User talk:C886553/STELERCUS IS THREATENING ME

RE: 92.21.150.44
Thanks, I got him. Feel free to report vandals on the counter vandalism unit in future  22:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

info
it wasnt biased info i stated that it was a good tip to collect them. and that you could make about 225 per trip not that you make at least... Sir erik54 Talk  03:57, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * i found some vandalism earlier actually in a template. i didnt know how to report it so i just fixed it. someone had hidden links to a university website in user box templates and i just deleted them. 04:03, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Block
Next time he vandalizes he will be blocked. 03:55, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

vandalism
When an ip or a user vandalises, you can report them. It is usually often checked by admins, so you don't have to wait long for a block or admin warning. 04:00, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I was just pointing it out, because sometimes, the last active admin may not be active again for a while like User:Butterman62, who appears to be semi-inactive. 04:05, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ruud beat meh to it. He has knocked four times. 17:53, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your brains.
He has knocked four times. 17:02, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. :D He has knocked four times. 17:05, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

this
Why did you post that? Users are not allowed to remove discussions, only archive them on a separate page, per RS:DDD. Vandalism can be removed, but that's it. 05:09, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that RS wiki was messed up that way. I apologize. Ajraddatz Talk 05:10, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hiya
Just sayin' hi. Nice to see you're still around here. 05:33, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just noticed some vandalism, and cleaned it up :) Ajraddatz Talk 05:37, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

A comment
About your warning to User:66.245.220.118's talk page, User talk:66.245.220.118, first, shouldn't you use the standard template? Second, shouldn't you use the slightly more standard, 'contributions', instead of 'contribs'? It makes you seem more, erm, 'professional'. Hello71 01:00, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I am not a regular editor here, and just stop by to undo vandalism. You are right though; I'm not sure why I didn't use contributions. Also, I left the message because I feel it is important to tell people what they did wrong when reverting good faith edits. Also, I am slightly offended at this message. You could have simply fixed my wiki jargon oopsy, and politely told me about some of the policies/procedures here. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 01:04, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Reverting
These edits (1, 2) are not vandalism. Reverts are only to be used for obvious vandalism (eg. Page blanking, adding random text of spam, etc.), and for those edits, it should be undone with a reason (undo). Remember to reread this policy, and this article so you can avoid those mistakes in the future.

Thanks,

• Shade Silverwing (600613) •  01:13, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that was a booboo. Please just point out which edits were wrongly undone, I must have misread the diffs. I know what AGF is, and also, what I was doing was an undo. For the second one, I clicked the wrong button. Sorry. Ajraddatz Talk 01:16, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

Reverting
I clicked saved before i could get it in also i did explain on the talk page 19:02, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rollback should not of been use there.... thats why i undid and it was a red link category.. 19:08, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Please make sure you read RS:ROLLBACK and Help:Revert and sign here. Feel free to leave me another message when you have done so. =) 01:55, February 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * You have been granted the Rollback tool. Please ensure you only use it for blatant vandalism. If ever in question, undo and leave an edit summary. Happy editing. =) 02:04, February 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm, what do you mean? I just used undo, I did not use rollback. I admit I have made mistakes using rollback in the past, but I haven't recently. As for why I didn't leave a message, it is because when someone goes to edit an exchange page through an 'update' link, it preloads a template which is supposed to be read, umm Template:ExchangeItemHelp here. Although now that I looked at it, I realized it didn't say not to use commas, so I have added it to the template. 02:11, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand, and I usually do, but I also think I understand why many don't. It's because they don't believe it will be read or understood, as many keep doing stuff, ie uploading images, after they have been deleted for being personal, and alternatives provided, so many feel it falls on deaf ears and basically give up typing something. Of course I could be all wrong here, but I think I'm at least somewhere close. 02:17, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Instead of Template:ExchangeItemHelp, the GEMW instructions and information are now held at Template:GEMWHelp. I was here adding a nowiki tag, so that when ExchangeItemHelp is deleted, a red link won't appear. See Forum:Reforming GEMW instruction templates. 03:49, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Revert
kthx -- 03:35, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Your signature
Your signature appears to stick its source code into pages you edit. This means that when you use the four tildes ( ~ ) to sign a page, instead of being put into the source code of the page, the raw code from your signature template is put there instead. This can cause problems, since long signatures can cause messy code. Furthermore, if you change your signature, then what you signed already does not get changed to your new signature. To prevent this, please follow the steps outlined in RS:SIG. In a nutshell, just put into the signatures box under your user preferences. Cheers, -- 01:10, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * ... Erm, look before you leap. I have an extremely easy and not complex signature, that in no way violates your policies. Ajraddatz Talk 05:10, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * First of all, it's not my policy lol. Second, it's not the length of the code that matters. Quote from RS:SIG: "Some people create a signature code by placing the raw code in the signatures box and skipping Template:Signatures entirely. This is no longer allowed as it places raw signature code on each page you sign, taking up unnecessary space." What you are doing is placing the raw code of your signature on the page, which is against the policy. It is preferred to have put on the page instead. -- 02:00, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Read this. It clearly states that you are not to put your signature source code into pages. -- 02:10, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

CVU
[ I'm slow :O] -- 02:27, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm Ajraddatz :D Ajraddatz Talk 02:28, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
It's great that you help out, so don't think I'm trying to say you shouldn't. But what I am saying, is that it's probably better if you just let admins handle the CVU reports. The page is set-up for that, and it's better if someone who actually has the power to block them is the one telling them not to vandalize. -- 02:29, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I appreciate your input and all, but you don't seem to realize that I am removing them after they are blocked, so the admins don't need to. Is there anything wrong with that? At the end of the day, a vandal blocked is a vandal blocked, and there is no need to have that sitting around for longer than needed. Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 02:31, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well yes, that's fine, but I'm not seeing them blocked. If they were blocked there would be a blocked picture on the left side and text saying they had been blocked for vandalizing and they were welcome to contribute once their block was over.  User talk:98.237.0.127-example of someone not blocked.  User talk:D4n13l0wnz-example of someone blocked.  -- 02:44, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * But consider, when an admin sees only user names on the CVU history, we need to go check it out. If you let a sysop do it we will all know it was handled in full. So it saves us time if you don't actually. Not that your efforts aren't appreciated, just a perspective you may not have considered.--Degenret01 02:47, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I only ever remove people that are blocked, so no harm is done, especially since they are removed right after anyways. Ajraddatz Talk 02:49, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * [Double (Edit conflict this is to Haloo)] Not all people get their block message. Plus anyone can warn a vandal and it doesn't have to be someone who can block. I have warned a LOT of people before and will continue. Also why the hell is everyone picking on Ajr...? 02:50, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I may be blind but I see that that IP is blocked. Ajraddatz Talk 02:52, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Pointing things out is never ever picking on some one Tua.--Degenret01 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * First of all, the IP noted above shouldn't have been blocked. He had done nothing wrong before that, and wasn't given a change. Second, as stated three times above, I only remove the names once they are blocked. Considering that they are blocked, that is a pretty sure-fire indication that they are dealt with. Additionally, please state very clearly what I have done wrong. To be blunt, unless I have violated a major policy, or made an error I couldn't care less. Please, just point out the error and be assured that it won't happen again. Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 02:58, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying you have done anything wrong. I was just trying to make a suggestion on a possible improvement.  I'm sorry for bothering you in that case.  -- 03:00, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Degen, I was half joking...kinda. The user in the section above was annoying Ajr with no merit. And then this calling him out again for something he didn't do wrong :P 03:01, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? I just said he didn't do anything wrong.  And as for the annoying part...well...us 138s are good at being annoying jerks...sorry.  -- 03:07, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re
It's just the database acting up, like when the sidebar randomly changed for many people. 03:16, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Especially when it's true, it happened to me [ here], the only change I made was adding a t to scepre. 03:28, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, it's Stormsaw1. I met you on Brickipedia. Just wanted to say hi!

