User talk:Psycho Robot

Note: I will reply to all comments on this page. I don't care if you never see my reply because you forgot to check back or because you didn't know I responded. That's not my problem.

Re
Maybe "hate" was a bad word. I guess I dislike it because a signature is what a user identifies themself as, and I think they should be able to identify themselves however they wish. I understand not allowing >2 images, because that may affect others with slow computers. But if Ajr wants to use '-', why not? I mean, when I first saw the sig, I said "Hmm? who is this '-' person?" I commenced to hover over his signature, find out it was him, and then I knew every time I saw his signature that it was he who was signing. I don't know about others, but it's not a problem for me. If it links to the userpage without any mystery/misleading links, and it is in no way intentionally trying to hide the identity of who posted it, I think it's fine. As many have said in discussions about the policy, if you really want to know who posted something, click the signature. --LOL MYSTERY SIG 21:17, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, that's not actually my signature. 21:17, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hellote
Sorry about that, I didn't know about that. Shouldn't happen again. Ptmmtp20:38, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

I am a wizard,
It's this new thing called e-mail. 21:03, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Try fansites@jagex.com. 21:08, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

*dun dun dun dun* Another page gets nerfed *dun dun dun dun*
Yep, Special: WikiaActivity just lost its side bar.

This is my homepage for rs wikia as I like to see what was going on in terms of most editors :C

Try get it back? :3 Dmck2b 08:04, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

AWA
Hi thar. Haven't seen you for a while. Yes, I got an e-mail from them (and I think Liquid got three). I pretty much told them that we weren't interested. 05:28, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup, that. 03:53, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

"Things to do when you are bored" suggestions
I'll add that, thanks. 19:38, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Don't delete what you don't understand
I just analysed them a bunch and wrote a miniessay on them, but then I noticed that joey got his numbers wrong in the opening paragraph. Loop repeats 150 times, Repeat 99 and Multi 1399. Thus Repeat is more server expensive and repeats less times than Loop.

If repeat were to be increased, I'm not sure how it would affect what resources it would use, so I don't think its wise. Thus repeat isn't really that useful, and repeat and multi should be interchangeable. Loop, as he said, is a lot less server intensive and should stay.

Thus a delete/merge with multi and repeat is okay, as long as all transclusions are updated. Loop should stay, and in case you wondered for loop is completely different so should also stay. 15:32, December 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Spam
I know that everything will sort itself out in the end. Now, robots aren't supposed to have opinions... Oh, and RS:PRIAR has been modified to RS:PRIARUIDWH, aka RuneScape:Psycho Robot Is Always Right Unless I Disagree With Him. Cheers, 02:41, December 14, 2010 (UTC)

IMAGES GONE NUTS!
First of all: WTF is that awful ad of that Warcraft thing?! Second of all: WTF is going on with thumbnailed/framed images on MonoBook (I already checked oasis)? Here's an image: 14:52, December 16, 2010 (UTC) http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn280/Scrachasniff/Imagesgonenuts.png
 * But I'm used to IE6... And is that the only way to solve it? Strange that it only started on Tuesday... 07:20, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Logging project
Hi. I just started a project, and i'd like to ask you to join. As you seemed to like the idea of having drop logs for all monsters on the thread proposing this, i thought you probably also want to help. Why I created this project is because the proposal only has opposes so far, so i don't really think it will pass(unless the others change their mind) but i am already starting the logging, and if you want to join, please do so. 23:18, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

What picture did you put on there? I'd like to know

Oh i know what you're saying now. I uploaded the same picture twice on accident. I guess thanks anyways. (Decided I'd try and do it myself. Didn't know administrators did it for me O.o)

By the way, I'm about to upload an HD picture so let me know if you're going to post it on that page or if I am. Thanks

I believe i've messed up. Sorry for the inconveniences, but i'm new to editing things on Rune-Wiki. It would be a huge favor if you could please fix it.

alrighty, thanks :D

I lol'd
Very creative summary, sir. 00:07, December 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * A certain user we all know and love (to an extent) has no chance. I think you know who I mean... 00:16, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

