User talk:Battleben

First!!
http://i.imgur.com/MGznutC.jpg

09:16, June 15, 2013 (UTC)

Zombies
Do the zombies from The Dead Walk! and from that Jmod infection thingy need an infobox? I mean, they have a unique model. Might be in the bestiary... 09:43, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, happy birthday! I hope you get something good. A pet Muspah, or something. 15:24, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Translucency
Please explain why you have, again, uploaded images that need translucency without their backgrounds? 19:47, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * I've warned you on this too many times. For the last time: It's not up to you whether an image with a translucent part will suffice with or without a background. ALL of them should be uploaded with a background. Now we are going to be stuck with fairies with wooden wings and a vampyre with green webbing until someone gets around to adding translucency to them. I have blocked you for three days. In this time, please, again, review RS:IMG. 02:59, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * I did not break any policies. The closing comment for Forum:Change to translucency methods was "Option 1 will be implemented,with common sense, of course.", and RS:IMG states "If adding particle transparency or translucency is deemed too arduous, normal transparency may be added without cutting out particles, but the image should then be reverted to the original state without transparency if it is aesthetically superior over a partially transparent form." In my opinion, for the fairies, the transed images were aesthetically superior. But yeah, we're probably going to need another Yew Grove to settle this, as RS:IMG is rather vague, as what's aesthetically superior is rather subjective. 08:34, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * You were warned that you were repeatedly disregarding policies, and that should you continue, action may be taken. You continued your disregard for the policies, and action was taken. It's quite simple. Note how you mentioned that what is aesthetically superior is subjective, yet you state that the transed version is aesthetically superior as if your opinion has some sort of objective proof. Also, RS:IMG is fairly clear. The "common sense" aspects deal with minor details where the part with translucency cannot be seen without inspecting the image closer. The images you uploaded require translucency on approximately half of the non-transed portion. This is clearly in violation of the policy. I suggest you take this break and make sure you follow policies in the future. Also, realize that you are the only user having this problem, so it's probably not an issue with the policy itself. 08:42, June 23, 2013 (UTC) unblock Denied.  08:47, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * I read the polices after being warned, and I thought for these images, the areas that required translucency were pretty small and barely noticable. And no, RS:IMG is not fairly clear, it says that images that require translucency are allowed if the transed images are aesthetically superior. In my opinion, they were, but in your opinion, they weren't. How is that not subjective? I am not saying that my opinion was any more valid than yours and fergies, but how was I supposed to know what other people thought was superior if they hadn't seen it? 08:51, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Wording of the policy aside, how can you possible say that the parts of this image which require translucency are "pretty small and barely noticable [sic]"? My first thought when viewing that image was, "What is wrong with her wings?" It has odd colors due to the background, and you can't possibly say that the difference that the background makes is negligible. 09:04, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, if you look at Fairy Very Wise and Fairy Nuff it isn't very noticable when you see the images scaled down on the actual pages. Anyway, I did Aeryka last, so I assumed she'd be like the other ones, but I can see the problem with her, and I guess I was wrong. Speaking of which, I forgot to resize the image of Fairy Aeryka's page, and now I am incapable of doing so, would you mind fixing that please? 09:10, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Since there seems to be some confusion on what exactly the policy means, I'll err on the on the side of caution in future and not trans ANY translucent images. Anyway, the only effect the block is having is preventing me from positively contributing to the wiki, so if anyone would be kind enough to unblock me, that would be great. 11:55, June 23, 2013 (UTC)

Would anyone care to tell me why I was blocked AGAIN? I hadn't even made any edits since Coel unblocked me. Furthermore, I have not yet received any decent reasons for my first block. (and no, having an disagreement over what an ambiguous section in RS:IMG means is not justification for a block, Blocks are for preventing further disruption to the wiki, not to to gain an advantage in a content dispute.) 08:03, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Special:Log/block 10:26, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * That doesn't answer my question. 15:50, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe my first three warnings were quite clear. In the fourth warning I said that if you breech RS:IMG again, I would take action. You did, and I took action. 18:31, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * And yet I did not breach RS:IMG. RS:IMG states that images should be reverted to the original state without transparency if it is aesthetically superior over a partially transparent form, which, for the fairies, I considered the transparent version to be aesthetically superior. I do agree that part of the policy is badly worded though, as what's aesthetically superior is completely subjective. At any rate, while this block is rather silly, i'm tired of arguing about it, so I'll just wait for it to end >_>. 19:05, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Smashing
is not what you got your custodian tools for. They are meant for maintenance purposes, and filenames should be descriptive. If they are already descriptive then don't move them. If you want to make that joke, just compress the file and upload it saying "Smashing the filesize" or whatever, but don't move the file just for a lame joke. 15:18, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

Hai
User talk:Fswe1. Have fun. 08:45, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

Ali/Wahi dialogue after Enakhra's Lament
http://pastebin.com/n0FC8GK3 05:34, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Slayercat
No idea what this slayercat thing is, but it's removing the ability to show/hide combat stats. 18:47, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed. 18:48, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * It was Mol who did that, and I concur with his comment of that edit... IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 19:13, July 1, 2013 (UTC)

