User talk:Ciphrius Kane

This is my talk page, and it be mine. Please direct all threats/complaints here. Send any spam you wish to post here.

F
I r-st, pardon me. 07:30, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * Impressive read! But it doesn't even come close to one of Cook's recommendations on another user talk. It was as long as the American constitution repeated five times! The user practically had to archive ONE post. :P (Don't bother doing that on my talk, it's just...unoriginal.) 11:31, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * It is known to me. I just felt to tell you that it is only amusing the first time someone sees something like that. :3 07:29, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Chat ban
Hmm... i state my proof you ban me, classy. 01:19, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

Now why would she do that? The Other Jonla (talk) 18:37, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

That's true, sisters can be real eejits. The Other Jonla (talk) 20:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
The language is so weird and descriptive in ways people wouldn't want to see. "Disappears into the embrace of death" like really...? 15:56, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good. 15:59, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

RE:Captain Image
Ok, I'll keep a sheet local and I'll keep looking into it. About that templated signature, what do you exactly mean, and how do I do it? 22:56, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Mine's at Template:Signatures/Thojohn22 01:54, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

grats on 99 dung!

 * 3 15:05, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
http://i.imgur.com/2QfrZ.jpg

Hope it's a good one!!! 00:00, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Milk+Puppies!
http://i.imgur.com/Gom7WAo.gif

18:21, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

PoP
Of course I don't mind ;) I did say it in the Summary section, but yes: you are right that I should've said the same on User:Shogo Yahagi's talk page. I reacted on User:AnselaJonla because that was the 2nd post on my talk page about it after reverting it without giving any more information on what would be missing. To that I did not receive any 'content' reaction at all, which seemed strange (especially since I specifically asked him/her - and for a mod/admin to not address that, is even more weird, imo). And yes I do see it as childish, and it may be called that, I think. And yeah, that's it basically. Cos I assume I don't have to explain that it's a little frustrating to have to fix an article because some people don't seem to want to answer you. 18:09, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * I already explained that about Shogo's talk page. I was directly asking her to respond on my question, she didn't & she again reverted my edit -> that's what I called childish... which I also explained. And with regards to me ignoring Shogo, I typed it in the summary bar, where I thought it would reach him/her. Apparently it didn't and if memory serves me well I kinda apologized for that too. 20:35, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have not ignored anything, and frankly, I think you should read my replies better. I have told several times, that no other reasons were given (to me, to my knowledge) than statements "loss of information", when I specifically asked to specify what information is lost. Sure, you may think I'm not entitled to an answer, but that doesn't change the fact that I hadn't seen one until just now. And if you don't mind, I will focus on that next instead to argue with you, which seems utterly pointless now, as the discussion has moved on. I wish you a good night/evening/afternoon/morning or what ever is best applicable in your situation. I'm going to sleep now. Bye, live long and prosper ;) 23:06, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Request
I was hoping you guys would also like to comment on my suggestion, seems only reasonable since this whole dispute involved the interaction with my suggestions in the first place.
 * Thanks ;) 11:22, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

PoP lifeboats
It got updated with Mondays patch (28 Jan), I had 1 lifeboat in store, so I assumed that would be the max now, but it might have been because I have it enabled on all my ships, so I might be wrong on that part. It's being looked into on the talk page now. 23:44, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * From the patch notes: "Players are no longer guaranteed a Player Owned Ports random event reward if they have the maximum amount of a certain type of reward." It seems like they finally fixed it, so you actually can get every reward, not just have 3 rewards not fully maxed and only get those. So they patched it, but not sure how the lifeboats cap works now. 00:00, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

You've been invited to my Max cape party!
''Change of date for Max cape party... please re-read.'' Bren's Max cape Party Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 7:00PM EST World 91 at Varrock East Bank

21:02, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Y u no check links?
Hey, just wanted to say that you forgot to check the links for File:Hunter_kit_new.gif before deleting. (The links might have been fixed by the time you read this.) Next time please don't forget... :)

As per the speedy delete template:
 * This file is a candidate for speedy deletion.
 * Reason:
 * Before deletion, check what links to this page, the page history, and the page log.

Thanks! 00:02, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

in regards to daemoniem bank booth - not too sure on bank removal, but whole clan remembers there being a box there right at beginning - it's where I used to train my woodcutting... just recently back into runescape that I've noticed it gone now.

