User talk:Liquidhelium

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole.

1st
first

2nd
second 21:31, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Grats
grats Raglough (talk) 09:16, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Noob
noob - 21:18, August 27, 2014 (UTC)

Stuff
When are you normally online? Catch me ingame, there's something I'd like to discuss. 18:17, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * More convenient than you may think. I'm in Cambridge, MA at the moment, wanna meet up? I'm going to MIT today anyway... 10:09, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * 03:02, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

200M magic
I wanna give you my final magic drop 02:15, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

Christmas event
You can still get all the Christmas cosmetics, or at least the cheery ones, by doing a spot of snowboarding. Takes less than an hour, I'd estimate. I did it, got the snowstormer thingy which is quite fancy in my opinion, and I only did that today. Might want to try it! Minnakht (talk) 12:49, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage
I support same-sex marriage.

Love, 04:45, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

RFCCA
As someone who is very inactive in the CC, I feel the need to ask you to justify your closure of this thread. There is a huge amount of consensus for 5-x to receive back his admin rank, and most of the negative comments come from people who aren't even members of the clan. 11:27, January 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree with Bloo. In addition, you closed a discussion which was still very much active. 18:40, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * The request had reached the end of its fortnight run. Requests do not stay open indefinitely to serve the possibility that someone might want to add another comment. 18:50, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * Discussion was still going on. Liquid just killed that. He should have extended the discussion period. 18:53, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * liquid y do u do all of the things wrong 19:48, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * The discussion had exhausted basically all of the relevant points. I did not think that there was something new that someone could have brought up to change the course of the discussion. 23:40, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * What made you think there was no consensus? 23:51, January 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * See response on bloo's talk page. 23:59, January 10, 2015 (UTC)

How was there "sufficient hesitation"? There were two people who said "not yet", versus eleven who said "yes". I know we don't just tally votes, but this is ridiculous. You should have at least given the discussion more time. 10:37, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Like I said in my response, I treated everyone who said that he/she would prefer waiting for the discussion to end as a not yet. I also ran this by two others before closing, and they agreed with the closure. 21:10, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * I feel that that is a poor stance given that he has little to nothing to do with the thread. The "not yet" voters mainly focused on the fact that there was too much going on rather than 5-x not being ready yet, since he was not involved in the YG thread. Also, didn't he leave before all of this started? I don't see how he can be held in the same light as the others who left during the madness. In addition to their arguments being weak, the opposers seemed to be biased and their arguments were rebuked. If anything, the deadline should have been extended with a note on why & where the discussion should have gone from there, imo. 21:19, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that it was a good argument, given that the events discussed there affected 5-x, and his actions were part of the thread. Even if we accept that the not yets were focused primarily on there being too much going on, I would still argue that it is not a weak argument given that said users would want to evaluate future RfCCAs in the context of the results of the clan chat discussion. I agree that some opposers were biased, and I gave much less weight to those arguments. However, I do not believe that the majority of these users were biased. 00:35, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Who are the two people you asked? 09:11, January 13, 2015 (UTC)
 * I poked Gareth and Cqm. 16:10, January 13, 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I am sorry to bring this up again but I still feel unhappy about the way this thread was closed. I was one of the people that argued that this rfcca should not take place until after the thread about the cc was closed (on that thread). I did not suggest this because of my opinion about 5-x’ suitability to be a clan admin, rather I thought that the outcomes of the cc thread might influence how the rfcca would be run and throw up information that would be relevant to the rfcca. So I’m disappointed that this has been taken to mean that my position was “not yet” and then assumed to mean that I would oppose 5-x becoming cc admin. I think some of the other people who argued this may also feel unhappy about the inferences made from their arguments.

If you do not look at the “not yets” and people concerned about the rfcca being run while the cc thread was still open, there are only a few people who opposed 5-x becoming an admin again. As you said yourself, some of the arguments made by people opposing were not very convincing and the people who made them seemed to be biased. There were also some sincere and relevant concerns raised, though there were only a few of these. Because of this I am not convinced that there was enough reason to close the thread as having no consensus. I am not assuming that you did so consciously, but I think you (and also Gaz and Cqm) may have let your own opinions influence the way that the thread was closed. I would like to see the rfcca either be re-opened to allow more discussion (if you, Gaz or Cqm have concerns that you think are relevant then I would gladly see them discussed) or be re-closed by someone else.

