User talk:Claws402/archive 1

Just delete my fucking account then. Editing my own talk page is perfectly justifiable, and this all started because I attempted to right an obvious wrong that very few others seemed to realize and it lead to me pointlessly being harassed on MY OWN talk page by 2 admins and someone who i'm not even sure who has any jurisdiction over me. Seriously, just ban me or something, or tell me how to ban myself, the community on this page is sincere and utter bullshit.
 * Are you sure? Like I said before you can put the deletion of that page to a vote if you want. But you can't just delete a page because you think it doesn't work. If you really want to be blocked I can do that. ʞooɔ 01:52, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

{| class="toc" id="toc" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);"

Contents
[hide] *1 ummmm
 * 2 Nonexistence
 * 3 RE
 * 4 RS:GTS and RS:DDD
 * }

ummmm Edit
You have failed to explain adequately why we don't need the page and I highly doubt you will. The page is a target for numerous redirects of items popularly believed to exist. Why were you insisting adamantly that it should be deleted and not restored? Mol ManClws402  00:57, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Due to the fact that if an item does not exist, it will not be on the rune wiki. if someone searches for an item and gets no result, it is abundantly clear that the item is, in fact, nonexistant. Claws402 (talk) 01:01, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * That's not a definite answer, all it means is that we don't have a page for whatever they were looking for. Mol ManClws402  01:02, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

NonexistenceEdit
Look, I don't care how useless you think that page is. What I do care about is that you start following our policies, specifically the one specifying that you Do Not Delete Discussions. If you keep blanking that talk page, we're going to have problems.  AnselaJonla   01:04, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

I believe as firmly as you do that this wiki should be clean, concise, neat, and free of vandalism. The talk page was in violation of the rules moreso than I was when I deleted it. "Nonexistance" is a redundant page and most of the people discussing on it seem to lack any sort of basic intelligence. I was just making it known. Claws402 (talk) 01:09, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * So, there are multiple problems with the statements and actions you've made: first, that was the talk page, not the actual article. More important and relevant to the task at hand, there are plenty of cases where someone would search for an item that does indeed exist, but not find a page on it. However unfortunate, that has always been the case and likely always will be. Besides long-term content we might be missing, there are also issues with recently released items, items that only show up in QuickChat and are not encountered in-game, and versions of items that redirect to a page we have (case in point, Ivandis flail (30), which until recently was not a page on here.) Do you see the problem with having the default position of "the article for this item doesn't exist, therefore the item most certainly doesn't exist"? I sure do, and I think most people would as well.
 * In any case you are free to request its deletion. ʞooɔ 01:16, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, so please stop trying to blank your talk page. It serves no purrpose and only makes you look belligerent. <span style="color:rgb(0,43,184);">ʞo<span style="color:rgb(0,43,184);">oɔ 01:28, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * I wish to blank my page so that useful things can be posted and seen. This talk fills the first screen of my page.
 * I wish to blank my page so that useful things can be posted and seen. This talk fills the first screen of my page.

RE Edit
<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0);">That's okay, because I have the habit of responding on the poster on their own talk page.

<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0);">I am not a "white knight"; I am an editor who is upholding the simplest of policies which you are in direct violation of.

<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0);">If you're really that tormented by this mess into which you've gotten yourself, make an archive; you'll still have to link to it from this page, however. <span style="color:rgb(255,248,220);text-shadow:rgb(0,0,17)1px1px0px,rgb(0,0,17)2px1px0px;">Mol Man<span style="color:rgb(17,0,136);font-size:9px;">Clws402  01:39, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * No seriously stop, you are not too far from losing your editing abilities entirely. I don't know why you keep persistent after being told numerous times by numerous people (two of whom are admins).  <span style="color:rgb(255,248,220);text-shadow:rgb(0,0,17)1px1px0px,rgb(0,0,17)2px1px0px;">Mol Man<span style="color:rgb(17,0,136);font-size:9px;">Clws402 01:42, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * We have a few simple rules to make easier to look at old communications. The most important of those is that you can't just remove stuff off your talk page. It's not like your Facebook wall -- it doesn't belong to you. We try to explain this to people who break the rule and usually they don't blank their talk anymore (even if they might not agree with the rule). You seem like a high-energy person and that could be helpful here, but if you can't stop deleting your talk page (i.e. next time) you'll be blocked. It's just a nuisance. <span style="color:rgb(0,43,184);">ʞo<span style="color:rgb(0,43,184);">oɔ 01:46, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

RS:GTS and RS:DDDEdit
<p style="color:rgb(0,0,0);">Hi, it's a gross loophole to do what you've done in an attempt to hide your talk page. You can't do that. If the talk page really torments you, you may create an archive (here) and move its contents there, but regardless, it must remain linked from this page. <span style="color:rgb(255,248,220);text-shadow:rgb(0,0,17)1px1px0px,rgb(0,0,17)2px1px0px;">Mol Man<span style="color:rgb(17,0,136);font-size:9px;">Clws402  19:01, March 25, 2013 (UTC)