It cant be fake
How is the image fake? It looks pretty decent to me. Some guy on rs told me about it. Gave me the link. but if u think that is the case delete it. Game rocker 23:23, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * I realyl think it is not a false image. Game rocker 03:26, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

MERRY CHRISTMAS!
I was too lazy to make a template, so consider the following a template plox:

MERRY CHRISTMAS

see? I'm pro at fancy holiday templates. 20:42, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Reminder
Please remember to remove/replace any file links after deleting a file. 12:23, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

btw
nou 16:22, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

I was digging in my files one day cleaning my computer and i found this image from my old rsc/rs2 account/ There you have it

and
I am trying to duplicate the random skill logo effect which appears on the main page on this wiki on a wiki I'm working on. I saw that you did some work on these templates, so I have a question. Do you know why it is that these pictures update on the main page when I wait about 15 seconds and then click the refresh button? It's as if clicking refresh purges the page. When I duplicated this on my wiki, everything works fine except that the images that I used take a very long time to change. The only quick way I can get them to refresh is by manually making the page purge. Please help if you can. Thanks. 01:12, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks. I'll check that out.  11:19, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

I demand that you respond on MY talk page!
I'm sorry, but I might have to amend RS:PRIAR to include a "Release from bondage" section where those under your absolute control can escape if they have moral qualms about your commands. 02:35, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Same-robot marriage
I do not support same-robot marriage.

Love, 00:48, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No exceptions, sorry. 07:18, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, we must preserve artificial life form marriage the way it was intended to be. 17:54, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * psycho robot will you marry me -- 20:04, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

The policy on unblocks
Hey, is there a link to a comprehensive guide on how a blockee, sysop and the community should react and what actions they should take should someone want an unblock?

Like, does the "Blockee" just place the unblock template on their page, which adds the category, then a sysop makes a decision?

I'm just curious, I may have a decent proposal for the YG if the unblocking system works the way I think it works.

Thanks, 22:51, January 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * So, you're telling me that if someone finds themselves blocked, they can't refute their own block? Especially if we are talking about infinite/long term blocks? 08:27, January 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just curious, I was thinking of making some sort of RfU proposal, where specific accounts, under their own request, would be able to try and refute their block. This idea came from the recent block thread and it just seems rather unfair that people don't get given a second chance. 08:25, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Your Profile.
It shows why many sites have left Wikia. Imdill3 02:42, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * lol aww that's too bad. Your talking about Wikia right? --Imdill3 03:59, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * I hear ya. Heres what I did for HabboWiki: INvite tons of friendly Anon folk from 4chan. And done. (All admins would have to stop effort though :/) Anyways I made you a picture. Put it on your fridge xD --Imdill3 04:22, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/1830/wikia.png

http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/387/shoutwiki0.png

Sorry, OCD had to upload a compared site. (Note that the ads advertise the accual site, and not the rival game). Imdill3 04:36, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

RE:HS string blah blah blah
Rofl, nice prediction, I did lose interest... I guess I'll just stick with updating it manually. ^^

03:52, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Rare drop icon
Yes, i thought it would be nice, but i forgot transparency.. 20:22, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Whar u been
Saikorobotto, I miss you. Never leave me! 07:07, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. Zaphod is my semi-half cousin, by the way. The achievements are here for a 2-week trial, but chances are they'll be gone in about 11 days. Aaaanyway, I want to see you again and I luf u.  20:27, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Shush, don't tell Liquid. 20:32, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

um hai im new here.... arent u supposd 2 be ded??? 04:30, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * but but but dnt u reciev mai payments???? i sent u liek $9001 or somethin. pls go away >:(  04:36, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * ffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu- 04:49, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: I Wanna be the Scapeguy
If people start to rage, I blame you! 11:54, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

My Pet, the relaunch
I know, I know, I stopped helping. Blame many things, such as my comp crashing and losing at least 3 vulture sets and a monkey set I had not uploaded. And that just turned me off huge. But anyhow, how accurate do you consider the current state of the checklist? I am going to go start a monkey at least, those I can raise while doing agility since no familiar is as good as pie in boosting that.--Degenret01 09:02, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

image
do u mean it meant to be e.g 100x100? -- 11:42, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Completionist cape
That's taken from this video. 17:06, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

