User talk:Soldier 1033

Leave a message &darr;

Spam
Mmkkk I get it now! 05:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Curse you and your talk page stalking ways! 05:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, what about talk page stalking? 05:02, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh nothing..*trips Ajr and Powers on their way out the door* ^^ 05:05, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * This spam was so insincere it made me cry. You are not a spammer sir. You are a grumpy guy. When you spam out of spite instead of out of sheer delight in the mayhem, you make flowers wilt and fruit go bad. :c 05:14, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am now a sad panda. Do not forget the nice things I did for you, sir!  05:17, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha! You fool! I reread that nomination hoping to find a spelling mistake to nag you with, but you said I undo edits instead of rolling back to assume good faith when in fact... the only reason I undid... was because I hadn't bothered to request rollback yet! if I had it, I'd have rolled back everything! Your trust was misplaced, and your hopes and dreams shall go unfulfilled! 05:23, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're fired, son. Get out of my house! 05:24, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your signature is so small. I can hardly read it. *squints* you should make it, like, 3x bigger. 05:26, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe your eyes are just small. Muahahahaha! 05:29, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Funny how easy that is to get rid of without violating DDD  05:45, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I counter with RS:GTS! 05:51, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh touché, good sir! I was almost ready to accept defeat, but then I hired the guy that trained Rocky and he told me to keep on going no matter how hard I get hit. So, with that, I am counterattacking with RS:UCS! It's super effective! 05:53, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't feed me. The only winning move is not to play. 05:58, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have a better idea. Click here for free pr0nz!!! 06:00, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Eww! No one likes that kind of pr0nz! Er, sorry. I'm not here to judge anyone, not even a pervert like you. 06:07, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, were you around when Mr. Vandal bot came? 06:09, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was still congealing in the viscous genetic solvent that people like me are spawned in. 06:12, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I do that for the sake of consistency! 18:49, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant consistency within my signature! If I uses span formatting, I might as well use span formatting for everything after all! who cares if it 12 extra characters?! 19:32, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did I?
 * http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/9880/drevil.gif
 * 21:42, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're trying to strongarm me into voting! Did you ever consider that I could still be undecided?! *is hurt* :c 21:44, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Wikiclean
Epic -- 00:12, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd like to place an order for a wikiclean. 00:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Noes, it was done by tlul, not me. He was calling me a noob. *hides in closet* 00:33, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it a real extension? What does it do? 01:06, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs to be one. Most of these edits are filthy. Especially this one. 01:47, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Request for reopening
Hey Andrew, I'm requesting the reopening of Forum:Change DBAN to DBAD for the following reasons:
 * The thread was open for approximately a week.
 * Consensus was not overwhelming; while many of the early voters supported the change, many of the later ones did not. It seems to me, as a neutral observer (and one who supported the change), that most of the early supporters were not necessarily supporting changing to DBAD, but more affirming that DBAN was unacceptable.
 * The closer (yourself) was not neutral during the discussion, and you were the most fervent supporter of the change. While it is not a true "requirement" for the closing sysop to remain neutral during the course of the discussion, it may lead some to believe there is a conflict of interest.
 * The premature closure of the thread will inevitably lead to more threads on the matter (already, one has sprung up.)

Thank you for the consideration,

18:37, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you.  00:39, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

I thought I should mention that it wasn't a good idea to have you close the discussion. Closing it as a biased party, you're not protecting the integrity of community consensus. Some of the opposers will no doubt believe that you are abusing the tools you are given as a sysop. 19:58, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you feel that way, but that doesn't change the fact that it was going around in circles and need to be closed. Regardless of who closed it, it needed to be closed. 01:27, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * If it needed to be closed, get a neutral admin to do it. Would you like it if I closed Forum:No full protection for userpages as successful, while having supported it myself?
 * I'm not going to spend time worrying about what's already been done, Caleb. DBAD is an essay now. Time to focus on the present. 02:26, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you can't provide a decent explanation for your actions, then don't do it in the future. Do not forget that you are not higher than the community, and you don't make the choices for the community either. 02:40, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Caleb, I never said I was higher than the community and I never said I made choices for the community. I would very much appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth. Now, there is absolutely no actual guideline that says you have to be a neutral sysop to close a discussion. It is general practice, yes, but it is not required. I'm sorry if you are upset, but this is not something to debate. As I said, what's done is done, and in that particular case I did what I did to end the pointless arguing as quickly as possible. Please do not make this out to be something it isn't. It's offending to me. 02:52, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to walk away from this, as with many others, I'm getting nowhere talking to you. Your role as a sysop includes being fair at all times. If it takes me a large amount of effort just to have you say "Hmm, alright, I suppose having a neutral admin close the discussion would be fairer to all the parties involved.", then it's not worth my time. 03:02, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * You've clearly made this out to be something it isn't. I've already explained why I did what I did and you insist on accusing me of "being higher than the community", "making choices for the community", and bunch of other irrelevant nonsense. Next time you want to accuse me of something on my talk page, expect a rebuttal. I have had more than enough of this crap for one month. 03:23, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Thank you for closing that
Not a problem. The re-hashing of previously addressed issues in the YG drives me crazy; I couldn't stand to leave that one open. -- 01:32, July 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * My thread's topic wasnt about dick or noob, it was about removing the essay all together. I dont care if the other thing had 500 supporters to one, my thread was about a different issue. Is this not clear?


