User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

For 10 Mage ADD copy paste (Personal note for me)
 * One
 * Two
 * Three
 * Four
 * Five
 * Six

SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM

Merry Xmas to you also, but please do not say it here I will just assume that everyone minus three people have left me an Xmas greeting template. Thank you.--Degenret01 02:09, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:DEU also applies to you too
K 03:14, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Talk Page
Yes, he was inviting all of that by having the userbox on his page (which I removed). However, that does not justify people doing it in the first place. Liquid is entitled to his opinions just as much as you or I, and we all have to respect that. By allowing people to do what they have been doing to Liquid, we are saying "If you have a minority opinion, then we can give you as much crap about it as we want." I don't want to be part of a community where difference of opinion is suppressed, so I am determined to kill this issue off before it actually becomes an issue. Honestly, if people treated me half as badly as they treat Liquid, I would have left the wiki ages ago. I have no idea how he finds the will to stay at all. A Yew Grove thread would be counter productive here, because that would only cause more wiki drama, making the whole situation immensely worse. 22:01, December 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Calm down, please. RS:DDD only applies to discussions, and I would categorize the vast majority of that as spam. At the same time, I will admit that I shouldn't have removed the userbox from Liquid's page, though I wont stop him if he adds it back. My concern here is not so much Liquid as it is the fact that we are tolerating this because he has a difference of opinion:  (not including a link for every preloaded spam edit). If we are going to allow that, then why would anyone want to be here? What reason is there to think that if one gives their opinion, he/she will not end up in Liquid's position? I get that Liquid doesn't seam all that concerned that he's treated the way he is, but that's still not enough to justify the fact that we are treating anyone like that at all.  10:23, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. "How would gay people feel seeing that userbox of hate and intolerance displayed on his page and realizing we allow it on this wiki." I did ask him to remove the userbox from his page, as I agree to an extent that kind of thing should stay off the wiki. However, the agreement stops here: "Until that box was gone every message was certainly proper." Consider this statement, "How would gay people feel seeing that userbox of hate and intolerance displayed on his page and realizing we allow it on this wiki." If the goal is to show that we don't tolerate "hateful userboxes", then the real way to accomplish this is to remove it from his page, yes? Spamming his talk page will do nothing, and by doing so, we are showing that we allow people to do that if they have a minority opinion. While Parsons is more innocent than Liquid, you may remember Forum:Community has gone too far. Consider the similarities. "I'm disgusted by the way many of our members are acting. I personally don't have an affection for Parsons, but I'm not going to treat him like crap, even if he makes a stupid forum thread. God knows I've done the same myself. All the signature stuff has gone on too long. I don't think Parsons was right, but I don't think anyone quoting him in their signature is right either. I don't even think we need consensus here, this is a strong breach of UTP, and I also think it reflects very badly on the wiki as a whole. I'm sure it started as a joke, just to have fun, which is fine. But when I see more signatures with a line from the above linked forum than without it, I can tell you things have gone on too far" -Haloolah123. 12:16, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Then I will cease to comment on the Liquid/gay marriage/talk page issue, as you've requested. However, don't you find the sentence "Valuable time of mine I could have spent staring at a wall has been wasted because of his actions," a bit arrogant? 19:32, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

summery
First off, thanks for answering. However, couldn't we write a summery in our own words? I'm no law expert, but if wikipedia can give a plot summery for this and other books,I don't see why we can't summerise runescape stuff.

Example: Beyond Trollheim details Dwarven explorer Nestor Pengreni's attempts to visit the north. During these attempts he met up with zombie trolls belonging to Lucien. He also briefly visited God Wars Dungeon, but was too afraid of the fighting to venture deep into the cave. At the end of the book Pengreni states that he will next be traveling to the swamps of Mort Myre.

75.174.239.251 15:53, December 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Great. I'll get to work on it asap, though I can't access the higher leveled dungioneering journals.. 75.174.239.251 16:22, December 12, 2010 (UTC)

Moving hosts
I think that the YG thread needs to be reopened. There has been daily discussion and I feel that there were many unanswered questions on both sides. I felt that there were still answers I could give to people to alleviate their concerns about moving. I feel that you have closed the discussion prematurely. There is still much to discuss, it is a big decision and not one to be made lightly. A thread of this kind may take several weeks before a consensus is achieved. -- 18:27, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with above. Also, I don't agree that current consensus is half stay-half go, most opposers said that they will move with the community if the community moves. 19:03, December 11, 2010 (UTC)

Wikia+Plus
Per recent closure of Forum:Wowscape Wiki: Ways to stop this, Wikia has enabled the WikiBuilder as an extension of the ad free wiki campaign back in May of 2010 for the first 100 wikis with under 20,000 page-views a month for $19.95 a month. However while that is more or less gone as new wikis can opt-in to this new Wikia+Plus at ~ $4.95 per month. At the current time, established wikis receive the error for upgrading right now, it's a small roll-out that will be extended to established wikis soon (whether that be another seven months from now to a year I do not know). Last thing on my list are the details of this ordeal. According to the page, this wiki would be subject to some advertisements, but nowhere near as many as there currently are. Just food for thought. 06:18, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Wiki search
You could do a Google search for that. 06:26, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn, I got ninja'd. I was going to suggest that as well.  Unfortunately you can't search by namespace.  I wonder if we could get Lucene Search enabled here.   06:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lucien is real? He does searches? I thought he was a bad person.--Degenret01 06:40, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Vandal spree
Yeah, the range is way too large to block. I don't think it's all by one person anyhow, seems like individual cases of vandalism. It should die off, I think. 09:02, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

You're NOT FUNNY
Hahaha. I so laughed when you blocked my account. You're such a wannabe admin.

Oh, btw. SUROK DRAINS MAGIC.

Noob.

09:51, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, Degen is such a wanna-be admin. :P - 09:56, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Will you vote for me pl0x? I want to be rooler of de ruionedscape wikee.--Degenret01 10:51, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

No
Get a life. 10:00, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

ORLY?
I don't give a sht. 10:03, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Really?
I find it becomes easier to find the information that you really want. Perhaps if others agreed with you, I'll remove them. Sounds fair? 11:03, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, let's just say that I was being bold and leaving them on, till another person rmvs/undo's it? 11:06, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Ok fine, I has removed it. 11:11, December 24, 2010 (UTC)