User talk:Azliq7

First of all ...

The word "you"
Hey, you added some good stuff to the scabarites page, looks good. But remember we are not supposed to use the word "you" in articles. Say things like "the player". This is only fr articles of course, not talk pages.--Degenret01 07:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey, since I told you that a month ago thre is now a new discussion taking place regarding how to properly write articles over on RuneScape:Yew_grove. Whether you have any input or not it will prove to be a good discussion, because it is being solidly proposed instead of simply suggested, that we include this type of thing in the RS:SG.--Degenret01 13:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

MEp II
I saw you just finished the quest Mournings End Part II, and? What do you think of the quest?

BTW, i got my quest cape at 95 combat, and finished RFD at 89 combat =D

Anyway, good luck dude!

14:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it wasn't as tough as I thought. Only DT and RFD to go.  I'm taking a break from quests atm, more training to do.  Currently 94 combat.  Thanks (for the luck)!

RE:Desert Treasure
I understand that you would be upset about me undoing that edit. I would too! Let me explain a bit. The reason I undid the entire edit was because in all, there too many things (in my opinion) that went amiss in the edit. Now, your edit was an absolutely enormous one, leaving almost no line untouched, and so to simply undo a couple of your many edits would have been impossible. Therefore, I undid the entire edit, and started adding back the good edits piece by piece. I only got two of them done so far, but remember: your edits are still preserved in the edit history! You can feel free to readd the content contributions piece by piece, but I would always suggest making small edits over enormous ones.

Here are the reasons why I undid the edit:
 * You added many instances of "The player". I know you have been instructed to do so in the past, but even those instructions (which I disagree with completely) should have only applied to instances where there were "you"s.  You changed things like:
 * Travel to Varrock (which is considered to be best practice), to this:
 * The player should travel to Varrock.
 * There were some seemingly small edits that you made which in fact made the statement contrary to what it previously meant.

So, let's let the YG discussion go for a while, but remember, your edits are still safe in the history. Here's a link to it:. As you can see, I didn't simply undo your edit and that was it. I actually spent almost 45 minutes trying to weed out the good from the bad, but then realized it would take all night and called it quits. 21:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

removing content
Why are you removing the content of talk pages??

08:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm removing irrelevant content that I think is obsolete. Anyways, I'm allowed to remove my own comments right?


 * That is correct 08:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Thanks. =)
 * I appreciate every bit of help I can get on projects.

Re: Detail images
You'll love this. I was trying to figure out how to automatically parse a few pages out of the RS GE DB pages (namely flax, coal, maples, and nests as those are my usual reward from the Thrones of Misc./Etc. which i usually quickly sell at the GE). That was when i noticed a link in the code for the detail images that show up on the specific pages (which you could also open in Firefox by right clicking the image) all of which are at the same base URL with an ID code to lookup the specific .GIF in their item graphics DB, so i started spelunking and found that all items have a detail image even if you've never seen it the higher numbers are the newer items which tend to have more detail than the older ones such as the Ex-ex-parrot inside the cage (apparently after he un-ceases to live):

http://itemdb-rs.runescape.com/2296_obj_big.gif?id=13334

Of course i like to crop the excess white space and convert to .PNG while i'm cropping since the format is more compact and never had any legal issues. =) 12:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
I wrote why in one of the edit summaries, I suggest you read our policy. Christine 16:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Spell Costs
You could use the preview button, instead of edit and save. And why did you remove the font color red? 03:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I am doing this on some kinda purpose.
 * For your first question, I found that the bottom part of the template in that page are all functionless. So, I was suggesting to remove the ice spells to clear off some memory space. I am not sure whether the preview can do this, since it's about the working of templates, not the page contents itself.  And I found that there is no memory for the templates down the page to work. 
 * For your second question, I do not understand why the number of costs should be in red. For expressing as a loss? For decoration? If you are the latter or have no sufficient reason, the normal text colour of preferred skin should be preferred. 03:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I am sorry that I cannot go with you.
 * Cost is cost, loss is loss. Cost is not loss. How would you define "loss"? How would you define "gain"? With what standard? With what to be compared? The selling price of the spell? No kidding please. The other calculators have two objects to be compared: one is cost of primary material, another one is the selling price of the final product. It is impossible to follow the other calculators to have the loss.
 * Also, the meaning of loss varies with the situations of players. They may think that the experience is worthy of spending that lump of money for buying the runes. Then in that case, it is a GAIN. You cannot cover the minority of some spells and this kinda of player and say that the cost can be nicked as the so-called "loss".
 * Another common case is that, the runes used is crafted by the player himself. Is that LOSS of money again?
 * If the meaning of loss cannot be clearly defined, why do we just keep the text in normal colour?
 * I will try to seek another way to include the deleted items on that page. 05:52, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: Sleeping cap
Done what you want. With the sleeping cap.

09:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Poisoned arrows (p++)
Adamant_arrows_%28p%2B%2B%29

This is the link to the adamant arrows (p++) page, but i didn't use the "+".

Try this: Adamant_arrows_%28p%2B%2B%29

%2b = + %28 = ( %29 = )

06:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Image Upload
Hi Azliq,

I wanted to let you know that I've fixed the problem you reported on RS:YG regarding the Hunter category not being an option. Sorry nobody noticed your post or fixed the problem until now. I've archived the discussion (as little as there was); you can find it at RuneScape:Yew_grove/Archive3. Thanks! 22:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Summoning uses
...I see. I hadn't actually scrolled down to see that. I just figured you put the deletion tag because of his three or so edits, not 20 or however much. 10:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Pluralizing of wikilinks
I have a pet peeve about use of links that have the "s" or whatever outside of the hyperlink. I'm responding on RuneScape talk:Style guide in more depth as I think the guideline you referenced is far from a perfect suggestion and something I happen to strongly disagree with. Still, I thank you for at least bringing it to my attention. --Robert Horning 13:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Safe mode
I would like to commend you on creating this page all by yourself. It is well structured, and the image is of great quality. Keep creating pages like that! €MØŠwô®L[) 10:58, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Agility Pyramid Comment
I noticed a deletion of some data from the Agility Pyramid page and you left a message saying it was 'possible vandalism'. Well the information you changed back was actually correct to my knowledge. The experience points received are now out of date with some obstacles receiving over 50xp for completion. Maybe you could look into this further for me. Thanks.