User talk:Liquidhelium

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole. Please see my FAQ before posting a question.

Anyone who uses British spelling or date format on my talk page can expect to be swiftly ignored.

FIRST!
Eye stool teh first edit do0d. 01:55, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Bannhammer
I got my banhammer from this guy, its custom, not a brand name. 01:57, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Should of come to me I make banhammer's 19:53, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

You need to end your comment Somewhere
I was hoping that it would work unlike Zammy's D:! Apparently my Idea wasn't as good as I hoped... 02:08, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well... in my head I was going to correctly end it after I got a welcome notice... But... You ruined my planz D:! 02:12, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Practice what you Preach
If you've got crap to say, say it to Degens face.All users deserve to be treated with respect. 16:52, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, helm, that really is RS:GTS since wojwoj's sig obviously doesn't fit the criteria. Seriously, ajr's one is certainly not violation if that's not one. (On that note, I don't mind either of them.) 18:23, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Wut?
Why exactly are 'crats supposed to keep their nose out of community discussions? 18:23, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Some Userpage Stuff
Just a suggestion, but I think you should remove the following sentence from your page.
 * Things I hate ... Liberals, especially those that are currently screwing our country over.

While you're free to express your political opinions, I'm sure having that on your userpage will not buy you many friends. As a conservative, I find it repulsive when people of the opposite viewpoint predetermine a negative opinion of all those who disagree with them. It's completely possible for two individuals to remain friends while having opposing views, and politics is no exception. I expect respect for my views by those I don't agree with, so it's only fair I return the favor. I suggest you uphold the same standard. 22:23, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying you should change your opinions, just don't word them in such a way that it will offend those it was not directed at. Even then, I recommend removing it completely. 01:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would also change it to say "The liberals in congress," making it clear it's not directed at any wiki user. Don't you hate me right now? I'm off, so don't expect any further comments. 01:21, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because I said I would not be leaving this comment, but I am. 01:26, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Luckily for Stinko, he was given a rank by community consensus, meaning any policies regarding his eligibility are void. 00:55, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * If discussion is already a ways in (determined by your own common sense), I would leave it alone even if it breaks whatever that policy is. I would think, however, it was only meant to apply to perm. blocks (though don't quote me on that, I'm not sure). Also, what's all this about Psycho lately?  01:23, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * I, personally, would pick the quote "the other day a well know user called User:LordDarkPhantom got pissed off by him." 01:31, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

...
Because I didn't know it existed :P 23:26, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

User:Test
What's the point of User:Test if we already have User:Example? -- 23:31, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I placed it back as a redirect(like User:User and User:SampleUser) because it could be useful. If you do not agree, please tell me why. 14:29, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

irc
irc 00:54, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

AWB agreement
No, I'm afraid I don't agree. I plan on using my AWB for mayhem and vandalism which will be much more difficult to detect thanks to its bot flag. 01:43, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Who said ^ was sarcastic? 01:47, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that doesn't sound sarcastic to me. Anyway, I suppose I agree, but those conditions were not part of the proposal that was implemented, so technically there's no reason for me to agree.   04:23, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I shall rescind my agreement, because I, too, plan to vandalize the wiki.  04:33, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * We could vandalise together! We'd be twice as counter-productive! I could work on replacing words like "the" and "a" with curse words, and you could change xp and level values to random numbers! 04:35, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Or I could replace all of the inventory sprites with phallic imagery! That would make the wiki so much more popular, don't you think?  04:40, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't care about popularity or phallic images (although they are very nice....), I just want to see the wiki burn. 04:46, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Almost everyone has bot edits hidden, and anyways what I'm doing is obvious to anyone who checks a page diff. If I ever do anything more complex than changing an image, I'll give edit summaries. 00:58, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its what Parsons said in Forum:Psycho Robot Gone too far! 01:36, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * You closed the forum, and you didn't even read the proposal? -- 01:37, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm never wrong. 01:41, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:FFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-
Psycho was my first true love. Sorry. -- 00:59, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * p.s. jimbo was fscking in a taxi -- 01:00, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * :( -- 01:33, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I use a traditional font, a traditional logo, a sidebar, and a traditional browser too... -- 01:45, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Closure
It seems there's something in Closure that causes it to only show up if it is a forum thread (which was not of my doing). I'm not completely sure how to fix it, as I'd probably screw it up somehow. I'll get someone to fix it  22:12, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * The user that many users are not happy with has fixed it.  22:16, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

