User talk:C886553

/Archive

Hello, and welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave me a message. Please note that I will respond to any messages on this page.

Zsfgseg

 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/sandbox to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/sandbox ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/indent to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/indent ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/header to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/header ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Sign to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Sign ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Links to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Links ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Gay to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Gay ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Clippy to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Clippy ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 9 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 9 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 8 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 8 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 7 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 7 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 6 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 6 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 5 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 5 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 4 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 4 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 3 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 3 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 2 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 2 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 12 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 12 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 11 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 11 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 10 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 10 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I/Archive 1 to Talk:ZSFGSEG WAS HERE/Archive 1 ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)
 * 04:15, December 12, 2010 Zsfgseg2 (Talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Iiii I I I to ZSFGSEG WAS HERE ‎ (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL) (revert)

My theory is that Zsfgseg is Jeffwang, because he didn't touch my User:Iiii I I I/Jeffwang16 page. :3 -- 20:36, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * lol, but it isn't. :P 20:39, December 13, 2010 (UTC)

... DUDE. THAT WAS JUST A JOKE MAN!!!! DAMN YOU!!!
 * ...What? 01:34, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * SON I AM DISAPPOINT -- 01:47, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * amg ur mai mumme??? i thot ur 9 02:11, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

One Small Favour
Can you split your archive up into multiple pages? One time I was looking through it, and it managed to lag every single application on my computer. 300+ sections is just too much. If you split your archives, I will give you a cookie. Or not. 01:37, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I like my one huge archive though :3 - And I just had a Lindor chocolate, so noty on the cookie. 01:39, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * One time Chicken's non-archived talk page had 200 sections, then Degen forced him to archive it on the basis that viewing it was enough to crash his computer. If not for the fact that I replaced my computer a few months ago, my old one would have been totally fried by your archive. In peanut oil. Split your archives up or die. 02:25, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did not "force" him, I just told him I would not be able to discuss things with him on his talk page because of the crashing.--Degenret01 07:51, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and if you archive your talk page, I will give you a cake. This is not a lie joke. 02:26, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Checkuser request, Log link
It's broken. It doesn't link to any logs =) 17:30, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * @@@ 17:32, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Does this help? From the Request for custodian link:

[ logs]) 17:36, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Should be working now. That one is just prettier at the markup level. 17:38, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh damn I changed it, you might need to revert it then. *stays away from coding* 17:39, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, it should be fine. 17:40, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Just curious
Do you realize you opposed Caleb based on his being available for only a couple hours a day, yet supported Gaz who often is not around for several days at a time? --Degenret01 07:47, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Gaz is around, though, for almost 6 hours every day. He doesn't edit much during that time, but he is at least available during that time on IRC. 15:38, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
 MERRY CHRISTMAS

03:29, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

RAGE@@
Thanks for blocking that guy. Would you mind semi-protecting my userpage, for autoconfirmed to edit/move only? 20:15, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks much. 20:20, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/04/Pound_layer_cake.jpg

Am I a legit Trekkie or what?
Voice commands turned on and triggered with the keyword "Computer"

andrew > Library > Speech > Speakable Items > Application Speakable Items > Finder > Initiate auto destruct sequence authorization picard four seven alpha tango

Looking at the code for that file..

tell application "Finder" to shut down 20:55, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * lolol 23:06, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * But... does the second officer concur? 23:13, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqe-mr_zBdg#t=03m05s In case you didn't get it. 23:20, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is that real? I can't find it on my Mac :( -- 23:14, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I must admit.. whenever I have my voice commands on I use the keyword "computer" :P 23:15, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * o nvm -- 23:17, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

82.132.248.2xx
Clearly a dynamic IP here. A rangeblock would be so small it would'nt do any harm and this vandal doesnt seem interested in stopping. 01:43, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * We think alike, it seems :) 01:45, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

