User talk:Suppa chuppa

Welcome!
You said, "The most commonly accepted use of nested quotes is to alternate between " and '". Proof? Sources? And, they do not alternate correctly in your edit... Prgmbeta 00:09, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. Prgmbeta 00:26, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Then when was their release date?
 * They were released when membership came out, on 27 February 2002 with the update "Latest RuneScape News (27 February 2002)" 03:58, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Lolwtf
lolwtf? 03:45, May 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * You have a poltergeist! 03:54, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

See my talk-page.
I have my explaination for creating that category. BlazeTheMovieFan 04:08, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your edit.
On the Dragon platebody trivia section you modified the trivia to add "for a platebody". Let me ask, what item has more high alchemy value than a dragon platebody? Because I didn't find any, not one. BlazeTheMovieFan 21:17, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

O_o
Would you believe 90% sure? Ajraddatz Talk 21:26, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Hey heads up, next time you edit a lot of articles like you just did, which is fine, you might want to check the minor edit button so we are not flooded on the recent changes page. :) -- 01:50, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, oops. I thought I had done that. Sorry. 01:52, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol thanks :) -- 01:53, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Capitalization
Ok. 03:33, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
You now have the rollback tool, please be sure to only use it in cases of obvious vandalism as it does not provide an adequate summary for good faith edits, happy editing.-- 19:05, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Expression
Added a little more than I said (forgot about the second ). Here it is  then replace it with. Thank you so very much for your help! 05:51, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Explorer's ring
Isn't it Explorer's ring in game, not Ring? 21:30, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, and we do things based off in game.  21:32, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, I didn't move the individual articles though. I moved the one talking about the general term for them. It's not that big of a deal though. If you want you could very well move it back. 21:33, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Remember RS:AGF
Just wanted to remind you of RS:AGF. Referring to this rollback: http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=Lensa&diff=2824370&oldid=2824367, there was no need to rollback as it was not an obvious case of vandalism, a simple undo and test edit 1 warning would of been the correct choice. 19:03, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Move
-- 17:10, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm stupid. :\ -- 17:12, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Adv. Log on Userpage
Hey Suppa chuppa, I noticed you have a table filled with Adventure log info, I was wondering if I could use that for my Userpage if you weren't offended or anything :D? 05:33, July 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes I do, thank you :) 05:46, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Win
Its more fun than typing subst:Warn3  08:05, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

I'm sortta confused...
This is a response to the message I got saying:

"Please do not remove content from, add nonsense to, or add otherwise disruptive material to RuneScape Wiki pages, as you did to the article [|King Black Dragon]. Doing so is considered vandalism. If you have been or are doing this, please stop and try to make useful contributions or you will be blocked. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you and happy contributing."

I'm not really sure what's so wrong about stating a nickname the clan uses to refer to the KBD... Could you explain in more detail what the problem is?

RE:Transcluding
thanks! 08:50, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE: GEMW
Thanks, I will take a look at those. -- 23:28, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Where to report Bugs?
I found a bug how on my User Page I can see my 'follower pages' message that says I have none over/under-lap my text on the User Page. Another user I saw also had this happen. Any ideas? Smileydiley 08:33, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

i lol'd
Better luck next time. 08:56, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Improving Inter-fansite Communication
A changed proposal has been submitted, you may wish to reconsider you stance on this issue. Thanks 04:40, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

200m experience points
I don't understand why you reverted my edits back to the previous edit. All I did was clean up and reformat the section. I added NOTHING new and deleted NOTHING there. But you reverted the edits with "Not necessarily true" as your reason. If something is not true, then FIX it, don't revert an to older edit that does NOTHING to fix the perceived problem.

Go look at what you did. The section was a MESS before I cleaned it up. Now it is a mess AGAIN. 06:39, July 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay. I see your point with the totals.  Easy to fix, just default the total and nothing will show for a total.


 * As for the rest, most of what you say is in the eye of the beholder, in which case your views should have gone to a discussion of the changes to get a CONSENSUS from the wiki community. In any event, the reversion should NOT have happened without a consensus from the community.  If the community agreed with you, I would not have ANY problem with the reversion at all.  But I DO have a problem people making heavy-handed reverts when they assume that they know what the community likes and/or wants.


 * My only goal was to fix obvious problems with the section. Changing the box was just a cosmetic change which I believed helped the section.  Your point about the totals did not even hit my radar until you pointed it out to me.  Since you have reverted it, I will leave it as is.  Someone else can fix it now.  I see no point in wasting my time fixing things and have them reverted wholesale by someone who thinks they know everything.  End of story.  07:06, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Your edit to ankou (death rune drop)
I noticed that you took out the parenthetical "dropped only on members' worlds" notation by death runes in the ankou article. I know that it seems redundant with the "(m)" (okay, it is redundant), but it was added because there is some long-standing confusion over this, since the runes themselves are available on free servers, but ankou only drop them on p2p worlds. See the Talk page for one example. If you look back through the article history, you will see that the "(m)" has been removed and added multiple times, as I recall. The parenthetical statement, while it shouldn't be necessary, was an attempt to clarify and avoid another round of circular edits. (I may have added it myself this last time, I can't recall.) I'm not adding it back - but I'm willing to take bets on how long the "(m)" stays on the article, or someone posts the question again.... Happy editing. JalYt-Mej-Wynde 15:31, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha! It lasted less than 3.5 days - edited out early on 24 July. I'm putting it back the way you had it (and same for ess & pure ess) - which I agree is the best technically, even though, as you see, it causes confusion - and will restore it again in a few days when some well-meaning editor changes it again. JalYt-Mej-Wynde 14:42, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

help
dude im stuck in elemental workshop III maybe you could help me solve my problem with the LONG puzzle

instead of using quickchat lets use this wiki

RE:Summoning
I changed it because if a user didn't know what conjuration ment, and they saw "Wikipedia also has an article about Conjuration" they'd probably get confused and think it had nothing to do with Summoning. And besides, Summoning redirects to conjuration. 03:51, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't know what it meant before I clicked on the link. 03:55, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I guess I did. 04:00, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

