User talk:Soldier 1033

Leave a message &darr;

Forum count
What is yours?

Mine is:

http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt355/Liamreffell4/LIAMREFFELL4POSTCOUNT.png

08:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * http://i537.photobucket.com/albums/ff331/Soldier_1033/Picture1.png
 * Over 9000!!!!! Nicely done :O 16:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Congratz! 20:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Rank Request
Perhaps it would only be fair to allow those presently with a strong support for rank to finish their running? 04:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi I am new to runescape wiki and a bit confused
Hi Soldier 1033. I was browsing user pages and saw some, like yours have pictures of your character but mine all deleted were :( Plz can you help me understand what is and what not is allowed?

TIA Perduta 05:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Fwuffy Bunny
Hey Soldier, first I'd like to thank you for voting on my RfF. Second, I'm about to get into this fwuffy bunny stuff. And since my level at photoshop is 1, can you make me a fwuffy bunny weawing a fowum admin cwown?


 * Thanks, anyways :D

Congratulations
Congratulations with the 3-year anniversary of the Construction skill! . 13:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Over 9000, again :(
http://i650.photobucket.com/albums/uu224/Frede173/over9000.png

Yep... BTW, the only editing i did was cut the sides off. 14:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollbacking
Heya, I'm not sure but.. if a summary says that a edit has been reverted, and changed to the last version of a other person.. then that is done with the rollback tool right? If so, then some1 been using it in the wrong way? :/ I never used rollback tool so sorry if I got it wrong. 19:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No, not really...I was doing the RIGHT thing. 19:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks. :'( 19:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok 19:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:UotM
Thanks Andrew. We've come a long way, you and I. Too bad I won't be as active of late seeing my new position, but I'm here every time I get the chance, even though it won't be to the articles or images as much anymore. Thanks again! 03:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: Hai dere
Ohai. Hope you're having fun. On the wiki, I see you've posted a message on most/all YG threads and new RfAs, so I guess you're up to date there.

As for in RS itself, last week's update was Hunt for Red Raktuber, the next quest in the Penguin series (though a bunch of other series' seem to jump in too). It gives a small bonus to Penguin Hide and Seek (one extra point per week), and a new hunter area.

This week's update is Rest (and other run energy updates), which was leaked awhile a go. I have yet to try it out, but it looks very promising - I like the idea of this thread - community ftw.

Hope that brings you up to date! =D 19:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * =D No problem. Oh and BTW rest is very very useful! 19:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:z0mg
Haven't read it yet; I've been really busy IRL. Will get to it though :) Butterman62 (talk) 21:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Finished it :D
That last Pendragon book was so awesome. I'm sad too, though. I want to read more of it. Butterman62 (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps that's because that was the way it was meant to be. :P Butterman62 (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, now that I think about it, they could have just cut off the story at page 580 (where Bobby's last journal ends). What was the point of that last part? Butterman62 (talk) 22:11, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Like he shouldn't have started writing his journals until the perspective from the very end? Butterman62 (talk) 15:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah well. I guess that is the way it was meant to be. XD Butterman62 (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

sorry did not mean to blank my page

we are having problems creating my signature and making it work

and i deleted it to test out on my talk page

Sir Erik54 Talk

Re: Requesting 1337 JavaScripter pl0x
Unfortunately, that would be very difficult to do. Rollback links require a token, and in order to get that token you need to contact the server. 23:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It was fun, there wasn't enough time to do everything though. :-( 23:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just Oahu. 01:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We saw the USS Missouri, we didn't have time for the USS Arizona memorial. 00:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I poked around a bit and found this. It's a fairly old and emulates a rollback by doing a series of reverts on an article. I haven't tested to see if it will work on Wikia. -- 04:26, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I've had a talk with a MW developer. Rollback links on RC have been added to the latest version of MediaWiki but Wikia may not upgrade for some time.  I've decided to go ahead and create a new user script that should implement rollback links in the mean time.  I'll test it over on another wiki and let you know when I've got something.  -- 04:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * A beta version of this is available. The script is located at User:Quarenon/rcrollback.js.  You can insert  in your monaco.js or wherever you put your custom scripts.  I'd appreciate it if you or another admin can confirm that this script works.  -- 06:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Go to your preferences and go to the recent changes tab. Disable enhanced recent changes and it should work.. I used it today, but reverted it because I'm more used to the current one. 14:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Still doesn't work. 14:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You bypassed the cache after you saved? If you did, check the recent changes again. The rollback should be after the edit summary. If not, I don't know what went wrong then.=/ 14:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Do the rollback links appear at all, or do they appear but do nothing when you click them? Also, can you provide the browser you are using?  Thanks -- 14:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello, I looked at the way you installed the script, and you missed a few lines when copying and pasting. The recommended way to install the script is to use  instead of copying the script itself (less likely to have copy and paste errors, and any fixes can be made in a centralized place).  I have an installation guide that should make the installation procedure clear.  -- 15:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The script should work now in enhanced mode. The only problem that remains is that AJAX has to be disabled in the checkbox near the top of the recent changes page.  It should work if you uncheck it but I am currently trying to get it to work with AJAX on. -- 23:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I will look into fixing the redundant links once I can get it to work with the AJAX option, although it has stumped me at the moment so the fixes will probably have to wait till tomorrow :( Also let me know if you actually manage to perform a rollback using the script--doing rollbacks from RC requires some special handling so it might not actually work.  I did successful testing on my own test wiki but sometimes problems crop up due to customizations over here.   -- 00:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Awesome. I have updated it to remove the redundant links, still no support for the AJAX option though.  -- 18:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

mi cookies
In general I just make them for females, cuz that's cool. But I made waaayyyy too many one batch, and since where he works they help those much less fortunate than us, I figured good enough reason for them to get some cookies. Soo, you gotta be a chick, or help those in need to get Murph cookies lolz.--Degenret01 03:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That would have to be a full total makeover lol, I'm not real down with guys wearing dresses and wigs.--Degenret01 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Umm, it was a joke man. --Degenret01 04:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Change your facebook profile pic to you in a dress in a parking lot (yes when its busy) and you get cookies.--Degenret01 04:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