05:05, February 27, 2010 (UTC)<-Check out my sig. It changes color:)
 * Hai :) Ajraddatz Talk 05:05, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Bot Request
I really do apologize if you feel like I've treated you that way, but I'm simply trying to prove my point. I'm not a fan of excess and prefer the Kiss principle when it comes to getting things done. Again, I'm sorry for my conflicting views, but I cant support something that I don't actually support. I've responded, and that will be my final comment unless I do in fact change my mind and support your proposal. -- 22:06, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, You're not harassing me, I understand how frustrating it can be when you can't make someone see something the way you do. Honestly, I would stop trying to convince me as I seem to be a lost cause =]. As I'm sure you know, I've changed my stance to neutral, and hopefully others will be able to see the warrant in your argument and support you, but as I've said, I cant support something I don't believe in. Again, please don't take my opinion personally, your intentions are good and I'm not holding anything against you for what you are trying to get done, but I just cant support for reasons I've elaborated on in the discussion. I hope you can understand =| Thanks -- 01:27, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bot
Very well, if you know what you're doing I'll stop commenting on that thread. On a side note, I think that Azliq has a good point. You should show me (and others) what your bot can do. I don't think very many of us know exactly what you mean by "Cosmetic changes to code". 22:12, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, ya, that really is the problem. I will be doing that. Ajraddatz Talk 22:13, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Bot feedback: It works really smoothly and I like it. There is one issue, though. The bot seems to replace Runescape with RuneScape even in links, causing them to break. I've fixed the two red links that I've seen. Is it possible to update the bot so that it doesn't change words within the link brackets? Other than that, the bot is great. Cheers, 02:55, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Warning
The way you continued to strike out comments and remove ones you felt were "un-helpful" is simply not allowed. Then removing to archive only those points which might negatively impact or prejudice peoples opinions is also completely disallowed. You are fairly new so I will tell you this. You, for YOUR own sake, NEED to become familiar with our policies regarding discussions and the treatment of other users. If I see such wrongful behavior form you again you will receive an immediate block on your account. All editors are to be treated with respect, not contempt. If some one fails to understand a point you wish to make, it is up to YOU to explain it more clearly as the presenter.--Degenret01 02:42, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have made it completely clear, and have not deleted the point. I have archived it to the other page, which still counts towards the consensus. I am trying to help the wiki, and am doing so, however when people like that get up and stand in my way without any good and valid reason then I do something about it. Additionally, in this case following the rules is not beneficial to this wiki. I am trying to get a bot approved that will help with just about everything, and have proved that it can work well, so people that oppose it without a valid point are being counter-productive. In the archive of the forum I have proven all of the opposing points wrong, so there isn't any point in bringing the same ones up again. Ajraddatz Talk 02:46, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I am treating other users with as neutral of a standpoint as I can, considering the circumstances. Also, you should know that I am not new here. I am very experienced throughout Wikia, and know all of your policies. I am trying to help this wiki, and being opposed in doing so. I do need to be more polite to other users in this matter, but I am sick of being treated as a troll while I am trying to help. Ajraddatz Talk 02:48, March 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Removing only those sections you disagreed with and using strike outs was 100% wrong. This is inarguable. And this is the entire basis for my warning. Cheers--Degenret01 02:52, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not really, there are supports in there as well... Ajraddatz Talk 02:52, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Bot
Yay first edit! You're absolutely right that we talk about nothing useful (though we do have meaningful discussions occasionally), but that's what makes it so fun! Also, acorns>grapes. Grapes you have to eat individually. =/ It's slow. I find it funny that your bot made more edits in two hours than you did in ten months. 03:40, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, this isn't my main wiki. See here ;) Ajraddatz Talk 03:47, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rwojy meant the present for me. You don't want it. It will be some bomb/explosive that will kill me. 04:21, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, but I am stealing it :P. I tend to love butting into other people's conversations... Sorry. Ajraddatz Talk 04:22, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re: That recent vandal report...
Sorry about that. I just assumed he might have been upset at the update and was attempting to vandalize that article, but it's obvious that I've jumped to the wrong conclusion without any valid reasoning behind it. Thanks for letting me know about my mistake, and I hope I haven't didn't cause any problems by "jumping the gun" earlier. 04:31, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Archive links
You need links to any/all of your archived talk pages at the top of your talk page, for ref. purposes and such. Thanks.--Degenret01 04:38, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 04:39, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
I understand your frustrations. I believe the community here is more into manual editing (labour) as compared to Wikipedia, where automated edits rule the day. How I wish there were bots here similar to the ones in Wikipedia. I truly wish that you would try again some other time. And I hope you don't leave the wiki out of frustration... please continue contributing to this wiki. Best wishes. 18:08, March 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * It annoys me as well how this community hates change. We never seem to accept anything new on the terms of "It was working well beforehand". I like many of the things your bot can offer, although it seems the community has no need for them. Thanks for trying. Cheers, 23:19, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
That was my fault for assuming it was vandalism. Usually (98/100) a large decrease in an exchange page is vandalism, so I rollbacked first and didn't notice that my edit added back. 03:33, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I assumed that you did something like that. Don't forget to check next time ;) Ajraddatz Talk 03:35, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Nice to see you back. 22:12, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just doing some bot stuff, actually. This is more about beating User:VegaDark's editcount than being active here again :P Ajraddatz Talk 22:12, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lmao, you already have him beat hands down. 600+ to 21. 22:14, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh no, I'm talking about global edits. I'm a few thousand behind him :/ Ajraddatz Talk 22:15, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's OK, I understand. 22:26, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Trolls are to be ignored
Never ever ever encourage someone to vandalize here. See RS:DFTT. We don't need that crap. Thanks. --Degenret01 23:07, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I never, ever feed the trolls. What are you talking about? I revert vandalism across Wikia, know a lot more about vandalism than you do, and follow Wikia's general guidelines at all times. Please, what are you talking about? Ajraddatz Talk 23:08, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Telling some one to vandalize definitely falls under DFTT. . --Degenret01 23:14, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry. However, read a bit more and you will find that what I was saying is that the vandalism would be undone within seconds. That was the point of it. Also, that wasn't a troll, just a normal good faith user. Please read a bit more carefully. Ajraddatz Talk 23:23, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have never treated you as a troll, please stop being so argumentative. And anyone saying what he did about our wiki is NOT a good faith user. Anyone else could come along and read that "invite" to vandalize. Just don't do it, very simple. Thanks and cheers.--Degenret01 23:43, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Recent changes overload
Hey, I noticed your doing quite a few bot edits. If your going to be doing this, I ask you go to your prefs and mark "mark my edits as minor by default". While your doing this, I would like to hide all minor edits so I can look at the non-automated edits (such as vandalism, sloppy coding, and other things I look for) that the automated edits are making harder to find. I also recommend you don't make this a habit, as I imagine other users will begin to be upset by it. 00:58, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I thought that I already had that set. Also, these are semi-automated, not bot edits. Ajraddatz Talk 01:00, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Dont worry, They are already marked as minor =D Stelercus, select Hide minor edits on the recent changes to hide 'em. -- 01:01, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't have it set to hide them at the time of writing, and got around to doing it just in time to see this message and get into an edit conflict (gotta' love em'). 01:03, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * It should be noted that I would love to be doing this on a bot account right now, but since the community opposed it's flagging, here I am. The forum is closed, so that wasn't something meant to get you to support it ;) Ajraddatz Talk 01:06, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * It should also be noted that I do not see a clear advantage to what your doing. What is it? 01:08, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am bypassing redirects. While this may not seem very helpful, it is. Not only does it eliminate what links here problems, but it allows for all templates to not have the possibility of messing up when a page is moved, decreases the chance of double redirects, makes certain advanced extensions easier to use, and generally is cleaner :P Ajraddatz Talk 01:13, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Speaking of this, I don't know if this is really the best think to be doing. This redirect fixing is just introducing a lot of unneeded code into articles. It seems unnecessary and better if fixed by hand. For instance, on here, you linked player Moderators to player moderators, when simply removing the capital M would be the best way to go about it. -- 01:14, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * This allows for the article to be the same, while fixing the problem. Also, this is only what, about 100 times faster than by hand? Ajraddatz Talk 01:18, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem that Aburnett brought up was a legitimate one, but it's just impossible for a bot to judge when it's best to replace the article link text and when it's best to leave the article text as is. For example, I have fixed a link to Rellekka that was put as Relekka by the bot, since it has no way of telling that there was a misspelled word. But, for other things, it's best to leave the article text as is. My position on this is that it doesn't make much difference either way, so just let the bot run its course. 01:23, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right, the only problem there is is spelling. However, it still fixes the problem, but leaves any original errors present. That is still a win. Also, this isn't really valid, because as I just said the problem is fixed, and that is what matters. This way it also preserves the article, so as stated directly above the only mistake is that it doesn't correct the original mistakes. Overall, a benefit. Ajraddatz Talk 01:27, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Please cease this defensive manner, it is not exactly attractive and has turned a number of RSWikians against you. I think that bots are a good thing and that when implemented right they should certainly be welcome. However, the manner in which you have been acting is not impressive. Some times ypou just have to admit that you're wrong and bow to the will of the community. Dark avorian 23:51, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * What manner is this? Why can't you leave me alone? Ajraddatz Talk 00:04, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, the "will of the community" in this case can be summed up in this general statement: "I have no clue how bots work, and think that the current slow way of making minor changes is sufficient". Ajraddatz Talk 00:07, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no comments on whether or not the will of the community is the "right" view. However this wiki is run by CONSENSUS. By the way, the manner I was referring to was demonstrated quite aptly by you above, you refused to cede any points, acknowledge my actual argument, instead attacked a side comment I made as background info. (EDIT: Oops, sig) Dark avorian 00:11, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * "...I would love to be doing this on a bot account right now, but since the community opposed it's flagging, here I am." That, I have a problem with. The community opposed the bot, why are you going ahead with it anyways, on your own account? That goes against a community decision and RS:BOTS.
 * It was requested on his forum that he demonstrate his bot and its edits for about two weeks. I don't think the two weeks are up yet. 00:16, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, never mind. Scratch that. Time sure flies. 00:17, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, he declined the request for a bot. tLUL, you're right this is in violation of RS:BOTS. Also, don't insult us with comments like "the "will of the community" in this case can be summed up in this general statement:I have no clue how bots work, and think that the current slow way of making minor changes is sufficient". We are entitled to our own opinions, even if they are different from yours. You should learn to accept that. -- 00:21, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Concerning your semi-automation
Hi Ajr, I'd like to discuss your semi-automated edits with you. It seems that although many of your edits are constructive, the plurality of the community doesn't seem to like them. The community doesn't seem to like having the Recent changes flooded with semi-automated edits. Although I realize that your automation hass a large potential at the wiki, everything must be community approved through the consensus system. The current consensus seems to be against your bot, largely due to lack of knowledge about the power of automation. However, since that is the consensus, we still have to abide by it. So, could you please yield to the prevailing opinion and cease the semi-automation (or tone it down slightly)? Thanks! 00:25, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, don't worry about it. This is just like AWB, which is allowed, and I confirm every edit before it is saved. I'm actually not as involved in this as I let on, am well aware that other people have their own opinions, and respect them. However, RuneScape Wiki as a whole bothers me. First of all, the entire wiki is built to emulate Wikipedia. Every thing here is just copied from there, nothing original. The main thing that bothers me though is this; a community completely incapable of doing anything in a mature and orderly fashion. It might surprise you to hear me say this, but all that you need to do is follow the links to some of the RfAs that I have filed, or the wikis that I contribute to (other than this one). I am actually not an immature moron bent on being a rebel against the wiki's rules/policies, like it may seem. However, I find it very funny to watch the reactions of some very thick skulled people, putting down my attempts to help the wiki. While it really bugs me that people can be so blind, and unable to accept any new ideas, it's OK. I'm mature enough to not react in a negative way to this. The only thing that I regret about my actions is that it gives people like you, or TLUL, the wrong impression about me.
 * However, since the stuff that I am using is semi-automatic, and not in violation of RS:BOTS (which is also mainly copied from Wikipedia, or the general idea anyways), I will continue such edits. Although, yes, I could slow it down a bit. What I regret is losing my head for all of about five minutes a few weeks ago, which has ruined my reputation here and severely disabled my ability to help out here. Ultimately however, I don't care about RuneScape Wiki. I contribute to other wikis with flexible communities, and people who are willing to try new things. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 00:47, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, some more examples of how unoriginal this wiki is: (RuneScape:All_editors_are_equal - Wikipedia:WP:EQUAL) (RS:AGF - Wikipedia:WP:AGF) (RS:DFTT - ). Actually, looking at the policies, the only original ones are really the style guide and the game-specific ones. Ajraddatz Talk 00:52, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Er, what's detrimental about copying Wikipedia policies? I'm of the opinion that if Wikipedia has useful text that we could incorporate here, then we should go for it. 00:55, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * If we are so immature, I do not understand why you are still here. And why would we re-write policies, if they are already fine in their current state.  I think you completely ignored the point about it spamming recent changes as well.  Also-I think some of us might feel uneasy as your bot is running without community consensus.  Personally...I don't have any problem with it, as it is doing helpful things, other than the fact that it makes it hard for anyone else to edit things in recent changes due to the spam.   01:00, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm still here because this is a large wiki, and it is one of the wikis that can benefit most from some stuff that I can do. Also, thanks, it is nice to know that at least /some/ people can recognize constructive editing. Also, the issue with copying Wikipedia is that you aren't properly implementing the policies. On Wikipedia, my current actions would qualify under IAR; since a policy is clearly standing in the way of me helping out. Ajraddatz Talk 01:07, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I realize that I am clogging the RC. The next time I run the thing, I'll do it slowly over a long time period. Thanks for the constructive input. Ajraddatz Talk 01:08, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Er, another reason that many people are opposed to your bot is that you have stated this is to boost your edit count. I don't think many people like the idea of editing for the sake of editing. 21:09, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am joking. I have 25,000 edits across Wikia, am an administrator on 6 large wikis. I know that editcount means nothing. However, while myself and VegaDark like to "compete", we both don't just go to a random wiki and start editing it solely to increase our editcount. See, this had given you the wrong impression of me. Ajraddatz Talk 21:20, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't try an intimidate us with your resume, and don't hold onto RS:IAR without noticing this "Rules are supposed to help improve the wiki in most cases, but if you feel they aren't doing their jobs in a particular case, you can go against them. This should not be done without a good reason and a consensus." Also, please try to understand that the will of the community is not a rule that you can quote policies against, It is the most basic unit of our wiki.Dark avorian 23:49, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * PS: I actually liked the idea of the bot, but I am displeased with the way you react to the denial and the comments about your activities. Dark avorian 23:49, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are people still here? Honestly, I have explained my reasons without flat out saying how dumb I think this wiki is, just leave me alone. I am not harming the wiki, so take your anti-troll devices elsewhere. Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 23:51, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I am not "intimidate you with my resume". I state it simply as a fact to get you out of your current mind set. Ajraddatz Talk 23:53, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just one last comment, and then this is closed. The reason that I dislike the wiki, and got upset is the fact that never have I received such a negative reaction for trying to help a wiki. It has never happened on this scale before. Even Wikipedia, who is famous for scaring away newcomers, is more receptive to useful contributors than this wiki is. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 23:56, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

