RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Jack Spiral1

Jack Spiral1
Jack, has been one of those editors, in my views, who has a basic instinct for helping others, whether it be on RuneScape, or on the RuneScape Wiki. Never before have I seen Jack, tell somebody "To do it themselves" or "Just read a guide", no, he has helped them to the best of his ability.

Jack, is somebody I trust, and I'm sure many other users trust him as well, altough his edit count maybe lower than others, and he lack edits in vital places, I think that having administrator tools is not just about having a certain amount of edits, but having a certain flair for giving aid, where aid is needed.

As his work with the Wiki post is to point out, Jack has proven to be determined, and committed to tasks he embarks upon, never departing until the job in hand is done, that is a trait of jacks' that I've grown to admire, and I'm sure it's a trait that is sought after in an administrator.

Altough certain events in the Chat chat have left a rather malignant dim upon Jack, which have all been sorted out. I trust that he can use the tools, if given, to help make the wiki a better place for other editors, and future editors in times to come. 00:14, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

''I, Jack Spiral1, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,'' [candidate signs here].

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?

'''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?'''

Discussion
Support - Nuff said. I hope I can vote before he signs! 00:25, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Jack has shown that he is able to commit to something and not let go. I know him well, and from that I know, I know that he has the maturity to handle the sysop tools. 00:26, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I am sorry, but Jack seems to be lacking in many vital areas. I normally don't consider things like mainspace edits and yewgrove, but I was forced to since there is so little else that I could judge him on. He has only made 267 mainspace edits in total (that is only slightly more then his userpage or talkpage edit totals); has some history of making bad judgements (Very very bad judgement made 2 weeks ago...); adminship would give him more power which means that if he makes a bad judgement again, he would be able to do more; the only majorwiki-helping contribution he has made are the RSWNP which don't require and the tools; his doesn't seem to preview edits before he saves(like this) or write edit summaries and lastly he seems to be inactive on the wiki always. I am sorry Jack, you are a great, well respected and vital member of the wiki, but there are too many faults for me to support you. 00:47, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Evil, the edit summary link doesn't show an edit summary, I also checked in the history, and none of Jacks edits had a summary 00:54, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoops! I put it next to the wrong part of the sentence. 00:56, February 14, 2010 (UTC)