User talk:Soldier 1033

Leave a message &darr;

Spam
Mmkkk I get it now! 05:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Curse you and your talk page stalking ways! 05:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, what about talk page stalking? 05:02, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh nothing..*trips Ajr and Powers on their way out the door* ^^ 05:05, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * This spam was so insincere it made me cry. You are not a spammer sir. You are a grumpy guy. When you spam out of spite instead of out of sheer delight in the mayhem, you make flowers wilt and fruit go bad. :c 05:14, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am now a sad panda. Do not forget the nice things I did for you, sir!  05:17, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha! You fool! I reread that nomination hoping to find a spelling mistake to nag you with, but you said I undo edits instead of rolling back to assume good faith when in fact... the only reason I undid... was because I hadn't bothered to request rollback yet! if I had it, I'd have rolled back everything! Your trust was misplaced, and your hopes and dreams shall go unfulfilled! 05:23, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're fired, son. Get out of my house! 05:24, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your signature is so small. I can hardly read it. *squints* you should make it, like, 3x bigger. 05:26, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe your eyes are just small. Muahahahaha! 05:29, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Funny how easy that is to get rid of without violating DDD  05:45, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I counter with RS:GTS! 05:51, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh touché, good sir! I was almost ready to accept defeat, but then I hired the guy that trained Rocky and he told me to keep on going no matter how hard I get hit. So, with that, I am counterattacking with RS:UCS! It's super effective! 05:53, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't feed me. The only winning move is not to play. 05:58, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have a better idea. Click here for free pr0nz!!! 06:00, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Eww! No one likes that kind of pr0nz! Er, sorry. I'm not here to judge anyone, not even a pervert like you. 06:07, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, were you around when Mr. Vandal bot came? 06:09, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was still congealing in the viscous genetic solvent that people like me are spawned in. 06:12, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I do that for the sake of consistency! 18:49, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant consistency within my signature! If I uses span formatting, I might as well use span formatting for everything after all! who cares if it 12 extra characters?! 19:32, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did I?
 * http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/9880/drevil.gif
 * 21:42, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're trying to strongarm me into voting! Did you ever consider that I could still be undecided?! *is hurt* :c 21:44, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Wikiclean
Epic -- 00:12, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd like to place an order for a wikiclean. 00:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Noes, it was done by tlul, not me. He was calling me a noob. *hides in closet* 00:33, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it a real extension? What does it do? 01:06, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs to be one. Most of these edits are filthy. Especially this one. 01:47, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Request for reopening
Hey Andrew, I'm requesting the reopening of Forum:Change DBAN to DBAD for the following reasons:
 * The thread was open for approximately a week.
 * Consensus was not overwhelming; while many of the early voters supported the change, many of the later ones did not. It seems to me, as a neutral observer (and one who supported the change), that most of the early supporters were not necessarily supporting changing to DBAD, but more affirming that DBAN was unacceptable.
 * The closer (yourself) was not neutral during the discussion, and you were the most fervent supporter of the change. While it is not a true "requirement" for the closing sysop to remain neutral during the course of the discussion, it may lead some to believe there is a conflict of interest.
 * The premature closure of the thread will inevitably lead to more threads on the matter (already, one has sprung up.)

Thank you for the consideration,

18:37, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you.  00:39, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

I thought I should mention that it wasn't a good idea to have you close the discussion. Closing it as a biased party, you're not protecting the integrity of community consensus. Some of the opposers will no doubt believe that you are abusing the tools you are given as a sysop. 19:58, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you feel that way, but that doesn't change the fact that it was going around in circles and need to be closed. Regardless of who closed it, it needed to be closed. 01:27, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * If it needed to be closed, get a neutral admin to do it. Would you like it if I closed Forum:No full protection for userpages as successful, while having supported it myself?
 * I'm not going to spend time worrying about what's already been done, Caleb. DBAD is an essay now. Time to focus on the present. 02:26, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you can't provide a decent explanation for your actions, then don't do it in the future. Do not forget that you are not higher than the community, and you don't make the choices for the community either. 02:40, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Caleb, I never said I was higher than the community and I never said I made choices for the community. I would very much appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth. Now, there is absolutely no actual guideline that says you have to be a neutral sysop to close a discussion. It is general practice, yes, but it is not required. I'm sorry if you are upset, but this is not something to debate. As I said, what's done is done, and in that particular case I did what I did to end the pointless arguing as quickly as possible. Please do not make this out to be something it isn't. It's offending to me. 02:52, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to walk away from this, as with many others, I'm getting nowhere talking to you. Your role as a sysop includes being fair at all times. If it takes me a large amount of effort just to have you say "Hmm, alright, I suppose having a neutral admin close the discussion would be fairer to all the parties involved.", then it's not worth my time. 03:02, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * You've clearly made this out to be something it isn't. I've already explained why I did what I did and you insist on accusing me of "being higher than the community", "making choices for the community", and bunch of other irrelevant nonsense. Next time you want to accuse me of something on my talk page, expect a rebuttal. I have had more than enough of this crap for one month. 03:23, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Thank you for closing that
Not a problem. The re-hashing of previously addressed issues in the YG drives me crazy; I couldn't stand to leave that one open. -- 01:32, July 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * My thread's topic wasnt about dick or noob, it was about removing the essay all together. I dont care if the other thing had 500 supporters to one, my thread was about a different issue. Is this not clear?