'''Please do not edit this section further. It is closed by author request, and to avoid a flame war. Thanks.''' 23:58, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Signature
Do you manually type out the code for your signature every single time you sign? I've always wondered that. -- 01:05, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, no. That would be hard work and tedious. Then I would need to go all like Ajraddatz Talk . That wouldn't make much sense ;) Ajraddatz Talk 01:07, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. >.< -- 01:08, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can put stuff in your sig box other than templates, ya know :P Ajraddatz Talk 01:09, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Your recent edits
Although it may seem like I'm using AWB, my current task is being done totally manually. As a personal rule, whenever I undo someone's edits that are not vandalism (what I'm doing now), I leave the edit unhidden so they can see what I'm doing (as some people have minor changes always hidden). Sorry for the inconvenience, I've got just about 10 pages left. -- 01:14, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's only 40 pages. It would take longer (for me at least) to get a bot to do that task, it only takes me a few minutes anyways. Plus, Gaz made some general edits that I had to dodge while reverting to make sure that only the problematic code was removed. -- 01:19, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Poll
Your new poll gives us quite a lot of choice <.< 01:43, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, one of the four is the best wiki... Ajraddatz Talk 01:45, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Brickipedia? Never heard of it before  01:46, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * O.O!!!! You haven't heard of Brickipedia!??!?!?! Ajraddatz Talk 01:48, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, but why is that the only option we have? 01:50, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * (State media) I'm just joking around... I need to have some fun sometimes ;) Ajraddatz Talk 01:54, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

SVGs
Would you care to elaborate on what you plan to do with: File:Nuvola apps important orange.svg, File:240px-Stop hand nuvola black.svg.png and File:Stop hand nuvola yellow.svg? They have been unused for 10 days now, and I would have deleted them if not for your comment: "Image for warning template; please do not delete.". Yet, you have not done anything about it, so I am checking with you before deleting it. Please clarify, thanks. 07:54, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I should have marked them for deletion. They are duplicates. Delete away :) Ajraddatz Talk 12:09, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Je suis le dumb
Hey, I made a mistake on cvn-w-r when setting up my bot, I accidentally ran "/cs flags Endasil voiced" instead of "/cs flags Endbot voiced" when setting up my bot, and nice non-fail-safe template system, it automatically removes rights not explicitly specified by the template. When you get this, can you do me a solid and local op me (/chanserv flags Endasil local_op) and flag and voice my bot, Endbot? Thanks. 21:14, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, done :) Ajraddatz Talk 04:29, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Something I edited I got warned for
I got warned for editing something and I don't remember what I edited. How do I tell what it was? I don't remember editing anything

Ajrabbitz
Yes sir, that's correct. What of it? 21:19, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ajrabbitz lolol -- 21:28, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wonderful :P Ajraddatz Talk 21:29, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * [ Amg wut] -- 21:08, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:>.>
I think we both reverted back to the same revision or something. -- 21:35, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know that, but it doesn't usually fail like that Ajraddatz Talk 21:35, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Everone thinks I'm retired now. :\ -- 21:38, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You aren't!? (hehe) Ajraddatz Talk 21:39, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * FFFFUUUUUUUU- -- 21:41, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * What's the CVN blacklist? It sounds bad. -- 01:42, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * not as bad as a @@ 01:43, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * o noes -- 01:44, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * [[File:Quick chat button.png]]w00t! -- 01:49, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

bolding
It's fine and all, I just would like to ask a favor. If you find one bolded using, replace it with teh actual title plox. PAGENAME isn't meant to be used like that. 00:07, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know. On the FarmVille wiki, I spend too much time going around and fixing that >.> Ajraddatz Talk 00:08, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would fix it, but I'm lazy, and working on other stuff anyways. 00:09, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Like spamming about bukkits and lamps? :P Ajraddatz Talk 00:10, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dun need 2, my sig does that for me ;p. 00:12, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

I heard we were already removed from the feed. :\ 03:11, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Undo
I felt that what was put was irrelevent and obsolete. It stated that it excluded experience lamps, so why that edit was relevent is beyond me Ciphrius Kane 00:40, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

cvn channel
Okay, thanks. I'm just confused over " RuneScape Wiki has not been re-added to the CVN feed, so long as the admins don't keep on playing these games". They will re-add us when the sure the games are over, or they already have?--Degenret01 14:22, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

What?
What do you mean? (I just don't want to clog up the discussion with a somewhat random question.) -- 20:06, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant the use common sense thing. Unfortunately,


 * That sums it up pretty well. Sorry for the confusion there. Ajraddatz Talk 22:01, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re
Two things:


 * 1: lolz


 * 2: Errrr, I don't know how I should really say this, but I know I should, and, to be simple and short, I shouldn't have accused you on my RfF. You see, I just didn't understand why anyone would think that I'd be rude and such, and that's the only reason that I could think of. To be honest, you shouldn't have changed your vote to neutral, because what I did there didn't even deserve a neutral. :/ You acted very mature, and I acted like a jack. Sorry. :| (Glad to get that out :D) 22:52, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:urslow
What's ur refresh rate on irc/whatever you use? Mine's 10 seconds, so I see changes pretty fast, but I'm thinking about making it 5. 15:03, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well then it's just cuz you're slow. Be faster, nub. 15:06, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

stalker@@@
Everyone does it, at least everyone who has some form of recentchanges open for *cough* 15+ hours a day does it. 03:59, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I have nothing better to do. Except maybe play rs. I don't have shcul or work, so I has much free times. 04:04, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Those two Userbox/Nolifes are on my userpage for a reason, not just for show. 04:17, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * It was meant to group us together, although I don't really know how long you watch. 17:26, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd still win, just cuz I'm moar awesomer than u. 17:28, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lies@@@ I pwn all peoplez. 17:33, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * all who oppose teh bukkit must perish. 17:56, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

What's canada? Is it that place where saddam stalin killed the english? 02:42, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * So Australia? 02:55, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, so it must be China! 15:58, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

subst your templates or I'll hunt you down and make you. 16:08, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Do it yourself
Meh. --Coolnesse 22:51, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Prove how this was a bad edit
It was bad because he added 600 to the kill count but added 1500 or so charms. Its not really vandalism but its not accurate either. I made that mistake too >_> 23:11, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ya, I actually noticed that a few minutes ago. See his talk page. Ajraddatz Talk 23:13, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Blocks
Your welcome. I actually had to leave just after blocking the second one. Seriously, I was already standing up when I blocked the second. Now to clear the CVU... 23:58, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Exchange:Guthix platebody
how can those be the absolute max and min, it was lower than that a month ago. what is "AbsListPrice"? 22:10, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * so how can those be the absolute max and min? Isn't that the prices that it can;t go past, like willow long (u) have a absmin of 32 because it cant go past that EVER 22:17, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * is there a help thing for the gemw and it parameters? 22:25, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * that summary is just for a small update, I'm pretty sure that the AbsMinPrice and AbsMaxPrice are the prices that the item cannot exceed. If you can find something that says other wise, put link on my talk. 22:34, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * That could mean either the max at that current market price or the max it will ever go. Also, if that was what it meant (max at that price) why does it have that, its aslway ± 5%(see here). 22:46, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:@@@
Where does it say that removing the welcome template is allowed? O_o -- 23:15, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you think it should be added to the When does this not apply section of RS:DDD? -- 23:19, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * k -- 23:21, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal warning wut
"Your recent edits were have been reverted as vandalism. Stop damaging the content of the RuneScape Wiki, or you will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning."

I repeat, "Your recent edits were have been reverted as vandalism."

"WERE HAVE BEEN." o.O Coelacanth0794 00:04, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fail, thanks for pointing that out :P Ajraddatz Talk 03:38, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL WUT. 09:34, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Manyman :) Ajraddatz Talk 13:09, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE:amg vandaleses
Jeez, what's up with all of this vandalism? All of a sudden we get hit by either one guy on a proxy, or a concentrated effort by a group. It's happen twice over the last week or so. 18:37, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it might be a group, not because of how it happened, but because of the frequency. I agree it was almost certainly planned, most major disruption attempts are. I use group in the sense that each wave may be done by one or two people in said group, not that multiple people are working together on one attack. 20:24, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * amg I knew it, ur a vandle working on the inside! Spy! traitor! Etc! We must burn you at the stake until you are deemed fit to re-enter society. 20:29, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno, it generally starts while I'm away. I usually come into the middle of it and start handing about blocks. 20:36, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

You go help him, I have no clue how vda works. 01:43, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * err, hows about not going nuts with novandal? all the guy did is change 834 to 853 or some such, and that may be correct. 01:55, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno, I would be pretty excited to hit 85. Anyway the main point is to not use novandal for small stuff like that, as it is scary. 01:58, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * * cough* sir *cough* 02:00, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Anyway, you forgot one of the rules! There are no girls on the internet. 02:03, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * ?????? Chia's a dude, or at least everyone on the wiki (but you) thinks so. 02:07, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * nope, she's a dude (lul). 02:10, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/there-are-no-girls-on-the-internet -- 02:12, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

ur teh onlyne!
Seeing as I actually found VDA from your userpage, could you tell me if imdoinitwrong ? -- The directions here aren't very clear :\ -- 01:49, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Try

importScriptPage('User:Ajraddatz/VDA.js', 'community') var beta_mode = "off"; if (beta_mode === "on") { importScriptURI("http://vda.wikia.com/index.php?title=MediaWiki:VDAbeta.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&foobar=" + Math.random * Math.random); } else { importScriptPage("MediaWiki:VDA.js", "vda"); } $(function {    VDA.load("RV");    VDA.load("RC");    VDA.AA.setList(["Ajraddatz", "Followed by 100 zeroes", "VegaDark"]); });
 * Teh rest of dem will work eventually, except I'm too lazy to work on them ATM :P Ajraddatz Talk 01:51, April 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Help him then, by ya know posting on his page, not mine@@2 02:12, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Well, you entered the conversation mid-way through, and I was simply having a friendly chat with my fellow, javascript-smart bukkit. I could bother you if you'd like joking.
 * Do you have any idea why it breaks my other scripts? If not, I might just remove it all together for now D: VDA isn't that useful right now, I think I'm more comfortable with rollback and undo. 02:25, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * And thank you for that code up there ^ I don't see why you didn't just show me yourself, but it's probably because you smell. I'll stop bothering everyone and just not use VDA for now   02:41, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it's working fine, but I'm not sure yet how much use I'll get out of it yet I'll try it out for a few days, and if I don't like it, well, I think we all know what's going to happen to you.  02:57, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * That may be true . I'll keep it for a while then Don't think you're off the hook though; the Bukkit is always watching.  03:04, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * hai 03:05, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * EEEK @@@ Ajraddatz Talk 03:12, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Reverting
Before reverting, make SURE IT IS NOT VANDALISM. The "edible" row should not be there if the item does not look edible. Thank you, 78.151.169.66 18:18, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did look before reverting that edit, although I was not aware that the edible section should have been removed. In cases like this, I would ask that you make clear your intention in the edit summary. If you had, then this would have been avoided. Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 18:19, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I assumed that you knew this, looking at your edit count =P. A lot of edits are not thoroughly explained since it wastes some time, just check next time for yourself? also type replies into the talk page of the other user so they dont have to wait for reply by refreshing your talk periodically, thanks 78.151.169.66 18:25, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I purposely reply on my talk page; thing are cleaner that way. I can tell that you know what you're doing, so I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused you. Happy editing :) Ajraddatz Talk 21:57, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

