RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Earthere

Earthere
Reasons described.

''I, Earthere, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, earth (t) 11:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC).

we're in the middle of a RfA storm, so I guess I can post my fourth request for adminship. let's see if this works.
 * 11th highest contributions (mainspace) [source http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Special:WikiaStats]
 * active at RuneScape Wiki for about 13 months. registered 16 months ago.  I hate math
 * I frequently assume good faith and I do not typically bite newcomers.  when a newcomer makes a positive contribution which may not be correct, you can see me reverting with a "good faith" label and a short explanation.  check my contributions. =p
 * I tend to create redirects that are useless to 90% of our editors. they're created to help n00bs to hit the article they want, regardless of how terrible or misconceived the search term is.   although an editor once said they were helpful to him once. :)
 * I've edited many templates and reduced the filesize of their images. I'm a bit anal about website design and how it should be minimalistic--like bandwidth is the whole world to me. =p  if admin'd you'll find me optimizing and rewording text the MediaWiki mainspace; generally boring stuff that I coincidentally have an interest in.
 * if in the event you believe you were unfairly unblocked blocked by me, leave a message in your talk page with Template:Unblock and it will be examined as soon as possible. blocks are serious business;  if I made a mistake or have some doubt over the legitimacy of the block, you will be unblocked. benefit of the doubt always.
 * similar stuff goes with speedy deletion. disagree with my deletion? message me on my talk and make a short request and I'll undelete, unless it's absolute garbage ( Your mother loves runescape, zezima sux ).  if I still believe the deletion was justified, but the article wasn't a snowball attempting to survive in hell, I'll restore it and nominate it for deletion.  in that case rsw's community should decide instead.

chances are, this request will fail. but let's see how it goes.

Discussion
I don't know what to say here, but I'll address your promises. 1) Posting an RFA during an RFA storm is a bad thing IMO. 2) Nice. Keep the edits a-comin'. 3) Good, but time doesn't matter sometimes. 4) Sometimes I think you assume good faith too much, even in the face of blatant vandalism. Admins need to be uptight. 5) I like that, the more redirects, the merrier. 6) Good job. 7) Did you mean "unfairly blocked"? If blocks are serious business, your block log might pose a little problem :X. I guess that's enough for me to weak support. Don't screw up >_>. 23:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Neutral - Earthere has been a good editor thus far, and will make a good admin. However, the self-nomination was not signed, and this makes me wonder whether you really accepted this nomination or... not. LOL. 11:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose - I'd be willing to support you had I not seen your actions after your last failed RfA, after witnessing your last temper tantrum though, I doubt that you could truly be trusted with these tools.-- 19:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Neutral - As Azliq7 21:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)