User talk:Thebrains222

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100919030022/thebrains222/images/a/a7/Wiki2.png

Defining IP Addresses!

Try out admin!*
*On my personal wiki: Thebrains222 Wiki If you still want to...

Please make a new header using this as an example  

3K edits
CONGRATZ! ...kbai 00:42, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

First, i mean second
Lol I have my own archive. 06:39, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Defining bureaucrats project
lolwut? 11:11, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not bad. 07:15, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, make the section... sections (editing). And maybe to the format the the DAP and DBP have. You may want to poke LiquidNub about permission doing it. 07:41, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

When's the defining rollbacks project? 07:52, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Why do we need these? Normal users understand what it means to be a normal user. Anyone active enough to read/participate in these will have rollback. I just think you are over-complicating things...again. The reasons we did one for sysops and are doing one for 'crats is because most people don't understand them, and end up giving too much weight to it. By how this is going we are going to be doing oversight, staff, helpers, VSTF, and facebook connect users next. 15:59, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's just a stage people go through when learning how things work around here. Most of those people aren't going to know something would exist/bother to read it. And you don't need a project for a 1 sentence thing about IPs. Facebook connect was a joke...I was semi-serious about some of the others. 19:14, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

SigRequests
On this page can you use -> since it doesn't create a red link? 05:38, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:The ant
It's just an image I found on Uncyclopedia. If you want it on your userpage, just put this:

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/f/f1/Crawlinggnat.gif

-- 11:43, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

"Sentra's Spam"
You know you can just delete it. It's by no means a discussion. I'm assuming you are keeping it for fun...but yeah. 19:17, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Defining IP's
I must say that I never thought of it before. However, I doubt that this is necesasry. The reason that we did defining crats and sysop is because those are active usergroups who are frequently misrepresented/misunderstood. IP's rarely do much of interest community-wise, and I've never seen someone misunderstand the role of IP's. If you REALLY want to, I won't stop you, but I would have to give it a tentative no. 23:59, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ask Azaz about this. He's the one who confirmed the crats project, and he'll have a better idea for the time-line for your project. 02:13, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I really don't care. As long as ample time is allowed for discussion, either way is fine with me.  02:17, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Good luck!
...with not getting attacked by spiders :D 03:15, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

IP Address thingy
I would like to be a moderator for your (useless?) defining IPs project. And since I'm awesome and unbiased, I would be... an awesome and unbiased moderator. 16:29, September 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * You say I am not awesome or unbiased? Liesz0r. And I answered yes to most of the questions. 10:49, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Transparency
I noticed you "applied transparency" to File:Girlymenfakebeard.jpg. I'm going to guess that at this point you're aware a white background is not transparency (it was a few months back), but in case you don't, it's not. 21:54, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's because JPG files don't support transparency -- 21:57, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Moderator for Defining IP Adresses
Hello, my name is Spineweilder, and I'd like to be a moderator for the Defining IP Adresses project. When you come back from camp, please tell me what to do :) Thanks. 22:51, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Heyy, I'd like to help with the defining Ips project. Admins...bah, Bureauacrats...who the hell are they? Ips...THAT, I can help with. So, when you see this please give me a yell on my talk if you're happy for me to help out with moderation. Thanks - 12:47, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

I'll be glad to help you on this project, point me in the right direction and just tell me what to do. Thanks, 07:05, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Defining IP's
I have read and fully understood the Defining IP's page.

Usually people define IP's as unknowledgable, vandals, not helpful..etc. But I understand that some IP's can be helpful, e.g. correcting grammar mistakes, fixing content issues, those are the good IP's. The bad IP's are the ones that constantly do severe vandalism, e.g blanking pages, putting inappropiate content into some pages, especially the ones that are viewed the most.

I was never an active anti-vandal, though I revert their edits when I see some damage on pages. I have only reported once in my experience of editing, mostly because someone else reported before I could. Usually when I see an IP vandal, I tell them not to do it again or they'll be blocked from editing. Most of the IP's I've spoken to has changed their ways and became helpful editors and even made user accounts to become more noticeable.

