User talk:Joeytje50

Juna/Stories
Hi Joey,

I noticed that you and Play crazy1 have been working on Juna/Stories. Unfortunately, the entire pages violates Jagex's copyright, and we've already decided that we don't allow dialogue pages, which the page very obviously is. Because of that, I have to delete it. I'm sorry you've worked so hard on this. 19:24, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Raven images
Are you editing the raven images you've uploaded? In every one you uploaded the texture looks unlike any other raven I've seen. I suspect you are running them through color or contrast enhancement, which you shouldn't do, since it dramatically changes the image from how it appears in the game. And demonstrating how the object looks in-game is what the object of the wiki is, it is not to make the images look better. 23:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm ok my mistake. Apologies, Goodman Joey. 17:55, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

How's this?
On this talk page you said the article was to big. What do you think of it now? 00:40, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

what the hell
Thanks. Your post on the RSOF makes the wiki user base look like a bunch of whining spoiled children because we are not a Platinum site. Insulting and mocking the other sites listed is quite immature. If you wish to be that way, fine. But do not for a moment do so in a manner suggesting that you speak for the wiki when you do so. It demeans all of us and lessens the wiki in the eyes of all who will read that.--Degenret01 00:41, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand you want us to be platinum. What you missed is Jagexs requirements for each level. And insulting the other sites on behalf of the wiki is in very poor taste. That is NOT what will get Jagex to change their minds. --Degenret01 07:01, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

About your message you left on my talk page...
I'm sorry, Joey, for not talking to you directly, but I didn't want to cause any possible problems by bringing it up in a message on your talk page, since I was afraid that you might get angry at me for being concerned. That's why I asked Degen instead of you or anyone else, since I felt that he knew more about what I was concerned about than anyone else whom I could think of who was active on the Wiki around the time I left him that particular message. Also, I was afraid to ask you directly since I wasn't sure whether it was allowed or not, and I didn't want to draw unnecessary attention to the matter by possibly getting into a debate with you over it. In any case, I wasn't aware of the Wiki's policy concerning the matter, so that's why I asked Degen instead of you. Once more, I'm sorry for going behind your back and asking Degen about it instead of you, and now that I understand that the Wiki's policy concerning the matter allows for it in your case, I deeply regret even asking the question in the first place. 13:04, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

AA artefacts
Hoi daar. Bij de nominatie van de steencirkel in Taverley bij de FIMG, zei je dat AA artefacts een slecht randje om het object heen was. Eigenlijk is dit gewoon een slordige transparency. Ik heb nog wel wat gevonden. Ik kan het mis hebben, dus zeg het even als het zo is. 09:31, August 28, 2010 (UTC)