RuneScape:Featured images/File:Gu'tanoth.png

Gu'tanoth (4)
Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive2

Previous RfDs: Nomination 1 and  Nominaton 2

Reason: I'm sorry to re-nominate it again, but it is seriously starting to annoy me that this image is STILL considered great quality? It has massive flaws for the love of god. First of all, the fog is horrible, very few images have fog make the image seem a better quality and this image certainly is not one. Secondly, some of the subjects of the image have been cut off the edge of the picture, for example, the ogre on the left. Finally, the angle is horrendous, there is nothing in the middle of the picture and makes it seem very bland. This image is terrible, lets face it. These 5 examples of images that recently failed in the voting of becoming a FIMG are clearly of significant quality in comparison to this one: These clearly dominant images failed for 1 very stupid or minor error, Gu'Tanoth has atleast 3 I could name off the top of my head, probably a few more if I took the time to open the image and look correctly... This image is awful and just should not be on the FIMG template.
 * Daemonheim boat failed due to not being special, and heavily weighted to one side. Gu'tanoth image faces the same problems.
 * Har'Lakk the Riftsplitter failed for stupid reasons because the demon had wings... No legitimate reason for failure.
 * Altar of Life failed just because the water looked slightly unrealistic. The pros clearly outweighed the cons in that picture.
 * Maggie failed due to there not being a clear subject in the centre of the picture, one of the problems I've highlighted for Gu'Tanoth
 * Odd Old Man's hideout failed due to the dull and dark colours.


 * Extremely strong support - As the nominator 07:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)