User talk:Psycho Robot

Begone!

Leaving??
Are you leaving?? It will be sad to see you go  03:16, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * D: 12:40, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv293/Man_tag1/000103.jpg 08:16, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to hear that you're leaving, Psycho Robot, but I understand that it is your choice to leave if you choose to. You will be missed, though, by myself and every other editor on the Wiki. I just want to thank you once more for helping me with my signature and a few other things that I had a problem with on the Wiki. Good bye, and good luck. 08:25, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/6291/nooooooo.png 08:35, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

What he^ said. 01:25, January 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wat dah kity sayd.  -- 18:06, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * NAOWUGH! User:Iiii I I I/Misses Psycho :\ -- 18:19, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Noooooo u can;t go and plus what ^ they said 17:41, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/1564/missyou.png "Remember me and smile, for it's better to forget than remember me and cry."

- Anon.

05:43, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

thanks for the welcome (mrfartsalot4).

More appropriate articles
Hmm I was your commentary deleted all trivia not directly related to the quest, and moved them into more appropriate articles) on Monkey Madness (21:08, September 9, 2009) and I was looking where was there more appropriate articles where you moved the trivia. After watching nearly one by one articles where you might have moved it

Psycho Robot 09/09/09 edits

I didn't see any. Could you please tell me what are the links of the "More Appropriate Articles" so that I could take a glance at it. I'm just curious. By the way, I reccomend you reading the Rāmāyaṇa as it is a direct correlation with the Monkey Madness quest. (It may be a coincidence but if so, it is a perfect coincidence.) Thanks 89mch 05:22, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Psycho!!
Heyy!!! 06:09, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Your a Jew?
sweet I'm a Jew too :)

05:35, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not a Jew but Israel is epic win. :o

JEWS FTW (I'm a jew :]) 03:18, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

*misses teh robot*
05:36, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I miss him more! It saddens me when I think that he may become one of those admins on the list of inactive who never come off...  05:44, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * COME BACK NOW!!@!!@@@! 09:39, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Barely active
I was hoping that Barely active meant that you would still log in occasionally =P 10:49, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * U lied to us! your not barely active!  21:49, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

*Notices*
O.O 07:04, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Who was that mystery man?? 07:05, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * A Psycho man? 07:08, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * No... It was a rocket man
 * http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/8593/eltonjohn1.jpg
 * 07:14, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Best Rocket man vid .--Degenret01 03:37, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

What
[ OMG ARE YOU BACK?!@#?] -- 16:45, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * plzplzplz -- 22:07, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Belated thanks
I've never properly thanked you for fixing up my userpage back when I was a noob. :O (Although, I'm sure 3i+1 will tell you that I still am a narb). Anyways, thanks! 20:48, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

:o
This be bettar 03:19, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/trap.jpg 03:26, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Detail images
tl;dr.

Nah, just kidding! Why should I not put AA on images? The reasons you stated really don't satisfy. --Coolnesse 03:45, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright. --Coolnesse 03:54, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back
Welcome back? 04:14, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 04:19, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/tumblr_kzoytvZxBY1qzpwi0o1_500.png 04:20, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Signature Orphanage
There seems to be general approval for what you proposed in the discussion above. Seeing as you've had a burst of activity lately, perhaps you would like to close it and implement the changes? 13:46, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Silence while weak, is considered a form of consensus though. 01:47, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Could it... could it be?
CISCO!! 17:50, April 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * 8D Finally, someone to fix my router. Get to work, slave.

