User talk:Suppa chuppa

Archive!
You're past 100 now. 21:45, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yay I'm first@@@@@ 03:26, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * You're up and about already? Just how much sleep did you get last night? O_o 14:38, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6 hours. 14:40, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. I woke up this morning to "71 alerts" on Skype... apparently some people had a long conversation in the wiki's skype channel. I remember seeing your name thrown around at like 5:30 AM. 14:43, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * That time stamp was either incorrect or you're remembering it incorrectly. I slept at 2. 14:45, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * So late. Wow. And I suppose the timestamp may be in GMT. How on earth do you survive on so little sleep? 14:50, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

recent revert
http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=Money_making_guide%2FMiscellaneous_and_Merchanting_%28P2P%29&action=historysubmit&diff=4855925&oldid=4855924 whilst he did almost blank the page, i do believe the edit was in good faith, and prehaps could be added in the right way. fell free to tell me if i am completely wrong however

RuneScape Wiki, Y U NO WORK 23:57, October 18, 2011 (UTC)

okay changing it to hi is obviously not in good faith lol, and i thought he had added something at the time, but checking u are right he clearly didnt lol. RuneScape Wiki, Y U NO WORK 00:08, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re:The shadow rising
yeah, I just started The Wheel of Time series about a week ago. :D -- 14:30, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * probably. I don't think it'll take me until March of next year to finish up to 13. -- 14:52, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

The NL Clans
Wtf is wrong with you.. why are you deleting our post all the time...

RE: RE: Trivia
What the heck bro, you removed my trivia. Dodgercp 20:36, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh nevermind, I guess it doesn't really matter :p.Dodgercp 02:36, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Nerd
What is up with your signature <.< 17:14, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * ya wtfman. 19:17, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

I just wouldn't. 20:55, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you go to my wiki and tell me why my signature isn't working. -.- It doesn't look like it'll work on the community council wiki either. Do you have to have the subst/nosubst code templated on each wiki for it to work or something? 07:09, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature . Can I just take the nosubst part out? <.< 16:56, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay well I can't go making templates on every wiki just for my signature.. 17:00, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Tell. I tried just using w:c:etc but it didn't work. 17:08, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

This screwed up the nav bar. Every one of the first level 3 headers now has Disclaimer and About us. 17:32, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yey! I noticed that about the gaming calendar too. Stoopid random wikia updates. We don't have game updates like that, why should they force it on us ): 17:45, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

You nu fix my signature. </3 I has a request though. Can we make an abuse filter which warns/tags/does something to people who replace the word "first" with "second" in the mainspace? I'm really really tired of undoing these edits for the British floor numbering system. 18:42, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. <3 19:05, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Fais palm. 21:33, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yey!!! 21:43, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * This made the undo floaty message thingy really long to where you can't see all of it unless you click it. 18:48, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Suppy Chippy. 19:47, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Can you think of any reason why people would need to add their signature and/or userpage link in the mainspace? If not, can we fix filter 16 to disallow? 17:08, November 18, 2011 (UTC)

Dummy. I was going to delete that as it didn't require a merge D: 21:42, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'M STILL NOT GETTING A NEW MESSAGES BUBBLWEOIFJWEIUFJ 21:44, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * No. Waiting a few days for them to refresh the special pages for the last request I sent. So if that doesn't work I can send 2 errors in 1 message. I so smawt. 21:48, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

From here on down it's utter madness... 16:56, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lul. 13:50, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

A known bug apparently. ): 17:35, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * And wikia wonders why we don't like article comments/message wall. LOOK AT OUR DELETION LOG, THAT'S WHY. -.- Can you come onto the chat? (: 17:38, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Cape of Legends Edit
Not a rant. Please be a responsible admin and read before you make a snap judgement.

There's a reason someone made that original post two years ago; why it's a big deal in the first place.

The record stood for so long because simply having a combat level below level 50 is next to impossible for the completion of that quest. Don't misunderstand, combat difficulty has nothing to do with it. The problem lies with the pre-requisites. To explain:

Family Crest has a magic req of 59. The highest boost that can be achieved, at lower levels, is with the Vecna skull (+6). Making the effective required Magic level for starting Legends: 53.

