User talk:Fswe1

Re
I really wouldn't make them subtemplates. The only relation they have to the Family tree template is that they use it. Subtemplates should usually be utilized by the parent template itself (Like how this particular template happens to have a /Element sub; also, every /doc). I'm really not going to stop you (or discuss this any further (it's not really a big deal)), but I'd prefer if we set a precedent of naming them as "Template: family".

Do you have any idea of when you might do this. I've been feeling kinda bored lately, so I might do this in the coming weeks. I also have a request: When/if you make any lineage templates, redirect their documentation to Template:Family tree/doc. I think I'd rather have explanation of that template appear on their page instead of some stupid filler "This template displays this lineage."

Also, 1m, yes or no? You were a superb door partner. 13:56, March 9, 2014 (UTC)

Second
Yep -- 15:20, March 9, 2014 (UTC)

RE:Ooak
Well, you don't really miss anything by not reading the books, it's just background lore that's barely referenced in the quest, they're just as enjoyable (if not more so) if read afterwards. As for the puzzle solution, seeing as it's a quest guide, I don't think we have to be worried about spoiling the solution, if people didn't want spoilers, they wouldn't be reading a quest guide. 21:09, March 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * I only put the chatheads in sections with few images, and again, if they wanted just a hint, they probably shouldn't be looking at a quest guide. I removed the line breaks because they're cluttery. Regarding images: you can zoom in, move the dialogue box closer to what's happening, and crop out irrelevant stuff. I actually have the same screen size as you, I believe. 21:21, March 13, 2014 (UTC)

Some new lore pages
They probably need more work. They're all based on Palkeera's memory.
 * Avernic
 * Tsutsaroth (tribe)
 * Alyaroth

I just redirected Byzroth to lesser demon, and left a short blurb on that page. I also put similar ones on black demon and lesser demon, and a short paragraph on K'ril Tsutsaroth as well.

Man, these memories are a lot of work to fit into existing lore. I ain't even touching pages like Freneskae. 21:06, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

Nex
Look what I did to it. 18:21, March 19, 2014 (UTC)

"Known Mahjarrat" section
I'm not so sure each of the newly introduced Mahjarrat need a segment under the Known Mahjarrat list. It makes the page look and feel incredibly cluttered, as the only ones that were in the prior list, bar Khazard and Zamorak, have a Mahjarrat Memory entry. The others are simply names with bits of personality included, which gives too few information. I'd want to move that back down to the small section I created initially, just for visual's sake. Thoughts? 00:55, March 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * The only reason I kept them around is their Mahjarrat Memories entries, haha. I'll make a few changes though! 17:35, March 23, 2014 (UTC)

edits on Seren
1. I haven't violated any rule.

2. you are wrong. Zaros did say that her and Seren are twins. Ive spoken with char pre fotg quest and she never mentioned spying on Seren.

I'm not undoing my edits. since the bulk of your edits on Seren are removing large parts of the page and supplying false info, I suggest that you stop editing Seren until you get your facts correct. 09:53, March 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * that rule that you keep quoting only applies to 3 reverts in a row, not 2. and I have read the book of char. also, made = born. even zaros says that. -- 10:03, March 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * he said that he wants to send a party, it does not say that he sent char. have you collected all the memory crystals? while I cant find proof right now, he does say it. -- 10:10, March 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * ive done firemakers curse. it seems you haven't. and go ahead, revert my reverts or your reverts because that page just needs more wrong info. i'll just do a clean edit with the correct info. -- 10:15, March 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * try providing proof that its true. -- 10:22, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
 * Personally, I see him sending Char and co as more "checking his sister is okay because he was worried about her" rather than spying. It could also be part of his claiming the World Gate from her. At any rate, the word "spying" is never used, just scouting. So yes, the "spying" section could be phrased better. 10:37, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

New pages
PLEASE please please please make sure to properly reference any new lore-related articles you make. Otherwise it's one-line articles that nobody can learn anything more about. 10:32, March 29, 2014 (UTC)

sailing jingle
where ingame does that play? :o --Jlun2 (talk) 14:04, April 1, 2014 (UTC)

RE
Don't say "Nigger" 16:43, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's a pejorative regardless of its etymology. If you think otherwise, you're a bigot. 16:51, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * In the football leagues, footballers have got in trouble for calling another player black in their native tongue (Spanish, usually). 16:53, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's usage that matters, not origins. If you really believe that to be true, go around calling black people exclusively "nigger" for the next week. 17:00, April 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Fswe, here in the Netherlands, the word 'neger' has a lot less bad meaning attached to it than it does in english-speaking countries, especially the USA. People have been fired over the use of the word 'nigger', and it is almost always used in a negative way (except for when black people themselves use it, according to US-made TV). So, just like in the 'gay means happy' discussion, and I'm not going to argue with you over this again, but the meaning changed. In this case, from simply being a word that means the exact same as 'black', to a very derogatory term for black people. If you're going to apply the logic of 'the origins' of a word, then you're also going to be able to use the same word for ass, tit, cock, and probably a lot of other words. That's the thing with bad words: they usually find origin as a second meaning for an existing word, and they gradually become more common than the original meaning.
 * So, please just never use it anywhere ever again. Both so you don't insult others, and so you don't get hated by people for using a word that has so much negativity attached to it.
 * PS: Wiktionary, which is a wikimedia project (wikimedia is famous for its neutrality) even agrees with what I'd assume is 99% of the English-speakers, in saying that 'nigger' is an ethnic slur. 21:25, April 3, 2014 (UTC)

RE:
Oops, I didn't scroll down far enough. I didn't see that he'd moved it; I thought he got rid of it entirely. But I never reverted it, what are you talking about? 09:57, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * 10:02, April 5, 2014 (UTC)

Infobox deity
Just as I expressed in the sentence summarising my alteration to the article, tending towards the terminology that is technically correct is not always necessary, due to the potential inability of the peruser to fully comprehend its denotation. 06:19, April 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * That's irrelevant because there is a monster in RS with the name Icyene, and another one with the name Vampyre. 'Autonym', on the contrary, is not mentioned anywhere in the game. Not only does it make your argument invalid, but also remember that people who play RS are more likely to know what Icyenes and Vampyres are in the first place because they are things from the game. And please explain how "presenting accurate information" with no regard to whether people understand it in the first place or not is somehow our aim here. We might as well say that if people are too lazy to check a monster's drops, that's their problem - not ours. 10:45, April 8, 2014 (UTC)