User talk:Liquidhelium/Archive 9

Re:Poke
-- 14:09, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * If they really believe a bunch of brown pixels strikes fear into peoples' hearts, that's sad. o_O -- 22:48, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Email Link on RuneScape:Administrators
Hello, I was just wondering if you would be OK with having a link to your email on RuneScape:Administrators. You don't need to provide your email address, as it will be linked to through Special:Emailuser. Please respond on my talk page. Thanks! 20:20, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re:RS:A
Hey Mr. Helm, it actually has to do with the fact that I need to use a full URL for the log actions box, and as such I need an underscore or else it doesn't work. Don't worry though, I'll be able to change that. Either I'll redo the template to include each admin's name twice; once with underscores and once not, or find out how to do it an easier way. 22:49, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I fixed it in a way easier way that ajrabbitz the floppy-eared moron suggested. And I removed all the underscores too. You can thank me any time. 23:42, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Mistakes
I corrected all of those, but I kept getting edit conflicts. I copy all my edits before saving to avoid this, so I overwrote everything by Cook then went back to figure out what all he changed, then went to add it back in. When I finished all that, you had already done it. 23:10, August 2, 2010 (UTC)

Conary1
Umm Can You please delete my account and page? I no longer wish to be on this site. Thanks. Can you also delete this message once your done? 1:57, August 3, 2010

Re:Ajrabbitz
Nou. Sir. @@@@@@ 15:04, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Last name
My last name is "van Alphen", including the "van", and it's sorted under the A. In the Netherlands "van" and "van der" are very common, that's why we sort them like that. The "van" should be capitalized however if you address someone without their first name, for example: Normally it's "Mark van Alphen", though without "Mark" it'll be "Van Alphen". 17:10, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

wat
u need to stay in the irc longer than 2 minutes seconds, u ijit. 01:43, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Cache Discussion
The reason the discussion is back is because Mod Calm said that cache finds could be discussed on the forums. This means that he was indirectly saying that viewing the cache doesn't bother jagex in any way. I believe this changes the debate completely- were you aware of Calm's statement before your post on the thread? Sorry if this seems like an attack or an attempt at persuasion. Please respond on the thread rather then my talk. Thanks. 15:12, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Archive
No, there was consensus a while back to make the change the official means of closing threads. Part of your argument was that people like Degen would not want to change their habits, though he actually supported the change. If you close a thread via the old method, I or someone will change it. 23:36, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been trying to give the job to somebody else, and I am just now finding a replacement who will switch in after this fest. Unfortunately, after the last fest, I started to enjoy running them. Ah well. I got AWB approval recently, so when I go to change all your instances of the old method, I will be doing it with maximum proficiency. 23:42, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh. I only change them if somebody bothered to edit them after the discussion was closed for cleaning purposes. As for your wikian politics thing, I am not totally sure where I stand. While I don't reject that I am politically conservative, not all political philosophies can be applied to the wiki. A constitutional republic, while effective for the administration of the country, would never be effective for the wiki. Still, I probably agree more with the conservative side. Even then, as the founding fathers intended, a balance between the two is required for the country/wiki to remain positively consistent. As can be observed with our current federal government, a shift in authority in one direction does not end well, for either side. 01:18, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

I can see you stole my Rollback Quiz. Can you please mention I wrote it on the page? 01:22, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Politics of the wiki
That was quite interesting. As I'm trying to figure out who would go where however, I'm having quite a time of it. I can see Psycho being more liberal, along with the Big Q, C Teng, Tien, and I believe myself. On the other hand, I see Degen, Andrew, and Caleb as the conservative side of things. @All talk page stalkers: I'm not trying to be offensive or anything here I can absolutely see the parallel you are drawing to IRL politics, and it's quite interesting. I think it's important to have this mix however, as some push for radical change others keep them in check. -- 01:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, "differ" may be the understatement of the week . I can see how you would place Degen as more liberal, as he does like to call for (drastic) changes at times, but on the other hand most of his changes are based on his desire to strictly maintain our adherence to our old policies. I totally agree that the Big Q does not care, but I feel that Caleb is not one who is afraid to speak his mind, or at least he used to be. As for psycho, I was a little stuck with that one too, as I see him supporting a couple of the more unpopular changes, but not fighting as much as other admins might due to his passionate following of DGAFism. -- 01:23, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * ^. In real life and on the Wiki, I am actually conservative by the way. 08:37, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, you told Aburn on his talk that I ignored your original comment on my talk. I didn't, I just wanted to make sure I had a quality response considering the depth of the comment I was responding to. You can put me down on the Conservative list if you want. 15:27, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Racist!
RAAAAAAAAAAACIIIIIIIIIST!!!

http://a.imageshack.us/img824/1375/montypythonwitch701441.jpg

01:36, August 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * RAAAAAAAAAAACIIIIIIIIIST!!!


 * http://a.imageshack.us/img824/1375/montypythonwitch701441.jpg


 * 01:39, August 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Srslytho I think your example in question 4 is a bit dodgy. I think a better way to go about demonstrating an edit that's against the style guide would be to add a comment like "I found that this item is very useful for training magic." since the use of I is a much more jarring deviation from the style guide than using the American date format. 01:56, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re:User:Liquidhelium/Sandbox
''"...Liberals are those who I see as trying to add new (and often unnecessary) content or changes...." ... Liberals #2 Degenret01''

I take extreme offense to your labeling me in such a negative way and find it to be a violation of the RS:UTP.--Degenret01 01:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

So tell me what changes I have tried to make that are so unneeded? Getting rid of the crowns that spoiled children use to show off? Here is your chance to defend your statement.--Degenret01 01:50, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * The actions of that piece of shit has resulted in the deaths of thousands of my bothers in arms, and injuries to tens of thousands more. And all for personal reasons having nothing at all to so with the security of the country. It was a total misuse and abuse of his powers. I can not see how any thinking human would NOT criticize him.--Degenret01 01:59, August 13, 2010 (UTC)