User talk:Azliq7

Please leave a message by clicking here.

Please leave anything yummy here.

Every single "date" page?
Are you editing every single date page??? Because it looks like it 10:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Per the above message, you're a machine. Or a bot. Or both.  Thanks for styling all those Oct-Dec dates, I wasn't aware of the antique updates, categorizing etc.

18:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Wiki Market
We've had a Market forum on the old forums, So it was sometime in the first half of 2007. 14:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

HAPPY EASTER FROM YOUDEAD00
Youdead00 will now give you a free easter present!!!!AND,you get to choose!! Which one??



The Evil chicken? OR a normal chicken?

Vote about this in my poll!

HAPPY EASTER!!!

Userpages
Two users created their userpages in the wrong places. Maltesedog is a player article, and some other guy made his userpage in Category:Pkers4life. Just to let you know. :)  16:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sure. 16:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I can't find the guy who created Maltesedog. It says that User:Maltesedog hasn't been registered, so it must have been an IP or something. Oh well. 17:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Featured Image Concern
Just a quick thought I had. Not sure if it has already been discussed, however, as the featured images are randomly distributed about and the wiki is well monitored for vandals we shouldn't need to worry to much but in the event a featured image is re-uploaded with a vandal graphic there is still the slight chance for a bit of time it could broadcast across the main page. Might we consider protecting the images in the featured article category and unprotect them in the event a newer versions comes available. I know this issue hasn't happened yet, but hypothetically speaking, it could. 14:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think just a semi is fine. That way it's odd of being a random vandal are slim and most users would be able to update the version if needed. 15:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

second FIMG image
Hey Az, I think I understand what you are trying to do by taking out that second image I put in the FIMG nomination. The reason I used a seperate image instead of just updating the image that was nominated was to avoid a possible edit/revert war. You suggested that I go and update the nominated image, and I went and did that for both the trollweis image and the ancient cavern image. I am concerned that this is going to spark some tension. I would rather be able to put a second similar option in the nomination and let people decide for themselves. What are your thoughts on this? Thanks, 21:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC) PS - Plus there is a delay between when you upload the updated image and when the wiki actually shows the change on the page. That would mean that people might see the older version of the image instead of the newer, an issue with time sensitive material such as this.
 * This is what I was trying to avoid User_talk:Tollerach, I think adding a second picuture is not going to be seen as stepping on people's toes. 22:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Brassica Prime
Ummm, didn't Brassica Prime actually pass. My count is 5 supporters with 1 comment that could easily be consider opposition. Still 5 to 1 sounds like a consensus in favor. Could you let me know. 23:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

PS - Sorry if I'm pestering you to much, I just want FIMG to go well.

question?
Can you help me with editing I am so confused?