User talk:Kinglink15

RS:3RR
Please watch your edits to the Armadyl page, so you don't break the policy linked above. 16:46, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

What did I do? I just undid and put his alignment is really law. If I added something else by mistake excuse it then. Kinglink15 (talk) 16:51, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nothing yet, but we're just trying to prevent another edit war. Those things are nasty business and are to be avoided if possible 16:53, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * There's a policy against reverting the same page too many times a day (3 maximum), or simply editing it back to "your" version. And as the other person involved is... notorious for how stubborn he is about these things (there's already an argument going about his involvement in an edit war on another page), I thought it best to inform you of that policy before things went too far. 16:54, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

I was only putting back the alignment I didn't mean no harmKinglink15 (talk) 16:57, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's ok. You're not in trouble. We just wanted to make sure that you didn't accidentally break any policies. In fact by suggesting setting up a talk page you showed you were willing to discuss the issue, which is quite frankly a lot more than some people are willing to do lately 17:05, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Armadyl Alignment
There's already a bit about his alignment on the talk page... You were right... my sources was from the God Letters, apparently.. which is not canonical.

Still, the things you reverted has nothing to do with the part about botany bay. 17:06, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * I thought that is where you got it from. I didn't mean for the confusion.Kinglink15 (talk) 17:12, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, haha, you got me wondering. Thanks ;) 17:14, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Lol, yes please forgive me, it was a guess lol.Kinglink15 (talk) 21:28, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Armadyl
Don´t you think we should delete both those sections about "Corporealists" and "Incorporealists" - or do we really have references? 22:38, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Are they part of teh Gods letter? IF so, then yes, if not, we can keep them, if they were stated in-game and by jagex.Kinglink15 (talk) 22:43, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, we've had similar things like that on the Guthix page too, in the religion section (you can see similar remnants still, compare that with the Armadyl part)... that seemed to be totally made up. I'm afraid this isn't even a non-canonical source but just... fan fiction. DAMN... I wish Jagex had that official lore guide done, I would prefer that over the Charm sprites rework update due tomorrow :P 22:48, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Armadyl, has no sorude for it, then yes we can remove it, but the guthix one is true, There are Chaos Druids, who follow guthix, in the teachnig of Zamorak also. The Anima Mundi is connected to Guthix completely, somethnig he can be alligned to. the Druids respect nature it is proved by their city, and of course how they follow life, only thnig they believe balance a lot. I can change the religion part a bit to make it sound more real,. Kinglink15 (talk) 22:52, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry, "Sorude"? Btw, I'm having deep deep troubles with that... "In the God Letters, Guthix said that Chaos druids believe that by helping Zamorak, they will achieve balance, which has some logic to it, as Saradomin does seem to have a lot more hold over the world." I guess you see why I'm worried by that description... purely based on non-canonic sources. For all we know Chaos Druids are people following Zamorak but using knowledge originally developed by Guthixian druids. Akin to what Sliske convinced Ashuelot Reis to do... 23:06, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Excuse my Typo lol, I mean if there is no ingame proof. Now, I see what you mean, that is a bit confusing there, For Armadyl, is it's source both of them, from the Gods letter? And about Guthix. you have a point, no proof is said that. but it is stated on "players" mostly. so do you wish to keep it, or remove teh two? Kinglink15 (talk) 23:13, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * It's fine, confusion solved ;) idk what I want to do... I guess leaving it there is an option, though part of me would also like to strip everything and start anew and only place sources and citations there. But that gives other problems... some of the FAQs where Osborne did say official lore things have gone lost, similar things may well have happened here (and with the Surpreme Justice thingy). Sorry, idk what I want, except a consistent lore book (which only they can edit) :P 23:20, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * ok, so what about Armadyl? Is "Corporealists" and "Incorporealists" Gods Letter information? Kinglink15 (talk) 23:23, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * No idea where that came from. 23:32, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

I think (I don't know for sure, as I can't find other pre-dating sources... as I said: you might have gone lost) it was entirely made up by RS-fans: see here :S 23:37, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