Are you back for good?
If you are, then you may want to update your userpage... 00:45, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * =O Meanie. 00:59, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You spelled his name wrong. It's Liquid helm, not Liquidhelium. -- 02:18, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Vandal
''Fine, don't heed my warnings! But I can't predict what terrors will befall you if you don't. Oh wait, yes I can. You has block for 1 week'' PWNED. 00:49, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Image

 * Sure no problem :D


 * I tried adding trans to it but it was hard lol


 * Now I know why :P
 * Thanks anyways :D

RE: I has a sad
No be sad. I think its down to the extra cells - the dose column is spanning two columns, one for an image and one for a number, while the corresponding cell in the ingredients table (herb) is only one cell, so cellspacing/cellpadding comes into play. Since it would probably disrupt the rest of the cells if I messed around with those, just subtracting a few pixels from each value seemed to do the trick. Similarly with last updated, Profit and Coins/XP. Good to see you back  11:41, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I had a look around and its not defined anywhere >.> I have a feeling its for users to define their own styles but no one's done that either ([ see]). Since the class isn't causing it I guess its the  (possibly the border bit too). I messed around with margin too, and it seems to have worked as (I think) you wanted, check it out. We could make a potion table class for it later, too.  22:25, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * fffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu 23:17, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn browser/computer differences D= 23:29, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's better  13:35, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

I'd provide support for all standard 3-ingredient potions (vial o' water/coconut milk+herb+secondary), with catches for untradeable ingredients or even potions. I think this would work for extremes too if you allow the vial to be "no", alternatively use another template for those. For the more exotic potions we can create a custom table on a subpage and transclude it on (e.g. Guthix balance/table) giving it a similar look but with all the required items.

I think using generic inputs would be better since the code of the template would be much smaller.

The extreme potion vertical works but could infoboxes are given a % width and the table is a fixes px width, so they don't line up in my broswer D: If they were merged into an infobox it would probably work, quite well.

Also [ lol]. 21:13, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * lol win gj  19:32, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Hey Psycho, welcome back! Also, "Ajrabbitz"? >.> Ajraddatz Talk 21:12, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
How might yee be doin at thees moment aye? Glad to see yee be makin yee edits again, yee. Yee have a nice day. 01:06, April 4, 2010 (UTC) yee
 * YEE -- 01:09, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah! Well how about this:

YEE

You've Just been PWNED! 05:00, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Green name...errr, not green
Im going to have to put this on my user page since I get asked about it almost weekly lol. :This is what I said to Caleb when he asked about it last month.


 * "The question is, why is anyones name hilited? No, I am not suggesting that anyone else remove their names from hilites, I just don't see a need for it for me. Heres the arguments I considered

So I can't come up with a reason to have my name hilited. If anyone provides a real serious reason, and shows that my name being blue hurts the wiki at all, I will gladly change it back to green."--Degenret01 05:02, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Vandalism - all the admins constantly patrol for vandals and respond in a heartbeat to the CVU, so thats kinda moot IMO.
 * Admin requests - we have a page that any admin seeing a post on it will respond and do what ever we can already, so thats taken care of.
 * Deletions - We have speedy D tag, and if we see it we nail it.
 * Image moves - A: thats rare, B:people needing it know who the admins are and C:we are about to have a tag for them per a YG thread.

Sir Rev and 7I also went back to blue. It doesn't hamper our ability to do what we do, so why not?--Degenret01 05:02, April 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * No, I actually liked the color green better. But it was suggested that possibly maybe having hilited names violates AEAE since normal users are not allowed to have it. I'm not positive I agree with that 100%, but I do recognize it is possible. And perhaps some users will think that being a sysop is "cool" because you get to have a stand out name color. SO I just think having the same blue as everyone else helps to show that sysops are not special or different, we just have a couple extra tools in our belt. I don't think I said this as clearly and effectively as it sounded when I was thinking it, but your smart enough to get the gist.--Degenret01 05:22, April 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Re:" if we had the ability to pick our own colours, a bunch of people would pick white or really light colours just to be stupid" Yea, I sometimes think its time to adjust our sig policy saying "Don't be stupid"--Degenret01 05:59, April 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Endasil is saying all or none. Now how long did it take you to find what section I put this in? :P --Degenret01 00:23, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Having lots of trouble today with the editing software, but anyway - thanks for the help on my Runecrafting article article. Wasn't sure about what you meant about the re-save -- but I made the changes you suggested, and I'm interested in feedback. Thank you!

