User talk:Joeytje50

Any useless chat should be placed at this page.

Juna/Stories
Hi Joey,

I noticed that you and Play crazy1 have been working on Juna/Stories. Unfortunately, the entire pages violates Jagex's copyright, and we've already decided that we don't allow dialogue pages, which the page very obviously is. Because of that, I have to delete it. I'm sorry you've worked so hard on this. 19:24, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Raven images
Are you editing the raven images you've uploaded? In every one you uploaded the texture looks unlike any other raven I've seen. I suspect you are running them through color or contrast enhancement, which you shouldn't do, since it dramatically changes the image from how it appears in the game. And demonstrating how the object looks in-game is what the object of the wiki is, it is not to make the images look better. 23:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm ok my mistake. Apologies, Goodman Joey. 17:55, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

How's this?
On this talk page you said the article was to big. What do you think of it now? 00:40, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

what the hell
Thanks. Your post on the RSOF makes the wiki user base look like a bunch of whining spoiled children because we are not a Platinum site. Insulting and mocking the other sites listed is quite immature. If you wish to be that way, fine. But do not for a moment do so in a manner suggesting that you speak for the wiki when you do so. It demeans all of us and lessens the wiki in the eyes of all who will read that.--Degenret01 00:41, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I understand you want us to be platinum. What you missed is Jagexs requirements for each level. And insulting the other sites on behalf of the wiki is in very poor taste. That is NOT what will get Jagex to change their minds. --Degenret01 07:01, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

About your message you left on my talk page...
I'm sorry, Joey, for not talking to you directly, but I didn't want to cause any possible problems by bringing it up in a message on your talk page, since I was afraid that you might get angry at me for being concerned. That's why I asked Degen instead of you or anyone else, since I felt that he knew more about what I was concerned about than anyone else whom I could think of who was active on the Wiki around the time I left him that particular message. Also, I was afraid to ask you directly since I wasn't sure whether it was allowed or not, and I didn't want to draw unnecessary attention to the matter by possibly getting into a debate with you over it. In any case, I wasn't aware of the Wiki's policy concerning the matter, so that's why I asked Degen instead of you. Once more, I'm sorry for going behind your back and asking Degen about it instead of you, and now that I understand that the Wiki's policy concerning the matter allows for it in your case, I deeply regret even asking the question in the first place. 13:04, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

AA artefacts
Hoi daar. Bij de nominatie van de steencirkel in Taverley bij de FIMG, zei je dat AA artefacts een slecht randje om het object heen was. Eigenlijk is dit gewoon een slordige transparency. Ik heb nog wel wat gevonden. Ik kan het mis hebben, dus zeg het even als het zo is. 09:31, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hm, mhm, agreed. Als je een afbeelding uit de Knowledge Base "steelt" en vervolgens op de witte wikia gebruikt, zijn er ook AAA. 06:31, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

RE: ser page/goals
Ohhh, thanks. I wish it would email me when i get something on my talk page.

Redirect
Why would you redirect the search button to the homepage? 07:56, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm fairly sure people will see the main page before they go to search. 10:01, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

There is a huge logo on the top left corner that they can click. 10:11, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Trans guide
Sure 10:19, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE:File:RSC Welcome.png
May I ask how you are going to use this? Because it looks kinda like a personal image. 07:32, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Feedback and questions
Hi! Sorry for the delayed reply, I've addressed your feedback below: Answers to questions:
 * Currently I don't plan to change the milestone list, mainly because they are quite arbitrary and will vary from person to person, although being able to view a custom milestone might be feasible.
 * I'm working on improving the labels on the x-axis, the graphing library I use doesn't seem to support lines like that but I'm working on making some changes to the library.
 * Fixed, I'll probably make a slightly different version of my header for QBot's page later.
 * That won't really help since the main part of the loading time is spent downloading the contributions from Wikia, which is needed for just about any part of the edit reports. I do hope to make some changes to improve loading times though.
 * This is indeed done by scanning user contributions and the user logs.
 * I'll look into that but it may take awhile because of the work needed to get the edit report data to refresh automatically instead of when you visit the webpage.
 * Unique means the number of uniquely titled articles that were edited. For example, if you edit the same page twice, it counts as one unique edit, but editing two different pages would be two unique edits. If you take the total number of edits divided by the total number of unique edits, you get the average edits per page statistic at the top of the report. "Import" log actions are done when using Special:Import to upload pages, "Patrol" log actions are related to the patrolled edit feature to indicate that a page has been reviewed by a trusted user; users with the autopatrol right (bots and sysops) automatically generate a patrol log action for each edit they make on a page. User creation actions are generated when a user makes an account via Special:Signup.
 * Bots can be run by anyone; on this wiki there is the RS:BOTS policy regulating their use. Per policy, if you want to run a bot you should seek community approval first. After you get approval and have successfully tested the bot, you can receive a bot flag on the account from a bureaucrat.