HAM mace
There's no page for anything like that... =\ --Coolnesse 23:08, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Psycho Robot Gone too far!
Recently Psycho behaviour has gone way to far, as the other day a well know user called User:LordDarkPhantom got pissed off by him, enough to post DGAF on his userpage, as many of you know lord isnt like this, i never seen him like this, he also left Project Myface and many of you know he great with images, all this in anger, i did some investigating in game and on wiki, the in game clues i have gathered is that lord was ok the day before the incident, but but the next day he left, the wiki clues lead it all to Psycho Robot-

hello, i recently change my siganture, then user called liquid helm change it bak, he has gone way to far, so i put , to try make my name show up, it didnt work, now i dont no wat to do plz help, thanks -- 23:33, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Um
What is all this about Psycho and clues and signatures? -- 23:42, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * IIIIIIIIIII linked to that through "wiki clues". Hilarious. -- 00:30, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Ridiculous!
-- 00:49, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are there so many vandals all of a sudden? -- 01:35, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Bed Bugs
Well, I'd rather sleep in an uncomfortable bed then one with bugs or pay thousands of dollars to have them removed. Anyways, good night. 02:35, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Mistake in the head.
Hey you when you visit a normal page, there are a bunch of stuff at the top, but, you have a mistake.

If you would like to be a moderator for the Defining bureaucrats project, please leave a message here, and if you would like to be a moderator for the Defining IP Addresses project, leave a messagehere.

Theres no space between leave a message here at the end, and you offered to be a moderator TWICE.

Well so there you have it, Im just saying,

21:19, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * There are two offers to be moderators because there are two projects. And I see a space at the end. -- 21:23, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

I WIN YOU LOSE SUCKA
I'd support it, though if you are intending to merge it to Hunting expert as I assume, you should do a RFM instead. 22:34, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well the whole point of what we were all doing was to bring more attention to requests for merges, etc. I think this would be a good "test run" if you will. 22:38, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thus the ultimatum is set! 22:44, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually the "fail" you noticed was intentional. It was a decision I came to because of two reasons. The first is that if two pages are of equal size/notability/etc, then there will not always be an obvious answer to "what should the title be?", thus I felt it would be best for terms of consistency to name the subpage based on the destination of the merge. Furthermore, if there are multiple articles to be merged, then what would the title be? RuneScape:Requests for merging/Team cape 1, team cape 2, team cape 3, ... team cape 50? I realise that's an extreme example, but it is with that spirit in mind that I thought it would be better that way. I realise that on one hand its confusing because you add a template to one page, then have a sub-page titled something else, but as soon as I get the template fixed (or rather as soon as Gaz does), you will be adding the template all pages, including the destination page, thereby making more sense as to why the rfm would be titled after the destination page. I realise its not perfect, but it was the best I could come up with given the many different possibilities for merges. What do you think? I'm not saying I'm right here, and would welcome some "you idiot this is how it should be!" comments 22:53, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm that would be a good idea. Then I could add in the documentation that it should be named after the destination page unless it is one small page merging into a bigger page, at which point you name it after the smaller page. Although again you do have a point that a rfd may have been acceptable too, since most of the information is already in the hunter expert article, thus meaning a redirect is just as good. Oh well, tomato tomahto. 23:17, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh you're SOOOO funny. But what you don't seem to realise is that PRIAR does apply since I POSTED THAT THERE YOU CRETIN!!! Love, 00:15, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep! Also AWB is such that I can still browse the wiki on Psycho Robot, so if you have any messages while I'm doing awb, still post it on my talk. Posting messages on awb is kinda of an inconvenience for me because even if they're spam, I have to log out of psyhco robot, log into hedonism bot, and then log back into psycho, since awb won't do anything if hedonism bot has unread messgages. 01:25, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Rfm
Are you going to move Template:Split to Template:Rfs like you did to Template:Move? -- 23:23, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

DBP
Sorry, I completely forgot about that. I think I'll be able to write it tonight and have it ready for you tomorrow. 00:20, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * YAY@@@@ 01:33, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...I'll write it. No one else was, so I didn't want to jump the gun, but it'll get done tonight. 03:26, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

RS:DDD
-- 01:59, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I twas kidding about the DDD -- 02:02, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I will not glorify his complete and utter disrespect for other users. I have examined the clues. -- 02:11, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm just too lazy to change mai sig. -- 02:13, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

this good?
Ty 4 answering... hows this? 16:57, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re:What was the point of the extra set of noincludes?
- quoted from 1 October. I didn't add them. That is most likely because of something i don't know, but there is a bar with the categories instead of wikitext for me, althoug i don't use that nubbish RTE. This thing apparently automatically adds Noincludes around categories. I don't know how to fix it... 17:56, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

ScapeRune
Well, if it was going to be denser, it would have to be made of different materials. There is no reason to think it is made of different materials, seeing as it looks exactly the same with water, sand, trees, air, etc. Yes, it could be made of something different in the center, and yes I guess, its possible its ScapeRune. However, aether way, its speculation without any real evidence or proof and thus it should be removed. 18:12, September 24, 2010 (UTC)