:)
the nice player who owns the cape gave me a clip just for wiki, hooray! -- 07:53, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

no
no not that clip, it was of a golden dragon, castle wars gave me it, it may not be on yet, it him doing emote in lumbridge swamp. we just having clip problems, he made a little deal with me, i give him epic shots i took of him, he gives me wiki data, like the invent images, and the clip, sorry for the delay on clip, it just having, some faults. if u need proof just tell me as ill give u proof. -- 09:38, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Hey
I want to meet you in rs, what's your rsn? -- 00:15, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status of RuneScape videos on YouTube
Hi Psycho,

I was wondering whether or not RuneScape videos on YouTube (like the ones you blocked Parsonsda for copying) could even be copyrighted. I'm not exactly versed in copyright law, so forgive me if I go off on a tangent. The first thing I think we should consider is fair use. The purpose and character is a bit muddled because of the commercial nature of Wikia, but it could also be said that its purpose was enrichment, as Parsons has no reason to upload the clips for the purpose of profitability. The nature of the copied work is that it's a clip of RuneScape, and Jagex can claim any and all clips of RuneScape. The substantiality and amount is approximately 9 seconds per clip, out of three videos which ranged from one to three minutes. I don't see any effect on the work's value, either.

The other thing to consider is that the uploader of the YouTube videos have no rights over the clips, just as the RuneScape Wiki has no rights over images that are used elsewhere. Jagex holds all copyrights on any pictures (moving or not) of RuneScape, so we can't really assume that the clip is copyrighted by the uploader.

I'm not sure if you blocked Parsonsda for the actual infringement, or for somehow breaking RS:IMP. While it does say "Nearly all images uploaded to the Wiki should be taken by the uploader themselves in the RuneScape game client", there are at least four other files on the wiki that are taken from YouTube videos, without any disastrous consequences. 19:51, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Even if Youtube videos are copyrightable, the RuneScape ones very likely are not. The amount of work put into them is not a factor, as Jagex has shown in shutting down numerous videos. I think it's a bit of a stretch to consider YouTube a fansite, especially considering the clips we already have "stolen" from them. There are enough overt uses of Youtube videos that blocking Parsons for doing the exact same thing seems a bit much. 20:20, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * If I'm not mistaken, Parsons got permission for at least one of the videos. My point is not that the rule was not there, but that it had become so common to use animations and pictures from YouTube that no one, especially Parsonsda, took issue with it. I'm not trying to defend him, I'm simply saying that such a long block for such a commonplace occurrence seems unusual. 21:12, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I do believe when he said "Castle Wars" he meant the player Castle Wars, who uploaded the third video. I have no idea how many animations we have from YouTube, but I thought of three off the top of my head, plus a couple of stills. I imagine there are many more than that. 21:32, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * My understanding was that Parsonsda talked to him ingame. He showed me this picture. 23:44, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * He says that his "friend" sent him the clips on his school e-mail which apparently he...can't access for two weeks. Sounds unlikely to pan out and another "my cousin at Jagex" type thing, but we'll see. If he's lying about the whole thing I have no problem seeing him banned for a while. But you must by now realize that his attention span doesn't quite reach more than a year. 00:11, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Neither do I. 00:17, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like we got retroactive permission from the uploader of video one, and the uploader of video two, while being un-messageable on YouTube, seems to have an account on the wiki. What do you make of this? 19:15, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought that Omustardo was Castle Wars, or at least took the video of him. The Daemonheim video was the one created by a user on the wiki. The larger issue is that I don't think your logic in blocking him was sound: the idea of equating YouTube to a fansite is a bit outrageous, especially considering that it was the status quo for the past year to allow them. 21:52, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