Hope this answers your questions! -- 04:07, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I'm not aware of any way to specify a certain milestone edit in a template like that, I was thinking something along the lines of an RSS feed, like this:

http://rstools.ath.cx/editreport_milestones_rss.php|date=d M Y|max=5
 * Special:Import is used to mass-transfer pages from another wiki by using Special:Export (you should be able to see this page ). It's nice if you need to create/restore a wiki backup or create a mirror website of some or all pages of a wiki. -- 05:00, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the feed isn't set up to be customizable at the moment, and it won't update itself when a new milestone is hit. That's part of the problem I mentioned earlier . For now, the only way to do it is to manually update the milestones. -- 00:10, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Project Myface
Thanks so much, I really do appreciate it! Right now I do have a few images ready to upload but as far as I know, images are broken at the moment and will not update properly. Once it is fixed I will continue to upload (and update my Myface page). Thanks again! 01:14, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, it appears to be fixed! I'll continue to upload new images and update my Myface page. 01:36, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, looks like images are down again... why is this happening!? :( 22:59, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I quit for reasons completely unrelated to you. I will continue to upload images of the same quality, but just won't be part of the project anymore. 03:14, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

RE:re:Question
Thanks for the help, but that's not what I meant. I know that, but what I wanted to know was how for it to search through all of my levels, and then decide with one is the lowest, and then use that one. The only way I can think of doing it is to make a giant if statement basically going if attack > defense > etc etc. And I'd rather not have to do something like that. 22:52, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

cant
it not nice, for e.g people may say im better then you, see how bad that is, it make people feel bad, so no sorry -- 18:40, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Western lands
I'm not neutral. Me closing the RFD would be a conflict of interest. you'd have to find an admin who was not as involved in the discussion as I was. Also please be more patient in the future. Posting "lets close this" "i'm getting tired of this" "this is taking too long" etc. is not helpful and is in fact counter-productive. 23:03, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, things take a while, especially if its contested. Its fine to ask for closure, but your requests were more like complaints about how long it was taking. Also, you can bring more attention to the issue by using Closure, which adds your request to a list of requests that are checked by admins fairly often. 23:38, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can always try poking a neutral sysop. My go-to guys are User:Aburnett, User:Calebchiam, and User:Quarenon. The big Q doesn't care about much of anything, so he's almost always a neutral sysop. 23:39, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

UTP violation
Your comments on are an unacceptable violation of RS:UTP. You cannot talk to someone like that just because they have a dissenting opinion, nor is it acceptable to speculate that they are doing so just to irritate you. He is offering his opinion just as you are offering your opinion. Do not take such a confrontational tone in the future. 21:02, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok so you were both in the wrong. I warned him too. 22:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't know either >_> 20:08, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * I suppose this was a reply to my edit summary at RuneScape:Featured images/File:Dragon ornament.png... 20:13, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:FIMG
Hi there. First of all, that was poor wording. Supporting them would be better wording. Now, you can't deny it, you just support your images just because they are your images, because you want credits. Also, why the hell would I just support/oppose something just to do the exact opposite of what you did? You need to stop taking everything personal. Also, I can't remember where you said it, but I do't just go oppose deletions just because they are rfd's. I oppose them when I think the article isn't going to cause any harm. Now, you said that I opposed most of the fimg's. Then I'd suggest you should go re-check and count them, and you'd see that it's not true, there are even ones that I was the only supporter. (and well, I think there were ones that I was the only opposer too.) For the last part; I wasn't trying to fight you. I was just pointing out what I think, and since I didn't insult you or anything, that clearly does not violate RS:UTP. 13:26, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE: RS:UCS and RS:NIP
Sorry, but you obviously don't get RS:UCS, or just arguing for the sake of arguing. It's pretty obvious that suggesting something like asdasdasd is the same thing with Granite boots is not common sense. Now, I don't know what makes you think I care a lot of time, but I must say that information never is a loss of time. Also, I'm not the only one opposing in that thread, and that shouldn't be relevant to giving up, since even if I'm the only one, we don't count votes, but look at the arguments. 13:29, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * We can't decide what's useful or not. Someone else might always find useful that something you didn't. I'd say Granite boots are more useful then Red cog for example. Speculation is irrelevant here, since I'm not saying we should add any. Also, I don't know what makes you think I'm fighting, since this is just casual arguing. 14:00, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Hidden Category
Hi. I noticed you tried to make Category:Userbox templates hidden. There's no real reason to do this, so I removed it. Hidden categories only need to be created if having the name of the category appear on the page is undesirable, though I can't see any problem with a link to the category page appearing on the template pages. Feel free to leave me a message if you still disagree with this. 21:25, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