 * regarding assumptions, halo clearly said on the other thread that he intrepreted "dick" to mean "harsh trolling". At no point am i claiming that that other thread wasn't going to pass, nor am i claiming theres anything wrong with it passing. As i said this is a seporate issue. 01:41, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Reporting bad ads
Is there a way I can report ads for RWT?

Re:Lol
Oh, sure. But I gotta leave for a bit, how about you delete them? 19:28, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I realise that, but I figured that it was so long ago they will have moved on and forgot all about the wiki. Also can't we just reblock them without the ability to post on their talk pages? Shouldn't we do that instead? 19:44, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yea? Tell me where I used it, fool! 17:25, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I suspect you saw an edit that I made ages ago back when I was a silly little edit bunny. 17:57, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I have to hunt it down and prove you wrong! 19:59, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Defining administrators
That would be wonderful, there are two sections remaining; Role of counter vandalism & Perception and RS:AEAE. I'll also assume you've read the job description on the others' talkpages.-- 20:18, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent, all I need now is to find someone to take on Perception and RS:AEAE. Also, if you've read my edit to Caleb talkpage, you'll see that due to the order I'd like to start this in (basically the order I managed to think of the topics as I wrote them on the page), your section will be going first. I'd like to set a star date of next Friday if possible in order to utilise as much of the summer months as is left when many off our users tend to have free time and would be able to contribute more effectively. If this is either too little time or too much time for you to get the affairs in order please let me know so that I may adjust accordingly.-- 20:38, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

GOLDENTICKETAMG@@@@@@@@
No thanks. :) 20:27, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * nom nom nom salt 20:29, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * nooooooooeeeeeeeeeeees 20:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, 'cause lots of people would oppose. And while I could use the tools, I don't really /need/ them atm. 20:36, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno, but people would still bring up the bot incident from months ago. Even though people should now know that that was an isolated incident. Trust me, I've been through (and passed) ~8 RfAs and RfBs, I know when the time is right ;) 20:39, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rawr
But... that's so much more to type ! Fine, I'll use those from now on (if I can remember ) Thanks for telling me.

21:22, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Block me
Perm block me from this wikia... 21:49, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do it... I'm through attempting to discuss anything on this wiki again... 21:54, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

A Question
Are you confused?

Explanation for why you may be here. And if you are, you need to update your userbox ^_-


 * I just remembered that thread being by someone else, and then saw the name changed, and then saw that you didn't update your userbox template, and didn't know if it was actually you o_o 05:38, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Response to my userpage
If I'm doing anything wrong please tell me. I'll fix it right away.