If you add up all the unavoidable exp rewards from all the pre-requisite quests you will have these levels:

Str: 39 Att: 32 Def: 34 Con: 16 Range: 13

With these stats, including Magic: 53, the lowest possible combat level you could have, to start Legends, is 38.

That is assuming: You never perform any combat, you never gain any Constitution experience, you have﻿ a Prayer and Summoning level of 1, and that there are no level requirements of any kind for Legends itself... .

The actual minimum combat levels for Legends are:

Magic: 56 (As previously stated﻿ the actual lowest this could be is 53)

Prayer: 42 (With the quest "As a first resort..." - Which rewards NO combat exp - the sulfur spring gives a boost of approximately 10%. The guide says 10%, but that isn't the exact math. A Prayer Level of 37 will boost to 42)

Strength: 50 (With a Super Strength potion this can be boosted from 40)

Adding in a prayer level of 37 changes the actual lowest possible starting combat level to: 42

This is still assuming:

You've gained NO constitution experience.

You've never fought 1 single monster.

Since combat level is determined, in part, by﻿ Str + Att OR Range OR Magic you could theoretically: Alternate experience between Att and Range and thereby not increase that portion of combat level formula any further. As long as their exp stays lower than Magic you're good.

However even in this almost impossible scenario you can not avoid some constitution experience.

The constitution reward for fighting just the required boss fights in all the quests is﻿ 1608. This will raise your Con to: 20

Your combat level now: 43

This still assumes:

1.) Every other quest you do for the Legends quest point req (108) has NO COMBAT and NO COMBAT EXP Reward.

2.) You fight NO Monsters in the Legends' Quest itself.

Just the REQUIRED fights in Legends - If you take the "Long Path" which is LESS fighting - give you 1090 constitution experience.

Which now gives you Con: 22

Which makes your final, only theoretically possible, absolute minimum combat level to put on the "Cape of Legends": 44

Which even﻿ then still assumes 1 fact:

You never fought any other monsters - just the bosses. If you wind up doing even a small amount of fighting anywhere, you will gain more constitution exp.

So there it is: 44

That is the lowest combat level someone could ever possibly be, without cheating, and wear a "Cape of Legends".

So forget long. Forget high skill reqs. Forget the fights, the challenges, and anything else you think about Legends. Do see how almost impossibly hard it is to simply "be" below level 50?

That's why the original comment was added 2 years ago. That's why it's relevant. Beating that record was actually quite a long time in planning.

And now personally... Does someone who wipes out all the trivia in a section, just because they feel like it, really deserve to be an admin for a peer edited publication?

I'm not positive.. but it seems unlikely that you're the sole decider of what is relevant and what is not. If something has been relevant for 2 years it does not become irrelevant simply because it isn't important to you.

Servers
''' Updating Thread: Server(s). ''' (If you saw a Edit for this sorry, I was adding this title so it didnt blend with other messages and looked confusing.

Er, I made an update on a thread about "Server(s)", not sure anymore, anyways... I editted the thread showing why on August 29th, 2011, why more then 20 World Servers went down, and you posted a message me saying don't post unless I cannot verify. I can send you a Screenie of the DDoS that I, Javac performed, with LetsPk, and also, we had a bit of ShellScripting Code with Python, if you do not believe me, I'd be glad too send you the Source Files, ALONG with a Screenshot of a J-Mod confirming that it was us, and more details if I must, I was only editting the Article too replace the "un-explained reason" with the real one.

How it Started:

Me and my friend "LetsPk" we're accused of using third-party-software that JaGex actually accused us of making the Software ourselves, and they permenantly banned both of our Accounts. In return too show that we could do way better then what they we're even trying too accuse us of, we created a ShellCode Script along with a Python Script, (very little Java was used as well.), and we had it flood all of the mentioned Servers, honestly we had no idea which Server was which, so I cannot really specifically state which worlds; after we had stopped the DDoS in about a 4-7 hour time frame after we launched it, we openly confessed too Jagex that it was us and we we're wrong for doing it, but it was'nt right of them too Ban us without even proof that we we're using such Third-Party-Software. Ofcourse, it took them about 8-9 days too reply, and it didn't even seem like it was them, as if it was automated, in that case Jagex should be banned for using auto-software (botting) (this was a joke about Jagex botting.).

