took the initiative of finalising the criteria.  If you wish, please discuss this specific criterion in the talk page.  13:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The guidelines were put in place to get this up and running. I disagree with this guideline at this time.  Until we have several good game client images, I say we leave these images in. Besides, they look good.  23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Once we have more ingame images, then it can come down. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. 11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Guthix
Reason: - Breaks the guideline: The image is taken from RuneScape game client.


 * Support Neutral - Tollerach made a good point. I support delisting after replacement images are chosen. And was the guideline made after featuring? 22:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The criteria listed have not been put through consensus or otherwise approved by anyone other than AZ. Besides, all of the images I submitted which have been supported unanimously do not meet the current criteria. 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ample time was given to discuss the criteria for nomination. I just assumed that since no one actually bothered to discuss this, I took the initiative of finalising the criteria.  If you wish, please discuss this specific criterion in the talk page.  13:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The guidelines were put in place to get this up and running. I disagree with this guideline at this time.  Until we have several good game client images, I say we leave these images in. Besides, they look good.  23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I must admit, its a good image. Leave it until we have more ingame images. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. 11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Avatar of Creation
Description: A battle for the Avatar of Creation at Soul Wars. Reason: Too cluttered with players, the health bars and various prayers don't look good.

12:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support deletion - As nominator. 01:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Opose deletion - It's one of the best images i've seen :)
 * Oppose - This picture isn't just about the Avatar, but it helps. We get a nice view of the Avatar, as well as the chaos of Soul Wars; and it's not like the HP bars are taking up the majority of the screen. Admittedly, it is a tiny bit cluttered with the Prayers and HP Bars, but not to the point where it detracts from the image immensely. -- [[Image:Dragon two-handed sword.png|Beware the underrated.]] Pikaandpi  Berserker Fury![[Image:Bandoschestplate.gif|Hit hard or go home.]]‎ 14:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If a replacement image is found, the image can be nominated under "Nominations to replacement"
 * Support replacement - If you can find a tie Soul Wars world, I'm sure you can find one that isn't so cluttered. [[Image:Saradomin sword.PNG|25px]]    Tehnoobshow101  18:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm free-to-play. 05:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Support replacement - If a better photo is taken I support replacement.-- 19:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Image has been nominated for replacement. 09:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

TzTok-Jad (2) and Guthix (2)


Previous nomination: See above.

Reason: These images were not taken from RuneScape game client, and are used under "Fair use". These were one of the first few images to be featured on the Main Page. Now that we have about 30+ images, I think it is time that we removed them.


 * Support - as nominator. 16:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Jad, Neutral about Guthix - I never liked Jad's image anyways. You can't even see him very well. The Guthix image is nice (maybe replace it with an image of Guthix during Meeting History?). 17:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If you have the image, please nominate it in "Nominations for replacement". Thanks. 17:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nominator; they really were only kept as there wasn't many featured images at the time. Now there's more we should apply the rules to them, and delist them. 18:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Both - Finally!
 * Support both - per Azliq. 08:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - per nom. 10:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both Sorry, but they were always a bit... I dunno. They just didn't seem well. Especially Guthix.
 * Support both - For the reason explained in the description
 * Support both - Per nom. 00:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nom. 18:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nom. 07:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Both images are delisted from the Featured images list. 20:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Zanik
Reason: In my opinion, the image doesn't diserve to have a place in the first page...The quality seems like its 2nd category.


 * Support - As nominator
 * Weak Support - It's true, the quality of this picture can't match the quality of the others now, but I still <3 Zanik. 13:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but the image criteria is only about quality,size etc ...If you love or not the npc does not metter for the voting and it will take as a comment.
 * Actually, I'm still supporting the nomination, and I'm STILL commenting on the bad quality. If I'm SUPPORTING you, and just made it weak (as if it won't be delisted, look at the support already), there's no need to flip out. Again.
 * Gosh I am not fliping out, I was only informing...
 * Support - To be honest, I was contemplating nominating it myself. We have a lot more featured images now which I feel greatly exceed this image in quality. 14:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - ITS HORRIBLE. Yuck! 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - As said before, it lacks the large quality and detail than the other images. When you look at this, the first word in your mind will most likely not be "wow!" 15:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It will be "eek!" 15:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I never really liked it anyway. She looks scary! 19:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - It doesn't look good on main page, I don't think any npc chatheadi image ever will look good on main page. Secondly I don't even think that it's so good image, that deserves nomination of Featured Image. 07:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If a guy that plays wow or some oter game like that opens runescape wiki and see this image it will certanly say: omfg runescape realy sucks 11:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Image is delisted from the Featured images list. 18:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Brassica Prime
Description: All hail Brassica Prime!

Reason: It shows the size of the cabbage god compared to the player but the colours are a bit dull and dead.

Old nomination - Found here.


 * Support Delisting - As nominator. -- 16:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - It's a pointless picture, it's just a huge cabbage and a player with some sparkles. >_>
 * Support Delisting - It should be removed from the featured images but not from the wiki, because it is a discontinued event. 17:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Per Requiem and Gragon. --George10 98 04:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Per Requiem, pointless image. 08:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * support delisting - Per all... and the player ruins it 08:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just a note to you all. Most of the images here don't really have any point, featured images are chosen based on image quality. 08:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Its not that great an image, and as said before, seeing the player there ruins it 14:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination for delisting is successful. 14:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Zanik
Original image: Image:Zanik detail.png


 * Support - As nominator. I think that the second image is more colorful and more visually appealing. I think RuneScape offers several better images compared to their floating chat heads.  01:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I prefer the images here to be ingame, capturing the perfect shot can be hard. When it is just given by Jagex, it doesn't follow the criteria The image is taken from RuneScape game client. 02:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Visit the RuneScape homepage - its on the top of the page there. Why do we need to put it on our main page too? The old image is fine. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. 15:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Avatar of Creation
Original image: Image:Battle for the Avatar of Creation.PNG

Description: A calm picture of the Avatar of Creation at Soul Wars. Reason: Re-uploaded a whole new picture as someone said that the old one is too cluttered.


 * Support as nominator: Replaced the image for a more 'calm' look on the Creation Avatar Requiem1160 15:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose replacement: with the same angle can be ok. --Dindirindin 16:21, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: It took along time to get the avatar in the camera focus, and in the other picture he's dieing/attacking - this was taken in a Tie World where no one is allowed near the opposing team's avatar
 * Comment: This is why the other image description is battle for the avatar of creation, because is a battle, not a image of the avatar.--Dindirindin 18:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - This image is not used in mainspace.  Please ensure this image is used in an article.  09:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Added this picture to an article. Requiem1160 11:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is a great pic and I bet it took some time to capture, but the other pic is also very nice, so I'm neutral. 23:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. 15:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Dragon Forge
File:DragonForge3.png Original image: File:DragonForge2.png

Previous nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive6

Reason: Anti-Aliased, No player in the way and shows alot more due it being bigger.


 * Support Replacement - as Nominator. 21:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong support - Per Req 04:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong support - Per nom. 17:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong support - Per Req 17:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - No player makes it better. 17:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination for replacing is successful. 12:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)