User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five (5 and 6 cross some)
 * Six
 * Known I.P.s I have had. Special:Contributions/216.136.67.224

Look, I have already been spammed. SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM

First!
Sorry, couldn't resist. 01:52, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * THANKYOUFORYOURKINDWORDSOFENCOURAGEMENT. (MYCAPSLOCKANDSPACEBARAREINFACTBROKEN)  14:08, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Parsonsda
I don't mind the work. I figure if you can block someone without enough certainty that you can type up 9001 paragraphs justifying it, then you shouldn't have blocked them in the first place. I still find it pretty annoying that this whole process seems to have been derailed by three letters which were probably an arbitrary choice in the original IMP. I didn't figure that anyone would make that hard-line distinction, since it doesn't make logical sense in context. That said, I also realise that I can't use what I find logical to block people, when a policy does explicitly, if not intentionally, state differently. Given this loophole, I can see no recourse than to unblock him, despite the fact that I know at no point did he read the IMP and think "hey, this only says fansites. guess youtube videos are ok!" I know he either just forgot, or didn't think he would face consequences again. 20:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE:AGF
Kk, won't happen again ;)

22:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

cvu
I'm going to be off for 1:30h, so I can't antivandalise, so please block the vandals at RuneScape:Counter-Vandalism_Unit asap. Thanks, 13:16, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:gilded pickaxe
If your inteligence isn't high enough to know the image is kept on a cache and you can upload a separete file named "Guilded Dragon Pickaxe Equipped, then don't even bother to annoy me with a trivial argument 21:53, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

^^^^^ Lol, fail spelling 19:35, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Monkeys
Gj on the monkeys, they look very nice ^-^ 22:26, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol ^-^ 22:41, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hats off to you sir. Now get your ass to work on vultures. 05:31, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * What is this, the whinescape wiki? Nut up and get back to work. 07:00, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

NEW IDEA
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100620065358/runescape/images/d/d5/Grimy_avantoe.png -> http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100620070247/runescape/images/2/2b/Clean_avantoe.png + http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100610075102/runescape/images/6/66/Vial_of_water.png = http://images.wikia.com/runescape/images/c/cb/Unfinished_avantoe_potion.png + http://images.wikia.com/runescape/images/9/96/Snape_grass1.PNG = http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100924013854/runescape/images/c/cb/Fishing_potion.PNG

something like this? :D

it may have been done before idk :O 05:29, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Template:Signatures/Degenret01
Will you please let stay on that signatures page? It allows the page to be categorized as a signature, which it technically is. It also removes the page from Special:UncategorizedTemplates. 21:59, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you can explain how it bogs down servers or causes glitches or problems with the wiki, then I will say yes. But off hand I see no way in which having no pages appear on the uncategorized template page benefit us. I just really detest labels.--Degenret01 00:15, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

My ball!

 * http://www.studio7photography.co.nz/store/DIO2011/IMG_7155.JPG
 * http://www.studio7photography.co.nz/store/DIO2011/IMG_7218.JPG

Objection!
That's Harry Reid, Senate Majority leader from Nevada. 18:21, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

:D
http://www.famine.org.nz/courtneygill

Vandelizm
Hai, dun remuv or add dumb stuff to teh wiki plz. It caled vandelzm. If yud like to try out somefin, use teh snadbox. Kthx  04:41, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

RE:protection
I protected the page because I felt overwhelmed trying to revert the page back to a good version as a user who kept changing his IP kept vandalising it, perhaps a day was a little long I admit, also I hadn't seen many cv users or sysops editing and I was thinking of going to go eat something. 15:36, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your feedback, I was just telling you why I did what I did. 15:42, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

