RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Liquidhelium

Liquidhelium
I am nominating myself for adminship. I have been here for almost a year now, though I only really started editing the wiki in December of last year. I have over 2300 edits, including 1000 mainspace ones. I do a lot of maintenance work around the wiki, such as reverting vandalism, warning users, etc. I've noticed that recently, many administrators were slower than usual to respond to reports to the CVU, with many instances of extended periods of time between a vandal reported and a vandal warned/blocked. There are a plethora of cases of multiples users being in the CVU and no administrators checking on the cases. More administrators watching recent changes, the CVU, and administrator requests can't hurt. 22:01, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

''I, Liquidhelium, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realise that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realise that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,'' 22:11, March 5, 2010 (UTC).

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in? I intend to take part primarily in the anti-vandalism parts of an admin. As I said above, I do not feel like there are sufficient numbers of administrators watching the recent changes or the CVU. Also, I would like to be able to close forum threads and RfDs. There are many of them that have a clear consensus but aren't yet closed. Most of these are also well past the two week principle of RfD running time. The Yew Grove has some active topics that have been abandoned and more fitting in the archives.

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why? My best contributions to this wiki have to grammar and wording. I believe in a professional wiki that uses the proper rules of standard written English, and I actively correct faulty grammar and spelling. Other contributions that I am proud of include adding appropriate templates to pages that require them (including the pages that take content from RuneScape, but lack a copyright tag).

'''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?''' I have had a few conflicts with users in the past. Most of them occured around very controversial topics, most notably this. However, whever I feel like I am going to lose my cool, I always close my browser and go do something else for a few minutes (such as watch TV, play RS, listen to music, etc), until I have regained my composure. After any conflicts, I make sure to make up with all the users on the other side, so that we do not have any long term hostility.

Discussion
Not Yet - I found this in the thread Forum:Concerning Parsonsda...
 * Erm... could you tell me what AEAE is? I don't recognize it. =X

This was only two weeks ago. I fear you require more time on the wiki before becoming an administrator, though I definitely think you have the potential to be one. 02:09, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not Yet - Wait a month or two. You surely have the potential to be one. You have been doing a lot of work around here, but per Stelercus, I think you need a small amount of time. Don't get me wrong, you do a lot of work, the amount I would like to see in a candidate. The way you answered the questions too shows that you are serious about this. So, come back in about a month, and I'll gladly support. 02:16, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Pending - Liquidhelium knows what AEAE is by now. He probably just didn't know the acronym then. 03:31, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would still say that shows he requires more time. The acronym's are important in administrative work, such as linking to policies when warning others and so forth. Liquid, don't be discouraged by the probable outcome of this RFA. It appears that everyone plans to gladly support it in the future. 14:30, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I won't be disappointed. Failure is inevitable and ubiquitous. =P 14:40, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not yet - Definitely a good candidate for adminship, but a little bit too new, keep doing what you're doing, and open another RfA later on. 03:35, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not Yet - Per Muzzy and Stelercus. You definitely have the potential, I agree with the others that it may be a little too early. 03:41, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Stelercus. 08:18, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not yet - Per Stelercus. 14:32, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Weak support - Per everyone else, just needs a bit more time. -- 15:19, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not yet - liquid, your contributions and anti-vandal work are fantastic, but I would like to see you as a longer term member of the community. If you keep doing what you are doing, I can see your next RfA being sucessful without a doubt. -- 22:14, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not yet - I have noticed that you have a lot potential, but I reckon you should just wait a while, learn a bit about the wiki and its policies and grow in general experience. 03:02, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral - I see you as an avid community member and probably an administrator of the future, although it's a bit early and I think it may be better if you wait a little longer and gain more experience. 10:31, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Not yet - Maybe in the future, but I don't think that you are well enough acquainted with many aspects of this wiki. 10:38, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Not Yet - Per Steler. 13:51, March 7, 2010 (UTC)