Anyways, I was on Facebook talking too friends while I was typing this, so, if any other information is needed for me too validate the post that I edited on the thread and for it too stay there; please email me at jaykayyz@hotmail.com, or, just pm me on here I'll try too update these forums as I dump RuneScape's cache a lot, I could provide future updates for Admins only? I don't know...
 * gf 20:49, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Deathcon II
Why did you undo my edit? Those were the examine info for the statues.

lolol 20:41, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * [ some good advice for u bro.] 05:18, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * lolol 05:40, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Cockroach Soldier
Hey thanks for telling me about the gems, but i knew they were there, thought it would be better if the player knew they can get them without using the rare table drops.

Nay :)

Signature
Hey, i tried making this signiture  Medabee but i can't seem to get the link to my userpage, could you help with this? if this was the wrong place to ask this question, sorry. :(     I 8ED UR M0M - Medabee247 00:46, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

The signiture ^^^
>.<, i forgot to do "Headling 2" on my signiture thing, sorry. I 8ED UR M0M - Medabee247 00:48, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Strange face
stop deleting my edits on the strange face it looks so much like a dwarf its not funny and we all know that dwarves cant use magic without a mutation and as his brother was the inventor of powefull magic that makes ne sence

Silly jester top
Defense is spelled defense more commonly than defence

God books
I would just like to say that I have been trying to modify the article "Guthix's book of balance"/"Saradomin's holy book"/"Zamorak's unholy book" so that it is titled "Book of balance"/"Unholy book"/"Holy book" as the previously mentioned title would cause some players to believe that it was once owned by Guthix/Zamorak/Saradomin. And you have been "Fixing" my edits(on Guthix's Book of balance) which I believe are legitimate edits contributing to the wiki's valuable pool of knowledge.(Sorry if I am posting this in the wrong place but I am new to editing the wiki and don't know where this should go.)

Trolls that like books
Why god books, of all things? I'll never understand these... things. 03:25, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

God books 2
its not "bandos' book of war" "armadyl's book of law" "guthix's book of balance" "saradomin's holy book" or "zamorak's unholy book" its book of war, book of law, book of balance, holy book, and unholy book,
 * In case you don't get a notification, I replied to you here. 03:32, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Abyssal whip cleanup template
I notice you re-added the cleanup template on Abyssal whip. Can you clarify how it could be cleaned, then, because it looks better than our average page, I'd say. The reason on the template states bullet lists make the page messy, but there's relatively few bullet list (percentage wise, less than half, which is a heck of a lot more than can be said about many other pages). As well, I couldn't immediately find any major issues in the training section. Care to elaborate? 03:46, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

New section magic word thingy
I can't seem to get it to work on my talk page...? After archiving my talk page, for some reason, Wikia refuses to let my talk page have the "Leave message" (new section) default for the edit button, even if I manually try and add the magic word. Even the archive nicely shows the right type of edit button... Did I do something wrong? 04:19, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Javascript Errors
Hey there!

We're seeing a lot of JavaScript errors on your wiki, coming from this page.

Could you please investigate and try to fix those? They seem to be caused by your assumption that a success always gets you all the data you're trying to use. Here are the errors:

Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property '0' of undefined (line 28)

and

response.query.pageids is undefined (line 28)

Let me know if you need our help with fixing this.

Thanks! TOR 13:18, November 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * I believe we're good now. Thanks for the explanation. 87.96.117.229 21:15, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Fight caves
dude,wtf?! I put something on the fightcaves and you took it off! you're a big friken, ****

Diff+
The diff+ button on the RCH Lite is kind of buggy. When I click the X at the top right to close it it nu close. ): 01:54, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah I noticed but I was like meh whatever. Oh - work in progress, okay. (: 03:28, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * In addition to my requested abuse filters and signature right <3 03:36, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand the syntax so please fix the filter. ^-^ 22:43, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ohhai. 22:45, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I need help, join chat <3 01:34, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Holy cithara
Thanks. I just ended up re-doing the edits. Check out the page for me when I'm done, please? I'm new at this.

One quick look at my chart, please? Then I'm done with edits for today - testing is a lot of work :P

Oh, much better! Thanks!