Tigerkat17

Re:Spec
I added the name of the special attack and the fact that it was discontinued to every image caption. Frankly, a gif didn't really seem cluttering to me, except for maybe one or two exceptions (like dragon longsword). Anyway, sorry for this mess. I'm fixing it atm by de-cluttering special attacks and creating a gallery page. 18:25, February 21, 2013 (UTC)

Don't Blink
Don't blink. Blink and you're dead. They are fast. Faster than you can believe. Don't turn your back. Don't look away. And don't blink. Good Luck. 06:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Family Photo
The 1st of March is coming up. Please do get your image in and linked to on the page. 04:30, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

2013 RSW Family Photo
The 2013 RSW Family Photo is in! Feel free to check it here! See you all again next year, 06:14, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Gloves protection
Oh, I didn't see the filtered edits. Sorry. -- 19:51, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Trans
Erm... Whoops? BrundtBro the Chieftain (talk) 19:09, March 9, 2013 (UTC)

Updated with new information
I understand dwarves commonly hoard gold, the reference I saw was more related to the gold being in the mountain guarded by the dragon. The dwarves (as well as elves and goblins for Mobalising Armies) trying to get to it was only a part of the book, but not the point I was trying to make. Matt 91999 (talk) 23:52, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

proof?
Do you have any proof for allll other possible references? It does not seem very likely to you that the folk belief of evil twins inspired the evil twin random event in the first place?? Don't get me wrong, I admire you standing up for your co-admins, but do so in the bounds of reason. You can accuse me of that Revert-3-times'-commandment, but the other person gave even less reasons to revert my edit in the first place, except of course: the admin badge, which is no reason at all...-- 16:07, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * don't you think that admins should be the first to start talking on talk pages... they have more responsibility, surely...

and if you really think my explanation was too vague, why not make it more clear in stead of deleting it. Clearly my grammar sucks too much to do it anyway. And if you really think that my explanation is too vague don't you then also thing that her solution was even vaguer and sucky-er? simply adding  to the flavour text. And.. again... it seems there is no proof for all the other flavour texts either... are you going to delete those too?? and yes that admin thingy was used. if I revert I get warnings if that admin reverts it's fine, also with insults.

"(Undid revision 7894442 by Leon Art (Talk) leave it as this)" sounds as if it's said with some authority... but I agree.. there's no proof that this implied proof is is necessarily adminship. I guess I have a thing for seeing concrete things in actual vague things. and saybing "your grammar sucks" does indeed make me want to defend myself explain myself/be reactionary, if you guys see that as "just attacking anybody who disagrees with you" then idk what I have to say to you guys besides: your reasoning sucks. -- 16:49, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * You know if some-one is not being nice, it's hard to assume good faith and it's also a violation of the Three-revert rule, I'm sure you understand why my patience can run out. 17:48, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Armadyl
I'm not sure exactly where... but I have a strong memory of it... it might also be from a-canonical sources, like the god letters... but certainly it's Justice in stead of Law... One moment, pls, I will try to find the source of that Surpreme Justice... 16:51, April 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmm.. RS's official wiki isn't a reliable source, right? http://services.runescape.com/m=rswiki/en/Special:History?topicVersionId=132326&topic=Armadyl
 * Btw, what is that symbol?? 16:58, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Mr. Know-it-all
Nope, dw, if I ever change gender it will be a biggie :3 19:18, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * For all I know... since today ;)- 21:55, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

About my ban
Lately I noticed that I have got banned of the chat, well, of course we don't always agree with eachother, but I honestly think that my ban is not justifiable, I really did not know that I was offending you, I conclude that you were offended because you were the only one negatively responding to my behaviour, but however I think that a warning would have been in place. Of course you may say you have warned me, but you did not warn me for the behaviour you banned me for.

Therefore I think that you should give me just another chance.

Yours sincerly,

13:18, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Joost985.

Your arguments were not supported by any facts, therefore they are not reasonable so that makes them no more than moral arguments, and those are not the strongest.

I think it is ridiculous to ban one for what he is not conscious of.

