RuneScape:Requests for adminship

'''Please do not nominate yourself or any other editors for adminship until we finish all of the current nominations. We are switching over to a new format for the RFAs and would like to make an easy transition. Please read the talk page to learn about the new format.'''

Requests for adminship (RfA) is the process by which the users of the RuneScape Wiki decide who will become administrators (also known as admins or sysops), who are users with access to additional technical features that aid in maintenance. A user either submits his or her own request for adminship (a self-nomination) or is nominated by another user.

About RfA
The community grants administrator status to trusted users, so nominees should have been on the RuneScape Wiki long enough for people to determine whether they are trustworthy.


 * Nomination standards
 * There are no official prerequisites for adminship, other than having an account and having a basic level of trust from other editors and if they can be trusted with administrator tools.


 * Decision process
 * Any user may nominate another user with an account. Self-nominations are permitted. However, if you haven't done much on the wiki, don't expect much support if you self-nominate yourself. The numbers of people supporting, opposing, or expressing another opinion on a candidacy are the main factor in determining whether or not the user will become an admin. Requests will be held for two weeks before a final decision is made. Once this time is up, a bureaucrat will decide whether to make the user an admin or not. In most cases, bureaucrats may only be recommended by other bureaucrats. Because it is good to have a stable amount of active bureaucrats, nominations will be made when one bureaucrat becomes much less active on the wiki.


 * Expressing opinions
 * Any user with an account is welcome to comment in the Support, Oppose and Neutral sections. The candidate may respond to the comments of others. Try to explain your opinion by including a short explanation of your reasoning.

Nominating
Nominations must be accepted by the user in question. If you wish to nominate a user, make sure you let the user know on their talk page.

All nominations should be posted at bottom of this page. Not at top.

What can admins do?
See RuneScape:Administrators

What can I do to help?
To improve your chances of becoming an admin, you should should do some or all of the following as a normal user:


 * Watch Special:Recentchanges and help to revert vandalism even before you're an admin
 * Just because you don't have the [rollback ] feature doesn't mean you can't change vandalized pages back to what they were before. Any "new" pages that you can't delete yourself, just put the speedy deletion template at the top of the page. An admin will see this in Category:Speedy deletion candidates and delete it. This is the primary reason why this wiki needs admins - fighting vandalism and acting as a volunteer to keep this wiki clean, readable, and accurate.


 * Create good content
 * Attempting rewrites of large articles will greatly help your chances of being recommended/accepted, as this is more noticeable in some ways than lots of minor edits to lots of small articles. Where the wiki wins over other sites is our ability to get information out fast simply because everyone has editorial control, even unlogged users. Help write the brand new updates - if someone else is writing the quest guide, make your own notes but start creating the sub-page articles ready to be blue-linked already.


 * Be part of the community
 * Welcome new editors on their talk page and guide them in the right direction. Talk to other editors, engage in the forums and generally show your face around.


 * All decisions should be democratic
 * Regardless of who is suggesting something, whether they be a normal user, an admin, or a bureaucrat, all votes should be counted equal. If you are in the minority on an issue over a certain article, be prepared to back down. Be mature about it. See Runescape:All editors are equal.

Stinkowing
Current Votes:


 * Support - 4
 * Oppose - 1
 * Neutral - 1

I'm not sure if I'd make a good sysop...but I'm not letting that stop me from trying! I'm not as well known as Chia or Whiplash, but I'm still active (in fact, I'm planning for another Wiki-meetup soon...), and I've mainly gotten into editing my userpage and subpages, but I still make fairly decent edits to the mainspace. Though I got a bit ticked off at Total Rune's brother (for spamming about MoparScape) and the recent vandal from my school) I can still keep my cool. I will admit, though, that I am a bit nervous doing this...maybe it's because of the self-nominating thing that I'm so confused about.
 * Oppose No self nominating. 00:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If you read the conversation on the RFA talk page, you would know what's going on with that. 00:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I did. They're talking about getting rid of that self-nominating rule (that's what I interprit anyway).I don't quite understand it, though. Besides, Chia did his this way too.
 * Oppose x2 I don't care how Chia did it. He cheated. You phail. 00:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * A bit angry, are we?
 * God Dammit! 4 edit conflicts. Ok, I was saying... Not you stinkowing, I was talking to total rune. 00:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose x3 If at first you don't succeed, YOU PHAIL. =D 00:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Will you shut the hell up? Just because you didn't make it doesn't mean that you can intimidate other people and bother them. I suggest you calm down and sip some tea. If that doesn't help, just take a week or 2 away from the wiki. 00:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Who's saying I haven't made it? 00:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * *sigh* ... Whatever. 00:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * With an additude like that, Total, you DEFINITLEY won't make it. I mean no offence, but you are one heck of an angry mastodon.
 * You really think I give 2 sh*ts whether I make it or not? Hell no. 00:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

OMG. Isn't this a voting zone? Not an argue zone? Anyway Support Syugecin talkcontribs
 * I'm not 'upposed ta eat da legos..... =( 00:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * And that has to do with what, now? (BTW, even if you WERE supposed to eat the Legos, they'd tear up your stomach...
 * Okey-dokey then.... Syugecin [[Image:Dragon_halberd.png]]talkcontribs and I eat legos too
 * Look! There's Syugecin! *waves* HI SYUGECIN! 00:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Woah, this is really delayed, but the no-self-nominating-rule-thing wasn't created until after I was sysoped. 02:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. You are well-known to me! :) And total rune...you are just asking to get a month's block off the wiki. Talk-to Cashman286 (Level 48)  16:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral. No reason. ^^ 14:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Support.--15:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Support I thought you were a sysop already. In my eyes I think you have the admin kind of cut...if you know what I mean... 05:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Question.. should total rune votes count now? 14:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - I expected you to be a sysop before I would be. I think you shouldve been made a sysop before I was made one. 14:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I say, not enough support votes to become admin. (And with the number we have currently, and the current work on the RfA system...) Maybe after the RfA system is fixed up? Oddlyoko talk 23:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Mr Pker
I want to be an admin because I have removed a few vandals posts and warned them on their talk pages, like the ip address that signed as xx echo x3 or something like that. I am really active on the forums and I like welcoming new users to the wiki. i like cleaning after the vandals like a janitor. Please vote for friendly neighborhood Mr Pker =). Please vote for me to be a forum admin at least.

Final Votes
 * Support - 0
 * Oppose - 8
 * Neutral - 0


 * I must say... Hesitant Oppose. You aren't well known. Plus, I figured out that there is no such thing as only a forum sysop... =/ Syugecin [[Image:Dragon_halberd.png]]talkcontribs 01:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * NEUTRAL - You aren't well known, and there isn't currently no such thing as forum sysop, but there may be eventually. 02:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

OpposeI do think you would make a good forum mod. As for a admin... well, youve only made 2 mainspace edits. Tesfan 12:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. 12:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. 13:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. 14:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose :( Per above... Sorry you had to be my first oppose... 00:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: Ditto for me, unless a position as Forum Mod can be created. Chaoticar 05:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: Agree with Tesfan. 2 mainspace edits is not good enough to even qualify for an admin. Sorry man, but, you're just not good enough. 06:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: Per above. I think we can safely close this RfA. Oddlyoko talk 23:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Patcong (2)
Current Votes:
 * Support - 4
 * Oppose - 2
 * Neutral - 1

