User talk:Joel amos

Joel amos * Guestbook * Talk page * http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/2037/userbox.pngUserboxes

'''Note: When I have a question, I ask a lot of people. So, if you're answering a question, check to see if there is already a discussion about it.'''

Re: Picture editing
Hi, Thanks for the offer :D Should I send you a link from photobucket? Or are you not allowed to do that? Or maybe via the runewiki?

18:31, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Uhm, which part's not allowed? 19:11, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah but, how? :/ if I can't do it from photobucket or the runewiki how else can I send it? 19:11, August 4, 2010 (UTC)]

Oh whoops, I thought you've been saying it's not allowed >.< Sorry about that. Anyways here's the link :) yuj2.png Thanks :) Oh and it might come up as the picture :/ Coz I uploaded it from the wiki 19:41, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Confuzzed
Nope, this is unrelated 19:44, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Picture editing
Thanks very much for the picture! I love it :D And also thanks for explaining how to remove the followed pages, looks much better now :) 15:09, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Talk page protecting
I'm trying to assume good faith here. Protecting was a needed step to prevent him from repeatedly making non-constructive edits to his talk page. I would prefer not to block him for repeated violations of RS:DDD - hence, the protection. I asked for a second opinion and another sysop agrees with me that it was justified. However, if there is some policy that I am not aware of, please let me know. 20:02, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, are you I be Opossum? You've made edits as if you were him/her. 20:37, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Backup img
I have seen the discussion you and Riblet have had about File:No Dungeoneering XP.png and I just want to say that you should always have an unmodified backup of your image uploads. It shouldn't be annotated. I still have all of my backups (around 3000+ of them). Just a friendly reminder for next time =) 15:32, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Adding links to categories
I was talk page stalking and I saw you asking how to add links to categories. I'm fairly certain it is done by typing: Category:Images needing transparency I added the link to the template you referred to. 18:29, August 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah lol I typed the above before I read your comment on my talk.  18:30, August 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Gf  18:31, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Gah, you edit conflicted me twice trying to answer him . And then I accidentally clicked on my browser's panic button and lost all my tabs. Edit: You also edit conflicted me posting this

Re: GIF Deletion
Oh, sorry. It was marked for speedy deletion and, at the time, did not have any links. I will not delete it, and if it is marked again, I'll nominate it for RfD instead. 02:16, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * The GIF in question was deleted. There's never any reason to animate images in this fashion. If you see an image like that, please mark it for speedy deletion or, if we don't have any separate images for it, add  to the image. Thanks,  03:22, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please stop re-uploading the boater image, it serves no useful function on the wiki. It is nothing but the inventory sprites stripped of their black outline and animated in such a way that you can't get a clear look at any of them, except by looking slightly to the right, where all 5 images are already clearly on display. 05:05, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you keep uploading that image I am not going to have any choice but to block you. 05:21, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Random Question
I've seen that before from private server images, but I can't say for sure. The guy on the left is wearing the Investigator's outfit. The other one, I'm not sure, his clothing seems to resemble a Helmet of trials... --Coolnesse 13:46, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's his base clothing. There's a huge amount of new styles now. You may have missed the update. 21:21, August 31, 2010 (UTC)


 * http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/4750/blueoutfit.png
 * http://a.imageshack.us/img266/7468/joelisanoob.png
 * http://a.imageshack.us/img256/3092/joelisafool.png
 * }
 * Its the Missionary Tunic and Ceremonial Robe Bottom base clothes. 02:35, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, equipment has always been about stats, not looks. But if you're talking about 0-stat items like Elegant clothing, I still think its a step in the right direction. What Jagex has to do now is make other pieces of equipment as numerous and customizable as the base clothing, or else you're right, people will spend all their time making outfits with base clothing instead of existing equipment. 17:52, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Blue robes
I'm not sure, at first I thought that they were vestment robes, but none have that color scheme. It looks a bit strange as it's all one color, possibly a faked image. Best to ask someone else to see if they know. 00:45, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Definietly not faked. I took the screenshot =) I couldn't get a response when i asked them because they were a bot. 00:47, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

It's basically like a blue robe with yellow pixels scribbled on it. 00:48, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Blue outfit
I have no idea. Sorry. 01:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Files
Don't just move a JPEG to a PNG. It doesn't make the quality any better, when the PNG version still has compression artifacts. Thanks. 19:30, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice any change in the quality and I believe you said you moved it? 19:22, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

blur is not aa. -- 20:19, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

Ehm, we can.
1. The event is over. 2. Soften is blur. 3. -- 00:19, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

If you want to add anti-aliased transparency, try using this method. Anti-aliased transparency on an image that does not originally have anti-aliasing on usually ends up looking bad. 03:13, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

* talk page stalk* Anti-aliasing is basically a thing where the edges of things are blurred to make them look smoother and better. On RuneScape, anti-aliasing can be found in the options and you can choose from: None, 2x, 4x

Some graphics cards are not good enough to support anti-aliasing.

What Riblet means is, if you add anti-aliased transparency on images that are not anti-aliased, it looks pretty bad. There are other methods available to add transparency to images that do not have anti-aliasing. Thanks, 19:23, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

I had noticed that you tried to anti-alias this file, but the method you used caused it to look very blurry. The second part didn't really relate to this image because the original was anti-aliased, it was just information. 20:33, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Random skill
Sorry, I have no idea. All I did was replace some images. I don't know the mechanism used to implement them, though it could have something to do with the AJAX used in various pages. 02:19, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

where
where are you going to use this? If you are not going to use it on an article page, please upload it to an image host site instead, per RS:NOT. Thanks. 21:56, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * I ask because it looks like a file without any use on this wiki. 22:01, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * I heard they are yelling "Lets fuck revenants". I don't really think that fits here. 22:33, January 29, 2011 (UTC)