User talk:Liquidhelium

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole.

Come back@@
Hello Mr. Helm, come back to the IRC@@@ - I'm here now :P 03:11, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * o ya wai u replace teh hilite on ur naem??? 15:17, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

no ur nub
People kept adding to it, like a guestbook, which it wasn't meant to be. And the only way to stop was to delete it. ur stil as nub toe, dont wury. 13:16, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * alos i failt ur quiz, it wuz hardr tan stlrers 13:28, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * no urs was atlest 89x as hurd as steler.s 19:02, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Stickies
I am seriously tempted to change it anyway. It's much easier to remove the sticky later if I do, and I have absolutely no idea why you are so resistant to the change. 13:28, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was just trying to acknowledge that he was a good anti-vandal, and I started wording it in such a way that it would be a comparison, though I could not come up with another example. I later had to change my support because that alone is not a good enough reason. 12:37, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

70.121.39.74
Why did you block 70.121.39.74? I mean, it wasn't that offensive and it was only the first time he vandalised. Why wasn't a warning enough? 15:34, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, right. Personally I'd only block if they do something like that twice. 16:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

kick
You don't think ranks have to explain why they kicked someone when its not clear? Sorry for posting here you can respond on the forum but it seems like its really dead over there >.< or u can respond on my talk up 2 u. 17:40, August 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * He should only apologies if he can find no reason what so ever that he kicked me, which I see as unlikely. If he has any reason at all he can feel free to tell me on my talk and we can discuss it there. I tried asking him why he felt the need to kick, and got the respond "I (dtm) don't need to say anything to internet trolls". 17:50, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Even if there is a reason to kick, ranks shouldn't be able to go around kicking anyone they want and then ignore all questions about why they did it... you can't possibly think thats right, can you? 18:05, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Very well. What do you think I should do though? Its not like the thread doesn't have enough posts not to be closed, I wouldn't say theres a lack of consensus, and everyone seems to have lost interest. I don't see what to do besides close it or abandon the issue, which sends the wrong message. 18:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * But that sends the signal that ranks can kick for literally no reason and then ignore anyone who complains, dismissing them as "internet trolls". 18:18, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

ur nawt band
just so u know. 20:07, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * k. it is possible, just not effciently and it's much ewasier to get around. 20:09, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

hao do u like mai new epic sig? based on mai userpage. 20:26, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RuneScape:Requests for deletion/RuneScape:Chat/QDB
Yeah, I'm fine with the new proposal. It's not really a discussion anyway; it's more like a really lame version of QDB/Bash. 02:52, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

wat
go away. its not december yet. gtfo mai wiki. 18:18, August 18, 2010 (UTC)