David jones
why did you delete david jones?

hes a character from the new quest :P

Cleanup tags
If you're going to add a cleanup tag, couldn't you please use a better description than "needs help"? Obviously it will need help, if the cleanup tag is there, but if you don't state how it needs help or how it can be improved, that doesn't help anyone. Sure, you might get back to the page later (I've used the cleanup tags in the past as a means of tagging a page for myself, so I could improve it later when I get time, as I've come to learn rather few editors care about cleanup), but for others who would be happy to help fix the page's issues, it doesn't help us much.

And of course, most pages could be improved in some way or another, even if others overlook it (for example, Special:Random took me to Monster_vs._Monster_combat, which could probably be has some incorrect case, mentions the gnomecopters within the main body, despite their long-since removal, mentions revenants as though they still existed in the main wilderness, has the FTW template still up (well deserved), and is only linked from the see also section of monster.

As well, I've removed many cleanup templates in the past simply because they did not specify a reason and I could not find one. Perhaps the issue was already fixed, or perhaps it will go unnoticed forever since the tagger failed to mention what the issue was.

Of course, I could press random page and probably every result could be improved in some way, if I read through the page carefully, though the Cleanup template should be helping me in doing so; after all, it's easy to find a page that could use cleanup/expansion/etc, but can take more time to find how it could be improved, especially on long pages. Thus, could you please try and use more descriptive reason tags on maintenance templates, so our time is spent improving the article, not trying to find what is wrong with the page. Thanks. 23:23, November 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * *Reads what he typed before* ... ... What the - ? 23:27, November 10, 2011 (UTC)

This one too
Revdelete this one too. Smithing (talk | contribs) 01:51, November 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * K, cool. Smithing (talk | contribs) 01:53, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Poke
So, I see you finally decided to exercise your unilateral rights to vandalize my page. 06:55, November 11, 2011 (UTC)

Specific pages
Hi umm why did you blank (well, not blank but you know what I mean) the trimmed and gold-trimmed armour pages? Isn't it better to have a page specifically on the types of armour (remember, this is like the first edition, stubs get expanded over time) than just one general page? If there's a very important point I'm missing here (which does happen quite a lot), please tell me and feel free to call me stupid 15:34, November 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Aright IC

still, in the future there may be specific information on each armour set 15:40, November 12, 2011 (UTC)

re...
17:16, November 12, 2011 (UTC)hi.
 * 17:18, November 12, 2011 (UTC) nm, you?
 * lolol homework. 17:19, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * u must be a studious man. 17:19, November 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17:20, November 12, 2011 (UTC)lolo

Tgj
There was no need to use the phrase "retarded crap" on Tgj's talk page. I am aware of what they tried to do but that is no reason for breaching RS:UTP. I suggest you reread the policy and try and avoid that sort of language use in future 20:59, November 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Regardless of whether you were talking about them or their actions, you still made an implication that they are retarded. Also, you claim that it had nothing to do with UTP, but how exactly is telling somebody that you consider their actions to be "retarded crap" not disrespectful?  21:10, November 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Crap, not retarded. That was unnecessary and could offend others. 21:19, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. 21:21, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh move on, people, we all know Suppa wouldn't intentionally offend other users. 21:38, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

I SUGGEST YOU READ THE POLICIES MR. ADMIN. 76.31.28.85 21:55, November 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * I suggest you begone Mr. Anon. 22:02, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not a mister, fool. 76.31.28.85 03:53, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