CVU
Hi Suppa! I was having a lil' trouble with the editing thing. I'm not the best at it yet but thank you for the help ^_^ Teh Chicken 18:23, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Sig help
The sig must be to long because the whole text will not fit into the box :\ -Finch Claw

RE:Welcome
Thanks for the greeting :)

MEEP 02:16, August 13, 2010 (UTC)MEEP

Re:omg fail
Idunnevenknow ! 19:18, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Vote
Thank you very much for your vote, it really does mean a lot  08:29, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape:Requests for deletion/RuneScape:Chat/QDB
I would like to inform you that I amended my proposal from an archiving of the page to the full deletion of the page. I hope you will continue to support it, but I certainly understand if you decide to change your position. 02:40, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

editing vs undo
when you wish to change information editing is the prefered way to achieve this.... if what you change is everything added then editing is prefered as it increases the information

an undo removes all information added and gives nothing so unless it was a graffiti edit, changing wrong or misleading info is better than just deleting all info

an undo is only appropriate when EVERY LAST BIT of info needs to be removed

and never answer a question by undoing the question... the answer is geaffiti without the question

Qazwiz 20:26, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

CVU move
We're discussing it at Forum:Counter Vandalism Unit. 03:07, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
What does  do? 09:20, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. 02:38, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

crucially
He is wikia staff. Long story short, something on tluls page was damaging the servers, and he blanked it to stop it. 06:07, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * You didn't do anything wrong, there was no way you coulda known what was happening, so it's really no ones fault, except for that nub who can't code properly. 06:24, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Crucially and my userpage
Crucially had my permission to blank the page, as it was crashing Wikia's servers (don't ask me how, I'm not sure).

U:M2602
OOPS! I DIDN'T KNOW THAT DISCUSSION WAS THERE! HEHEH... 07:19, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow it still hasn't been deleted. Wanna join mine and Murd3rlogist's mutiny? 10:52, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Join so your ready for next time! 22:29, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Arrr...
Ahoy ,

http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/matthew2602/pirate.png

HAPPY

INTERNATIONAL

TALK

LIKE

A

PIRATE

DAY

FROM MATTHEW2602

22:44, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Z-buffering
Of course Z-buffering is a name, or else what would it be? An action? TROFL would you like it to be z-Buferring? Btw I "Google'd" Z-buffering and in fact both the "Z" and the "B" where uppercase, good fight to you, sir.

AKA it is the NAME giving to the algorithm that processes(?) the depth of and object and accurately draws it. Wiki it, Google it, your argument is rendered invalid. ScionCrush 05:14, September 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Alas, if you lost the argument doesn't means its stupid, I said that the "B" being capitalized was just to mock, and btw, I just Google'd "z-buffering" and it autocapitalized, with only one exception in the results page with a "Z" not capitalized. ScionCrush 05:27, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * The fact that you're using defensive language and using the diminutive "little" to give less importance to the argument (wich you lost), and where are you coming from? Randomly saying "z0mgof i has gogli cerch and i c dat z aint no be capitaliesed!!11!!1!!", tbh idk because when you point it out it seem that Z-buffering are a random cluster of words wich follow no rule know to you, 'tis a name and as such requires to follow the "Upper letter" rule. ScionCrush 05:40, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, I have been proved wrong by the might know-it-all Wikipedia, and not you because you were trying to prove me what the "Z" stand for ROFL, nevertheless you can proceed with my blessing, brother. ScionCrush 05:50, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Summoning obelisk
Hi, I see you recently put the content of Summoning Obelisk onto the Summoning obelisk page. There is nothing wrong with that; however, in the future, instead of copying and pasting the page contents, could you please use the move button? Moving the page has the benefit of moving the history also, so anyone that wants to look back through the history for whatever reason can do so easily. Thanks! 18:26, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's fine; don't worry. I'm not quite sure why sometimes nonsysops can move pages over redirects, while other times they cannot. At any rate, chances are someone's going to notice as he or she clears the double redirects list like I was doing for summoning obelisk.  18:36, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

lulz

RE:Update
Uhm, thanks, I guess. I currently cannot tell if you're being sarcastic or serious. 01:36, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, then you're quite welcome.  01:38, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

:/
You stole my undo :c -- 17:56, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

About the 2010 Halloween event glitch thingymabob
On RS:TRIVIA, it reads at the very bottom that "Bugs/glitches should not be mentioned in trivia." That in itself is thrown out of context a little bit, as it reads afterwards "They should have their own Bugs/glitches sub-section...", but is the carrot glitch linked to the Halloween event? If it wasn't or if it's unsure, it would be on the Glitches page, right?

But on the Glitches page it reads "Do not list any glitches that allow players to gain any unfair advantage if those glitches have not been fixed yet."

When I originally removed it, I was acting from that statement above, which wouldn't really be any grounds to stand on since it's on another page entirely. But I really, really don't think that an unfixed bug should just be listed in the mainspace like that. I would support putting it back after it was apparently resolved, but not while it can still be abused... Eevables 01:36, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

AWB
If you are using the AWB for your edits, you need to be on a bot account. 17:38, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I recommend you use the AWB :) 17:42, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * There are many editors who are very good with the AWB. They will be able to instruct you. I can use it, but I don't know much :) 17:44, October 22, 2010 (UTC)