PuzzwillowPuzzwillow

Thank you


Re:You're a fool
The message you put on my Clippy months ago is still there. :O -- 20:21, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * :D -- 20:26, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I read about that in the New York Times. Seems like the cat would be traumatized after that. O_o -- 21:01, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 21:13, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * [ I am disinclined to acquiesce to your request.] -- 01:06, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fibonacci number? -- 02:15, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Images
I'll definitely try out Low lighting detail. Don't think I'll want to go back and re-take all my previous pictures, though. Riblet15 22:07, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not a good prize. D:
 * This is working goodbeans. Hopefully people will feel less inclined to revert mine to a smaller image due to not being able to see anything. Might be a helpful piece of info to put somewhere for others to read. Riblet15 22:55, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Undelete
Ello, could you undelete this for a minute or two? The user who created it is apparently having issues creating pages, so I'm trying to find out what the problem is. Thanks- 01:53, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind, he seems to have recreated it. If you could just hold off on deleting it again for a minute or two so I can lend a hand that would be fantastic. Thanks- 01:56, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

u phail
http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=User:Dan_4096&curid=48010&diff=2501891&oldid=2495537 02:42, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * lies, ur just 6 feet under. 02:45, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Overuse of Special:Block
Hello, please keep your blocking to vandals only, and not other users. It clogs up the block log, and also causes some extra work for the counter-vandalism people. No offense intended of course, just a friendly heads up :) Ajraddatz Talk 03:09, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Blocking as a joke
Well, by now you realize I would hope that it never is. These tools entrusted to us are to be used for the betterment of the wiki, and it is rather sad to see how it was used earlier. I would like to ask you to man up, accept responsibility for your actions, and turn in your tools for 30 days. This will show wikia that we are not a bunch of children and can be trusted to do the right thing.--Degenret01 06:51, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don;t think it is meaningless or I wouldn't have suggested it.--Degenret01 06:57, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * It's a test, I wasn't sure the ! would work. 08:03, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Blocking
Let me clarify, I'm not supporting the 30 day tool removal, I feel it would not really send a message the way Degen intends it and would be largely superfluous. That last part is about another admin(s) not the ones involved in this incident (basically, I really wasn't being passive-aggressive it wasn't about you). -- 21:07, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Exchange:Mystic robe bottom (dark)
[ Lol] [ fail] -- 21:32, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * =O -- 21:35, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * =O -- 21:35, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm jacking 3i+1's section since I'm too lazy to make my own. Can't you change your userpage to something else? <_< 21:42, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's worse. And now, 3i+1 is going to whoop your sorry butt D: He hates people that say Liquidhelm as one word. 21:50, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Letter from Uberfuzzy
In light of some recent events here I thought it would be of benefit to share out this letter that Uberfuzzy wrote to Azaz129 with all our active sysops, and he has agreed to let me do so. This is not meant as a slap at any one for recent actions, just as some food for thought about us and where we want to be as a wiki. As you and your wiki has shown in the past, a large stable community can exist and be fairly self sufficient at Wikia, with little need from staff/helper intervention. This is a dream of ours, to have more wikis run themselves, allowing us to focus our finite amount of time and resources on the sites that actually need it. Sadly, your wiki is an exception in many ways, not the norm.

As with the checkuser, we've shown that we're willing to try things out, to break away from the mentality of "how things were done in the past" to see how they fair in the ever evolving world of wikis, and to get some real world data on how a stable wiki will react if allowed more rights. You've been great test of our theoretical worries about granting checkuser where needed.

Done. You bureaucrats can now add and remove bot rights.

One thing We've always admired about your wiki is even though you have a way above average number of sysops, you have managed to keep the bureaucrat list small, showing that you understand what that roll is meant for, and not just another checkbox. We hope to continue to see good things come out of runescape, and can continue to use it as a shining example of our dream.-Uberfuzzy --Degenret01 08:56, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

