User talk:3rd age farcaster

{|align="center" style="border:4px solid black; -moz-border-radius:2em; background:Gray; padding:10px; width: 100%;color: black;"

Re:ancient statuette
All of the other gods have a statuette. Also, it does matter to us if an item name was changed. It does not mean jagex retracted it, there is most likely a simpler reason as said on the Ancient statuette's page. 21:27, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * If jagex did something like that, it would be demanded by players to change it back. If you can find concrete evidence that jagex's renaming was a retraction, then I will remove it. 'Concrete' in this case means something said on the rs website, not something you find on another site. 21:36, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * The wiki does not look at things that way. If jagex changes a name, that does not mean to us that the previous name is invalid or retracted. First of all, I cannot think of any instance where jagex changed a name to retract the previous name. Also, as for things that should be in there but aren't, put them there yourself. But do not remove the statuette without proof, as it will keep being reverted. 21:51, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't agree with that, because it would be moved to a less-viewed place on the page. Trivia is generally ignored by everyone but unregisted users that add some random resemblance to it, which it then quickly removed. 22:06, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

I have asked a neutral editor to give their opinion on this. 22:18, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hey. I kinda agree with both sides here - the isn't any official confirmation of this item being Zarosian, however neither is there any confirmation of it not being Zarosian. So, i added a note to Zaros explaining such; I hope this appeases both sides. Thanks, 22:54, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Iban and Oracle
Read the new postbag from the hedge please. http://www.runescape.com/kbase/guid/postbag_43 -- 16:26, January 13, 2010 (UTC) I assume I have your permission to undo your undos? -- 16:27, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Postbag
You have my sincerest of apologies. I read Enakhra as Oracle. :( (sign comments please). Cheers for the head up -- 16:30, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Postbag
Here's some translated pieces. Dear Elemnetal,

I have wondered, it is implied that for everything, there is an opposite, so what is rour opposite, the peace elemental, perfhaps? Also, do you ever leave the wilderness, or perhaps have a sort of "Shadow realm" of your own? What about your noeligion Zamorak, Guhtix, Bandos. or perhaps another different being never haerd of in human culture? Feelf ree to add any other details that will help me learn about yuor kind.

Sincerely, Catdude61,

The answer Wasssup! Bonjour! Jambo! From beneath you, it devours jungle, desert, ice. Defeating it shall reward many kinds of adventurers. A Canal: The pieces are black and white; like good mysteries they come in fours. But the game is void; there are no Grandmaster here. A temple may sit between the pieces.

Not sure about the rest. -- 16:44, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hi
Nope, anyone is allowed to do it. All you need to do is copy the respective template (the thing in the 🇦🇩 to the left of the message) on the person's talk page. 03:49, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol realised i forgot to give you the link >.< here 04:19, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Reply
I don't have one, but I could find one, I think abusing the Pvp worlds comes under item scamming. 23:27, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say 76king is against the rules, it says abusing PvP is against the rules, then a listed the ways 76king could be used to scam people. 23:37, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

76king isn't against the rules, especially since the recent updates, the page does not require a clean up. 23:41, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

I don't really think we should change it, the article is alright, we don't need to make such a big thing out of it. Thanks for showing some interest thought  23:47, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Heh, move it if you feel necessary 23:50, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Revert
Hi there. in regard to your recent revert to Leather boots, remember to always assume good faith. Edits that are not blatant vandalism always deserve an edit summary explaining why the edit is being undone. For more info, see RS:AGF. Thanks- 19:58, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Although most other editors would know why it was removed, the user who added it clearly wouldn't; by adding it they have demonstrated that they believe it belongs there. The edit summary is really just to explain to the contributor why his/her edit was removed, so they understand the reasoning behind the revert and don't make that mistake again. As RS:AGF says: "Be patient with newcomers. They may not know how to edit a wiki or what's supposed to be added as content. ". -- 20:08, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re:when u have a moment.....
I'm ready now, what do you need? 00:32, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not the smartest person in this field but you can go here or here. 00:49, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice sig :) 01:47, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Okay so what do you need help with the userboxes? The code for the smiley is. Just post that anywhere on the page you want it on. 02:01, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * When you find a a userbox that you like, there should be a code right next to it. It would probably look somewhat like this: . Copy and paste that to your user page. If you still don't get it you can tell me which you want and I can do it for you. Also, how are you signing your signature, with ~ ?  02:17, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah you should just do ~ it adds the time too. 02:23, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay just let me know if you need me. 02:26, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:userpage
-- 01:10, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * this might help :) 01:29, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No idea :O but I'm sure there's a way. Also, I noticed that a lot of your questions can be answered by the links in your welcome message just to let you know :) 01:47, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course lol. The rule is only there so that people just don't go editing other's userpages without permission and changing stuff. 03:56, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a quote from the rule "You may edit another user's userpage: ... if editors are given permission by the author to edit the page. This includes guestbooks and some sandboxes." 04:00, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * How can I help you? :) 22:28, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I did make my template with my header and background with a tad bit of help from Manyman. 01:19, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, do you want the code for a background and I can tell you how to customize it? 01:34, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * By customize i mean change the color really :P I'll get the code for you give me a minute. 01:41, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

