User talk:Azliq7

RE: Witch & Warlock set
The 'See also' links are not necessary, because the text already contains those links.--. 11:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:AJAX
Sure you can help. I'll make you an admin so you will be able to edit the MediaWiki pages. Thanks, http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk119/spencemac724/thheadshot-1.png  Spencer   TalkundefinedGuestbookundefinedEdits  14:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Achieve box
Hi! I was looking at your Achieve box when I saw you had unlocked all emotes. Then why don't you have a skill in level 99?--. 15:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

logo transparency
I'll do what i can here, as you can tell the letters are derived directly from the logo (current and former and identical lettering as i only did a makeover on the runes and shadowing). Give me a bit to play with it. Note however that it might not give the exact desired effect without a white border so i'll likely leave a white outline (right about now i'm wishing i had redone the lettering, then at least i could have a good material to work the favicon over with). 23:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The transparency is a major headache with so few pixels to work with, I'm going to have to attempt to recreate the font since i cannot find it, I emailed Vimescarrot who is the one listed as the original uploader of the version with this specific lettering. It might be easier to find a person that can "name that font" in 11 characters or less (the e and i are duplicated so that's all we have to work with to guess it:} 00:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Vimes states ey is not the creator of the artwork (wikia's history of that image file must be botched due to the server move). However, I'm going to highly recommend going with the solid background (like Wikipedia's favicon is designed), you can't really see it clearly on the first example:

Image:Searchable favicons.png

but you can see it clearly on this dark version (I've overlaid the icon as it is in it's current rendition):

Image:Searchable favicons2.png

The closest examples on that version are the Creative Commons and Amazon logos and they are less than smooth due to the small size of the favicon, I'm going to have to recommend following the Wikipedia style considering how the sample lot looks. 01:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Looking at your example screen shot regarding the tutorial, i see what was left behind in the favicon.ico that an IP edit was complaining about (the four corners). I'm attaching a clean one in .ico format that corrects the four corners issue. BTW what browser are you using? 17:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Removal of tutorial image
There is still an issue because while editing is the best time to have the image in sight. Not when viewing the Exchange price. Additionally it never showed up twice on screen, ergo there was no redundancy. 14:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It does not show up twice, what is wrong with your perception? I am not debating that the intro text can be put there, again where do you get the idea that i'm implying that the intro text cannot be avoided? Whether or not the intro text can be circumvented is not the issue. The issue put forth by you is that it showed up two times on the same screen, and that is absolutely false. Hell it doesn't even show up a single time in the link you threw at me, here. At that rate there is no point in having the text of the intro article colour coordinated with the animated image which you seem to have some sort of love/hate relationship with.  15:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * And where did you perceive that i misunderstood your specification of time frame? Explain to me the logic in your reasoning:
 * How-to-edit image should show up when a user is merely viewing.
 * How-to-edit image should not be available when actually editing.
 * Please do let me know how this is logicial? 15:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It does not appear while editing. 16:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There is one case where it would show up, but it requires:
 * The user be logged in.
 * The user has changed their editing preferences to "Show preview on first edit" which is not the default setting.
 * Therefore the majority of editors will likely not see it, my guess is you have it turned on, thus why you saw it twice. My recommendation, is to pull it from the template and put it in the edit intro, as i think more will likely see that as more people are likely going through the "edit" links when viewing either the GEMW or the article regarding the item they are doing the price update for. Unfortunately their is simply no way to guarantee it will be show.  BTW there is no javascript involved with the edit intro showing up, it's simply a matter of what link is taken there as to whether or not it gets there or not. In the majority of cases most editors will likely see the editintro text. Additionally the majority of editors will likely not see the preview on first edit. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable of the inner wiki workings could find a way to ensure that the editintro is always displayed when editing the Exhange: namespace, at which point the image could without doubt be shown when editing.  16:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Two examples logged in with default prefs and not logged in: 17:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)