User talk:C886553

/Archive

"using VDA"?
What is this "VDA" I see sometimes? 04:14, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * A counter-vandalism script that I helped to develop. See more about it at w:c:vda, if you want to. 04:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well fix it >.> It could use a minor edit changer thingy 04:21, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with it? And most VDA edits are reverts of at least 1 version...which isn't very minor.   04:24, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * (Created page with ' ~') Was spaming the RC with no Minor tag on  04:28, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not VDA as far as I know...But yeah bro, don't spam RC, I dislike Azaz's proposal...that would just give it more support.  04:32, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * (Created page with ' ~') was me copy-pasting. There is no way that AWB could do that, and VDA certainly can't. 14:19, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, 20 edits =/= rc spam ;) 00:15, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

highlighting
i think i looked better in red, but at least i'm not wearing that horrid green colour that so clashes with my bruises 22:48, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Reverting
I don't want to get into another gigantic discussion but please use rollback for vandalism and undo for good faith edits (maybe add a little summary but that optional). Thanks. 01:32, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I made a mistake with that rollback. Sorry, it happens some times. 01:35, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Er, also, you are incorrect. The entire reason why you (undo) a good faith edit is so that you can use a summary. An (undo) with no custom summary is no different than a rollback. 01:36, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, when I see "Reverted edits by blah..." I think "vandal", but when I see "Undid revision #####..." I think "incorrect edit", but this may just be me. 01:40, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't want to make an argument out of this either, but that is just you ;) 01:41, August 24, 2010 (UTC)