User talk:ScionCrush

Removing images
Before you remove images from an article, please put the D tag on them, as administrators have to look through the article's history to find them. -- 22:13, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I dint know and I apologize...ScionCrush 22:15, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Orb Of Oculus
I guess you're right.

I'm just wondering, if Jagex knows people discovered this, why don't they just remove it, instead of keeping it there and letting more and more people find and see it.

What you say makes sense, and I agree with it.

Cache Viewer
Where do you get this Cache Viewer?

Orb Pictures
Well its an area to include. No reason to have it deleted. 00:30, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Aiblade, it was used for testing the entrance to The Dragon Force, its leftovers. ScionCrush 00:31, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Reasons to delete along with the underwater are:


 * Bubbles have about 4 Frames of animations, this means they are WAAAAAY to old and havent been updates in YEARS.
 * That area isnt even in HD, it haves SD models AND skins, another proof that its old and havent been updates.
 * It was there WAY to long ago, just people started noticing now.
 * The "tower" like thing near the ribcage is in the GWD, but frozen (Confirmed in Zamorak Fortress).
 * A DRAGON WING WTF?! It is A.) Glichted or B.) Forgotten
 * The Area is unfinished, No floor, no room ending, means it was scrapped long ago...
 * All used for beta testing.

but what makes you think they abandoned it? something changed, it hasnt been there for years. 01:12, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

An updates that takes 4 years? really doubt it... We would have still seen a floor added or the textures changed to HD. ScionCrush 01:13, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

wgs took several years, at least. in any case, no reason 2 remove it unless we know FOR SURE. 01:15, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

^ I need a quote from JaGEx, WGS wasnt leaked and used all HD textures, doubt it took more than a year, a whole game (take for example, Dragon Age: Origins) takes 4 years to make, need more evidence?

it took AT LEAST a full year. even if it doesnt belong in future updates, it needs an article. maby u cant reach it, maby u never will be able 2, but right now its as real as varrock or falador, and for all we know will come out at some point. 01:20, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

^ Again, I a quote from JaGEx, did they say it was coming? NO. Look how Bloody glitched it is, THERE IS A FREAKING DRAGON WING FLOATING AROUND, The Candy Cane spinning glitch was WAY more real, check the clone room of Bandos Throne Room for example.

but what makes you think they abandoned it? something changed, it hasnt been there for years. 01:12, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

But what makes you think they are still on it? nothing changed, it has been there for years, since the release of the God Wars Dungeon. ScionCrush 01:27, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

on it or not, that doesnt matter- if jagex didnt change varrock for 4 years, would we delete the varrock article? NO! this place is exactly the same as varrock, falador, draynor or azzandra's pyramid exept for the fact that it is unreachable. 01:29, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

^ What?............Ok, We are talking about soething logic, heres the thing, its the same Dragon Forge, BUT WITHOUT THE BLOODY HEADS, it happens if you go to the Arsganian Ice Dungeon. you can see the Underwater area from RFD BUT WITHOUT THE WATER! Get what I say???

and how does that change the fact that these are possible future updates, and at the very least unique locations that deserve their own articles? idk about the heads/orb place, but the gwd place is definantly its own area, and deserves its own article. 01:35, February 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Both of you, calm down. Whether or not it is old or new ha no bearing on the matter. The correct reason for removal is that it is speculation. Speculation does not belong on this wiki, and it is almost always deleted quickly. On a side note, I am going to delete tiana, before you bring that up. 01:35, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Stuff
Two things: Do not delete talkpage material, as per this policy. You may archive if you want. Second: the edit summary was very inappropraite. Just because I agree does not mean everyone does, I can be proven wrong if the community decides keep them. More importantly, that kind of summary is considered flame-baiting, because it has a high chance to start arguing and eventually flaming. Please read the user treatment policy. 02:03, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

....I aplogize...

thanks, all though heated discussions never hurt any1. as for a mature or constructive or whatever u said discussion, sounds good 2 me. but lets do it on the yew forum, not here or my page. 02:11, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

thisll sound stupid, but i have no idea how 2 upload images. doesnt sound like something that would b hard 2 learn, however, so if u want me 2 ill start figureing it out, which is something i should do anyways, but if u know how and have images, i expect it would b faster. 02:18, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Stop Deleting Update Ideas
Seriously dude, you can delete these update assumptions once Jagex releases whatever explains their appearance there, you can add a (unconfirmed) to them, but you do not need to keep deleting them. 02:55, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

