User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

My previous talk is now archived.
 * One
 * Two
 * Three

Spam
Hi. 09:04, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Sitenotice id
Oh, lol, I just updated it for consistency's sake since we always updated the id for every update the Sitenotice had. Btw, Powers has been in denial all along. 14:45, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

I am confused...
Why are you not green anymore? Are u still admin or not? User:Rswfan 15:32, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re: UOTM
I just noticed before you said so. Thanks.

Also while I am here, from watching forum mods I have learn the best way to deal with people that offer ultimatium of "do this or I will leave". You would say why what they want can't happen/say how they can go about trying to achieve that change, then have a sentence at the end along the lines of "If you do decide to switch fansites, goodluck with the future of your clan." 07:30, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

WTF?!
Oh mah gooossshh, you blocked someone, but you're not green? I call hax!! Oh wise Skullball, is Degenret using hax? "You're magic skullball says "Yes." HAX!! 10:38, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re: 2 more names to block
How long should they be blocked for? 01:32, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Kaphite soldier charms
Yeah, I agree ;\ I think I'll stick to killing Bork once a day  05:46, February 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * I would need 10,640 water talismans if I was making geyser titan pouches from 89-99 summoning... how would anyone ever get that many ?! 06:01, February 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * 66 million coins for 10640 talismans... damn. 06:01, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Template
I can answer that. The template is still being used, it is being substituted instead of just transcluding it. 05:28, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Why do you hate templates?
Its so if you hit the [ edit ] they don't edit the template 05:29, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

I was acting like a noob. He went on to say stuff like "im a narby admin lulz" etc. 13:30, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: More ignores man
How long should all the "FMA" spammers be blocked? 13:44, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Need an uninvolved admin
Taken care of. I'm sorta curious about why you removed your name from the hilite list though. 13:47, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * When I closed the thread, I put the block time as 2 weeks. Hmm, anyway, with regards to your comments about the need for the admin usernames to be hilited, you make some very good points that we already have project pages for regular users to contact administrators, but I'd say that the hilited names are helpful because they are...(for lack of a better term) convenient. Not that it's harder for users to use the CVU than contact an admin, but rather, seeing an admin in the Recentchanges lets them know that the admin is online, so if something needs to be done quickly (e.g. a Protectsite, or a small-scale vandalism spree), the admin can be contacted to help. The highlighted username in the Recentchanges not only provides visual aid in spotting an active admin, it also identifies them (seeing as we have so many, some are less known than others). The CVU and Admin requests while effective, sometimes takes up to hours before an administrator actually deals with them (even the active admins online at the time forget to check them), so the highlighted username is really helpful in such situations. 14:16, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Idea
pl0x 14:39, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
I totally understand it now. Thanks for your kind message.

I have no idea why the shooting star community uses such names lol. Probably something that 2 guys happened to know.

Anyways, ty.

84.25.111.174 16:57, February 6, 2010 (UTC)Costa Rider