User talk:Zezzima

25k trick
It is encouraging other users to break rules by providing an unfair advantage on pvp worlds to manipulate the system. It has been deleted before under different names for the same section. 01:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Your Story
Your story touched me rofl. You know, you can go to the west entrance, they won't kill you. All ofit made me laugh in my head!

Re: ban some dumb noobs?
Hello, I've blocked 206.213.191.133 for a week, longer blocks will be issued if there is more vandalism after the current block expires. 03:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Grand exchange
I bet you just removed that so people would support your AOTM nomination.

Then how come you removed it now? You should of removed waay before if there was no updates. --Supirion1 23:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Forum admin
You do realise he'll remain an administrator as well as a forum admin? O.O

No, forum admins can block people from the forums and admins can't.

Yes, really. --Supirion1 23:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Just thought I should add that admins (i.e. sysops) can moderate the forums - block and warn users, and lock and delete posts. Forum admins can do all this and make stickies, global anouncements and polls, but of course can't do any of the other things a sysop can do, unless they are already an admin (like Dtm already is a sysop, 'crat and a forum admin). Thanks, 15:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * A bureaucrat is a user who has all the abilities of a sysop, and can assign user rights - i.e. make users rollbacks, sysops and bureaucrats, and can remove those rights (except bureaucrat, only wikia staff can remove that). Also bureaucrats are the only users who can close RfAs, RfBs and RfFs (though thats not really a technical thing, its only because they can act on it). We don't have many bureaucrats as we don't need them - 3 are active (Azaz, Dtm and Dr5ag2on1 (Vimescarrot is semi-active, more often in the CC ingame than on the wiki)) out of 8 total for the RS wiki (Wikipedia has 31 bureaucrats total). The wiki's founder was Merovingian, though he's not active anymore. Hope that helps 16:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Good faith ?
Regarding 94.196.221.8, should you not first assume good faith and use for a first cause of possible vandalism, instead of leaving an aggressive message on his talkpage ? For all we know, with a little bit of constructive critism he could make an account and become a great editor. 16:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It basically tells them nicely to follow the instructions at the top of the page, if they continue vandalising you can either report them to the Counter vandalism team to deal with or add or  to their page, which tells them  the following ;

It was me, i just put it there to show an example of what does, you didnt acctually vandalise :P  16:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stop Changing
I know that sabotages is the plural form, but the problem is that sabotage doesn't refer to a person committing it, while saboteur does. I discussed it on Soul Wars' discussion page already, and I thought it was cleared up, as it was concluded that saboteurs was the correct term. So if you don't mind, can I change it back? :P

08:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Please don't corrupt pages
Sorry about that. I use a spell check thing that underlines words that it does not recognise. I just search for an American spelt word and change it on all the pages. Still, on the flip side, I have spell checked hundreds of pages and changed possibly over a thousand words and I have only ever made 1 mistake. That is a good success percentage

Notice about your editing
I would like to say that you probably do not know about NPOV (Neutral point of view). You shouldn't say special attacks ARE needed, but rather "special attacks are recommended" like that. Plus, shark4tour3's edit isn't in bad faith....You probably did not assume good faith. o.O 01:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Please remember to abide by all of our policies. In the case of ignore all rules, remember that any rule you ignore must be for the good of the wiki, and that the community should agree with your choice before you IAR. Thanks in advance, 10:02, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rollback Request
You now have the ability to use [ rollback ]. Be careful when using it and make sure you only use it on obvious vandalism. Any edits made in good faith, including those that may go against the style guide, etc. deserve a reason why they are being undone. 03:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Signature
Go to "more" in the top right corner and click on preferences. Then type in (or whatever your signature code is. --1473rpwn3d1337 07:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, go to your preferences Type Signatures/Zezzima in the Signature box and check the Custom signature box, save and you can then sign with the four tildes.

08:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Animation in signature
Hello. It appears that your signature contains an animated image. Recently there has been a discussion which resulted in a new rule;  Signatures must not have animations in them. Please replace the animation in your signature to fit in with the current rules. Feel free to ask any question on my talk page. Thanks in advance. 10:34, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * \ The discussion can be found in the Yew Grove. 15:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

You need proof that the signature limit passed? 16:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1: Supports: 15
 * 2: Opposes: 1

Serious Concerns
Hello Zezzima, there are some concerns related to your connections with the accounts Try Combat and Noob4lyfe. Both of these accounts have either made their first or second edit to Lumbridge's Article of the Month nomination. I've performed a check user on your account and the Try Combat and Noob4lyfe accounts. The result of this check has shown that each of these accounts (including yours) are in the Sunnyvale, California area. Basically indicating sockpuppeting and gaming the system toward Lumbridge's nomination. Now, is there something you would like to tell me? (I'm all ears...)-- 17:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

I have a strange suspicion that you are sockpuppeting..... 04:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Riiiiiiiight.... Sure... 05:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * What you've done is called meat puppetry. This is considered a slightly indirect way of vote manipulation. I'll therefore be eliminating those votes, and warn your friends that they are not to vote in any further processes that you vote in.-- 23:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Please remain calm. He isn't saying you are lying about your friends voting for you. He is emphasizing that your friends are unable to vote what you vote now. 04:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

If they stick around and contribute a bit for a while they will be acceptable as voting people. That means real contribs BTW, not adding and removing a period or a word fifty times as another user tried a few months ago to get a high edit count.--Degenret01 04:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * He also posted here about the article of the month... And btw it was crossed off because he doesn't have 50 mainspace edits.. 23:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Noob
Ahhh, I see, you semm to take pleasure in calling me a noob. 05:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This looks on the brink of flaming, so, now, before it escalates to that: stop.
 * Zezzima: please remember that all editors are equal, so it doesn't matter that Supirion isn't an admin; you should still at least respect him. Rather than calling him a noob, you should discuss with him why he did this and try to understand his reasoning.
 * If you haven't already, make sure you know all of our policies well. 23:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi um...Remember that rollback is for obvious vandalism. This is doesn't look like vandalism. Also, after you add the novandal/gemw/test templates, remember to sign. 04:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It could be vandalism, but we assume good faith. It still sounded like terrorbird anyways. He could have just removed the letters like he was testing his edit or maybe, like I said, he thought thats how the terrorbird is pronounced. The undo button works just as fine if you are unsure.=) 05:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol. I'm not a sysop. >.< Ask huanghe. I think he is still online. 05:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Uhhh...No....What made you say that anyways? 05:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

vandals
Hey,you do well at reporting vandals. I do have a small sugggestion for you. If it is the first offense, and you warned them on their talk page, you do not need to report it to the CVU. Most vandals will not repeat (yes, most, not all, I know) especially after being warned. Also, if someone else has warned them already, you do not need to do so again. Whther it be the nice template or just a sentemce or two, one warning is enough. Thanks man, good stuff you do. --Degenret01 21:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You think they dont read edit summaries? Well, for the most part I bet they do not. But I am sure some of them see the summaries some of the time. And when you bait them, you asking them to com back and do more. [Here], this is a great little article.--Degenret01 02:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:My page is vandalized
I am a ninja, I strike when you least expect it! Muahaha! ;) 02:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding AotM
Your behaviour on the AotM nominations is quite unnacceptable (especially here and here). Please remember that judging AotM has nothing to do with the nominator nor with what the actual thing is like in-game.

Also, your comments towards Hess36 is very impolite, bordering on offensive. Please do not become offensive towards other users, per the User treatment policy.