173.67.245.128‎ edit
I might go a tad easier, I tried doing a minor edit on an article, and pressed preview, and the whole page turned up gibberish like that. So I immediantly hopped to Homepage without making the edit. It might be a glitch, but I cannot say wether this IP did this on purpose or was affected the same way.
 * There are certain things that the Rich Text Editor messes up, but this is not one of them. Something like that was most likely intentional vandalism, and so I treat it as such. Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 22:51, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Your post
Sorry, for some reason I didn't get an edit conflict, so I accidentally deleted it. 16:44, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * @@@ That's fine :P Ajraddatz Talk 16:45, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

tankses
tanks???/ amg canada is attacking@@@@@@ i must warn teh armies@@@@ 04:02, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was gonna do that joke instead, but it's too common. 04:05, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

User:Yodimon‎‎
It was created by an anon. -- 01:40, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Most likely the user forgot to sign in? Go ahead and delete it again though; I didn't notice that. Ajraddatz Talk 01:41, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * [ FFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU-] -- 02:08, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * That guy should get a hobby. Other than vandalizing this wiki. Ajraddatz Talk 02:10, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Checkuser
Just ran a Checkuser on both accounts, the IP address that turned up were very different from each other, so it is quite safe to say that there's no sockpuppeting going on here. 02:44, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

haispam
i can has legos? 16:11, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * wai u ignore me? 16:54, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. but i already own it anyways, so its okey. 17:00, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * wai? i beat u most of teh time, so i dun ned it. 17:05, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * haha funneh joke 17:07, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I sea know joke, just the truth. 17:10, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just learneded sumting@#@@@@ Teh new message template is faster tan recentchanges, it came up before ur edit did. Anyway i not be untruthful, i am alwalys disuntruthful. 17:14, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * i be truth always. 17:17, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

haha nub i pwn@@@@. 00:45, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * i saew that@@@@@@@@@ *bans* 00:47, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a little different than the rc refresh. One it refreshes every 5 seconds and two it appears on most, if not all, pages. 00:48, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I knoes u did, I posted here before you posted on mai talk. 00:49, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ikr? Now if only I understtood hao it works... Quaredude made it, and gave me teh stuff to do what it does nao.  00:50, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * wat that mean? 00:54, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * haha duble pwned. I never lie, except when I do. 00:56, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * only teh cool people can use it. 01:54, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:NOA

 * So what's good place I should train Vandalpwning on? 16:45, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have voice in that channel and I know you're joking ^ ^ Swiz played this to me already (so I kept him distracted while pwn a vandal) 16:54, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

"If it isn't broken, don't fix it"
If something is a duplicate of something else in low-quality, or is practically useless, do we really have to fix it? --Coolnesse 23:44, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * In those cases something is broken. Ajraddatz Talk 23:50, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well then, why not destroy it instead of fixing it? >_> That solves many of my problems. Alternative solutions are sometimes better. --Coolnesse 23:55, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I tend to be a stinker about keeping things, mainly because there may be some use for them at some point, and they aren't killing the wiki with their existence. Ajraddatz Talk 23:56, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You might want to go check out what I said here and here. --Coolnesse 23:59, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Blocks
All vandals deserve a warning, unless of course they where vandal bots. When I was younger I vandalized wikipedia a few times (twice, though I tried to undo it one of those times) because nobody told me it was wrong the first time around. From my experience, most vandals stop after they get a warning, and it's not our job to hand out blocks for every bad-faith mistake made by some of our misguided editors, but to those that appear to be incurable. 00:06, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Woah, calm down. I checked the two vandals, though I did not go as in depth as to see when each event took place to the second first time around (though I did before the blocks to ensure what you where telling me was true, seeing as how it's easy to confuse these kinds of things amongst all the chaos). I want this wiki to be a vandal-free database just as much as the next guy and am checking things best I can. 00:13, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I will keep that in mind . 00:18, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

first
kinda 02:08, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * amg wojwoj found meh Ajraddatz Talk 02:09, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Orly? Coelacanth0794 02:10, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/WikEd_fullscreen.png

:O
Yer stealin' mai jawb! 23:16, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * @@@ you'll need to make me an admin then :3 - joking, that isn't something which I want ATM. Ajraddatz Talk 23:17, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, I enjoy removing vandals from the CVU list and putting "Blocked" as the summary. Makes me feel like I actually did something useful.  23:18, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, I'll remember that ;) Ajraddatz Talk 23:19, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

One account policy.
Just an FYI, we actually do not technically have a one account policy. Although it has been enforced, which is something I do not like to see happen for a policy that does not exist. Just throwing that out there.--Degenret01 08:10, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I actually do know that, although thanks for pointing this out. Either way, am I right in assuming that you guys don't like sockpuppets? Heh, that's kinda rhetorical. Ajraddatz Talk 13:07, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Personally I would find more than one account odd, but as long as they don't game the system with votes or some thing, hey, go for it. Especially if you upload pics Jagex might not like lol.--Degenret01 13:14, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * As an administrator on other wikis (Brickipedia is where I've had the most problems with sockpuppets, but even that is less than one case per month), I find that if we don't crack down on sockpuppets as soon as possible, then we either don't recognize the signs later, or forget about past evidence. As it is, I keep a file on my computer with suspected sockpuppet accounts/IPs, just in case (Although not everyone is that much of a loser). We might consider making a one user-one account policy, to prevent possible abuses of gaming the system. There would be exceptions, etc, and some allowances so long as the user acknowledges that one of their accounts is a legitimate duplicate. I can start a YG thread, if you like the idea at all. Ajraddatz Talk 13:30, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I must say though, (and sorry if I edit conflict you) I really don't see why anyone would create another account and use it, unless it was a bot account or some kind of public server account. Also, for the policy, it could really just be simple; if you create another account, put template on your userpage. That would cover all of the good faith people, and then we can crack down on those making another account for less enlightened purposes. Ajraddatz Talk 13:35, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I know this is a bit farfetched, but just in case we ever allow pics from the RSMV I think that a one account policy could be bad. Although very unlikely, it would be possible for some Pmods here to use checkuser to verify the IPs of people uploading those pics, and report them to Jagex. I know, soooooo unlikely. Yet possible all the same. Of course, anyone ever doing that will hopefully use one of them things to bounce their IPs so it wouldn't matter. I'm really tired so heading off before I ramble anymore. If you make thread I'll just watch it, I am sure it would pass fast.--Degenret01 13:42, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * If a Pmod does get checkuser, then it wouldn't matter how many accounts someone had. Checkuser has the ability to not only check the IP address of an account, but also what other accounts use that IP address. Erm, without doing another CU on every user on the wiki. I'll start a thread on it, and thanks for your input. Ajraddatz Talk 13:52, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

lalalala
skul is fur lusrs, i never aint had no skol and i anit not dun no dummy. 19:25, May 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * shol is teh coolies Ajraddatz Talk 19:26, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

I dunno hao to spel ur name, so ajdrathrsrw 19:34, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

wat? i deltd it cuz it wuz gunn turn into a revert wur 20:20, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Not logged in
Of course I understand the revert. I realised I'd failed to log on after I did my edit and I got an email saying someone else had changed (i.e. my IP). 19:49, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:File:Teapotwithleaves
I misclicked and uploaded this image, so I deleted the revision. -- 00:08, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * lulz -- 00:09, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

CVU
Right.... Leave it to sysops, please. :O (I might have blocked that one, since it is pretty inappropriate, but it depends on my mood). 19:11, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * People shouldn't be blocked after one offense, especially a minor one. Simple as that. Ajraddatz Talk 19:12, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * The only time I block after only one offense is if the vandal inserted something extremely inappropriate. (Such as something of a sexual nature). That's borderline. 19:13, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Even then, there is a 90% chance that they were just making a test edit, and will stop after a warning. In case you didn't notice, this one did just that. Also, sorry if I sound angry; I'm not. Just a bit serious ;) Ajraddatz Talk 19:15, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

The 8 ball hates me! (look in the IRC) 19:45, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, I'm not on IRC right now - at school D: Ajraddatz Talk 19:46, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * =O You should be concentrating on schoolwork then. And I see an Ajraddatz logged in. 19:52, May 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * nao, how am i supposed to pwn teh vandlz if i dont watch teh rc@@ Ajraddatz Talk 19:54, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Lmao. 01:39, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damp tinderboxes are not a quest item. They the result if you take a tinderbox into the water-filled chamber in the Haunted Mine. They cannot be used to light any fires. The reason is so that the players are forced to do the mine cart puzzle to get a glowing fungus as a light source, since damp tinderboxes cannot light anything. They can't be dried either. Thus, it is a useless item. 01:42, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism?
I added a category to a page and that's vandalism?

It's alright, but how do you make a text box?

The area bellow the title, no option to write down there for me. &lt;p /&gt;

Re:Signature
Please tell me how I am breaking RS:SIG because see, there is no rule that my signature cannot be randomised. I would really like to know. 11:12, May 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Please see RS:SIG - Point 2 in the Rules section. Users must not have more than one signature.  11:14, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not making that more clear. Ajraddatz Talk 12:58, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

How do you delete accounts? Helloiamyourmom 19:21, May 7, 2010 (UTC)


thats because its true
right?

anytime,

20:22, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

yes it may be a coincidence but it's interesting. I thinkl it should be there.

20:27, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

I knew it was in good faith. Why does rollbacking give him marks or something?

21:25, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

you has "eagle peak" eyes!
i didnt notice that....the dude edited it twice back to back, he is a sneaky deleter. 21:54, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, thanks. I'm not sure if those edits were bad faith, but I'll warn him anyways. Ajraddatz Talk 21:58, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thats one of the tools I use very rarely so wasn't familiar with how to make it happen. I didn't even think I could protect it if it didn't exist. Everyday I learn something is a win. Thanks.--Degenret01 04:56, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