not vandalism? :S
How is adding random numbers to an Exchange page NOT VANDALISM? 13:08, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Webcite
Is webcite working for you?? I have tried to archive the threads referenced on Summoning history 4 times now over the last 2 weeks, but webcite refuses to load. 04:48, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you mind if you archive those 4 threads on Summoning history for me as webcite still wont load at all for me?? Also, I think that the separated version is much easier to read then in the infobox. 05:57, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah. I might try to find another thread or two on the subject to prove that there was a large outcry. Thanks! 06:30, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did a quick check and I could only find one large thread about it. Do you mind if you ref it for me?? Thanks 06:35, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have the effect on people. Everyone wants to immitate me and everything that I do to be cool. That message thing that you got was the same message that I got the one time that I managed to get the cite to load the archive page and tried to cite something. 06:49, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * We could start out own exclusive club! With T Shirts! 06:56, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well done! Have a "I pwned webcite" trophy for your trophy cabinet. 07:08, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages
I was going through Category:Disambiguation, removing two-item disambigs and cleaning up the other ones. I started to make the longer disambiguation pages look like Wizard (disambiguation) with two columns, but wasn't sure if they should stay in one column like Black. How do you think they should look like? -- 19:56, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I like User:Psycho Robot/Sandbox/Potion table separate better because the other one seems lop-sided if there isn't enough text on the left. So should we follow Wikipedia's style? -- 20:26, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you add me on your friends list? -- 22:06, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Crazy robot
Hey! Mr. Crazy Robot! Serve me a glass of coke please, and I'd like a side of cookies with that! 22:04, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good robot, bad robot. See the difference? 22:18, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

catagorys
how do you remove a page from a catagory? 02:10, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

i cant seem to find it on this page. trying to remove it from catagory quest items, as it isnt one.

Purpose: to be used in signatures and other templates to circumvent SUBST.

Usage: in Special:Preferences in the Signature field (as raw), for example:

Which becomes:

Template:Signatures/Yourusername

02:32, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Image
I am sorry but I am not allowed to use those websites. I have found some other image hosting places, but you do not support them. - 05:53, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Because my parrents won't let me. Anyway, if you are trying to avoid hotlinking, you would need to remove all hosts as all the images are going to be using up the bandwidth on those sites. So, it really doesn't make sense to banish most image hosts for hotlinking, if they are going to be doing that already with the other hosts. - 05:59, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

My parents are really strict about the internet. However, I get away with that with my special web proxy. However, that information really isn't needed. Anyway, thanks for helping out, try asking for me why only those sites are supported because I don't get that. Thanks for fixing the image, but I can't see it because it is blocked on the network. So, thanks but no thanks, Ill keep my userpage lifeless. - 06:13, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

OMG OMG OMG!!!
ty you are a hero lol that was so dumb of me not to realize the code! ty though !!!!!!!!!!!!! and a belated welcome back!!!!!! Fruit.Smoothie 06:16, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Checkuser
In a moment, reading all the new discussions, will run it now and get back to you. 07:18, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Checkuser returned no IPs because the last contributions were not recent enough. Perhaps we should get Sirnot1 to make an edit on his talkpage? 07:25, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I may be misunderstanding something here, but if we had his current IP, we could just check whether or not it has been blocked, and thus verify whether he was the vandal. Right? 07:50, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Just an FYI
Imageshack and Photobucket are common suggestions, but any other host is allowed.--Degenret01 18:06, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. Some of them fail to work right though.--Degenret01 18:18, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Lets Wrap This Up
Yesturday I left Sirnot1's home, and so it seems on the commments on his talk page, he has accepted a checkuser to be run. Im now on a public computer so I will not be able to speak for long, and it seems that Sirnot1's IP adress is blocked, so he won't be able to speak, of course. Should we run checkuser again? StopMe 19:08, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

ur talk page
i lold -- 23:28, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mine said [Dismiss this message] at the bottom. :O -- 23:35, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * o rly nao -- 21:42, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * [ i lold again] -- 00:28, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Did u create this website cause you have alot of edits and you welcomed me and u created my signature

How can i create a page of an item?