@Suppa - cause it giv me the gigglies ^-^ 76.31.28.85 04:01, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, my mom took my computer away, lol. 76.31.28.85 04:02, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * She teh laem. She wanted me to go get her pills at CVS simply because she didn't want to go herself/was too lazy. When was the last time she went somewhere after I asked? Yeah, no. But I still went and when I got home it was gone lul. 76.31.28.85 04:09, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I did and she said no, so I was like whatever and walked away. Asked again tonight and she's like "Well you were rude last time you asked.. We'll discuss it tomorrow". ?!?!?? Gawd it's her fault this time. -.- Pathetic. 76.31.28.85 04:13, November 14, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, after friggin 5 days. 21:14, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Delete reason
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!! Seriously, I don't see the similarity with that other image, different angle, you can see the statue, etc. But the graves look a lot nicer in that other one, so I'd rather keep that one instead of this one. Maybe a merge would have been better though? 17:29, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I mainly did it 'cause I don't like deleting stuff and I imagine the pre-HD image would have had some value in GU after the Wildy graphical update. The graves looked different back then. It also showed the obelisk, which was nice. In fact, I might go for a wildy trip to capture all the obelisk location in their environments. =) 17:32, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd say Fairy Tale Three, but you'd remove all the galleries. =) Icthlarin's Little Helper need work, especially describing the dialogue. Smoking Kills needs even more work. Also, perhaps you might want to remove he bullet points from Rocking Out. The rest of the article is OK. And While Guthix Sleeps needs a huge rewrite, of course... =P Well, that's a small part just to get some ideas. I may do parts of WGS as well. 17:40, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * I posted that on my own talk... fail. Also, it's Mark's birthday. =) I gave him a ghast pie. 17:40, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Great. 17:46, November 15, 2011 (UTC)



My temp
Aww man you ruined my ossum welcome template... 18:38, November 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * stupid ghast pic :) 18:43, November 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * On a serious note though - you know how you blocked this guy the other day? Well I know him irl and he said he didn't mean it etc and so what if he writes penises on my welcome template (I'm being contradictory here :))? I know that you actually banned him for this, but I told him about that later on (check his talk page); he just didn't know. So my question is, how long is he banned for? 18:54, November 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually Suppa didn't block him, his block log is empty 18:57, November 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * Really he told me he's blocked... Might have to double check that then... 20:20, November 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * Aright then

Just one more thing though. You know my newmessages thing that I stole from joeytje50? Would it be against any rule if I made it link here? 07:39, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:
Thanks :)! Mark  ( talk ) 19:21, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

Melina.png
Hi there,

I uploaded a newer version where I removed some green around the more white edges. There is still a lot of green around the other edges, but from the original image it is almost impossible to remove the background (the background is basically the same colour as the model), let alone green around the edges. Therefor I need to the edges by hand, making the green more transparant and hoping I don't damage the model itself. I hope it's good this way. Sumurai8 00:13, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

RWT Picture
Hi there, I'd just like to know why you removed my picture on the article for Real World Trading. :P Thanks,

~Fireful

why did you my cyclops edit?

Lol, sorry about that, new to Wikia, wanted to see if it'd actually show up, or just be sided to that only I would see it.

Truely sorry, will NOT happen again - P.S I love what you've created.

having alot of problems with mine lmao, any idea of where i can find a tutorial to set out my home page like yours? e.g categories, FAQ's, ..?

SkullatorRS2006 01:37, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Skullator

Thanks man your ever so helpful..>.< and now I feel like a total idiot for stupidly messing with your page. Thanks man!!

This page is ever so helpful, yet a little baffling to me :>/ - Is there a simple way of just setting out my page like :

What is example Wiki?:

TEXT BOX

Categories:

EXAMPLE

EXAMPLE

EXAMPLE

and once a user has clicked on a category, it'll lead them to a page full of pages, for example:

You are in category: Armour

Dragon armour

rune armour

bronze armour

SkullatorRS2006 01:48, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Skullator

Like i'll sel it pout in rs form

What is RS2006 Wiki?:

RS2006 wiki is a guide for people who play rs2006                                                                                                        _______________________________________________________________________________________________

Categories:                                                                                                                                                     _______________________________________________________________________________________________* Skills


 * Armour


 * Quests


 * Dragons


 * Minigames

_______________________________________________________________________________________________And inside each of those categories, would be seperate pages for each armour type, minigame, each quest, each skill etc.

That's how i'd like my page to be setout. I'm trying really hard to participate in the construction of a 2006 RuneScape remake.

Please and thankyou

SkullatorRS2006 01:54, November 27, 2011 (UTC) Skullator

Awesome for that old 2006 mainpage source code, where would I now paste this?

Thanks alot by the way.

Man i don't think i can thank you enough! Wow.

Thank you x 1,400,000 >.^

Just one last thing buddy - How'd i go about adding the background, like your one is the RS2 Map?

<3

Where would I post this code to be my permanant background?