hi is this u
http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1593/uglywtf.png -- 20:39, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * ya hao u gess 21:02, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Remove block
Joke blocks are a misuse of tools, you sign "I, Name, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realise that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realise that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, Name" at RfA but AndorinKato seems to be immune to that as no action was taken. So, if such things can't be followed, what is so wrong with wanted the misued-tool-block removed? I don't like to have having that there because someone thought they would get a giggle from it. Yes, it will still kind of be there but can be undeleted if ever needed but it will never be needed. If you think it is a misuse of crat tools to remove that, you better go rag on Andorin for having actually misused sysops tools as it is "a serious offence". 22:25, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Get over it, stop wasting my time. Ajraddatz 22:37, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Forum removing comments thing
I figured it was a mistake -- 22:42, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Whoops
Didn't realize there was a VfD for Template:Heated. My bad..just goes to show how informed I am, lol... 22:44, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * You're not active enough@@@22 Ajraddatz 22:46, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * ^lol. -- 23:03, January 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:lol raegquit
no im slepping see http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/1336/catsleepingoncomputersc.jpg -- 00:20, January 18, 2011 (UTC) -- 00:51, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/3711/rageguyu.jpg

HUZZAH
I finally have the proof that I need to silence everyone and install a fascist wiki regime!

9. There are no real rules about moderation either — enjoy your ban.

00:29, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * amg whar did u c tat???/ Ajraddatz 00:31, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * the rules of teh interwebz of course. bow down nao im leedr of wiki kk 00:32, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * k but i wanna be ur wief................. i mean co-dictatr Ajraddatz 00:33, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * kk but first u gota sacrifice ililililili whats his face 2 da underwerld 00:36, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * but he has lawts of eys so he cn c me@@@ Ajraddatz 00:38, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * so poek hiz eyz owt duh lulululul 00:40, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * k imma do tat nao Ajraddatz 00:41, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * trololo 00:42, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * wait wtf -- 00:59, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * um... hai? Ajraddatz 01:00, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Ajrabbitz
January 18, 2011

Dear Mr. Ajrabbitz,

I regret to inform you that your tenure as head rabbit of the wiki has come to an end.

According to the recent referendum on your stay, an overwhelming 98.3% of Wikians supported your removal. 1.6% were neutral, and only 0.1% opposed your removal. Given the results of a democratic election, you will be removed, effective immediately.

With your removal comes the loss of the privileges associated with your post. This means that you will no longer have exclusive access to the head rabbit limousine, and your access to the wiki's carrot horde is officially terminated. You will receive a pension of one (1) carrot semiannually, and will be able to stand within sixty (60) feet of the head rabbit limousine when it passes.

You are required to hand over the office to your successor within two (2) hours. Failure to do so will result in adverse action taken against you. I have commanded the squadron of rabbit bombers to bombard you with their cabbage cannons should you fail to leave.

Sincerely yours,

Liquidhelium

Chairman of the Rabbit Referendum Committee 1 Carrot Way Washington, DC 20008 202-CARROTS (202-227-7687) liquidhelium@rabbit.org

Dear Mr. Helm,

I am of the humble opinion that you put far too much time into the above notice.

Kind regards,

Ajraddatz

Dear Mr. Ajrabbitz,

My records indicate that you have yet to leave office. Unless you do so before 9:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, the board of directors will use force. Since he is highly skilled in the art of cooking, I assure you that you do not want to incur his wrath.

Speaking of which, I am looking forward to some nice rabbit stew today.

Please leave peaceably,

Liquidhelium

Dear Mr. Helm,

As you have yet to discover, I've taken over the wiki and installed a fascist regime. You are hereby ordered to turn over your possessions to me within 48 hours or face execution by firing squad.

Yours Sincerely,

00:57, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Helm,

I'd like to take a moment of your time to second the statement by the inactive noob above. I also happen to be slated as a member of the squad.

Kind regards,

Ajraddatz
 * give me ur office or i keel u k -- 01:00, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Andrew,

You have subverted democracy for a fascist system? Well, here's what I say to that:


 * Give me liberty or give me death!

Yours truly,

Liquidhelium

Dear Mr. Helm

I will gladly oblige your request. Why didn't you ask earlier? Then again, you will regretfully be unable to answer that as you will be dead.

Enjoy,

Ajraddatz

Alright alright, I'll admit I got a bit lazy there. I'll try to avoid it in the future, though it's not exactly a rare occurrence. 03:24, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

So...
Do you wish to tell me how I seem to miss the point you always make in a discussion? Also, would you please clarify to me if your blind or not? I see multiple points of counter-arguing an opposition on your RfAs... 16:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Good morning San Diego
http://i537.photobucket.com/albums/ff331/Soldier_1033/banhammer_forecast.gif

06:01, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Someone spent too much time making that :P Ajraddatz 15:04, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nah found it online l0l 16:50, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Hello i am thinking about joining Runescape wiki. Can I join?

