RuneScape:Requests for splitting/Treasure Trails/Full guide

Treasure Trails/Full guide
I'll open this RfS by saying the concept behind this page may seem nice at first glance, but it's an idea that in reality plays out poorly. I'm all for the idea of making a single page to look at for solving a clue scroll, but because of the nature of this D&D, we should not have all four on a single page.

So my proposal is to make this page an index of new four subpages that will come with this proposal: easy, medium, hard, and elite. Pretty obvious, huh? This should make our treasure trails guide(s) much more comprehensive because readers will only find information about the level of trail they are looking for instead of having the other 3.

For the most part, this proposal will do away with the transclusion method, but that's fine; it was kind of a bad idea anyways. The exception is the elite subpage because scans, celtic knots, and compasses are exclusive to that level, and that level only uses those types of clues (and puzzle boxes). Speaking of puzzle boxes, we can keep that transcluding for the hard and elite treasure trail subpages, but I would like to handle the images differently: use noinclude on the actual puzzle box page so that images of the wrong tier don't show up on the subpage and then have the appropriate images on the actual (level) subpage.

Everything else will need to be recopied though; however, that shouldn't be a problem. Very few edits (if any at all) are made to any of the pages (excluding compass/scan) such that I believe we're as close to completion as we need to be. It will be a mostly copy-paste job really. Find what belongs to that level of scroll and copy that onto the subpage, leave everything else out. We'll be able to take out some unimportant stuff; e.g. the "what level scroll does this appear on" columns.

It may seem like this will be quite a bit of work, but a cleaner and more navigable guide for treasure trails will be a very worthwhile pay-off. I really can't think of how exactly to split this page, but for the most part, this proposal is solid and can work. If need be, we can certainly buff out the lesser details as this goes on.

Split - I don't think this page knows what "condensation" means. It means to be condensed, smaller. It's more of a medley. 14:22, December 26, 2013 (UTC)