RuneScape:Featured images/archive13

Fishing Guild
Description: The bank of the fishing Guild, a hotspot for master fishers.

Reason: It is update, and I like the detail, and amount of material, such as the obelisk.


 * Support - As nominator. 00:06, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - brillant, really looks realistic. 01:44, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Nice detail and angle. 04:03, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Simply awesome. 15:41, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Too brown and too foggish. 16:28, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak support - I saw the image in full size and changed my mind. The colours are wonderful! But I still hate the fog near those trees... 10:20, March 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - If I took the image I would crop it slightly more on the left side, but apart from that it is great! I especially like the opened door on the hut. 04:44, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - pretty good. 06:06, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Looks great! I love the angle and the scenery. 12:00, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Those white flowers in the background ruin it. 13:26, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Slight support - Per Fswe1. 20:28, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Its a brown hut... 23:43, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination is successful. 07:19, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

The Flame Tapestry
Description: The Flame Tapestry in Zemouregal's base during The Curse of Arrav.

Reason: The lighting, angle are great and the colors great!!.


 * Support - As nominator. 06:27, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The angle just isn't right, and what are those things at the bottom?
 * Neutral - It looks great when enlarged, but ugly when it's small. Also, what are those things and the bottom? 08:04, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Usually, I would support this, but somethings I don't like, like the wall, and the white orbs at the bottom look like a few User:Hapi007 heads cut off. 10:22, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Ugly colours. 14:13, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per above -- 19:55, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Very blurry when small sized. 04:45, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The only thing I can see is a carpet and something in the background. 06:06, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Its just really boring 11:58, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Too vague, it doesn't really show anything. 13:24, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per all opposers. 20:25, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * - Unsuccessful. 07:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sloane
Description: A Hero of Strength

Reason: i been keeping it back for a bit, but i cant take it any more, this image i made a while ago is just epic, i worked on it for 3 hours, every detail it at it best, it is just epic, the blade detail just gives it it texture and the angle just makes it amazing, i cant say how amazing it is in any other way, it just...epic!


 * support- as a Nominator -- 12:00, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose _ I just don't like what the guy looks like. 14:12, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - The angle and detail are nice, but his mouth (if he has one) and shoulders (especially the leftern one) look awkward. Also, you should change the description. 'A Hero of Heroes' is not very discriptive. 16:41, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I like the axe, but Sloane's beard looks terrible, and so does his outfit. So basically-No. -- 19:55, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Sciz -- 04:11, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Sciz. 08:24, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The main enemy of every NPC: Angles! 04:52, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - You did a great job and its a great picture but the subject is just a bit boring. It was taken well bu the subject is not quite good enough. 06:06, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It looks really low definition, The feet are almost squares and he has an awful 2 tone head. 11:59, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * very slight Oppose - It is a fantastic image, great quality... And the face ruins it. Such a shame that they don't give NPCs mouths and noses  13:25, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Slight oppose - Per above. 20:27, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * - Unsuccessful. 07:30, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Crashed Star
Description: A Crashed Star.

Reason: It's basically like a rock, but a nicely detailed one


 * Support - As nominator. 14:24, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - What image does it replace? 15:07, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The image replaces one that has a player standing beside it. However,.. I'm not sure it should be as although it is cropped and cut out neatly, it doesn't represent runescape HD, the colours are just.. black. I think it's too dull! 16:44, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * No... Nominations for Replacement should replace already featured images. There is however no featured image of a crashed star. I think Murd3rlogist placed this nomination under the wrong heading... 16:56, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, let me change it 04:19, March 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - While Enigma should be commended for the amazing job he did on the transparency for the image, it doesn't make up for that the whole image is composed of about 3 shades of black. 04:41, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's a just a rock. I don't really see it as a Featured image on the main page.
 * Oppose - It's just really boring. 06:06, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's a just a rock. I don't really see it as a Featured image on the main page. 05:54, March 27, 2010 (UTC)Scoala12345
 * Oppose - Per Evil Yanks - nice, but dull. 09:59, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - If this ever gets featured I'm gonna rip my stomach apart then cook it on the oven and finally eat it. Then since I've got no stomach, the cycle repeats... Yeah, so it's pretty much like that. -- 13:35, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - There is like ten thousand rocks around runescape... This just doesn't look special at all. 12:02, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per all. 20:32, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess its all oppose, someone cancel this nomination, please? 15:09, March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Still 3 days to go. Might as well wait for the nomination to end. 00:30, March 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  04:31, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Count Draynor fight
Description: Locked in battle with Count Draynor.

Reason: The lighting is brilliant and the image can be used as exemplry use of the orb of oculus. the image also appeals to the lower level end of the spectrum of players who visit the runescape wiki.


 * Support - As nominator. 18:34, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's a pretty epic angle, my compliments. But it's too dark in there, Draynor's cape covers half of his body and I don't like the HP bars, which by the way look too small here. 18:39, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Fswe1 -- 19:36, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Fswe1. 03:21, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Fswe1. 17:04, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I actually like how epic the fight is, and a fan of the angle 14:19, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It just looks bad.
 * Oppose - I love the background and all. However, some of the armour on the player and NPC just looks odd and bizarre. The health bars don't make the image any moar appealing as how it's not really appealing at all right naough. 22:26, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Slight Oppose- Bad angle, but if a better picture was taken I would support. 02:29, April 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - What the hell is wrong with you people? Okay so it's no Nomad or Wise Old Man, but it's the best fight image on the Wiki. Sure the hitpoints bars are there but then you guys should get rid of it; you can do that right. [[File:Silver sickle.png‎‎]] Asparagoose   15:37, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Unsuccessful. 02:05, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

TzTok Jad
Description: Meet your doom.