Thanks 13:19, January 17, 2015 (UTC)


 * My understanding is that people usually take the stance “not now” if they believe that a candidate is not ready to receive a rank at the moment. This is considerably different to people wanting to wait because they are concerned about the current state of the clan. This first I would consider sufficient hesitation, while the second I think should have been handled differently. You have discussed this several times now, but as I pointed out in my first post I was not happy with the way the rfcca was closed (having read your responses to other people about this). After your response directly to me I’m still not convinced of how you took the decision to close it as having no consensus. I could talk to another admin about re-opening or re-closing the rfcca and I will do this if you will not consider doing anything about this. However it’s disappointing that you will not consider making changes yourself, after having several people question the decision that you’ve made. 10:13, January 18, 2015 (UTC)

Same-sex Rfccas
I support same-sex RFCCA Closures.

Love, 00:48, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

Support 00:50, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

I marry same-support sex. 00:54, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

RE
Cool, but it's not like I'd leave the house to see you.

I heard Massachusetts literally turned into snow. 18:18, February 5, 2015 (UTC)

Hey mate, hope you are well
On this day, at this time, I achieved 99 Construction. Raglough (talk) 04:00, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Marijuana
Is legal in DC. Might hit home soon. Maybe you and I can light up a doobie in Baltimore one day. 23:10, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * not surprising at all that liquidhelm is doing the marijuanas Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:38, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * did you know bill clinton did the marijuanas -- 17:40, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * i bet he was blazing it up with helm and monica Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:43, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * guys gtfo we're 420 together get ur own doobies 17:44, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * you all gtfo from my talk page. especially you, ajrabbitz 15:09, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
 * wow. nice to see you too. btw elune made some nice userbox i thought you might like it: User:Elune Anzu/Userbox/420 for immediate publishing on your userpage :D Ajraddatz (Talk) 05:25, April 14, 2015 (UTC)

Rawr
Ohai! 22:10, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * Say hi to everyone for me <3 22:28, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Warning
I am nice, but this one had pmed me and flamed at me after tellinghim I will provide him with information, and continue not to leave me alone when I asked him to stop. I accept the warning, And I do understand, but do inform him that editing the page just because he showed information. I also did nothing against him if it was on the Edit summery, I thought I had deleted it into something else, and I do apologies to that. Thank you, and please keep an eye on The Godless page incase it goes into unblock, as The Mol Man also reverted the page before I did anything, (as  Ireverted it once) Other people will jump intto it soon. 04:15, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

I do have some concerns of course I do not wish to put it in here, May I go ahead and Pm you in game? or would you have me post it here? 14:29, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

Log in
You might want to confirm this edit is you. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 08:57, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

Slipping standards, tsk
Check your userpage! The Liquid I know would never have left it in a state of disrepair like that. 21:40, June 13, 2015 (UTC)

blocked
Hi, well my concern came in now, may I know why I was blocked? I was given no warning, or notification about it, may I know why?? 21:41, June 15, 2015 (UTC)

deletion of talk page
The talk page you deleted had a valid message on it, you are a bad DDD violater :(. [ VSTF  ] 00:13, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

hi
13:44, July 14, 2015 (UTC)

Closure
Can you check over Talk:The Godless for consensus? The users involved are stubborn and won't come to a neutral admin. Thanks, 18:24, July 19, 2015 (UTC)


 * It has come to a consensus and should be righted based on these statements: Kinglink: " Vorago tried to do this alone" and "it only proved that each factions were allied.", and by Kane: "Scopulus acted as representative of both Vorago and the Godless on a temporary basis" And by myself stating that Vorago was only a temporary ally and by in game dialog from Scopulus, Vorago, Moia, and Kamiee.Kcin2424 (talk) 18:43, July 19, 2015 (UTC)