User talk:Liquidhelium

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole.

RE: Gaz Lloyd
I would've thought it would be more logical to call a Gaz Lloyd not archiving until way over 100 sections regardless of some petition, but whatever  20:55, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lolol 20:59, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

66666666
-- 21:03, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I use the [ Forest] skin. I'm probably changing it back soon. :O -- 21:07, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * U FAIL HARD -- 21:09, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * What? -- 21:12, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup. -- 21:15, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * ... -- 21:22, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not that long compared to my other archives... -- 21:27, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Look, a distraction! -- 21:34, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Btw, Archives 9 and 10 are longer than my current one, not 6 and 8. -- 21:36, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Current one - 40kb. Archive 9 - 53kb. Archive 10 - 65 kb. -- 21:40, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wish I had one. :\ -- 21:42, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 21:45, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good idea! -- 21:48, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep. -- 22:17, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Compromise? -- 22:23, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * WAT -- 22:12, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * My toe hurts. -- 22:56, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * I BIT IT OFF I stubbed it. -- 23:27, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * -- 23:29, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Win -- 23:31, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

rolllback
Hey, sorry it took so long for me to get back to you, my fence blew down this weekend, and, well, who cares. Anywho, rollback is only used to quickly revert obvious vandalism so users who may be looking at the page don't see a page that has been trashed. We prefer using the comments for multiple reasons. The main ones are so users looking at the history can see why their edit or anyon e's edit was changed, and the reason it was changed. Sometimes people input beneficial information, but aren't aware of our style guide, or aware that they accidently erased an entire section. So it's best to explain why you moved, erased, or. Changed their edit. We have to remember that anyone can edit, and with that most people don't know our policies. If somebody is browsing the history of a page and sees some helpful information that was quickly removed with no reason, they won't know if the information was valid or not. Edit comments also help the people who incorrectly edited become better editors by telling or showing them why their edit was "wrong" or at least a better way to go about editing. We also don't want to think that people are here just to vandalise, so sometimes it's best to leave a short summary saying something like "information was removed about "x" with no reason, please explain?" To let them know they should provide reasons for removing sections. I apologize for any typos, typing on my droid keyboard. Any questions or further explaination, feel free to ask.-- 01:15, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Libertarianism/Conservatism
It took me a few times rereading your message to figure out what it was that was wrong with your thinking in terms of the libertarian position. "Libertarians, as I understand it, favor small government. Government is not the solution to the problem; government IS the problem (to quote Reagan)." Now, ignoring the hypocrisy of Reagan you seem to think government is The problem, rather than the symptom. The reason many libertarians fight for social libertarianism before absolute economic freedom is complicated, however, we'll just simplify for the sake of comprehension. "I can see where the socially liberal views on same-sex marriage abortions come in, since restricting those practices would increase the government.", What this does is increase the sheep mentality of the people, the ease of provoking a racist to fury over "that coloured becoming president", the religious dogmatic zeal of those protecting the nation against "militant atheists", or the tea partiers being whipped into a frenzy by the puppet-masters of Fox, all of this contributes to the issue. A government is simply the tool used by those in power to exert their authority, without a government they'd simply use other methods (churches, gangs, appeals to emotion, etc.) to control the complacent population. In order for a people to be ready to truly govern themselves they must have the tools to do so. Our education system is in shambles and our nation is at war with it's own citizens in the name of fighting the terrorists or worst yet, this asinine "drug war to protect the corporations children".
 * But the true issue is the mindset of the people, and herein lies the reason it is almost offensive to some libertarians to call them conservatives. The very word conservative can be broken down to its root "conserve" - it implies the person labeled is seeking to conserve/preserve something, Republican politicians (ignoring the fact they drop their "conservative" values whenever it earns them political brownie points) supposed seek to return to the golden-age of America - when men were men, women where women, and the only enemies to worry about were "those damned pinkos". Libertarians on average (outside of the party) are not patriotic, jingoistic, or particularly religious (by far, most if not all the libertarians I personally know outside of the party are atheists), and would be none to heartbroken if a different - less restrictive governement replaced the US'. However, libertarianism would not require conserving or preserving, if anything, a libertarian is more of an iconoclast. (I also note that my tone seems unintentionally confrontational and if it comes off as such, I apologise, I simply didn't have the time to edit this for presentation as I usually do).-- 22:40, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Reminder
I'm aware. I've only taken a brief look at your nomination thus far, and it looks like there are a few opposes, or concerns so don't be surprised if I don't close it immediately so I can look at what all is being said. --Whiplash 22:43, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

thank you =D
it's great to be back, and you did an enormous favor for me when i was blocked =D

on another note, why have the level 2/3 headers changed? O_O the titlebar seems slightly...slimmed down,
 * nonono. i mean't like where you put two equals (==) to denote a level 2 header, i wasn't talking about you changing that on my talk page, it seems it's affected the entire RSW, like the titlebar seems slightly skinnier if you know what i mean O_O

i see...but it seems like the "edit" button at the right is also smaller. also, take a look at this page, don't some of the headers seem kind of...small?

hmmm...ok nvm then i guess =D

NVM lol i know what's the problem now! it was cuz my skin was set to moonlight, not the default monaco sapphire, which i presume is yours right now. but i had it set for moonlight like 2 weeks before, and it seems this "small" error only occurred today after the editing lockdown. i guess i'll have to bring this up with the wikia staff Fruit.Smoothie 01:46, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

+Sysop
Congratulations on your succesful nomination. I have given you sysop privaleges, and taken care of all the other silly work associated with promotion. Hopefully your new green color will appear soon. If you have any questions on your tools feel free to ask. Congratulations again. --Whiplash 18:40, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFailure. D: -- 19:56, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * All users turn into failures when they become sysops. It's inevitable.

"BAHAHAHA U IS AMIN NAO LUSER"

- Psycho Robot 03:15, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

-- 20:00, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * --Coolnesse 20:35, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're part of rollback and sysop because Whiplash is a narb >.> -- 20:40, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Congrats! -- 22:24, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats! 03:43, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!!!?!!! 05:18, April 13, 2010 (UTC) Gratz liquid helm 06:18, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, fellow Asian.  20:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Quick question
Sysop does include rollback, see Special:ListGroupRights. On [ Special:ListUsers] the only other sysop that's also explicitly in the rollback group is User:Frede173. I suppose you could ask a bureaucrat to fix it although I'm unaware of any technical side-effects of being in both groups. By the way, the cache for ListUser hasn't updated yet so you're not listed as a sysop at the moment -- 20:53, April 12, 2010 (UTC)