User talk:Chiafriend12

'''This is my new talk page. For my first archived talk page click here, or for my second archived page, click here, or for my third archive, click here. Watch out, the third archive may take more than a minute to load on hi-speed connections. Thank you, and remember to use propper gammer. --Chia'''

Just to tell everyone this, I don't want any nonsense talk on my talk page. By nonsense talk I mean stuff like: "hi i lyke ur templ8 can i yoose it". So, please use atleast semi-proper grammer when you put something on this page. As of 04:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC), there should be no more nonsense talk. Thank you. Chiafriend12 (Contribs) This page has been declared a nonsense talk free zone.

Redirects
What the hell. Christine Talk 14:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Safing
...Oops. Sorry, Chia. I do things without thinking sometimes. >< 13:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Ciao from Chicago
Hello there, I was wondering about the whole "clan". I feel like we've disbanded, but if I am wrong, then would we be able to set up a clan chat channel for ourselves? I mean, if we disbanded, I wouldn't mind being a ronin or something of that sort (more mascochistic points there). Please reply on my talk page, rather than your own. Well, by now. 02:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've had a summmer of soul-searching, I've found my heart in what I want to do in my life, and all that's left is to go and do it. 02:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Your block
''For this reason, opposes are no longer accepted, so please simply do not vote if you don't think that a candidate deserves to be featured. Adding oppose to a vote nomination will result in an immediate block for a minimum of one week, as it will be considered a personal attack.''


 * As per new UotM rules that you have ignored by adding oppose to my nomination, you've been blocked from editing the wiki for one week for a personal attack. Don't unblock yourself, and if anyone else does they better explain to me why you're exempt from the rules unlike anyone else. Christine Talk 23:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Shit. I didn't mean to instantly cause controversy, but it appears that I have. Recently, someone (I haven't checked) added a policy which stated that anyone who voted oppose on the UotM page would be immediately blocked. Shortly before Chia voted oppose, I revised that policy and stated that the block would last a minimum of one week. I did this because I think that we need to take a strong stance to prevent further flame wars. Since Chia's oppose occurred soon after the policy was added and almost immediately after it was revised, and the policy is intended to prevent flames, which his vote was not, I think that giving Chia a warning and placing a temporary reminder on the top of the UotM page should suffice in this case, and help prevent confusion in the near future, however I will leave Chia's fate to Christine, as the attack was made on her. 00:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This is why recent changes should be checked. Christine Talk 00:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I've put up a reminder at the top of the UotM page. We can take it off in a week or so. To clarify, Whiplash added the policy originally, at 10:54 A.M. this morning (August 15th, times are EST). I revised the policy at 7:26 P.M. tonight (still August 15th) and Chia made his oppose at 7:36, 10 minutes later. 00:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Personal attacks derserve AT MOST a 2 hour block. I agree with you on most things, Christine, but blocking someone for a week because they said "Soft oppose", is, to put it nicely, silly. 00:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I'm not the one who came up with the policy, (no, that's the guy who was whining because other rules made before weren't decided with "community consensus" (even though they WERE in the IRC) then he goes and makes his own rules ffs) I'm just following the rules. -.- Christine Talk 00:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)a

Well, the rules have been changed. I’m just following the blocking policy. Please don't reblock him =/ 00:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Tes, as the author of the policy, I fully support its statement that anyone who opposes a nomination for UotM will be blocked for a minimum of one week. This was implemented to address the pressing issue of flame wars in the voting. If you disagree with the policy and think that I was wrong to change it without universal agreement, I'd like to hear your suggestion to prevent flame wars and end the chaos on that page. Otherwise, I believe that the policy should remain, as flame wars should not be a recurring issue. I'm sure that everyone agrees with that point, at least. Also, if you had taken some time to evaluate the situation before intervening, you would have realized that the policy was changed ten minutes before Chia opposed, and although he was in clear violation of it, he was unaware of the changes when he voted. I took some liberty with the situation, and in an effort to solve any issues quickly, I gave my agreement to any decision Christine made regarding Chia's violation of the policy. I stand by her decision, as she was the one attacked. You were a late arrival on the case, and if you decide that a weeklong block is too harsh a punishment for Chia's offence and intervene, I will oppose your actions, and contact the bureaucrats and a staff member if necessary. I don't appreciate the strength of the policy bring undermined, as this policy needs to be as strict as it is. If this situation escalates, we will all be accountable for our own actions, and I will feel justified by mine. 00:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I am going to respect Clv's decision to block me and not unblock myself. I would like to say that I'm sorry that I broke this rule/policy that I did not know about. If I knew I would've not done so. 01:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Clv, once I was criticized about my opinion on whether you or Buck Nell would make a better admin. Now I will be unblocking Chiafriend as he posted only shortly after the rule was created. Perhaps he missed it, this shouldn't go on his record. If you, clv, were to make such an innocent mistake, would you deserve a 1 week ban? Of course you wouldn't, but does Chiafriend? No. Please, don't be Shadowdancer... 01:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Clv's nothing like Shadowmancer or whoever. If she was she'd be blocking us left and right, which she is not. 04:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

