RuneScape:Featured articles/Familiarisation

Familiarisation
this article is well laid out, images in a correct place, tidy, easy to read, i'm not good at describing, just look yourself and you'll understand what im trying to say, It just so tidy!

11:21, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Well set out, lots of useful images to help describe stuff. Not many articles better than this. 10:28, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Support and comment - It is pretty good. Tidy and informative. But I hope you realize that by nomming it so late in the month means it probably won't get featured. Candidates need 7 supporters to be featured. It will be a miracle if you can get 5 more. 02:19, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * We don't go by months any more. 08:41, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh really? Ohhhhhh, that's what it meant by "New format".  04:53, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

 EXTREMELY weak support  - nice article, but it lacks good images.(especially filled with maps) 16:26, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed to Oppose - I h8 long boring lists... 15:36, November 12, 2010 (UTC)

Very strong oppose - Check the requirements out again, especially "well written". No offense, but the opening paragraph is no where up to the quality we like on featured articles. That paragraph is all sentence fragments and tidbits, it lacks any real substance. The rest of the article bounces between well written and more sentence fragments. Lots of pictures, but maybe almost too many. When 2/3 of the article is a list of locations it is informative, but again, not what we like in a well written featured article.--Degenret01 10:55, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per degen. 09:54, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful. 03:26, November 20, 2010 (UTC)