Thanks alot man you've made my page 110% better.

Thanks man, what type of code do i use for my images from imageshack? direct link? widget code? forum code? etc.

Thanks

Quad
Why did you quote me?

RE:
can you give me jagex mail?

LMFAO
03:57 	(User rights log). . Suppa chuppa (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Suppa chuppa from Check users, deleterevision and Administrators to Check users and deleterevision

http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karlis&diff=next&oldid=4983332 -- 04:06, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * https://twitter.com/DiRizz/status/141379549349937153 lol -- 03:16, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Hi
Yo. 06:10, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nm. You? 06:12, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same. 06:14, November 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Ramokee Skinweaver
Its quite hard to see what they are sitting on ( probably my problem ). Instead I did see this image on the page, which I added trans to, which could be a possible replacement.

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/2624/ramokeeskinweavercopy.png

Any thoughts?

Baitercell Talk 22:37, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

RE:RE:New Messages Bubble
I know, but she was having problems with them and was wondering if that was fixed now, cause if so then the fix might have caused the new problem. Otherwise it would have been a separate problem. 00:18, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

TESTING
amg it works 06:19, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Zpam
Lol how did your UP get vandalised 4 times? 08:07, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * But now on a more serious note - I've seen that custodians can move stuff and suppress the creation of redirects. But why would you want to suppress a redirect? 08:33, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
For fixing RuneScape clock. I don’t know where the formatting mess come from…--Void Knight 07:02, December 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Log update
No problem. :P It was mostly just a lot of find and replace. :P 17:56, December 3, 2011 (UTC)

???
http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?diff=5013172 http://runescape.wikia.com/index.php?diff=5013185 ??????? 22:22, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-wSyBqSKY4 00:04, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * wat? 06:53, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * HOW COULD YOU WATCH THAT?! 16:01, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't, I closed the tab after the first second >.> 16:28, December 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * trolol. 19:54, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Your RC hybrid
is awesome. However, could you make it so that GEDB edits don't come up in the left-hand side table, because they have a table all for themselves on the right? Otherwise, It's really good and thanks for this tool. 15:59, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Do I need to import any more js? 16:46, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * AMG 3 pages to go!!! 17:19, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Cheats and scams
The reason I copypasted was because there already was a page called scams, which was a redirect to cheats and scams, which didn't allow me to simply move the page. 07:25, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

It's not "tricking" Runescape. They actually encouraged people to change browsers for the goggles and they were free to convert back if they didnt like chrome.

Quick smash
According to Cook Me Plox, names for Special attacks are supposed to redirect to the weapon, e.g. Puncture. Not sure if that's also the case for that particular special attack though, seeing that two weapons have the same one...--Void Knight 11:30, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

Up already?
16:59, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Because I went to bed before you did last night, and if left to my own devices I can go until 3 pm. (By the way, today's physics lecture was a complete joke... I definitely should have skipped it... then I could have gotten up at 12:30 for pistol.... or since we're not shooting guns in pistol today (silly "health" requirement means we'll be talking about artificial sweeteners) I could have skipped that too and gotten up at 1:30... and then since my math recitation is useless I could have skipped taht too and gotten up at 2:30.... and since politics is canceled, I will skip that... and get up at 5:30..... and since dinner is so useless I could skip that too and not get up at all!) 17:02, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see. Good luck! 17:08, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

Look at the RfA page history
You'll notice that I moved the table back to the bottom on August 16 and clearly stated my reason. Someone that's brand new to the wiki is less likely to immediately nominate themselves if they actually have to scroll to the bottom first, because it increases there chances of reading about the process and understanding that they might not be ready yet. I'm really not interested in getting myself into an edit war, but you've yet to provide any legitimate reasons for undoing the edits made by both myself and Liquid. If you have a legitimate reason for it being at the top (besides "it's easier to get to it," because please, it takes a second to scroll down), I'd very much love to hear them. Thanks, 06:54, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That's all I was looking for. I don't think either of us are interested in fighting over a silly table so I see no reason to pursue this any further, except that my OCD is killing me every time I look at that page >_> lol. 00:43, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Cyclops edit
Hey Suppa, could you please change the drop table for cyclops in the seed drops back to 4 magic seeds, because earlier i was killing cyclops and i got a drop of 4 magic seeds, worth 1m. so i dont see why you removed it
 * Hey there. I responded to you on your talk page, but I guess you didn't get a notification about it. Anyway, I'll copy and paste it here. That drop is on the rare drop table. You don't need a ring of wealth to get it, and the ring of wealth doesn't need to be activated to get it because you still have a chance of getting rare drop table drops without one. Because there are a lot of monsters that give access to the rare drop table and there are a lot of different drops in the rare drop table, we put all of these drops in a collapsible table towards the bottom of the drop sections. Hope this explains it. 04:06, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Happy holidays
  Happy Christmas, ! All the best, and a happy new year.

