User talk:Clv309

meany
you are soooooooo mean saying "urge you (ha, I'll probably get in lots of trouble for this) to completely ignore Cruser-what's-his-face and get rid of the template" wtf.i was about to get my ass out of it :O 19:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep, so mean for being too lazy to look up your username in the middle of what I was writing. K. Christine 17:49, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Um okay I will delete the template then. Scissors x 08:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi friend. 08:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi friend. That...Was a weird wedding. =P 09:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Your Wedding
I am honored to have performed your wedding. Although I am sorry about the sandwich lady. I had called to order a pie a few hours earlier and she must have got lost and showed up late. I hope I can attend your larger public wedding.

- Your Priest

Your child's blog
I left a note for Bonzi about your child's blog, and thought that you have equal interest in it too. ;-)  18:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

A Wedding Present
I've made a video of your wedding and uploaded it to youtube here

Hope you enjoy it. -- 17:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on your wedding! I hope it all goes well with you and Bonzi. :] 06:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

PS: On your userpage it says you seem bitchy. Don't worry, in my time across a bunch of different wikis, I've seen some much worse people.


 * Telos has a point. You're not bitchy. And I'm sorry I could not see the wedding. Or provided Chicken control! ^_^ 16:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note that he didn't say I wasn't bitchy, just that he's seen people who were worse. =P Christine 17:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The cruser page
Wow, when you have everything laid out like that all in one spot its so obvious he was trying to inflate his count just for his RFA. In all your time here have you ever seen anything like this before? I am finding myself rather disgusted. Do we have some coummunity process to review his actions? --Degenret01 01:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Whoa Christine...you killed him. :D  01:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi friend(I like to say this.=P ), Good job on taking him down! I have been noticing this and Black Knight(you should take a look, its not as much, maybe 6 edits.) Thank god an admin finally took this into consideration. I felt bad that people, not just cruser, get edits by doing minor edits and at multiple intervals to the same article. 02:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:AWB
I'm sorry, I didn't think AWB counted as a bot because it requires user input to make any changes. I was just using it to fix typos. Thank you for alerting me of this.-- 18:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

70 Characters
Lol, just minor edits. I'm trying to do a basic HTML tidy on some articles, such as aligning the "=" sign in infoboxes. It's not a big edit, just trying to make some consistency with other articles and to clean it up a little, organize it some. 07:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I've actually talked to you before. My old account is on your first talk page. :) --Hi Im Linus 21:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Legaking
Seeing the transcript, it's quite obvious you made the right call, in all honesty, if I were in your place, he wouldn't have made it half way through that conversation (yes I know, I'm the strict 'crat...). As for Cruser, his block has been extended to a month, his rollback rights removed, and should he try to evade his ban again, his block becomes permanent.-- 23:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

hiya
fizz is not my accont i i did try three time's though and that was fizz's judgement to enter not mine he made that threat not me... man i was acting like a total a** that night i gotta stop taking my anger out on other people totaly 100% my fault no hard feeling for you kicking me but your prob gunna not like me(i dont blame you) well what ever i could really careless i kinda was in a bad mood but that still doesnt justifey what i did not at all http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/5042/earthtailsmanstaff2.pngLegaking Talk |undefined 20:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

In response...

 * And I don't know who you think you are, but that's beside the point. If you're not an idiot, you have already read what I've told you that I've done to recify my actions (proof is readily available if it is needed.) That alone is a LOT more than one could say about Stinkowing. and THAT is why the entire discussion is taking place. I hold grudges against people for what they have done in the past but, in the end, those grudges fade and all that matters is what is happening now and learning from mistakes. This behavior has been shown from Stinkowing twice before this debate: do you really think the Wiki is learning from its mistakes the way I have?


 * P.S. You said something about cockiness? You may or may not know how hypocritic it is to call one a narcissist while the accuser bases such assumptions on opinion. Hell, you're trying to portray the image of a Daniel in this entire debate when you had nothing to do with it until only minutes ago! You're entitled to your opinion, but opinion is different from fact. You speak to me as if your opinion is fact, so please learn how to seperate fact from opinion accordingly.


 * If you have nothing to say about the situation, then why are you posting on it? I NEVER thought I'd see the day that an admin would break a rule after swearing by oath not to!
 * There is rebutting evidence scattered throughout both debates over this topic! It's practically endless, and the evidence shown by myself alone should have been enough. With the failed efforts of four other users, though, the site continues to be run as a tyrannical oligarchy, and neither I nor anyone else without power can do anything about it. You a******* have taught me a very valuable lesson, though, so it's not all bad.
 * Okay, I need to leave for today; have a good time helping the oligarchy lead the site through yet another day of tyranny.


 * "I'm very good at [arguing].""
 * That's a load of bull because none of your points made sense; it doesnt MATTER that everyone has the right to speak because according to the Wikian rules, off-topic posts are SPAM. That fact alone nullifies three of your points; you not caring about the situation proves that you posting irrelevant comments on the Yew Grove has no purpose yet, AS USUAL, is allowed just because you're an admin;only two of Stinko's 3 bans were justifiable, but except for the first one, none of them were not arbitrary due to the extremely long amounts of time, and the IP-address ban that was COMPLETELY arbitrary since I didn't vandalize once; I've proposed change after change and countless other users have too (not just on the YW, either)...The autocratic attitudes of you and all other admins (except, maybe, Azaz and Chia) are unbelievably unfair and your minds have been clouded by some type of power hunger or other form of distortion; "assuming good faith" is trash that only I'm supposed to follow, due to the fact that nobody assumes good faith with me whenever I say I've changed. Your hypocrisy astounds me, and I'll take you seriously when it's gone and you learn to listen to your own advice.

Clarifications
Hello Christine,

I must make my point clear that I do not think you have broken any policies. My intentions for yesterday was simply to be used as a pointer, and my intentions were in good faith. I admit that I got a bit hot blooded and over-reacted, and for that I apologize. My hope is that we can put this incident behind us and continue contributing to this wikia, to the benefit of you, me, and the rest of the wiki community.

Yours, 20:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

RE:.
=O?? 14:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad you think so. I had to retype it three times before I decided to "Save page" =P. 14:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Stink
I'm not much good at arguing, so I'll just ask a couple questions. 1. Assuming he does come back and does reapply for adminship, do you really believe anyone will re-elect him? 2. Do you think Vhosythe will stop bitching and actually make more productive mainspace edits? Yours fictionally, Biggles. (WWTDD? 15:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC))
 * Thanks for answering mah questionz. I'd count myself among the people who'd be pissed off (in fact, I'm still rather ticked off).


 * Also, do you think 'Vho' will take back his earlier 'rebuttal' now that you're 'on his side'? WWTDD? 20:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I know you're not on his side, but he'll probably think you were.


 * Secondly, that post about Wejer's was his idea of a rebuttal. WWTDD? 22:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's on yer talkpage, about 3 posts up. ;) WWTDD? 22:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. I'll leave you to recuperate. WWTDD? 22:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Y
You'll have to be more specific. Nominate an article. Unless you want a whole archieve dedicated to errors, I recommend it be of average length. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 18:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

That code number
Has been sent to your myspace inbox.Too many spies <.<    >.>     around here for me to post it in the open, but wasn't sure if you check it without being told. And to all the talk page stalkers, NO IT IS NOT MY PHONE NUMBER. for real, sheesh. LOL. --Degenret01 13:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Check []

E H M
Don't be a nimrod---Your essay is well thought out. The referenced essay has some good points in it too. Illegitimi non carborundum. 19:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)