RuneScape:WikiCapes/Requests

Start a new nomination

If you would like to submit a new Wikicape, create a new section here with a picture of the Wikicape and a description of it. Consensus will be determined in the same manor used on RS:FI. The capes must look similar to the other Wikicapes in that they have a trim and an image centered within it, as to prevent the capes from becoming visually inconsistent. The intention of the cape must be serious, so an "Over 9000" Wikicape would not be allowed. Finally, the cape must have a clear relation to an aspect or practice on the wiki. Keep in mind that when you propose a cape, you may not upload it to the wiki unless the proposal passes. You will have to use a hosting site such as Imageshack or Photobucket.

Current nominations
00:38, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Wikicape of Applying Transparency
I suggest this transparency wikicape. 20:27, October 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - As nom. 20:27, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - As 2nd voter. Kinda shocked Chicken didn't make one. 20:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you got a good idea, you can request them at This guy 's  talk (try clicking the links and u'd be surprised ) 21:03, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Holy cow! I've never seen someone use code to make it seem like someone else! 02:43, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's amazing, isn't it 20:28, October 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - Meh, don't see why not. 15:49, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * btw, I don't think you should have uploaded it before this passes. 15:49, October 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose Image - I support the cape in principal, but not the cape image. The cape itself is supposed to have an image within it symbolic of whatever the cape is for, similar to all the others. The image should also be transparent. I had to delete the version you uploaded to the wiki, because you can't host it here unless this passes. 16:05, October 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - I don't like the image, if you created a better one, I would support, as it is logical in principal. 09:26, October 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * Pending oppose - Get a better image, this is "Wikicape of Applying Transparency" but I see a semi-transparent box around it (ie. poor trans job). See this, I fixed it here. 21:10, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Could we have a transparent wikicape? Like, umm, this? 22:37, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, much better indeed! 22:41, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose image - If you insist on having the grid, then it should be a small fully opaque grid, such as File:Checker-16x16.png, only bigger, and it should only appear in the middle of the cape. If you want the image itself to be transparent, although I do find it rather gimmicky, then it should be something more imaginative. 22:49, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose Image - The cape is okay, image isn't.  22:45, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Any suggestions what image should be in the center? and should the checkered cape stay, or should it have semi-transparency, or should it be colored? Any suggestions are appreciated. 12:48, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Like this one then? It has an icon... 03:00, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * The checkerboard effect needs to be removed from the cape itself, as it would create an inconsistency in the capes we do not want to set a precedent for allowing. I would support the 2x2, fully opaque transparency grid in the center, like the image Psycho mentioned. 22:47, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * But that 16x16 thing is ugly... it is also quite small. I think it should atleast have a fade out or something and be bigger, if that is going to be used. What if i remove the checkered things of this cape, and just place that round checkered thing on a new cape. Would that be ok? 19:22, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't thinking of leaving it the same size, this is what I had in mind. 22:06, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

Wikicape of Wikicape creation
I suggest this cape for people who make wikicapes. If there are people who make much wikicapes too, they can also get this cape.

Neutral - idc if this will be accepted, i just wanna give it to chicken7, and if there come more ppl making capes, i'll give it to them too.(PS:@zamO_o: whoops i did it again^^) 13:50, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Strong oppose - Make your own unofficial award, Wikicapes, in my biased opinion, are for more than 10 people to receive in a year, not just once for the whole span of RS Wiki. -- 14:27, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * If more than 10 ppl per year make wikicapes... 16:18, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Cause I love the image. 16:05, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Storng oppose - I love the image, but this is the most ridiculous idea I've ever heard. >.< 16:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Got a better idea? i just like making wikicapes... 16:18, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Epic picture. 19:48, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - Per Liquid. 22:46, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - But it's not a strong oppose. There are only two people even remotely eligible to receive such a cape (you and Chicken), so it's not a great reason to create one, like with the transparency cape. Nice image, though. 22:41, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * There might be other people who want will make much and nice capes in the future...

Support - That's just..epic.. :O!!!! Gamertooth17 22:52, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Strong support - See this barnstar. It displays awesomeness as well. -- 11:50, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * We aren't wikipedia. So that's mostly irrelevant.   19:49, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know it wasn't a great summary, but I thought you would at least understand it was only an opinion! 01:45, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Looks cool. 11:50, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Wikicape of Guide making
(might need a better name) I got 2 designs for this. The one is with the lumbridge guide like suggested below, and the other one is with only his staff.
 * pros for staff version: it is more detailed that it is a staff, and a question mark. It is also clear this is the sage's staff, which is an icon for guides/tutors.
 * cons for staff version: (feel free to add em here)
 * pros for sage version: it has the icon for guides/tutors on it, which shows better that it is about guides.
 * cons for sage version: less clear because of the size of the sage.

Support both, prefer staff version - I think that one is the best because of the pros i added above. 15:35, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Support, Sage Version - The Sage version is the only of the two eligible, because the image has to be centered correctly on the cape. 15:44, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? I still got a blank version with these colors, so maybe i can fix it. 18:09, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh come on, we don't have to be that strict. I mean, I can see the problem with trans wikicape, but this... 19:48, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Support Sage Version - Per Steler. 18:14, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I just don't think we need a cape for this. The one on the right side is way better than the one on the left side btw.. 16:27, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support the one on the right - Cuz I even supported wikicape creation :O 19:48, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Both their icons are far too big. The cape is supposed to have a small icon in the middle of the cape. 20:42, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Requests
Here you could place suggestions for capes. These suggestions should also be serious, as they still have to pass the nomination above. Please also sign here.


 * Better idea for transparency wikicape. 19:27, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good idea for a "Guide cape" 04:51, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * How about the Lumbridge sage on a cape, i'm not great with making pics so you can make it if it sounds good. 05:23, October 23, 2010 (UTC)