User talk:Rwojy/Archive 8

Archive 1 Archive 2

:D
SPAM He has knocked four times. 01:00, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * SRSLY He has knocked four times. 01:05, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Lol
What is a feature of rich test editor?? 02:12, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Template
I just like to ask :D just to be nice 04:06, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wrong one :/ but its still considered Achieving it instead of taking it off 06:11, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Personal I think spam is "asdsrfr4e" but things like that i have only seen one person ever taking it out of their page a lot 06:20, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with that but people dont follow them and who said "Rules are meant for breaking?" because that seams like what most people do 06:28, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * The one im dealing with is been apart of this wiki for 3 years :/ 06:32, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea a yg might be good to see if we can update it and see what the wiki sees about the xmas things being "spam" 06:39, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Some people would say thats not a conversation but everything (apart from spam spam) can become a conversation 06:49, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Spam
SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM 08:17, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE: HTML help
How about the links? What do you want to link to? 09:13, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've made the changes. Is this what you wanted? 09:18, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL. Okay. I guessed that was what you wanted, but I wasn't too sure... you mentioned sitewide css, so I presumed it was the DIV tag. Let me work on it. 09:23, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

The USERNAME magic word uses JS. It inserts the "insertusername" class into a blank SPAN tag, and when the page loads, it replaces the contents of the SPAN with the username. try putting anything here, and JS replaces it your username

becomes: try putting anything here, and JS replaces it your username

Since the username is added AFTER the page loads, the "title" of a link can only be changed using another JS script. This requires modifying the site script page. Do you want that? 09:52, February 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay. Sorry that I couldn't be of much help. 10:00, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ip block
I know central can help with proxies, however looking at it, it just appears to be a dynamic IP in Singapore. I'd keep it at a week, any further incidents can be dealt with month long blocks and a message left on the talk page. =) 14:32, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * -poke-
 * I saw what you did! 03:29, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * No one can ever make me! 03:34, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

:D
GRATZ ON 6000 EDITS!!! 05:13, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just clicked your talk then i saw you got 6k edits whats so bad about that!! 05:17, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I check the talk not the userpage first!! its my way and i was going to give you this and 3900 edits :D 05:20, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Kirk says HAX!! 05:26, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Collasping stuff
I think it works now, I moved the positioning into a new tag and its okay. Test it out  15:56, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * There lol  23:14, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Bukkit
[ wai u use mai bukkit???] -- 00:30, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your focus sights are OVER 9000!!!!!!!!! -- 03:12, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you see that picture Cncko uploaded? -- 03:15, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Are auto-confirmed users accounts that are over 4 days old? And what was the Mod Poppy incident? -- 03:19, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I remember that. -searches- -- 03:24, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Where should File:4149arma.png go? It seems to have a lot of information, but it would look weird on an article. -- 03:41, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Reverting
Hello, I noticed that on your last revert you didn't leave a custom message in the undo summary. Please read the top of my userpage. I have noticed recently that nobody here really knows why you don't rollback AGF, so I put the explanation there :). Ajraddatz Talk 02:04, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I gets it. I just have noticed that a whole lot of people here know that you shouldn't rollback good faith edits, but don't know why. You seemed like one of them :) Ajraddatz Talk 02:12, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with you. I don't look through an article's history every time I edit it. That would take too long :S. Unfortunately, then there is no point in undoing and those people may as well just rollback... Well no, they shouldn't. Anyways, nice talking to you :D Ajraddatz Talk 02:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Barbarian Assault
Did you guys stop playing yet? Or do you need 1 more person and want me to log on? --Liquidhelium 02:28, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, then. --Liquidhelium 02:32, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

On a side note, I noticed that Bukkit was a page. It is utterly useless, so I started a VFD for it. Please go vote and support the deletion of the useless page! (Side note: I would have marked it with a speedy deletion, since I certainly think it qualifies, but I decided to get a wiki concensus instead since I realized that the speedy deletion won't actually occur if you're the admin who gets to that page first.) Cheers! --Liquidhelium 02:53, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I knew you would oppose it, judging on the state of your userpage and your signature. But I wanted to alert you to that page in case you weren't watching the Recent Changes. It's generally best to have a bipartisan debate. --Liquidhelium 02:56, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. I was thinking that you might be too busy playing Runescape to notice. --Liquidhelium 03:05, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Template
Heh move it to User:Man tag1/Template and i got another 50 sections means achieve time 04:47, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * You moved it to User:Man Tag1/Template >.> 04:52, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I bet you were http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/129077843833221725.jpg 05:01, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:I'M IN UR HOUSE SPAMMING UR PAGE
Hai rwojy 05:23, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Dude what are you doing with the clues sheets, that external link is going to help tons of people.
 * http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/alien.jpg = You 08:23, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Bukkit
Per Max (whose comment can be found here), Talk pages are for discussing improvements to the article. Since the talk page for the Bukkit article is obviously not discussing anything of the sort, and since the community consensus (with the exception of you) favors either wiping the talk page or moving it to the userspace.

