Talk:Charms

Giant Spiders drop Gold Charms SOMETIMES, it's quite rare but it does happen.

If you get a drop from something that has a zero listed go ahead and update, no one should argue about it. This stuff is still developing. I also am going to start doing values in a range instead of solid numbers, to be a little more accurate.--Degenret01 06:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, it seems as if a monster drops one charm, it drops them all (excluding the abyssal and obsidian charms). For instance, moss giants frequently drop golds and occasionally some greens. Some people assume that is all that the mossies drop, but I know for a fact they drop blue and crimson as well. Granted, blues are very rare, but they do drop. I think that Degenret has a good idea on making some sort of drop percentage rate for the charms being dropped by specific monsters, it will be much more accurate. 10:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Clv309
If you only love to delete but not be helpful or contribute, then please go away. In over 100 changes to this page your only action was to delete something without replacing it. That is not helpful.--Degenret01 08:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Abyssal n obby charms
After the second batch of critters gets released and we know what we need for them, if these charms remain secondary ingredients they should each be move to thier own pages, and not stay with the others, being of a totally different category. Anyone?--Degenret01 09:14, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, I agree. 09:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Charms should be tradable.

Help from knowledgeable person please
There was a table tat showed what monsters dropped charms at approximately what rates and Butterman wrongly deleted it. I can't get it back. Does anyone know how? It was not the current table showing what increments they drop in, but about how many charms one could get by killing 100 of each creature type. The version "23:09, 8 March 2008 71.231.230.240" is the last to have the table that many many people put countless hours into for the benefit of all.--Degenret01 08:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I had to delete it, and it was not wrong. It violated RS:SG. [[Image:Bloodbarrage.png]] Butterman62 (talk) [[Image:Icebarrage.png]] 01:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * An additional note: To be honest, I actually liked the table and I disagree with the policy. Yet, rules are rules. Maybe you should ask for it to be taken away on the yew grove. [[Image:Bloodbarrage.png]] Butterman62 (talk) [[Image:Icebarrage.png]] 01:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Need help still from someone who knows how to fix blunder of butterman.--Degenret01 01:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Degenret, it was not a blunder. Please see the note on your talk page and re-read policies. Rules are rules. [[Image:Bloodbarrage.png]] Butterman62 (talk) [[Image:Icebarrage.png]] 01:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You mean RuneScape:Style guide? Why don't they belong in articles? They're useful. 01:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * They don't belong in articles, because they're not based off of percentages or fact, they're based off of luck. And since no one has the same luck, they're not really that useful. 04:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Drop table/Input and consensus NEEDED
Because I do not want an edit war or something (or to get blocked) I say we need a discussion regarding a drop table. A drop table would have the average number of charms someone could expect to get by killing 100 of any of the listed creatures. This is not the same as a drop log because its' numbers will be based on the experiences of 2 or more people. More whenever possible. When the table was up I referred many people ingame to it and it was greatly appreciated by them. I further state that the table should stay based upon RS:IAR for any who would like to argue that it violates a rule. People, we need a consensus on whether it should happen. Please input.--Degenret01 02:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I know I am new as a registered user, but I have used this wiki for about 6 months now. So I am not a total noob. (Just a minor one). I am not sure that the table can be called a lot different than a drop log (isn't it like a SUMMARY drop log?) but the point regarding RS:IAR looks very valid. Even the statements of Butterman seem to suggest he would have not done so had he been aware of that. But shouldn't this be on Yew grove to get consensus? --Varthlokkur 03:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not really Yew Grove appropriate. It's only affecting one page, and IMHO that should stay on this talk page. However, as to the drop log point, as far as I'm concerned, it IS a drop log. As far as I'm concerned, it DOES help the article. I'd rather a list like that then a T/F thing over which monster drops charms. Although, I'd prefer more than just 2 people killing 100 monsters each. So we'll need to work on that. =P Add at least 5, and probably at least 500 monsters, averaged out to be charms per 100. 04:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)