18:24, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Most recent sysop in rc
If you have a minute can you archive and close Forum:Overzelous%3F and Forum:Protect_site_enabled_by_Degenret01_on_8_April_2010, I'm a bit too close to the center on both so it wouldn't be prudent for me to do so. Thanks man, --Degenret01 03:27, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll have to pay your fee of "5,000 boondollars and 12,000 build girs" in RS equivalent, so 1 steel arrow is yours when next I log on. --Degenret01 03:43, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

but...
but i been doing it ever since i started, there nothing wrong with it =( -- 20:44, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * ok that sounds easyer =) -- 20:50, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

youtube
i got it off youtube -- 20:56, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re:This again
Yeah, at this point I am reluctant to assume good faith on Parson's part since he has lied constantly. However, I may be mistaken here, but aren't RSMV images much larger? I have never used it before, so I would not know, but I was not aware that inventory images could be obtained from it. 08:40, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to interject, but inventory sprites can not be obtained from RSMV, as they are not models. I have never seen one in the program, and I've looked through all 4,000 new models that were uploaded with the Dungeoneering update. I did not find the inventory sprites for the capes. I did not find any trace of the images for any skillcapes in the Game Guide (except for the Quest Cape, found here) and so...


 * I have no idea where he could have gotten those images . 21:40, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

I can tell you where he got those images. (Or, at least I can tell you a legal source for those images). In the skill menu, click the Dungeoneering skill. The skill guide should pop up. Now, if you click on "Milestones", the inventory sprite of the skillcape should be there. I think both the level 99 and level 120 capes are there. Where he got the cape, though, is a mystery. 01:01, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I'd appreciate it if my username wasn't the only thing on your userpage. <_< *Hand itches towards the delete button* 01:06, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Heh, the Wiki servers still keep the deleted versions of images so that we can restore them if necessary. Maybe someone should mention RS:HONESTY to Parsonsda.. 07:24, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Worth a shot. Those who continually used AGF to defend Parsonsda are really pushing it too an extreme, and quite unreasonable. Constant lying as mentioned in the policy is not consistent with good faith, they really should see that. 06:40, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

ok!
this is where i go it! http://www.rune-server.org/runescape-development/rs2-client/models/224310-dungeoneering-capes.html i found it when looking for the cape emote, i also found this http://www.runelocus.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77905 so sorry for uploads it =( -- Thok, Master of Dungeoneering  Talk  08:26, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Scream
What does [ this] mean? :O -- 19:53, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * song and lyrics :D -- 20:01, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * If ya wanna piss 3i+1 off, go post on my talk page now, so he can't be the first one there. 23:42, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright then. By the way, I redecorated my userpage today. Do you like it? 23:45, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * You copied mine. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFu- -- 23:58, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I shifted the order of the "BLLAAAAAAAARRRGGGGHHH" and the "Imma firin' mah lazer". It was the other way around on yours, I believe. 23:59, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's nice and all, but I don't work with files. So, I have no idea what you just said. 00:05, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mine. Yours. Same thing. >:O >:O >:O -- 00:07, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * >=( Fine then I'll change it. 00:09, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yay! :D -- 00:12, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why are you having this discussion on my page?! 00:13, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because I got banhammered off his page D: 00:15, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

For future reference, I just remembered that Parsons has agreed that any fake images will warrant an immediate 24 hour ban (Point 5). 00:12, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just hope that this discussion ends favorably. We've given way too many chances in the past. Our "final warnings" have become more of empty threats than actual warnings. 00:43, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

....
wtf? only the hood came from it, the capes i got from the skill menu in game!!?!? now i have to re-upload the cape -.- -- 20:04, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

