User talk:Saftzie

__NOINDEX__

Citadel upgrade information
The Tier 5 keep upgrade only requires 25 visitors. My clan's citadel ticked last night and we only had 29 visitors. Based on the data in this wiki I believed we needed 35 visitors. Because our collected resources applied to the keep upgrade, I now believe the 25 visitor limit indicated on the main runescape wiki: http://services.runescape.com/m=rswiki/en/Clan_Citadel_-_Building%2C_Upgrading_and_Downgrading. I've edited this citadel page twice but someone like you has put it back to the old incorrect values. Guess you don't value my contribution.


 * You can see what the numbers are if you open the citadel interface and look at the number of visitors. For upkeep, the number changes from red to yellow. For Tier 5, that happens at 20. For upgrade, the number changes from yellow to green. That happens at 35. -- 14:12, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

This is the number i refer to, the total visitors in the upper right corner of the citadel dialog. We are at tier 4 now upgrading to tier 5 on this build tick. The number is green now at 26 and was yellow when the count was 23 which was my last check. Mithyr Sar 22:08, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * In which case the Tier 4 upgrade number should be 25, instead of 20. Which is a bit odd, considering the Tier 5 upkeep number is 20. But the Tier 5 numbers are correct as 20 and 35. -- 22:13, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * The text of the manual does not implicitly state how the table should be read. I have read it as 'the upgrade _to_ "tier 4" requires "20" members, upgrade to "tier 5" requires "25"' instead of 'from' which seems how your reading follows. The upkeep column requires no change of state so the semantics are different. Mithyr Sar 22:25, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's true that the context of the column in this wiki may not be clear. We can change that. In either case, in the Jagex game guide, there is definitely a problem with the numbers reported there. -- 22:42, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Date format
While the format "16/01/12" is not a valid one for this wiki, the dd/mm/yy method is the normal date format for most countries in the world. 20:24, January 27, 2012 (UTC)

Arcane stream necklace request: Thanks
Thanks for fulfilling my bot's administrator request, even if it turned out to be a glitch.

It should only post on Project:Administrator requests if it encounters a protected page, but it appears that either of the following occurred:
 * the database on Wikia lagged 100+ seconds and its edit throttle was 10 seconds;
 * it didn't catch Template:Userbox/Drewards because it was a template that transcluded Template:Userbox and had an image in it, and the use of the image would be counted towards Template:Userbox instead;
 * it didn't catch Template:Userbox/Drewards because it was a template that transcluded Template:Userbox and had an image in it, and the use of the image would be counted towards the page transcluding Template:Userbox/Drewards instead.

This was a bug I already encountered but didn't pinpoint. I'm making only single-image moves with the bot at the moment to look for bugs, looking very carefully at the result of each. 07:17, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Penguin numbering
Regarding your revert to Distractions and Diversions Locations/Penguin Hide and Seek (that's a long name): But there's no need to count them, the order doesn't matter at all and there's no real set order anyway. The numbers are whatever order the editor decided they would be in. Removing them gives more room for the table's other cells, which are cramped as they are. Do the numbers actually add anything (besides the "oh, there's only eight penguins listed, someone screwed up!" reasssurement?) 01:43, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * If people trust me and no one else edits, then there's no problem. But we've actually been there on this page. People add some or delete some. Numbering makes it obvious. Also, as for order, 1-points first, 2-points last, non-quest before quest, Wild as last non-quest, otherwise taken in same order as Team Peng. -- 01:46, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Image move bot

 * This is a follow-up to User talk:A proofreader and User talk:Joeytje50, and is cross-posted to User talk:Hofmic. Replies should go to User talk:A proofreader.

Yeah, I said to go ahead with a huge request of 3000 images, but what I didn't expect is so many red links appearing all over the wiki between the moves and the edits to fix the red links. Cook Me Plox alerted me to that.

Saftzie edited a page, fixing the red links, because s/he thought the bot would not follow up. The thing is that it would follow up, though; it will just not edit that page now because it's already fixed.


 * Second the implementation change to move ONE file, update all the filelinks, move ONE file, update all the filelinks, etc. If a redlink exists for 10 seconds, it's livable. If redlink exists for minutes, it's not. If redlink exists for hours, it's too ridiculous for comment. -- 20:16, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * [ Carried over from RuneScape:Administrator requests ] As for the talk page replies, you replied on your own talk page, which is something I did not expect. Apologies for that, but now the haphazard discussion on User talk:A proofreader, User talk:Joeytje50/A14, User talk:Hofmic and your talk page can go on Forum:RSW image renamer: Tweaks. I see you've made your point there, and I will honour any consensus formed there. 23:38, March 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * I posted on YOUR talk page. I would never expect you to read MY talk page for my reply. However, I did COPY my post to my talk page. My post is in the section "re:I r a nubsaus :3 ". -- 00:55, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right. My mistake.  00:58, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

Regarding a revert
I see that you reverted an edit on 'Distractions and Diversions Locations/Penguin Hide and Seek'. There are more than just W60 and W71 that do penguins so it would be very unfair to the other worlds/groups that aren't mentioned. I originally edited the information to avoid any conflict between groups and to make it easier for wikia users to understand where to go for more help. There had already been a discussion about this on the official RS Wiki and now it states to go to a specific section of the forums rather than mentioning worlds as it just causes a flame war. Do you think that you could re-consider your revert? Thank you. --86.30.146.108 09:55, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * That line on Distractions and Diversions Locations/Penguin Hide and Seek is a standard line on this wiki for many activities with fairly standard wording. If there are more worlds, then list them. -- 11:12, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Gielinor game prep
I'll take the pic after daily reset. And why would it have a maximum of 57 points for cooking when the other two activities give 60 each? 07:02, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems odd to me, as well, but 19 pts is all I got. The chance of getting the one dish that has a score of 27 may make confirming the pt value a challenge, though. -- 07:08, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've been getting 20 points off of dishes with a score of 26 and 19 off of dishes with 25, I have yet to get a 27, idk if there's a glitch where 27 gives less than 26 or if there's other restrictions involved. 07:12, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, and is probably what they intend. I'll edit the page that way, then, and see if anyone else disagrees. -- 08:29, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. 08:31, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

Games ring redirects
And they're still useful redirects. "Oh, that silver ring from the games, I'll look for silver games ring". 22:54, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Saftzie, could you make it a bit clearer for me (sorry if I didn't understand it) 23:00, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Please leave it next time
http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Distractions_and_Diversions_Locations/Penguin_Hide_and_Seek?diff=next&oldid=6293308 Leaving the code helps the 90% of people who will use the Fairy Ring, there is no reason not to include it on that page.--Degenret01 (talk) 03:54, September 26, 2012 (UTC)