Ummmm....I was told I can nominate myself here here it goes...(Crosses two fingers)00:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 *  SOFT OPPOSE - You seem very worthy of adminship, but you had a 2 week break, just got back, and I think it's a bit soon after to have been gone. Translation: You were inactive, came back, and should wait a bit (just my opinion.). 01:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh. Maybe get active again and it'll work. For now, Light oppose 11:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I am active.21:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are, but you just got back. I'll support once time gets around to going to 00:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC) 'cus then you would've been back for a week or so.  23:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral =\ 23:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose, Well, you were quite active, but I don't think that alone is enough admin quality. You seem to be quite hotheaded anyway. I've seen and had arguments with you, so, you know... [[Image:AuroraSig.png|So I heard you like MudKips...]] 05:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Support Patcong is a great editor, and he has a sense of humor to go along with it. Woohoo for Patcong!!! Talk-to Cashman286 (Level 50)  20:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you mate! Finally I got a support lol.20:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Support!! I change my mind! I support! =D 04:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * SUPPORT He is a good friend, and is always friendly. He would make a good admin.[[image:Guthix book.png|27px]] Guthix Crusader [[Image:Guthix staff.png|27px]] Website 23:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks all of you gus and moogel sorry about what happened to us a long time ago.23:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support... Um.. I thought you already were one or I would have nominated you myself. :)14:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this is 23 hours late, but SUPPORT! 23:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yay! Seems like it's going pretty good. Not many people voting for me though.=(23:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral now I've come to the conclusion that there is already too many sysops. 00:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Awww man...*crys*01:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Tesfan
Support – 5

Oppose – 0

Neutral - 2

I am going to go ahead and nominate myself. For quick reference, my edit count is here and my contributions are here. I have about 600 mainspace edits, and 1,200 total edits. I have made 6 pages, and while some of my edits will be minor, I have also made some bigger edits, such as adding the “runes required” table to the lunar spells table.

Why do I want to become an admin? Two reasons:

1. The ability to delete unwanted pages: One good example is when my friend, kathooloo2, posted a thread in the market place. He then later asked for it to be deleted, and I put up a speedy deletion tag on it. I checked back 4 days later, and it was still there. I do not think this would happen as often if I were an admin.

2. The ability to stop vandals: I check the recent changes almost all the time when I am on the computer, even when I am playing RuneScape. I was there when the infamous Buck Nell vandal was there. Buck Nell went on a vandalizing rampage, and blanked at least 15 pages and vandalized for at least 10 minuets (I know 10 minuets doesn’t seem like a lot of time, but trust me, when a vandal is on runescape wiki, 10 minuets seems like forever) before a admin could block him. All the while I could do nothing but undo page after page while Buck Nell continued to vandalize the wiki. Again, I do not think this would not happen as often if I were an admin. Tesfan 23:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support! Nice going Tesfan! 23:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * SUPPORT x300! What a completely unexpected surprise...It's a about time! =D 00:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support, albeit reluctant only because I think we have too many sysops. Still, count it as a Support, because I think you're worthy of adminship. Oddlyoko talk 00:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support! 14:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Ekk... I don't know. Neutral for now. I want to say there are bit many admins. Plus, a couple have come back. I think you are ready but I'm not ready to say anything quite yet. 14:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral, per above. 23:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment If you think that is the case, then why did you vote for patcong?Tesfan 23:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh LOL, I forgot about that. I voted for him about 3 minutes before I did for you. 00:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Support 16:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Cashman286 (3)
Support – 2

Oppose – 4

Neutral - 0

I just made my 500th edit, and I am seeking sysop powers. As I covered this already, people will oppose for this reason or that, but as long as I get an idea of what the community thinks of me, I'll be fine. Just 1 bit of advice: I'd like you to support intead of oppose. Cashman286<Font color="black">talk contribs editcount my RFA|undefined 16:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - I think you really deserve it. You're a helpful contributor, a positive voice, you help people not so experienced, you have a large presence in the wiki and on the forums and you're always doing what's right. 16:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * SupportAwesome editor and good friend. He deserves the sysop powers!17:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Pending I dunno, on 1 hand, you don't have that many edits, only 59 mainspace edits, but I know its not just about the edits, so im not going to say oppose or support just yet. Tesfan 18:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

OPPOSE - Not that I think you're bad, but you only have 59 mainspace edits (said above) and only 500 total edits. I think all admins should have 1,000 edits atleast, and 300 mainspace edits. Also, we are gettting to have a lot of admins, I might start saying we have too many. 23:41, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. Tesfan 03:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above Chaoticar 03:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose what would have invalidated the vote that just ended? I would think a failed vote would be a sign to you to wait for at least a month, not 5 minutes (literally)...This is just getting ridiculous.

