User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five (5 and 6 cross some)
 * Six
 * Known I.P.s I have had. Special:Contributions/216.136.67.224

Look, I have already been spammed. SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM

Re:Wiki search
You could do a Google search for that. 06:26, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn, I got ninja'd. I was going to suggest that as well. Unfortunately you can't search by namespace. I wonder if we could get Lucene Search enabled here. 06:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lucien is real? He does searches? I thought he was a bad person.--Degenret01 06:40, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats on your 3rd year on the Wiki! 07:10, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Making the links to User/Admin help "bigger"
Well, I wouldn't try making the links larger, as it would disrupt the flow of text. We could, however, assign it a colour or some other text decoration (like an underline). Here's some sample text.

"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam fringilla tristique ante, eu hendrerit turpis fringilla nec. Vestibulum elit est, vestibulum sit amet mattis quis, RuneScape:User help pharetra id nunc. Mauris at neque quam. Quisque a elit at orci posuere hendrerit volutpat nec ante. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Fusce vel enim eu quam tincidunt placerat eget id sapien."

Actually, the large text isn't as bad as I thought it would be. I still suggest a shade of purple (if anything), as we are running low on colour-options not already in use.

Anyway, if I were you, I'd take it to the YG and see what happens. 00:52, March 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * I was going to move them underneath all the other links so they would not interrupt flow, and to help them stand out.--Degenret01 01:19, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * If it doesn't require any changes to the CSS files, then you can just use  tags.  10:11, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Here it is :D
You may have seen it before.. but here is the awesomeness ^^ 07:54, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Sentra's RFA
Yeah, I thought there might be a possibility of community backlash from the closure, but it appears that certain facts are being exaggerated..I'm dealing with it in IRC, but I may simply write up a response regarding the closure on the RfA itself.

As to RuneScape, I might come back in June, but I acctually have a couple of goals to reach in real life, so maybe November. 08:42, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Main Page links
Yeah, links should be kept at the minimum. I have modified RuneScape:Events Team/Notice but the main page is still showing the old version. 00:39, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

RS:ET/Notice
I'm fine with the changes az did to remove the unneeded links, but seriously >_>? Is 2 links really that much? You may think that the corp is well known but i still belive it to be a usefull link. Its a quick link straight to the monster's page for players that dont know what it is and a refresher for people that have heard about it but need the actual facts, which the event page doesnt provide. The event page assumes prior knowledge of the beast, and then provides tactics and the like. So, can i go re-add the link? (I'd do it and then come explain but it comes dangerously close to edit-waring and sentra would take any excuse to "cool down" block me :P) - 04:15, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * : o/ yeah, i guess... Fine, ill go add a section for helpful/required/related link to the page. - 04:31, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Why.
Why did you leave me to be with cheesecake why! D: --Cakemix 12:53, March 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Whai, D: I've been up for 16 hours doing nothing and this is what I get, I'm going to sleep :< --Cakemix 12:56, March 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * :D --Cakemix 12:59, March 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * ok, I won't answer that (: --Cakemix 13:11, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

re:Signature
If you meant what's on Forum:April Fools' 2011, that's not my signature. It's to show what we could do for april fools'. And as this is part of the discussion now, and we shouldn't delete discussions, I'd think it should still be kept. I am not trying to game the system (if you really want it gone, you should say so), but I just think that, as part of a discussion, it should be kept. 13:49, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Problem
I dedicate my userpage to you  18:27, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Your userpage...
I likey. I think we should grow more like the U.S.S.R. 01:30, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Troll
I'd appreciate if you'd stop calling me one. Put up or shut up: make a thread and get me banned or hush. Your potshots in the cc are tiresome. 01:33, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop baiting, and I will stop calling you on it.--Degenret01 01:40, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not baiting, and you're not calling me on it. RHQ truly is superior to the wiki in many areas. Suspend your venom and consider that you might be wrong about my intentions. 01:47, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Errrrm
This need to be deleted i think, but im not actually sure why... >_> - 10:19, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Somehow calling it a clan article gave me lulz.--Degenret01 10:24, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Leaving party
You be coming? 10:32, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol ok, thanks. 10:39, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Swim
Oh yeah...? *cowers and throws Bork at Degen* 10:32, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