I delete them after I have enough facts to delete them, since its the wiki ANYONE can edit, many random people come here adding their ideas about future updates they think will happen without asumption, adding useless, unneded information, after I disprove them, I delete them, seriously.
 * Actually, only administrators have the power to delete images. -- 03:12, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, I apologize if this caused any trouble, deleting speculation only ;).ScionCrush 03:23, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

It would have been really nice to still have those pictures. Even IF Jagex truly planned on not using those graphics, it is very possible that they took the idea to form it into something new from that design. The theories might be false, but those images were real and not an idea about a future update.

They are, check for Yew Grove: saradomin encampment watery area.ScionCrush 03:23, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

orb
the orb at the stronghold has no dragonheads, THEREFORE IT IS NOT THE SAME ORB. it might be a earlier version, it might be a test version, it might be an unreleased version, but IT IS NOT THE SAME THING. 19:12, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

what evidince do you have for them being npcs? 19:20, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

The fact that you cant see them in long distance with the orb??? Different ground level, impossible, you would be able to interact with them, we also know that JaGEx puts places likes this in the same plane but separated so that they cannot be seen, this is the case.

so the only evidince for them being npcs is that you cannot see them with the orb, and the only evidince for the orb being the same orb is that they are npcs, correct? 19:25, February 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Both of you stop fighting, again. Someone is going to use the ooo from the mithril door room, to find out if the stronghold can be seen from it. 19:26, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

elder demons
which dont u agree with:

you can see tham's skele after the quest

tham is a elder demon

elder demons drop bones instead of ashes 01:06, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

im not trying to start fights, nor am i trying to be immature. im trying to improve the wiki, and it seems to me as though u- or less likly me- misread the thammaron article. it would be nice if you would answer the question above, and be constructive rather then destructive. 15:36, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

ah. ok. so what ur saying is that the ashes/skeleton idea isnt worth mentioning on the article? 15:42, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism
This edit was clearly not vandalism. Removed it because it appeared on the wanted pages list. 21:13, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

zilyana
it was her, not a random icyene unless jagex changed it. i can look now if u want. and gl getting rid of this.

21:16, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

[http://services.funorb.com/m=forum_fo/l=0/forums.ws?0,1,106,57343,goto,3 here u go, 4th post down. ]

21:54, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

after i get a new keybord, ill work on that. 22:20, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

RE: YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME
I'm in my signature stealin' ur names 18:46, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Surge Spells
While I do like to have the animations perfect, there is no way to pre-plan a CAMREC without talking to the NPC. As well, having the extra space causes wider width, leaving more room for error when uploading. In other words, it's harder to stay within the 500kb max of RS:IMP. For all my animations, I prefer to talk, whether it be like the current (or previous) version of Zanik's crossbow special attack, or the spells, I like to keep it as it is.

If you feel that you can do better, I applaud you to do so. As it is, This is how all the animations for the spell re-works are in the raw format on my HDD right now. 20:01, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

"I know you want your modified image to be shown, but the colors must be as showed ingane and not fake colours"
There is no such rule. If there was, it would be stupid. Anything underground is ridiculously darkened to the point of being a black blob.--Agamemnus 13:57, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Ohaiderr
I lol'd Coelacanth0794 14:48, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Chaotic Rapier
If we say it's been confirmed on forums, it must be cited. As the trivia is true, and not hurting anyone, it will remain. For the second time, I will ask you to stop reverting. 06:18, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Stop reverting the edit. The fact must be confirmed. You say its confirmed, but where? You cannot assume its true because players say so. 06:23, July 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * This is your warning. See RS:3RR. Do not revert Chaotic rapier or I will block you for a short time. 06:30, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: bro.
"Bro thats old and just a demo, you gonna tell me we're getting "sleeveless" Pl8's now?" Yes I am. Why would they design such a thing, when they aren't going to use it. BTW, it is a leaks page, not a page of which it is sure what will be updated, as that is the Future updates page. The plate got leaked, and i placed it there. The things that are there are not sure leaks, like the world map leak is also not a leak then, as it could also be they designed that for fun. NO! OF COURSE NOT! And they didn't design the plate for fun either! 06:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

