User talk:Azaz129/Archive7

Please only post relevant discussion, no templates or holiday greetings please.

98.156.54.139
2 months is Dharoking a Chicken. 2 months for their first day of vandalism is too much. They aren't a page move vandal, simply being immature. We have had far more disruptive users blocked for less time. I can settle for 2 weeks, but 2 months is absurd. The likelihood of the users returning is slim at that. 01:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've left a message on your talk, they also are quite simliar to a proxy IP vandal yesterday.-- 01:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Upon reviewing it, I see what you mean. I was unaware of the proxy from yesterday, though. 01:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Transparency
Certainly. I'll get right to work on it. =) 02:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Custom Games‎
Would you please contribute your opinion here ? I don't think it would suffice as an article, but since you have a better knowledge than I do, maybe you should say if its ok or not.;) 01:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello. well i just want to know what it would be great for. what space for it please. I am updating some more games right now by the way coaster3000@gmail.com 19:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC) I just finished it and i would like a review before i move it. So can someone please check it out to see if it meets standerds and stuff thanks  20:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

RuneScape:Requests_for_adminship/Bonziiznob
I just posted [this] message there, looking for a B'crat response. --Degenret01 11:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

deletion
new quest i started why was it deleted--Superior demonic 11:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What the? Are you psychic? You were able to create a quest before it was going to be released. Was it already displayed in the front page? And sorry azaz for using your talk page discussing with the other person. 11:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

was released 8mins before update, all info was correct, i guess im not allowed to start new pages, i write for another fansite, i guess they can have advance knowledge, i sometimes have insted

lol
Edit:Removed offensive content, possibly by Blankothe3rd 12:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

»
« 19:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Trolls
If a user is permanently blocked, they may still appeal their block by adding Template:Unblock to their talk page. The user block policy specifies: "Blocked editors who wish to appeal their block can add the Unblock template to their talk page." I wasn't sure whether this applied only to temporarily blocked users or permanently banned users, so I brought it up on the Yew Grove (second paragraph). The responses seemed to suggest that permanently blocking someone without giving them the opportunity to appeal is unfair. I'm not saying anyone will support Blanko's appeal, in fact my impression is that nobody would be enthusiastically behind it. Then again, I note that you say he had the opportunity to appeal for two months, and chose not to use that time productively in improving his standing.

Perhaps what is needed is to give permanently banned users a reasonable fixed time-frame in which to state their case for their appeal, and then (if the appeal is rejected), take the step to protect even their talk page. If this is a good idea then it needs to be enshrined in the policy, which at the moment is a little vague. In this case, feel free to re-protect the page in question in the name of ignoring all rules. Now that I think about it, I probably should have brought it up with you first, as you protected his page in October. Sorry about that, my bad. :-|  22:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, duly noted. ;-)  I had a feeling that policy needed updating, especially looking at the guide to blocking times - I understand (from my discussion with Calebchiam that in practice most people are much less forgiving of even isolated cases.  If that works in practice then the policy should reflect it.   23:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

RE:Protection
Oops! I didn't remember that part. :P

Thanks. ^_^ 23:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I would like to obtain the Rollback tool, while this message may be more than necessary to ask it, I would be pleased to have this extra function (even though it is quite similar to the "Undo" button). Thank you for your taking the time to read this short message. 03:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

YG Discussion
It appears that closure is needed in the de-ranking of Stinko discussion. Apparently from what I read and hear from users in CC, C Teng is refusing to de-rank Stinko. Perhaps you could review the discussion and close it. Something like this is doing more harm than good staying open longer, and a decision needs to be made. The majority of the contributors are in favor of De-ranking him, yet Teng will do nothing. Please assist? 04:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Old Admins
Hey! Wow has this place changed. But I am surprised there are no new admins after 2 months. How have you been? Are they treating ya fairly? Cheers, 15:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Congrats on 'cratship too! 16:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikidrama, thats new! It is amazing how many admins have left over time because of change and how many have came because of it. I would hate for this place to lose its sense of community it had when I came. If we're gonna have deep and meaningful conversation come on IRC. 16:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

crats
hi azaz I have a question.

why we cant have more crats on wiki?

I think im too direct =P -- 02:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

K and it is possible to have another crat someday? oh and ty -- 04:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Easter
Hi, This is a bit early but because I am going away soon: 08:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiCat
I see you deleted Template:WikiCat. May I ask why? It was not offensive, there was nothing wrong with it, so what is the reasoning behind it?13:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for doing that requested move and addition to the old forum archieve. Now they all look a lot more like the current threads in YG and are ready for inclusion, if consensus says it should be done. 21:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Youdead00
Well,I was GOING to say happy easter,but I have a diffrent thing to ask. Are you going to the wikifes???