hmm
I think you're taking the new rule a little seriously. Actually, I don't think that rule belongs here anyway (running off to complain about it in a minute ^^). Think of how utterly boring the forums would be if we couldn't bring up anything besides runescape. I realize this wiki is for runescape, but it's got a community of friends on here. Something friends do is talk about, well, everything. Perhaps an "off topic" forum could be made for these things. But I'm not just here to talk solely about runescape. My offline supply of friends is limited, so it's nice to be able to talk about things besides runescape on here. I'm sure there are other people in my same predicament. This I know through talking to them about things other than runescape. Ojdude (gotta go rebuild my signature)

Main Page, interesting
I've noticed that you and a few users have been putting the "Main Page" or other funny headings on your User Pages. But why is the background behind the text white? It stands out... 14:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh... sorry I didn't think of that. My monobook settings are set to make the wiki look like the RuneScape main page. 15:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure, just on your own monobook found at User:Chiafriend12/Monobook.css. 23:30, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

*Sigh*
Yeah, I know. The 'block evasion' thing applies. On web cam, Tyler (Total Rune) slit his neck, I think. Here is the text.

---,---'{@ Gem's Princess @}'---,--- [ Got Caught Jerkin' It In My Room ] says:

Bye....*slices*

Meet me in the Mall, iz goin' down. (Throwin' up in my stuff. In my hood they call me BUCK.) (Not buck nell) says:

Bye'

Meet me in the Mall, iz goin' down. (Throwin' up in my stuff. In my hood they call me BUCK.) (Not buck nell) says:

...

---,---'{@ Gem's Princess @}'---,--- [ Got Caught Jerkin' It In My Room ] says:

my neck.... ---,---'{@ Gem's Princess @}'---,---  [ Got Caught Jerkin' It In My Room ] has stopped viewing webcam with you.


 * I suppose the Raven has fallen, but. He was his friend, wasn't he? Ah, a Living Legend. Lengends never die. Blanko, well. That's life. 98.193.51.199 00:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

um...
is this how i do it?

Re:Signature
Changing it won't do. The Simpsons Movie says "Pig crap", and my sig is supposed to be like the movie, so it wouldn't make sense if I took away the word "crap". It isn't offensive, and people use it all the time. I've seen some people *cough cough* Christine *cough* even drop the F bomb regularly. I don't see why I should change it if I've had it for this long and nobody has talked to me about it yet until now. 22:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

RE:QDB
Sorry, someone in the irc (I think either Tesfan or Icecube022) told me it was Halopedia. Although I like Uncyclopedia, and I have my own account there, I hope you understand why those quotes needed to be deleted. The length wasn't really an issue, it was just really off-topic and involved people most of us don't know at all. I'm glad that at least the other people were Uncyclopedians and not RSWiki users abusing their nicks. 03:00, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No players were abusing names, which is why I was glad. When I first saw the quote, I thought that a bunch of RSWiki users had changed their nicks, because I couldn't recognize any of the nicks besides yours. Thankfully they weren't RSWiki users, because if they were they would have been abusing their nicks and violating the chat policy, and if you had allowed RSWiki users to abuse their nicks, you wouldn't have been doing your job =P but there weren't any policies broken, except that it was from another wiki. Could you add a line saying "Don't add quotes from non-RSWiki members" to the QDB page? =P I'd do it but I'm lazy and I'm on DRSW... 03:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)