>.>
My bad, Just trying to help 18:24, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Slang Dictionary
Ok sorry, won't happen again ^^ Baptiejames 10:26, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Forum:Multiple_account_policy
I have to say I am surprised as hell it didn't just blow through in a matter of a day or two. Still, not the first time I mis-guessed our community here. Don't worry too much about this though, as long as we have the policy about RS:GTS we can deal adequately with those we need to.--Degenret01 23:34, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ya; I had intended to make the article more of a reiteration of RS:GTS, except more specific. I think I went a bit overboard on the bureaucratic side >.> Ajraddatz Talk 23:36, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Cake
[ What did I do?] O_o -- 02:17, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe, nothing, I was bored and replaced my name with yours in the edit summary. Sorry, that was the most immature thing I've done all month, but as I say, I was bored. :P Ajraddatz Talk 02:18, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Better his name than mine. :O 02:19, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 02:20, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * lul I'm such a nub. I should have used the username of someone who has never edited my userpage. >.> Ajraddatz Talk 02:22, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Don't be rolling back good faith edits. Undoing is fine but save rollbacks for vandalism. 23:00, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't, please like me to a instance where I did. Also, I'll bet that you don't even know why you undo (and not rollback) good faith edits. Ajraddatz Talk 23:01, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * So you can leave a summary, you don't have to be rude  23:03, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to be rude, although I am perhaps a bit defensive. I have over 6 months of counter-vandalism experience across Wikia, have administrator access on 19 wikis (15 if you exclude the ones that I created), as well as rollback here, on Uncyclopedia and two Wikipedias. I am mainly, however, curious as to which good faith edit I rolled back. Also, correct reason. Ajraddatz Talk 23:06, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Here. The other 3 edits made by the IP were positive contributions. It wasn't spam, or blanking of an article, it should have been reverted saying please don't remove info from an article. 23:08, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * That edit removed good content, and the user was warned. There was no reason to provide a summary for that, it was obviously an edit that damaged the content of the article, whether or not it was done in good faith. Ajraddatz Talk 23:09, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whenever an edit is done in good faith, you NEVER rollback. You ALWAYS revert with a reason. The reason for that is to not drive away new editors. It removed 1 sentence, and it could have easily been an accident. 23:11, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * You have a lot to learn my friend :3. First of all, the new contributors for the most part don't know how to access a page's history, much less use it. Custom summaries are ment to provide a reason for a controversial revert when an experienced editors is looking through a history, to enlighten them as to why it was reverted. Ajraddatz Talk 23:13, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, in this case, if someone was to look through the history and compare those diffs, they would instantly see why it was reverted. Hence, no need for a custom summary. End of story. Ajraddatz Talk 23:17, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * You have something to learn. I dunno what you do on your other wikis, but here, you never rollback good faith edits. Abide by that, or I'll see to it that your rollback tools are removed. 23:19, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because that edit removed content, it is not obviously apparent that it was good faith. Stop being a dick, and stop taking your past misgivings of me, and please actually read what I'm saying and accept it. There is no reason to be arguing over this. Ajraddatz Talk 23:21, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its just a simple request, please use undo instead of rollback for edits that may be in good faith, you don't have to leave a summary other than the default. I'm not mad (haloolah123 may be...). Thank you.  23:23, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not mad, I'm not being a dick, I'm just asking you to be slightly more careful. It's not like he spammed or blanked the page, he removed one thing. A lot of new users just try things out like that. (Why we give them the "possible vandalism" template, so they can learn to do that in the sandbox, and how to edit properly.) Just using rollback and they may be driven away. 23:25, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem to have missed the fact that I always do try to undo good faith edits, and leave custom summaries. This case, however, per above can not be 100% for sure identified as a good faith edit. Regardless of the other contributions by that editor, there was no reason for that info to be removed, and it is now back and the IP has been warned. It is my intent to follow all of the rules of the wiki, most dominantly common sense. Also, as I said, the custom summaries are for the experienced editors and not the newbies. Additionally, I did give that IP test1, so I don't know what you are so upset about. :S Ajraddatz Talk 23:28, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have received a few edit conflicts in the attempt to leave this message, but Ajr should know that if the user was under the impression that the content they removed was not helpful (I assume this to be the case) than it is considered a good faith edit and should not be directly reverted. 23:30, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * They didn't leave an edit summary, so who knows what his or her intentions were. I see the unexplained removal of what looks to be a fine sentence as either a test edit or vandalism, and have treated it as such. It should be pretty clear to people looking through the diffs that I rolled back the edit because of that unexplained removal, and thus was warranted. Because other users are wondering if it was done in good faith, why not ask the IP? If he was removing it because it wasn't correct, whatever, then he should be willing to explain. Ajraddatz Talk 23:35, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Tip for everyone: Don't try and criticize Ajr's antivandal work. His reverts and undos are just and correct. They also never end in anything less than a super long conversation. The reason you don't revert but undo is so the person knows why it was undone. Any user seeing it, even them, would realize why it was reverted. 23:32, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I got like 6 edit conflicts to post 3rd message and 3 for this. I'm not questioning your anti-vandal work, I'm just giving a friendly reminder: Even if it MAY be vandalism it still has a chance to be good faith, and that is why you should use the undo rather than the rollback. I don't want to see your rollback right removed, I just want you to save it for vandalism, that's all. 23:39, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * You don't understand that literally any edit could be done in good faith, such as an accident. I know many people who have accidentally blanked pages while trying to edit them. Point is this; anyone who cares would know exactly why I reverted it. Because of that, there is no need for a custom summary which would explain why I reverted it. It is redundant and takes more time in this case. Haven't I already said this like 6 times? Ajraddatz Talk 23:42, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Calm down, we just want you to use undo if you the edit can be seen as good faith, things that can't be seen as good faith are vulgarity and things of the sexually nature. Now just to calm everyone down, here's a kitten having a bad day. http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/694/snortcat.gif Feel better? 23:47, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

I'm gonna pretty much stay out of this, but everyone please take it down a notch. 23:48, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Trust me, I'm as calm as I can be when talking to three people who know far less about counter-vandalism than myself, and who are telling me things that I already know, and not listening to a thing that I tell them. Also, I'm not at all upset, although I am being serious. :S Ajraddatz Talk 23:50, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm calm too. You might be surprised how much some people know. And I read everything you said, but that doesn't make it right. You took appropriate action when putting a message on that IP's talk page. However, reverting with a reason was more appropriate in this situation, whether it takes more time/effort or not. 23:54, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please get someone who knows nothing of this to compare the diffs, and ask him why he/she thinks that I reverted it. If they can give you a reason anything close to "he reverted the removal of that sentence", then there will have been no need for a custom edit summary. When reverting edits, it is best not to guess at the intention of the person, and better to instead look at it from a completely factual point of view, and act appropriately. When I look at that edit, I see a sentence that was removed without reason. Without any assumptions, that is a test edit. Hence, I treated it as such. Ajraddatz Talk 23:59, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm trying to be really nice but PLEASE don't talk down to others. 23:55, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * You are abusing the AEAE policy now. Ajraddatz Talk 23:59, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Um, how? 00:01, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because I do have more experience than either of you in this area, and hence have a greater knowledge base about it. That use of AEAE would be saying that everyone was equal in every single way, which was something that was addressed in a forum recently. Ajraddatz Talk 00:03, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe he meant the condescending way in which he felt it was directed. 00:05, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Edit conflict withHaloolah123: 00:07, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

What people are forgetting here is that it is not enough to acknowledge that there is good faith out there, but that you must also assume good faith when you are unsure. 00:09, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * First of all, this needs to stop. This is a waste of my time. Second of all, you are all misusing the AGF policy in regards to reverting; the custom summaries are only there to explain controversial reverts so that users know why the edit was reverted. There is no point in using a custom summary for an edit in which it is clear why it was reverted; that is redundant. That is why you do not rollback obviously good faith edits; since the reason for reverting may be controversial. This edit in question can not be immediately identified as good faith, and because it looks like a test edit, was treated as such. Enough said. If you really want to argue the exact wording of policies, then start a YG thread on them. Honestly, I do know more than both of you about this topic. Take that as you will. This is really ridiculous. Do not leave any further messages on this subject. Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 00:12, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing is forcing you to read them. I apologize for wasting so much of your oh so precious time. Just be more careful in the future please. That's all I care about. 00:15, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * What part of stop can't you understand, and what part of the reason I have given for rollbacking that edit is so far beyond your comprehension. Honestly, stop this. I am very careful, and from what is above you should know that I know what I'm talking about. Stop this garbage. Ajraddatz Talk 00:18, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * We are only asking you to leave edit summaries when undoing an edit and to not revert good faith or ambiguous edits. It is a small effort that can avoid a lot of hurt feelings, confusion, and this. With that, I will avoid commenting again in this discussion. 00:20, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll stop commenting when you stop insulting my intelligence. I'm pretty darn smart, at least smart enough to figure out that saying "beyond my comprehension" is a breach of RS:UTP. 00:22, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not questioning your intelligence, I am questioning your experience in this area. Stop. Ajraddatz Talk 00:25, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * And what have you been doing instead of reading the replies I have given? I rolled back this edit with the default summary because there would be, and is, no confusion as to why I reverted it. Honestly, look for yourself. Why you people have wasted an hour of my time with this is beyond my comprehension; and I only reply to defend myself, which is why I'm still here. Ajraddatz Talk 00:25, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I suppose just sucking it up and saying you'll try to do better in the future is too hard for you. Since you're so concerned about it, I'll stop wasting your time. 00:29, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have just spent an hour of my time explaining to you in detail why there was no reason to provide a custom summary for an edit in which it was completely obvious as to why I reverted it. This is not a pride thing, I make mistakes all of the time and admit to them. However, there isn't any point in admitting to a mistake which I haven't made. Stop. Ajraddatz Talk 00:31, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * All of this is childish and I'm not going to support one person either way, I do not want to get pulled into this. But I am saying that this is quite ridiculous. XScoobsx 00:27, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Legal stuff
Can you force Coolnesse to stop breaking the laws of physics? Stelercus is a horrible lawyer, as he hasn't contacted the party at fault yet. 01:14, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I shall attempt to rectify the situation. Ajraddatz Talk 01:15, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I was considering nuking him to get my point across, but if he disobeys the laws of physics, then I don't see the point in throwing a nuke at him. 01:17, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * For all we know, he could use a fire hose to put out the reaction :3 Ajraddatz Talk 01:19, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, if the reaction has died down sufficiently, and the hose shoots heavy water (dideuterium oxide), then technically it could work. 01:20, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmpf, all lies. We don't even know exactly what type of energy is released from a nuclear reaction (we call it nuclear radiation for lack of a better term), or for that matter what even happens during a nuclear reaction. All we know is that it breaks apart the bonds in the nucleus, and does big boom. BIIIIIIG BOOM. Ajraddatz Talk 01:25, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahh gluons. Pesky little things, aren't they? Well, the boom is fun, at least, especially when I drop it on certain pages. 01:28, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Block
In my opinion, it fully does matter how tiny an offense is (or if that edit could even be termed as one, I would prefer to give the IP the benefit of the doubt here). Unless the history is extensive and the IP has constantly vandalised, I will not block for extremely minor edits such as those. Thanks. 14:29, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Why did I remove what?

