RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Archive 2

Emosworld
Emosworld has made many contributions and created many pages, complete with images. I think he has put a lot of effort into the wiki and helped it. He would do very good as an administrator. He deserves it Ilyas--Ilyas 17:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Support --◙▲╛Whiplash ◙▲╛ 19:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Not yet Too soon, and I believe we have enough administrators!  Dreadnought talk 05:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, that might be true. After all, you said the same thing to me! He he! But don't you think he's ready, if there weren't enough administrators? Well, it's not my choice, only my opinion. Ilyas

I agree, I am too new. Maybe in a month or so. Anyway, thank you Ilyas! 01:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, you make lots of good contribs and you have composed lost of good pages. But, maybe not yet. Oh, this was here for over a month and a half I believe amd I didn't tell you, sorry.21:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Na, don't worry. 20:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll probably sign up around Feb/March. Emosworld 06:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Whiplash
Whiplash has been here for quite a while, he's active,done a lot of work, and has a positive attitude towards the wiki, and all of it's helpers. I think he would make a great administrator.  Dreadnought talk 07:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I quite agree. After Whip, though, if the vote is passed, perhaps we should put a hold on new admin requests/nominations. We have quite a few of them, you know? Oddlyoko 07:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I checked to see how many we have..for a wiki this size we probably only needed 10..One more could do though.. [[Image:Purple party hat.PNG|16px]] Dreadnought talk 08:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  09:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - I thought she already was! --Eucarya 10:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Note im a He not a She. --◙▲╛Whiplash ◙▲╛ 12:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, you didn't actualy tell us that XD :) JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  12:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well shame on me then. --◙▲╛Whiplash ◙▲╛ 12:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If I don't hear a "no" vote by tuesday, whiplash will be made a sysop. --Eucarya 23:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * ...Yes...Or if you want it the proper way...Support... Huanghe63 talk 00:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * User "Whiplash" is now a sysop --Eucarya 00:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Ilyas
I have only been in the wiki for a couple months, maybe 2 or 3, but i enjoy editing the information in it. There are some articles that really need to be edited and need help. I'll be glad to share some of what I have learned from being an active RuneScape member on these articles. I haven't made as many edits as some people have but I think i did a good job on what i have done. I will be happy to take on the duties of an administrator and will not be upset if I do not make it.Ilyas


 * Support it is true you are a great help to the wiki and I would not hesitate to make you an admin (if I could). However we have a lot of admins already but definatly when we need another you'll be the first on our minds. --◙▲╛Whiplash ◙▲╛ 23:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Not yet: I've just looked through your recent edits, and really you haven't done enough yet to be considered. Keep up the work though, and I'll change my vote =)  --Eucarya 00:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No not ready, haven't been doing much lately. :( Keep up the work though! [[Image:Purple party hat.PNG|16px]] Dreadnought talk 02:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions. I will be sure to keep on trying and make more edits. One day maybe... Ilyas
 * Hm..you might want to work on spelling to..Hehe. [[Image:Purple party hat.PNG|16px]] Dreadnought talk 02:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Errr... ya ok I'll be sure to do that to...(?) Might have been a typing error.Ilyas
 * I don't suppose I'm ready yet, am I? --Ilyas 20:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep working youre close but not exactly ready yet. --Whiplash 22:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I think I've made enough edits and good ones. I think I'm active. No, I'm not impatient, I just need to know what you guys think...--Ilyas 16:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Ilyas (2)