Yours... 13:31, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Your definition of racist is totally abject, when I say "Hitler is a good speecher" you kick me right away, I'm sorry but I have not said anything about Hitler's ideology, Lenin was a good speecher, how can I say that? They're both the ideological opposites of eachother, exactly, hope you get my point now. And if you sneakily watched my private chat, which is totally wrong, you probably interpretated me incorrectly, if so, I apologise, but if not so, you are very wrong.

Ya.. 13:45, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

At least explain how THAT is racist?

13:55, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

The only thing I actually (indirectly) said about islamic terrorists is that they exist. Do you deny their existance?

y 14:10, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

That is 100% your own interpretation, I didn't even think of blowing anything up on saying that, I thought about the person of islamic terrorist. I bet you did not even consider unbanning me while I'm making good points here. If you considered this in banning me, think once more. I really would appreciate that.

14:25, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Now, you banned me, how long does it last? One week I guess?

19:51, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

RE:
Okey, thanks for the tip :) -- 16:26, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Do me a favour and unblock me from your private messages. This lack of communication is not a good idea. 06:15, May 7, 2013 (UTC)

Admin bullying

 * I replaced the profile image for Saradomin with a more recent once that showed more of his face than the previous image. AnselaJonla quickly reverted the edit and ordered me to find the citation and source for the image before he would allow it to remain.


 * I spent 20 minutes trying to find what he asked me to find. When I finally provided him with what he asked for, he eventually realized that  I was right , so he quickly changed his opinion and said that he didn't like the image. But if he didn't like it, why did he make me jump through all these hoops to begin with? That was very unprofessional.


 * He saw the image before he asked me to do all of that. I find that was very unprofessional of AnselaJonla to make me do 20 minutes of research just to wave it away when he got in a bad mood. Would it be possible for some form of action to be taken against AnselaJonla for doing this? The conflict can be found on the page's edit history and our talk pages. Thank you.

- Lord Dion Magnan of Entrana 00:16, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Out of sheer curiosity, why did you mention that she is your girlfriend? - Lord Dion Magnan of Entrana 00:24, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

If you are not neutral, you need to leave the conversation. 00:28, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Stop it
00:31, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

I am back
I thought of what u said, and I took a long break as you wished, and I am back. I can see Things have been straightened out now, and worked out I hope, (though Wished for other things, oh well.) I thank you for siding with me in the problem in the past, I will consider you as a friend as well.Kinglink15 (talk) 20:54, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * AWESOME! welcome back friend, missed you ;) 20:55, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

re: vendettas
that hot air does not deserve a reply 19:10, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * yes. 19:22, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have. What you are saying is blatantly not true -- but naturally, as you think that you are the one being persecuted, you won't see it as such. 19:28, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Please calm down and stop harassing other users. There aren't any angry reanimated fossils here (just a harmless fish), and this angry outpouring is unnecessary and not helpful to anyone. If the entire ordeal with Ansela has upset you this much, then maybe you should consider taking a short, self-enforced break yourself to cool off. Thanks in advance, 20:15, June 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * You are being unnecessarily conflictive, and apparently cannot see it for yourself. You are angry and it is affecting your judgement, so please, for everyone's sake as much as your own, take a few days to cool off. 20:43, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Hi
http://i.imgur.com/1R3LbuW.png

Hi!
Hi, can you please clarify the reason for my ban, if you're not able to I'll be forced to report this to your superiors Naohiro Takahashi (talk) 18:07, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the help with the vandal :3 10:34, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ciphrius Kane,

Thanks for the helpful messages. I didn't understand how to delete an old image and substitute a new one.

But you've deleted the new image with the attack styles. The one you put back has a "controlled" image at the top right. Is that correct? Can you attack him with any style?

If so, thanks for the edit.

There's also an image of the "controlled" dummy which I tried to delete but wasn't able to. Just as well, then :-)

- FaulchenFaulchen (talk) 22:29, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

PS: I keep getting told I didnt sign but I did try toFaulchen (talk) 22:29, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

