User talk:Sannse

Keylogger advertisement (quite a few actually...)
Hi. Angela is not responding or anything a the moment, so I'll have to rely on you to remove this keylogger advertisement. Keyloggers break the JaGex Rules. Infact, there are quite a few. They are all Google advertisements by the way.

Heading: Hidden Keylog Recorder

Description: Capture all passwords & read emails Used by law enforcement agencies.

HTML link: http://www.awarenesstech.com/Monitoring-Software/Consumer/Keylogger-lnd.html?gclid=COPquObsjY8CFRI5agodJGXTfQ

That was only the first one.

Heading: Buy WebWatcher KeyLogger

Description: The only key logger used by intelligence agencies worldwide.

HTML Link:http://www.awarenesstech.com/Monitoring-Software/Consumer/Key-logger-lnd.html?gclid=CPmmiMWPmI8CFRI5agodJGXTfQ

That was the second one.

Heading: Undetectable Keylogger

Description: Secretly record every keystroke! View Remotely! Money back guarantee

HTML Link: http://www.awarenesstech.com/Monitoring-Software/Consumer/Keylogger-lnd.html?gclid=CPmu7IWmjY8CFRUsagodyT7GeQ

That was the third and final one.

Thanks. Emo s  09:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've reported these. Please could you tell me the page you saw them on?  And what skin you were using at the time?  That will help us track them down and get them stopped.  Thanks -- sannse (talk) 17:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not really sure what page I saw them on; infact, they appeared on quite a few. I am currently using the Monobook skin, and I was using Monobook as well back then. 09:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * We've blocked these, although we will have to watch out for new ones. If you see them, please let me know!  Thanks -- sannse (talk) 19:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Carbon Monobook
Hey, I noticed you take part in a lot of our skin discussion and I have a question. The wiki's monobook custom, Carbon, has a problem where the main page shows up as white instead of the normal scroll colour. An image is on this page. Why does this happen? Thanks.  Chicken7 >talk>RfA 08:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

hello
ms sannse, i am seeking your help on an idea i have proposed for the wikis, i was thinking about creating a high court system to give users with a reasonable excuse a fair trial to legally discuss the ban, and flaming can be advoided, the thing is, banned user's talks are either redirected or ignored oe even protected (making them virtually untouchable) so, i sent the proposal to the yew grove, but they think that users will have to be unblocked to do so and that can create problems, thereore, can you help in that making the court hearing page accessable to the banned user, but blocking him/her from all other pages(excluding talk)? thank you. because i really ned your help on this one and i know it will not take off with the users thinking it will have to be a democracy to do this.  Btzkillerv has entered the building!   19:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that's not possible, you can't be selective about bans in that way -- sannse (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * sigh, okay then 

Btzkillerv has entered the building!   12:25, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Forumadminship
There was recently a discussion about a user being given forumadminship. The user, known as InstantWinston, has achieved consensus to become a forumadmin but not a sysop. As a local bureaucrat, I do not have the power to give another user forumadminship myself. Therefore, I request that you grant the necessary user rights. Thanks in advance. Dtm142 00:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for missing this message. There is a technical problem with this, forumadmin isn't showing on the rights page for me, but I'll get someone from the technical team to fix that.  Hopefully I'll be able to do this soon. -- sannse (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Has it been fixed yet? (just wondering, not being pushy) 23:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

That would be amazing if you actually got it working! O_o 08:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

We're all routing for the technical team. Go, team, go! 15:46, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi sorry for the delay, I've not been around much over the holiday. Nor have the tech team of course :) so we haven't been releasing new code.  But the fix has been added to the code and should go live next Tuesday.  I've also set things so that bureaucrats have the forum access rights.   -- sannse (talk) 16:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to check up on the progress of the code change. It’s Wednesday (at least where I am) and the changes do not seem to have been made yet.  Was it Tuesday next week, the 13th, that you were talking about?   22:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Argh, seems the fix didn't work! I've talked to Nef (they guy working on this) and he can't see why his changes didn't take.  He's going to have another go.  Sorry about this! -- sannse (talk) 10:05, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * And he's fixed it :) looks to be working to me now -- sannse (talk) 10:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

New problem: I can now see all of the special mod stuff, but I can't actually do anything. I tried to deal with a report, and it said I'm not authorized to access this area. 20:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

More forum related requests :-P Could you remove “My first Category” from the forums and update to the latest stable version (if it won’t kill the forum) when you have time? In addition, the forumadmin permission does not seem to work for bureaucrats. 22:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!!!!
11:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)


 * And to you and all on RuneScape Wiki! -- sannse (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)