User talk:Dtm142

Re: Concerning the f2p forum rants.
"In addition, f2p is largely the 'scum of Gielenor'."
 * Actually, I wholeheartedly agree with that; scammers and macros don't want to pay for an account that will most likely be banned within no more than two weeks' time. Of course, it's scum like that which give the "good" F2Pers a bad name. Therefore, although your statement is correct, I think it's slightly arbitrary in the favor of the argument that the majority Gielinor's scum is F2P. You also forgot to mention the F2Pers that don't cheat or scam, Members that do, people that change from one to the other once or repeatedly, etc. That's basically all I can say without involuntarily turning this into a flame war. =] Please respond at The Pug's Page with any responding comments or questions.

Random events
Hi! First of all, you were right. And, I'm going to give the whole page a complete make-over. The thing is: I don't see the point of sorting out those random events. Isn't the mimi also complex to complete? I think the sandwich lady is easier than the maze... Can't I just make a large list, or something?--. 18:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Stinko Blocked
Due to Stinko's recent outburst on the YG, it is clear he no longer wishes to edit here. I have blocked him for one month for his comments since this discussion started and the most recent ones especially, violating the UTP. Please remove his powers if you are the first 'crat to receive this message. He may reapply for adminship once his month is up. Christine 15:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Forums
There's a new poll being requested. Can you plz approve it and create the poll? Blackhole252 19:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Dtm142 22:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! [[Image:Disk of returning.PNG]] Blackhole252 [[Image:Disk of returning.PNG]] 12:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Forum talk:Index spam filter
I noticed that Forum talk:Index was deleted by the Janitor GHe. GHe's deletion summary was "spam". However, there was only one spam edit made by an anonymous user, who blanked the whole page, which had many discussions on it. I thought I should restore the discussions, so I checked the spammer's checkbox (which I thought would restore every edit except the spam), and clicked "Restore". But for some reason, only the spammer's edit appeared in the page history. I tried again, this time not checking any boxes. This time it worked, so I tried to undo the spammer's edit. It didn't work; the spam filter prevented me from editing the page. It said, "The following text is what triggered our spam filter: forum talk:index". I tried rollbacking the edit instead, it worked that time, but then I couldn't post the topic I wanted to put on the Index talk in the first place because it was again blocked by the spam filter. What is the spam filter, and is there any way to fix it? 19:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just a note, C Teng. You only check the boxes of the revisions you want restored. That's why only the spam edit appeared. I'm pretty sure it says it right on the page... Christine 19:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see now. I don't undelete much; it said to leave all checkboxes empty if you wanted to restore the whole thing, and I guess I didn't notice the second part of the instructions. That still doesn't explain how to fix the spam filter, though. 17:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Permission
Hi,

I'm just asking for permission to use an image of yours: http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/9761/dtm142srswikilogo.png If you give permission for me to use it, just say so on my talk page.