User talk:Riblet15

Images
Naise pictures. Surprised no one's told you this before. -- 02:11, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. Just in case you didn't know, the only problem with AA images are that they are difficult to add transparency to, otherwise they are very high-quality images (for example, File:Dragon hally.png). Thus, there's no need to tag every anti-aliased image you find with the AA template. Thanks. 13:12, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Was this poorly-done transparency? In any case, I do recall the user who uploaded the dragon halberd image stating that he used the 4x AA settings in-game, and did not apply them afterwards. The quality of the AA images I've seen are quite high, I don't see any flaws with any of them actually, the edges are still sharp and succinct. If I understand correctly, only images will the problems mentioned in Template:AA should be tagged with it. 13:20, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, the flaws you pointed out are quite true. I remember LordNogiet uses the polygonal lasso tool to add transparency to images in Photoshop, but I am unsure of the specifics. If you don't feel that the Template accurately describes the issues with AA images, you could start a discussion at the talkpage, or be bold and make the changes yourself. Something about AA images should probably be added to our image policy as well. 13:41, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything wrong with AA. The transparency only looks bad if you make it bad. For example, File:Untrimrc.png previously looked bad with 4x AA. However, File:Habibah.PNG, File:Meskhenet.PNG, etc. are not as bad. --Coolnesse 21:50, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Help plox
Hey, I've noticed that you edit images quite a lot so could you edit all the images on:

Constructed items (51-74) and Constructed items (75-99)

They need to cropped and all the shadows deleted. Your help will be much appreciated, thanks 12:04, March 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Lol take all the time you need, you've been a great help to the wiki imo. If I have time, I might do them as well 11:49, March 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * The images of the teletabs on page Teletab might need to be updated (not sure if they've been updated) if you're interested =P 19:48, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Images
It was never my intention just to have my char. in the image. We should have HD AA, Transparent, PNG, Cropped equipment images on the wiki. --Coolnesse 22:42, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a quick comment. Your images might come out clearer and brighter if you turned lighting detail to low. This way you won't get shading and shadows on most objects. Its something worth looking into. 22:00, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * But you must. Or you will be banhammered. Its your fault for not reaching into the future and gathering information that had yet to be. 22:11, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * I totally took your advice and reformatted the Images and Media Policy. You shall skim it! And learnmake many ideathinks 03:19, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

your featured image
just to say you missed a spot, could you remove the spot, then you have a perfect image

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100405015737/runescape/images/f/f2/Bones_detail.png

thanks =) -- 16:34, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

btw
btw, graz on getting the strangest featured image ever seen on wiki, lol, it bones, but on wiki you made it amazing, btw, what bones are they? -- 11:26, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Hover text
Well there is no policy but I think it looks better and more professional. For example, seeing "Bones" instead of "File:Bones01.png" looks much better. There is no real reason to revert it. If you really don't like it, just ask others (perhaps in the forums) and if most are against it, I will stop. Thanks, 11:01, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Deletion tags
Just a couple quick things if you will please. One, when tagging for Speedy D you shouldn't really say nominating in the summary, then we think its a discussion. And two, check that all links are going to the new image so it has nothing linking to it anymore. That would be very helpful in the future, thanks man. Cheers,--Degenret01 06:54, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to reiterate, make sure you change all the old image links to the new image links before tagging the image for deletion. Thanks -- 15:52, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * They need to be delinked from all pages, even pages that are not in the mainspace. Thanks- 16:32, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * tell me about it -- 16:36, April 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would say upload them first. I've finally got AWB rigged to replace the links, so if you upload the a new version, I can make the changes quickly and delete the old images. -- 17:23, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Dungeoneering torn pouches
It seems the only use for these things is to make Summoning critters. So I have all the torn pouch pages redirect to the pouch they make, and they should have a section at the bottom with their infobox there. It makes sense as anyone wanting to know about the item will then be able to see everything pertinent all at once, RS:UCS > RS:G. What do you think?Degenret01 06:56, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually the torn pouches are the only item this applies to. They each are used for exactly one particular pouch, and have zero other use besides making that pouch. The branches and the cloths and fish all do several things, just not the torn pouches.Degenret01 07:33, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Dungeoneering ores
I don't understand why you had to replace all the images with PNG files. Due to the automatic blurring on PNG, the icons are now fuzzy.

The 'removing the rock line on each type' was a really good idea though, it looks a lot neater now.

I'll revert them to GIF's unless you have a problem with that.

Kyogron 17:35, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Image replacing
Next time you find yourself in a situation where someone is using an image you need to replace in an untemplated signature, you don't have to replace it individually like that. You can ask an admin to redirect the old image to the new image, or to File:No image.PNG. But if you feel compelled to do so anyways, and I admit I sometimes do, what I like doing is just replacing the signature with the template: Signatures/Blackhole252. I figure if I'm gonna do that I might as well fix it once and for all :P 02:33, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Something else: There is no reason to change inv images to .png, unless there is a noticeable increase in quality. 02:41, April 26, 2010 (UTC)