{|align="center" style="border:4px solid black; -moz-border-radius:2em; background:forestgreen; padding:10px; width: 100%;color: black;"

Okay so, The color Black after the word solid, you can change to change the border color. The forestgreen after Background you can change for the main background color. Change the last Black to change the text color in the background. 01:51, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you need anything else let me know. 02:24, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha no I'm not :P Swiz, Ruud, and Brux all have them, as do a lot of others. Just not everyone has them. 02:34, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, first when you are making your subpages, your making them in the pge "3rd age farcaster/..." it should be in "User:3rd age farcaster/...". And for the header go here and just read the page for instructions. 19:34, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Userspace
Hello, Farcaster.

I noticed you created several pages such as User:3rd age farcaster/house and so forth. Note that these articles where created in the mainspace, but where of a personal nature. ALL personal pages MUST be created in your own userspace. This means that all pages you create must start with "User:3rd age farcaster" and then have "/(pagename)" attached to it at the end. This means that if you want to create a page such as "3rd age farcaster/page", you would have to create it like this: "User:3rd age farcaster/page". Thank you for your understanding. 19:43, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

House template
That can be found here 19:52, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay so I moved it to . Just put that at the top of each page that you want it and it will add that. I also added the background into the head so you when you add the header the background will be there too. I also capitalized and centerd some stuff, if you don't like it tell me and I'll remove it. Also with your userpage if you don't like what I did just let me know :).  20:13, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just added an e in the bottom left side so you can easily edit it now. 20:17, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your welcome! Always glad to help! 23:47, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: just wondering about glitches
It is possible, though it isn't very practical. I can't think of a single ban-worthy glitch that wasn't fixed by Jagex within half of a day of it becoming known to the public, so they would have to be very quick to look for it. Often big glitches are not added until after Jagex fixes them for some reason. (like this) 04:55, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Userpage
I don't know how sorry :[. You can ask Rwojy. 20:44, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

I got your userpage to work, but the userboxes page doesn't work correctly if the npc infobox is left aligned. 21:22, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh I could have done that :P just forgot the code 21:25, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

I left aligned the NPC box and right aligned the userboxes on your userboxes page, as I believe you wanted? 14:24, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Anytime  21:23, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Specualtion
An area existing is not a reason to create an article about a location. Until such time that jagex says something, an article cannot be created, because it would contain nothing but a description of the area, which falls under non-interactive scenery. See RS:G. A scenery description of a place that currently has no purpose does not deserve an article. 01:44, February 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * The example was on the world map, and it doesn't have an article, it has a small section on one page. Also, an article consisting entirely of a decription of scenery is not appropriate content. I am done arguing, if you wish to add it, then make a thread on the Yew Grove, and let the community decide. 01:54, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Apologize
3rd Age Farcaster, I would like to apologize with you, I dint treat you with respect, I lost my temper with you and, I treated you in a way I regret of, and because of that I would like to apologize with you. I am deeply sorry for this and lets have a mature discussion about this. ScionCrush 02:07, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for accepting my apologies, I advice you into adding pinctures to the thread.ScionCrush 02:15, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Images
There is a little button that says "Image" besides the table one, click on it.

