User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five (5 and 6 cross some)
 * Six
 * Known I.P.s I have had. Special:Contributions/216.136.67.224

Look, I have already been spammed. SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM

First!
Sorry, couldn't resist. 01:52, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * THANKYOUFORYOURKINDWORDSOFENCOURAGEMENT. (MYCAPSLOCKANDSPACEBARAREINFACTBROKEN)  14:08, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Parsonsda
I don't mind the work. I figure if you can block someone without enough certainty that you can type up 9001 paragraphs justifying it, then you shouldn't have blocked them in the first place. I still find it pretty annoying that this whole process seems to have been derailed by three letters which were probably an arbitrary choice in the original IMP. I didn't figure that anyone would make that hard-line distinction, since it doesn't make logical sense in context. That said, I also realise that I can't use what I find logical to block people, when a policy does explicitly, if not intentionally, state differently. Given this loophole, I can see no recourse than to unblock him, despite the fact that I know at no point did he read the IMP and think "hey, this only says fansites. guess youtube videos are ok!" I know he either just forgot, or didn't think he would face consequences again. 20:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE:AGF
Kk, won't happen again ;)

22:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

cvu
I'm going to be off for 1:30h, so I can't antivandalise, so please block the vandals at RuneScape:Counter-Vandalism_Unit asap. Thanks, 13:16, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:gilded pickaxe
If your inteligence isn't high enough to know the image is kept on a cache and you can upload a separete file named "Guilded Dragon Pickaxe Equipped, then don't even bother to annoy me with a trivial argument 21:53, May 16, 2011 (UTC)