User talk:Liquidhelium

Please direct all spam/blackmail/threats to this page: User talk:Ajraddatz. Thank you.

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole. Please see my FAQ before posting a question.

Pinao
Empty talk pages require immediate rejuvination. 07:26, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Revisiondelete
Hmm, what was that? 08:09, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

Third!
I have defiled your talk page! MWAHAHAHAHA! 17:25, April 18, 2012 (UTC)

thread

 * 1) Forum:New infobox for auras? needs to be closed
 * 2) you like closing threads
 * 3) you are not biased here
 * 4) you will close the thread. 08:48, April 23, 2012 (UTC)

CC Messages Trans
Aight, sorry :p 17:34, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

You're still watching
Behold, your gazer eye. It dissolves my innards. http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/5168/evileyeh.png

-- 21:36, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

S:C vs IRC
I'll admit, that argument shouldn't have happened publically in the chat, but I'll try and put this rationally.

There is clearly a preference dispute between the IRC and S:C, and whether I like it or not that's not going to change. I have zero problem with your closure of Forum:How do i redeam tickets from quests aready done. It's impartial, there is no conflict of recommendation and the offer is there to help guide the editor. A good way to close the forum imo.

However, Forum:Grand Exchange no longer accepting armor sets? displays none of this. Not only is there a conflict of recommendations, it's questionable whether it is actually true. Hair answered the question fine and did exactly what you did in the first example. Again, there is no issue there. You just added in a snipe for no apparent reason. Whether your opinion is true and supported by fact is irrelevant in this case and I really didn't see why there needed to be that IRC > S:C part to it. The IRC could have been offered in addition to the previous offer.

I realise that others may do the same but that doesn't make it right to do the same. As a highlighted sysop (yes it means something to the new editors out there) you should be setting an example, not causing petty disputes. So please, will you try to keep such opinions out of discussion like the second example? If it makes a difference, I will make a point to offer both chat mediums where I see such a question raised from here on. 01:26, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

Custodians
Seeing as you slipped out of IRC before I could interrogate you, I'll have to pester you here instead; do you remember the title of the thread that passed the Custodian usergroup? I can't find it, and I can always rely on you to remember threads you left your stamp on. 18:42, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Merci. 18:49, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Runecrafting
I knew it would cost me this. However I will also be attempting the same trek tonight so I'll be even further behind. I'd rather see the Avengers to be honest than play games tonight anyway. During this weekend I'll try to catch up. However, the upcoming weeks don't bode well for me due to increasing workload. 14:17, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Re:First
I finally took your advice. -- 22:50, May 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/3112/19662842.png

-- 00:07, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

How the system works
http://img846.imageshack.us/img846/1540/ragewo.png

-- 17:29, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

RE:
And why are you still up? 06:52, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nope, exams haven't even started yet. 00:40, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Because I don't want to study. 00:43, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah... it's not good, I know. 00:45, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol. Nah, that wouldn't work. 00:48, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, good luck. 00:51, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Bah, fine. I'll go to bed. 07:13, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Stuff
Needa chat with you about something rather important and probably not suited for open discussion

10:25, May 8, 2012 (UTC)