User talk:Battleben

First
17:23, October 23, 2015 (UTC)

Troll
why 18:08, October 24, 2015 (UTC)

Merge Articles with Camel God
Why not just put a formal merge request of Camel God and Akthanakos using the rfm template? --Deltaslug (talk) 19:01, November 18, 2015 (UTC)

You're invited!
To my 120 party. It's finally happening. Runecrafting Guild
 * Where?

World 46
 * What world?

~ US ~
 * When?
 * PST: 2:00 PM on 5-Dec
 * MST: 3:00 PM on 5-Dec
 * CST: 4:00 PM on 5-Dec
 * EST: 5:00PM on 5-Dec

~ Europe ~
 * UTC/GMT: 10:00PM on 5-Dec
 * BST: 11:00 PM on 5-Dec

~ Australia ~
 * AWST: 6:00 AM on 6-Dec
 * ACST: 7:30 AM on 6-Dec
 * AEST: 8:00 AM on 6-Dec
 * ACDT: 8:30 AM on 6-Dec
 * AEDT: 9:00 AM on 6-Dec

Thanks for coming if you can,
 * Edit: Change of date, also fixed some Australian timezones from PM to AM.

I wont be here on Christmas, so have an early greeting! :) -- 16:25, December 21, 2015 (UTC)

Macaroni penguin?
What macaroni penguin? 14:41, December 23, 2015 (UTC)

some things
File:MountFirewake2.jpg

File:MountFirewake3.jpg

Wanna retake these since you seem to be the one to take scenery? --Jlun2 (talk) 15:17, January 1, 2016 (UTC)

Imps, hobgoblins, Myreque, Falador NPCs, miscellania
I trust request that you will deal with the respective GU entries? Gracias. 17:06, January 11, 2016 (UTC)
 * Please, man. 20:35, January 13, 2016 (UTC)
 * Come on man. 09:46, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh come on. 18:43, January 28, 2016 (UTC)

gnome challenge pics
Since you have done the challenge, can you please update File:Glophren reward.png? --Jlun2 (talk) 21:16, February 3, 2016 (UTC)

re
Yew Grove is irrelevant. Real world law overrides any local policy or consensus. 20:32, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's literally against the law. It doesn't need community input. 21:05, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Some Like it Cold
Are you going to be replaying Some Like it Cold any time soon? If you could, could you update the pictures, 'specially the one in Grim's office? Pls and ty -- 13:55, March 14, 2016 (UTC)

retake
Don't you have a quest alt? File:Fighting the chaos dwarf.png is broken. 13:22, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Ghosts and stuff
Whence the ruddy hell are you getting these ghost and removed NPC images, and why not sort out GU first? :( 06:19, April 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know what's up with some of the chatheads you uploaded, but they're horribly glitched it seems. I think it might be nxt. Please stop using that for images, in that case. Did you orb some of the areas unique to the quest, and the decapitated Myreque chatheads? 19:18, April 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * As I said, please stop using nxt for images then, especially since it's nothing more than an open beta atm. Can confirm everything looked fine in Java (openGL ofc, since DirectX chatheads still lack depth texture). :) And damn...got any alts? 19:35, April 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * Nature Spirit images appear fine-ish - mostly chatheads and items seem to be affected. So, I guess, don't use nxt if a chathead is visible. :) 19:37, April 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * If either of you have any alts that haven't done Priest in Peril, the River of Blood livestream showed that quest was slightly updated with River of Blood's release. The dialogue at the door-knocking scene. If one of you could get the new dialogue onto the transcript, that would be great. 19:39, April 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, wonderful. Thanks. Btw are you "Wahisietel the cake" on twitch? 19:44, April 28, 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was on there. Made my account just to join in the fun. 19:58, April 28, 2016 (UTC)

Re:NXT
That's balderdash. It's not "current" in the sense of "only", nor is the other version "obsolete". It still exists and is supported. NXT is fine where its faults are extremely minor or cannot be seen - location images should preferably be taken in NXT. However, you cannot possibly claim that stuff like items, chatheads and pretty much anything slightly zoomed in that shows the AA glitches should be preferred to Java. It doesn't matter what I think (as I said on Jlun's talk, there are images I'd have wished to revert personally but didn't because I couldn't objectively justify doing so) - if something is objectively of worse quality, it should not be used. 18:22, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * PS. The reason for the reverts, if I hadn't made that plain, wasn't "I don't like it" or "this is NXT", but "x, y, z are clearly worse than in the previous image and/or this adds no improvement over the previous version in return". Off topic, do you think Dassocles and Apherna should get pages? And all the other dead Icyene? 18:29, April 29, 2016 (UTC)
 * I asked you not to use NXT for images that contain chatheads or obvious glitches. It's *clearly* bugged. So please don't, and "NXT is newer" is not a valid reason not to. If it looks worse and doesn't add anything better-looking (e.g. draw distance, if that's required) in return, common sense dictates it shouldn't be used. That applies to NXT and literally anything else, e.g. yak hair. 07:41, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not merely different; looking at the outline of e.g. Gadderanks and Vanstrom anyone can see that it's distorted and glitchy. And good job, I noticed Sarius's head was fine, for instance. As for e.g. Ral, I doubt this was properly tested if that's the case. He may be thin, but his hat certainly isn't. :P Also, look, Sir Whrenity. 12:31, April 30, 2016 (UTC)
 * Welp, if they wanted it to be thin, they'd have updated the chathead across the board, I reckon. My recommendation would be to use the proper AA for nxt images unless it features a chathead (or otherwise looks bad), in which case use Java. Because it doesn't have broken chatheads and stuff. Preferably OpenGL for lighting and textures, which are still glitchy in DirectX. 12:38, April 30, 2016 (UTC)