The reason I want to be a moderator is to tell people that not all IP's are vandals, because some are helpful as well. Another reason I want to be a moderator is to get more involved in the community. Thank you for reading. 20:51, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Yes to most of them. - User:Pharos 5

=D luckily, I think I can fairly and thuroughly (big head, yes) answer any of those questions except for the oneon how Ips see us. But I will have a think about that oneand give you a yell if I think I can do it and nobody else wants to - 13:29, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hey again thebrains, I think I could do the first or last one- I think the last one suits me better. 23:35, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:User:Matthew2602/Guestbook
No.  02:18, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Weakness categories
Oh so you started making those. I didn't because I thought someone might've already made them and I didn't want duplicates...

'''BUT I SHALL HELP YOU WITH DA CATEGORIZATION!!! *SUMMONS ARMY OF CATEGORIZATION IMPS LOANED FROM EVIL1888*''' 02:20, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's why I summoned the imps. ....  THIS IS SO NOT COOL!!!!  02:28, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Should we have a category for things that aren't weak to anything like Chicken? 02:33, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well what do you think they are? Okay, what about Dramen Tree Spirit, weak to fire spells. Should we have a category for that? 02:40, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Putting it in infoboxes would be really good.. 02:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * What you said, the code for making it do it automatically. 02:51, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I already am. I'm on Bestiary:Levels higher than 100 and I'm going down the list. 02:56, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry I'm going a bit slow. Until my broadband turns on early next week I'm stuck with dial-up.  02:58, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * For San Tojalon should we go with melee? Cause it says "Melee works well". 03:02, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Common sense? What common sense? Okay. Should we have a category for weak to poison?  03:40, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * A major weakness. 03:45, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. 03:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did he include poison? What are the correct names? 04:05, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just don't get what #lc does. 04:36, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * ... dude ... what happened to all the pages in Category:Weak to poisoned weapons? 04:58, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Evil strikes back...
 * It appears so.... LET'S GO RAID HIS TALK PAGE. 05:09, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe he didn't remove them all. 05:15, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ice giant = CATEGORY FAIL ... but I can't figure out how to fix it ...? 05:22, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Evil strikes back II... 05:39, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * So you know, that code on RS:UH was me testing if it changed in order. (1 2, 3 4, 5 6, 7 8, 9 10 etc) If it worked, I was hoping to have my userpage change on purge to a certain set of colours. By the way sorry If i occasionally miss a "p" in words; my p key doesn't seem to always respond... 05:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not changing the red. Okay, but do they all have the poison category added if they are weak to it?

'''WOAH WOAH WAIT!!!! YOUR SAYING THAT YOU CATEGORIZED ALL THE MONSTERS UP TO LVL 63!!!!????? DUDE!!!! YOUR A BOT!!!!!''' 07:07, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've already started. How would AWB help? So yes then on the poison? 07:39, September 18, 2010

(UTC)
 * It just occurred to me. I'm not gonna be on tomorrow cause my grandmother is going back home, and her laptop is the only computer in the house that can actually use dial-up (Go figure) so I won't be on tomorrow (but I will be in the morning) and after that I can't go on until we get broadband which will be, according to the dodo people "Tuesday at the latest". (It was supposed to be on on friday ) And I'll also be getting off really soon (homework ) so maybe I can't finish it. Well I can, butsomeone might finish it before me... 07:54, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Weaknesses
I have added weaknesses on the infobox monster template. It only works if the monster has one weakness for the moment, couldn't be bothered to the full code at the moment. It should still be a much smaller job to categorize every one of them. They will probably all categorize the next time the pages are purged. Good luck on categorizing them!

03:52, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Seeing as how the multiple categories weaknesses aren't uniform from page to page, it would either have to be done manually, or add a chunk of code on the infobox page, which I plan on doing Sunday (day after tomorrow). Sorry for the inconvenience ! 03:56, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

I'm afraid that even if you two uniformize it completely at the moment, it will eventually always end up un-uniformized, so I will (try to) make one which supports most, if not all, ways to write it in there. Anyway, we're not even sure if it works yet, so don't thank me so soon. 04:03, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

I'll get on it right away (poisonned thing). 04:04, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Done the poison thing. About the purge : I personally have tried purging the pages themselves and not the category pages, after that, they appeared in the category on the page, but not on the maing category page, even after a few purges (see Unicorn for example). I really don't know what the problem is but my guess is time will tell (or some code-junkie user ). 04:09, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's an issue. I think I could you something to locate the words in the weakness cell, but I'm going to have to think on how to approach this. Anyway, I'm off for tonight. Cya. 04:21, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

I am about to add the thing on the infobox monster page and I would like to know, which of the following categories should I add ?

