User talk:The Fizzbuzzler

              645

If someone posts here saying first, I will have no choice but to post the entire text of the U.S. Constitution five times on their talk page. 06:00, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

first
and dnt u tel me tat im teh secnd@@@ 23:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Cool
Spam. 23:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll be 2nd this time. :( But I'll say FIRST! anyway. 23:48, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Functions
For Parser functions:
 * mw:Help:Extension:ParserFunctions

For String functions:
 * mw:Extension:StringFunctions

00:31, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Charm data
(I won't write Re: Charm data since technically I was the first to poke you on the subject, so it shouldn't count as replying.) I'll be happy with 25. I think that's large enough so that it's likely to weed out some of the statistically unsound edits. As for the DBP, thanks. I'll put you down as the moderator. And about 3AF, I must say that I'm very impressed. He's done quite a lot to change my initial opinion of him set when he proposed all those cache threads. There, he was extremely unprofessional and had an aura of laziness about him. Now, though I don't agree with what he's saying, I can't help but admire his excellent command of language and professionalism. He's one of only two users to significantly alter my first impression. Ajr was the other one. He started by reverting one of my edits for harassment. Then, the Ajrbot debate happened. However, after that he changed my opinion quite a bit. We have a pretty cordial nonprofessional relationship, so I'd consider him a friend. The nonprofessional part is pretty important, since we have many disagreements in our professional (aka wiki) relationship. The fact that the only communication I generally have with Degen involves some type of argument doesn't help, so I'm glad that it's only him with whom I share a mutual enmity. (For a recent scuffle, see User talk:Stelercus.)

Well, I seem to have been rambling on for a bit. I hope you'll excuse me for it. 01:21, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I doubt the drama llama will show up anytime soon. Both of us know when the situation is getting out of hand and we will pull the plug on any argument we have if we feel it's necessary. Then again, even if the drama llama shows up, the loser won't really be a complete loser, as I'm sure whoever loses is going to go down fighting and cause quite a lot of havoc. (Of course, I'm hoping it's Degen, but I would say that I certainly would want to go down fighting if I lost a major argument to Degen.) 01:38, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/3412/dramallamathumb350x3751.jpg -- 12:38, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Categorising
I just went through every monster page's infobox and copied down their names in text documents separated by different weaknesses, then I uploaded it to AWB and started clicking. It took a while but job done. 02:13, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  02:16, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Yay!
We won the yew grove! 18:58, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Read the longer statements I made on Psycho's talk, please. I don't want to get into another debate about this. 19:34, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, it was an accident? I only saw your original revert, so I upped the protection on my userpage, citing the reasoning I put on Psycho's page. I suppose I'll let it stay that way, since it's only an hour. 19:40, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Anyways, you're forgiven. I just hope that people listen to my comments. >.<  19:42, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RS:MAINTENANCE
I would prefer the page to retain the board layout, if you could manage to remove the link placeholder and the subpages. Otherwise, do what you want to it. 06:16, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the board is a very good thing, given that it allows you to see what threads you have and have not replied to. We could ask Q about possibly using a script to hide Placeholder and show only the sub page title. 06:20, September 20, 2010 (UTC)