Image granularity
I'm just dropping by to make sure you know that RS:G covers IMAGES too. For instance, ashes and ground bat bones  look identical, but they must have separate images. Likewise, eek and spiders may look the same, but they too must have separate images. And no, you can't simply upload an image you took of eek to both locations, you must take a picture of eek and a picture of a spider. This of course translates to all other identical images. 03:03, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: File:Level 99 Fireworks.ogg
I used Audacity. While I can no longer record from my sound card, it helps to have the latest driver and if possible, best sound card you can purchase. Seeing as I only can play on my laptop, I cannot do OGG/MP3's now. 19:11, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Siggy
Hello, dear sir. This is a quick message concerning your signature; it's got too many images in it. Unfortunately, a maximum of two is aloud. Thank you, dear sir. Goodbye, dear sir. 17:50, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why thank you, dear sir, I'd be delighted, dear sir, to receive a nice cuppa tea, dear sir. Thank you, dear sir. Once again goodbye, dear sir. 12:45, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. cookie pl0x, dear sir.
 * In that case, dear sir, my level in sloth is too high to drag my arse to that house of you because I am far away in the lands of the Ogres. And no, dear sir, I did not recognise my name in your signature because I was too busy doing this. Goodbye, dear sir. 14:27, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * But chinchompas cannot make mudcookies! Larupia's can, so that evens out. Mrrow. 17:36, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. One more thing. I understand Mr Zurkon quit PMF because... OK, I don't understand. But I'm mostly curious about what happened to LDP. I don't get anything of it! Dear sir. I may have accidentally killed a carnivorous chinchompa using its kin. Accidentally. On purpose... Oh, dang. 18:34, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well... it said "Squeak"... <-) 12:59, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: RS:CUTEMUP
It's not useless, it's a redirect. -- 00:07, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Leaving
Dunno, I just didn't want to carry on. 18:57, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Giant images
When you upload a giant image, that is significantly larger than the previous version, as you did for File:Third age melee.PNG, please go through and make sure that the significantly increased size doesn't mess up the formatting of pages. This is especially true for images that are in infoboxes. You can resize an image that is inside an infobox by typing |100px after the file name within the infobox coding. Thanks, 02:49, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

AWB Request
I think you want this page. 11:30, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Policies.
You're probably sick of me telling you misunderstood policies, but that's simply clear, and you can go ask someone else if you want. First of all, "your common sense" is not different from anyone else's. That's why it's common sense. Then, you also don't understand RS:AEAE since you actually used it to get a redirect deleted. That policy is exists to make sure that anyone's opinion weighs same in discussions, and isn't even close to what you think. Now, there was one more policy in my mind, but I forgot what it was :o (yeah, I'm a noob.). Anyways, please do not refer to policies/respond to them without knowing what they are about. Thank you. 13:22, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Project Myface
I would like to join the Myface Project. 18:42, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. 5:49, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Collapsible Table
Thanks for the help. I knew if I added a header it would work, but as I speak I'm thinking of ways to make the header discrete. Perhaps even colouring it white if you don't want one at all would work. 19:25, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Pretty awesome, thank-you. 19:43, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