 * regarding assumptions, halo clearly said on the other thread that he intrepreted "dick" to mean "harsh trolling". At no point am i claiming that that other thread wasn't going to pass, nor am i claiming theres anything wrong with it passing. As i said this is a seporate issue. 01:41, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Reporting bad ads
Is there a way I can report ads for RWT?

Re:Lol
Oh, sure. But I gotta leave for a bit, how about you delete them? 19:28, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I realise that, but I figured that it was so long ago they will have moved on and forgot all about the wiki. Also can't we just reblock them without the ability to post on their talk pages? Shouldn't we do that instead? 19:44, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yea? Tell me where I used it, fool! 17:25, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I suspect you saw an edit that I made ages ago back when I was a silly little edit bunny. 17:57, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I have to hunt it down and prove you wrong! 19:59, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Defining administrators
That would be wonderful, there are two sections remaining; Role of counter vandalism & Perception and RS:AEAE. I'll also assume you've read the job description on the others' talkpages.-- 20:18, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent, all I need now is to find someone to take on Perception and RS:AEAE. Also, if you've read my edit to Caleb talkpage, you'll see that due to the order I'd like to start this in (basically the order I managed to think of the topics as I wrote them on the page), your section will be going first. I'd like to set a star date of next Friday if possible in order to utilise as much of the summer months as is left when many off our users tend to have free time and would be able to contribute more effectively. If this is either too little time or too much time for you to get the affairs in order please let me know so that I may adjust accordingly.-- 20:38, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

GOLDENTICKETAMG@@@@@@@@
No thanks. :) 20:27, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * nom nom nom salt 20:29, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * nooooooooeeeeeeeeeeees 20:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, 'cause lots of people would oppose. And while I could use the tools, I don't really /need/ them atm. 20:36, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno, but people would still bring up the bot incident from months ago. Even though people should now know that that was an isolated incident. Trust me, I've been through (and passed) ~8 RfAs and RfBs, I know when the time is right ;) 20:39, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rawr
But... that's so much more to type ! Fine, I'll use those from now on (if I can remember ) Thanks for telling me.

21:22, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Block me
Perm block me from this wikia... 21:49, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do it... I'm through attempting to discuss anything on this wiki again... 21:54, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

A Question
Are you confused?

Explanation for why you may be here. And if you are, you need to update your userbox ^_-


 * I just remembered that thread being by someone else, and then saw the name changed, and then saw that you didn't update your userbox template, and didn't know if it was actually you o_o 05:38, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Response to my userpage
If I'm doing anything wrong please tell me. I'll fix it right away.

Jeffwang16 15:51, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Improving Inter-fansite Communication
A changed proposal has been submitted, you may wish to reconsider you stance on this issue. Thanks 04:40, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Stop putting the admin list at the top
We seriously have no reason at all even to have the list on the page, and its a pain in the ass to scroll past an ever longer and longer list of names to get to the part we NEED. --Degenret01 03:29, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Role of counter vandalism
Perhaps it'd be a good idea to have a section on unblock requests (since after all, administrators are supposed to be able to account for their blocks and deal with the requests)? 07:54, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re:That soccer dude
Heh, it probably would have been. I have no idea why I chose to re-block him, I even took all the time to spell check my block summary so I wouldn't look stupid -- 04:35, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Concerned Bystander
Twigy is having errors with wiki and can't edit, but he wanted me to post the following here: "Andrew! This is not like you. You are normally calm. What is with you?! From Twigy/Man tag." So there you go. 06:43, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Andrew, 3RR can only be invoked with more than three reverts on any one page within 24 hours, wszx. Only has three.-- 06:46, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, that was a mistake on my part. Their misuse of rollback was ridiculous, though. 06:47, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rollback is considered the same as reverting without a reason. He should have a given a reason, so I guess you have that.  Now, I'd like to add something.  I am on NO ONE'S side.  I am going to be as fair as I can to everyone.  I would suggest that you take a break, you don't have to listen to me, but it could do you some good right now.  You are playing Judge, Jury, and Executioner, as I said on Harle's talk.  That's why we need other opinions.  You are taking this way over the top, and it's only going to bite you in the ass in the end.  I want to help you, but you are going to have to slow down a bit.  I disagree with your thread, and I don't think it's going to accomplish what you want it to, but I still understand where you are coming from.  Just slow down man, I'm begging you to do that if nothing else.  I truly don't want anything bad to come out of this.   06:58, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE:AIDS
I reminded me of Rucka Rucka Ali: 295rk7z53dE 08:14, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uh... its sponsored by a foundation of some kind. 08:19, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe that sounds like the outcome of one of your threads. 08:29, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:AMG HALP@@@@@@@@@@@
I fixed the problem it was someone obviously vandalised Exchange:Pure essence, maybe all the exchange pages that the CTI is worked out from should be protected otherwise this could happen very easily again. 09:33, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * noes everything is asploding 14:06, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * AMG its 2012 we all gonna di!!@$  18:29, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE: The year is 1929..
I think someone fixed it

