User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

My previous talk is now archived. For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four

Chaos rapier image
I'm sure you were expecting someone to complain about the image, but I bet you weren't expecting that person to be me! Now, I agree that the costume is stupid and flashy and needs to go away, and ordinarily I'd be fine reverting to a lower-quality image, but I feel that the only other we have is just too much of a dive in quality. As much as I hate that type of vainglory, I think the Snorks-esque image is the better one. 07:18, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * You own a chaotic rapier? If so, you might be able to take a better picture if you zoomed with your browser. If you use firefox, this is "ctrl +". But make sure you click outside of the runescape window, like on the gray header bar, before you press ctrl +. You can also go to View->Zoom->Zoom in. Just sayin' is all >_> 08:14, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Or the equip screen, which the fact that you didn't use likely means that you do not own one, which means that you can disregard the advice I posted :P 08:16, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Help me talk page stalkers
My sons laptop won't connect to the internet and I don't know why. It is a HP g60 with Windows vista. Neither wireless nor a wire will work. Any ideas how to proceed? Thanks.--Degenret01 22:16, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ohderlawd! Try downloading drivers for the modem and wireless card that comes with it. Check the device manager (under the network adapters category) to see what he has, then look for drivers for those models. 23:57, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
Hello, I was just wondering if you would be OK with having a link to your email on RuneScape:Administrators. You don't need to provide your email address, as it will be linked to through Special:Emailuser. Please respond on my talk page. Thanks! 20:18, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Minning glitch.jpg
I was gonna use it. D: --Coolnesse 02:17, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

You're gonna love this!
Given your comments in Forum:I was permanentley banned apparently?, I felt that showing you this would be in good taste. 23:57, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re:nom for adminship
Runescape:Requests for adminship said to let them know they had been nominated. 07:52, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

A modest signature for you
 Ghosty Degen  →→  ←←  Read the hover text nubs  08:50, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

DAP
Hey mate, your section of the D.A. Project will be opened next week. However, after seeing the relative success of the other sections which are more article formatted I believe a slight bit of uniformity in style would be beneficial. Basically, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to make your section look more like the others, other than that the content is great.-- 17:08, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:wow
What Chicken said, plus if he fires back, we get to block him for longer. Win-win. -- 03:44, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of his conduct, in fact I was the first user to warn him about his incivility. This is his first full-fledged block, as you removed his first one prior to it expiring. Give some time to see how he reacts to this. -- 03:58, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

you edit power count level
it's over 9000... 09:28, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * must resist urge to edit, still not level 99 farmaritaville. besides i mustn't edit lest i might accidentally let Iiii I I I think i actually am a wikiholic...  09:46, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Please
Which one are you talking about in particular. Because usually I only request closure to older threads. 06:48, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:No fear mongering on the Yew Grove please
Maybe I shouldn't have stated that comment in that particular place, but it was on-topic. Composite was describing (dairly aggressively) how he sees our community and policies, and although I don't see it as aggressively and "desperately" as he does, I somewhat do share it. It is not "rumour-spreading". Everyone knows that people leave eventually, because they have other commitments in their life. But that should be the only reason. You too would know that users, especially experienced ones, are leaving/have left because of the way things are today. But I apologise; I shouldn't have brought up such a point in that particular place. 13:47, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Signature Edit
I saw where you edited my signature, and not that I mind but, when I set it up I set it up according to the max height rules set down on this page, where it says in bullet number 4 the max height is 40px, not 28. So if the max height is really 28, that page needs some updating. 17:24, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, lol. Okay. 21:51, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've made a modification to the max size value. See, the biggest inventory sprite image there is would be 34px high. I think we can both agree that no inventory image is too tall for the purpose of signatures, so it makes sense that the max size should be 35px (because 34 is a prime number! no one likes those). Do you agree, sir? 04:09, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * But 34 isn't a prime number.  09:57, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I like prime numbers. They are like me, nothing can get into it. Ummm, seriously though, I did not realize that inventory images all fit into a single line of text. If it doesn't make the page lines uneven in spacing, thats all I care about.--Degenret01 04:20, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can fix it without shrinking inventory images (which makes them look really ugly) by adding "vertical-align:3px" or whatever to the opening span tag of a signature. That shifts the whole thing down so any uneven spacing it would create is shifted to the space between his last line and the start of the next line, where it doesn't matter an din fact helps a little. 02:24, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * If people can't be bothered to make their sigs look proper they deserve for it to be all ugly and whatnot.--Degenret01 02:28, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, sir. *adds blinking and gifs and white-on-white text to his signature* 02:29, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * You wouldn't be the first to have that sig --Degenret01 03:35, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:btw
Heh, thanks :) 02:04, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:proquester
Almost certainly the same person as Special:Contributions/24.179.110.90, who was adding the same thing a few minutes ago. 06:34, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Arguing I'd rather call it "debating" with trolls
I really don't think that was an "argument", more like an "endless debate". Also, for a troll, he is being relatively civil this time. Don't worry, I just finished presenting all my rational arguments. He can keep ranting to a closed door if he so wishes. And finally, cheers  08:52, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Sandbox
Alright, if you take offense at that, sorry. I'll change the description. I created the description after I came up with names for the list, and the description is meant to be my view that many of the changes are unnecessary. 01:45, August 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Whiny liberal! *rimshot* 01:47, August 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, the reason I put you in the liberals category has nothing to do with your edits on the wiki. That description was intended for Chicken, who has in fact made several of that type of edits. I classified you as liberal because you are an outspoken critic of George Bush, and I cannot fathom how a conservative can be that fervent in his criticism of Bush. 01:54, August 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Excuse me for jumping in here, but there were—and are—conservatives who were critical of Bush and his policies. (Andrew Sullivan is a prominent one.) Please don't automatically link the ability to think for one's self with liberalism or see it as anti-conservative. (Although I'm sure liberals would find the connection flattering.) While Degen has never told me his political views, I don't think he should be lumped in with one group or the other just because he is willing to speak his own thoughts and not walk lockstep with others. 12:25, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Really.
Talk about RS:UTP violations. I'm just pointing out that you are using policy incorrectly, and creating a hostile environment by doing so. I wasn't trying to tell you not to be offended, I was suggesting that you handle yourself in a more mature way. Telling me to kiss your ass was, again, the wrong way to handle things. People aren't always going to do things your way. Deal with it. -- 01:55, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mocking and insulting others created the hostile environment, not my response to it. Don't go around thinking it is okay for someone to call people whatever names they want and then be surprised that they react to it.-- 06:34, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * No one insulted you. You need to get over yourself. . -- 21:18, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can stop insulting me anytime. If you do not want me to respond then stop flaming me -- 00:59, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

