RuneScape:User of the Month

Some users have contributed a considerable amount to the wiki, both in article content and in discussions. If you think a user deserves to be recognised, you can nominate them to be user of the month here.

Criteria
Many rules are unnecessary, as the act of being supported by other users outweighs such things as past offences and number of contributions. However, a few rules still apply:


 * You must notify the user you have nominated them as they may wish to withdraw.
 * The nominee must be a registered user and not an anonymous IP address.
 * You must not nominate anyone who has been already given the spotlight.
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

2007

 * March - Vimescarrot


 * April - Dtm142

How to nominate a user
Simply create a headline with a link to the user page of the user you are nominating and give us your reason. A user will be chosen by the beginning of the new month. Good luck!

Whiplash
A good overall user. He did most of the blocking against "You may call me V" in that huge vandal attack a couple weeks ago, and I think he should be User of the month for May. Cashman286|(Talk)|(Contribs)|(Shop)| 13:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Whiplash is da bomb yo! On a serious note he deserves it. I've only been here like 3 days and I don't really know him (or anyone else here for that matter, cept for Vimes, Sacre and Pirys) so meh, go whiplash! 13:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Whiplash deserves it. 16:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Support like a million times. Whiplash is a great user and so he deserves it. 06:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Good contributor. 06:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * SupportI SUPPORT!(shipat13 is the best)
 * S-to-the-u-to-the-p-p-o-r-t!' (Unrelated)Hmmm how can you tell you have had 500 edits? 21:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Why not? Chaoticar 03:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Great person, lot of edits, and very friendly! --Lildogg747 22:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Total Rune
I nominate myself. I should be the user of the month because I got this account from my idiot brother Nicholas after giving him a swirlie and threatening to do it again. Plus, I am very suave and handsome, and also extra manly. I love the ladies and the ladies love me ;) 13:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Sure why not? --Whiplash 13:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Lol I just noticed the rule "You cannot nominate yourself" so uh......someone nominate me. *strikes a suave pose while puffing on a corncob pipe with his left arm and flexing his right arm* 13:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Spiffy! 06:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I knew Sacre Fi had fallen for my overall handsomeness and suaveness ;D lol. 06:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Um.. doesnt the criteria section state that you are not allowed to nominate yourself? JalYt-Ket-Gambler 10  Talk 21:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Umm...doesn't the criteria state that you should shut it cuz I already admited I made a mistake. But I'm still in the running cuz someone else nominated me, but they told me via my talk page, therefore I'm still in the running. 21:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah lol I didn't notice that part. JalYt-Ket-Gambler 10  Talk 21:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. Some of your edits were made by your "idiot brother", you didn't read the criteria before acting, you showed some careless acting on my talk page, sometimes you cheat by splitting a edit into 2 to get more edits and it is not recommened to have redirected image as a signature. Well, that's my opinion. 12:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - 1. not only should you not nominate yourself, 2. I'm unhappy generally that you allowed your brother to gain access to your account - as far as I'm concerned your account is not secure, and the person typing today under your user might be someone else tomorrow, and 3. almost all of your edits seem to be in User and Forum space, and a few tiny little edits in the main wiki space. Even if you sort out problems 1 and 2, I don't think you've done enough to be considered because of the small amount of work on 3. --Eucarya Talk 13:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: I do not think that a person that blackmailed his brother by threatening to give him a swirlie if he doesn't give you the account should be the user of the month. And also not all the edits were made by you, but by your brother. Also being suave and handsome shouldn't make you the player of the month. JalYt-Ket-Gambler 10  Talk 02:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Richard
A great contributor, an admin, has much expierience with the Wiki and he came here on May 4 of '06. So, is that not enough? I say it beyond is. 23:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose No offense but (like me) he's only been active recently. Also I don't think that the joining date should really matter. Hell I joined in October 06' and nothings happened to me so far... Chaoticar 03:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - But what about before that, when he became an admin? A long time ago... We should take past and recent contribs into notice, shouldn't we? 23:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral - He took a very long break he should make some more contributions before being nominated. --Whiplash 14:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Sacre Fi
Sacre Fi has made 1,500 edits and is a member of RSW Counter Vandalism Unit. He is a great contributer, which is why I support him. JalYt-Ket-Gambler 10  Talk 02:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5|_|pp.--|- 1 5|_|pp.--|- |-||/\/\ 70. 03:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, and Chiafriend please don't speak like that. (I just can't read it.) 06:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll translare. Translation: "Support I support him too." 14:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Made many outstanding contributions including (Grrr!) Construction rooms and furniture. Chaoticar 22:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Strongly Support Aside from making many outstanding contributions, Sacre Fi was also very nice to a certain user who had just joined the wiki (me), and answered a lot of my questions. Tesfan 01:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)