User talk:Soldier 1033

Leave a message &darr;

Hiya
http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv293/Man_tag1/pichu-4.gif 02:16, September 26, 2009 (UTC) Pwned i am taking over Powers! Lol

RE:Lulwut
School ruins my job on this wiki. Haven't posted in a newly archived talk in a while. Archive again! :D 02:59, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Ohai
Thank you Soldier! Much appreciated, I'll be sure to ask if I need anything :) -Jek Nexus, Quester and Skiller since June 2005 03:20, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

AAAAAAANDREW
I GOT YOU SOMETHING! http://i611.photobucket.com/albums/tt194/Gaylor_Lamont/furry16.jpg

THEY'RE SO HAPPY TO SEE YOUUUUUUU. 19:25, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

Why?
Why did you delete my userbox about the fmods?

I have been asked to become a fmod but sadly i cant post a screenshot because it is personal, I will post a screenshot of one of my posts if i become one to prove it. But for now can you please only undelete the invited fmod template and the category that goes with it. You can leave the other one's deleted until further notice.

Cheers,

16:26, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

Lol
Someone hates you 08:11, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * http://i693.photobucket.com/albums/vv293/Man_tag1/Lolsofunni.png >.> 03:48, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * I wanted to its funni so its file name is Lolsofunni.png   03:56, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

No need man
If you need me to accept your apology, then I do. And I apologize for being a bit short in a couple of my responses to you. But I am convinced you have nothing to apologize for. You were not rude, you did not insult me, there was no childish behavior. There is/was you with your beliefs, and me with mine. We're both doing what we think is best for this wiki. Sometimes, people disagree. No big deal Andrew, that's just how it goes. Your clear in my book.--Degenret01 13:53, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Adminship
Yea sure, why not? 04:03, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

Evil Yanks, AKA "that awesome one"
I am about to officially overtake you with the number of posts on the forums. I am about 5 off. I want you to hand over your "crown of awesomeness" and the "I <3 the Forums sceptre", so I can officially be titled "Evil Yanks, Master of the Official Forums" and people can look up to me and go "Woah! That guy is awesome! He must spend too much time on the forums". Then everyone will start chanting my name, and one of my legions of fans gives me a canoe as a present which has been signed by Genghis Khan himself! I will get into the canoe and sail off into the sunset, ending the fairytale story.

I realise that you don't really post on the forums and have become disenchanted with them, but I plan on milking this as much as possible. I wont be that offended if you just shrug me off and/or call me a noob. 08:17, October 2, 2009 (UTC)


 * You forgot one of the official rules. Only people who have posted on the Wiki in the last 3 months are eligble for the I <3 the Forums Sceptre. It has been much longer then that since Ranger last posted, so he does not count. I think that Dale Baxter would take the cake if it was out of everyone. 05:12, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Userpage
It's okay Andrew, Stelercus can change it. I don't people changing my page if it's productive. That's why I unprotected it. 00:04, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

User avatars
What do we do when someone uploads an inappropriate avatar? Like if someone uploaded a pornographic one or a swastika or Rosie O'Donnell's face or something? Report them at the CVU? 04:24, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I just wanted to know what should be done if someone DID do that. 04:32, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Champion
Champion is a verb, not a noun, lol. Remember...? 03:52, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Twigy tag1
I am sort of paranoid due to my rats dieing so what can i do now? 03:15, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Number one 03:27, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

OMG!
Boo Yeah! 04:31, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

:(
My Rollback failed :( Thanks to you :(

04:34, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

Lulz
Thank you for the message... that was, uh, kind of you. The plot was very detailed and very thick, took me like 5 hours to read the first half.-- 01:52, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

He, you'll be lucky to get 5 cents offa me Mister! I'm broke, and you know it *trains construction to get rid of 270K in bank* see, I'm poorest man in runescape. That'll be $5,000,000,000 for the time it took to type that many zero's. Good Day, Regards, Mr. 01:57, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about this, but it took all of 3 hours to read your last post! I was caught in a time warp just to have that much time between these posts... I charge 1 million dollars per minute I spent reading, coming out to a grand total of only 180,000,000 gold. I'm sure someone of ummm... your prowess in the art of Runescape could easily pay such a miniscule debt. Your Friend, thought you must heavily doubt the title "friend" after these miniscule fees I have thrust upon you, but fear not, this isn't the worst of what I have, sicerely, 02:03, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Template:ExcgDefault
It looks like Robert Horning accidentally removed a {} from around ItemId (here), turning it into a template. This is causing issues on all the GEMW pages. Could you add them back (change  to  ?) Thanks -- 16:34, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Re:CVU
I usually report a user if their edit contains more than one obscenity. Since his contained two, I felt it was report-worthy as most users making those kind of edits on their first edit arnt here to help -- 17:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * True, I'll hold off on my reports in the future. -- 17:07, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

RE: Help pl0x
I fixed the issue with the signature, it was an extra line break that was causing it. The edit report has also been fixed, and I'll take a look into the mass rollback script. I'm not surprised that the new masthead broke it  -- 04:03, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * The mass rollback should be fixed now, let me know if you still have any problems with it. -- 18:14, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Is the editreports thing still not working? I haven't been able to reproduce the problem since I made some changes a few days ago. -- 05:15, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Rofl
That is hilarious....wow...Quarenon has quite the program going on there ;) 19:11, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