*cries* That's not very nice. =-( And I thought I had about 69-70 something mainspace edits. Either way, I won't mention any names, but I'm not very impressed with some---not all---some of our newest sysops, and if these people can make it, I think I deserve it, too. I've been trying to keep my composure, but this is too one-sided. I wanted an archive because I just reached a good milestone. Cashman286<Font color="black">talk contribs editcount my RFA|undefined 12:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Who is that directed at? Tesfan 14:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

And great. I get even more god damned opposes than the last time. Cashman286<Font color="black">talk contribs editcount my RFA|undefined 12:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. 12:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh my god, you people hate me. You support everyone else just because they have more mainspace edits than me. But should it really matter? I say no! Mainspace edits don't mean anything if the user is a total jerk. I don't see why some of you are so prejudiced against people with few article edits. It's irrational, it's ridiculous how one user decided that people with not many mainspace edits are looked down on. It seems like if this serial killer got 1000 main edits, they would sysop him! But what if a really nice guy had only, say, 70 mainspace edits. No chance at all. It also seems that everyone who supported me previously either opposes now (with the exception of Ilyas) or doesn't vote at all. I am so fed up with these stupid "per above" votes, since that is no reason to oppose! I am pissed off. But nobody can understand what I would do for the wiki if they would just sysop me! I also really want to see previous discussions of deleted pages, but being normal doesn't let me do that! If there was a huge vandal attack like on April 19th, you can't rely on me. I can't do squat about it. To sum it up, These are sucky reasons to oppose me. Wow, that felt good to let put my anger, even if it did take me 10 minutes... Cashman286<Font color="black">talk contribs editcount my RFA|undefined 18:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't know you that well, so I can't say support because "your a nice person". There are 100's of nice people on this wiki, all who would benifit from being a syops. Why should you be one? (That's not an attack, it's a question). Tesfan 19:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Because it seems that everyone is being sysoped now, and I don't wanna be left out. Cashman286<Font color="black">talk contribs editcount my RFA|undefined 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Sacre Fi
Rationale:

Why do we need another bureaucrat? Vimescarrot and Eucarya have both announced their intentions to take a step back from the Wiki. With the loss of activity from these two, we lost two of the most influential voices on the Wiki. You can toss around the "all editors are equal" policy around as much as you want, but that will not negate the fact that people listen to bureaucrats more than others. Why? Because bureaucrats have more experience and are clearly more trusted by the community as a whole.

I have noticed that as a community, we have been reduced to a group of bickering editors, with people turning a community-based project into an arena for personal attacks and unrelated banter. I believe another active bureaucrat, complementing Whiplash's recent promotion, will help bring some focus back to the Wiki.

Why Sacre Fi? Sacre Fi has gained respect within the community as evidenced by his recent promotion to sysop. People use adjectives like "helpful" and "guiding" when describing Sacre. Even more important, Sacre has proven himself able to keep his head in absolutely every situation. While most editors despise and try to ban those who vandalize, Sacre will presume innocence and actually invite those very people to join the community in a meaningful way. On top of all this, Sacre is very well-spoken and clear. I trust his judgment more than anyone else on the Wiki, and believe that he has every ability to perform the highest level duties.

If Sacre Fi accepts this nomination, I open the door for discussion.


 * Well, people keep forgetting my nomination as a vote, so formally I say support.

