User talk:Aburnett

Promethium 2h != Promethium Longsword
The Promethium ("T10") 2 hander looks nothing like the T10 Longsword, just an fyi. --IPee 22:18, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Nonsense
Just a heads up, theres lot of silly named crap that still need articles from the release of Dungeoneering.--Degenret01 12:46, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with that. It so to click a link to page to see....nothing. But hey, it made me actually make a little bit for that page this time.--Degenret01 21:20, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU- 21:21, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU- -- 21:24, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Breaching
I care :( :( :( -- 21:26, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re (1):
Yeah, and I got a response, but they would like discussion and consensus before they would activate it, and I don't have the energy for that. 03:09, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you have an interest in this, you can propose it, I don't have the currently have the time to do so. 01:37, April 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * also, wat?

20:38 . . Aburnett (Talk | contribs | block) changed block settings for 189.115.227.144 (Talk) with an expiry time of 3 days (anonymous users only, account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) (Inserting/uploading offensive or inappropriate material: Stop that.) 20:38 . . Aburnett (Talk | contribs | block) changed block settings for 189.115.227.144 (Talk) with an expiry time of 3 days (anonymous users only, account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) (Inserting/uploading offensive or inappropriate material: Stop that.) 20:35 . . Rwojy (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "189.115.227.144 (Talk)" with an expiry time of 3 days (anonymous users only, account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) (Inserting nonsense/gibberish: lol spellfail) 01:40, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Honestly, all internet browsers fail, except for pure text-based browsers with no support for anything by design. 01:43, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

RfD: Pyrelord
I believe you misunderstood the situation. I was noting that an RfD had been partially made for the Pyrelord page. No reason was given in-article, nor was the "Discuss here" created citing a reason for the placement of the request. So I created it by clicking on it and expressing my puzzlement. Further digging into the history of the page showed that the RfD was made in late Feb. when the "dialog" section was given its own sub-page.

It was not a request to delete, but a "WTF" moment of head scratching. And since the template notes that the tag should not be removed before discussion, I initiated the discussion.

In the future, should I stumble across such anomalies again, if such an oddity should be noted, and if there is no reason given, and it has been quite some time since the template was added... Would it be acceptable to remove the template from the page, or should I do what I did and bring it to the "deletion team's" attention by "creating" the reason and going "Huh?"--Dionisio 23:08, April 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * TY for the clarification. Going gaming now. :-)--Dionisio 23:43, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Wut?
Wut? 23:48, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't like salted meat. 23:52, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * EDIT WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR 01:42, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * No fair, how come you have that many edits? 01:53, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, at least your page is a bit more interesting to copy than 3i+1's. 01:54, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nty, I have no idea what that Castle crashers (or was it crushers?) thingy is. 02:24, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * You have very "impressive" stats... 18:07, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, well, until you do, I'll marvel at your 25 level 1's. 18:10, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, the stats still suck.  18:25, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18:29, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 141.156.252.134 22:36, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

I'm taking four AP's this year, and yet I still have loads of free time. AP's are too easy nowadays <.< 21:39, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Bye! Good luck on your AP's! (Which ones are you taking anyways?) 21:45, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU- I hate it when I get beat to reverting vandalism by inactive sysops. 01:48, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Not bad. I took US History in 9th grade (that would be two years ago). I got a 5 easily. I find US history to be really interesting personally, though I am more of a science guy. I took US Government and politics and Chemistry last year (disliked Government, loved Chem). This year, it's Biology, Computer science, World History, and Calculus BC. Hate world history (it's soooo crappy compared to US history) <.< 01:50, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Huh, and they charge us steep fees also. =/ Oh well, it's only 350 something bucks for my exams.  01:53, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Each of the AP exams in Canada only cost $80.00 CND (about $2.13 USD right now :D). Wonder why that is... Ajraddatz Talk 02:12, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * =O You edited! Anyways, go here and tell me which version of Wojwoj's UOTM paragraph you like better. 01:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * The first one was my attempt at a serious UOTM paragraph. I hate it because it's filled with meaningless platitudes. The second one is the slightly humorous one that I wrote after Wojwoj yelled at me for making the first one so boring. I hate it because it seems unprofessional. However, the second one has Wojwoj's stamp of approval, and it's the one he wants me to use. >.< 01:27, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Wise Old Man
[ ...Lol.] That's sad. :\ -- 01:03, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:GEMW
I've been considering that, and other ways to help editors understand how to update correctly. I'll try to do that more often in the future, it's just that it's such a pain to log into the game, head to the Grand Exchange, look up the item... (the in-game GE is more price-specific; the GEDatabase on the runescape.com website abbreviates, such as 11.2k instead of 11,200). If only there were a better way to make editors understand how to update?