HM
YOU ARE A SEXY MAN -- 04:23, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

What does this have to do with anything? --Void Knight 14:14, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * wth -- 05:29, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * who knows 05:31, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Speedy deletion
Alrighty. Next time, I'll say:. Uhm, really now, better to have an actual reason than just 'unnecessary'. :) 07:46, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well then: 07:48, December 17, 2011 (UTC)




 * Good, I made you laugh.  07:51, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Comment on Zamorak's RfB
Hello. While I don't deny that changing the perception of bureaucrats in terms of making them more "down-to-earth" and accessible to the rest of the community may be beneficial to the Wiki, I still stand by my belief that bureaucrats should avoid being overly active in the Wiki. I've already posted the reasoning on the RfB itself, so I won't reiterate it here. I am generally of the opinion that if a user has a genuine need for the tools, the quasi-votes in the RfA should be adequate in showing it as such. Thus, this sort of firsthand knowledge of how much a nominee might need the tools, while it may/may not be useful, it may not be as necessary as one may think. I am in agreement with you however that there is a fine line that bureaucrats must tread. Too active is a problem (imo), and too inactive is undoubtedly a problem as well, one that I admit that our bureaucrats might be facing. But my point is simply that in the attempt to change the perception of bureaucrats in the community, one should keep in mind that being too active can be counterproductive to the role of the bureaucrat.

Next, while I initially questioned whether my comment should be an oppose or a comment, I realised that it doesn't matter so much to me as to whether Zamorak becomes a bureaucrat or not, but what matters more is the circumstances in which he becomes a bureaucrat, i.e. the standards that the community is holding bureaucrats to in this RfB. Hence, I decided to label what I wrote as a comment. The reason why I saw a need to post what I wrote is because it seemed to me that the community may not have fully considered the assumption that a highly active bureaucrat is a good thing (as well as the other arguments in the RfB that I felt were misconceptualising the role of the bureaucrat), hence I decided to post my view on the situation to spark further discussion regarding this. I don't mind if you attack my position, because to me, it would be even better if you were to post your views on the discussion as well. A well-reasoned debate is more beneficial to the Wiki than the semi-bickering that seemed to be going on thus far.

Accusing me of deliberately disguising my "oppose" as a comment is in bad faith and unacceptable. Furthermore, it makes little or no difference to the process of consensus, seeing as my points will still be taken into account during the closure, regardless of whether I decide to label it as an oppose or a comment. It's not gaming the system in any way, and does not change anything to my advantage/purposes, so I fail to see where your concerns lie. Finally, as I have told others, I would actually have preferred some better medium to post my views (e.g. a Defining Bureaucrats project) but I felt it was sufficiently relevant to the RfB discussion, hence I posted it there anyway. I don't see it as your place to judge whether I should be allowed to post my view on this subject when it's relevant to the discussion at hand. However, I do thank you for being forthcoming in your opinions and sharing them with me. Cheers. 13:30, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

I hope neither of you mind...but what a long-winded fellow.

Can't resist. --Void Knight 14:13, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Mobile site javascript block?
Hi, you seem to know a bit on javascript, so I thought i'd ask you if you know of a code that i could use to block the mobile wikia site. I tried looking for one online... but cant find one. any help would be appreciated.

