User talk:Joeytje50

Anyone posting "First", "second" or any other variants of "#th" will get a Lorem Ipsum on their talk. (i'm not saying how long it will be )

#th
I didn't say first or 2nd. BTW hi. 10:56, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Zwei
Guten tag, 10:59, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

 --Cakemix 11:28, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Uotm thing
were u intending anyone to read that text next to your smiley

cuz u just jelly nub

urs ponderingly

05:19, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Signature
It is screwing up. It cannot show the joke "you have new messages" anywhere other than on your user page or talk page or a subpage of yours. It cannot display on other peoples talk pages or forums.--Degenret01 12:37, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Artisans Workshop

 * The numbers are calculated, based on assumptions that may not be true. It's better to let the computer do the math. -- 20:04, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the cost of misinformation from typographical errors is higher. -- 20:12, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * In that case, how about this: I'm reworking the table. Please don't change out from under me. Okay? Also, it's expected that there will be other changes as we learn more about the workshop and how xp works. -- 20:23, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Dude, your numbers are wrong. As I explained, the article is under construction. Information is going to change. -- 20:45, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, the original numbers were mine, as well. One more time... It's under construction. Now I have better info, and I changed the numbers. It's a wiki. It's editable. -- 20:55, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * After I updated the table, they were all different. -- 21:05, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * All the break-evens, anyway. That was the point of the table in the first place. -- 21:09, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * One more time, again. The break-even numbers were updated based on new info. The old info was wrong. -- 21:40, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * But you put the old numbers in, the ones that don't take the 20% bonus into account. So I put the new numbers back in. -- 21:43, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * In excruciating detail (kind of why the exprs are better, imo):
 * Iron sword as stated by Jagex: 3242 xp (includes 20% bonus)
 * Iron sword without 20% bonus: 3242/1.2 = 2701 (about)
 * Iron smithing outside: 2812.5
 * Break-even: 2812.5/2701 = 104% (not realistic, so the bonus is necessary) -> 100%
 * Or
 * Steel sword as stated by Jagex: 4538 xp (includes 20% bonus)
 * Steel sword without 20%: 4538/1.2 = 3781 (about)
 * Steel smithing outside: 2200
 * Break-even: 2200/3781 = 58.1 or 59%
 * HTH -- 21:52, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * The calculation for steel uses the Jagex number with the 20% removed, because the 20% would not be awarded or prorated for players who get less than 100% performance. Who says this? Players who are actually smithing. It would be great if Jagex explained in their game guide how their game works, rather than requiring players to reverse-engineer the game, but there it is. I don't really know how to explain the math to you more simply. -- 22:01, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Despite what I just said, let me try one more thing to help explain. Say a player is smithing iron swords. For 100% performance, they get 3242 xp. For 99% performance, they get 2674 xp. For 98% performance, they get 2647 xp. Suppose they're doing steel. At 100% performance, they get 4538 xp. At 99% performance, they get 3743 xp. At 98%, they get 3705 xp. HTH -- 22:12, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

The number that comes after five! I forgot! :D
- Freeze967 And whatever date it is, yay me.

Hai
Should we make pages for each type of burial armour? 20:56, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh good, they've already been made.  21:00, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

stop changing rune ceremonial swords to members only, they are not.

RE: Quick Preview bug
Thanks for letting me know, it should be [ fixed] now! -- 04:38, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Ceremonial Swords
maybe you're reading the guide wrong, it requires P2P to MAKE the sword, but they are able to be used in F2P.

This is no different than lvl 3 clue scroll armor. Evets 08:17, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

File:Nonmem.png|thumb

File:Ceremonialf2p.png|thumb

Re:Picture you can't see
Can you see this? 11:13, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * From what I can see he is saying that he is f2p, with the boots of lightness, but he can still use the ceremonial sword. I believe he is telling the truth, partly because he went to quite a bit of effort, but at the same time it could still be a members item. I'm inclined to guess it's f2p from the picture, but I have no idea if it is or isn't from the picture. 11:59, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

ceremonial sword
even if it were a bug, isn't the point of this wiki to be up to date and accurate with the information?

if it is changed a week later, then you change the information.

Miner ancestor
Coupe you please trans the image? Thanks! 19:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Message you left on Zamorak Wiki
I know you can see my rl name, but it's just my first name, and it's fairly common at that, so I don't see why it couldn't be shared. I don't share my rsaccount name because I don't like the name of it, and I tell you every other name I've ever had on it, isn't that good enough? :P 03:14, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

4m
Aww... I wish it wasn't a userpage edit :( 20:08, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Strange old man
I think... If the SOM is Sliske, then Sliske is most likely a follower of Zaros... Because he refers to Azzanadra in a way that would mean he knows about your plan and he's delighted...