Re:Umm
Something may be amiss there, but I've killed corp quite a bit, and those drop rates and reasonably accurate. He drops 13 charms at a time. They are obviously not perfect, but it's better to give a rough idea than just have all say 0-73% chance which doesn't help anyone. 23:54, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe, it's no problem, when I was looking at the history, I believe it showed 1 charm at one point, which may have thrown you off. But whatever, it's cool. 23:57, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Also, you were right, the other day I was being a dick about rollback, I'm sorry. You know way more about anti-vandal, I was just way too involved. 00:03, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

etc
????????? What ????????? 00:58, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * pfft, amtuaerar 01:14, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion
You might know of this already but Quarenon has a neat template inserter script called Templates Toolbar. You should take a look at it. Disregard if you already know. 03:27, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I do actually, although thanks for pointing it out anyways :) Ajraddatz Talk 03:29, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

RS:AGF
This user wasn't really vandalising by adding the weight of the item. They probably didn't know where to put the weight, and there is certainly no point of scaring them by telling them that they are a vandal. You are supposed to Assume good faith anyways. 19:28, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am assuming good faith; I have warned the guys twice. However, one should also take into account his contributions, as well as the fact that 1kg isn't correct for that article. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 19:31, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * How do you know that 1kg wasn't right for that article? Also, there were only 2 vandal edits, and one of them could easily have been done by mistake, meaning that there is only one serious vandal edit. Seriously, there is no need to scare them off. 19:33, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is not my intention to scare him off, or to not assume good faith. At any rate, the edit was not productive (neither were the other three that he has made), and it should be up to him to learn how to properly contribute to the wiki. Although, if he was trying to put in the correct price, I can see why he did what he did. The RTE doesn't allow for easy template editing. Perhaps I was wrong with this warning. Ajraddatz Talk 19:37, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Meh, just be moar understanding the next time you warn someone . 19:39, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, I just did. That IP just vandalized my userpage, but I warned him again instead of reporting. I assume that he did that as a result of my warning, hence the response. Ajraddatz Talk 19:40, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why did you add If you think that there is something missing from this userpage, feel free to edit it!  anyways?  19:43, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I started doing that on the My LEGO Network Wiki a while ago. No, it is not to promote vandalism (lul), it is mainly because I never update my userpage, and enjoy reading what people add to it. Except for vandalism >.> - I also don't like the idea of my userpage being just mine; this is a wiki, and there is an Edit this page button on userpages for a reason. Ajraddatz Talk 19:45, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see. 19:48, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ooh, that reminds me... Check the YG please. Ajraddatz Talk 19:55, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

About the vandalism I reported...
I had attempted to warn him first and then warn that other IP whose edits to the Fish Flingers page were reverted by another user, but it seems I managed to place the warning on the wrong IP's userpage. Hopefully I won't get ahead of myself when warning possible vandals next time... 21:52, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, thanks for your counter-vandalism efforts at any rate. Ajraddatz Talk 21:53, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'm always glad to help revert vandalism, even if I sometimes mix things up by accident. Next time I'll make sure not to place the warning on the wrong talk page . 21:55, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mistakes happen; trust me, I know :) Ajraddatz Talk 21:56, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Lol
I hate it when the revisions shift like that. You need to stop being so fast -- 03:35, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh oh... -- 03:42, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * why? -- 02:17, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * No harm done -- 02:23, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

I've been more active in the CC as of late, so I figured it couldn't hurt to add my name. -- 00:45, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Teh block
Sorry, I must've forgotten. Could you post their contribs link on my talk page so I can take another look? Thanks, 18:06, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

VDA Script
Hey i tried installing your script, but it doesnt work  20:49, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, it only works on Chrome and FF (to the best of my knowledge). If you are using one of those, please try a hard refresh. If not, then sorry, I'll look at it and see what might be wrong. Ajraddatz Talk 20:51, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ummmmm for some reason it just randomly started working....im using safari by the way 19:46, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's good :) Ajraddatz Talk 19:49, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, in safari and chrome, it works once ive refresed the page once, but it does work in firefox....thats odd >.> 19:54, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: O_o
Lol, I sure would. 21:28, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Auto CVU
Um, is the Upgraded Auto CVU and the regular Auto CVU the same now? 04:09, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, quarquar included that in his version after a discussion about it on the IRC. Ajraddatz Talk 04:21, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Useless Requests for Comment
There is no need to add RFC's to Yew Grove threads. The intention of the template is to attract attention to discussion pages that would otherwise go unnoticed, a purpose which cannot be filled by the template on the Yew Grove as it's constantly being checked. I removed one of them and plan to remove the others, unless you have a strong reason as to why they should stay. 19:45, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was using them because obviously people were not noticing/commenting on the forums in question, and they have been going on for a while and should be closed soon. Feel free to remove them if you so desire, although I'm not the only one who uses them on the forums. Ajraddatz Talk 19:48, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
Hey Ajraddatz ever consider being an admin? I'd be happy to nominate you! -- 19:58, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the offer, but at the time I think I'm fine with the rights that I have at the moment. Ajraddatz Talk 19:59, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * You'd make a good admin but alright then 20:02, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * It means a lot more to me to know that people trust me than to have the extra tools. Thanks again, but I will still need to decline. Ajraddatz Talk 20:04, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you ever do decide to start an RfA, let me know. I believe you would be an excellent candidate. Also, if I made a signature template for you, would you use it. Sorry, it annoys me. I'll deal with it if you don't want me to. (Like if I just put the user/talk links in a template for you.) 21:07, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * lol at the signature, I was just about to start using my templated sig again, actually (although thanks for the offer). Thanks for your support as well; like I said above, it means a lot to me that people trust and respect me. Best of luck with your RfA. 22:02, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks  22:04, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * By the way, sexy siggy, Ajraddatz :P 03:58, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks :) 03:59, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

I like your signature.
It's eye-catching without being gaudy... Nice job! Leftiness 04:33, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, thanks. 04:35, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * So... I kind of like your sig so much I had to steal it... Hope you don't mind... I changed it a bit. :D Tell me if you do mind. -- 05:41, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not at all, and you aren't the first one who has copied me ;) 13:36, May 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I stole the idea, also. 22:40, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

RevisionDelete
Hey Ajraddatz, before I close Forum:Policy for Special:RevisionDelete, I would like to ask exactly where the changes were implemented. Thanks. 09:59, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE:IP Infablock
Shows what I know about computers, that's all news to me. Feel free to tell the ip otherwise, but I have never seen a user with such a long offense history. How long should the block be, then? 11:06, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re:??
It's been months since his last contribution; for all we know it's a totally different user. Replacing "trap" with "crap" is hardly major vandalism, if it continues I'll block him. -- 17:43, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re:lulz
[] -- 21:22, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 21:26, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Exchange:Elemental talisman vandal
Doesn't look like vandalism as the first could be the update for a different item and the second is the the max limit for that item (well, off by one coin). 16:26, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * This is an interesting case, which upon further examination I would call good faith, partcially. The first edit, replacing the price which should have been in the 5,000s with 81,337 was not an honest mistake. It was either blatant vandalism, or a test edit. However, after the warning, the IP did then go and place what he thought was the "correct price" in - not realizing that it was incorrect. You're right, that IP shouldn't have been reported, although there is no disputing the first edit; for one thing, it had 1337 in it. It is also 75,000 off. Definitely made in bad faith, or as a test, although the second was not. 18:02, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

AWB
I've already applied, and one of the admins of the community central has asked for an "Runescape admin" to confirm and approve of it, Like 7 or so applications below, you can see Quarnenon approving someone else =p 22:43, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * OIC, never mind then :P 22:44, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * ;D 22:45, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Removal of Ads
I deleted it before anyone had time to comment to get around RS:DDD seeing as how I noticed we don't qualify for the program a few seconds after hitting the save button. I am pretty sure I mentioned that in my delete summery, so there was no need to drop me that message. 21:31, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, I doubt they would allow us to participate in it anyway, considering we are one of the much larger wikis and are probably making Wikia quite a bit more wealthy with no monetary reward on our part. 21:36, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

wat
wat life???? I spent $250 (about 15 games). No life, not one planned ever. 21:41, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * you gotta have at least 1 friend to have a social life or get invited to places. My # is around  00:04, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * It should say negative infinity. 00:15, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you're an internet friend, which means I know nothing about you, and anything you say about yourself there is no way to prove, and vice-versa. I have no real friends. 00:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but that's the internet for you. 00:24, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * im steve jobes -- 00:32, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * yes iam@@@@@ -- 00:44, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * proff -- 00:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * moar proff -- 00:54, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
It doesn't matter, thanks for reverting it back and telling me. 14:01, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

3rd age farcaster
thanks. im not sure im going to do it, as long as im not breaking any rules ill stay on this account at least 4 now. may want that account again in the future though, so ty again. 3AF

Oops
Yeah, sorry about that. I thought it would revert to that version, but I guess it just undid that part :/  21:20, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. It looks like the editor is trying to help here, and all of the errors are are occurring look like RTE issues. 21:23, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah...I think so, I'm pretty sure I fixed them all (after like 5 edit conflicts lol).  21:25, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn you RTE! Damn you to HELL!  Hooray for edit conflicts when editing this ^_^    21:26, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weeeeeeee edit conflicts XD 21:25, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Wait, what?
Check it out, a slang for soil composite does not exist :D Coelacanth0794 02:09, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * :O - lol. 02:11, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

NO SIR. YOU MUST REWRITE THAT ARTICLE BECAUSE IT SUCKS MADE ME HAVE TO GO BACK TO CANIFIS, TWICE.

BECAUSE THE GUIDE IS SO FUCKING BAD

Re:Undid revision 2748478 by Coelacanth0794 (Talk)
I lol'd Coelacanth0794 02:53, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * But it was 1 GP! It was humourous :D:D:D:D:D Coelacanth0794 02:54, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * As long as you don't snort kitten like above, I'll be content. Coelacanth0794 02:56, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: DW
Very much so. >:O The Pandorica will open. 17:48, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm two weeks behind thanks to Memorial Day and BBCAmerica. >:(( The Pandorica will open. 17:52, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ouch! :( The Pandorica will open. 17:55, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: 23:43 . . Tienjt0 (Talk | contribs) unblocked #48311 (Should have unchecked this, right?)
Sweet, just making sure. I've never blocked an actual user before. 23:47, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, just did. 23:50, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

ahem
Be careful who you're warning. He was undoing that vandalism -- 01:47, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * You editconflicted me while I was crossing out the warning D: 01:49, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fail, sorry about that -- 01:51, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe, but editconflicts are fuuuuunnnnn 01:52, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * ... Nah, more likely I'm crazy. I must be spending too much time around wojwoj again. 01:53, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Personally I find that to be a funny comment, But I do see where you're coming from; I'll tone it down in the future. -- 19:18, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 19:22, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Archive
Eventually. I'm lazy. And that creates issues. I'd rather slay atm. 03:33, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Screenshot
It was technically an elitism moment, which technically does tie into RS:AEAE, Ill provide it whenever possible 14:13, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
Oops. I guess I just fail. 03:51, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, don't worry about it. At least I finished it. Wasn't really an AWB thing, more of a misunderstanding the use of the template.  03:57, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Monkey in your backpack
That was on honest mistake on my part. I was trying to click something else from RC and accidentally rolled that back. Sorry for that. 20:58, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Sergeants
It is important to understand what a sergeant is, and what their role is, before considering if there are too many ranks with sergeant in their name. Because I am tired I am going to be way too brief. Sergeants are leaders, they work with and side by side with their troops, carrying out their commanders orders, fulfilling their commanders intent. Not to castigate officers, as their role is very different, but they are not often viewed as leaders, at least not as a group. Many of them as individuals certainly are, but that is a side point. Keeping the sergeant in part of the rank name is a reminder to everyone of what they are. In case you have never heard of it, here is the NCO creed.

NCO Creed


 * No one is more professional than I. I am a Noncommissioned Officer, a leader of soldiers. As a Noncommissioned Officer, I realize that I am a member of a time honored corps, which is known as "The Backbone of the Army". I am proud of the Corps of Noncommissioned Officers and will at all times conduct myself so as to bring credit upon the Corps, the Military Service and my country regardless of the situation in which I find myself. I will not use my grade or position to attain pleasure, profit, or personal safety.


 * Competence is my watchword. My two basic responsibilities will always be uppermost in my mind -- accomplishment of my mission and the welfare of my soldiers. I will strive to remain technically and tactically proficient. I am aware of my role as a Noncommissioned Officer. I will fulfill my responsibilities inherent in that role. All soldiers are entitled to outstanding leadership; I will provide that leadership. I know my soldiers and I will always place their needs above my own. I will communicate consistently with my soldiers and never leave them uninformed. I will be fair and impartial when recommending both rewards and punishment.