Jeffwang16 15:51, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Improving Inter-fansite Communication
A changed proposal has been submitted, you may wish to reconsider you stance on this issue. Thanks 04:40, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Stop putting the admin list at the top
We seriously have no reason at all even to have the list on the page, and its a pain in the ass to scroll past an ever longer and longer list of names to get to the part we NEED. --Degenret01 03:29, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Role of counter vandalism
Perhaps it'd be a good idea to have a section on unblock requests (since after all, administrators are supposed to be able to account for their blocks and deal with the requests)? 07:54, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re:That soccer dude
Heh, it probably would have been. I have no idea why I chose to re-block him, I even took all the time to spell check my block summary so I wouldn't look stupid -- 04:35, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Concerned Bystander
Twigy is having errors with wiki and can't edit, but he wanted me to post the following here: "Andrew! This is not like you. You are normally calm. What is with you?! From Twigy/Man tag." So there you go. 06:43, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Andrew, 3RR can only be invoked with more than three reverts on any one page within 24 hours, wszx. Only has three.-- 06:46, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, that was a mistake on my part. Their misuse of rollback was ridiculous, though. 06:47, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rollback is considered the same as reverting without a reason. He should have a given a reason, so I guess you have that.  Now, I'd like to add something.  I am on NO ONE'S side.  I am going to be as fair as I can to everyone.  I would suggest that you take a break, you don't have to listen to me, but it could do you some good right now.  You are playing Judge, Jury, and Executioner, as I said on Harle's talk.  That's why we need other opinions.  You are taking this way over the top, and it's only going to bite you in the ass in the end.  I want to help you, but you are going to have to slow down a bit.  I disagree with your thread, and I don't think it's going to accomplish what you want it to, but I still understand where you are coming from.  Just slow down man, I'm begging you to do that if nothing else.  I truly don't want anything bad to come out of this.   06:58, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE:AIDS
I reminded me of Rucka Rucka Ali: 295rk7z53dE 08:14, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uh... its sponsored by a foundation of some kind. 08:19, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe that sounds like the outcome of one of your threads. 08:29, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:AMG HALP@@@@@@@@@@@
I fixed the problem it was someone obviously vandalised Exchange:Pure essence, maybe all the exchange pages that the CTI is worked out from should be protected otherwise this could happen very easily again. 09:33, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * noes everything is asploding 14:06, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * AMG its 2012 we all gonna di!!@$  18:29, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: The year is 1929..
I think someone fixed it

I put some useful data at User:Quarenon/CTI which contains the prices of each CTI component and their last change, making it easy to revert vandalism that shows in the CTI. -- 21:50, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Lying, cheating, mass muters, suck ups = all mods
Just giving you the heads up. Degen closed it. For a poor reason imo. 00:14, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Regarding your comments on (wszx)'s talk page
Soldier, there was a reason why I left my message on (wszx)'s talkpage and not yours. Simply put, I find it difficult to communicate anything to you. I will elaborate on my comment further and explain my reasoning, but if you want to debate it out, I will not continue. Take this with a pinch of salt if you want to, but keep in mind that I only want the best for the Wiki as a whole, and am not calling you out because of any personal grudge, and am not looking to start any drama.

To start off, perhaps I phrased it incorrectly, but it was not my intention to say that you weren't taking responsibility for your actions. I was pointing out the fact that you are expected to be responsible for your actions, and saying "Nobody's perfect" is something I find, irrelevant.

I am allowed to comment on your actions if I see a need to, and I certainly saw the need to when I read (wszx)'s talkpage. Again, I reiterate, there was a reason I left the message on (wszx)'s talkpage, because it wasn't directed at you, it was my input for the discussion there.

I ask that you take this with a little offence as possible, but if you notice, you often accuse others of putting words in your mouth, when often, it isn't the case. Right now, I point out to you that I can easily say something along the lines of "I never said I was your parent and never said it was my job to lecture and reprimand you, and I certainly never said that I was in charge of you" if I wanted to. But would I? I wouldn't, because it isn't really true, and that sort of accusatory tone only adds fuel to the fire, and also because I believe it's digressing from the issue at hand. Also, assume the assumption of good faith.

Perhaps, like some others, I have been finding some of your actions to be rather irrational (not that I'm expecting you to agree with me on this point), and honestly speaking, I did find you more logical back in '08/'09. Just as an example, I found you overly authoritative when handling the situation with Composite, not with the block, but with the threat you gave him. Yes, it is our responsibility to moderate discussions, especially when they are becoming heated, and your actions were justified to a certain extent. But notice how this is phrased: "You will knock off the personal attacks or I will block you. Understood? Good." It may be an honest mistake on your part, but even I could see how that only served to antagonise the situation further. Tlul's warning was enough really, but if you wanted to add on to his comment, something along the lines of "As a warning, please refrain from making personal attacks, it only serves to make the discussion more heated." would have been more tasteful. The way you phrased it, sounded like an order, as if you were higher than him. The bit at the end ("Understood? Good.") didn't help either, it made it seem like you were belittling him further. Which is why, I can sympathise with Composite and see why he would reply with "LMFAO, please get over your power trip." (not that he should have, of course) You may choose to take note of the points I mentioned, or ignore it entirely, but please refrain from accusing me of parenting you, because we are both aware that that was never my intention.

