User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

My previous talk is now archived. For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five

fsdadfa
first 17:30, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry
Admittedly, I've done a bit of talk page stalking recently, and I figure I'll say that I completely understand your opinion of me, my actions, and my opinions of legal matters.

I'm unsure if it was the most honest or righteous path to take, but I would describe many of my actions and comments in previous RSMV-related threads as stalling for time. Faced with an onslaught of logical reasons to use cache images, I was hard-pressed to find reasons not to, and, honestly, I was going off of a gut feeling that accessing those images was wrong; I wasn't exactly sure if I was right, but I was trying to prove myself right. As such, I made several statements which I admit were false. At times, I felt as though I was proven wrong - only to find another article or case that made me feel as though I was right, and there were comments being made the entire time. In justification, I was and still am vastly outnumbered in my beliefs, so I argued fire-with-fire against logical or ethical opinions which, in my opinion, held no merit. Examples of such opinions include "Jagex won't ever know." As I've said on more than one occasion, it's a complex issue which I don't claim to fully understand.

Similarly, other "legal savvy" users had their ideas and opinions proven wrong, to their admission. I've described the entire situation as a learning experience, that none of us really know what's right, and that none of our points, ideas, or opinions really mattered at first. However, when I made a point, others were immediately scrutinizing it, trying to prove it wrong because (I think) they were going off of gut feelings that they were right. When they proved something wrong, I immediately dropped the point; when I proved something of theirs wrong, they dropped the it. In the end, I've got a legal argument which hasn't been disproven, and they, meaning everybody, have no arguments which, in my opinion, haven't been disproven.

The purpose of this book on your page isn't to incite a discussion, or to taunt you, or anything like that. I don't even expect a response. I just felt like I should explain my actions, and I hope you take this admission at face value and, if not forgive my actions, at least accept that I understand your opinion of them. Leftiness 03:10, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record I will respond as follows.


 * I can't begin to fathom why you think you owe me an apology. You never attacked me, so no harm no foul.
 * I do not hold a negative opinion of you, I simply disagree with a statement you have made. No big deal, people always disagree on things.-- 04:29, September 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Eh... Here I am talk page stalking again. I figured I'd make some sort of an apology because I acted in a way which I consider unprofessional, unethical, and thereby hypocritical, and I gathered from my talk page stalking that you were bothered by it. You being bothered made me think about it, and I was bothered by it, too, so, if nothing else, apologizing about it made me feel better. Leftiness 02:05, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

your sig...
....burnt a hole through my eye 14:02, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Can we desysop you for violating AEAE and having a crown in your siggy? okay? Yea? sure? 14:15, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Blast it, Degen, why did you get rid of your default sig? >:( ---> Dave Lopo 15:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

=S
Special:Contributions/Jimbo Given that it seems silly to leave him a message 19:47, September 15, 2010 (UTC)