Challem
Could you unprotect Challem please? He should have an article per RS:G, obviously without the blatant speculation and nonsense. 18:12, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Never mind. 20:14, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Fifth Age religion
We'll just have to wait until 2014 to find out ;) 06:48, July 13, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Your forum
I wouldn't call it a personal preference. I just didn't want to label it a 'project' because that's not exactly what it is. I was simply offering a new way of dealing with a certain issue that's prevalent. Although I do understand now that wasn't the place. Instead of a preference I would've called it a methodology. Something that could've easily been included here -- 00:28, July 14, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Upload Bug
Yes, I'm aware of the bug. I just wanted to check if reverting to the "trouble upload" would fix the problem. I'm positive I uploaded the right thing. The real problem is that I transed a lot of those pictures and deleted them from my computer. A lesson learned. P.S. For some reason, pressing ~ outputs this: &#123;&#123;SUBST:Nosubst&#124;Signatures/Joel amos&#125;&#125; (talk) 00:14, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

I'll just use the template for now:

Thought you might like...
10:55, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

Personal Attacks
Please stop with your subtle personal attacks towards me. They have been going on since the first thread regarding Ansela was created, and I am really tired of it. You said I had deluded myself into thinking I was friends with Ansela, and now you are saying that I hate her and have a facade. Let me be very clear: I do not hate Ansela. I do not have a facade to cover up lies and deceit. I am not faking my cheerfulness. I don't know where you got this information from, but your confidant is wrong. If you have a problem with me, come to me first rather than gossip about me in the chat. You taking out your anger on me is getting really old. 06:32, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

You're invited to my trim party!
Find out the details here. --BrenRS (talk) 02:29, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Zamorak
This is about the Zamorak edit warring.

He was known as "the Scourge" when he was working for Zaros, not afterwards. It even states that at the beginning of the article. As for the wilderness, Forinthry no longer belonged to Zaros so it wasn't anyone's empire, just a large continent. He tore it apart so it's just more proof that destruction is part of his philosophy, it also states this in the article. (Check it if you don't believe me.) 01:42, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Userbox/runningoutofideas
Yes, please do move it. I should have made it there to begin with. Sorry.

. 19:04, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

Re:ason
Sorry, but I deemed that case too obvious to state a reason. "reason" is the default when the speedy d template is placed using the newish dropdown menu, and I didn't bother changing it to "unnecessary", "...", "no explanation needed", "duplicate", "feeble image", ..... 20:39, August 4, 2013 (UTC)

Latest edit on Great Orb Project article, about mention of w61
Hei. : ) I understand that folks think it's an unhelpful addition to the article if they aren't familiar with the world of GOP. I have explained the reasoning behind re-adding the mention of w61 into the article in the discussion page, here: http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:The_Great_Orb_Project#Mention_of_W61. I hope we can come to an agreement. Timome (talk) 00:11, August 5, 2013 (UTC)

Upload Bug
Yeah yeah, I'm well aware, thought I'd try to see if it was fixed in case the RS:BUG page is outdated; uploading it again has worked for me in the past. (Didn't upload an image for a while though.) 21:30, August 5, 2013 (UTC)

Bullshit.
Apparently the word "yank" is allowed on chat. So mods and admins like you who just ban people because they don't like them or they personally don't like what they say, even when It's true. Apparently I'm banned for "disruptive behavior." because I'm complaining some users said America football is a "yank perversion." and apparently you agree with that and don't like I'm complaining about it. So I don't have a right to complain about some British girl calling me a yank? Real smart.

Do you know what the word yank means? I'm pretty sure you do. It's a shortened variation of the derogatory term "yankees." that are used against Americans. You just bullshitted me the whole time and say, "Oh stop complaining and you're gonna get banned."

Not to mention before you kicked me because the same user says how my username is a lie and then she starts this whole crap and you decide to kick me, WHEN I DIDN'T EVEN START IT AND SHE WAS THE FIRST PERSON TO BRING IT UP. You just took the whole situation ONE-SIDED and you stood beside HER, when she was the one who started everything! You didn't even bother once to look at what I was saying except to say a tons of times, "Stop 'disrupting' the chat or you're one step from getting banned!", blah blah blah.

This is why society is crap. If someone doesn't like what you say even If It is the truth, they automatically hate you and ban you or whatever, just because they don't like you or what you said.

I swear, mods and admins in Wikia are just as bad, if not worse, then the ones on IGN's Forums.

Oh oh, so you're gonna block me now for "attacking an adminstrator." or some other ignorant excuse because you just don't like what I'm telling you, even If It's the truth?

Just send this to Wikia Staff. I hope they're not as close-minded as you moderators and admins who always go freaking one-sided, just because you don't like that user or what they say. You know It's true, or else you would have been listening to what I was saying.

