RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Parsonsda

parsonsda
i Spend most of my time on runescape wiki, and the best edits i made are as followed:

pages created:
 * choose option

pages edited:


 * while guthix sleeps i edited the reward scroll to make it look at it best.
 * cockatrice head i added how hard it was to get.

pages fixed:


 * Defeating the Culinaromancer was vandalized, until i fixed it up, now it say the npc battles. Parsonsda 13:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

''I, parsonsda, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,'' Parsonsda 13:40, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

mainly i would like to take part in checking pages all over runescape wiki, some of them are quite old, and need updating, i would be happy to do that. I also be happy to help any other users on runescape wiki. also being a look out for big news, unknown items and other thing yet to come.i would also revert vandalism ban ip if needed, and most importantly remove fake pages.

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?

I love to fix pages, Though some pages i cant fix, like pages including npc, such as larry Though i do try to do my best of my abilities and fix as much as i can. I also like fixing random pages that i can find and i know, witch really helps players who visits runescape wiki in a big way, im always willing to help, no matter what the cost. '''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?'''

if i had a user that would of caused me stress i would give them 3 chances, 1. warning 2. 2nd warning 3.(if possible) a temporary ban, thou most of the users on runescape wiki have no problems, so i don't think ill have any problems with any users in the near future

Discussion
Strong Oppose - First of all, you clearly don't understand how this process works because I had to spend about 5 minutes fixing this page. Second of all, you've barely contributed. Your edit count and lack of contributions is enough, but you have also never ever helped revert/report vandalism. 17:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

~i must say thank you for fixing up this page, i was going to do it but i forgot, if you get enter in the rfd ill put a good comment under you, thanks again.Parsonsda 15:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)~

Strong Oppose - Soldier pretty much summed it up. Few edits, no anti-vandalism, no community discussion work, didn't answer RfA questions... No reason for you to need admin tools at this time. 17:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

~the resons i want have some admin tools is so i can help better, Though you argument is good, thanks~
 * Well, since you didn't even participate in a common admin activity, which is Counter Vandalism, I don't see a reason why a need is needed. Also, there is no adding speedy deletion to pages to let admins delete the pages. 15:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Strong oppose - You are completely unworthy of being an admin. 23:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

~i edit quit alot on runescape.wiki i made a page called choose option, but your right about discussion, i will try to discus more in the future if or if not i become part of the runescape.wiki crew.~

Strong Oppose' - You haven't signed the RfA or answered the RfA questions, and you need more than edits to two pages to be an administrator. 23:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Strong oppose - You don't really seem to be active in the community by posting in the Yew grove. Also, what everyone else said above. 23:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment - I'm looking at the comment above me and loling.

~lol~

Oppose - Per all. 00:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - 45 mainspace edits. Not enough to vote for UotM. :| Sorry, but I don't see much edits, anti-vandalism work, discussion at Yew Groves, help placing Speedy deletions when needed, and more. 02:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - You didn't even bother to use capital letters. -- 03:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Is this someone's idea of a joke? Per all, they summed it up. You have a long way to go; right now you barely have over 40 mainspace edits, I haven't seen you around before, you didn't sign the rfa nor answer any of the questions, and you described in detail 2 or 3 of your edits without proper capitalization. 04:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Someone tell me why the hell capitalization is a big deal here. Christine 05:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment I realize Parsonsda made an error in his requesting admin tools. They have little experience here on the wiki so informing them of why you are opposing is constructive criticism. Well and good, they can use that information to better themselves. But to those of you who choose to mock and feel superior, you disgust me. That is not the way to build a community of people working together. If you have nothing to add that can be used by Parsonsda to help them further their knowledge, or simply wish to oppose to show that you are "with everybody else", you do not need to add to this discussion. --Degenret01 04:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Needless to say 05:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per above. I don't think you really understand what adminship is about, so I suggest that you read RuneScape:Guide to requests for adminship. 06:34, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per all, sorry. 06:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - I hadn't even heard of you. Like others have said you really need to have a look at RuneScape:Guide to requests for adminship.-- 07:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment - 1)"some of them are quite old, and need updating" You can check that without being sysopped. Go here. 2)It is "Though" not "thou". 3)It is asking you if you had conflicts with other users in the past, not asking you how will you deal with users who annoyed you. :| 4)You said you edit a lot and created a page. I don't think having under 100 mainspace is "a lot". 5)Please try to work on your grammar. 6)There is no RuneScape wiki crew. :| Everyone is equal. We are all just editors. 13:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7)You don't need admin tools to revert vandalism. Please click the undo button when you find vandalism and report it to the CVU. 13:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

~thanks for the tip =)~
 * Also, you can easily create a space by adding : and try to remember to sign your post with ~ . :) 14:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - As you can guess, it's failed. 15:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment - Also, by deleting comments from this page, you are breaking "Don't Delete Discussions", which shows not a strong understanding of the policies of the Wiki. 15:53, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

~sorry, forgot, it because of one person keep saying im worthless,if i cant delete him, ill just do it him, thanks for reminder.~
 * If you can't handle people calling you the worst most offensive things imaginable (or in this case someone simply insulting you), how could you possibly hope to become an admin?-- 16:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

OBSCENELY STRONG OPPOSE - Firstly, you have less than 100 edits. Secondly, the edits that aren't reverting vandalism are poorly written and non-NPOV. Thirdly, you tried to erase someone's comment because they didn't support it. I don't know if you'd even know how to use the admin tools if you got them. WWTDD? 16:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)