Would you be willing to host such a page? Or do you know anyone that would? If not, then I will mark Talk:Bukkit for speedy deletion in accordance with the speedy deletion policy.

--Liquidhelium 20:04, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Just letting you know... The talk page was deleted, and the redirect was kept. The talk page has been copied over to User:Iiii I I I/Bukkit. Cheers, --Liquidhelium 20:41, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re: fail
One of the pages didn't load like the rest... Anyway, take 2 worked out better. I ran out of thing to use the letters for at the end... 03:49, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Valentines
lulz. 03:01, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Prayer Levels table
I was wondering why you reverted my creation of this feature? Dark avorian 22:59, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Corporeal Beast
With regards to your edit here, Woox16's solo was the first solo caught on vid, and it is quite commonly accepted that he is the first person to solo the Corporeal Beast (even though there is a slight chance that that might not be true, I see where you're coming from), but take a look at Talk:Corporeal Beast. Other users accept that Woox16 is the first soloer as well (since he is the only one to provide proof for it), and if you are going to remove that piece of information (which has been there for months), I suggest you discuss it on the talkpage. For now, I'm re-adding that information. 02:22, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

That wasn't fail
Ok, fine, so I forgot to hit shift, and got 3 instead of #. That doesn't merit a FAIL in all capital letters, though, does it? >_< I had about 20 of those to fix, after I discovered that Attack level, Strength level, Defense level (but NOT Defence level), Prayer level, and Ranged level redirected to their respective skill pages, Slayer level was its own page with useless (aka repeated) information, and the other (skill name) level pages were nonexistent. To be consistent, I created all those pages (see my user contributions). Cut me some slack, alright? -- 02:39, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Can we please drop the issue of "bukkit"s? I already got Talk:Bukkit deleted, so I'm happy. -- 02:52, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, part of the reason I started this Yew Grove thread was to guard against something outrageous like Category:Bukkits or something like that. The other half was to get rid of useless categories like Category:Fire breathers in the spirit of the deletion of Category:Active users (if I recall correctly, it took you a while to remove the category from everyone's userpage). -- 02:57, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. So that's how his magic colon works. -- 03:14, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:
I made the change, so I shouldn't show up on recent pages. I don't care either way but was my edits being in recent changes really a bad thing? 23:37, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Consensus
I've read them already. I've consulted a few admins, and they all said that they would delete it if I marked it for speedy deletion. Even Iiii I I I, who was part of the category initially, agreed. -- 00:46, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. Ok I see. -- 00:53, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

On your block of 190.218.222.189, I believe they should have been warned instead of blocked. It seems like they were just testing what would happen with the percents of the log. They should have gotten test1 warning. 02:50, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * i hadn't known about that. Still, I personally feel that if you saw something cool like that and don't normally read everything that log would be pretty cool. I think they should of gotten a warning but meh your like this dude and your word is FINAL! 03:03, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * So by that logic anyone that 'accidentaly' blanks a page should be blocked. We should check for every person that has been warned and ban them. You should ban me then because I once accidently vandalized. Ban yourself too I'm sure you vandalized unknowinglingly. While your edit ban everyone on this wiki! 03:23, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Woot lol 03:42, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bot
Yeah, TLULbot will log its actions. It was based on AmauriceBot after all, and it would be a shame not to use the functions Amaurice wrote for logging. I plan on having it log any questionable submissions.
 * It will log in exactly the same manner that AmauriceBot does. There should be a link to the log on its userpage, the log is located here. Thanks for reminding me of something though; with my new GUI for the bot (a somewhat useless feature, but whatever) I added the ability to run tasks asynchronously. I don't think it logs correctly after this. Time to go fix that!