I put some useful data at User:Quarenon/CTI which contains the prices of each CTI component and their last change, making it easy to revert vandalism that shows in the CTI. -- 21:50, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Lying, cheating, mass muters, suck ups = all mods
Just giving you the heads up. Degen closed it. For a poor reason imo. 00:14, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Regarding your comments on (wszx)'s talk page
Soldier, there was a reason why I left my message on (wszx)'s talkpage and not yours. Simply put, I find it difficult to communicate anything to you. I will elaborate on my comment further and explain my reasoning, but if you want to debate it out, I will not continue. Take this with a pinch of salt if you want to, but keep in mind that I only want the best for the Wiki as a whole, and am not calling you out because of any personal grudge, and am not looking to start any drama.

To start off, perhaps I phrased it incorrectly, but it was not my intention to say that you weren't taking responsibility for your actions. I was pointing out the fact that you are expected to be responsible for your actions, and saying "Nobody's perfect" is something I find, irrelevant.

I am allowed to comment on your actions if I see a need to, and I certainly saw the need to when I read (wszx)'s talkpage. Again, I reiterate, there was a reason I left the message on (wszx)'s talkpage, because it wasn't directed at you, it was my input for the discussion there.

I ask that you take this with a little offence as possible, but if you notice, you often accuse others of putting words in your mouth, when often, it isn't the case. Right now, I point out to you that I can easily say something along the lines of "I never said I was your parent and never said it was my job to lecture and reprimand you, and I certainly never said that I was in charge of you" if I wanted to. But would I? I wouldn't, because it isn't really true, and that sort of accusatory tone only adds fuel to the fire, and also because I believe it's digressing from the issue at hand. Also, assume the assumption of good faith.

Perhaps, like some others, I have been finding some of your actions to be rather irrational (not that I'm expecting you to agree with me on this point), and honestly speaking, I did find you more logical back in '08/'09. Just as an example, I found you overly authoritative when handling the situation with Composite, not with the block, but with the threat you gave him. Yes, it is our responsibility to moderate discussions, especially when they are becoming heated, and your actions were justified to a certain extent. But notice how this is phrased: "You will knock off the personal attacks or I will block you. Understood? Good." It may be an honest mistake on your part, but even I could see how that only served to antagonise the situation further. Tlul's warning was enough really, but if you wanted to add on to his comment, something along the lines of "As a warning, please refrain from making personal attacks, it only serves to make the discussion more heated." would have been more tasteful. The way you phrased it, sounded like an order, as if you were higher than him. The bit at the end ("Understood? Good.") didn't help either, it made it seem like you were belittling him further. Which is why, I can sympathise with Composite and see why he would reply with "LMFAO, please get over your power trip." (not that he should have, of course) You may choose to take note of the points I mentioned, or ignore it entirely, but please refrain from accusing me of parenting you, because we are both aware that that was never my intention.

I know that both of us are trying to work towards the good of the Wiki, which is why I hope to resolve this as amicably as possible. You can ask that I clarify any of the points above, but if this turns into a debate, I'm not going to continue. Thanks. 12:09, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

FluffyBunnyBot Error
I just wanted to let you know that FluffyBunnyBot blanked a page here. 20:47, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * And here as well. 20:49, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Whats wrong with?
Whats wrong with using and for strikethroughs? FluffyBunnyBot is replacing them with a long version, and  01:03, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * The former is deprecated HTML. In plain English, it means that we just don't use it anymore for no real reason :P 01:20, July 24, 2010 (UTC)