In fact, right before you messaged me, I added the image-guide to Gemw1. If you have any other ideas on how to make this clearer, please do tell me. 03:30, May 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, by that^ I meant if they had totally done the whole update wrong; not just the dates. In cases where only the dates were not updated, then yes, I promise to correct it for them in the future. 03:32, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

I've done some looking around, and I see that we have a number of templates at hand to help out in teaching editors how to update the GEMW correctly:


 * Gemw1, a message to be placed on an editor's talk page if they have incorrectly updated a GEMW page
 * ExchangeItemHelp, a not very detailed guide on how to update the GEMW correctly. It is currently preloaded into each [edit page GEMW edit page], for all editors to see. It does show a GIF explaining how to do update, but it does not explain how to do update, in words. This does mentions the AbsMinPrice and AbsMaxPrice parameters.
 * GEPriceUpdateGuide, a somewhat greatly detailed guide on how to update the GEMW correctly. It is currently used on subpages of the Grand Exchange Market Watch, such as Grand_Exchange_Market_Watch/Magic. It shows the GIF image, and also has a word guide to explain what is happening in the image. However, this does not mention the AbsMinPrice and AbsMaxPrice parameters.
 * And your template, which seems to be a combination of Gemw1 and GEPriceUpdateGuide.

I'm a bit worried about each of them; their contents and their usage don't seem to be as great as they could be.

We need editors to understand and see what they did wrong, and that's why I like your template. If we could merge together ExchangeItemHelp and GEPriceUpdateGuide into a new template in an easy-to-read way, then do the following, the final result would be a sort of expansion of your template to be more informal and user friendly:


 * Add it on to Gemw1
 * Replace/substitute it to where ExchangeItemHelp and GEPriceUpdateGuide used to be,

I realize I could do this myself, but I'm asking for your opinion about it first. I'm not sure if this could be a complex or easy project (or if it'll even be a "project"), but I feel I'll need help on this. How will each GEMW edit page preload this new template instead of the current ExchangeItemHelp template? Which bot could we use to change all of the old templates' transclusions to the new one? Etc. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could help me out on this little mini-project, as I don't really know what I'm doing in certain areas. 04:20, May 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I see you're busy with exams, so I've instead proposed my idea on the Yew Grove.  Good luck on your exams.  03:33, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

Instead of Template:ExchangeItemHelp or Template:GEPriceUpdateGuide, the GEMW instructions and information are now held at Template:GEMWHelp. I was here adding a nowiki tag, so that when ExchangeItemHelp is deleted, a red link won't appear. See Forum:Reforming GEMW instruction templates. 03:48, May 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, no, that's perfectly fine ! I hope you scored well??
 * I'm rather proud of the new templates, too. I've already started to see a change in the amount of incorrect edits  16:40, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

APUSH
Congratulations on finishing your AP US History exam! I hope the DBQ wasn't on a very difficult topic. The one I took two years ago in ninth grade was on the Vietnam War. (And don't tell me what it is now, it hasn't been forty-eight hours yet) 22:13, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * (Noneofmybusiness) Yes, congrats. What did you do your DBQ about? There isn't much American history to choose from :P Ajraddatz Talk 23:02, May 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, don't say it now. Wait till Sunday to tell us (exam security) . I have to say, APUSH was probably my favorite AP (edging out AP Chemistry slightly), even though I'm a huge fan of science. 23:17, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

It's been 48 hours since the exam ended. Tellmetellmetellme what the essays and the DBQ were on. I'm really curious. 17:06, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * ^ ANSWER MAI QUESHUN PLAWKS 22:05, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry, must have missed it in the slew of messages/spam I received. I KNEW there was going to be a pre-colonial one sooner or later. I was really worried two years ago since I didn't want to have to do a pre-colonial DBQ. As usual, essays are easy. (though I think I did one on the "New South". O.O I had no idea what it was, but still got a 5 on the exam lol) 22:09, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * What textbook did you use for your APUSH class? If I remember the edition correctly, I used Enduring Vision, 5ed. 00:44, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, it was the third edition. We used to use the practice tests here to practice, since our teacher used many questions straight from that. Until one day, she disagreed with one of their answers. >.< 00:47, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, I remember using those quizzes to practice on. My teacher stopped using the online questions aftter basically the entire class put the same answer on that question she disagreed with. 00:54, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good luck on your Lang exam tomorrow! By the way, I looked at the APUSH essays on the CollegeBoard website (I'm surprised they posted them this quickly), and I have to say, I AM SUUUUURE GLAD I'M NOT TAKING APUSH THIS YEAR. But your two smaller essays seemed to be easier than the ones I had. =/  01:45, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:wut?
ikr -- 23:06, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

your message
ye i know him from an online game called warrock

i warned him that he wud be banned and w8ted for his reply

i then read his post underneath saying he was a sexgod i edited that to make him look stupid then was about to delete all the spam he had done but you beat me there

sorry i should of deleted this straight away but was annoyed caus he edited the post i had just spent my time doing by putting owningpoo is a sexgod at the end of it

i am sorry it wont happen again

also ar we not allowed to put "added by scotty xD" at the end to show who contributed to the post?