 * I believe we can re-open your nomination but I have one suggestion before we should make you an admin if you see a page with minor content dont auto put a vfd on it try to expand it, unless the page reads something like "Almara is a person" dont delete it. Anyways that's my opinion though getting votes may take awhile Good Luck =). --Whiplash 19:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Support Has done some good work, deserves this. Good lck with the other votes. cheers, 19:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Follow my advice o.O. --Whiplash 19:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Was thinking this a few days back, but lag prevented me, then I forgot. :) JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  19:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Quite a lot of good editing on the Wiki. Keep up the good work! Chaoticar 20:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know yet, probably yes but I have to think about it. Thanks guys for voting for me but I have to think about it. Yes, I will most likely say yes but its a big responsibility. Vimes contacted me in game and told me to check the page. I knew what it was right away. But ill have to be prepared before I take on the job. I am not the most active person here, I only use the computer on Tuesdays, Saturdays and Sundays the time I am on might be different from some of you, U.S Central. But, for now, I'll try to make up my mind by Sunday or Saturday. Thanks for your votes. Remember, crats, this isn't a yes yet.22:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes! Alright, I thought it over! Guess what I'm gonna say, go right ahead, guess, Hit me with it. And I Definitely won't do what Shadowdancer did! Go right ahead Crats, I'm ready.00:37, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * First, before that, is anyone else going to vote because I don't want to rush this if someone disagrees.02:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * We should probably leave it for a bit to make sure we get everyone's votes. How does Sunday after the meeting sound? :) Oh, and stop talking about Shadowdancer. It gets kinda repetitive. Anyone would think he's the only admin to have abused his powers, ever... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  07:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * ya, well It says on his talk page "I vow to use my powers for evil and not good, I mean good and not evil" so its kinda funny.22:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If vimes is happy with it, I'm happy too - Support --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 16:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I just need some more people like Dreadnought and others to vote.21:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * We have more than enough votes. I want vimes to make you an admin though, cos I don't think he's promoted anyone before and I want to make sure he knows how lol.  If I don't see him on tomorrow I'll do it myself. --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 21:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That was easier than I thought. Ilyas is now a sysop. 21:57, 20th Jan 2007 JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 21:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Vimes! I vow to use my powers for Good and not evil! 22:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, when was I sysopped? I want to put the time on my page, if you can't get exact time, don't feel I'm pushing you, but can I have the date at the least?23:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC

User:ToaBionicle
 * llyas Go! llyas Go! llyas Go!

No's (De-Sysops)
Okay a bit late but..This is me, I don't know about any of you, but Ilyas has 209 main space edits..Has it occurred to any of you that other users would be more fit for administrative duties. I mean..He is ranked 28 of all users, see this..here Also, Ilyas has been here for..60 days, which is..waaay too early, please see the link posted. 01:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * See what I mean..
 * It's too late now. Bureaucrats can't desysop. Your comments have been taken on board, however. I'll make some rules about leaving it for a set amount of time, or something.  JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  09:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Im gonna totally disagree with you Dreadnought, he may not have the most edits but he definatly has been an active member of the community and is very trustworthy. --Whiplash 13:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I have been convinced the other way again... And we can put in a request for desysopping (We did for Shadowdancer)... And please Ilyas, don't say anything else about Shadowdancer... he is kind of my friend (Yeah I know - Kill me) 14:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Requests for desysopping are, I believe, only to be used when a sysop abuses their power. And as far as I know Shadowdancer doesn't hate me either. Then again, I can't remember. Oh, hang on, yes he does, there was that...incident. But I have a very forgiving nature and treating someone as a criminal for the rest of their time, even if they're not here, is just pointless. I'd be more than happy to be friends with him. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  15:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