 * Officers of my unit will have maximum time to accomplish their duties; they will not have to accomplish mine. I will earn their respect and confidence as well as that of my soldiers. I will be loyal to those with whom I serve; seniors, peers, and subordinates alike. I will exercise initiative by taking appropriate action in the absence of orders. I will not compromise my integrity, nor my moral courage. I will not forget, nor will I allow my comrades to forget that we are professionals, Noncommissioned Officers, leaders!

So no, I do not think it is used in too many ranks. Each rank is important and has unique responsibilities, but each of them is a sergeant.--Degenret01 03:09, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Beer glass
That edit was right. >.<  20:04, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lrn2(insert verb here) 20:07, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

Lolk. 20:08, June 20, 2010 (UTC) ^_^ 20:25, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

== Hai Adrian Raddatz I'm making a long heading so your table of contents will take up the entire width of the talk page because it's father's day and Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's father. Noooooo!!!! ==

stfuoiwhuitroul. 20:36, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * hai do i no u???// 20:36, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/3204/why1q.jpg

lolwut
"They are also delicious to eat with shark." = NPOV ??? Did you read the article? 16:18, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did. Is that not NPOV? I suppose one could say that it was just vandalism... but still. I guess I see what you're saying :P 16:24, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Edits by Special:Contributions/65.25.150.60
Please remember to Assume good faith when dealing with IPs. They contribute a significant proportion of our editor base and should not be met with the threat of a block when their edits are poorly formatted at worst. 01:27, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do accept my apologies, I misread his edit to Troll as "An example of an internet troll is a person who posted this message saying that if you read this page you have no life." I didn't cotton on to the fact that he was referring to himself. Too early in the morning and not enough coffee! Regards, 01:34, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re:IRC
Not to sound curmudgeonly, but... why? 05:50, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... I prefer to be mysterious. 05:55, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

i wrote the thing about hunter kits, and that was my signature@!!@!@!@!@!@!

Re:.css sig
I realised after I changed all the coding. I cbs fixing it though, and the .css works just fine anyhow. Not only that, when I do update my signature, the old "/sig" will stay old, which makes it look more styled/antique-ish I guess  05:32, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

Pie!
Are you planning on using the cvu users cat? If not, imma throw a large pie at it. 11:07, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * *Nomz wojowj's pie, adds category to his userpage* 23:08, June 26, 2010 (UTC)

== Re:http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=RuneScape:Counter-Vandalism_Unit&diff=2829919&oldid=282989987394087209345760194637816384095691736450817634987561346958716938476519873649857169837465897163 ==

WHAT IS THIS I DON'T EVEN -- 00:12, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * WHAT IS THIS I DON'T EVEN -- 00:22, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * lulz -- 17:11, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Hai
HAo r u, adradfraegvedvtz? 00:46, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sigh, such drama we have to deal with. I wish I could ban them both and be done with it. 02:55, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, can you webcite this? Dragon defender (Well, I am not good at this so I hope admins will edit this later, they are coming out with one and here is the proof, http://www.youtube.com/user/thejagexchannel?blend=1&ob=4, but make sure you go to Page 7 on the Comment Page Section, and read the JagexChannels comment back to the players) I don't know what the url for the comments are, so I can't do it.  02:56, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Cause they think they can whine here and have it undone. Oh, the page is here. 03:00, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought I did, but it didn't go through, again. Had to click block 3 more times. 03:09, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have msn, I'd rather use that. 03:15, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also still waiting on teh linky 03:15, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * me no likey irc, but meh. 03:19, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Botness
Can specific groups be added to the feed? RIght now it only seems to get ips. I was thinking about it also catching edits made by non-autoconfirmed users. 10:26, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also what about certain phrases and stuff? Does it support regexes or maybe plain text matching? Also copyvio makes little sense is terms of this wiki, it should go away. Also it doesn't correctly notice a page blank or decrease, it just says summary blank. It should I dunno make them red or something. I have many more ideas, but I'll like to talk to you when you are awake. 12:50, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Chia's talk page
Sorry it just looked like vandalism because of how it was written and the IP had a warning, which RS:DDD allows you to delete. 03:50, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see why you did what you did. I know that RS:DDD allows for the removal of vandalism, but well, I kinda felt like linking to it anyways. Be more careful next time, and I promise I will be as well ;) 03:51, June 28, 2010 (UTC)

Just wondering why you sent me a message about vandalism?

I have a question
(cur) (prev) 11:04, 29 June 2010 Haloolah123 (Talk | contribs) m (1,128 bytes) (moved Unicorn foal to Unicorn Foal over redirect) (undo | report)

I thought only sysops could move over redirect, and it's always stopped me in the past. As far as I know I'm not a sysop...so...do you have any idea on why it let me? 16:53, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, you are kind of right. If a page was created, then moved to a different name (such as Unicorn Foul to unicorn foul), then only a sysop can move it back to Unicorn Foul, deleting the existing Unicorn Foul page (which is only a redirect) at the same time. However, if a page was created as a redirect, then any user or sysop can move the page to it, such as you did. 17:25, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I get it, thanks. 17:27, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Editing
How can it be disruptive if it's a fact? Just because you don't know something doesn't make it false. Please leave the edit alone as it isn't breaching any rules and is 100% real. I know loads of people who call dungeoneering grift simply because they don't want to sound like a weirdo saying "dung".

AGF
While this may seem like vandalism for you, I really wouldn't consider it warn worthy. You could instead just tell him that you don't allow price manipulation or clans on this wiki. Just remember Assume Good Faith. 05:07, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea, I know about the private messaging to the cc, but you never know if the IP was just editing to mention that it is currently being merched or something. 06:18, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Glad you stuck
Hey Ajr, just wanted to say I am glad you stuck around after that rocky start. --Degenret01 14:12, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Um..
I'm a user here, and I forgot my password. I'd like to talk to you ingame, please. Nothing bad, just a quick word. Iggytoad is the name.

Iggy

nou
nou 02:20, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

amg talk page stalker halp@@@
Oh I know that, I was trying to figure out how to do it using PHP regular expressions for my minion. 04:19, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to report you to the talk page police.  04:23, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Btw, I know others have tried to convince you before, but would you consent to an RfA? 04:28, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did someone call me? Hahaha. 04:31, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Bahahaha, nice one Powers. I didn't even have to alert you  04:31, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Aaarrg *hides* 04:33, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, let me know if you ever change your mind, though. 04:32, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=Granite&diff=2850151&oldid=2850147
This has been in a minimized tab for weeks... -- 19:33, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * p.s. i lol'd -- 19:33, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * </3 -- 15:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Replacing Sig
I'm done anyways. I just didn't want to have 2 sigs and confuse people (and I didn't know if they didn't have that policy there.) It was probably due to the fact that I believe I edited an archived forum. I'm sorry if I caused any problems. Also, gratz on 7777 edits. 17:03, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I'm done. And my settings are pretty much set up globally now...it's easier to use other wikis...I might actually start editing them more now.  (*Realizes how much of a protected world this wiki is*)   17:11, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

Adminship
Thanks a lot for the offer. I think I'm going to make a test wiki and dink around. If I run into any problems, I'll ask ^_^ 00:06, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal
I did check the contribs, but I misread the date of your warning, and thought that you had just added it that day. I never block anyone who hasn't got at least one warning. If I had noticed that it was added a while ago, I would have blocked. 00:13, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Too little too late! Barrack Obama cannot be stopped once he gets angry! 03:55, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:A wild brown haired female appears...
Miss me? -- 03:19, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I like to be descriptive -- 03:28, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Warning
i was removing the sugestion to delet system 32 folder

nightgazer
sorry was trying to get the info above the selection menu thing, it didn't work out :[

Doctah
Thanks to the Fourth of July 'celebrations', I still haven't seen The Lodger, much less the two-parter. :'(( The Pandorica will open. 16:40, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I sob into my Frosted Mini Wheats every morning. *wails* The Pandorica will open. 16:42, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * y tank u koind sah The Pandorica will open. 16:45, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Careful there
Argh, I'm really sorry. I saw an IP changing the price without changing anything else and thought that they were making it incorrect. I'll be sure to make sure that I'm undoing correctly in the future. 21:13, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Don't do this
It is not true, and you know it. There is no policy that says so on this wiki. There are only guidelines. When you say something like that, it undermines our abilities. So don't. 06:03, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * He's right you know. I personally think people should be warned at least once, but there's really nothing to say that they are obligated to do so. To be honest I think I'm pretty naive in giving people warnings. Most of the time they're ignored and they keep on vanadlising.  06:05, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't mean it that way... I should have said "recommended" instead of "supposed". Also, you would be surprised at how well warnings can work. They obviously don't work against serious vandals, but they usually dissuade the good faith people. Anyways, sorry about that - I do know the policies. That was a bad choice of words. 13:58, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Nowiki userpages
-- 18:47, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE: First didn't continue after warning...
All I saw was the timestamps were the same so I assumed he didn't see the warning, but mmk. 22:17, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

damn pie
i dun want urs, its all ndisgusting. 00:05, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
If you let me nominate you for admin I'll give you one of these. 20:27, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well alright then..*puts on srs face* it's off to the salt mines with you! 20:28, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * There's always the coal mines! 20:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * RfA or bust! 20:34, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why would people oppose you, sir? 20:37, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * HE ALREADY HAS YOUR NOMINATION WRITTEN AND HE'S ITCHING TO PRESS THE SAVE PAGE BUTTON!!! 20:37, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

DBAB
...because DBAD is such an academically minded policy to begin with >_> 20:36, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Zezima edit
Thanks for notifying him. I wonder why he did that :P? 480 edits... Mark ( talk ) 21:04, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nobody touches my userpage . My guess is that it's his brother/sister vandalising... That makes most sense. Mark  ( talk ) 21:08, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Stuff you said
1. I don't mean to be brash, but I don't particularly care if you think they deserved a block or not, I didn't. 2. Perhaps I was not clear when I posted. I do not mean to say that people following AGF are being naive, I meant to say that people who assume that the gemw vandalism will just disappear with the price limits in place are being naive. It turns into edits that we can't tell from normal mistakes, which is an unsustainable system, since it doesn't lead to vandals being separated from well-intending editors and blocked. I find it a bit ironic that you decide I need a lecture in AGF when you want to block a vandal after two edits so minor that they barely qualify as vandalism at all. 22:03, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am not going to make the argument that what he did was not vandalism. But it was such a minor occurance I do not believe it warranted a block. Look at his first edit, all he did was put his opinion into it. And I can see how he could think that. Is it really worth it to hunt down someone with the levels to get assist so you can get a few thousand exp? Probably not unless you know someone. So it warranted a reminder about NPOV and not much else. So really he only had one real vandalism edit. 22:16, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you care too much. Not caring is the best thing you can do. For example you care too much if someone you report to the cvu gets blocked or not. I noticed that its not just with me. I don't think you should, because 1.) if they don't get blocked and just leave then there's no harm done and 2.) if they don't get blocked and they vandalise again, then they definitely get blocked and reverting their edits takes under a second. So ultimately it doesn't matter. It'd also help in yew grove discussions. Because if you don't get your way, does it really matter? In things like AEAE and AGF it really doesn't, because no matter what peoples' interpretations of those policies are, its not going to affect your editing. For the longest time I fought to keep a clause in the image policy that stopped people from garbing their characters up in whatever flashy annoying distracting outfit was their favorite in images they took. After a while of arguing with the people who didn't think it should be that way, I saw it wasn't going anywhere so I just gave up. Complete capitulation. And I'm glad I did! Now every time I see someone upload a new image wihth some ridiculous flashy outfit, I just tell myself to not give a Cabbage.PNG and I don't, and then I go about whatever I was doing before. So I highly advise you to care less. 23:58, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Pie@@@
here is gud. 22:41, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

[]
No stupid discussion pages that are too large for me to save  23:34, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE: http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=Gout_tuber&curid=13099&diff=2888395&oldid=2888373
No worries. 00:08, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re:User:Aburnett/Survey
-- 16:54, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

RFB
Hey, you have to add a variation of the word "extreamly" to your vote on the RFB or else it doesn't count. 18:35, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. 18:50, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nononono you did it wrong. You spelled extreamly the wrong way.  For some correct examples, see the other comments on the RFB.   18:54, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * ._. - I'm a nub at this D: 18:55, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Muddle
I was editing the page it was all muddled up so i put it correct so things dont overlap each other.

