User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

My previous talk is now archived.
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four

RE: Penguin hunting locations checkboxes
Have a look at Distractions and Diversions Locations. Penguin locations can be marked by clicking on rows. The marked rows should save for up to a week. What do you think? -- 15:28, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
I just realized that you've been helping me on the wiki since two years ago. I saw you in my archived talk pages, and wanted to thank you. I was also wondering if you had a custom signature and didn't use it, or just don't have one. If you don't, I'd be glad to make you one.

Anyway, thanks. 19:35, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Nonsense
Oh, I understand it was a legitimate item, but someone just inserting the default page to remove the redlink doesn't help us. IMHO it actually hurts us because people don't say "Oh, that page needs some serious work", they assume its already well established. I'll use a more specific delete reason in the future. -- 21:07, April 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * What can I say, I'm just too lazy to start a page from scratch -- 21:22, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Well, too late.
You're right; it is that simple. But you're too late! I just spent the last 15 minutes or writing a starting post for a new topic.--Agamemnus 03:37, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE:
Hey! What's that thingy about anyways? The letter from Uberfuzzy. I read it fully already. Are we some sort of role model? :P 07:50, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Keeping track of so much stuff
Yeah..I deleted the image not because I thought it did not exist, but because it wasn't used at the moment and it didn't look like it could be used anyway (being small, pixelated, poor-quality). I am quite familiar with all the new Dungeoneering terms though. 13:44, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE:But it is a minigame
It has xp, it has levels, it's a skill. I would not argue with somebody if they said the action of training Dungeoneering was a minigame to an extent, though we cannot deny the fact that it is a skill. 00:09, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

thank you
yo thanks for saying that man... if i was to say that they would just throw me under the bus and say im just trying to "defend myself" or something...

but they seriously get offended over the smallest things and its annoying.

20:35, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Removing cache from IMP
Well, that line was in the policy when it passed consensus... Its not like it was just added. 07:58, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok fair enough. I don't really care. I've adopted DGAF and I've been loving it. 08:21, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape Wiki Family Photo!
(may cause lag)

http://i611.photobucket.com/albums/tt192/ssswizmig/1FamilyPhoto.png 18:09, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

lol
"horrible idea to have twitter crap on the wiki" - Nicely put :) Ajraddatz Talk 20:27, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I second him. 20:28, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

I need your advice
Degen, in less than an hour it will be May 1 in UTC. It will be time to close the voting on May's UOTM. I've written two paragraphs about Rwojy here. I want your opinion on which one I should use. Personally, I favor the first version, since it's much more serious, even though it is filled with meaningless platitudes. However, Rwojy, in his infinite wisdom, asked me to write a humorous version, which is the second one. He has edited it himself, and insists that I use the second version as his UOTM paragraph. What do you think? Thanks, 23:20, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I respected Rwojy's wishes, and used the second one temporarily. Anyone that has anything better to say can replace it if necessary. 01:14, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Merging of the torn bags
I started to undo it but I figured I'd post here first because, who knows, you might convince me. I think that merging the torn bag articles is a really bad idea! Not only is it a complete violation of both the letter and the intent of RS:G, but there's no real reason to do so. In fact I would argue that merging it into the worldbearer articles would make it harder to make use of the information, not easier. If the "this is its only use" argument is enough to merge them, then shouldn't dozens of quest items be merged into their quest articles? This also isn't friendly to future expansion either. What if Jagex changes it so it has more than one use? For example ripping the bag open to get a hide for crafting? We'd have to unmerge them all anyways. It seems to me that this entire thread was all about not doing what you're doing. 04:27, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

deleting clan image
how would we get flooded? i cant even imagine us getting another 25 images if they are allowed, and you can just delete them after the forum discussion is over. the pic is nessary for the discussion, its not like me saying "oh look here my clan owned that clan look at all the images of the war" or anything like that. furthormore, caleb and steler both interacted with it, caleb coming saying images are allowed for forum discussions and steler saying as long as it can be deleted when the discussion is over it can stay. and can you really say that picture had no use to the project? 18:45, May 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * In response to your last question first, I would say that the image is EXTREMELY DETRIMENTAL to the project, it is more kiddie crying bullshit in the cc instead of focusing on articles and REAL wiki projects. So yes, It is absolutely of zero positive use to the project. --Degenret01 00:38, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations on 99 Summoning O_o
Ehh... yeah, I just happened to be scrolling the Fansite Support Thread and saw your avatar... so I clicked it - to your Adventurer's Log. So...

Gratz on 99 Summoning  06:30, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE:
I know. Thanks for the advice. I'm not usually this active at the wiki, and I have a default sig button in my toolbar. Though I can't create a template for each wiki I join because the RS wiki needs it. I'll try to remember to use the default one :). --Tedjuh10 (Talk) 18:08, May 4, 2010 (UTC)