RuneScape:Featured images

Featured images are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words," the images featured on the Main Page should illustrate a Wiki article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured image criteria. All currently featured images can be found in the featured images gallery.

Nominating

 * If you believe an image should be featured, please add it below to the "Current nominations" section.
 * Conversely, if you believe that an image should be "unfeatured", add it to the "Nominations for delisting" section.
 * For promotion, if an image is listed here for about seven days with three or more reviewers in support (excluding the nominator(s)) and the consensus is in its favour, it can be added to the list.
 * If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis.
 * If you are nominating a previously nominated image, make sure you add link(s) to previous nominations. A historical list of nominations is stored in the archives.

Image criteria

 * The image is used in an article.
 * Unless the image is used elsewhere in the wiki, it will not be accepted. This is to prevent "orphaned images".
 * The image is taken from RuneScape game client, by wiki users.
 * Non-free images used under the "Fair use" condition should not be nominated.
 * The image file size is less than 100kb.
 * This is to facilitate users with slower connections, and to reduce lag.
 * Larger images may be used, provided the thumbnails are within this limit.
 * The image is moderately sized.
 * The size is recommended to be larger than 75x75, but smaller than 250x250 pixels.
 * For larger images, use a thumbnail which is within these sizes.
 * The image is in compliance with the Images and media policy.

How to nominate
See the following example:

Example
Description: Sample description.

Reason: Sample reason.

Expiry:


 * Support - As nominator. ~

Note to nominators (READ THIS BEFORE NOMINATING)

 * Describe the image. The description should describe the image itself, and not anything else.  Note that the description appears on the Main Page. 
 * Be neutral. The description should not be biased, and avoid superlatives, such as "most", "greatest", "best", etc.
 * Be creative. Descriptions beginning with "A picture of..." and "A view of..." are not appropriate and should be avoided.
 * Avoid redundancy. Do not repeat the "title" of the image in the description. Try reading the title and the description together to see how it sounds. For example,  Kharidian Desert, a shimmering oasis  sounds better than  Kharidian Desert, a shimmering oasis in the Kharidian Desert .
 * Use it first. Please make sure the image is used in the mainspace before nominating.

How to vote

 * Support as nominator
 * Support/Oppose/Neutral - with reasons
 * Weak support/oppose - with reasons
 * Comment - to provide comments

Statistics
What type of images do you think should be featured more? NPCs Monsters Locations Scenery Others

Total images: 64

K'ril Tsutsaroth


Description: The most brutal general of Zamorak.

Reason: Great detail and angle.

Expiry:
 * Support - As nom. 18:54, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I agree on the detail, but the angle is hideous if you ask me. 18:56, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It looks good and the detail is quite good as well but the angle is really bad. 20:09, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Great angle there. --Coolnesse 22:30, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Support - I personally think the angle is great, I also love the way his mouth seems to be open, as if he were roaring at someone or something. 22:38, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - He's firing his laser. -- 22:43, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rofl! 11:24, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

00:14, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - The angle is great and I love the roaring pose but the colours are quite plain and I have seen much better pictures of K'ril. Fix the colours and you have my support


 * Support - I don't really like the angle or the open mouth, but the pros outweigh the cons. 00:13, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - The detail is great and the transparency was done very well, but I hate the angle. Of course, it may be a bit difficult to get him right when he wanders around (gosh that is annoying). Also, some body parts are hidden, such as his right "leg" and horn, which annoys me. This is more of a side view, but I'd like a ¾ view with Kal'Gerion Demons; between side- and front view, OK?  04:53, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Great picture but it's to evil and bad looking for a featured image in my opinion. 00:15, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't consider being too evil a criterion for a Featured Image. 17:29, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - Per smelly. Coelacanth0794 00:23, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Bulwark beast


Description: A moss-covered Behemoth with some strong armour.

Reason: Well, there goes, buddy. Two behemoths unsuccesful, one more to go. I think that the detail is great and so is the angle. Dennis did a very nice job on the transparency! I like those block-thingies covering its body, along with the moss and its reddish belly. Its paws also look fantastic and the eyes look very menacing, the face being covered by those... plates... To summarise, I just like it a lot.

Expiry:


 * Support - As OMNOMNOMinator. 16:25, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - As much as I dislike having to oppose any image, this is too blocky for my likes. Sorry. Coelacanth0794 16:27, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Just a mass of rock. Just a mass of rock with a tail. 17:30, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * And what if I say that it's got a tail?  18:14, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Happy now? 19:26, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * rofl! 12:47, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Otherworldly beings
Description: The habitat of the Otherworldy Beings

Reason: It has a good mix of colours and the plants make it look good.

Expiry:


 * Support - As nominator. 10:43, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Otherworldly being (2)
Description: A creature that's out of this world!

Reason: It uses one of those animations that happens every so often. Has a nice angle. And shows the new look of the Otherworldly being.

Expiry:


 * Support - As nominator. 07:54, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Note - The previous discussion has been archived as the image was changed during the nomination. 05:42, June 7, 2010 (UTC)~
 * Strong support - What the--! Well, here we go again... >.< 12:49, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Enchanted Valley
Description: The mysterious valley of the centaurs.

Reason: This image is shows more of the valley and is more interesting than just a waterfall.

Expiry:


 * Support - As nominator. 14:56, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Camoninja12. And... My image! :) Felipebrs 15:12, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I like the waterfall more than two centaurs, a wood dryad, a stag, a rock and some trees. Of course, they do look great. Perhaps we could feature both? 16:43, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Extremely strong oppose - Why the hell would I support two ugly centaurs replacing an awesome waterfall image? 18:07, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Two ugly centaurs and a stag.  18:27, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Two ugly centaurs and an ugly stag. 19:28, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * rofl 04:56, June 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose replacement, Support new FIMG - <--- Basically, Don't replace what isn't broken, instead, replicate it. Make them both FIMGs. I love them both =) 18:42, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Looks like someone slapped the centaur on the ass and made him bleed. -- 19:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I lol'd. 19:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ditto Coelacanth0794 00:23, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Idem   05:53, June 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose replacement, Support new FIMG - Per Gradius, lmao at the smelly one. 23:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Support - The new Image represents alot more then the old one, and the waterfall is good image but it is mostly unrelated to the article and so should be replaced as it does not conform to the FIMG ideals, must make a statement about the article and just a waterfall does not do that 02:40, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - You've sawed off the waterfall and the white thing *rabbit* on the right is showing it's arse. -- 04:02, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - There are two ugly centaurs and a beautiful watefall? What's the point. 08:03, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - For a moment, I thought you wanted to replace the ugly green picture with the beautiful waterfall. 20:25, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose replacement, Support new FIMG - Per above.  00:10, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per the cloud monster Coelacanth0794 16:31, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hm, the image seems to have changed. 05:50, June 7, 2010 (UTC)