User talk:Coolnesse

My Archive

Graphical Improvements - WTF?
Hey, Coolnesse, quick question. Why did you remove the Goblin mail at the "Inventory" section? It was a graphical improvement and you had no reason. I also deleted the Stranger, as that was an SD-HD comparison. 14:17, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, please see my talk page.  15:30, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Images
Done, 17:52, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Congratz
Thanks...I guess. 22:36, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Help!
...Why? *becomes paranoid* 11:33, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I'd rather not, I'm not good with words. 11:49, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Duplicate images
I saw you mark up a series of images, like File:Guthix chick.gif and File:Zamorak chick.gif as being duplicates, however a recent consensus on the forums decided that different items should have different images even if they currently look the same. So yea. There's that. 18:42, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Hey, cool off on the speedy deletion stuff. I went to Category:Speedy deletion candidates, and sure enough, 99% of them were there because of you. Just because an image is unused does not mean that it needs to be deleted. Many editors look for pictures for the articles that they're making. "Unnecessary" is not the same as "unneeded". Some pictures are, yes, unnecessary. But you are nominating possibly useful pictures to be deleted just because they are unneeded/unsed currently. -- 13:37, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Unused files
Hmmm good question. I don't think they're necessary at all actually. We already ahve a picture of the entire forums, including the icons there, so its not like we can just stick them into the forum article. So yea I'll delete them as soon as I'm done fixing up the raven article. 00:25, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Necklace images
I thought more detailed, without unnecessary armour was all that counts. Looks like the wiki has made up yet another rule. >_> Anywho, revert them if you have a problem with the images, I just thought I was helping. 20:50, July 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've had a read through the Images and media policy and there is absolutely no limits on users and their methods regarding images, including using the Orb of Occulus to get more detail on necklaces. It seems to be a rule that you just made up, which is evidenced by the fact that the Cleanup tag you put onto the Boater image (which you linked me to on my page) was done by you. Now, just because you disagree with the methods of other users doesn't mean you have to try to rule the wiki with an iron fist, you make enemies that way.  23:42, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Instead of posting more images which need re-doing, redo them instead of complaining? 23:55, July 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * And you've proven your point. I read that very same rule and that lead me to understand (in my necklace images) that I should ONLY take the subject area, which is around the chest and head, hence why I took those images like that. It seemed a little silly at the time to have an image further away in the Equipment setup screen and have the legs and hands included, wouldn't you say? Especially now we have the resources (the OoO) to get images closer than ever before. Those images you just posted do need replacing, yes, but that doesn't mean you can't help yourself. I mean, it saves effort for you to change the images yourself when you notice they need replacing, rather than tell someone else about them and hope that they bother with the small change. I understand where you're coming from though. 00:08, July 20, 2010 (UTC)