They copied it off here, so... I suppose we can remove it.Kinglink15 (talk) 23:48, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Guthix
Try reloading the editor. Save any changes you were about to make so that you can copy them after it's reloaded. Hopefully that works. 21:27, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean by reload? Kinglink15 (talk) 21:28, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * As in refresh the page where you were editing it. 21:29, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * I did that a few times, I get stuck and when i go do Visual, it tells me this "=Source mode required=

Rich text editing has been disabled because the page contains complex code. Kinglink15 (talk) 21:30, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's because the visual editor has certain limits. If the page gets to be too long or has too much code, then you can't use the visual editor. I would recommend learning how to use the source code format to edit since the visual editor has many known bugs (see RS:RTE). I'm not sure what exactly is causing the visual editor to not function on that page though. 21:32, April 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * SO I suppose I am stuck there huh?Kinglink15 (talk) 21:34, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it seems like it for now. I'll take a look and see if I can figure out what's causing the issue though. 21:35, April 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok thank you. :)Kinglink15 (talk) 21:37, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks like it's the infobox having multiple options that it doesn't like. Not sure how/if it would be possible to get the visual editor to work with it. 21:43, April 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * I see.Kinglink15 (talk) 23:18, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

God letters
They're a nuisance aren't they :P 10:50, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Indeed and some dude is messing up the guthix page a bit Kinglink15 (talk) 13:46, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Elder gods & Freneskae Creator-God
Well yesterday Fswe1 told me that Mod (Dave) Osborne had an interview with RuneZone radio, and he answered some lore questions there... apparently also something about Marimbo(?). It seems it was posted on the [RS forum too that he would. The interview is being transcribed, and might be uploaded on their youtube channel too, but I'm not sure. I hope that helps ;) In any case: I'll be waiting :P 17:13, April 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * It is better if we wait invade any information is told wrongly ppl who rp In rs relies. This site for important information Kinglink15 (talk) 17:34, April 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I understand your concern... but there are other things that deserve more care.. like those pesky god letters :P That we can't yet check ourselves in annoying, but I'm willing to let it stay a while - as it's probably correct. 17:46, April 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I still believe we should wait, because people will just be looking for proof, even if we know it was asked, there is no Video, or thread of their interview, or him answering any question. I think it is better off leaving it away, until proof can be shown.Kinglink15 (talk) 20:31, April 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Say no more - patience is a virtue - you have convinced me ;) 10:45, April 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * The source for the Freneskae god being an Elder God is still pending, but there are more than three Elder Gods. It is stated in the Lore Q&A, which you claim to have read, here: http://www.webcitation.org/6FEjUgiP8 (CTRL + F and "elder" should get you there immediately). 15:21, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

I know there is more than one there are in fact 3 elemental but there is no proof freneskae is an elder god yet and shouldn't be out as one until there is proof and source to show he is so let's leave it to that. Until more proof is shown then we can state it and the Lin only shows the first page, the thread was removed. Kinglink15 (talk) 15:35, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

Please stop with the reverts
Hello, it seems you have been reverting all the statements claiming that the Freneskae Creator-God is an Elder God. According to Mod Osborne, a jagex mod responsible for the Runescape Lore, there is an elder god, apart from Jas, known by us, and he has no relations with Gielinor. The only possibilities are Tuska and the Freneskae Creator-God. Since Tuska is a mortal that achieved godhood, going by evidence with Guthix's memories, and is a goddess; it can't be her, so the only remaining possibility is the Freneskae God. As much as you don't like this fact, it doesn't give you the right to add your beliefs to the Runescape Wiki. If you continue with your disruptive editing, you may be blocked from editing. If you want to share your beliefs to the world, feel free to create Kinglink15's beliefs Wiki however. Thank you for your time and contributions. 18:23, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

Please don't accuse what u don't know. I only revert because there is yet no proof of this what so ever, until proof is provided people rely on this site a lot, and I wish to keep it as clean with proof as we can, so please do not accuse of I want my beliefs as that is not true I only wish for facts to be shown if no fact can be shown yet its best to wait for those facts or we call source. So please don't accuse something like that. Kinglink15 (talk) 18:32, April 25, 2013 (UTC)