In regards to this, shouldn't it at least be "Aviansie" instead of "Avianse"; avoiding a redirect? IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 05:40, July 2, 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Lumbridge?
Why did you name the NPCs with the new portal update NPC(The Battle of Lumbridge)? Where does it mention this anywhere? The NPcs aren't called that in game and none of the dialogue mentions it. It isn't mentioned in the update either. Are you getting this informaiton form sonewhere else, like the twitter acocunt or is it just your speculation?04ismailjj6 (talk) 14:54, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Tastes like diabetes
Sheldon and two cute piggies? I dun get it. Note that I haven't startee BHtB yet. 18:51, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Aye, true enough. Let's eat Sheldon. 06:33, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Stuff
Lady Keli, Ozan, Hassan, Ali Mirza, oh the obsolete humwnity. 20:27, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Please tell me you took images that don't need draw distance (so, everything except for the city overview) in Java. :P Also, ^^^^^^^^ 08:14, July 17, 2013 (UTC)

You're invited to my trim party!
Find out the details here. --BrenRS (talk) 02:29, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

bts leak
even when it's in the background? when the video wasn't about her (she wasn't even mentioned, just sneaky shown in the back)? 19:17, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I read that afterwards :P But I thought I could rationalize it by saying the bts video wasn't about Kara-Meir. 19:36, July 19, 2013 (UTC)

Template:Battle of Lumbridge
I made other changes (adding links, etc.), which you reverted, so I'm asking which part was ugly? I find that long navboxes are even uglier. 14:49, July 25, 2013 (UTC)

Sliske
Should User:Fswe1/Laboratory include 'the adventurer'? 08:34, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Meow. I'll use frog mask for chathead. Or chicken mask. You choose. 08:46, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you have any images of Meeting History where Guthix greets the humans as they come through the portal of life for use on Human Realm? 12:12, July 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, neat. I'll do it once I get back then. Wouldn't that also mean you could retake the Guthix image? Oh wait, cutscenes are broken... ;_; Btw, a new experiment is being conducted in my lab. 19:04, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Lumbridge record points
User:Ajente02 compiled a list of votes for every 24 hours. take a look. http://es.runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Muro:Ajente02 Mike111b (talk) 05:20, July 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * I've also got an approximation of the decrease rate of tears:
 * {| class="prettytable"

!colspan="2"|F2P http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110901220935/codesah/images/a/ad/Ajente02_Firma.JPG 05:32, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 550
 * x4
 * ~700
 * x3
 * ~900
 * x2
 * ~1,100
 * x1
 * 1,320
 * x0
 * }
 * But it's only an approximation, IDK if that's accepted here... Good luck anyways. --See ya':
 * 1,320
 * x0
 * }
 * But it's only an approximation, IDK if that's accepted here... Good luck anyways. --See ya':
 * But it's only an approximation, IDK if that's accepted here... Good luck anyways. --See ya':

Audacity and RS
Mind explaining how the former can be used to get sounds from the latter? 21:59, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

drunken dwarf
if I'm not mistaken, you were talking about the drunken dwarf earlier today. Someone just came into the chat saying: [01:06:05]  did anyone else met a drunken dwarf at the battlefield? [01:06:10]  *meet Thought you might wanna know. 23:08, July 28, 2013 (UTC)

Stuff
An unlisted music track appears to be playing when rogues/minelayers/etc. are summoned. Go! :P 14:21, July 29, 2013 (UTC)

Mervis Merton
All you said is true (I think), but I doubt language can change so much (Mahey'ish Medron to Mother Mallum) over the course of 200yrs or so... 17:40, August 2, 2013 (UTC)

Aviansie vs Avianse
Were the "Avianse" in this edit intentional, or are those indeed missing an 'i'? IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 13:41, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

Sea gods
Don't redirect deleted pages in an attempt to get your point across that you do not agree with the deletion. Sea gods are not worshiped like the camel god is. The sea gods were mentioned in ONE passing phrase. "By the gods" is a common real-life phrase, "by the sea gods" references that. That's all. 20:26, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Cutscenes
...is he mentally impaired? Make a thread called "Reddit response to Thatjim" or something to reply to this and complain. It's just ridiculous. 19:09, August 7, 2013 (UTC)

Quest icons
I visited UnusedFiles and found 50 of them sitting there. What did you plan on doing with them? Replacing the current images in the quest infobox perhaps? Maybe putting them in the same place as chatheads on NPC articles?