Weak to:
 * Silverlight
 * Darklight (I will probably fusion this with silverlight)
 * Holy water (same as above)
 * Fire spells
 * Water/earth/air spells if they are applicable
 * Silver and stuff (vamps, juveniles and vyrewatches)

Can't think of any other at the moment, tell me if I am missing a major one.

03:21, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, since most of them aren't being implemented, and that only existing categories are, I will only use the ones I had been using before (slash, stab, crush, melee, magic, range, poison) and will go on from there if it works. As for evil, I saw (s)he was working on it but seeing as (s)he returned it to how it was before, I'm assuming (s)he's stumped so I'm trying a different approach.

03:49, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm sorry about that, I tried to do something but it failed pathetically, sorry. I think someone who is really good at coding could find the problem in my code (or write a new one entirely), but for the moment, I'm a bit code-sick. Sorry!

04:14, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

I pretty much thought that last message was me saying I was stopping, but if you need me to write it in words, there it is: I quit! EMOTICON ALERT!!!

Sorry about that.

04:26, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Category:Weak to poisoned weapons
They are not weak to the weapon, just able to be poisoned, which is like 85% of all monsters. Is someone really going to go into a category of 1000+ monsters looking for something? 04:30, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I altered the template so if it contains 'melee', 'magic', 'ranged', 'slash', 'crush', 'stab' (in any case) it will give that appropriate category. And yes, I am that good.  05:20, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I saw that, I forgot the limit of #replace, should be fixed now. 05:40, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * No... I'll keep going though. 05:43, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

RS:CE
Whe you have a chance can you fill out RuneScape:Community Events/Member requests/Thebrains222|this page as i have had a request for both of us to go through and evaluation request because everyone should. Also make sure you unhide the FIMG thing there and add a time stamp. Thanks. 10:45, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Categorizing
How did you manage to separate those that were weak to stab attacks (or any other attacks) before you categorized? 02:09, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nicely done  02:13, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Just dropping by to say thanks for you support on things such the kicks thread and nuke thread. Sorry if you felt like I gave in on the nukes thread, but I didn't think there was enough support for aether side to get anything more passed even if I wanted to. 02:50, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

New Signature
Nice =o So small and compact. 04:03, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I tried that once :D! Template:Signatures/ZamorakO o <- I grew kinda bored with it however, and thought I'd let some people who create signatures create me one, and then it was talk liek a pirate day! 04:07, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Infobox Monster
I have the code done but am waiting for wikia to respond to a request to have the string limit increased. 04:40, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * When this is done I'll do it myself . 04:43, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

RS:MAINTENANCE
Hey, I looked at the board you set up for page maintenance. I'm beginning to think that it would indeed be better to not have a board, and just have the pages set up like we do for RS:D. This is because the current board you've set up includes things like RuneScape:Placeholder and RuneScape:Templates. In addition, it has the base pagename instead of the subpagename, which detracts from the idea. Would it be alright if I changed it to what I proposed, or do you want it as is? 19:31, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright. That works, I'd just like to figure out that pesky subpage problem.   17:49, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:AWB
Just wait for a crat to give you the flag since you already signed at the forum. Azaz gave it to me but then shortly after left, so you will just have to wait till another crat comes on. 09:50, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

I believe they all are. 09:55, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Holidays
Holidays are this week and next week. 06:54, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Holidays
Holidays are this week and next week. Only problem with going to Gold Coast is i won't be in Melbourne for the Grand Final. 06:54, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

I don't care about Rugby either. AFL on the other hand, is the best sport there is. 07:01, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

new categories
Is there truly a point to ones that may never ever be used?-- 08:15, September 21, 2010 (UTC)