The popularity of the block is not what I'm worried about - But you have to realize that the agreement was reached more than a year ago, and it is very unclear whether or not what Parsons did even violated the images and media policy. I don't like Parsons any more than the next guy and he's been quite rude to me at times, but we can't just look for an out to block someone. As for what Liquid said, you can hardly use that as reasoning to block someone, even if he did agree to it. It's an incredibly weak argument and I very, very much doubt that anyone at all would support a six month block for "not accepting help". 23:40, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I really have no idea. I assumed that the Parsonsda block thread from last April-May was mostly about the youtube videos, but upon further review that doesn't seem to be the case. Perhaps we should have a thread to decide if we allow youtube clips? That still leaves the issue of Parsons's block, of which we can't use a later consensus as grounds to keep. 01:20, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the block and the entire thread was based on the (apparently false) premise that we have a policy against uploading clips from YouTube. While your intent when starting the thread may have been for the most part about YouTube, you can tell that the discussion went off in a completely separate direction to the point where you can hardly say that that thread gave consensus against copying YouTube; it ended up being about honesty, breaking agreements and Parsons's lack of coherence. In fact, the majority of the thread ended up being about discussion of the punishment with comparatively little debate over the merits of the reasoning. Looking at it a year later, I honestly cannot see anything on the Images and media policy that would disallow the use of YouTube clips, unless you count YouTube as a fansite, which I don't think holds much water. Considering the examples I gave of other YouTube clips and images (which were not scrutinized by anyone whatsoever), I think we can safely say that no one else who saw them considered them to be against policy. I'm also not trying to defend Parsons, but when there's such a consequence for something that seems fairly ordinary, I like to explore what's going on. 08:30, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think that anyone read the policy made the connection that it didn't include YouTube, especially someone like Parsonsda. I think that everyone just assumed that taking such content was lawful. That being said, do you think we should amend the policy to redact the prefix "fan"? I also don't see why we have to remove the agreement he made, although the wording and the intent will have to be adjusted. If he knowingly violates a policy we can certainly block him (although I do think that six months is rather severe), but the YouTube videos don't seem to be a violation. That thread really came down him lying more than the actual infractions that took place. 20:27, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that I think about it, it may be a good idea to have Parsons sign a new contract when he's unblocked, mostly to...refresh his memory a bit. 20:29, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Ohai Mr Robot. I have been reading and rereading all this fun stuff (amazing so much work for sysops can be generated by one user right?) and I think at this time the block is unfair, unless he lied some where and we have proof. I am not calling you wrong or anything, I clearly see why you issued the block. But as you say, the issue has much mud on it making it a bit hard to see all aspects at once. If not, then I think we need to proceed with unblocking him, and amending our policy on YT vids so it is clearly laid out. Does this work for you?--Degenret01 10:17, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

one more animal down
The page is complete, take a gander Monkey_(pet).--Degenret01 22:22, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Vultures suck. Ugly ass birdies. --Degenret01 05:38, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

block
now im unblocked, i just like to say sorry, i may of not understood ur messages, im not a very easy reader. if u put lots of text i only read parts of it, if u ever see something wrong again, just put topic as block warning, that all i need to understand, again sorry, and thanks for unbanning me :) -- 16:08, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

o
I filmed it myself from my own character doing the emote. But my Camtasia always fucks up the colors and quality!!! 20:00, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

userpage
sir there is an error on your userpage

The files that were supposed to be evidence against parsons are now replaced by new versions (except for the max cape, which is high enough quality to be sure it's not from youtube) so you can remove the errors again if you want.

No I am not talking about Wikia's adspam, I'm talking about the Wikia thumbnail fail, in case you might be confusing a fail with a fail. 18:21, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

What the crap?
What the crap is this:

"Why should they be given a second chance? If someone vandalises once they'll always vandalise. Its a scientifically proven fact based on absolutely nothing." 02:44, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Forum:Rules for the Chat
you, sir, are gonna get pwnt by rule 3. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL 10:21, July 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now you behavior gone way to far. This isnt the first thing you done like this. After I was doing some warning of him, a user left me a message a few seconds after Psycho Robot left me a strong warning. I was doing it but he has no right to just jump in. i also hear it not only me, many user aren't happy with this user. what i suppose is removing a rank from him, making him a roll-back, this seem like the right thing to do, as currently he doesn't act like a admin, until he learn to be a bit nicer to users, he should be a roll-back, that all i can say for now, please post your Discussion on my thread, thanks -- 10:36, July 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then I'll have to get the local police invoved. I have no other choice. 09:37, July 26, 2011 (UTC)

