User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five (5 and 6 cross some)
 * Six
 * Known I.P.s I have had. Special:Contributions/216.136.67.224

Look, I have already been spammed. SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM

Re:Wiki search
You could do a Google search for that. 06:26, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn, I got ninja'd. I was going to suggest that as well. Unfortunately you can't search by namespace. I wonder if we could get Lucene Search enabled here. 06:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lucien is real? He does searches? I thought he was a bad person.--Degenret01 06:40, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats on your 3rd year on the Wiki! 07:10, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

I was just wondering...
do you know anything about photoshop? I've been trying to get images(e.g. and inventory image of a shark) by themselves with no background. I've been using the magic wand which outlines all the items in the screenshots inventory, but when I paste that somewhere, it pastes the inventory background with cut-outs of where the items where as opposed to the item images with no background. Any help is appreciated, 03:31, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Try paint.net if your using Windows. Works wonders ;) 13:47, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

Hello Sarg!
Hey Murphy!

Just wondering what your up to these days. Hit me back =) 13:47, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

RE:admin tools
If I have any questions, I won't hesitate to ask someone :3. 05:45, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

RE:DEU
It appears that section of the policy was added (relatively) recently in September, and I was never informed of the change, nor do I have any memory of a proposal to amend it. This reminds me of the time I was reading a book in English class, and after I looked up and then down again, the same page said something different. 19:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm a bit confused by the message you left me. "As an admin you are supposed to know our policies better." This sentence implies that I've neglected to read DEU, which is somewhat true, as I last read it before the furtive amendment in September. "RS:DEU. This applies to you also. Undoing an ip edit violates this policy." Unlike the last sentence, this one implies that I have read DEU, and then intentionally ignored it. It's sort of a paradox, don't you think? 20:01, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

It didn't bar IPs from editing other people's userpages, it barred everyone from editing other people's userpages (with exceptions, of course). I'm basing this on the following sentence. " [Please don't] Add or remove things from the user page if you think it would make the page look better, as the user may not want it to be so." I also noticed that you were the one who added the IP section only 14 days ago (as opposed to September, which was the incorrect time I mentioned above). I'm not at all questioning whether or not it was a good addition, but if you're going to amend a policy without telling anyone, you can't expect them to know that you did. Thus, if you make a change to a policy without telling anyone, you can't accuse me of failing to do my job as an administrator by enforcing what I understood to be the policy. 00:15, January 22, 2011 (UTC)