User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five (5 and 6 cross some)
 * Six
 * Known I.P.s I have had. Special:Contributions/216.136.67.224

Look, I have already been spammed. SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM

READ BEFORE POSTING If you are here about the April fools changes, it's all good.--Degenret01 00:10, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

April Fools Changes
I didn't read before posting, and it's not all good. 00:10, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * How ironic coming from you. You closed the thread saying to just do it. Sooo....everything that happens is now your fault. Including future hurricanes and earthquakes.--Degenret01 00:23, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I suppose you didn't hear my irony sarcasm. I love the new main page. 00:23, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * My bad, I will install a new irony/sarcasm detector program.--Degenret01 00:25, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

You forgot (or ignored) the logo.--00:27, April 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * I uploaded, I don't know why it did not change. I think it is the cache not updating all that quickly.--Degenret01 00:29, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * You might have uploaded it in the wrong place. I think this is the logo. I think favicon is the little picture that appears in your browser tab. -- 00:36, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I tried the right place, but get a "file extension does not match mime type" error. IDK wtf that means.
 * Just to confirm you tried to upload this file at File:Wiki-wordmark.png? -- 01:08, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I converted it first with that site Pharos gave me, then tried uploading it at the link wiki wordmark, yes.--Degenret01 01:13, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * For the logo (wiki wordmark) you just need to upload it as it is. You only need to convert the file for the favicon. -- 01:28, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * It isn;t letting me upload. Ask Gaz.--Degenret01 01:31, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok I'll stop bothering you now =D. -- 01:39, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

green for a day
Yes, it's great to see all those hilites. It shows The Superior Status of Sysops. It's just that not only all sysops have the hilite, all users have it. 00:44, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I know, but tis the only time ll the sysops will. Until I leave at least.--Degenret01 00:46, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Why don't you like your symbol of might over other users who also have the hilite? I think it looks great on you. 00:56, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * We should just keep it this way, so everyone can feel special. 00:59, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I just like the colour. -- 01:08, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would support all confirmed users being green. It looks nice on a brown wiki.--Degenret01 01:13, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Let's do that! 01:15, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you sure? -- 01:39, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Im liking having a green name :D lets do it everyday! Admins can have pink names :) - 06:16, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

The wiki
You broke it :O

02:14, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Did you notice what day it is?
today's april fools >_> (I'm chess btw) User:Archive 1 06:54, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

The Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hqw94Yrsnjs&feature=player_embedded 08:55, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Indef blocks for proxies
The thing that one needs to understand about open proxies is that they are very static 99% of the time - meaning that they are only used as proxies, and not legitimate IP addresses. That being said, some of the more common proxies are usually abused, so indef blocking them is good to prevent future abuse. That being said, if someone does have a legitimate reason to be using a common, previously abused proxy, the template that the range/IPs are blocked with contains information on how to request unblock - and honestly, there are very few legitimate reasons for editing with a proxy, especially on this wiki where the vast majority of users live in the "free" world, and don't need to worry about governments looking over their shoulders. 13:53, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Block
If you check his deleted contribs, you'll see that he linked an external site which contains viruses. 08:17, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Woops, my bad.--Degenret01 08:21, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's all good. The point of deleting the edit is so people don't see it, so I guess it worked out :P 08:21, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Wtf
Seriously, stop undoing my edits. Everytime the disk is mentioned, it's called dor and that is understood by everyone around. Simply because you are unaware, clearly doesn't mean it's not in common usage by most players.

Re: Disk of Returning
Wow that is astonishing. I hear "dor" thrown about all the time ingame :S A fair amount people are talking about it, since being a discontinued item, it's always gaining value, and rather rapidly atm. Fair enough then. Ant59 12:54, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

FYI
I thought, maybe you didn't know... clear works better than adding br's. I hope it helps. 23:08, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Policies
I had talks with Ryan, Evil and suppa (who closed the thread). We came to the agreement that there was little support for actually adding the policy navbar (as opposed to using MediaWiki:Communitymessages-notice-msg as a communication tool), and that using a large navbar menu for editor-related policies made little sense when fewer than 1% of the people who see the wiki have ever edited. In addition, most people who care about the policies know how to get to them. Ryan said that his argument that it would stop people feigning ignorance about policies was fairly weak, and Ryan and I later asked around in IRC and the clan chat about whether people thought the Policies bar was useful. The overwhelming reply was no. Is there any chance you can get on RuneScape or IRC soon? 04:08, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't have logs of the clan chat conversation, but...

Hope that satisfies you. 04:11, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Query with Ryan
 * Query with Evil
 * Public conversation

Mind litter.png
Hi,

Don't be sorry, rather give me a reason. -- 15:08, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

RE:previously rejected conditions
Hey, sorry I couldn't get back to you about that until now; I was rather busy. I agree that the number of times that a given proposal fails isn't everything, however looking through the other threads, there only seemed to be a debate in the sense that a couple of users were adamant that the media should be allowed. These select few merely argued the same point in an attempt to refute the opposition. I attempted to be as neutral and as fair as I could in my judgement of the arguments, and that was what I saw. 05:17, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm with Suppa on adding the subject to the previously rejected list. It has come up many times in the past and brought nothing but huge amounts of drama each time. Most of us are beyond tired of hearing about minor technicalities that prove, once and for all, that we can use cache images. On the subject of technicalities, I think it should be allowed regardless of the fact that it doesn't perfectly fit the supplied criteria. I believe the previously rejected list exists to keep us from going over the same discussions over and over when such discussions inevitably result in no consensus at best and a colossal flamewar at worst. Remember that the previously rejected list is not a blacklist; such topics are still allowed, but proponents of the proposals must carefully consider the reasons for frequent rejection and come up with something new, lest they piss everyone else off by just bringing up the same old arguments. It sounds like a perfect candidate for the previously rejected list to me. -- 06:28, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

The Dandys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0H1blQckNw0 09:07, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Capes
If we can get them popular and working that would be wonderful. But at this point I'm not optimistic that we'll see any changes. People continue to be lazy about everything, including awarding wikicapes. I agree that it's worth a try, but I'm not holding my breath. 12:41, April 8, 2011 (UTC)