K'rill
Yes, i will try. :) 13:16, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Reverting
Whenever you revert, provide a reason. Why did you revert this image? 10:21, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Roflmao I am enhancing the colours, not actually changing them manually. Since when was this "baaaad"? Many of the creatures in Featured Images have been tweaked, I see no one else complaining. 09:35, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re: KBD photo
Yeah! I was already planning this, but Jagex are working in a new KBD. But since you asked, I can take KBD's photo Monday or Tuesday, when i will pay my P2P. Then when it is updated, I screenshot again! :D 21:31, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Done! :D 21:14, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Helmet of trials
L O L  06:31, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Z-buffering
Look, I don't want to start a revert war with you. The term "z-buffering" is not a name; it's not a proper noun. If it were, which it is not, then there would be a reason for it to be capitalized. That's like capitalizing the "p" in particle effects. The letter z merely refers to the z-axis, or the depth coordinate of the game engine. As such, there really is no reason for it to remain capitalized. 05:08, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * If Jagex calls it "Z-buffering" (which they did) we will call it the same. 05:16, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * (Not meaning to help in the war here) but Jagex called it "z-buffering" and "Z-buffer" according to the news post on the homepage (not counting the title of the news post, of course). 05:19, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops sorry, I just meant the "z-buffer" part (: 05:20, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * You know what I meant. I did not use "name" to mean "noun." Of course z-buffering is a noun. And what credible Google source did you find that tells you that both the z and the b should be capitalized? I too did a search and the results were mixed. Usually, the z and the b would be capitalized in the article title simply because it is a title. Jagex capitalized it in the title, but if you look at the actual post, it's not capitalized at all with only one exception. This is a really stupid argument; I'd prefer that we stop arguing on this subject. Thanks, 05:22, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know what gave you the impression that I lost this little argument, but I don't think you're understanding me at all. And anyway, it does not follow any capitalization rule to capitalize the z, so I really don't know where you're coming from. 05:33, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

If it appears that way to you, so be it. The fact is, it's not just a "name and as such requires [sic] to follow the 'Upper letter' rule." If that were the case, then every term would require a capital letter. I implore you to learn about capitalization before you make such remarks. Additionally, as you may or may not know, the "z" refers to the z-axis, or the depth axis in a coordinate system. Because of this, the z must remain lowercase. A capital z in any mathematical reference denotes the set of natural numbers, which would not make any sense at all. Also, please don't violate RS:3RR as you just did with that last edit. 05:45, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has you now; Z-buffering. 05:46, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, I was just trying to explain why it wasn't capitalized... 05:52, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Yk'Lagor - Animation Blending
Mind showing me where exactly it says that Yk'Lagor is the first monster to use Animation blending, or that he uses it at all? 20:23, September 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, unless there was Confirmation from Jagex I don't believe that line should be there. There is no proof except for your eyes... which could be wrong. Besides, why would they do it for Yk'Lagor but not the other bosses introduced with the Occult floors? 05:31, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks :). Anyway, let me know if you manage to find out. If aren't able to, however, I would like it removed. Jagex often uses little tricks to make it SEEM like they are doing something even though they aren't - like the "motion blur" effect of fairies wings, which was mentioned in a Dev Blog to actually be built into their models. 05:51, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Haasghenahk images
Hey, just wanted to say thanks for uploading the images. Appreciate it. :) 23:39, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

/* Zaros and Religions */
If Religion has no place on wiki, we should start editing all of the pages about Gods... 05:52, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Can i has 4k plz?
I'm actually supposed to be doing my homework right now, so I'd ask someone else, like Psycho. :3 -- 23:38, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

"Merchanting" is a slang word.
Slang words should not be used to describe things unless they are themselves being described.

Please see this:

http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Jakezing2

...for more information.

