RuneScape:Requests for undeletion/File:Robbery1.png to File:Robbery 5.png, File:DZ1.png to File:DZ6.png and File:Love Story dungeon.png

File:Robbery1.png to File:Robbery 5.png, File:DZ1.png to File:DZ6.png and File:Love Story dungeon.png
Lots of files, eh? Eleven, to be precise (counting File:WTRobbery2.png with the robbery files). They were all deleted in one go, with the reason being "unnecessary image". Here comes my proof they aren't. First of all, File:Love Story dungeon.png. It shows a player (*cough* me *cough*) and Dionysius fighting a pit rock protector in Zenevivia's dungeon pit. This image gives more insight in what you're doing there and, as the deleter said, illustrates the text. Plus, that section of the quest guide was quite devoid of images. Next, the DZ-series. These are some images of the Z&D's love and break-up cutscene. But not only that, as with it, our only images of Zambo as a child, Yambo, My Name Rocks, and Pee Ker XXL were deleted. Next, its shows very interesting scenarios, such as the two fighting the Kalphite Queen. Unlike the deleter said, they were not messing the page up, but put in a neat gallery at the bottom. Also, people who cannot to Love Story might want to see those cutscenes, and they must be able to do that on the wiki, unless we WANT to lose visitors to YouTube or something. By the way, why were these images deleted but something like this not, although it also tells about the life of Dionysius? Finally, the images of the Wizards' Tower Robbery. Why were they deleted? Why weren't the images of the Draynor Bank Robbery? Odd, isn't it? They were also in a nice gallery at the bottom of the article. All the images of the DBR are also put in a gallery here, and the participating NPCs in the article itself. So, how are these images unnecessary or inconsistent? I really do not see how you can oppose.

Strong support - As nominator. P.S. If you think I simply do this for credit: one, I never do that. Two, clicking at the right moment and cropping takes 10 seconds, nothing you want credit for. There even was no ooo involved. Not that I think that anyone thinks I'm doing this for credit, but just in case... 07:10, May 14, 2011 (UTC)