tysvm
Thx for the delete and info for the future 23:39, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Stuff on Sannse's talk page
Hey Psycho, I know a bit about stuff like this, and while I can't answer your question completely, I can put a little light on it. First of all, after an image is deleted, the image itself remains on Wikia's servers for a while, in case someone wants to restore the file. That is what happened in this case, it looks like; the image was still in the database. I find that it takes a couple of months before that database is cleared. Beyond that though, there isn't much that you can do. Vandals, if they were really intent on having those images, could just upload them onto photobucket or another Wikia project, and use it that way. For example, http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20091115225029/mylegonetwork/images/2/2c/MLNredbrick.PNG is a Red LEGO Brick from mylegonetwork.wikia.com. Anyways, I hope that this shed some light on the situation. Just remember one thing; if we were so concerned about vandalism, then we wouldn't be doing this in the first place ;) Ajraddatz Talk 19:40, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Image replacing
There we go! For some reason I couldn't think of that - thanks. Of course the people who use untemplated signatures have to use .gif item images in them. D: 02:38, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Dust Devil/Charm Log
I might have done the math wrong, but the IP added 612 kills, and added 683 crimson charm drops, along with others (Unless, i did it wrong, then, I'm sorry). -- 22:56, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Eesh, sorry! -- 22:59, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Signatures
i was just going off of the "Basic Signature Template" .......which i see you changed to fit what you told me. BTW, i'm new to html, i haven't a clue what most of the stuff means, i just know what works and what doesn't. So if you see something I screwed up on please tell me. <- I made this from (well... almost) scratch! 21:40, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: RuneScape accounts
zZz ZHI zZz 18:56, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Here
you'll need it. 06:03, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * clueless eh? You'll probably want full body protection. But on a serious side, just about every discussion about blocking/deranking/evil monkeys/etc turns into a flamewar, or at least quickly moves in that direction. No matter how good the points are, it's still gunna happen, and I'm sure you know it somewhere in your subconscious. On the topic of flamewars, this should provide excellent flame protection. 06:16, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah, I'm a cynic, leaning toward pessimism. Doesn't exactly make me the most cheerful person in the world, though. 06:24, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Titles generally don't work for me, because I have a 'unusual' mind, so my thought processes could lead to what seems to be pure optimism by others, while to my process it is pessimistic. 06:33, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Doesn't have an account, will most likely never have one (includes all social networking sites (except msn to use im)--> 06:38, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * This is the only site that I have ever joined and actively participated in. I mean, I have email of course, but I have never sent a single message, just to show how apart I am from things. 06:43, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I never post in forums, ever. I just lurk. And lurk. And lurk. And I have actually gotten a reputation before, as an epic lurker. Always logged in, never saying a word. 06:52, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * The kind on forums I like to lurk are where smart/funny people go. It leads to tremendous laughing at the funny. Which I need, very much so. 06:57, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * ps was pretty damn good, I just reread them all again yesterday. I got to say though, homestuck is dangerously close to the max complexity a mind can handle. And I don't even want to think about midnight crew. 07:08, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll stay up a little while longer then. As for midnight crew, it seems to be some sort of timeline or something with homestuck. As it says snowman is the black queen, or was, or was is, or will is be. 07:24, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Unless you got anything else, then goodnight, and keep those suits handy. 07:16, April 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Something even more interesting: with this edit, I will be 982 edits behind you! I am on my way to crushing the Overlord of Editcountitis! 06:50, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Noooo, this is honorable, for once I defeat him the disease will die! Also it seems you have been infected with policitus, a terrible disorder where one brings up random polices in a hope to deter a goal. (having 2 conversations at once is hard, especially with the same person@@@)
 * By RS:RWOJYISBEST I order you to kill several people. The hitlist will be in your pillow, cut it open to get it. 07:08, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I counter that with RS:IAR not ucs, RS:IAR~

??????
wtf! i done nothing! nothing?!?!?! -- 07:15, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

new skill
i was so existed about the new skill i wanted to help that all :( -- 07:23, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * also i done more good then anything, you banning me over a minor thing! look at all the work i done since the last ban, all that hard work, and your banning me over a minor image! -- 07:33, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

cache pics
There is no way that policy on its own could pass or did. It kind of snuck in when people had already discussed the many other points, that section alone did not receive any serious discussion or attention. Seeing as how divided this place has always been on the issue it should not have been added in like that.--Degenret01 08:12, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

what happened last time
the only reason i stay on wiki is because no one likes me in real life, last time the ban happened i started crying because im so emotional no one likes me, every where i got people run away just because i look stupid, the only time im happy is on wiki and the cc with all peps, that why i love wiki, banning me cause me to go crazy and break the ban, don't you see, i really can't handle it, it not easy, without wiki i have no one, and last time everyone was mean to me in cc because of it, so why did you bring it back, are you just trying to ruin my life again? if so...your are going to.... -- 08:13, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

but why
but i just wanna know why you added the past about me, i wanted to start afresh i don't wanna be ban for small things like that, isn't there anything i can do to stop is? -- 08:26, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

sorry =(
it hard to resist a new new skill, the most player wanna do it see the cape/emote/hood, i just got carried away =( -- 17:19, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