Re: =D
Thanks! It was an amazing trip!! Got back early after a really really long drive, lol. I drove 4530km in a little over 3 days, lol... oh and I only slept once in those 3 days...! 20:35, January 23, 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ajaddatz, i need a good skill to get to 99 in. what do you suggest

Vandals
You're blocking vandals after their first edits? What about warning them first? -- 04:20, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Only in cases of pretty heavy vandalism. Ajraddatz 14:47, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Filter
It's working. I accept payment in the form of $l337 bills. -- 02:57, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I'm not paying you -.- Ajraddatz 04:46, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

hi
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/IM_IN_UR_CHEKUSAH_INVSTIGATIN_UR_SOX_lolcat.jpg

01:54, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * i dnt has any socks i swear Ajraddatz 01:57, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/Lolcat_-_Too_Many_Admins.jpg

02:10, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20051122034552/uncyclopedia/images/e/e1/RonaldMcHitler.jpg Ajraddatz 02:15, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

AHHHHHHHHHHHH
Ajrajrajrajrajrajrajr can u liek tell me teh paeg for teh new dungeon that teh revs are in? I can't find eeet. kthxbai. P.S. HAI 14:53, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * CAEK sorreh i dnt no ;-; Ajraddatz 19:09, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

fffffffuuuuuuuuu
amg how u know i vandle? -- 23:59, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Er:archive time
gtfokthxbai. -- 19:20, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

Bunnies
Make one of your templates again for this please. 03:02, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Forum talk:Yew Grove
Did you read it? I think he was thanking us. He blanked the page but was thanking us. Hardly spam in my opinion. 04:13, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've dealt with cross-wiki spam on Wikia and Wikimedia for over a year now - that is a spambot who most likely hit a few wikis. That is exactly the type of message they leave, and exactly the style in which they do. It even used an edit summary identical to one that I've reverted before. I can say with 100% certainty that that was a spambot. Ajraddatz 04:15, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Google of what he said does show very similar things... nicest spambot I ever met. 04:20, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for helping me so fast, I've turned the rich text thing off now :D

Flour Game
English lingua plumbea est. 18:09, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

warning was invalid...
Please do not incorrectly update the Grand Exchange Market Watch, like you did on the Exchange:Onyxpage. It is considered vandalism

this is what you told me when i changed the price to the CORRECT PRICE... how is that vandalism, when the information i put on, was correct and the one on the runewiki website was wrong...?

i took the price exactly as i was in game about to buy the item.. therefore how could i be committing vandalism..

Messages on my talk page
You have a message on my talk page. Smithing 15:56, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have a question concerning something. I have gathered new information about the above. It appears that the phrase I've reverted several times was added with no consensus (it was added when RS:CONSENSUS was not on this Wikia at all, and there's no discussion anywhere about it). Shouldn't consensus be required if this phrase were to be added again, as it is relatively minor and not really policy? There was no consensus to add the phrase, and no-one's thinks the removal of this phrase will affect this Wikia at all. I will not be reverting the page for at least one week if need be. Thanks, Smithing 00:36, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * tbh I'd remove the sentence myself, and I have contacted Evil1888 - he shouldn't be reverting either. Ajraddatz 00:38, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

Please note that I will respond to any messages on this page.
Nao u has to 00:31, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * k(???) Ajraddatz 01:10, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Yay
Lol, thanks. I've stopped doing those blank undos, btw. >.> 03:51, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * -.- 03:53, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * You're probably about the only one who doesn't do it though. 03:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol. Just to see what would happen? 03:59, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Some people might just like opposing for the sake of doing so. But I wouldn't have commented no matter what was being said :P I've seen many RFAs go down that way. 04:05, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, well at least I won't have to have people examining my contributions so closely and commenting about them again. 04:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, good night. 04:14, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Re
I'm not being rude, Cook, Sytgmata, and Cakemix are being rude to me, and I politely asked Cakemix and Stygmata not to post on my talk page again, and am in the process of asking Cook to stop stalking EVERY SINGLE ONE OF MY EDITS, and to not post on my page again. So, if you're going to talk to someone about being rude, talk to them, because Cook doesn't deserve Sysop in my opinion.