Current Votes
 * Support - 13
 * Oppose - 4
 * Neutral - 2

I accept! :) 03:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I Oppose - Three reasons:


 * 1) I've been here longer than Sacre, and I don't think I've been here long enough.
 * 2) Whip was just b'cratted, I think we should have some down time before 'cratting somone else.
 * 3) I think that we don't need any more b'crats.
 * 03:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to argue, but:
 * 1) Time doesn't exactly make the editor; it really depends on the trustworthiness and responsibility of the editor (neither are qualities I hold). =0
 * 2) Would it make any difference if a person was elected to bureaucrat a month after another instead of a week?
 * 3) Um... =\
 * 04:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - No offense but after Whip's 'cratting I don't think we need another 'crat. Chaoticar 08:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. We only have one really active crat, and you're saying we have too many? Hmm. I've been gone too long to comment, but Sacre certainly seemed like an ideal candidate for cratship. (Note: I'm assuming Hyenaste is still barely semi-active and that Eucarya realy is stepping back.) JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot  09:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I say Support until otherwise noted. <font color="NAVY">Syugecin [[Image:Dragon_halberd.png]]<font color="RED">talk<font color="RED">contribs


 * I really Support Sacre! Go! Go! Go! Go! 12:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Slightly sad support - I guess I will spend my days as a lowly admin. Sacre is great at convincing vandals to act nice, and he deserves this. 12:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Support great intelligent user. --Whiplash 14:17, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Just be happy you are an admin, and Support. You are worthy of the power. <Font color="gold">Talk-to <Font color="gold">Cashman286 <Font color="red">(Level 48)  22:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Support. If my being the first - or the second, not sure if X1101 or whatever the numbers where was one before me - b'crat makes any difference, I say Sacre deseves it. I see him (her?) talked about as a good person with good edits, which rules out your reason 1 for opposing - whatever else you might say, Sacre! - and I think we could use another b'crat. Considering Vimes and Eucarya are supposedly stepping back a bit - them being great editors, that will be a sore loss - we could use Sacre Fi. :) Oddlyoko 23:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't mean to be stubborn (even though I am) but this supports my reason #3 even more. Oddlyoko came back so we have another crat. 23:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Chia, could you just this one time justify yourself? I mean, you object on these grounds but don't say why.  Why do we not need another bureaucrat?  I have fully justified my reasons for believing we need another bureaucrat, what is your justification?
 * We have 3.5 b'crats here. Oddlyoko, Whip, Hyenaste, and Eucarya (but I heard he's leaving so that's a 0.5). 3 people alone can handle sysoping people and every other b'crat thing. Everyone has their own opinion, and with frredom of speach I can say my opinion. We have like 25 editors here (not including forum only editors), so with 3 active b'crats that's 12% of this wiki being a b'crat. With Sacre being b'cratted, that'd make it 17%. It would go from about 1/10 to 1/5.
 * It's not that I don't like Sacre, he is a swell man and editor, but I just think we have enough b'crats. And with freedom of speach and vote I can say my opinion and vote accordingly to my opinion. 14:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Do not mistake my call for justification as an attack on your rights Chia. I never said you weren't entitled to your opinion.  On the contrary, I was trying to see if there was a reason behind that opinion, and you have given it.  Just because someone asks you to justify yourself does not mean they don't respect your opinion. Usually it's the opposite, they respect your opinion enough to try to make an effort to see your point of view.  So cut it out with this "I'm allowed to disagree cause it's my right" crap.  And I do appreciate that you have stated your reasons for that opinion, don't get me wrong.
 * Support I've been impressed with everything that Sacre Fi does, and although some think we have too many b'crats, why not have another?  What would it hurt?  Sacre Fi certainly qualifies in many ways, would do a good job, and so far I haven't heard a strong enough reason why he should NOT become a b'crat.  It wouldn't bother me one bit.  Everyone is entitled to their opinion, I just don't necessarily agree with some of those opinions.  16:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose -- I'm sorry, you're a great editor and all but Oddlyoko just returned and Whiplash was cratted over the weekend. Do we really need 7 crats, 6 of which are active? I think we have enough. 22:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support - I recently sent my RFA on a crash collision into Opposed-ness....and I've made amends with everyone.....and ever since I swirlied my brother and came to the wiki, Sacre Fi was there....through thick and thin, he was there. Sacre, this Support is for you man, you're the bomb. 22:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I just realized that I can connect to Mega on what he said... 22:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Note:Bureaucrats are, according to the above rules, supposed to be nominated by Bureaucrats, not Admins or ordinary Users. Chaoticar 08:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Does that mean that we have to stop this? <:O 14:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No. --Whiplash 15:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice try. First, it says "in most cases", which really doesn't mean much, and second, two bureaucrats have already given their support so it really doesn't matter who initiated the nomination.