Warning
You are being a little harsh with the warning, specifically here. No vandal is used for blockable offences, adding noob or putting something about zezima isn't really blockable. For lesser things, you should use Template:test1, Template:test2, Template:test3, or Template:test4. 00:50, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is not the point, the point is that novandal is for severe vandalism. For smaller offenses, Template:test2 is generally used. Using novandal scares people away, and there are people that started out as vandals and have become a trusted member of the community. 00:57, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, severe vandalism. Like if someone blanks a page or part of it once, that is not serious, it could have been an accident by someone unfamiliar with wiki-editing. 01:04, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * In this case it was vandalism, but it was not severe vandalism. Template:test2 would have been appropriate instead of novandal. 01:12, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * It might get him a 3-day block, but some would just give him a template:test3 instead. 01:17, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rs Wiki
No it isn't. This is why. 03:38, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Talk page removal
Actually, yes, users and IPs are allowed to remove all content from their talk pages. Unless it is vandalism, then users should have a "right" to their own talk and user page. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 05:06, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, you are right, stuff can't be deleted, just archived. And ips are not allowed to have userpages, so they can't create archives, so all messages must remain, unless they just vandalise their own talkpage, that can be reverted. 05:15, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

orb
Lets not get into this, shall we? its already proven that it IS the same Orb, without the heads because they count as NPC's. thats why you CANT see them, and if you say "This one is round and brighter and the other one is darker and oval", it depends on every computer, graphics and bgihtness settings.

The fact that you cant see them in long distance with the orb??? Different ground level, impossible, you would be able to interact with them, we also know that JaGEx puts places likes this in the same plane but separated so that they cannot be seen, this is the case. --ScionCrush 19:25, February 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Both of you are biased, so I cannot in good faith trust what you say. I have contacted an uninvolved user to find out if it can be seen. 19:38, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * User:Gaz Lloyd, and it may be 10 or more minutes, as he is currently in a game of stealing creation. 19:43, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

I had a good look around the mithril door room, and I cannot see the stronghold of security at all. Also, the dragon heads are kinda NPCs - their names are yellow like other NPCs. Hope that helps, 21:38, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Debatable, but I would most likely believe its another of Jagex's test rooms. There's a variety of other reasons fo either side though... 17:51, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Too much like speculation either way, so I don't think so. 19:07, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ranks
This page explains it all. 02:54, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Dear God...
Do you really have to disaggree with everything that I say? Are you really this inmature? Cant you get over things? For gods sake, please, stop it.

elder demons
Because its just a visual indicator, I explained it when I edited the article, happy now? ScionCrush 15:39, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, because, how would you know its Thammaron if he was just ashes? You wouldn't know, its just to say "Hey, this was Thammaron's Realm and Throne", he wasnt killed, he died.

RE:Spinefish
Well, it was like on 10th try but I could find out how exactly rare it is, I like doing useless things :D 20:10, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I was lucky or it is because of my 99 Fishing, but the spinefish don't seem to be that rare, 6 catches out of 27 :) 20:21, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re:How do you..
Do you mean make your own totally new one? 03:51, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * All I know is you would have to make an image with a chat bubble and thats where my knowledge of it stops. There's a code to make it float, you can ask Iiii, Manyman, or Rwojy. 03:56, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ancient Statuette
Okay, you win. But Jagex obviously changed it as a cover up. Look at ancient staff, ancient curses, ancient magicks, all associated with zaros. So it clearly has something to do with zaros. Jagex has already stated zaros will be returning. I don't see why you would be denying it. -- 17:44, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

I think it's fine to be included, just like it is now, stating that it was previously called a zaros statuette, but has now changed to an ancient statuette. -- 17:51, February 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * o! My bad I didn't realize that...I'm often slaying while I post...so I mess up a bit ;) -- 17:59, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re:clippy thingy
See my new template at User:Manyman/Chat bubble. 06:50, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Locations
All of the orb locations will be on one page. The rfd is determining where it will be. Most of the locations are 'unique' but they will still go into the same page. 23:57, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Right now there is a page called Orb of oculus/Tips. The hidden locations are on it, here. The rfd is to decide whether it will stay there, or be moved to a page called Hidden locations. It isn't to delete it, the locations will still be on the wiki, this is just to decide where should be. 00:06, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * The page already exists, but it is just a section. See Orb of oculus/Tips. You can still add to it, it's just if the rfd passes, it will be moved to Hidden locations. 00:16, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Invalid Link
Hey there, I had to remove a link on this page, as it was invalid and appeared unnecessarily on the Wanted Pages. Please remember in the future to check to see if the link in valid. Thanks, 23:02, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

