User talk:Liquidhelium

You have new messages (last change).

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole.

Re:Woot
FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUU- -- 22:07, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * im in ur talk pages, removin ur red links -- 00:11, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

No BUKKITZ???
02:47, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, we both posted on each others page at the same time. By no bukkitz I mean ur polls don't cover us bukkitz. Now to be serious, as you may or may not know, I hate most trivia, and if it was up to me, that page and its subpages would die, all we need is a single Trivia/Cultural References page. But there is really nothing that can be done except a vfd. Outright deleting them would get me a lot of backlash. The next best thing is to just remove as much junk trivia as possible. Sorry I can't really be much help, trivia is an odd topic on this wiki. 02:58, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * NONBELIEVUR U WIL DIEEEE. If you actually go through the trivia articles, you will see that quite a bit of it isn't trivia, just observations about runescape, which isn't necessary in the least. But I just can't work up the energy to go through and remove all the fluff/junk trivia. 03:04, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you just moving all the trivia from triva subpages to articles? Cause quite a bit on those pages doesn't belong. 04:44, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sleep is 4 teh week nubz! But yeah, I think a vfd is appropriate, because it gives a reason to speedy-delete them if they are recreated later. 05:05, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:I was not...
I tried to stay out of the conversation, but here is my 2¢. The reason Ajr has his signature in raw code like many others is because he surfs around a lot of wikis. For one, it is very annoying each time when making a post in a different wiki for the first time having to remake the signature template. Another thing is that many other wikis don't even allow a signature template so that would be a problem. The obvious solution to that is making the signature raw code. The rule says: "Some people create a signature code by placing the raw code in the signatures box and skipping Template:Signatures entirely. This is no longer allowed as it places raw signature code on each page you sign, taking up unnecessary space." That is because a lot of signatures are this long at minimum. Ajr's signature is only 68 characters a mere 40 characters longer than the template is. The policy RS:GTS states that policies shouldn't be taken word for word, well that is exactly what it is, be practical ever though a policy states against it. That is my 2¢. 03:40, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Your opinion
Sort out all the fluff, and have an administrator delete the pages that have junk trivia/duplicate information on them. -- 20:43, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * NAOWUGH!!!!! -- 01:40, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm an eye, not a burgah. -- 01:46, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem to enjoy RfDs... -- 13:05, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * lmao -- 14:33, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * ...liquid helium -- 17:12, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * What do you mean, I don't check my new messages? Btw, this came up in the Google Image search. -- 17:20, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * ...orly -- 17:24, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just came back from lunch. -- 19:16, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I LIVE IN LITHUANIA -- 19:19, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Whatever the exact title about Parsons was...
Go ahead, I don't mind at all. I just really want him to understand that he cannot behave the way he is. That's all. 01:49, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Undoing/removing edits
Heya. While it isn't a policy or anything, I have found over time that if you tell a person on their talk page why you undid an edit it helps prevent edit wars/conflicts/issues. Making the effort to explain why we took out their edit is just plain nice. Not that I always do, but if your bored and think of it it can help. Cheers.--Degenret01 15:39, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying you did some thing wrong or made a mistake, just suggesting an idea for the future you might want to do at times. This time I mean the guy adding the clan name to the familiarization article. Of course, I did explain it to him and then he undid your fix, but usually it makes people happy to have it explained. This one is the exception to the rule I guess :P --Degenret01 15:46, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Edit report
Thanks for the bug report! The percentage should no longer go above 100%, although some of the final processing takes an indeterminate amount of time to finish. The progress may stop at 100% for a minute or so before the report appears. -- 18:51, February 20, 2010 (UTC)