Re:One star?
I know but youtube won't let you go any lower than one :( They could make a lot of money if the charged you to give negative ratings. Nothing would be as satisfying ^^ 02:37, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Speedy d tagging
I had a feeling I'd be notified about this. I apologize, I was wondering whether I should just add the tag or post on the talk page, but if I posted on the talk page, then no one would answer me (It always happens. Really. No one ever answers.), and I'd just be stuck looking at what I think to be a useless page. Up until now I didn't even know there was a place to nominate pages for deletion, thanks, I'll use that. But,

reading over the criteria for speedy deletion, I see nothing that explains "small articles" such as an article about small scenery (stool, door, fire remains). Let's say that a user is walking along RS one day and decides to help out the wiki by creating an article about a stool he sees. This is what he types:

"There are many stools in RuneScape. Stools cannot be sat on, and are only scenery. A few stools include the ones in Location A, Location B, and Location C. insert HD image of a stool here."

Now, this editor goes on to create five more articles about other very small and unnoticeable things, such as a large fern, a gate, and a crevice. They are all fashioned like the one I mentioned above,

(here's where my point comes in) Tell me, should I tag these with a speedy D, or should I nominate each of them for deletion? Articles on scenery surely don't deserve an article, (by this I mean non-interactive, one-option-which-is-examine, nothing-to-do-with-anything scenery, not trees or rocks.) What do I do with these useless articles? Who can benefit from "Stools can be found in Location A, however you can do absolutely nothing with them."? Let's say this player creates 25 articles on scenery, like I said before, do you expect me to nominate every single one of them for deletion, or maybe post on the talk page of each one? Please tell me, as I'm lost. I want your opinion, 22:47, October 27, 2009 (UTC)


 * Where in the policy does it say anything about scenery? So you're saying I should just ask Azaz? 01:31, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

File:Non Member skills.jpg
Aw, I was gonna torment him by leaving it because he seemed to want it deleted so bad  02:53, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Remember the good times
Good times ;)

Don't let it get to ya alright. 13:55, October 28, 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, maybe it's time someone did say something. In my opinion there are "elitist" things about you, which is your flaw. You still make a good friend, user, editor and admin. And this is just one point of many. Don't lay the blame on yourself, okay. Don't do it. 20:21, October 28, 2009 (UTC)


 * Andrew, please relax alright. This isn't about you. You should call me, we can talk about it, lol. Really, don't worry. It's something I've been leaning on for some time now anyways. It's not a personal attack on you at all so please don't take it as such. I can find other things that others have done that have contributed to my decision but I don't feel the need. I know you are mature enough to understand this. Maybe we should set up a Ventrilo time so we can talk about it a bit more...? Anyways dude, your my friend. Don't take this is a bad thing. Your pointing out flaws in Enigma, I'm pointing out flaws in you, and your pointing them out in me. We need to learn from each other, not regret each others actions cause we can't take them back. I'm sorry this has upset you. Let me tell you that I am extremely confident and happy with my choice, I wish you'd be happy with me. I'm sorry if I used your actions as an example but it was just there at the time. Don't take it to heart, alright :) 00:57, October 29, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Fansite support information sticky
I agree. Let's just leave it alone, they no matter what we do they won't do a thing. Patience is the only string of opportunity left for recognition. 04:44, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
 * No sarcasm intended. 06:21, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

That wasn't nice
I can't help it if someone wants to contradict their self.I can't help it if they want to be condescending either.I am not flaming and I take that to be slander and fighting words.Life's too short.LAUGH DAMN IT!Oh god thats not an octopus! 15:41, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Archive
Would you mine if I use a slightly changed version of this when I archive my talk? 21:18, October 31, 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks  21:25, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

FluffyBunnyBot
I recently noticed your "FluffyBunnyBot", could you please show me how to make a bot?
 * Ahh, thanks anyways. --Dosdummy

Wow!
How do you have so many archived talk pages? I haven't even archived once! You're popular. :D 10:55, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

RE:-ahem-
I am sorry, I was just trying to make things better by saying the question has been awnsered. As I have got all opposes, I think I should just be a rollback forever! Don't you think that is the right thing to do? (No, I am not being mean to myself.) Once again, I am very,very,very sorry!

17:07, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Well, I suppose I could atleast try but can you please get it in to everyone's minds (Not being rude) to not put the past into the present. I have changed, I don't ask like I did on the missouri wiki. 17:24, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Re:IP User Pages
Ok then! By the way, "deleted on sight" makes it sound much more dramatic than it is  22:51, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Attendance list
Did you realize that when you added yourself to the attendance list of my 99 Cooking party you also removed about five other signatures in the process? 07:10, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * I was assuming you might've accidentally hilighted (or would it be "highlighted"? Hmm. I'm not sure on its spelling.) other signatures when you added yours, but meh. It's all good in da' hood. 00:02, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Ahahaha etc
Tut tut. Very disappointing work. Anyone can copy and paste a series of @s. They could have done much better. 04:04, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is well over nine thousand. Its well over nine hundred thousand! 04:46, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: 75.22.102.34
He keeps making minor changes and undoing them. See here and here, here and here. -- 01:18, November 5, 2009 (UTC)