User talk:Joeytje50/Crap

'''This page lists a load of crap. Please don't read it. If your eyes fall out, i'm not responsible.'''

YOU KNOW WHAT?! I LEAVE! WELL DONE DEGENRET, ANDORINKATO(who blocked me agains the rules of RS:UBP), LIQUIDHELIUM, AJRADDATZ, Evil1888 and Haloolah123! Unblock template was here

^^This is because in other cases spam isnt vandalism either, and it does definetely not violate the other 2

--- Should i come back? Degenret is right in this case You are right in this case Just don't come back --- The above poll was in violation of Forum:"Everybody_hates_me"-- 10:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

­Should i come back? Yes

helpful contributors
Do not call their edits spam, and do not tell them no more than 5 edits per minute. That was some BS you left on his page and I better not see it again.-- 16:08, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record, no such policy exists to limit edits to 5 or under per minute.-- 00:44, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Degen's talk page
What you did there was ridiculous; I've reverted it. Talk with him about it, don't lag up the computers of anyone who wants to leave him a message. That is extremely inconsiderate. 21:12, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not cool. 21:14, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * And removing it is acceptable under RS:DDD, perhaps you should read it all. 21:16, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Dude, don't tell Degen not to be a dick when you ARE BEING A DICK. Grow up a bit please.   21:19, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter what he has done, there is no need to resort to such things. If you feel that discussions are being closed prematurely, make a Yew Grove thread about it. 21:22, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't leave, just talk about it. 21:30, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Then get someone else to talk to him. Heck, I will if need be. But don't go doing what you did. 21:33, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * You bloody crashed me. 09:52, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Talk page spam
I don't know what's going on between you and Degen, but I can't conceive of anything that would rationally motivate you to fill his talk page with spam and crash peoples' browsers. That's about as far from appropriate as it gets. If you have an issue with him or anyone else, resolve it in a civilized manner instead of resorting to stupid stuff like that. Hopefully you'll be able to do so when you get back from your little vacation.

Other users: If I'm missing a boat load of context, rather than explaining it all to me, just have someone undo the block. I don't particularly care to get involved in wiki drama, but hoo boy that was a stupid thing for Joey to do. -- 21:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

....
What's the point of saying you quit then making a poll asking people if they want you back, which only has one "supporter"? 10:15, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict)Whats the point in posting that when it says

If you want to ask something, message me ingame, because some nub blocked me, and now i can't answer talk pages ? 10:30, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * He can just answer it here. That's the point. 10:32, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Your notice on the top of the page.
Meh, just wanted to pop in and tell you that I agreed with them. You were being immature, were warned, and you decided to spam. That indeed does deserve banning. 10:22, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Don't be a noob
Don't be a noob degenret. 12:48, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * It IS allowed:

Where you see something about asking to come back or not? stop being a noob and Don't edit my page exept for messages. 13:03, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Guys, its my talk page, so dont edit it! i cant access my own userpage, so ill have to place things here! 13:10, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * First, RS:DEU has nothing to do with talk pages. Second, see User talk:Sentra246 - "I don't like butting in but... Degen is right the wording and everything dosent matter. The policy exist to prevent accidental anger and disputes. If there Is a chance that someone could get angry because of the poll results it shouldn't be made...(just IMO) - [Pharos]" -- 13:07, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't delete discussions. -- 13:11, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Desysop Degenret01
I think degenret01 should be desysoped, and i will start a thread as soon as my block expires. The following reasons are why i think that:

The following is completely quoted from Steler's talk archive. Liquidhelium did NOT participate in making this thread, and i just quote this to reduce writing work for myself.

"So, Ajr recently changed his signature to an admin crown with "jraddatz" text on the side. You know that. You also know that I modified it to have "Ajraddatz" text due to RS:SIG issues. Anyways, Degen said here that because Rwojy gets to use a bucket in his signature, Ajr was able to use the sysop crown's A for the A in his name, due to AEAE. I then told him that Rwojy's signature complied with the rules, since it had "rwojy" text in it. Degen complained that it wasn't readable, and accused me of turning a blind eye to a case of GTS because Rwojy was my friend. So, I basically told him that I don't make favors for friends.

Next thing you know, he archives that conversation as "troll fodder" (see edit summary). I found that highly offensive, and confronted him about it. I was especially miffed because he has previously accused me of violating UTP because I made a small link between him and someone who pushes for unnecessary change. So, it's now highly offensive to label someone as supporting unnecessary change but not highly offensive to call someone a troll? Degen completely ignored my comments as spam.

At that point, I seriously considered starting a "Desysop Degen" or "Ban Degen" thread, or at least filing a formal complaint to someone like Azaz about Degen. I decided against it because it would be highly unlikely to pass and because I had enough wiki drama. Anyways, that's how I lost quite a lot of respect for Degen. 02:59, September 18, 2010 (UTC)"

From now on only things i wrote myself.

He has done things like this multiple times. I'm giving a couple of examples that have to do with myself.
 * I wrote something on the forums of runescape he didn't like, and reacted very rude to it.
 * when i wrote something about a limit of 5 edits per minute on User:Dead evil84's talk. I heard that information from Cook me plox, who has likely got it from RS:AWB. I just didn't understand it the right way, but did mean it with good faith. Also he says "and I better not see it again." like he's the police or something, and he is better, which he isn't
 * he doesn't seem to see he is acting quite rude
 * after placing back the discussion because it was not over yet, he deleted it again within 6 hours
 * He ignores even the messages asking if im ignoring him, which is very rude

What i suggest is that we run another rfa, which would be like if he was not an admin yet, and then see if he would have reached adminship if he wasn't now. If he fails for this fake rfa, i think his adminship should be removed. 13:33, October 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Good idea but there's no point, there will only be a few opposes, just from people like you who are just full of hate right now. 21:27, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

A bit of historical drama
Talk page dramas can be interesting to look at from the sidelines. I was just browsing through your history when I found your old block appeal with a link saying that User talk:Thebrains222/Archive 3 was spam and it was allowed, hopefully you already know why it was allowed, it was because that was just a bit of fun between me and Sentra, see here. There is a difference between that and what you did, which I do not wish to discuss. 04:07, October 3, 2010 (UTC)