Userpage
It made me Lol. 23:58, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

nobody cares
Holy crap that was great. I should visit uncyclopedia more.--Degenret01 14:58, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * WOW! That took me back and made me very nostalgic Rofl. Thanks.--Degenret01 15:22, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:

 * Btw, have you heard about the word? Mark  ( talk ) 00:01, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2WNrx2jq184#t=0m27s (Can't set time :(.) Mark  ( talk ) 00:06, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

Eh?
I didn't make any edit tbh. All I've done today was be nosy in Aburnett's talk page, and look through a few of the glitch pages.

I dunno, maybe you got the wrong IP, or maybe it got reassigned.

Anyhoo, just saying I didn't even visit that page, let alone update it. Laters.

- 7th October

Re:Re: I'm new at this
What If I uploaded a picture of my charicter making a funny face or lookin surprised? Then it could be used by other people for humor right? Because i've browsed through the picture department and have found plenty of pictures of other charicters.

RE: Hai
Not to my knowledge, but I'm usually in Mod Calm's cc nowadays, and I've spent some time in #XDaniel and #ZybezRadio on SwiftIRC... 08:06, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

nou
Cuz I wanted to. WAnna fite about it? Ill kill u ded. Also cuz my page is perfect as it is, anything ruins teh beauty. 15:22, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * nowai i pro. i so pro i keel u bai eating ur fingernail. tats hao pro im am. 17:11, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * even teh oters haet u. also ur ded, u just dont no it yet, so ur alife for teh momnt. 06:35, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * ur a nub nd every1 hars u. alsi mai talk iz fein, so stfu nd die#######@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 09:16, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * naver will mai talk be acriveded. not in v35267386975395609357oewretws4738658iyjgfny6i545e yrs. 14:14, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * yas its real. U nevur herd of that? ijit. 10:28, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Warning
Due to your recent and continuing vandalism, it has been decided you will get no pie until such time your vandalism stops. If you wish to appeal this pieban, please fill out the form here. 23:19, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Rackafrack
You are such a wonderful person. I love you.

Have a nais vaction 01:04, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am joking. You are an awful person and should die in a small hole. 01:05, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

AMG HALP@@@@@@@@@@@
http://i537.photobucket.com/albums/ff331/Soldier_1033/Screenshot2010-07-20at35731AM.png

MASS PANIC IN THE STREETS PLS 09:10, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Great Work
Thanks! I'm high alching, talking to my girlfriend, and browsing, and just happened to see some edits that needed to be reverted. Ninja like reflexes, and all that. 00:38, July 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * I didn't know that! Thanks! 15:44, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
That makes more sense. See my edit on the topic. 19:36, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Edits
I'm removing whitespace, that page went from 1,235 bytes to 1,178 bytes which -57 bytes, not a lot but no needed. 20:57, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

OHAI
So i here ur bak from teh ded@@@@@@@@ 14:23, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * hai 14:24, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Message
You might not know what i mean but i will say it regardless, i updated the ge price but i made a missclick i clicked the wrong thing to update and as soon as i realised what i had done i tried to re-edit my mistake however i was confronted with an error stopping me doing this. I tried several times to correct it but an error message still prevented me.

It wasn't intentional.

My bad
Sorry about calling the article vandalism, and thanks for deleting it. 20:17, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ip spambot
Noooo! I can't afford to waste my time since its so valuable! 20:19, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Too late!!! что-то случится с вами, что вы не хотели, и это не может быть предотвращено. В следующий раз, может быть, вы будете думать, более тщательно, о чем вы собираетесь сказать, прежде чем сказать. 20:26, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Mah siggeh
Why thank yew. :D THE TIME LORD VICTORIOUS 17:23, July 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
I have no issue with it, feel free.-- 20:21, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
It's fine with me. 20:23, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead, I don't mind. 20:24, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Me neither. 20:32, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

I've had e-mail ever since I started and have never been spammed. Feel free to set it up. =) 20:34, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Fine with me! ;) THE TIME LORD VICTORIOUS 20:51, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, but I don't check it very often. Any users interested in contacting me would get a much faster response by posting on my talk page. 20:55, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead. 20:59, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

No problem. -- 21:41, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

I never use mine and I disabled the ability to be emailed by other users a long time ago. Like what Psycho said—getting messaged here would be much more efficient. 21:51, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Fine with me - 21:55, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Mmk - Per all. 21:56, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

What's it for? -- 22:44, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * I never check mine. :O -- 23:09, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Fien - Works for me. 22:57, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing If there is a comment section though it may be worth noting I only check it once a week.--Degenret01 01:54, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fine with it, go ahead. 06:36, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

^ Dtm142 02:55, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

wat u say
No gtfo u nub#@@@@@@@@@ 21:44, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * also, wai u ues a copy paste on mai page??????????? i shuld stab u fur it. 21:46, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * amg ur maeking threatesn? 01:05, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * weeeeeeweeeeeeweeeeelllllll ill unblak myself and conititu vadling ur paeg 01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)01:08, August 1, 2010 (UTC)~

Re:Email Link
Sure. 23:10, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
Sure, fine by me. 00:26, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

That would be fine. I already have a wikia/spam e-mail address with no personal information attached to it for that sort of thing. 00:41, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

what is this i dont even... oh wait yeah sure go ahead 01:13, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sure. Go ahead. Dave Lopo 01:14, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fine by me. -- 04:13, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sure! Although I rather let them use my talk :S 07:58, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * ^That 10:37, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

I very, very rarely use my e-mail address, as a result of a preference fail that has left me with thousands of e-mails. However, I suppose I could check more often, so sure. 10:50, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I don't mind. 15:18, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

UOTM
You've been nominated to be the user of the month. 05:26, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 15:36, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

_
After you revamped RS:A, the tables show the names of sysops with underscores instead of spaces. Since names are not supposed to have underscores in them, I tried removing them, but without the underscores in the names, the email link showed up as junk. I assume that this is due to something in the RSADMIN template, but since I have no idea what it is, do you mind fixing it? If it's not possible, then it's alright, since they're not that annoying. 22:33, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Blahblah
It no matter. Azaz blokk heem anywoos. 23:39, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Bah! You edit conflict'd me to remove the underscores and I didn't notice till after I bragged on helmhead's page that I removed them. Now it looks like I tried to take credit for your work! Which is just... awesome. 23:44, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * NO! I WAS SAYING THAT IT IS AWESOME THAT IT LOOKS LIKE I TRIED TO TAKE CREDIT FOR YOUR WORK. DON'T TWIST MY WORDS YOU ADDLE-BRAINED STRUMPET!!! 23:48, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its things like this why I think you're an addle-brained strumpet. 23:50, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://lmgtfy.com/?q=definition+of+addle http://lmgtfy.com/?q=definition+of+strumpet 23:55, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Email
I rather not. Sorry. 00:52, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Maldición le Narb!
I edit conflicted with you, may you suffer my translated spanish...¬¬ 14:56, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sí! Eso es lo que obtienes por ser tan rápido y compra hardrives cool y Artes y otras cosas inútiles que ayuda su edición, está furioso con usted, puede ir y tienen un chapuzón en una bukkit.... 15:01, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Spanish iletimde başarısız söyledim, ı 'm konuşmak için bir dilde iyi, Türk biliyorum. Sen cant yapmak, bahis super-noob. 15:26, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Omg, hypocrite! 10:19, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

You fool!
I moved the page. Mua ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha you got trolled by more appropriate terminology. 00:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE:lol
maibee aye emm Coelacanth0794 19:49, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * ahm just su skaree@@@@@ Coelacanth0794 19:53, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

hai
i has prove tat u r stupoder tan me@@@@@@@@ 00:06, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * no ur a nub  00:08, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re:RS:RFD
The boxes don't fit well together, plus having everything separated in its own box makes the top of the page feel to choppy and broken up. Also, resize your browser window. People with smaller monitors and different resolutions are going to see something completely different (and not in a good way). -- 02:29, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your wish be mah command. -- 02:51, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed image, idk what that was... -- 02:51, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Er... they don't. At least not on firefox. I tested it myself and it works perfectly. 03:29, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn right you won't, you got showed the [[File:Cabbage.PNG]] up! 17:15, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RfA comment thing
That 222 guy. Btw, is the sitenotice gone for you too? 16:07, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

wtf?
>_> 16:14, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, forgot the .gif. 16:16, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wth does that have to do with circus agility emote? >_< 16:17, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is an image of somebody standing on a tight rope in full agility circus gear in the circus preforming an emote. 16:19, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm extremely confused right now. Isn't this what you see? I'm seeing a bandos platebody there >_< 16:20, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that's what I see. There might be some weird Wikia server issues though, and since I'm on a different server than you, that might be the problem. Well, if you see a bandos plate there, then I'll believe you :P 16:22, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Meh, that's an interesting bug imho. 16:24, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've asked Wikia about it, and they tell me that it's the same datacenter issue as the one that is hiding the sitenotice. Oh well, it will be fixed. 16:24, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving now. You might want to ask someone else what they see there O_O 16:25, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

It's a bandos platebody...but I (could) see how someone (might) think it (could possibly be) some form of stick figure who is doing some sort of flip and it currently upside down, with some curtains on the top corners. But it is indeed a bandos platebody. 16:32, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see a completely different image there; no chance of it being a bandos plate. It is datacenter issues, most likely with the Canadian server. Thanks for the feedback. 16:37, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

thanks
i just got on randomly to check my page and saw that you had prohibited a noob from violating my page and i just wanted to say thanks

03:53, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome :) 03:54, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: :o
LOL. I'm only updating the Exchange pages... since there was a major update in RS. Lots of new items! =) 01:33, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Spam =/= Trolling
Nope. When I say it will be considered "spam", I mean that any further comments will be considered off topic, irrelevant, and on par to simply making three lines of "@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@" as a response. Trolling on the other hand is the intentional disruption of a community, since I'm assuming they are well-intentioned, the term wouldn't aptly apply.-- 02:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 03:04, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, as to the spam topic, I believe that the issue is simply we're using two different, though similar, definitions.-- 03:10, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Signatures and userpage
I'm convinced it is due to the new datacenters and your userpage isn't kind to Monobook or Wikiaphone at all (my preferred skin and iPhone), just so you know. Worst case scenario, delete and restore a single revision. 03:13, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, hopefully the change Joe just made will help.-- 03:21, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wondered what Joe was doing. I think I see now... Also, I preferred Monobook because I don't have to suffer through most adverts, "holiday" events on this Wiki, page take-over ads, and it's not the norm now. 03:26, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

sorry
sorry for editing kree'arra drop rate. i'm currently soloing kree'arra and thought that page wanted me help.