RE: Note
Oops. I knew I was forgetting something important when I was dealing with that test edit earlier... I'll make sure I remember to use that template in similar situations in the future though. Thanks for pointing that out to me. 07:24, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Re: Prayer Table
I would argue however. that a table like that, whilst somewhat clunky does serve a useful purpose. If/when I level up I'm interested in knowing what I now have available, perhaps i missed the level up scroll, or perhaps Jagex doesn't list all of the things I can do with it on it (admittedly Prayer is not the best example of this) and God only knows I'm not willing to go searching through all the inner menus of the skill reqs guide to find out what I've received.

RE: New Script (1)
Hello. I should be able to add such a link to the RC Revert script. The standard rollback links would respect the diff preference but a new "Rollback without Diff" link will always skip it. I may be able to get this done by the end of today. -- 15:23, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Orly?
I see that THE BUKKIT WILL SMITE NONBELIEVERS!. I'm still here. And I'm a nonbeliever. Quod erat demonstratum -- 02:46, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * It will happen eventually? Bah. That's about as useful as saying the sun will go out eventually. -- 02:49, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Evil Yanks
'Cause he's hardcore. He has knocked four times. 00:28, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Outdated articles?
Rwojy, the articles under Trivia may be useless/outdated. For one thing, many of the subpates of Trivia, with the exception of Cultural References, often just repeat the Trivia section at the bottom of their respective pages. Furthermore, much of the trivia is outdated. For example, this still describes the old Blast Furnace ore shop, which was updated some time ago. What should be done about these? I don't want to start yet another RfD. -- 02:49, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoa, didn't see that message. What do you mean by No bukkits? -- 02:50, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not suggesting that you delete them, no. I'd much rather see them improved. What I was really getting at here is that I don't know what to put there. Anything noteworthy to be put into the Trivia page would also be put onto the individual article's subpages. Thus, this is kind of a duplicate. But, if you think that it's worthy of a RfD, I'll give the Trivia pages a closer look tomorrow and possibly write the RfD then. (or tonight if I really feel like it). -- 03:01, February 19, 2010 (UTC) Oh, and buckets are inanimate objects, not gods. Quod erat demonstratum.
 * Mmhm. That's what I've been hearing ever since this. And I'm still perfectly fine. I'm still waiting for your so-called apocalypse. Anyways, I was just going through many of the articles again, and realized that the Trivia presented is often not even the full part found in the actual article. They're incomplete parts, which alone are much less note-worthy than the whole. However, I did notice that Trivia/Other is actually different also. So, if I ever get around to writing that, I'm going to say that Trivia/Other content should be placed on Trivia, and all the other subpages should be deleted. Cultural references is already its own page, so that should be fine. -- 03:09, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nope. I am reading the trivia and adding the reasonable ones that are not already found in the pages. I sometimes edit them for grammar also. I do not copy over any trivia that obviously doesn't belong (but I don't fact check anything either). -- 04:46, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Do me a favor and get on the irc channel? I want to ask you something where no one else can eavesdrop. It'll take a minute. 04:54, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

I have finished merging the articles. Since it's very late, I'm going to bed now. I plan to propose to delete the subpages of the Trivia article with the exception of Trivia/Other and Cultural References, since they are repeats of the Trivia found on the individual articles. Furthermore, many of the articles are not in alphabetical order, and are not inclusive. For example, Trivia/Quests does not include all the quests, Trivia/Skills does not include all the skills, etc. Many times, the trivia presented is just small fragments of the entire trivia found on the individual article page. Trivia/Other is actually something different and should be moved to the main Trivia page. Cultural References is already its own article so it doesn't matter. As a housekeeping duty, every page whose trivia section has a header that links to Trivia should have the link removed (I removed the links in the articled I edited). Any suggestions from your part? Do you think a RfD is even necessary, or do you think that this would qualify under the "Duplicate page" clause of speedy deletion? -- 04:59, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hah sleep is for the weak? It's over 9 am in Central Time. Get over here and vote. I got up at 7 am this morning. That's pretty good considering I slept at midnight. -- 15:10, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: teh vandal
I removed the protection for 2 reasons: If you consider the vandals terrorists who use terror tactics, we would be fearing them by protecting the page, therefore they win. Secondly, more importantly, I think it is overkill since the vandalism is always very quickly reverted. I don't really see the need for any userpage to be protected. 06:00, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it is because it corresponds with when I started going going anti-vandal crazy. 06:09, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * *tsk* *tsk* 06:25, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Hilite
Per Help:SpamTaskForce, could Ose and Grunny be added to the MediaWiki:Common.css/hilite section for VSTF? -- 05:37, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Special:Contributions/67.173.205.183
Looks like User:QBot lost the login session and started running anonymously, it should be fixed now though. Thanks for letting me know!

