RuneScape:WikiCapes/Requests/Archive 1

Wikicape of Applying Transparency

 * Please note that the first cape suggested for this has not achieved consensus, please only comment on the second one. 17:40, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

I suggest this transparency wikicape. 20:27, October 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - As nom. 20:27, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - As 2nd voter. Kinda shocked Chicken didn't make one. 20:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you got a good idea, you can request them at This guy 's  talk (try clicking the links and u'd be surprised ) 21:03, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Holy cow! I've never seen someone use code to make it seem like someone else! 02:43, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's amazing, isn't it 20:28, October 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - Meh, don't see why not. 15:49, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * btw, I don't think you should have uploaded it before this passes. 15:49, October 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose Image - I support the cape in principal, but not the cape image. The cape itself is supposed to have an image within it symbolic of whatever the cape is for, similar to all the others. The image should also be transparent. I had to delete the version you uploaded to the wiki, because you can't host it here unless this passes. 16:05, October 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I don't like the image, if you created a better one, I would support, as it is logical in principal. 09:26, October 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Pending oppose - Get a better image, this is "Wikicape of Applying Transparency" but I see a semi-transparent box around it (ie. poor trans job). See this, I fixed it here. 21:10, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Could we have a transparent wikicape? Like, umm, this? 22:37, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, much better indeed! 22:41, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose image - If you insist on having the grid, then it should be a small fully opaque grid, such as File:Checker-16x16.png, only bigger, and it should only appear in the middle of the cape. If you want the image itself to be transparent, although I do find it rather gimmicky, then it should be something more imaginative. 22:49, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose Image - The cape is okay, image isn't.  22:45, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Any suggestions what image should be in the center? and should the checkered cape stay, or should it have semi-transparency, or should it be colored? Any suggestions are appreciated. 12:48, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Like this one then? It has an icon... 03:00, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * The checkerboard effect needs to be removed from the cape itself, as it would create an inconsistency in the capes we do not want to set a precedent for allowing. I would support the 2x2, fully opaque transparency grid in the center, like the image Psycho mentioned. 22:47, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * But that 16x16 thing is ugly... it is also quite small. I think it should atleast have a fade out or something and be bigger, if that is going to be used. What if i remove the checkered things of this cape, and just place that round checkered thing on a new cape. Would that be ok? 19:22, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't thinking of leaving it the same size, this is what I had in mind. 22:06, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah, too big.. Maybe the size i use in the current nom, because enlarging the grid doesn't look like pure trans. Then use multiple squares, not only 2x2... 18:24, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - The first version is now closed, please only comment on Chicken's version now. 17:40, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

-

Suggestions - Was popping by and saw this. Made a newer version with a centred image and transparency, but also used Joey's idea as well. So he can be the creator  06:05, November 12, 2010 (UTC) http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/photoshare/images/4/45/TransparencyWikicape.png

ASDLAJKsdHAJDHSLJNAD STRONG support - OMG!!!! 09:49, November 12, 2010 (UTC)

Support Chicken's version - I like. 17:40, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

Notice of Intent - I know I'm not neutral here, but this discussion has gone on for half a month with no discussion. Unless it picks up, I will have to close it with no consensus in the near future. 21:36, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Love it! 21:38, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Consensus was not reached in a timely manor. 00:39, December 4, 2010 (UTC)