There is something I want to say. Even though I've been here since June, Ilyas actually has more edits than me in a shorter amount of time, according to whatever it is above from Dreadnought. And I'm a sysop. Now, I was RFAed, but I got 2 votes (well, only Eucarya and Hyenaste, but they were pretty the only active users at the time) while he's gotten, well, I dunno, whatever. But, I guess that's life :) So, Ilyas, I'm not voting against you, this is just a comment. ДҖ-- Huanghe63 talk 15:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You know, Dreadnought is kinda right. Look here. I must, if not completely, to some degree, agree with him. Oh, someone told me that I have too many pics on my sig, I took the crown thing off, I figured it was... kinda unintentionaly bragging. * _ * 15:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Since there's essentially nothing we can do there's not much point talking about it. Unless you want to abuse your powers, just to get yourself desysopped. :p JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  15:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * WEll, I don't see point in doing that! So, I don't want this to be too long because there is no point in it but Dread, some people don't edit every day. I only go on the computer on 3 days of the week. So not everybody has lots and lots of edits!16:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * De-sysops should only happen in extreme circumstances. This is not one of them.  --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 18:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, whatever. I think we can all live like this, and please stop putting pressure on me. I'm sure that I'm not going to kill everyone here or something so what is the big deal? It seems that Dreadnought doesn't like me anymore and nor do some of you. I can live with that.18:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well then I guess I don't like anyone. 18:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't saying that. What have I done?! Well, I apologize to everyone for causing all of this, if it was me. I'm sure I've angered Dreadnought and I really apologize for that.18:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has gone far too far. Nobody dislikes you, Ilyas (well, except possibly Dreadnought, but I can't really tell). And no-ones putting any pressure on you. There's nothing anyone can do about this now, so there's nothing to pressure you about. You're an admin - live with it :p By the way, I added the time of your sysopping to my "Ilyas is sysopped" comment. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  18:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Your right, lets end this discussion. I am an admin now and I'll do what I have to, regardless of what anyone thinks. I'll help the wiki and use the powers.18:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Chrislee33
I'm nominating User:Chrislee33 for adminship, if they're willing to have it and other people agree. Some truly excellent content creation such as the Balloon Transport System, Gnome Restaurant and a lot of the trivia stuff for quests like Cold War is really great. Chrislee33 has also been around for a significant amount of time. -- Eucarya Talk 08:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Total support - Your right he's also been alot of help with wikifying things :p. --Whiplash 11:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Certainly been around for quite some time, I've yet to see anything to complain about... :D JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  16:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Been here for a while, longer than I have! He also makes good contribs and is active. He has a whole load of pages he created or helped with on his user page. I think he is well suited for the job.22:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Support! She's been doing a great job, and been around for quite a while. I was gonna request admin for Chris, but I forgot about it :) GL! 20:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Really, Dreadnought, is "it"/he/she a he or a she?20:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Can we admin him now? Or do we have to wait 2 weeks, I read that above. We seem to all agree, he deserves it. But do we need more votes? Are admins only allowed to vote? Or can anyone?20:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Anyone can vote, only allowing admins to vote would be kinda silly - on most wikis there aren't enough admins. And yes, we have to wait two weeks. Gotta give everyone chance to dissent if necessary. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  20:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, it wouldn't be fair if only admins could vote. But when I voted Support for Whiplash at the last moment, like the last day, it was deleted or something. It wasn't there the next day, my vote. I wasn't saying only admins can vote, but only asking. Still, he deserves it.20:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That's because you first voted your support, then for some reason undid the archiving of the old nominations. It was rolled back to before you did you vote. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  20:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, well, this isn't the place to discuss that. Sorry Chrislee for carrying this conversation in your section. Anyway, thanks for telling me, I didn't understand rollback at that time, and I never thought about it until now. But does Chrislee33 even know we have and are voting for him?20:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  20:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all the support, everyone. I shall do my best when i become an admin.  thanks again Chrislee33 21:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You deserve it. You've been here longer than me and alot of other active editors!21:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * NOTICE OF INTENT. Chrislee33 will be made an admin on friday 23rd, unless we have objections now.  Objecting after the event is not an option!! --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 16:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * NOTICE TO EUCARYA. It's the 23rd sysop him :P.--Whiplash 22:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, since he agrees, and since I've seen his edits, sure. ДҖ-- Huanghe63 talk 23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * User "chrislee33" is now a sysop --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 23:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Sacre Fi