76.14.69.111 05:34, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Images
Unfortunately I lack a program decent enough to add trans well or the patience to go through and try and white out everything in the background as I've tried doing that a number of times and gotten sick of having to trace around the image than go through and finish the rest  22:16, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Lyrics
Damn. =P Kun je die van TGBR en Rocking Out op mijn talk zetten? Die heb ik nl. niet. =P 18:08, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE:
Thanks, Joey! And I'm waiting for the page to reach 100 sections before I archive it >.> 03:13, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, so I had an idea. What if at the top, above the RC and EW, it showed the latest log entry? Any ideas on how to do this? 07:37, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. But I'd have to get rid of the code I added to my .css, right? 07:56, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * K. So, I managed to grab the latest log entry |timestamp|title|ids|sizes|parsedcomment&rcshow=!bot&rctype=log&rclimit=1 here. Just need to figure how to work with it now >.> 08:03, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I made it so that the RC Watch doesn't get any log actions without requiring any extra css. I got the log watch thingy to work, but it's having the problem where it doesn't remove the last row. I'll see if I can get that to work tomorrow. 08:26, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yay, I got it to work! And I changed it so you only need to import 'User:Supppa_chuppa/hybrid.js' now to make the page work. 08:36, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Picture taking guide
You know your picture taking guide is great, but you forgot to cover one thing: "NPC's that never respawn unless you leave the area and no safespots are available" (very very long). One example is that of the Big snake, although I cannot think of another npc that does that. You could add it if you could find another monster that does that :P 21:34, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

It's actually possible when you bind it but you gotta be fast :o 21:48, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Back then
LOL. So much vandalism, I can hardly believe it. 00:51, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, especially since we have like 100 people constantly watching the RC and whatnot. 00:54, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Revert vs Undo
True, most of the rollbacks are used on unregistered users. I want to keep the wiki nice and clean. As i may say, any bullshit will be rollbacked XD. Sorry for language. But i will "undo" for "not related information". I agree with you. But still, "not related information" from unregistered users will be rollbacked. Anyway, thanks for the message :) 13:33, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Title, my bad lol
heya, trying to revamp the RoW thing, could use some help :P gotta change the drop tables people did and everything to link to rare drop tables so they can see RoW specific item drops, since it's quite obvious the row has its own table now that is linked on most, if not all, monsters. (not doing all monsters ofc, just the ones that are most popular and have been edited with RoW drops). If its alright, ofc ;) i've already revamped the rare drop tables page.

edit: also, reason i put this on ur talk is because i noticed you were trying to do this earlier, but, i accidentally undid one of them not seeing what u were trying to do :p i get it now and im doing that + more ;D

just trying to help out :P

16:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, ok :3 as you've noticed, i've formatted the RoW drops into a drop table, i'll continue to modify the monsters i find with RoW drops to the page as well.

Oh, ok, i'll change them to rare then. I was putting Ring of Wealth as the rarity on there just so that it would be differentiated from the other drops so some "people" dont think its an item itself and not a link to other drop tables :P

Ring of Wealth Complete :D
The subject says it all ;) we're done with the monsters for now :P

16:55, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Blanking your talk page
Oh, okay, will do :3

19:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Particle transparency
Parsonsda has a really good method of doing this. I'm sure that he'll be more than willing to inform you guys. Tell him he is free to edit the guide if he wants to. Personally, I use the smudge tool. 16:50, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Just my 2-cents on rendering images ;P
If your wondering how people are making the images "transparent" quite well, there's tons of guides out there. Generally, the best way to render an image (ie make it 'cut-out' or transparent) is to use photoshop & the pentool.

17:08, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

You mean similar to his guide here? http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/User:Parsonsda/Project_Myface/Particles

taking the particles and making them have a slight transparency to them, just like in-game instead of having a background behind it, no?

Just checking to see whether I got your intentions right or not :3

Edit: I would make a vid for ya, but, i had recently reinstalled my OS, I don't have photoshop atm =\

17:29, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, i know GIMP, and its true it is very good :p but Im still dedicated to photoshop hehe, I have the CD for CS5 somewhere, i just haven't gotten around to reinstalling it.

17:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Sig
I don't see it messed up, the file is File:Honour.PNG. Maybe it's just messing up on you? Stuff like that does it to me too. 18:15, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Bot
Yeah, I apologize, I became really busy the past several days and was unable to work on anything wiki-related, I should have much more time to do it the upcoming week. If you already have someone else who is able to run the bot, that's great, otherwise I can work on it. -- 19:34, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually I have a question, since I've begun to work on how this will be implemented in the bot. Was there ever a decision for what sub-sections will be used to split up the drop tables?  Maybe Lv. 1-25, Lv. 25-50, Lv. 50-75,  Lv. 75-100,  Lv. 100+, and bosses?  Another issue that might come up if it's done this way is that monsters with multiple levels could fall under more than one category.  -- 03:23, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

The data for the drop tables has now been collected and aggregated by item. It's available here. All that's left to do is to fix a couple of quirks in the data, figure out the best way to group the tables (if any), and then post the tables to the item articles! -- 15:42, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re: JavaScript/Flash
I started to read, then decided that I didn't care and wouldn't understand it if I did care, so I stopped after the first sentence. 02:34, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Email
Well, why is it buggy? Does the header include deleted contributions, too? (Also, I doub't I'll do anything spectacular. I didn't do anything for 9K edits, I don't think I did anything for 8K, and that little message "Oh I see I got 10K edits" was about my best plan for my 10K'th edit). Blah See you, 02:38, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh? That's what I'm doing. Or are you referring to the IP edit for uncut Dstone to green dragon page? 15:20, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what the IP did. I saw no reason to undo it or revert, so I put it into a template. Go tell him we don't need it. 15:28, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE:pwnt ur pwnt msg
Don't you have something better to do than find an obscure talk post and use the lame rs wiki redirect? 06:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE:I saw u has helm
It is my real head  08:24, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Abusive Edits
Mind not editing pages if you don't have anything worth contributing? Instead of removing edits people make that are genuinely helpful, maybe instead you can improve them or wordsmith thing to make more sense? Give that thought. Thanks.