RS:ER & Deletion of my monaco.js
Hey, could you add RuneScape:Editor Review to the community bar? And, also, could you delete my monaco.js? Cause, it doesn't work for some reason. 17:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: Sorry :(
It's okay. [(Now, I know this can be interperated both ways, but)] We did fine without you. Though, I suppose we would've done even finerer if you were there with us. 23:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

My signature
Andrew,

If its possible can someone then edit the range cape of accomplishment and make it so that it isnt like that?

i just took that image its only one image it just has 2 capes and the hood in the picture

it isnt 3 this is the file name

File:Ranging_cape.gif

idk how to crop it out if someone could do it on the range page then i would gladly change that link

Sir erik54 Talk  16:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

thank you we had a discussion in the clan chat and i figured that if it was one file it would be good. no problem worrying about it...it's your job to.

Sir erik54 Talk  23:19, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:??
The price wasn't right, as you can see here.

I understand that they did this in good faith, but if it was wrong, then why not undo/rollback? I will leave a message on their talk page if necessary.   Oli4burggraa  Talk 20:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay. Sorry.  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 07:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but those two words are the most important words in the whole article! I think that it is obvious that this user removed/changed these words on purpose.   Oli4burggraa  Talk 20:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * How can changing two very important words be good faith?  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 20:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * This user changed two very important things in the article: They stated that the Zamorak platebody has stats that aren't the same as the normal Rune plate's. This is plain wrong, and it could mislead people who intend to buy one. Also, they said that you can, in fact, smith Zamorak plates, which could mislead people into falling for the Trimming scam (even though it does not really exist anymore).  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 20:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ...Okay okay, I sincerely apologise. I read the RS:AGF multiple times, and, as far as I understood, this was not good faith. It is probably my 'fault' then.  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 20:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with you. It won't happen again, I promise. If it does, just take away my rollback or something, as it is then probably rightful.   Oli4burggraa  Talk 20:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, and you are right. A little question (not meant to be annoying), here, you undid an update to an Exchange page. You said that when the Last price is updated, the new price should of course also be. However, I think that the editor meant to show that the price is stable. Now, my question is: should the last price be edited when the price is stable, or only when there is a new price?  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 20:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Eh... They changed it from 276 to 275, right? Otherwise, I really need to get my eyes fixed.  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 20:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Haha, I knew you were going to post that on my talk. Yes, that was the most obvious case of vandalism and bad faith that I have seen today. I just wanted to add a semi-humourous (my sense of humour isn't that good) comment.   Oli4burggraa  Talk 20:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, it is a bit confusing, haha.  [[Image:Zaros_tally.PNG‎]]  Oli4burggraa  Talk[[Image:Runecrafter_hat_y.PNG‎]] 20:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Just a little question. I was right undoing this, because he had good faith (adding the max price, instead of the last price), right?   Oli4burggraa  Talk -  Sign 21:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:>.<
Lol! The conversation should die out soon. It violates a policy anyways. &#123;&#123;SUBST:Template:Signatures/bonziiznob}} 05:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

no
no I cannot type. keyboard broken=( 15:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The July issue of the RuneScape Wiki Post has been released. June still

I'm not sure thats right. It realeases on the 1st of July. 15:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I was linked to the July issue so I'm confused.. 15:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I thnk 2plus2equals4 Probably ask 4 Link -- 15:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL. I was about to remove the notice. I haven't even checked the issue for errors yet. It should only be released on 1 July, the beginning of the month. 15:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * see? :P-- 15:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that poorly written sentence=/. I discovered on screen keyboard now.=P.-- 03:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Heya
Wow, really? Are you sure that I've been around long enough for it? Sure, I'll give it a go, thank you so much for the offer. 14:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the nomination, it really means a lot to me. Also, do you think that the "assume good faith" conflict between you and me earlier on should be mentioned under a conflict? Thanks again. 14:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

re:your signature...
sure you can 22:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ty, but i undit coding went wrong at the end and colours were wierded out (my word). I use my iTouches all the time for editing wikia (i need a new one) 02:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollback misunderstandings
Heya, since you had the original idea I figure you have been dealing with more examples of people misusing it. If you would, please check out RuneScape:Rollback_Examples and add any examples I may have missed. I was keeping it to more general examples with the hope that people reading it will get the idea without us having to list every single thing. And I came to realize also that we really just need cases of when not to do it, the phrase "obvious vandalism" covers when to. Well, take a look if you would. And I am sorry I used the word "ridiculous" about your proposal. It certainly wasn't.--Degenret01 12:15, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Captain tom
The old upload doesn't work unless i upload second one and revert to the first.

I have no idea why it happens.