20:24, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

AWB
Yes, I could do that. What exactly do you need? 00:25, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * On Brickipedia, I need on every page that does not already have  on it. Is that possible?  04:07, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

White Space on profile
Can u tell more on my marks for excessive white space on my profile and tell how i can fix this

00:59, March 27, 2011 (UTC)

12358132134
if you dont no what that is, i keel u k. also go reed my brillian prose on lhs page. i can do some for you too 00:56, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Jack Spiral
Don't worry, I already closed the blasphemous thread and it's archived now. Those silly Rebels, they do not know the power of the Green Side of the Wiki. SYSOP POWER! 03:57, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

indef block on proxies
Sorry for being the ignorant guy, but do you think you could explain on the policy page why they need to be indef blocked? Can't this hurt good contributors?--Degenret01 05:32, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

wat
wai 16:26, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * well as u no i has lots of problemblemblemblemseseseseseseseseseseses so ya 16:29, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * wat 16:32, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Reverted vandalism
Please fix the entire runescape wikia.... idk who messed it up but someone vandalized the entire front page pluss added small things in different sections
 * lol 02:39, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

gf
	Blacklist! User:Ajraddatz edited Forum:Getting more active editors (+325) Diff: http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?diff=4106528&oldid=4106514 "/* Discussion */ "

I knew you'd finally join me in vandling. Now together we can vandle the wiki!@@ -- 15:03, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * i just luf vandling i do it all teh tiem@@ 15:05, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sysop userbox
[http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=User:Liquidhelium/Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=3351822 You're not very observant, are you? The box has been gone for almost six months.] And then I decided it would be funny if a sysop lied about it and later nuked the page when I thought it was getting too long. Now my page is dedicated to reminding you that I own you in RS. 00:41, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bah, I thought I saw it a month ago or so. Oh well, I believe that it was previously established that I am a noob :p 00:42, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, to be fair, you do get points for not being auto-opped in irc channel 00:43, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've made my share of accidental operator "incidents" in the IRC. I figure it's best to cut down on that. I think the one you saw was probably the fake sysop box, which I added as a joke. 00:44, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Achievements
http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/7872/ihugthatfeel.png

It's really annoying that they don't even agree with a trial... But heck, maybe the thread will pass this time. 18:21, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Achievements extension thread
Regarding the Achievements extension trial thread, I honestly cannot recall a request for adminship where you "used to oppose an RfA to try and get a reaction out of the person" in relation to undoing edits or reverting. I didn't mean to slight you with the comment on undoing and reverting, just that I took Degens comment of players stating "Fucking Wiki, every time you make a change some asshole comes along and undoes it. Fuck them.," and believed that getting awarded and then having your edit that you recieved the badge for like dust in the wind.

Maybe I am stretching at things that don't belong. However I do support using the extension, regardless of how many times I click the Save page button a week or month. I am biased on the issue, I understood this when I had commented on the first two week trial thread last August. More people are supporting it this time around, albeit with a whole lot less opposition to the idea as well. In my opinion, reverting an edit by someone who just got the badge for said edit may feel cheated with the accumulated points thus far. My few cents on the subject, wishing to not edit the thread again. Sorry, 04:49, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

u is vandle
vandlevandlevandlevandlevandle luv, ur sekrit admirererer
 * wat???????? hao u no it was me???? i is sekrit person so u cant no it is me 15:07, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

So badges failed
I do not know how knowledgeable you are but I do have an idea if you can pull this off. Make up wikicapes for things the badges would have done, find a way to be notified when people hit those milestones, and start awarding them. For the first month there should not be so many as to be a time killer, after that others hopefully will join in with you. You could make a team of those who supported your thread. In 60-90 days the whole wiki will see how well it works and then you can re-propose the extension, with facts to back you up. If it works. --Degenret01 04:09, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Not only would that be rather difficult, and I don't have that sort of time, but there is absolutely no way that that would either be a good use of time, or show any facts about the use of the extension. I already have lots of supporting evidence showing that it works - or are people unable to read the numbers provided at these two sites? And honestly, at the end of the day, I don't care. If people don't want an active wiki, that is fine by me - but at least I will be able to sleep at night know that I tried to fix it. 04:29, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Constructive Criticism
If you have a problem with Halo, then click here. If anyone asks, it was a misclick. 01:45, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

See how easy it is to whore the achievement system?
I just got 10 points :P 17:48, April 13, 2011 (UTC)