Sacre Fi is a hard working member of the community. He has a good way of dealing with vandals, converting them, or just ignoring them and reverting or asking for the "vandal page" to be deleted. He has shown that he deserves this. He is kind to new users and shows them how to do things. He gives them tips. I have a habit of doing these things without informing the nominated person, so I wont forget. Still, he is doing great. He started in December, December 17 I believe.23:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Heheh, at least you asked this time. ^_^ Aren't there already quite a few administrators here already? I'd be more than happy to do it, but it's gettin' a bit crowded. Thanks! 23:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * And so is the wiki in general!23:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I've thought about it, and there's not much that a sysop can do that I can't beyond blocking... maybe I should withdraw from the nomination? =/ 02:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Support From Imperic.! Sacre Fi is a hard worker to the wiki. When I joined he showed me around. xD. He's really nice with new people, I support him every step of the way! Enough Said.
 * So, you decided to come? -.- 02:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There is much that a sysop can do, blocking, mediawiki, unprotect and protect, delete and restore, revert more easily. Your choice. But not many people have voted.02:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Meh, it's fine being a lowly peon, and I can always pester the sysops if I want something changed. ^_^ Although MediaWiki is tempting... I'll think about it, but I guess I'll still keep this here while thinking. Feel free to vote, I guess. =/ 03:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * We should wait a few weeks, 2 weeks at the least.03:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Support; as I've said before, I'd happily sysop everyone I trust on this wiki. Make it much easily to implement some of our policies. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 11:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I trust Sacre Fi very much both on the wiki and the game. --Whiplash 11:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support God, I thought you already were a sysop. Well, If you aren't, I think you should be.00:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, can I at least pretend to be stricken with peonage? Please? 01:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I suppose so. All admin duties are vonluntary. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  08:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, ok, I'll try then, I s'pose. :) 00:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Try what? Did I miss something?00:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I said I'll think 'bout it, and so that be me saying yes. :) 00:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. I'd like to see a couple of more people agreeing here before sysopping you, but you've been doing good stuff. --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 08:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Total Rune
I am an awesome member of the community, although I haven't been here long. I am planning to do some mass edits on various topics to help the shape of the community and I can supply many MANY images of almost every item. I would make an awesome sysop/mod/whatever and I won't bribe anyone to vote for me.....*whistles and walks away inconspicuosly* 02:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait a few months. You are relatively new. Give it some time, make more edits.02:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I swear ta god I wasn't gonna bribe Vimescarrot! 02:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Vimescarrot is only one person. He only counts as one vote. I count as one vote. Everyone counts as one vote. RuneScape:All editors are equal. Besides, Vimes doesn't get bribed. And you only got here 2 weeks ago. And anyway, what would you bribe people with?02:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Moneys.....and sexes if he wants it.....KIDDING! Just the moneys.....or maybe I can give him some womens.... - 02:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You do have a habit of using... comments like that. Well, you aren't ready, you just got here!02:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Says the man who was Sysopped after 60 days and only had 200+ edits......apologize for the comment xD 02:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 60 days and had 800+ edits!02:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 200. I read the topic. :P 03:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Total edits 700 and something. That was towards articles. And huge rewrites or things like that can come in one edit. I had a sandbox at tha time, which is not an article. You don't understand... it was over 800.03:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Read the "No" section of this, 200. =D 03:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose...Doesn't seem to have the right attitude. Deletes discussion simply because he doesn't agree with them; see here, and then doesn't dicuss why he does this; a la this. His attitude to discussion is wrong; he seems to think he owns his own talk page...Oh, and should probably read up on the rules a bit more; Jagex can do more than he seems to think. However, his attitude does seem to be changing for the good, insofar as I can tell over a couple of days editing, so perhaps sometime in the future. But not yet. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 11:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Not yet I would suggest before attempting again that you should make some more edits and wait a month or two, usually users dont become admins untill 2 or 3 months after they have joined.--Whiplash 11:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose as per Vimescarrot, you seem too immature to be given this responsibility. --[[Image:Smithingimg.PNG]] Eucarya Talk 12:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Just because you would be an "awesome" admin isn't a reason for getting sysop privileges. You don't even seem to know what it's called. :\ From what I can see, your most recent edit was merely a week ago. Some of your edits don't seem so mature, either. 15:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I can see how you feel, but give it some time. A few months. You just got here 2 weeks ago.15:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. Sorry Total, but even I've been here longer than you. You shouldn't nominate yourself after 2 weeks. Wait another month or two, then we can reopen the voting. Keep up the good edits though =)! --Gangsterls 22:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose No offense, but sometimes you act like a perverted 8-year old (above). After around a month, I'll vote yes. But not now. 23:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I'm SOR-RY for being half baked when I typed this. That's the last time I get high and create things here. God knows what'll happen next time O.o 08:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * NO. Way to early man, most people have been here over 2-3 months, or at least should be before they get admin. Oh Btw Ilyas, you had 200 edits, like 500 edits that really didn't contribute much information. (talk pages, forums, etc..) 21:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - he has not demonstrated effort that could be furthered by sysop privileges nor has he established himself as a trustworthy member of this community. 21:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Acctualy, many edits can be made to a sandbox and then transfered to an article in the case of a rewrite! And, a lot of information can be added in one edit! (Speaking of myself, what Dreadnought said).00:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I can be very trustworthy. I only have 1 flaw, I have ADHD and because of that if someone says something to me like an insult I can't really control it but I retaliate and that's how I've been banned from alot of places (only to come back under a new identity) So basically you tick me off, I'mma go crazy on you (or try to control it and not go crazy) 00:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The task of a admin type person is quite a responsible job and requires a lot of dedication. I have been corrected by the current admins on several occasions for some ofmy unavoidable mistakes. It requires a lot of tact to deal with a fairly wide range of international contributors without alieniating them. Ask yourself if you really want the responsibility. Also be honest to yourself and consider if you can deal with impulsive and badly formulated reactions to your actions in a responsible way. Adminship serves the wiki and its contributors and should not be regarded as a "reward" for an individual. At this point, there is very little evidence that you can serve the community in this manner, so i side with the oppose votes. With time, maybe you will grow into the role (when you do you'll probably no longer want it). --Miw 11:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Cashman286
I know I haven't edited much, but that's because I cant because I don't know enough since I'm a free player. I know this will get nowhere, but Total Rune tried, so I don't see why I shouldn't. I just feel like I could help more as a sysop.00:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unlike Total Rune, you realize that you have to be here longer. But if you know that, why would you nominate yourself? well... Oppose.00:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Er... Oppose, sorry. It's just that you've made 52 edits, and 1 to the actual content of the Wiki... I don't know much about members' things either, but there's other websites out there and other pages on the Wiki that could help with gathering information. Maybe you could wait a little longer (2-3 months, maybe less?) and gather up some contributions. At least you attempted, though... :) 00:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * God, I feel like an idiot. :(. Anyway...I'm dropping out. Even Total Rune didn't get comments like this so quickly... 00:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, don't feel like an idiot. Be confident in yourself.01:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Chiafriend12
I've been here for 4 months, made nearly 1,000 edits, plus many people know me in this community and I know many people. I have an extensive ammount of knowledge of how to do stuff when editing to make text be bold, italicized, supifyed, subifyed, red, green , blue , etc.. I was getting pictures for the Wiki during the 2/24/07 riot in world 28, I confirmed that Black P Hats don't exist (even though the proof had to be deleted) and I have reverted some vandalisms in order to keep the Wiki tidy. So, should I be an admin, or wait longer? 05:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I like your contribions and find them informative and entertaining. As a contributor, i expect an admin to be caring to the community and help with all the subtleties of the wiki. At the same time, an admin should defend the work against abuse. This is a hard balancing act, which requires additional skills you are still developing. What i like to see most in an admin is a view where this wiki needs to go. Will the wiki flourish as a pure information database? What goals should the wiki aim for? Should it be a leading fansite or something else? Your ideas will follow from that vision and that is when contributors will request you to serve them. Until then, please continue your great work as a valued contributor. --Miw 11:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Can we put you on hold? I think many of your edits are good ones but also many of those have been to non actual articles, I think you're very trustworty and I would say support but we're going to nominate Sacre Fi so could you give us some time to get back to you? --Whiplash 12:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Disregard all that support.--Whiplash 12:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. You been here a long time and made lotsa contribz. Lol the text tricks u did aren't that hard...even I can do them. Still you probably know way more than me. Gangsterls 00:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Replying to my self....why is time doing that weird thing? I just put four tildes. ??? How do I put date in then?
 * Ooo 02:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Vimescarrot
Probally the most hard working non-bureaucrat right now. Great attitude towards the wiki. And an outstanding record. If you disagree feel free to shout me down :). --Whiplash 12:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Support! Been here a while, monitors recent changes, many helpful tips, and more! Dreadnought 16:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Support - if he's willing to take the role on. --Eucarya 09:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Support - you have my blessing. Hyenaste talk 17:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm going on a break for a while; i might be around, i might not, I don't know. It'll only be for a week or so. I'll decide when I get back... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  18:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Support Done lots of good work, deserves this. Mega lodon  99  |  Talk  12:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Support - Dedicated, active and hardworking. You've got my vote! Chaoticar 08:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Support - Def. say yes. Short cuz my keyboard is kinda busted, but yes.


 * We seem to have overwhelming support for Vimes, I think that all we need now is his agreement. --Eucarya 17:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: We have about every vote from community member's who began before October. (Excluding those who left and Couchpotato.)--◙▲╛Whiplash◙▲╛ 20:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I know, he just complained last time when I adminned him that I never actually asked him hehee.
 * I'm back, and I'm in the mood to be a crat. Hit me with it! In the face! XD JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  16:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

You heard him. Unless your death (well blind).--◙▲╛Whiplash ◙▲╛ 17:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * User "vimescarrot" is now a sysop +bureaucrat --Eucarya 19:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)