the article it linked to got deleted. 23:39, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Zaros
Okay, if you believe that it should be removed, go ahead and do so. I only undid the edit because it cited a cutscene in RuneScape. It's been a while since I did that quest, so I don't remember the details very much. 23:26, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:castle
You can see the Dragonkin castle with the Orb of oculus in the first room of Pyramid Plunder. After entering the first room, stand in the corner of the room and view... I think it's... Northwest? Not totally sure, but here's a very complex sophisticated diagram I drew for you in Paint. 09:42, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

zilyana
Search for it please, even though it should be worth be mentioned in the Trivia section. ScionCrush 22:17, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hmmmm, if this is the case then Jagex made HUGE typos, even with it being proved that its "accurate" history, I still think the Zilyana article is not worth mentioning, thought the AoG articles should be moved and merged into an especific article relating characters, the wars and historic facts. ScionCrush 22:18, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re:my header
Done :). The page hasn't been created yet so you'll just have to create the pages you see in your header. 21:36, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have changed your combat template to show 84. You had it say hitpoints, but it should have actually been constitution. Your header seems fine to me, no red links. 22:12, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:my header
Gaz fixed it. :O -- 21:51, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Your header
Per Iiii I I I's request, I changed your header. You may want to change the Subpages header as its kinda hard to read. Hope that helps, 21:53, March 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * This is probably what you want. 20:35, March 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * For background colour you'll need to use  or  . The names, hex and RGB codes work fine wherever you use them. (If you're wondering, to use a hex code you put # infront of it e.g. background:#CD5C5C; and for RGB use  background:rgb(205,92,92);).
 * You can slot other things into the style attribute e.g.   16:11, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE: hidden locations
Check this page. 21:22, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

RE: could you make..
How about this?

Code:

Any alterations, have a go or ask me  23:12, March 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Anytime  23:33, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Sorry
I don't blame you for anything, seeing as you were probably unaware of that RfD discussion. 03:02, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: could u please...
Like [ this]? 16:51, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Cache images
You do realise that there's thousands of images in that cache? 08:34, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe you couldn't, but there are many users here. Together we could do that. However, the cache images' quality is usually pretty bad. I would support adding images of unreleased things, under very strict guidelines, but I cannot support adding thousands of bad-quality images, especially if we already have images of their subjects. 13:32, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd rather have only the images of things that don't exist. 14:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong with a list, but it would quickly get disorganised. When there's thousands of things to list, it gets hard to make sure that everything is right (no typoes in the numbers, no items with the wrong number, etc). It wouldn't lag, but what I meant by that is that putting all images on the page would pretty much crash us all. 14:56, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I don't like the idea of a list. It gets disorganised and even sloppy very fast. 15:00, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, because we don't have lists with thousands of things on them right now. 15:23, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's a category, not a list. Categories are done automatically and pretty much cannot be disorganised. 16:31, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whatever we did with categories? Categories are automatic. That's programmed into MediaWiki. We didn't do that - Jimbo did it. 19:31, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cache
I think its an excellent argument given what we know. We know Jagex has not truly spoken on the matter and given a direct answer. They probably never will say "Do not do this because it is against the rules and we will ban you". I am convinced it is both legal, not reverse engineering and hence not against the rules. So if you can, go for it. Otherwise just try to keep pointing out that we don't actually have an answer from Jagex to people who continually rely on it being against the rules. 19:08, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Locking the thread
Seriously, it was not going anywhere, and yes, there were some personal insults being tossed around. May of the opposers were quite firm in their stand that they would not be swayed. Opening another thread without a statement from Jagex that it would be okay to have these pics will continue to result in people opposing, forever and ever and ever. Get a new answer to a properly framed question and then go ahead and reopen. But lets not waste time in circular arguments that just drain peoples emotions, it is bad for the wiki. Get more before you reopen.--Degenret01 01:08, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

