User talk:Maceypants/Archive 1

Visual Mode
This is what appears if you use visual mode >:D. 21:58, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_bow?curid=28222&diff=6839697&oldid=6839677
You can't expect them to go to the history of the page they reverted and then see your warning... When you revert a vandal, you have to go to their talk page and scold them there with something like Warn2 or Warn3 depending on the severity. Alot to understand but you'll get the hang of it. 02:06, December 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * You should also disable visual editor (as noted above) because VE is the biggest piece of shit to come to wikia since I started editing. 02:12, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism undo
That edit was not vandalism. Book links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book. Be more careful with your undos. -- 22:00, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Armour/Ranged_armour?diff=next&oldid=6863320
This was perfectly fine. You did not have to undo the edit. 03:22, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

Your undos
Please l2 talk to the IP's talk page when you undo stuff! Most of them are not in Recent changes looking at the edits. Thx, 02:13, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

What he said. Saying "don't vandalize" on the edit summary does nothing. 23:09, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Your Undos:Reply
Could you give me the link please? 23:15, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

Warn 1 is saying to use the sandbox to practice editing, 2 says to not vandalize, 3 is the final warning. Charm log 1 says to edit logs properly, log 2 says to not vandalize the charm log. 23:21, December 24, 2012 (UTC)

I know you're getting tired of this but....
In regards to this edit, mate you gotta assume good faith. Someone who is mistaken is not vandalizing. Now, I don't know anything about player owned ports, but from what I saw, that could easily be someone who's mistaken about the mechanics or who disagrees with a rather opinionated assessment of re-rolling, whatever that is. Assuming good faith is one of the most important rules we have for whatever reason. I think its because at heart we all want to vandalize but not be scolded for it. Love, 08:21, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, I noticed that you seem to be struggling with how to format your page, in terms of the table of contents and all that. I think I've done what you wanted on my sandbox, and if you like it you can copypasta the code from there. 23:14, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * The edit I'm referring to is here http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Player-owned_port?curid=320776&diff=6978143&oldid=6978104 Though I admit that I could be mistaken. Like I said I don't know much about ports. 23:30, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * No my friend, that is not vandalism. That is bad prose or copy editing. Vandalism is only vandalism when the intent is malicious. This person, despite their less than experienced use of the English langauge, demonstrates no intent to put in misinformation, vulgar language, or other vandal type things. 23:59, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * He did add information, though. The sentence before he edited said that it was never a good idea to re-roll. His edited version added information concerning circumstances where it might be a good idea to re-roll. Again, that information might be completely false, I don't know, but the point is, information was added, information which seems to have been added in good faith. When trying to determine if something is vandalism or not, you have to ask yourself... did this person clearly and undeniably want to make the wiki a worse place? In this case the answer is no, and in the principle of Assume Good Faith, you should answer "no" wherever it is at all possible. 02:54, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Be more careful
00:06, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Re:weaknesses
B-but fire spells have long been my weakness!

Frozen Jese (talk ) 20:21, December 30, 2012 (UTC)