I know that both of us are trying to work towards the good of the Wiki, which is why I hope to resolve this as amicably as possible. You can ask that I clarify any of the points above, but if this turns into a debate, I'm not going to continue. Thanks. 12:09, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

FluffyBunnyBot Error
I just wanted to let you know that FluffyBunnyBot blanked a page here. 20:47, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * And here as well. 20:49, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * hye ur vandlin teh wiki@@@@ ur liek wojwoj that way 01:21, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Whats wrong with?
Whats wrong with using and for strikethroughs? FluffyBunnyBot is replacing them with a long version, and  01:03, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * The former is deprecated HTML. In plain English, it means that we just don't use it anymore for no real reason :P 01:20, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see, thanks. What a waste of time (the ppl who are choosing to phase it out, not you). 04:35, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right "Tap tap tap?"
I have saved the Konami code to my Monaco.js, what does "Tap" mean?!

Jeffwang16  (Talk)   (Contribs.)  Email 04:29, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE: FBB page blanking
I've looked at the blanking issue and found the main problem. can run into problems when processing large amounts of text with certain regular expressions that aren't specific enough. In this case,  may return NULL and   (PHP >= 5.2.0) returns PREG_BACKTRACK_LIMIT_ERROR, which can be caused by having too many characters being consumed by wildcards in the regular expression. There are three things you should probably do:


 * 1. Optimize the regular expression by using more specific character ranges. For example, this:

$text = preg_replace('#([\s\S]*?)#i', '$2 ', $text); can be changed to this: $text = preg_replace('#"\']*?)["\']?>([\s\S]*?)]*?>#i', '$2 ', $text); Before,  would use   as a reason to check the entire string beyond the tag even though it will ultimately fail to match because there would be nothing left to match the end tag.
 * 2. Increase the backtrack limit at the start of your script, like this:

ini_set( 'pcre.backtrack_limit', 250000); The default is 100000. I would try to work on improving the regular expressions first before resorting to this, because there is probably a good performance-related reason as to why there is a backtrack limit in the first place.
 * 3. Check the return value each time you call  for NULL, and skip the page if the regular expression fails.

$text = preg_replace('#([\s\S]*?)#i', '$2 ', $text); if ($text === null) {	$bot->log('Regular expression error: ' . preg_last_error);	continue; }

You may want to put all of your regular expressions and replacements into an array so you only have to call  once and check the return value once. You should check the return value even if you fix the blanking through 1 and/or 2, so that you won't accidentally blank the page again if some other problem happens later. -- 21:19, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
 7lh525NYjzY Happy  Birthday,  make a wish!     12:37, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
Hello, I was just wondering if you would be OK with having a link to your email on RuneScape:Administrators. You don't need to provide your email address, as it will be linked to through Special:Emailuser. Please respond on my talk page. Thanks! 20:21, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

and
Seeing as you own User:FluffyBunnyBot and you hate deprecated HTML, I thought I'd ask you in specific this question.

Is and considered deprecated HTML? If so, what number should I put in for both small and big ?

Thanks in advance!

04:03, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, ok. Thanks! 15:30, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Evil1888
Are you saying that if I were a frequent anti vandal (and I had been here longer and had more edits etc) I might be able to become an admin? 21:19, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

'''
 * S                           S                                          S
 * W                           W                                          W
 * E                           E                                          E
 * E                           E                                          E
 * T                           T                                          T

'''
 * S                           S                                          S
 * W                           W                                          W
 * E                           E                                          E
 * E                           E                                          E
 * T                           T                                          T

'''
 * S                           S                                          S
 * W                           W                                          W
 * E                           E                                          E
 * E                           E                                          E
 * T                           T                                          T

'''
 * S                           S                                          S
 * W                           W                                          W
 * E                           E                                          E
 * E                           E                                          E
 * T                           T                                          T


 * I tend to be quite an anti-vandal myself...  06:48, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

"Arguing"???
What arguing are talking about? 04:12, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

RfA Comment Thing
Who was that aimed at :o 15:58, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, it is! I'll let Wikia know about this. 16:07, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * K, I'm told that Wikia is having datacenter issues, and that the sitenotices will be back up shortly. 16:10, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Halp@@
Ok -- 03:39, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

GO SOX!
Uh...Theres a smudge on your user picture. -- 17:18, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whats the winning percentage for the Cubs? Sorry, wasn't it below .500? I thought so...-- 22:47, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral
RuneScape:Requests for deletion/Runepoli - Since you're the only neutral admin that I can think of, that discussion requires closure. Cheers.-- 04:22, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