re: cache
I would much prefer just to handle it over the wiki on my userpage or some other way. The in game chat interface is really..really annoying to use for conversations. 01:23, April 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think we have anything to hide, besides if we eventually want to get this proposal passed we are going to need the support of the community. Anything we say between each other wont mean much unless we are talking about rule breaking. 02:00, April 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I was thinking the same thing, just a little differently. I found Jagex business address on their corporate website and am in the process of writing a letter to them in order to get a response from someone with the authority and knowledge to answer the question properly. It will likely take several weeks to arrive and receive a response, but I am willing enough. I am hoping for the best as in the past Jagex has taken the time to respond to letters. Hopefully they will agree with us and if not, then we have our answer. 02:08, April 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * I intend on laying out everything I know about the viewer in the letter and if it reaches its intended target I doubt that they will make be silly enough to threaten banning. But if they do then I believe at that point that its a lost cause anyway and they will be knowledgeable enough to understand whats going on and if its really a breach of the rules. Sure thing, will add you to my list. 02:59, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE: a favor
Sure, let me know what you want it to do and I'll have a go at making it  12:58, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re:signature
Psycho Robot decided to change my signature to Janet Reno for April Fools', and I liked it, so I kept it. -- 19:24, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: hmm....
I'm sure that thread is dealing with cache images again. In any case we can apply RS:UCS to leak as its generally well sourced. 20:14, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

A little too far...
I don't mean to be rude or to tell you what to do, but you are starting to give people more fuel then there needs to be to oppose the model viewer. Your latest reply talking about how we should have our own rules and ignore Jagex's rules was a little too far. I agree that we should not mindlessly oblige Jagex on all matters, but people are starting to ignore the overall issue and compromise in favor of your arguments. Although I agree with you on some issues I don't want you to say something silly so I have to keep going out of the way to keep things on topic and moving along. 21:07, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cache
I've seen it, and I think it's a good article, though I suppose it could be slightly more neutral. 00:00, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Why to close
Just so you see a response to your response to my response instead of it getting lost on that page I am posting it here. You misunderstood me, I am not suggesting closing it down at this moment, but you asked "how could it be closed without consensus" and I was giving a technical answer as to the grounds under which a topic may be closed without consensus.--Degenret01 01:08, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Categories
Go to the page you want to remove from the category and edit it. At the bottom is the category panel. Each category the page belongs to is listed there. Click the X button on the left side of each button and it'll disappear. Then save it! 02:23, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah. That category was from the infobox. It was marked as a quest item in the infobox, which automatically adds it to the quest items category. I fixed it! 02:42, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats
Congratulation on creating the 14,000th article!!!!!!!!!!!!! with Fractite bar. 11:30, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

=) 07:12, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
Hmm, good question. I think I hit the rollback button because I saw that he mentioned players in his last edit, which was against policy. I didn't really pay much attention to the diff page after the rollback, so I didn't realize that I reverted a few more edits than I intended to. 20:35, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:your choice
Anyone is free to open it. I am currently thinking hard about a solution to the issue, and I hope that we'll be able to reach a compromise soon. 14:34, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ignorance
cheating(a): violating accepted standards or rules; "a dirty fighter"; "used foul means to gain power"; "a nasty unsporting serve"; "fined for unsportsmanlike behavior"

How is 76king not abusing the PvP system? Just because you like gaining an unfair advantage doesn't mean it's good.

I can't PROVE it, but I have seen you saying you 76ked on the forums. "foul means to gain power" sums up 76king. It is cheating, you get large amounts of money with no effort.

How much effort is actually needed to 76k? You stand in a spot for a while with money, then kill someone that you know won't kill you. It is a foul mean to gain power, most players are against it. Please quit your account and move to a private server where you will enjoy playing and getting coins with no effort. Thanks.

Jagex is against it, and most players are (you can't say most players are FOR it). Terrible people like you are flooding RS with cash and destroying the economy. You can not say that 76king doesn't cause inflation. Now please do what my previous comment says, and also learn what flaming is.

For one, you completely avoided the fact that Jagex and most players are against it, and second, even if it is flaming, it is true.

Jagex is against it, you can't deny that, since they ban the discussion of it and try to prevent it, and most players are against it is common sense. People who play the game as intended hate it because it devalues skilling. People who PK hate it because they try for their kills instead of freeloading and getting the same rewards. The only people who like it are the dirty cheaters themselves who try to cover up the fact that it is cheating. And what do I care about the rules for? Are you implying I can't change my IP if I get banned?

I don't care what you think, the wiki isn't anti-Jagex like you are. They own and operate the game, yet you don't care that they are against the 76k cheat? Just give up, you are just acting stupid at this point. There is no way to prove that the majority is for 76king, and if you just look around instead of acting like an idiot, you will see that not everybody likes cheating as much as you. Now please, for the sake of your already crappy reputation, just shut up.