5th age religion
In one of the campfires they sid that while the trolls originally followed Bandos, they have now forgotten about him. Could you update File:5thage religion.png to reflect this? 10:14, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

Saradomin
It's not my responsability to make every section of every article better. I don't even have one appointed to me. I'm sure you know this is free for all. I assume I edited while you were busy writing and that this is the cause of your annoyance. You know I'm open to discussion... you can always to to my talk page and discuss stuff there is you disagree with me. I take it you, just as myself, don't want to make things more troubled - please do the same. 11:55, September 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * Not quite, it was a part about his moral character... not the greater good, or what he ays is for the greater good. 12:22, September 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * From the article:


 * The emphasis in the quote shows the parts I thought it was about. I see nothing about "greater good". Seems to me you're trying really hard to blame me of stuff I didn't do. 13:46, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, if you look in the history of Saradomin (not the character but the page :P) then you see I mentioned something like: "it's not about order, it's about his moral character". That's my genuine view. The paragraph I copied above it reads "epitome of all that is good". In my eyes 'Good' says more about 'Morality' than it does about 'Order', so a genocide (normally not regarded as an epitome of all that is good) can be seen as such (a Moral issue, not an Order issue). Yes, he does this to achieve order... because 'the only orderly Naragi is a dead Naragi' - but that was not the point, the point was "the epitome of all that is good", and that is morality.
 * Also, the greater good could, in some moral theories, be part of morality (like Utilitarianism, but not Kantianism). The greater good has nothing to do with Order per se, maybe 'the greater order' (do something slightly chaotic to achieve a greater order - within the philosophy of Order, this can certainly be seen as morally good within the philosophy, but not more-or-less intrinsically linked to morality; like genocide is).
 * hope this answers your last comment to:
 * 1. I don't think it's a paragraph about Order, but Ethics/Morality;
 * 2. Genocide is an example/illustration of his morality; and
 * 3. There is no direct need to refer to the greater good, hence I didn't do that in the paragraph, while people still seem to want to read that into it).  10:12, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Haha, yes, tell me about it. I know the feeling my friend. You don't even address the points I make. Not always at least. While I try the best to do so. But luckaly we don't have to agree 100%, we could also try to... compromise? Or just not talk about it. You may choose ;)  10:26, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * With this issue alone; with other issues too; with me entirely; or even with the entire RSwiki-community? 10:35, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh. Hmm.. okay. That's not so good. Only because I disagree and keep arguing? Not to be mean, but you do the same thing, in essence. Or am I mistaking?? 10:40, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * So, we're both jsut very stubborn/steadfast, not necessarily a bad thing though. But if the issue was resolved anyway, why did you continue to argue with me? 10:52, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Wizards and...um
If a male witch is called a warlock what's a female wizard called? I'm genuinely curious. 04ismailjj6 (talk) 09:58, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Aye, I figured they might not be witches, but decided to go by Harry Potter terminology. :P Anyway, you're right. @Ismail: In RuneScape, "wizard" is unisex, in most other fantasy stuff, a female wizard is generally a witch. 13:53, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

History
User:Fswe1/Laboratory2 - Done first two sections (pre-1st Age and 1st Age). Please check and correct where necessary, or add stuff. =3 18:58, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Bank Search results?
So when did they add that into the game? Just wondering how unobservant I am :)  04ismailjj6 (talk) 13:23, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Cheese
"The Abbey of St. Elspeth Citharede is a large abbey in the desert where the followers of Saint Elspeth live. The organisation and abbey were founded in 99 or 100 of the Fifth Age." True? 19:14, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

Mahjarrat quote
If you know how to properly cite them... why not do that?? Removing an improper citation is worse than no citation at all. Also... I think my citation gave more information. Fswe said these quotes need to say something about their personality, just citing where the quotes were said do not really give proper context, I don't see why you would remove that. Please... explain that to me. I understand a need for uniformity, but I also think we can divert from that if necessary. (See reference number 8 for example, it has a quote to illustrate the point being made in the text.) 11:45, September 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks :3 I'm afraid I will do so anyway :P 11:59, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

About the quest rework thread you're writing
Hi, Wahi. I'm not sure if you got this message I sent to you in-game, but I heard that you were making a thread about quest reworks. I have been slowly writing a similar thread, and I though to myself that it would be a good idea to ask you if we could co-operate with this thread and write it together (or at least help you with the writing of the thread by providing you with the information I have gathered so far). What do you think about this?

AquaMage2459 (talk) 17:13, September 25, 2013 (UTC)AquaMage2459

Where did u get the Zamorak chathead?????

above the lore
3 october? according to podbean, its 4 october. where did you get 3rd? 04:53, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * link plz? 08:50, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * where is it specifically mentioned in runeradio that it was released in 3 october? 09:05, October 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * we should use a reliable source, i.e. podbean. we have been using "podbean dates" so far for the other podcasts. and it is easy to check... can i change it back to 4 october, to be consistent with the other podcasts? 09:41, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

realms
damn... I wish we could find it more easily :P cos so far I've only seen stuff that's pointing me at least somewhat to Britain being part of earth  15:23, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

RE:RE:Fusswell Wiki
Suppose you're right... Given that I'm the only one to call you Wahipietel, it must have been me. A pox on me! You could add moustaches though. Like Hreidmar's old one. And a top hat. And a monocle. Well, see you in a week's time! 17:17, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

File:Sliske's Grand Ascendancy Gathering.png
Hey Ben, not sure if you're aware but it is lacking Kharsai =/ 20:09, October 16, 2013 (UTC)

Alvis
Is this true? I checked the transcript, but Meike doesn't seem to indicate anything of the sort. 21:06, October 19, 2013 (UTC)