User talk:Zezzima

25k trick
It is encouraging other users to break rules by providing an unfair advantage on pvp worlds to manipulate the system. It has been deleted before under different names for the same section. 01:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Your Story
Your story touched me rofl. You know, you can go to the west entrance, they won't kill you. All ofit made me laugh in my head!

Re: ban some dumb noobs?
Hello, I've blocked 206.213.191.133 for a week, longer blocks will be issued if there is more vandalism after the current block expires. 03:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Grand exchange
I bet you just removed that so people would support your AOTM nomination.

Then how come you removed it now? You should of removed waay before if there was no updates. --Supirion1 23:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Forum admin
You do realise he'll remain an administrator as well as a forum admin? O.O

No, forum admins can block people from the forums and admins can't.

Yes, really. --Supirion1 23:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Just thought I should add that admins (i.e. sysops) can moderate the forums - block and warn users, and lock and delete posts. Forum admins can do all this and make stickies, global anouncements and polls, but of course can't do any of the other things a sysop can do, unless they are already an admin (like Dtm already is a sysop, 'crat and a forum admin). Thanks, 15:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * A bureaucrat is a user who has all the abilities of a sysop, and can assign user rights - i.e. make users rollbacks, sysops and bureaucrats, and can remove those rights (except bureaucrat, only wikia staff can remove that). Also bureaucrats are the only users who can close RfAs, RfBs and RfFs (though thats not really a technical thing, its only because they can act on it). We don't have many bureaucrats as we don't need them - 3 are active (Azaz, Dtm and Dr5ag2on1 (Vimescarrot is semi-active, more often in the CC ingame than on the wiki)) out of 8 total for the RS wiki (Wikipedia has 31 bureaucrats total). The wiki's founder was Merovingian, though he's not active anymore. Hope that helps 16:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Good faith ?
Regarding 94.196.221.8, should you not first assume good faith and use for a first cause of possible vandalism, instead of leaving an aggressive message on his talkpage ? For all we know, with a little bit of constructive critism he could make an account and become a great editor. 16:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It basically tells them nicely to follow the instructions at the top of the page, if they continue vandalising you can either report them to the Counter vandalism team to deal with or add or  to their page, which tells them  the following ;

It was me, i just put it there to show an example of what does, you didnt acctually vandalise :P  16:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stop Changing
I know that sabotages is the plural form, but the problem is that sabotage doesn't refer to a person committing it, while saboteur does. I discussed it on Soul Wars' discussion page already, and I thought it was cleared up, as it was concluded that saboteurs was the correct term. So if you don't mind, can I change it back? :P

08:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Please don't corrupt pages
Sorry about that. I use a spell check thing that underlines words that it does not recognise. I just search for an American spelt word and change it on all the pages. Still, on the flip side, I have spell checked hundreds of pages and changed possibly over a thousand words and I have only ever made 1 mistake. That is a good success percentage