Mod-related clans
Hey, I just wanted to run something by the bureaucrats here, and you happened to be the first one on the list. Anyways, this does not appear to be much of a problem at the moment at all, but there are some specifically runescape moderator-run clan chats that I know the owners would prefer not be posted here primarily due to spammers that decide to join these clans just for the sake of annoying players and moderators alike who are trying to better the runescape community. From my experience in some of them, these spammers are easily dealt with, but can end up setting at least one ranked person back a bit in the clan in dealing with the spammers. I only saw one mention of one so far (I "brushed over" this while leaving the meaning/whatnot of what was posted), but all members of these would prefer that the groups remain anonymous here if at all possible. The initials of the 2 main ones that I know of are "A B" and "L A" if that helps you any (I prefer not to mention it even here, if not just because several players incorrectly believe that being in one of them will allow them to get modded).

If you want any more info on why, please feel free to message me back. If not, could you mention this to the other bureaucrats/admins?  I am the Lhikan! ( TaLk ) 02:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for understanding and thanks from the rest of us as well ; ) 24.242.219.150 13:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I wrote a very long section on a talk page about AB. It seems it may have been deleted from the talk page. I've noticed people tend to edit any mention of the chat out of talk and userpages. Ironically, what I wrote was just about that and the conversation I had with the operator of the clan chat back when vandalism by vigilante AB users. He said he would ask users not to edit chat mentions out of talk and userpages. Apparently people have begun to forget that. We respect that he does not want mentions in any articles. We however have wiki rules against censoring talk pages. 06:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Need some help
Hey, I was going through the bagged plants for construction and found some with different types of info boxes. Can you tell me which I should use? It looks like theres an old info box called "construction" which is more specific but lacks GE price. While the other is the standard info box but lacks construction info like "hot spot" etc. Examples: Bagged_sunflower and Bagged_daffodils. I would assume they should all be using the standard info box and then putting the additional construction info into the article (level, XP, room and hotspot). I'm fairly new here and don't want to go through changing them all to either one without being sure. Thanks,   Luvdogmilk   17:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, can you please let me know the conclusion or leave me a link to the discussion on my page.   Luvdogmilk   18:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Rimmington meadow.
Hi Azaz, I think we dont have to delete it just convine it with the rimmington page it maybe be better?

-- 23:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Revert changes
Hello again. :) I noticed one of my userboxes has gone strange. I've looked at the template and a user edited it today, breaking it some how in the process. I tried fixing it myself but its hard to tell amongst so much code. From the histroy it looks like they tried to change it back to how it was but without success. Can you remove all their changes so its the same code as before? Link to template and link to how it looks. Thanks,    Luvdogmilk   19:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Looks like my original change did fix the problem it just took a LONG time to take effect. Must say, wikia servers don't seem all that great. Anyway all is fine now. :)   Luvdogmilk   23:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Active users category
I have recently made a category called active users. I was wondering what would be the best way to let people know about it. Putting messages on people's talk pages would take far too long and adding everyone myself would be a drag. I don't know who can, but can you place a note on the top screen? (the one where all the notices are ie: Wikia are having an event where ... etc). This would be good sitting next to Rswfan's Active user list. The category would also be helpful as it would probably be easier to link to. Cheers! 19:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcoming
Is it really necessary to welcome new users that haven't contributed at all? Not trying to sound rude, which I know it may sound like, but, is it necessary? -- 23:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay...; No, and no. Oh, and here's a vandal for you to take care of. -- 23:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Holiday greetings!
Joke =)

Seeing as how you are the only admin/crat online, can you tell me what is the difference between and  ? 01:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

MechScape Wiki
I see you were enquiring as to what happened on the MechScape Wiki. I was blocked as part of the vandalism so am responding here. That was Dragongnexux vandalising the Wiki himself. He was taunting me while he was doing it, so there is no question as to him being in control of the account. Also, once he has finished, he told me I would see what building a Wiki from the beginning was like. I think this may have had something to do with recent discussions Bonziiznob and others, making him unhappy. I hope this doesn't upset any relationships between the Wikis. Theboy1001 19:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok. I guess that auto-block would have been set by the vandal in question. Hopefully, someone from the Central Wiki will take action soon and revert everything. Theboy1001 19:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Forum:Abolish the Newspaper
The discussion on this is rather interesting seeing as it's turned more into a discussion about how to achieve a consensus rather then about the actual newspaper. Might I suggest, to satisfy those questioning consensus, a notice of intent be placed. 00:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. As you suggested 3-5 days, I offered a notice of intent for 4 on the forum. 02:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Checkuser
Awesomeownage admitted that he was a sockpuppet of Shadow Veto and was blocked, but he threatened to create another account. I know that a Shadow Veto2 was created in the past, so I was wondering if you would mind running a checkuser on him so we can ban his IP. Thanks ahead of time, 02:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, always happy to help. 23:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Just wondering
Is it against the rules to create a user page to redirect to another userpage? Please check User:Yodapen6‎ for me.=) It's gonna redirect you to User:Scimitar77 01:01, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Joshhy is Mad
Grr. You User:Joshhy You Made my thign go away =(

Rollback
Is it possible that I could get RB rights ? Thanks 10:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Oops..
I was thinking U.S. Central time instead of UTC. 03:58, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandals. Grr.
Ip's:78.171.183.21, 74.209.41.156 the second might be Blackhole252 logged out please check, he blanked blackholes userpage. Both on RS:CVU14:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)