 * What do you mean 'nice try'? I was just pointing it out. Just because I point out a fact, doesn't mean I'm attempting to derail his Nomination or something. Chaoticar 04:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreeing with Endasil here, but without the "nice try". Oddlyoko talk 04:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, my "nice try" was directed to Chia, whose post I was responding to. It looked like he was going to try to take the easy way to a failed nomination.  The point was valid and I'm glad you brought it up.  While I'm responding, I've noticed that everyone who has opposed so far has only opposed on the grounds that there are too many 'crats already.  If this were not the case, and you agreed that we needed another bureaucrat, could you shed some light on your opinion of Sacre as the next 'crat?
 * With the surge in RFA I can assume taht some people just think this would go along the lines of an adminship request. However, a crat is a much more complicated thing. My vote still remains Oppose - All to respect. 20:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I hope this doesn't hurt Sacre's feelings (it's not supposed to), but I think some more experienced admins should become a b'crat for having more experience. 14:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No offense taken. :) What experience might I be missing? The amount of time spent here? 19:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Very Weak yet still Oppose-Like chia said, Whiplash has just became a beauracrat, and I trust strongly in whiplash. Creating more and more of these will just be a swarm of flies and not as important.  Vimescarrot has left, and all... But I believe Whiplash can handle it.  Sacrefi would be a great addition to the Beaurecrats, but NOT NOW.  Also to edit well you need to play well, and Sacrefi has a lack of activity on the game.  He would just be a voice, and not that much of an editor. 14:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, I really hate to keep having to explain this to you guys. Being a bureaucrat has absolutely NOTHING to do with your ability to edit articles.  You have full control over article editing WITHOUT bureaucrat, so how come people coming back to that as a basis for arguing admin/cratship?  In my opinion, you could fulfill the duties of bureaucrat having never even played Runescape.
 * To what Chia said: I think we should leave it this way for now. 02:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. It is always good to have a crat with the right attitude and commitment to serving the wiki audience and contributors. Vimes Sacre Fi is a good candidate in my opinion. I really dont see a problem with having a slightly higher number of crats. Unless they start fighting amongst eachother, which seems completely unlikely. Hence my support. --Miw 20:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear, this nomination is for Sacre Fi, not Vimescarrot. Maybe I misunderstood your statement, I just want to make sure you are voting for the person you think you are :)
 * Oops my bad. Of course i support Sacre Fi, and this does not mean anything negative towards either Vimes nor Sacre Fi. --Miw 18:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Theres only 4 b'crats... soooo.... Support. Blankothe3rd 16:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * SUPPORT!! :) ...Best user ever... 00:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Neutral I originally thought "oppose", because we already have 5 bureaucrats (which i think is sufficient) but after reading the rationale that Eucarya and Vimescarrot are going to be inactive, I agree with Endasil that a new active crat (like Whiplash recently) might do some good. However, I have to say that I don't know what Sacre Fi is like. I've seen him/her a few times here and there, but only rarely. So I'm going with Neutral. [[Image:AuroraSig.png|So I heard you like MudKips...]] 05:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Suppose (Support/Oppose), wait, err Neutral! Err wait that wasn't it... ah I know Suhpo't! 00:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I regret saying this (not that I hate Sacre but just that I don't think we need another crat) but when will we get this over with? 00:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


 * This is going to be another long nomination. And quantity of a type of user dosent really effect nominations thank you very much. --Whiplash 00:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Support He is very good at editing, and very nice to people.
 * Don't forget to sign your comments. 15:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Oh yeah, sorry 'bout that.
 * It's been agreed, the overwelming support for Sacre shows that he should be made a crat. Can someone get this over with and then we'll archive it? And think about it this way, this is a very long nomination but we'll not have another crat nomination for a while after this. 17:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)