I made chu a userbox :3
I made chu a userbox :D! Just so you know, I don't mean it in a bad way. 00:02, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, you really should use this box for that comment xD 00:07, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Image granularity
Per RS:G, When items and NPCs which look identical in-game have separate articles, they should link to separate images. Keeping separate images for separate items (or NPCs), even when they look identical, is less confusing, promotes organization, and reduces the work required if the images diverge. That's why I didn't merge Freaky Forester and Pretzel Bert images. 21:07, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you'd like, you could upload the same image to File:Freaky forester.png.  21:16, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * ^ Actually no you can't. You can only upload images taken of freaky forster to that file, since uploading an image of pretzel bert as an iamge of freaky forester is a lie. 21:27, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uploading an image of one subject and saying it is a different subject is dishonest and not very encyclopedic. It is more important to have a true image than a super good image. Besides the image we already have of the forester is fine. Its not sd, the angle isn't terrible, etc. There's no need to bend the rules to replace a good image of subject a with a slightly better looking image of subject b, just because they look similar. 21:44, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

I did indeed use AWB for that. However, I was averaging under 5 edits per minute. While this was partly to fix the name of the town, it was also an experiment to see how much 5 edits per minute would flood the recent changes, and to hopefully lower the allowed number in the future. As you know, we can use our main accounts when editing at under 5 per minute. 22:08, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice templating, yay. I'll talk to Liquid about lowering it.   22:15, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. Anyway, I'll see what I can do with &bot=1. Thanks,  18:29, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

helpful contributors
Do not call their edits spam, and do not tell them no more than 5 edits per minute. That was some BS you left on his page and I better not see it again.-- 16:08, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * For the record, no such policy exists to limit edits to 5 or under per minute.-- 00:44, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Reuploading
"Wikia servers are not working entirely properly at this time. Do not reupload images that appear to be failing to upload properly." I'm sure you read that in the upload page. OF, COURSE YOU DID. Everyone reads that. 22:23, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * You are forgiven, son. 22:38, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Links to Psycho in signatures
Since I'm a big talk page stalker, and since I happen to know why, I'll field that question for you. See Forum:Psycho Robot Gone too far! It was basically a desysop Psycho thread started by Parsons. Now, we're all mocking him by taking phrases from the proposal and putting them in our signature. Psycho started it. The rest of the crowd just followed. You should take a phrase from there also. 16:48, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17:02, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, you have your categories separate from the rest of the page. Normally, categories are lumped together at the end of the page, and wikia decided to give them their own section. You can put them all in the editing box by going to Special:Preferences. Under the edit tab, the last line says something like "Disable category select". If you check it, then everything is shown. Look at October 1 again after you disable category select, and you'll see what I'm talking about.  18:00, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I must also ask you to provide an emergency shutdown link on your bot page. See here for sample code. 18:05, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Platypus
Thanks so much =D though he's not a criminal XD 10:56, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lies. 11:16, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Discussion. 16:32, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

U won!
S stand by my word, u done the corporeal beast, u get 50k next time i see you, now we out of images for a while, so well done =) -- 19:12, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rollbacks
You now have the rollback tool, please be sure to only use it in cases of obvious vandalism as it does not provide an adequate summary for good faith edits, happy editing.-- 23:29, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

RE:spam
You did well, young Jal-Yt (though it does ask that it be w/ a lolcat, but this will do) 20:31, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Rudeness to new people, part 2
When I see some one being rude to a new person I am damn well gonna let them know not to do it. YOU have been around for a while and should know better. If you and Mr. Helm wish to start a desysop thread I will not have any problems with that what so ever. I have never claimed to be better than you so your comment about me not being better is totally pointless. I treat all editors with the respect they deserve. New editors ar our future, and if you some at them the way you did that future will not happen. And do not try to blame Cook, HIS message to you was clear and direct and appropriate. Your message to Evil said NOTHING about awb.-- 21:14, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Informing you not to treat new people in a certain way is not rude. Nothing I have said to you is rude. If you cannot handle being critiqued for your actions, then do not leave people messages as you did.-- 22:04, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Joey, can you take it down a notch please? Arguing like this isn't going to do you much good. Thanks, 22:12, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, see, Degen isn't talking in ALL CAPS, nor is he using too harsh language. And please don't start a desysop Degen thread. It's going to cause unnecessary wiki drama, and would almost certainly fail. I would strong oppose it if you did.