10k@#!$%6216y37321
Soon I will outnumber you@@ and take over the wiki with my army of rwojybotzzz@@@@@@@@@@@@ 02:54, April 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * RS:OVERLORD: "The user with the highest editcount on this wiki is the unquestioned lord and master." Also it's ure password hash, i b leet haxor. 04:01, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * pfff, You wish. Highest non-bot editcounts. 04:13, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know, but you still aren't #1. 05:00, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * wat? 05:16, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * when i look at you, I c A_rock.png. 05:20, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * wrong. you -->[[File:A_rock.png]] The mountain's there, it's just 18000 px. 05:25, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

mountain -->


 * * cough* *splutter* Okay, what now? 05:30, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Why do I get drawn into stuff when I have done basically nothing? 05:44, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I try very hard to not get pulled into things, but I times I just can't help myself, unfortunately. I need to stay out of things, so the general population will think I'm smart, when I only say things rarely. And then I will seize absolute power. 06:00, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, something everyone should know about cross linking: to get to a specific namespace, you have to type it after the site. so it would be Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Don't-give-a-fuckism. 1:06 am, Today (UTC−5)
 * That's what I'm saying, too. I don't get involved in most things, but sometimes you are thrust into the center ring, with thousands watching and waiting. It seems inevitable, and it probably is, that no matter how hard one tries, they will be sucked into something against their will. Also something I watch for on admins/people with power vs. 'regular' people, is for Godwin's law to be fulfilled. I bet it will happen eventually, and it will be epic. 06:22, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Ohaiu
I need your help fixing that pesky template here 04:17, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Blocked IPs
I was going through block IPs (I was really bored) and saw that a few were not 'anon. only" and was hoping you could change these block to include "anon. only"

These are the ones I found (copied from block list) from oldest to newest:
 * 22:17, 7 June 2007, Dtm142 (Talk | contribs) blocked 69.156.178.0/24 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Reblocking - This is Total Rune's proxy)
 * 00:53, 15 October 2007, Clv309 (Talk | contribs) blocked 70.44.249.46 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Blocked by Splarka, don't unblock.)
 * 02:00, 1 July 2008, Skill (Talk | contribs) blocked 208.53.157.17 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (open proxy, trolling)
 * 06:10, 30 June 2008, Skill (Talk | contribs) blocked 66.90.104.89 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (open proxy, trolling)
 * 05:50, 30 June 2008, Skill (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.222.1.165 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (open proxy, trolling)
 * 05:08, 6 July 2008, Skill (Talk | contribs) blocked 67.210.100.3 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (open proxy)
 * 19:34, 23 January 2009, Azaz129 (Talk | contribs) blocked 74.50.96.0/19 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked) (Server hosting range containing multiple open proxies, page move vandals, etc.)
 * 23:33, 10 May 2009, Azaz129 (Talk | contribs) blocked 69.54.28.10 (Talk) (infinite, account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Block/ban evasion)

(Sorry about the no links)

I don't know if these are special IPs, I just know that IPs change. I don't want to wake up one day, pour my cereal, boot up computer, and not be able to edit. Thank you. 12:01, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * FYI, I'm gonna send a copy of this to Rwojy.

Re:Torn bags
Interesting.Helping the reader is why I did it that way. Any one finding one would want to know all about it, the real info about it is actually about the familiar. To people who are actually playing the game, (crap I just lost the game) it seemed more useful t have it that way. But switch away man.--Degenret01 14:49, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * And exactly the uselessness of the article in the other format just occurred. Ten pages on bags saying "this is used for summoning".--Degenret01 15:27, May 2, 2010 (UTC)