RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Rswfan

Nomination numero uno

Dos

Tres

Cuatro

Rswfan
I think i am ready for the rights, Recently, I have been focusing more on the community more than doing stuff like adding transparency because that is not a big community thing. I nearly have in total 2000 edits since joining on January 1st, I think my edits are very good for a user who has just joined nearly 11 months ago. I have been trying to get my mainspace edits up to a reasonable amount. 19:27, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

''I, Rswfan, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,'' 19:27, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in? I mainly intend to keep the wiki clean from vandals and bad users, I will also try and keep discussions calm when needed to.

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why? I think my best contributions are to image files and i have atleast over 100 edit's on the file namespace. I am also trying my best to take part in community discussions aswell.

'''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?''' As far as I can remember, I don't think that i have had any conflicts. So, I think this question is going to be a NO

Discussion
Strong Oppose - You still don't understand the point of this, Rswfan. :| Almost half of your edits are you editing your user page, and of the very few main space edits you have (only 57), you have been warned for misuse of the rollback tool in the past. In fact, you almost lost your rollback rights. I cannot trust you with sysop tools and I am still convinced you don't understand the significance of an RfA. It isn't all about having lots of edits. 20:24, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Andrew's response last time. -- 20:27, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - I think, based on, that you are a Wikicat, and that's not good. You have only 57 mainspace edits. I don't think you know well how to use sysop tools, and what they're all about. 20:28, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Oil 20:30, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - per all. 20:33, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per all. Sysop tools are for users that would actively use them to aid the Wiki. 20:35, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per All. 20:38, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - I think that your views are askew on being a sysop. It's not a sign of power, nor anything gratifying. Itt's not a trophy or a medal. All it does is give you some abilities on the wiki, and pixels in the clan chat. In my opinion, until you fully understand and demonstrate these, I cannot support you. 20:43, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Andrew. If you can't handle rollback you won't be able to handle sysop. 20:45, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - You have yet to understand the very administrative work you wish to take part in, other than anti-vandalism, which you haven't done much of, either. Let's see.. you've edited RS:CVU nine times. Hardly enough to be given block rights. 21:56, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - Clearly wants to be an admin just for the sake of being an admin. 22:40, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - You hardly contributed to the wiki. Oops, I mean, this wiki. On other wiki's (that you've founded) you did an enourmous amount of work, which sadly, was mostly just plaguerism. Meh.. 2k edits in 11 months would not be a reason for me to support. I achieved that ammount in 2 months.. and it didn't consist for 50% of user page edits. I appreciate you contributions but I don't think you are good enough to be an admin here. 00:00, November 1, 2009 (UTC)