Stop drinking the haterade and start drinking the bubble tea! http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/battlefield/images/thumb/4/47/Chao1.jpg/50px-Chao1.jpg 12:07, August 12, 2013 (UTC)

So just let it slide, huh? Just let people talk shit and let it slide, huh?

That's bullshit and YOU KNOW IT, man.

This wiki needs to change policy for stuff like that. You can't just let people talk crap about other people or whatever and just let it slide like that.

You know what that shows? That you tolerate bad behavior and rather just move on and let it continue in the future, than confront it and let them pay the consequences so they wont say messed up crap like that AGAIN.

How would you feel if you were in my shoes if someone was discriminating on you based on your interests or nationality or whatever it may be, and the moderators just sat there and did nothing to that person and rather move on, but instead punishing YOU of complaining when you have the right to do so because of what that person originally said?

Get what I mean?

It's whatever, man. I know stuff like that ain't gonna change, but still sucks ass. It kinda reminds me of law and stuff.

I understand It's your responsibility and you have to follow Wiki Policy, but It's pretty bullshit, in my opinion and It's just the "easy way out."

Stop drinking the haterade and start drinking the bubble tea! http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/battlefield/images/thumb/4/47/Chao1.jpg/50px-Chao1.jpg 12:32, August 12, 2013 (UTC)

If what you say above is true then some new admins are needed. Admins with a neutral point of view and as little bias as possible. 07:35, August 13, 2013 (UTC)

Because of the previous textwall
I am going to spam you for no apparent reason, actually. π. 12:21, August 13, 2013 (UTC)

Found one!
Yesterday, you asked if there were any black Assassin's, and I said no there aren't, but I was wrong. Connor's mentor is black, and he was an assassin in his youth. Dogfoger (talk) 11:58, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Surula
She didn't do that the first couple of months after PoP release... -- 18:39, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

Well, forgive me for not being a perfect English speaker/typer but I'm not a native speaker. For me, I wrote it fine: I described the previous situation + added the new change. 19:08, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

To me... what you said/typed is less clear, less informative, and could even be read as if it gives an extra new voyage even if the thrid slot is empy. But if this how native speakers undestand it... okay :-/ 10:13, September 20, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Counter vandalism
I usually only report users if their vandalism is excessive in a certain way; such as the mass of it in this case, or the repetition of his edits. Other than that, I'll just revert vandalism and be done with it. I'm just here as a user, and as I've said before: I'm not going to spend time issuing warnings; I leave that up to those with more experience or powers/responsibilities. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 04:54, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Sirenic Armour
My bad about the armour. I was confused when comparing the armours (I was the IP address that edited the first time, forgot to log in). I was unsure if it was still the the best because I didn't know if it was counted by defensive status, level or hp bonus, so I decided to revert my edits, just incase, but guess I was right about that. 22:21, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

Looks good
What do you think? 07:42, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

Revised
Why did you remove the kharshai part of The Godless? Toni-124 (talk) 22:35, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

Revised
again why did u remove my godless bit off the guthixian page? Toni-124 (talk) 22:36, October 28, 2013 (UTC)

