User talk:C886553

/Archive1/Archive2

Bot
Yay first edit! You're absolutely right that we talk about nothing useful (though we do have meaningful discussions occasionally), but that's what makes it so fun! Also, acorns>grapes. Grapes you have to eat individually. =/ It's slow. I find it funny that your bot made more edits in two hours than you did in ten months. 03:40, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, this isn't my main wiki. See here ;) Ajraddatz Talk 03:47, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rwojy meant the present for me. You don't want it. It will be some bomb/explosive that will kill me. 04:21, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, but I am stealing it :P. I tend to love butting into other people's conversations... Sorry. Ajraddatz Talk 04:22, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re: That recent vandal report...
Sorry about that. I just assumed he might have been upset at the update and was attempting to vandalize that article, but it's obvious that I've jumped to the wrong conclusion without any valid reasoning behind it. Thanks for letting me know about my mistake, and I hope I haven't didn't cause any problems by "jumping the gun" earlier. 04:31, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Archive links
You need links to any/all of your archived talk pages at the top of your talk page, for ref. purposes and such. Thanks.--Degenret01 04:38, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Ajraddatz Talk 04:39, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
I understand your frustrations. I believe the community here is more into manual editing (labour) as compared to Wikipedia, where automated edits rule the day. How I wish there were bots here similar to the ones in Wikipedia. I truly wish that you would try again some other time. And I hope you don't leave the wiki out of frustration... please continue contributing to this wiki. Best wishes. 18:08, March 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * It annoys me as well how this community hates change. We never seem to accept anything new on the terms of "It was working well beforehand". I like many of the things your bot can offer, although it seems the community has no need for them. Thanks for trying. Cheers, 23:19, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
That was my fault for assuming it was vandalism. Usually (98/100) a large decrease in an exchange page is vandalism, so I rollbacked first and didn't notice that my edit added back. 03:33, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I assumed that you did something like that. Don't forget to check next time ;) Ajraddatz Talk 03:35, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Nice to see you back. 22:12, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just doing some bot stuff, actually. This is more about beating User:VegaDark's editcount than being active here again :P Ajraddatz Talk 22:12, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lmao, you already have him beat hands down. 600+ to 21. 22:14, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh no, I'm talking about global edits. I'm a few thousand behind him :/ Ajraddatz Talk 22:15, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's OK, I understand. 22:26, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Trolls are to be ignored
Never ever ever encourage someone to vandalize here. See RS:DFTT. We don't need that crap. Thanks. --Degenret01 23:07, March 18, 2010 (UTC)