You dun goof'd
consequences will never be the same 17:30, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Umm
These people were kind of relying on that image you just deleted. /: 18:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * And this guy 18:42, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * ^ Lol. Degen - in most instances I'd agree, but this one was confirmed to come out in July by some random J-mod on facebook. If this is indeed false (which it is, as the picture proved), then we need to confirm that it was. 18:47, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re: transparency
Sorry, I had thought I put it in the page. Anyway, it's there now. 08:21, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, Degenerate. Really helpful!:)
 * ~`RuneScape Trivia Champion`~* 11:19, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

re:yes
ohhh thanks for telling me! I'll update every page stating otherwise now! 12:25, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Moneyz
My vanity and pride would never allow me to accept some sort of monetary reward, especially for something as trivial as sharing information. However, I would be more than happy to accept a small donation towards the next ET event with prizes ^_^? Assuming ofcourse that the offer still stands. - 16:50, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * User:Pharos 5/Lending - 10:08, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

RE:blocking
Alright, I'll be nicer in future. If you had a problem with it, might have been better to bring it up earlier, perhaps less than a fortnight afterwards; I had basically forgotten all about it... Also, there's no need to be pissed off over something like that. 09:31, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

RE:'File:Forum quote.png' deletion
The purpose of that image was to demonstrate the quoting facility (though it also doubled as an explanation). If you think that is unnecessary however, then that's ok. I just wanted to point that out ;) Sundays211 08:37, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:historical images
RuneScape:Orphanage/Historical - That page? 15:57, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Degen
Just wanted to thank you for your help in the past. Have not seen you on RS when I am on lately. The time I tried to answer your message, I had trouble posting it. So here it goes again. One more try. =) *** edit - Wow it worked! Don't be a stranger. Hope all is well.

Take Care,

Aryanna45 06:15, June 18, 2011 (UTC)Aryanna45

RE:86.175.81.246
Yes, I'm aware it's not for mistakes. Just made a bad judgement. My bad. Smithing (talk | contribs) 19:18, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Re:
Still no 4x AA >:( -- 08:15, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * You army people never give up >:3 -- 11:30, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Note
It's alright. You made a legitimate point that I did not realize. Your reopening is perfectly valid. 13:25, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

TROLOLOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvg2h7aITtM

01:19, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

RE:NPOV
Ooh. I'll be sure to check then, hehe  21:34, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Document
Sorry if I gave the impression that you would be receiving it soon -- the contest does not end for another 43 hours. 04:14, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Results are on the page, you can add them to the community page if you want. 20:27, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

re
Oh, sorry that was just me getting me getting revenge, won't do it again. 04:13, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

re
Hm? Where did I mess up, I usually get that >_>. 00:11, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Waaaiit, that wasn't me, lol, pretty sure that was Tilburys. He's pretty good about it too, dw. 00:20, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Scoring
Okay, thank you. 04:50, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

re:Countervandalism intro
It is made with JavaScript, with User:Suppa chuppa/cvu.js imported into MediaWiki:Common.js to change the header into the report script. If you want to change something to it, but don't know how to do it, you could always ask suppa to change it. 09:11, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'm kind of busy right now, so I'll change that when I can. 08:39, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I made the changes. If it doesn't show up correctly, try refreshing your cache and it should work. 08:19, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

DEU
10:31, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * What a terrible idea. You're gaming the system to dismiss bits of policy that don't fit your liking because they don't have consensus to go along with them. If we were to remove all the parts of policies that were added with no discussion, we would be left with barely anything. It was added nearly three years ago and has caused no problems up until this point. Silence implies consent, and three years of silence on something like this shows that it is ingrained in our culture and is policy. I don't know if it's some libertarian tendency that makes you want no one to edit for maintenance reasons, but it's completely ridiculous. 10:47, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

RE:
I agree, if I had clicked undo instead of misclicking rollback. It's annoying that they are directly under each other. 11:37, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

My sig
Hrm, really? I just left it, even though it wasn't working in Chrome. Thanks!

Re: Growth cycles
It's actually more than just paying the farmer vs. checking yourself. It's also a matter of what the correct information is. For example, do fruit trees grow in 960 minutes or 880 minutes? 6 cycles of 160 minutes is 960 minutes. 880 minutes cannot be substantiated at all. In addition, knowing the length of the individual cycles allows players to know the exact time (or within a 5 minute offset) when the crops are grown, since cycles start and end times are fixed and are not relative to when you plant. -- 16:16, July 29, 2011 (UTC)