Zamorak's tier
I couldn't agree more :(  12:28, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, but I don't disagree about the format; Leon is just adding things that aren't true (giving a post-BoL tier to his BoL form - that's like giving a post-death tier to Guthix) and starts this bureaucratic drama each time I revert something, which I'm sick of. 12:31, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * You should watch the RuneFest thingy with the lore (forgot what they called it). They clearly say both Saradomin and Zamorak were tier 4 before BoL, after BoL Sara increase by 1 tier, Zammy dropped one. I added a source too, you should check it. It also have nice concept art, I'm sure you'll like it. ;) 13:08, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Because I figured an edit summary boiling down to "this is nonsense" would be sufficient. Clearly I was wrong. Also, I'm not the one repeatedly re-adding stuff without a reason - stuff which was reverted (that's usually a sign something's wrong with it). Don't worry though - I'll make sure to leave an intricate message on someone's talk next time and ask them to have a good look at whatever it is they added and revert it themselves. (sounds sarcastic, doesn't it? I mean it though. :P) 12:38, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have asked you to do this before (to go to my talk page when I'm in the mids of making multiple edits in a row to one page), if memory suits me well. And just a while ago, I asked you again, but you acted as if you didn't read it. Also I would say that saying "this is nonsense" doesn't really give me any information why it is nonsense. It would be better to say why it is nonsense, or to at least refer to a source that shows me it's nonsense. 13:08, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Because I did not notice Fswe's reverts until I added "Added proper tiers" in the description box, when you look at the history page of Zamorak, you can see that I had some... difficulties with the proper way of writing some of the code. I'm not that good at it as Fswe. He can change it successfully in one go, while I sometimes still make small mistakes (maybe partly because of my dyslexia, idk). So when I was busy editing, I think I must have just missed his edits, I also don't check my e-mail notifications or the history pages in between edits.  14:15, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree. I did not commit an edit war. I was busy doing edits, and Fswe got in between them, and edit war is reverting some-one else's edits on purpose, I did it by accident. I contacted Fswe after I noticed the page was locked. 14:15, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Zamorak switch template
Well I think we could just as well skip that whole image, actually. He basically looks the same, except for... well, his kamehameha. Saradomin has a switch template too, but he has a rather different look, while Zamorak doesn't... well maybe slight details. I don't think it's even necessary, but there as some talk that basically lead to the standard vs giant thing. IF there should be a switch template thing at all... I think it's better to use his God form (BoL/BotD) and his Mahjarrat form (as seen at the Captured temple statue). But I fear this would be even less popular  13:16, November 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * You are correct there are some important changes. The Gaint is how he really looks, as seen at the BoL, the Standard version was just a memory, the statue may be... completely incorrect. I think, for correctness sake, we would need to change Standard to Hreidmar's Memory (or just BotD or Birthright of the Dwarves).  14:19, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * I totally forgot about that one! Great call :3 Indeed, that one is probably the best to use: no incorrect memory distortions, no problem with the size. And similar solution as we had with Saradomin. Yuo're awesome :3 I take it you want to use only one image now? With the Statue, Memory and BoL just being seen later in the article (or even only in the gallery)? 14:26, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Timeline
Thor 1 takes place at the same time as Iron Man 2, right? Coulson left Black Widow to watch over Tony while he went to New Mexico with Hawkeye? 19:47, November 5, 2013 (UTC)

Bandos' trivia
What do you mean? 06:43, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not making an argument for it, I just wonder, why it would be bad to show people other things with similar names or... histories, even if it hasn't been an inspiration.

...but since you asked:

Zanik:
 * The word Zanik has various meanings in different languages.
 * In Dutch her name means nag (with the infinitive being zaniken).
 * In Polish it means atrophy and/or disappearance.
 * In Czech it means death, destruction and/or extinction. Arguably more fitting translations that the former, although it is not clear if this was intended by Mod John A.

Tuska:
 * The word "Tuska" translates to "pain" or "agony" in Finnish. This, along with the association of a tusked, ravaging beast, were the inspiration for her name.

Probably many more.

All of these are not the original inspiration, but I think it's interesting to know, allbeit trivial. 07:05, November 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * sigh... I really dislike those rules :(  07:21, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

ambiguity?
are you being serious?? the elves cosntantly refer to her as crystal, before the Zaros podcast it no-other character in came was describe as crystal (besides, maybe the Light creatures). So, what would count as unambiguous, then. In your book. Only if they will confirm it by name, or would you say something like "Well there could also be another god by the same name... after all, there are about 20 gods in the RuneScape story".
 * What about the things on the luchador mask nowhere is said explicitly that "La Diosa de Cristal" = Seren, the Goddess of the Elves that live in Tirannwn and have an emissary near/at Port Sarim. Yet... we still say it is.. What about "El Hombre Verde"/The Green man, that could well refer to Guthix, but it's ambiguous on its own, it could also refer to Brassica Prime, or Bandos, or even a mere mortal Goblin... When is it ambiguous, when is it clear an when is it just plain nitpicking? PLEASE provide me with a proper unambigous standard that I can use to do any edit on wikia at all. 13:33, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Just popped by to tell you: you guys were right, he was joking... he shouldn't do that in FAQs :( Regardless, you were right ;) 22:28, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

revdel
Why are you revdel'ing edits with links to a website that doesn't exist? It's really not that hard to check this sort of thing.