I've got the script up, unfortunately, it does not work with auto-refresh, because the refreshing literally wipes out any modifications that other scripts may have made to the page. There is a possibility to modify both the auto-refresh script and the rollback script so they can cooperate, but I haven't gotten around to making these changes yet.

If you use Opera, you can use Opera's built-in autorefresh that will be compatible with the rollback script, and other browsers may have similar extensions. But as you noticed, this isn't a very satisfactory solution. -- 05:47, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

New Page Creation Thingy
I have disabled that. Go to Preferences->Editing and check Use blank page as default for creating a new page. It's the third to last box. -- 13:19, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Where did my Content go?
I'd like to know what happened to my discussion of Orb behavior PLEASE AND THANK YOU. I had to leave at 5pm. That's not a liscense to do whatever you want with a page I deliberately created AFTER posting to the Yew Grove to discuss it, something you obviously haven't bothered yourself with. --TheLastWordSword 15:08, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Css pl0x
This JavaScript code will remove that so redlinks will go directly to the editing screen. Add it to the end of your monaco.js file.

-- 19:16, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

You're here, now go vote
Go vote. Voter apathy is inexcusable! -- 22:10, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will do. -- 22:22, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * This unfortunate fact depresses me. I am six months older than you, and yet you have a much higher edit count and a much better status. -- 22:26, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rofl. I was looking at the 9th most active one initially, trying to find you. I can see that you are very active. And why aren't you fooled by my fake New Message box? <_< Iiii I I I wasn't fooled by it either when I linked it to his talk page. -- 22:32, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. I see. -- 22:41, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * There was a stray f, and it was an eyesore. I decided to remove it. Sorry. -- 23:18, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

How do you resize pictures? The picture on Ket-Zek is too big and I'd like to reduce its size, but I have no idea how to. -- 23:44, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about User:Fruit.Smoothie? Let me guess, it has something to do with RS:DEU? -- 01:40, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. I have no idea about the drama. =/ I'll make a note not to mess with Fruit Smoothie in the future. -- 01:45, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
No rollback allowed here! How dare you!! Anyways, Rollback only for vandalism edits, liquidhelium(or liquid helm as I call him) didn't vandalize, only corrected grammar. 01:29, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * No! You're Rwojy! Rwojy does not misclick! You must be faaakeeee! Lol, misclick is okay I guess, since we all make mistakes, but don't do it again! GRR! :D 01:34, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * It appears you should read this. 01:39, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * User:Fruit.Smoothie‎ (diff; hist) . . (-6) . . Andrew Gower (Talk | contribs | block) (Reverted every single edit by Wojwoj (Talk) in the history of the universe; changed back to last version by Fruit.Smoothie) [ rollback ] -- 01:45, February 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Pfft, When are you experienced, huh? Yea, That's right! I went there, uh huh! 01:52, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * You suck at Grammmmeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrr. 03:01, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * No! It's Grammer! And Idk if I don't sign! Like now! Hmph!
 * Lolololol Wut?! You fail at trolling!


 * No! u phail. I don't wanna feed troll anymore, have some of dem fishies. 03:14, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * What, Yea you troll. You troll, you troll! Troll troll troll. D: 03:18, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, the best of us trolls. 03:22, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * So that means I'm the best?! Yes! And I don't troll! My troll phase is over, but as for you! Rwojy no Trolling, Rwojy no Trolling, Rwojy no TROLLING! 03:26, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

UR BEING STUPID...EVEN THOUGH UR AN ADMIN YOU CAN ADMIT YOU'RE FAULSLY REMOVING TRIVIA FROM THE "BLACK ARM GANG" PAGE FOR NO REASON...NO REASON AT ALL...ITS NOT HURTING ANYONE. tHEN U THREATEN ME WITH UR FANCY PAGE OF RULES? LIKE IM SUPPOSED TO BE SCARED OF THEM? U R     T H E       O N E       D O I N G       W R O N G ! JUST ADMIT IT.!


 * Ignorance is Bliss. And you my friend, are the happiest person on Earth.
 * Don't worry you aren't ignorant :)      You are super ignorant!        07:58, February 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'd like to request a block please. For 6 hours. And I would like the reason to be "Joke". Don't unblock me I want to go to sleep but I can't leave the wiki D: 08:02, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://i593.photobucket.com/albums/tt20/EvaHolopainen/Metaltown2008-66.jpg - Do not tempt the evil genius. As it is all part of his plan. 08:10, February 21, 2010 (UTC)