 * Man, you have a serious problem. You have called me rude three times when I have not been rude to you once. Everything I have said to you is on point. If you think I have been wrong, go start that thread to desysop me as you threatened. But stop telling me to not be rude when I have not done so.-- 22:19, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Urm, sorry to but in like this, but couldn't you guys just... forget about it...? There is far too much fighting in the wiki D: 17:13, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RS:DEU
Hi, I'm not Psycho but... 15:21, 2010 September 25 Judytje (Talk | contribs) uploaded "File:Judytje photo booth.gif" Judytje uploaded the full shot of him but the file was deleted (per RS:NOT), so I'm guessing Psycho thought that is is what he wanted. 18:16, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

RS:DEU
I remember that edit and I made it in response to seeing judy struggle with putting a forum image up. But looking though his contribs I don't see the struggling, so it could be that I saw someone else struggling with it and got confused/clicked the wrong user page. Oops. 19:56, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Slayer substitutes
Joe, When you requested merging Slayer substitutes to Slayer assignments, did you consider actually merging the information? I know that it ended up with a decision for "speedy redirect", but it seems like good form if the information actually got captured, anyway. I know that, as you said, in many cases it was the same information in two locations - but I'm sure that you noticed that Slayer substitutes was set up to give more detail about which specific creatures (which levels, etc.) were substitutes than Slayer assignments is. (Take a look at the entry for vampires, for example. Almost certainly overkill now that it has been filled in - but it seemed useful when some of them were in the "Unknown" column.) That sort of level of detail belongs, at best, in the trivia section of Slayer assignments (as if you would want to put a trivia section in an "article" that is just a table) but is useful detail for some specific cases. And, probably more importantly, the column on "these are not valid substitutes" is information missing entirely from Slayer assignments. Perhaps you are already planning to add this, when you have the time - but on my monitor, at least, this is already a crowded table, and I don't think that adding another column to it was a wise decision. Be that as it may, the decision has been made - so is this information being tossed. or will it be added to Slayer assignment? I'm assuming that you already considered this, since your RfM stated "that page holds all information already, and is more complete". (Slayer substitutes also has an "Unknown" column that was used to track work in process - could have been done another way, but it seemed to work well. I'm sure that this could be added to Slayer assignments, too - but, again, at best it seems not to belong in the main table.) JalYt-Mej-Wynde 21:24, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

File:Volcano.xcf
XCF, just so you know what it is. 22:14, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: I s'pose
Tytytytytytyty! 15:37, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okokokokokokok! 16:16, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey. I want to say that your image work in the GWD is AWESOME! They just rock! And y'know what? I'm gonna help you! Right now! Oh, and you might want to add Cyclops and Vampire images to your PMF page.  16:39, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I can't. Sorry. 17:07, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Het zit dus zo: na precies drie seconden orbgebruik in full screen in de GWD staat het scherm stil. De cursor kan wel worden bewogen, maar noch de muis noch het toetsenbord reageert. Het enige wat ik kan is de computer uitzetten d.m.v. de aanzetknop. Dus ik zal het nog eens proberen, maar reken er niet op. :P 14:05, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * That does look quite awesome, doesn't it? 17:54, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Re:AA templates
And then Chess changed it... 03:18, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * The thing here is that you are experienced with AA images, therefore you are fast with it. Normal users are not. Anyone can do non-AA transparency, but not everyone can do AA transparency. However, I'm not going to re-undo your edit, since it'll lead to an edit war. 18:24, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, btw, I didn't revert your edit, I undid it, which is completely different. Also, your comment of me editing without knowing nothing about is baseless, making it pointless. 18:31, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * The quality difference is very little, and non-aa trans is always faster since you don't have to manually outline the image. 19:15, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Saying aa is much better is pure opinion, and not a fact. Also, wand is really fast if you know how to use it. Now, I'm not saying outline is too slow, but I'm saying it can't be faster. I'd guess they are both about the same speed, and wand is easier if you ask me. Anyways, it's obvious that non-aa trans is faster than aa, even if you use the same method. 19:40, October 1, 2010 (UTC)