House
- 08:43, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Hai
Sylvia siddell

My fav peices: http://geocities.com/s_siddell/transformer.html


 * http://geocities.com/s_siddell/revealed.html

One of her exibitions: http://geocities.com/s_siddell/between-fire-and-rain.html

EDIT: Heres braque:http://www.google.co.nz/images?hl=en&q=braque&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=1366&bih=638

Here is Mr smither..

http://www.prints.co.nz/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/8037_Rocks_with_Mountain_Smither_Michael.jpg http://www.michael-smither.co.nz/images/026.jpg.jpg This is the one i just drew with my own towels and chair c: http://www.gallerydenovo.co.nz/artists/images/Michael%20Smither/Massage%20Towels%20&%20Blankets.jpg

Tehehehe..The last one is my favourite by far :D

http://starr-art.com/artists/jim_dine/large/Jim_Dine_Shellac_Orientals.jpg http://www.senefelderstiftung.com/data/gallerie/19961-96%20Dine.jpg http://images.artnet.com/artwork_images/424570465/325380.jpg http://cs.nga.gov.au/IMAGES/MED/45710.JPG http://www.mnartists.org/uploads/users/user_6900/7b85498a863cabcfba786a4456cf88c8/7b85498a863cabcfba786a4456cf88c8.jpg http://images.artnet.com/artwork_images/592/161463.jpg

Heres my towel sketch >.<

http://tinypic.com/r/302m5i9/7

Closure
Oh, come on. This has nothing to do with me. The nominator withdrew the proposal and therefore it should be closed. How is that remotely wrong? 00:35, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of cases where after the proposer has withdrawn we close the thread. Considering that no one had supported the thread at the time of the withdrawal and subsequent closure, it didn't really "belong" to anyone. 01:12, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

D:
Well.. i tired..

http://tinypic.com/r/2mfccw5/7

08:57, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

April fools
Thought you might like to see one of the 4 things i'm planning for April fools >:D - Main page - 12:40, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nowww, I need need a few admins who are willing to help me put in place some... changes, on the 1st. Which is why I show you this now instead of later ^_^ - 13:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

RE
It's been complained about in the past, just see the talk page (for just about the same reason). And in response, there are plenty of mistakes on the wiki when the articles are complete, this doesn't mean we put a warning on the page saying it may be inaccurate. It doesn't add to it at all. Smithing 03:28, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

I think the purpose of this template is to tell an admin not to delete a page as they're currently expanding it (it avoids pages being redirected, merged or deleted due to lack of content). It also encourages other people to help expand the article (in a direct manner). What I was trying to say is that articles on this wiki may be inaccurate due to vandalism etc. regardless of it being under construction or not (the {current} template also does not display this, it just says info may change as the event progresses). Very non-notable items, stub articles etc. also have a greater chance of being inaccurate, this doesn't mean a warning is suitable for them. And, in the case that an article is inaccurate, the issue should be fixed or brought up on the talk page, and the dispute tag should be added to the article. Smithing 06:10, March 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * This will be my last comment on this topic for now. I'll seek consensus to remove/reword it later. Yes, it's true it doesn't make sense without a dispute; was just saying what should be done in case it is or may be inaccurate. And for the second part, that's not true. There have been instances that could've been avoided if the tag was put up (see this for example). If more time had been given, the page could've been expanded to include information not on the RuneScape page. And users should already be aware any articles on this Wiki may be inaccurate, see RuneScape:General disclaimer.


 * My second problem, other than the redundancy to the General disclaimer, is that the phrase itself is not accurate. "The information contained within this article should not be considered fully accurate until the article contributor(s) have removed this tag." This phrase says that an article should be considered accurate if the tag itself is removed, which is not always the case. For example, if an article was vandalized with clearly false info, then the article should not be considered accurate at all. Smithing 02:03, March 30, 2011 (UTC)