User talk:Atlandy

Archives
 * 1) Start- Nov 11 2007
 * 2) Nov 12- June 18 2008
 * 3) June 19- Feb 4 2009
 * 4) Feb 5 2009- March 25 2010

"Accident"???!?!?!?
You don't blank the hellhound charm log on accident and then mostly blank the hellhounds page on ACCIDENT. 18:49, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * He made 5 different edits deleting stuff, once...or even twice...I might call an accident...5 TIMES??!??! no way.  18:54, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Revert
Can you revert the edits done by User:Earthzooka on page: Template:Infobox_Item.

The reason: He/She has not: Thoroughly discussed and achieved CONSENSUS with the community, either on the Yew Grove or on this template's talk page, to go ahead with the changes you wish to make

I can't revert so thanks, 18:59, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Easter Pic
There's nothing wrong with my picture or it's size, thank you anyway. --Sw0rd1801 16:15, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape Wiki Post Newsletter: The Golden Quill Awards!
This automated newsletter message was sent by QBot on 00:32, March 30, 2010 (UTC).

Re: User of the month
Hey, thanks for nominating me for the user of the month. Glad to know that my contributions are noticed. :) Just hope that other people think the same! Lil cloud 9 21:06, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

About your signature
Hi Atlandy, I saw that your signature is putting its raw code in the pages you sign, instead of. I was wondering if you knew that the signature policy chnaged so that users may no longer put their signature code into the articles. Psycho created a nice template for this.

Your signature
Hello,. It has come to my attention you are signing with an untemplated signature. This is against the wiki's signature policy because signature code can make pages quite large as well as interfere with other code on the page. To make a templated signature, first create the page [ Template:Signatures/], then paste your signature code. After the last character of your code, without hitting enter or inserting a line break, add this:

Once you have your code pasted in the template page, go to your preferences, ensure that "Custom Signature" is checked, and paste this into the "Signature" field:

After doing this, typing ~ should result in appearing instead of the entire code for your signature. If you have any problems, please tell me on my talk page and I will be able to help you.

Thanks, 18:04, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

18:03, April 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Seriously, you need to address this before you sign your name again man. How does it look when we jump all over new users that fail to comply but heres a long time sysop ignoring policy? Thanks,--Degenret01 23:52, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Letter from Uberfuzzy
In light of some recent events here I thought it would be of benefit to share out this letter that Uberfuzzy wrote to Azaz129 with all our active sysops, and he has agreed to let me do so. This is not meant as a slap at any one for recent actions, just as some food for thought about us and where we want to be as a wiki. As you and your wiki has shown in the past, a large stable community can exist and be fairly self sufficient at Wikia, with little need from staff/helper intervention. This is a dream of ours, to have more wikis run themselves, allowing us to focus our finite amount of time and resources on the sites that actually need it. Sadly, your wiki is an exception in many ways, not the norm.

As with the checkuser, we've shown that we're willing to try things out, to break away from the mentality of "how things were done in the past" to see how they fair in the ever evolving world of wikis, and to get some real world data on how a stable wiki will react if allowed more rights. You've been great test of our theoretical worries about granting checkuser where needed.

Done. You bureaucrats can now add and remove bot rights.

One thing We've always admired about your wiki is even though you have a way above average number of sysops, you have managed to keep the bureaucrat list small, showing that you understand what that roll is meant for, and not just another checkbox. We hope to continue to see good things come out of runescape, and can continue to use it as a shining example of our dream.-Uberfuzzy --Degenret01 08:52, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Birthday
Thanks! 12:05, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

A Quick Question
Just a quick question... is it possible to un-block someone who was blocked infientidly. Can you un-block them if they were innocent, such as someone using their account, or it being an extermely long time being blocked? Thank You...Stopme 06:05, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

QQ
just wondering what was wrong with that last edit? 17:26, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * no problem :) 17:32, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

while your here
would u mind removing the page "Duneoneering/Music" (typo intended) someone must have made it and copied all the music in there, just changed it into a redirect for the time being thanks 17:39, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Messed up
All the dung herbs have messed up names. Can you delete the page Clean sagewort and move Clean Sagewort over there? Thanks 13:05, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * The capital is wrong =o 13:09, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Another tasks for you =), delete Clean valerian and move Valerian there (leave redirect) 13:21, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Blocking users
Hello, I just wanted to stop by and tell that I don't think that just one edit deserve a block. Of course, as an admin, it is your decision, and I respect it, but most of the users make their first edits as a test edit, to see if they really can change the page. Thanks. 18:25, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * I can see your point, and of course everyone can understand that it's vandalism to add that, however, as I said, most people don't even know if what they wrote will actually show up on the page. They just add it to see if it'd work, and I can see that most of those people won't have constructive edits after that first one, there's a possiblity that they'll be a helpful contributor. Take me as an example, my first edit to this wiki was pure vandalism, and I just recieved a warning. If I was blocked, I'd feel that it was unfair, and not use this website anymore. 18:32, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Triumvirate
Greetings,

The RSWP is happy to inform you that the wiki has joined the Triumvirate. Those interested in taking part, please sign up here.

Cheers,

The RSWP

This automated newsletter message was sent by QBot on 03:05, June 5, 2010 (UTC).

Can you show me?
Hey, can you show me how to create the speedy deletion thingymajig? Thanks

Re: AGF=
I would have assumed a good faith edit but after the IP had blanked and added nonsense (http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special_attacks&diff=2824338&oldid=2824335). Will keep in mind. 19:14, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

WTTHHH??! WHYYY DO YOU KEEP DELETING ANYTHING THAT SAYS GRIFT?! I for a fact know LOADS of people that call it Grift because they dont want to sound like an idiot calling it "dung". HOWW CAN EDITS IN SLANG EVEN BE REMOVED?!! ARGGH! Let it be!

Unprotect File:Wiki.png
Could you unprotect this for a bit? I have a compressed version. 17:56, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 95% of original filesize =D Thanks, 17:59, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Thanks
Sure thing, that'll be $37.50. (p.s. thank god our logo is now 95% of its original size) 19:21, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

RfA
I can't say that you know me all that well. I'm a bit argumentative-it's just kind of how my brain works. I hadn't found the guide to RfAs until midway through my first one. So...those combined facts were why I was so aggressive on that one, and for that I apologize. I would like to think that I have kept my cool for longer than 3 weeks. I may not be the most mature person around, but I'm also far from the least mature. Also, I did not understand blocking 3 months ago (as seen from the top of your talk page). However, I'd like to bring something to your attention. You didn't block someone who made 5 different edits, and yet shown here, here, and here you blocked someone for recreating a page only a minute after you had given them a final warning. Many new players don't pick up on the messages right away. Do you think this could have been a bit premature? And the "Sniping" article had a chance to become a very useful, well-written article if it had been given time. Could you please explain this to me? Thanks, 21:35, July 6, 2010 (UTC)