I feel that you should refrain from voting on or nominating an article for AotM, at least until August (i.e. September's nominations), as you get very defensive (almost abusive) of your nomination when there really is no need for it, and also due to your recent meat puppetry. A month to 'cool off', as it were. 20:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

User page edits.by an IP
Zezz, you have to take time and actually look at the edit man. This is something that is critical to Assuming Good Faith. We have lots of user page edits done on a daily basis by a user that forgot to log on. If it is not evident vandalism, do not revert it. Tell the IP to sign on if they are that actual user. If you had looked at the actual edit, and the history of IP 66.59.103.158 you would see they have edited that page correctly before, and never vandalized. Don't be trigger happy. Thanks.--Degenret01 00:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If it is not obvious vandalism, leave it. It doesn't hurt anything. And you do not owe me an apology, you didn't do anything to me.--Degenret01 04:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I am amazed.
I edited my own page w/o logging in. This isn't a crime.

Block IP?
I did for 1 month. 05:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Nowiki
The  tag is used to remove red links while still keeping whatever text was there. He is clearing the wanted pages of red links. 15:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
Sorry, but who reports it doesn't really matter. That doesn't make any difference. As long as the vandal gets reported asap it doesn't matter who reported them.-- 07:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

AOTM
I get the feeling that you don't see the point of Article of the month. It is for showcasing a high quality article every month

The AOTM should have nothing to do with what it is written about, with instead the votes based purely on how well the article is written. Take Hazelmere, Stone circle or History of Varrock from this year as an example. They all have very little significance in-game yet they were Article of the month purely because of how well they are written. 01:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, Lucien is a well written article and worthy of being AOTM. I just think that Battle of the Archipelago is more worthy. I am not trying to convert you to vote for Battle, I just thought it was a bit balmy to oppose an article because you have not heard of it before or because it is not about a location or NPC. 01:13, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism by 68.188.233.90
Hi, just to let you know that User:68.188.233.90 deleted a section on your userpage. I reverted it and reported the edit to the CVU. -- 03:17, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Subst:-ing
Hi. When placing vandalism notices on pages, you should use the  function to place the content of the template on the page permanently. For example: rather than  you should place. This also applies to placing welcome notices. Thanks, 17:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Subst-ing puts the full code on the page, not just the template. If you use subst in a welcome notice, it will feel more personal to the user welcomed. (Not in a bad way). 00:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a subst code:  Vandalism 

Hello,, it appears that you have been vandalizing the RuneScape Wiki. Vandalism includes:


 * Adding offensive comments to pages.
 * Removing or blanking content from pages or templates.
 * Adding nonsense to articles or creating nonsense pages.
 * Purposefully adding incorrect information to articles.
 * Attacking another user.
 * Advertising.
 * Breaking or encouraging others to break Jagex's game rules.

If you have been or are doing this, please stop and try to make useful contributions or you will be blocked. If you have already been blocked and you feel that the block was unfair, please contact a sysop by leaving a message on your talk page. A sysop will read your appeal and make a decision.

If you were blocked, you are more than welcome to return after your block expires and make helpful contributions. Thank you.. Go to history and see what I typed. 01:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Feel the Love

 * CS
 * CS55555
 * CS5692-36900
 * **** CS
 * SHSH22
 * SHSHSH
 * CS ******
 * CS MORE****
 * Anti-Vandal ****
 * RFHSDJSDJSDHS
 * GAshas234
 * FGHSDFHSDHSDH
 * CS3666
 * CS366
 * CS6666
 * CS5000
 * CS40291
 * CS5029
 * Anti-Vandal Bot
 * CS2
 * CS4
 * CS3
 * GASH312
 * USH423
 * CS686
 * BaiSoft123
 * SoftBai123
 * CS12
 * CS6
 * LUckytoilet
 * Luckytoilêt
 * C2
 * Jason Gin
 * Jason Ginn
 * Iuckytoilet
 * Sdfsdfsdf
 * Bai Li
 * ToiletLucky
 * WillSmith
 * LuckyToilet
 * I guess you could say he was a bit of a fan of the Wiki, considering how many times he came back.-- 03:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * We're sure it's him thanks to the similiar behavior and check user (in fact he's the reason a few admins have the tool now). Most of his IPs were benned and he eventually was frustrated into submission.-- 04:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)