Hello Crazy Automaton
Why, I see that thou art back, my master. 16:11, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Er, right. In other news, RuneScape:Psycho Robot Is Always Right gets repealed and replaced with RuneScape:Psycho Robot Is Our New Coffee Machine. I must say, I quite like RS:PRIONCM. 03:13, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course. PRIONCM stands for Prions Can Murder. Anyways, there's nothing wrong with a healthy dose of misfolded brain protein. 05:24, September 16, 2011 (UTC)

Fail
http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/FailNinja.png Ninjas pop in, say Ninja, without anyone noticing. You sir, are a fail ninja. 03:40, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Though I might seem dead, I am Immortal. Also even the God of Edits saw ya, So you sir, Are still a Fail Ninja. 04:30, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Though as the servers lag, you were still spotted. A true ninja would even make it though that. 04:45, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

You lied
Because at the top of the page you said you'd reply here, but you responded to Twiggles on his talk page. Shame :/ Oh, and I remember when I joined and you were active. Let's go back to when you were active kay? :D 04:56, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Poke
Hi there Mr. Demented Automaton. How goes thine life? 23:23, October 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll be damned if the world has come to the point where abortion saves lives. If what you tell me is true, sir, then the world cannot exist, as Karl Rove is a very nonaggression and pleasant personality. So, therefore, what you told me cannot be true. 04:41, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Stem cell research (which I support) does not involve abortion. The embryos that are used are not aborted, because they are not in a woman's reproductive tract. Furthermore, you did not address the gay marriage portion. How the hell could gay marriage save someone from cancer? 04:49, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 04:59, October 7, 2011 (UTC)

true yes, it is mainly not needed for npc that own shop or the like but it is very helpfull to have in quests,

i really cant find a suitable page atm but i did run cross lots of pages for example where it said during a quest to talk to a certain npc but i couldnt find that npc anywhere unless i had to run all over the place looking for one.

if im not mistaken it was about finding a quest npc in the dwarven city.

i had no idea where to look for i was right clicking every npc to find out the name so that i could talk to it.

so making it easier for people to add wher specific quets npc that are rarely talked to would be a decent idea.

I love you
06:40, November 24, 2011 (UTC)

the "afk' and "bs"(backstabbing) terms you took off the dictionary where actually slang used very often in rs yet idk why you said otherwise?

Vanity img
Hey Psycho, how are you doing? I decided to post on your talk page about this matter because you were involved with the image policy follow-up. Am I the only one who thinks there is new series of vanity images since a while? There aren't any items like the pith helmet, bowman hat, guthix stole or villager top... but when I see these new images I'm talking about.. I recognize who's in it. They're watermarked. Does the policy dating from 2009 not matter anymore to the current generation of editors or, is there a flaw or am I overreacting? 17:54, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * But the sad thing is that the character is not wearing any items, but the same appearance in hundreds of images e.g. here and here (at the moment of writing)  18:55, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Mr. Psycho Robot, I do hope that in the new year you can stop being psycho, and can become Mr. Normal Robot. 21:41, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * That would be boring. Stay Psycho! :D! 01:22, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good job, Psycho. You totally followed the notice you put at the top of the page by replying on Ty's talk page. 02:01, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Way to tell him d00d. I bet your mum is proud <3 02:13, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Noob
Do you just come back every month for a quick edit, or did you get turned into a zombie? A psychotic zombie veteran homicide robot would be pretty cool, though. Seriously, what do you do? 04:16, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Just why don't you have the time for that? Being nosey is fun, Wiggles. You should try it out more often. Is it something to do with RuneScape itself or other issues? 04:23, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Hello
BABY COME BACK~!

YOU CAN BLAME IT ALL ON HELM~!

BECAUSE HE WAS WRONG~!

something something 01:21, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

hi
so i saw your death threat and wanted to test it out. im waiting. 00:32, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * oh behave 02:41, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I just met you...
...and I do not know who you are, but I will find you, and I will kill you. 13:15, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I know you. 04:28, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Frown.png 04:32, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Psycho do you remember me? Do you?! 04:54, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, sir! I am as evil as they come. Would you mind stepping a bit closer to that reactor shaft? 05:00, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * This reactor shaft. C'mon man, you can't make a Star Wars reference and then reveal yourself to not be a true fan. I'm disappointed. 05:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)