Thanks 04:01, December 19, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok sounds good. Thanks again 04:14, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Checkuser query
I see you checkuser'ed 'SuckMyHairyA$hole' earlier today. Based off events earlier today in Chat, I strongly suspect that that user is the same person as AmpXephos. Would you be able to confirm this for me? Thanks. 05:23, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * lool -- 05:26, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * >_> If they are the same person, I need to lengthen their ban from chat. 05:32, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * They ban evaded three times and only got their ban extended 3 days as a result, but meh. Also, while we're on the subject, could you perm ban AmpXeephos? For some reason Liquid blocked it for a week for being a sock. I don't get that logic.  05:40, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Abusefilter request
I got another abusefilter request for you: this edit got through, because the abusefilter isn't designed for commas. I made a regex (just put it after a | in the current regex) that would match those submissions too: here. If you want, you can test it a bit more and change it to work better. 15:28, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

The woes of editing on a touch screen
Yeah, sorry about that. I hadn't even realised I had done that until I saw my name on the rc under farming and I was like "Why is my name on the RC under farming? I didn't edit that!". I must have misclicked the rollback link or something and didn't notice? Would be pretty easy to do on a touch screen. 21:59, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Have a nice holiday :)
Make sure to send me a postcard. 22:26, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

locks change
A little effort can go a long way to providing you with great peace of mind. , changing a lock is a fairly simple task to do and it only takes a few times. replacing your lock with another of the same brand is keeps more safe. 06:42, December 20, 2011 (UTC)

Abuse filter
How was this not caught? I checked the filter and it should have worked.. 18:01, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ty (: Can't think of any - are you back now? 05:32, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah. Yeah I understand, the past 2 weeks or so have been absolute torture. Christmas plans were cancelled and we put my dog down this morning. ): So now I'm just sitting here. 05:37, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I was kind of looking forward to it, we were going to go hiking and sledding and play in the snow and stuff. But then my dog started getting really sick so we cancelled.. 05:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope so. You have a good Christmas too (: 05:43, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

How come this edit was allowed? Jews is in the standalone section.. 18:48, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol, nevermind. 18:50, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Wait how could I just say it then? 18:52, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

How possible would it be to create an abuse filter for PDDA articles?
I'm curious. 06:34, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, we'd have to have some sort of standard for the article names/content and all of them are different. <.< 06:45, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't think so.  06:51, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * On Christmas Eve there was an IP who kept making and or recreating player articles and didn't stop until he was blocked. I just thought it would be handy to have the abuse filter warn, or in more blatant cases disallow. 10:30, December 26, 2011 (UTC)

End of the year...?
Hi there. This message has been copypasted on several other users' talk pages, so please do not be surprised if you see it somewhere else. I'm doing an end of year slideshow-video-thing based on the one the Pirates of the Caribbean wiki made, and as if possible I would like you to share any highlights of the year, funny moments that you haven't forgotten (they had to happen this year), and a paragraph about how you feel the year went, in a sort of "looking back" style. If you do not want to participate in this for any reason, it is completely your choice and I am in no way pressing you to do this. If you have any suggestions or concerns about this, please do not hesitate to post them on my talk page in the form of a reply. 09:13, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

Do you know what's awkward?
When I tell people to stop or they'll get a block and then you block them. 05:59, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

From now on, I'll just pester everyone's talk page until people start leaving descriptive reasons in the cleanup template...
Hi, in this edit of Tutorials (historical), you added the cleanup template with the reasoning "better wording". Care to elaborate? Thanks, 08:09, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

y u no
y u no on IRC anymore when I'm on :< 17:03, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * [18:07:37] * Joeytje50 slaps suppa around a bit with a large trout 17:08, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Your revert of the water detail comparison.
Why did you revert it to the horrid overhead angle? You cannot see glitched DirectX shore properly, which is biased considering the discussion going on to determine which graphics mode to use in images, especially considering that most images will NOT be using an overhead view. You cannot see the bottom of boats or rocks sticking out in that version either, which doesn't show off the water graphics to its best extent. 18:43, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Derp
I'm a god's. 05:51, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * We are god's. And that vandalism has been there for over two hours. The only other edits between that and now have been some dude editing his clan community page and uploading personal images. 05:58, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I wish they'd take it down already to save people some time when they try searching there only to find nothing. 06:07, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Fix them (Zuriel's equipment). 17:08, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ty. ( 17:49, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

y u do dis
dis 18:40, January 5, 2012 (UTC)