User talk:Agamemnus

Summer's End Edits
I like what you've been doing with Summers End. Just small edits but its all important in the end!

Royboo 04:03, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

RE: I see what you did there
It's a common practice to remove or edit out usernames in images. Why does this phase you so? Star Find 18:26, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Regardless.. it shows my username, and I'd rather like to be seen as a mere editor of the Wiki, rather than someone who tries to put up images with their username in it just to get attention. Star Find 22:10, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Need your opinion. You can ignore this now. It's been resolved.
This is my edit on the style guide:

"Those rookie editors made the mistake of writing 'should of' when they meant 'should have.'"

It was originally written by me as "Those rookie editors made the mistake of writing "should of" when they meant 'should have.'"

Notice the regular quotes ( " ) around the should of part.

The entire quote is in quotes. Nested quotes (quotes inside the whole quote) look like this: '

Suppa chuppa reverted my edit, saying "The most commonly accepted use of nested quotes is to alternate between " and '". I think that's ridiculous. What are your opinions on the matter? Prgmbeta 00:15, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

RSMV Discussion
The community wanted it closed. The thread has been open for quite a while, yet discussion never moved forward. Keeping it open, the way I see it, would be like letting this thread run forever. 19:45, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

The thread was never going to reach consensus. I recommend you read Caleb's comments as to why it should be closed. 19:04, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

I have not changed my reasoning a bit, calm down. His signature says C.Chaim, and he posted multiple times. 20:37, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

If it helps, the quotes I had in mind when I directed you to the thread where these:

''Keeping a thread open indefinitely drains the time and effort of users, especially if a discussion really is going nowhere. It would be redudant and unnecessary to keep such threads open, plus with the endless arguing back and forth, tensions and frustration tend to escalate.''

Discussions can be closed if they have been going on for a reasonable amount of time but are going nowhere.

20:43, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I was the one who asked Stelercus to close it. I would have done it myself, except for the fact that I already took a stance on it. At any rate, the RSMV thread should be closed, since there are few to none new arguments being made, and all it is doing is jacking everyone's tempers up. 02:09, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

&*$# it, open another one. And do it and ever and ever. Anyone who doesn't like the thread can bloody well ignore it. Lefty is making up his own rules and applying laws that do not apply and twisting the truth, and that should not be tolerated. But when you make a new one, keep it civil and logical, and factual. Good luck.--Degenret01 02:26, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, there I am falling in the same old trap. It is high time to turn this thing around. Put the burden of proof where it belongs. As of right now, this wiki has no policy disallowing the RSMV images. If some people want to make a policy disallowing them, then it is on them to do so. But if you upload any, follow what Robert said to do with them. If they get deleted for not being allowed, then the admin deleting them is misusing their tools. It really is that simple.--Degenret01 03:11, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you re-propose the same old thing we will get the same old result. The only way to win is to make them fail to achieve a policy disallowing the images.--Degenret01 03:42, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what your talking about when you say I am using circular logic. The thread was turning into a flame war, there was no sign of it ever achieving consensus, and it was doing nothing more than draining the community of its time. If you think you where about to fix this, then talk to some people on their talk pages. If your still convinced even then you can write a passable proposal, then do it, but that old thread is gone. 09:36, April 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * As for your comment about having getting somewhere with the proposal, I don't believe you. 09:37, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

ITS ITS ITS
You forget, this is teh intertubes, ware bad spealing is teh norm. Although, to be honest, I cringe every time I see someone use your instead of you're, and vice verse. 23:36, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:?
Well, it looked a bit washed out compared to the other thumbnails here. I didn't actually look at the full-size image. -- 16:13, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Underground images
Sorry if this seems random, but I saw your post on someone's talk about images taken underground being too dark, and you can fix this by turning scenery shadows off and turning lighting detail to low. 06:22, July 28, 2010 (UTC)