...Ohay
I can't believe it's been almost two years since I was seriously active on this wiki! I'd say I'm coming back but I kind of already did that like 10 times. About to get my membership back, so I actually might stick around this time, but who knows? For now, just dropping by to say hello. You still seem pretty friggin popular, with all those archives and such. User:Kudos 2 U 16:28, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't even really played RS since February, and for a while before that I wasn't playing much. The game just kind of bored me, but maybe if I give it another chance it'll be better. I have like 65 days of in-game time on it, I've invested too much to give up playing completely, lol. It's kind of intimidating to come back to the game though since there's just so much to do, so much that's been added, like the new skill. I miss my rollback crown in my signature. :( User:Kudos 2 U 14:14, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

a little clarity please
regarding Forum:Image hover text which was listed on RuneScape:To do list by Halo assumedly under the idea that when you said, "there is no consensus to use hover text", that meant to remove all hover text. Could you be so kind as to plainly and simply state if there was a consensus to remove hover text? Thanks so much for your attention to this matter. 01:00, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that was how i had understood the topic at hand. Simply stated you and i agree that there was consensus for neither addition nor removal. Personally I see it as a possible need for a wiki-wide article style clarity when it comes to articles that employ infoboxes, however that requires consensus for such change to be made, and honestly, i'm not very good at cat herding...  14:31, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * again our perceptions match. I offered multiple ways to help the editor that strongly believes removal is a good idea. Time will tell, but for now at least i can feel i can put that item to rest.  02:40, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Ban Composite4
Many users (including the accused) are asking for more examples of Composite4's inappropriate behaviour. Would you be kind enough to provide us with more. Thanks, 07:18, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

IRC
Hi, now that I know you used to go on the IRC; come back@@@ - Thanks. 14:26, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Protecting whole namespaces?
Hello, Chiafriend12 said you might be able to help out with preventing IP editors from leaving blog comments, he said you might know of a special page/MediaWiki page to do this, would you know of any such page? Thanks. --Callofduty4 (Talk) 01:02, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Impossible. There is no specific right which allows a user group to create blog comments, and as such there is no way to disable that ability for a group. 01:06, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks anyway. --Callofduty4 (Talk) 01:22, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Look noob.
RAWR

Lol forgot to sign, anyways I can't leave a mesage on RSCW so this is kinda my only way of reaching you. :3 23:12, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Cool, anyways, if you're on RS add me, we need to talk. 23:53, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/65.8.134.134

Vandalized the Dragon Scimitar article multiple times. --Callofduty4 (Talk) 23:50, August 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I didn't know such a system existed. I'll do that next time. Thanks. --Callofduty4 (Talk) 23:55, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Question
Mm, well, the decision was mainly based on the strength of the arguments. While numbers are (to a certain extent) a decent gauge, consensus is not about the majority vote. After all, we have often raised the example of "a hundred supporters with no arguments for a proposal, and a single opposer with a valid argument", where the consensus would not be in the favour of the supporters, since consensus is more about strength of arguments than numbers.

In any case, it was fairly obvious that there was a general agreement that Composite's behaviour was unacceptable and out of line, and many users agreed that a block was necessary, some supporters also argued that a 1-month block would be more appropriate, while others showed support for a block but gave no indication of how long the block should be. The opposition also managed to highlight how some of the examples of poor behaviour provided were lacking/irrelevant, making valid arguments in that aspect.

Taking note of all of this, I decided that a 1-month block would be the most appropriate decision. Hope this clarifies it sufficiently, feel free to ask if there's anything else. Cheers. 08:01, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

my space
lol did u like my space? User:Shaphancom

This may be too late
...but Stelercus found that your bot messed something up here. Whatever it did changed the bolding of the page quite a bit. 16:05, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

The RS clan wiki
Your main page was "D" for 7 hours before I undid it, perhaps you should semi-protect it (or full)? 10:05, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Lol?


03:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC) Marty

Serious Question
If I made an RFF or a third RFA, what would you think? 19:45, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

RS:DBAD
If I recall correctly, you were the one who implemented the Don't be a dick policy (originally implemented as Don't be a noob). I need to link it for Forum:DBAD: do we really need it?, but I cannot remember the exact name of the forum. A Google search was fruitless. If you do remember the name of the original forum, please add the link at the top of the new forum. Thanks, 02:15, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Arrr...
The pirate template that was posted here has been hidden by HTML comments. It was not deleted, but it was creating a lot of lag. You can still see the template's code by clicking on the "Edit this page" link. 23:26, September 18, 2010 (UTC)