--Agamemnus 17:40, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, merchanting indeed is a slang word, however, that doesn't mean we can't use it. Nobody is going to understand what you are talking about if you say trading at ge. Buying bronze arrows for training ranged is trading at ge too, but it's not even close to merchanting. 17:47, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just read again what you just said.--Agamemnus 02:31, October 9, 2010 (UTC)

re:File:Weight distribution.png
Tranz ownz 18:49, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * And btw, quest reward scrolls have trans too? and the thing looks ugly with blocks background, but it looks better here. 18:52, October 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ders a bog in ur userpeag
As long as the clip is under 30 seconds or something like that. Can't remember. :O Anyway, I have to go to bed nao. -- 03:53, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

RE:UMAD?
No, I read the book in high school and did a presentation and you can't imagine how many people tried to 'correct' me when I was working on the presentation (2006 so the movie was out on DVD and everyone had seen it). I read the book, I should know. 03:19, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * In the book, they are described differently than what is in that movie, and they look more like the tri-pods in the movie than what was described in the book. And it's a book, how do they "look" similar if you never literally see them?  03:55, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yk'lagor
It says significant demons. As he is clearly significant, he is one. Also, please do not refer to me as son, as I'm more than likely older than you and definitely not a child of yours. If you would like other opinions I will be happy to add them. But due to the fact that there are 5 demons, and Kal'ger has been confirmed to be the last one, it can be assumed without speculation that Yk'lagor is clearly one. Therefore I would ask that you stop reverting that. But, in the spirit of 3RR I will not revert till you have had a chance to respond. 22:22, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Your own image. It says "significant Kal'gerions are generals in the army" Then it talks about Yk'lagor, who "thinned his ranks by forcing them to kill each other". Why would he have "ranks" if he wasn't a general. All the evidence points in that direction, while it doesn't state it explicitly, and I will be asking Jagex for clarification on this topic soon. 00:13, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, see that's where we disagree. I don't believe this is speculation. I believe this a logical analysis of the case in point. Add in the facts that they look the same, all drop notes, and have similar names. Now riddle me this...why would Yk'lagor a stronger demon be ranked lower than generals? And nothing said Kal'ger isn't one of his own generals, I always thought that's what it meant. I will ask Jagex, but based on the information I have shown, it's not speculation so much as an educated guess. 00:26, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

K'ril's name is way different. It's just his name. It's not NAME (the) ADJECTIVE. Kal'gerion (in my opinion), means they are "Of Kal'ger". Meaning it would only be the ones inside Daemonheim. At least that's my view. 00:39, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not going to add it until we get proof from Jagex. 02:52, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Do not remove Yk'Lagor's name from the page again. There's a lot of information on the wiki we can't cite, but it's still valid. Continuing this edit war will be considered an act of vandalism and may result in a block. 13:45, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Transparency
Thanks for the comments ;) The only problem with the images you have taken there, is that they MUST be taken with lighting detail TURNED OFF. I am not sure if that has been done in those two images. I ask you, could we leave those images there for now, and in the future, could you retake them with lighting detail turned off? It would save everyone a lot of time :) Thanks, 07:52, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I done Harlakk but I can't do the other image, since the lighting detail on the correct version is correct :( BTW: Harlakk image did not update correctly, so look on the article page for the updated version. 12:59, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

The 2nd trans was even more fun. 19:45, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Nex
Hey, the point of the revert was so that information that Halo and I were working on was not lost when you added your information. I have done my best to transfer your edits to merge onto the page (which is what you should when you see edit conflict). Cheers :) 04:51, January 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, if you feel you need to remove something that doesn't belong on that page, please do it on the current version. Thanks. 04:53, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

cool images
Wow, cool images you uploaded! 20:42, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

RE:AA
I have the antialiasing box ticked on the magic wand tool in GIMP, what more do I need to do :S 19:06, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Images
How dare you make images that are better than mine  19:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * When you are putting those detail images into the articles, please do not make them any bigger than 100px if they are going in the top corner. Cheers- 06:09, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, can you provide a decent edit summary; sometimes it does not upload correctly and then you cannot tell what changes have been made. Thanks, btw: nice shot of Nex. 20:34, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

sure
sure, ill add you a section, would u like it pre-set up or a blank page?-- 10:12, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

done
done -- 20:34, February 4, 2011 (UTC)