trolololololololled!
 Degenret01  Ask an admin!

I hope u liek. 06:21, August 13, 2010 (UTC) -- 06:32, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Prayer information

 * 1) Made a super prayer potion
 * 2) Drained my prayer down to 0 / 88
 * 3) Drank the super prayer potion
 * 4) I have 37 prayer points out of a possible 88 01:47, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Political ideology
It seems we are in the same category. 12:52, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Fest Mod
Hey Degen, remember the Wikifest discussion we had on Friday? You mentioned that this is currently the weekend where you get a break, and if I calculated correctly, the next one will be on the 4 September weekend, which coincidentally happens to be the date of the Wikifest. Is it then possible for you to moderate the Fest, or would you rather sleep in? 13:34, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re:npov
Huh...? Why do you tell me that all of a sudden? 13:46, August 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * That is neutral, isn't it? 11:44, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Ummm... What?!
As stated in RS:CONSENSUS " Only administrators may close discussions, although all users are welcome to request closure, if they believe one or more of the above has occurred. Other users may support, oppose or comment on the closure, and an administrator will eventually decide on what action to take, using the above guidelines." 01:17, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Your signature
Why the change? I thought you never used custom signatures. And the link to your talk page really isn't reminiscent of your character. 01:36, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * My sig is poking fun at crowns and the idea that sysops are better than others. And what link to talk page? It only links to my user page.-- 01:43, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, then I totally agree with you. When I first saw it, I was like WTF? Is this really Degen's doing? And the "Ask an admin! We know more!" part links to your talk page. 01:45, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can't click it here, since we're already on your talk page. Go to your sig template to see what I'm talking about. 01:46, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I was totally "wtf is he talkin' 'bout?"-- 01:51, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. It is temporary, I will switch to a diff sig in a few days (scroll up my talk page to see it)-- 01:53, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice sig :) 03:10, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Bad ass sig. 04:09, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * WE should make a tv show called "Pimp Yo' Sig" 09:12, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

I rofl'd. 13:58, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

I was truly and utterly confused upon first sight.
 * Then I lol'd.
 * Then I agreed with Swizzl3. Pimp Yo' Sig FTW!     21:15, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

RE:silver dyed
File:Dyedsilverset.png. But why do you you ask, your an admin, you know more. 01:38, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, then its File:Dyedsilversetarmour.png, and about the rfa... didn't realise it ended, and i'm not disappointed, not the end of the world (for a least 2 more years). After the 4th day of full blown opposes, I did not even try to imagine it magically turning around, and it's not like because it failed I'll be demoted or anything. Also I was talking about your sig, and I submit to your superb knowledge and skill.  02:21, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Improving Inter-fansite Communication
Hey, I have noticed the above thread has been stagnant for a while and I was wondering what consensus (if any) you see in this thread. No consensus? Rough consensus for the idea but not the implementation? Thanks, 10:39, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, about the Hide 'n Seek events, what is the typical number of hiders that we have? 11:29, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't realise I left the message on your talkpage, I thought it was Stelercus's. But anyway, thanks, that's a pretty good amount. 13:12, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

RE:talkie person
Of course, it's fine. Y'know, it takes real skill to organise things like this. One day you'll grow up and be like me, your hero. 13:08, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Noway, I don't speak with Powers, he's a botter. Also, I'm the one who called you a "nooooob" yesterday. Also, am I supposed to use that page like admin requests? They ask me to do something and speak to someone and I do it? 13:16, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * You so wise. 13:22, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've sent links to the site admin of RHQ to the forums and the inter fansite comm. 14:20, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: drop tables
How do I do that? And thanks for blocking the guy who keeps blanking my userpage :) 21:10, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape:Inter-fansite communication
I have remodelled the page slightly, just adding more headers and making look better. Cheers, 06:28, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh? I thought up the idea. But never mind, there nothing on right now. Exactly what is the evaluation process going to be? We haven't decided on that yet have we. 06:34, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm confused. "not approved not be one of the members", what on Earth does that mean? 06:35, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Some more questions - Who established RS:IFC? Me, as I made the idea, or you, as you created the page. 09:05, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Your signature
User:Azaz129/Defining administrators/Perception and RS:AEAE User:Azaz129/Defining administrators/Perception and RS:AEAE 06:53, August 19, 2010 (UTC)