RuneScape:Featured images/archive-delisting

TzTok-Jad
Reason: - Breaks the guideline: The image is taken from RuneScape game client.


 * Support Neutral - Tollerach made a good point. I support delisting after replacement images are chosen. And was the guideline made after featuring? 22:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The criteria listed have not been put through consensus or otherwise approved by anyone other than AZ. Besides, all of the images I submitted which have been supported unanimously do not meet the current criteria. 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ample time was given to discuss the criteria for nomination. I just assumed that since no one actually bothered to discuss this, I took the initiative of finalising the criteria.  If you wish, please discuss this specific criterion in the talk page.  13:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The guidelines were put in place to get this up and running. I disagree with this guideline at this time.  Until we have several good game client images, I say we leave these images in. Besides, they look good.  23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Once we have more ingame images, then it can come down. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Guthix
Reason: - Breaks the guideline: The image is taken from RuneScape game client.


 * Support Neutral - Tollerach made a good point. I support delisting after replacement images are chosen. And was the guideline made after featuring? 22:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The criteria listed have not been put through consensus or otherwise approved by anyone other than AZ. Besides, all of the images I submitted which have been supported unanimously do not meet the current criteria. 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ample time was given to discuss the criteria for nomination. I just assumed that since no one actually bothered to discuss this, I took the initiative of finalising the criteria.  If you wish, please discuss this specific criterion in the talk page.  13:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The guidelines were put in place to get this up and running. I disagree with this guideline at this time.  Until we have several good game client images, I say we leave these images in. Besides, they look good.  23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I must admit, its a good image. Leave it until we have more ingame images. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Avatar of Creation(1)
Description: A battle for the Avatar of Creation at Soul Wars. Reason: Too cluttered with players, the health bars and various prayers don't look good.

12:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support deletion - As nominator. 01:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Opose deletion - It's one of the best images i've seen :)
 * Oppose - This picture isn't just about the Avatar, but it helps. We get a nice view of the Avatar, as well as the chaos of Soul Wars; and it's not like the HP bars are taking up the majority of the screen. Admittedly, it is a tiny bit cluttered with the Prayers and HP Bars, but not to the point where it detracts from the image immensely. -- [[Image:Dragon two-handed sword.png|Beware the underrated.]] Pikaandpi  Berserker Fury![[Image:Bandoschestplate.gif|Hit hard or go home.]]‎ 14:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If a replacement image is found, the image can be nominated under "Nominations to replacement"
 * Support replacement - If you can find a tie Soul Wars world, I'm sure you can find one that isn't so cluttered. [[Image:Saradomin sword.PNG|25px]]    Tehnoobshow101  18:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm free-to-play. 05:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Support replacement - If a better photo is taken I support replacement.-- 19:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Image has been nominated for replacement.  09:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

TzTok-Jad (2) and Guthix (2)


Previous nomination: See above.

Reason: These images were not taken from RuneScape game client, and are used under "Fair use". These were one of the first few images to be featured on the Main Page. Now that we have about 30+ images, I think it is time that we removed them.


 * Support - as nominator. 16:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Jad, Neutral about Guthix - I never liked Jad's image anyways. You can't even see him very well. The Guthix image is nice (maybe replace it with an image of Guthix during Meeting History?). 17:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If you have the image, please nominate it in "Nominations for replacement". Thanks. 17:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nominator; they really were only kept as there wasn't many featured images at the time. Now there's more we should apply the rules to them, and delist them. 18:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Both - Finally!
 * Support both - per Azliq. 08:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - per nom. 10:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both Sorry, but they were always a bit... I dunno. They just didn't seem well. Especially Guthix.
 * Support both - For the reason explained in the description
 * Support both - Per nom. 00:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nom. 18:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nom. 07:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Both images are delisted from the Featured images list. 20:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Zanik
Reason: In my opinion, the image doesn't diserve to have a place in the first page...The quality seems like its 2nd category.


 * Support - As nominator
 * Weak Support - It's true, the quality of this picture can't match the quality of the others now, but I still <3 Zanik. 13:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but the image criteria is only about quality,size etc ...If you love or not the npc does not metter for the voting and it will take as a comment.
 * Actually, I'm still supporting the nomination, and I'm STILL commenting on the bad quality. If I'm SUPPORTING you, and just made it weak (as if it won't be delisted, look at the support already), there's no need to flip out. Again.
 * Gosh I am not fliping out, I was only informing...
 * Support - To be honest, I was contemplating nominating it myself. We have a lot more featured images now which I feel greatly exceed this image in quality. 14:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - ITS HORRIBLE. Yuck! 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - As said before, it lacks the large quality and detail than the other images. When you look at this, the first word in your mind will most likely not be "wow!" 15:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It will be "eek!" 15:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I never really liked it anyway. She looks scary! 19:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - It doesn't look good on main page, I don't think any npc chatheadi image ever will look good on main page. Secondly I don't even think that it's so good image, that deserves nomination of Featured Image. 07:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If a guy that plays wow or some oter game like that opens runescape wiki and see this image it will certanly say: omfg runescape realy sucks 11:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Image is delisted from the Featured images list. 18:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Brassica Prime
Description: All hail Brassica Prime!

Reason: It shows the size of the cabbage god compared to the player but the colours are a bit dull and dead.

Old nomination - Found here.


 * Support Delisting - As nominator. -- 16:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - It's a pointless picture, it's just a huge cabbage and a player with some sparkles. >_>
 * Support Delisting - It should be removed from the featured images but not from the wiki, because it is a discontinued event. 17:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Per Requiem and Gragon. --George10 98 04:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Per Requiem, pointless image. 08:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * support delisting - Per all... and the player ruins it 08:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just a note to you all. Most of the images here don't really have any point, featured images are chosen based on image quality. 08:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Its not that great an image, and as said before, seeing the player there ruins it 14:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination for delisting is successful. 14:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Dagganoth Prime
Reason The picture is taken from the runescape website (the original uploader of this picture didn't take the picture, he "robbed" from Jagex) and the Dagganoth claw looks blured.

Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1


 * Check http://www.runescape.com/c=3ZuvmPJsjJc/kbase/guid/waterbirth_island_dungeon_members
 * Support - As Nominator  18:08, September 6, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nobody own anything in this wiki. Instead of saying "owner of this picture" it would be better to say the original uploader.
 * The blurry part could be my fault, since I touched up the transparency when I cropped the image. 09:39, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per nominator, monster images are boring - also, you misspelled 'robbed' in the reason section.
 * Comment - Lol im portuguese... so my english sucks a little. :D 09:25, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * It's cool, just always looking out for my Wikians ^w^


 * Support - Looks pretty bad, and that's not surprising since it came from the Knowledge Base! 00:22, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - It's from the Knowledge Base! 03:03, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Muzzy - -- 03:36, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per nom. 16:07, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Oli. 14:23, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't see why we have to wait like 6 days to get this removed from featured images, it MUST be deleted without a nomination for delisting. This is just my opinion and I think it should be like that. 02:07, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't really like monster images, I think only pictures of scenery should be FIMG. -- 18:43, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination for delisting is successful. 07:22, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Fishing Guild
Reason - This image isn't really scenery, it's not of a boss monster, but it's a dock with players fishing in it. I don't like this image, as it doesn't show anything epic like the dragon forge, or anything like that. It's basically just some dock with players fishing. You can't even tell it's the Fishing guild. Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1


 * Support As nom. -- 18:52, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - There's more to RuneScape than monsters and ancient ruins. This picture is a very nice picture of the communal aspect to the game. 19:45, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Although this picture isn't the best, it captures the community of RS at it's best, something some pictures can't do.
 * Oppose - It's lovely. 15:47, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose - I really like it. It isn't the very best picture in terms of beauty, but it captures the daily lives of many players, and it shows what most people do on RuneScape, which is training their skills and making money. 15:55, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I really like the rich shade of blue, it's what makes it a nice picture. 21:57, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination for delisting is unsuccessful.  11:49, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Gu'tanoth
Reason: This image is rather dull, it doesn't really show anything either. All it is is dead colours mixed with more dead colours.

Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive2


 * Support - As nom. 21:57, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - There's a huge void of action and content right in the center of the image, and it isn't very pleasing to look at. 02:48, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I like this image as it looks very relistic and shows off RuneScape's grahics. 14:52, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * How does it remotely look realistic? And how does it show off the graphics? This is a horrible example of how good RuneScape graphics are. 23:08, September 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - Per nominator. 16:45, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Quoting Pika: we need some more pictures of different races across RuneScape (aside from some Humans in most of our featured images, the Goblins in the Chosen Commander Image, and various enemies throughout many of our screens, we lack different races). I agree wholeheartedly. I don't agree that this image is dull, it has some nice detail and is overall, a very interesting picture. 11:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's just awesome to look at. It's better than most location images... . 10:19, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
 * Then why Oppose? Maybe I'm not getting the sarcasm...? 15:21, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * He's opposing it being delisted i.e. supporting it remaining listed. 17:49, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes lol sorry didn't read the "nominations for delisting" thing. 01:04, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Support - I don't really know. There's the fact that it's dull and the ogres look like their really tired and CBA'ed to do anything. But then there's the fact that having pictures of monsters in their habitats are good...
 * Notice of intent - Nomination for delisting is extended by a week to 28 September 2009. 12:17, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I can't see what is wrong with it. It is a good image of Ogres. 08:05, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's perfectly fine. 15:39, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - It seems pretty good.. 18:35, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination for delisting is unsuccessful.  06:59, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Bandos' throne room
Reason: One thing ruins this picture for me. Zanik. She is on of the most well known, favorite NPCs in RuneScape, but her graphics let her down. Untill she gets her graphics update, she will ruin this picture, as she sticks out. If anyone finds a image of this place without Zanik, we can use it to replace this one. She just sticks out like a sore toe.

Previous nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive3


 * Support - As nominator. 08:15, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support - Though I like the area and Zanik looks like a yellow and brown dot on thumbnail, dots can be evil >:D OMG!!!!! --> . -- 11:10, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I agree, I don't like this picture greatly, for a featured image... and yes, Zanik sticks out, just too much.
 * Support - I dnno, I just don't like it... -- 03:09, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - ...what's happening? A goblin standing on a statue. Hoo-ray. 23:45, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Its very unattractive 22:15, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't like it. It's just some pixels (it looks very pixelated) with some different colours and a blob of some other colours in the middle. 22:16, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't like it either 22:39, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Who even nominated this -.- It's horrible -- 03:31, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hapi did -- 19:48, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * No need to point fingers, we all have the right to our opinion. 20:50, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just telling missy who nominated the original; by the way, that was a unanimous decision -- 22:14, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * I was talking to the both of you somewhat To Missy, saying that is kinda rude to the person who nominated it, and to Porp, that's kinda rude to say it out loud (however, you wouldn't have said it in the first place if Missy hadn't asked ). No big deal.  04:08, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * When I nominated it, a long time ago, the image was way darker, and it all looked much more spectacular. Someone made it brighter, and actually ruined it. . 15:53, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Here's a sxier image. -- 02:36, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * AMG YES. 04:08, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * YES! FTW! -- 19:35, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * CHEESE PUFFS!!!!! (and yes)-- 01:38, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Delisted. 02:38, December 1, 2009 (UTC)