Reason: Liek the detail.


 * Support - As nominator. 14:16, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - The image does not fulfill one of the criterion as it is not taken from the RuneScape game client by a Wiki user, but rather taken from File:Jad vs Roosters.jpg which was used in a Postbag. 14:37, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * So... what now? Nominate a new one? Btw, isn't it 'one of the criteria'?  15:07, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * criterion (plural criteria or criterions) ... Although common, the use of criteria as a singular noun is incorrect. 15:12, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair 'nuff. Im gonna go bust my arse through 63 waves of tzhaar. Someone delete this section plawks? 15:31, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but it should be a plural, shouldn't it? One out of more, or am I imagining things (common problem)? 16:29, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its only violating a single criterion so is singular. Anyway why are we debating this?  18:42, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its supposed to be plural, you don't say he ate one of his lobster, you say he ate one of his lobsters. 18:47, April 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Chess is right... but why is a grammar discussion going on here? 18:49, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why not? -- 19:50, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is this discussion really needed?
 * Yes, we are digressing quite a bit here, not too necessary. 05:45, April 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - Not a great angle, the description and reason need work.  23:23, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Image is not taken from RuneScape game client, by wiki users.  05:45, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Altar of Life
Description: An unactivated altar with a strange symbol, where the Homunculus summons awkward creatures.

Reason: It has good lighting. Not too dark, not too bright. It's also perfectly centered and pretty symmetric (except for the dirt to the left). You can see the strange things on the altar. And it's 4xAA. Click to enlarge.


 * Support - As nominator. 16:20, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak support - the only thing I don't like is the unrealistic water 02:25, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I love the lighting effects! Very nice. 04:35, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Great picture one of the best I have ever seen. 06:06, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak support - Per Porp1 12:01, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The unrealistic water and the ugly, unsymmetrical-making dirt ruin the image for me. It's a good image, but just not FIMG-good. 13:27, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Oli4burggraa, also I don't like the angle. 20:30, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - To dark, whats the symbol on the banner, i can't see it, i dont think it should be a Featured image -- 18:29, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I'd read the article, in fact I will now.
 * Notice of intent - Deadline for nomination extended by a week to 9 April 2010. 04:31, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Supoort - Looks kinda nice. 14:16, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - just dont like it much 16:05, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I'm not a fan of the straight curtain-like water. Nor am I liking the dirt. However, I'm not sure if that is a sewer in front of it, but it makes it looks odd. Also the dirt makes an awkward entrace to the fountain's right (not your right) side. 22:28, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per opposition. 18:50, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Oli.  23:20, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  05:45, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Easter Bunny
Description: When Easter Come, the rabbit come out.

Reason:Quite a good angle, the way he clooking is also quite nice, it would also give the easter feeling all year round, it quite i happy images


 * Support - As nominator. 18:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - He looks cheesy, pixellated, and somewhat scary. 18:31, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose - Per Liquidhelium. Though I love the Bunny of Thousand and One Eggs, this shot of him looks a bit... not FIMG-quality-ish. But if imagining, it would look good on the main page. 18:36, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - a nice image for everybody to enjoy which is a fairly cheery sight when entering the rs wiki 18:38, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose - Per Liquid. 03:20, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Helm, and you should change the description, too. 17:05, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I wouldn't trust him with my small children. 04:45, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * ROFL! 06:54, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I couldn't resist after people said how he looked scary. 09:08, April 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - I was going to oppose per Evil but i like bunnys  06:16, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Cute. 14:15, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - per shadow
 * Weak Oppose - The Bunny is a cute character, creepy in some ways, but cute in other ways. However, this image in particular isn't very appealing or special. The picture is a bunny. . . but an Easter one. So my count isn't a large oppose, very slight. 22:25, April 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose- Ugly. Period. 02:27, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Notice - Nomination extended for one week. 02:07, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Liquid.  23:22, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I think it looks nice and bad.Like Guthix I think it is neither ugly,nor good-looking. Ocenar 20:48, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's ugly. 18:47, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Most fluffy bunnies are cute. This one, however, is creepy. 05:31, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  06:34, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Puffin
Description: A high detail picture of a puffin

Reason: One of RS Wikia's most detailed images in my opinion.


 * Support - As nominator. 05:54, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Very angular and there is no AA. 07:20, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Cute  07:22, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Looks like it made up of squares. 09:39, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Messed up. 10:30, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Angular, no AA, awkward paws and the colour changes are too big. I mean that it's first dark grey, and turns a lot brighter in a few pixels. Nice pose, but regular quality. 16:12, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's kinda the point Fswe1. It's supposed to look shaded and uneven. Every runescape surface is uneven, and there's nothing you can do about it. 22:10, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Correct, but it makes a bird look unnatural this close. 05:27, April 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - This picture is zoomed in so much that a lot of the detail simply disappeared. 22:12, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * comment - per Chessmaster. It IS made up of squares... everything in Runescape is. Everything Digital is! --216.240.70.66 20:56, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per yanks.  23:19, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per all opposers. 00:42, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's ugly. 18:43, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Too boxy. A real bird would have feathers and wings. It doesn't look realistic. 05:42, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Unsuccessful. -- 01:25, April 14, 2010 (UTC)