RuneScape:Featured images/archive-delisting

TzTok-Jad
Reason: - Breaks the guideline: The image is taken from RuneScape game client.


 * Support Neutral - Tollerach made a good point. I support delisting after replacement images are chosen. And was the guideline made after featuring? 22:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The criteria listed have not been put through consensus or otherwise approved by anyone other than AZ. Besides, all of the images I submitted which have been supported unanimously do not meet the current criteria. 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ample time was given to discuss the criteria for nomination. I just assumed that since no one actually bothered to discuss this, I took the initiative of finalising the criteria.  If you wish, please discuss this specific criterion in the talk page.  13:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The guidelines were put in place to get this up and running. I disagree with this guideline at this time.  Until we have several good game client images, I say we leave these images in. Besides, they look good.  23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Once we have more ingame images, then it can come down. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Guthix
Reason: - Breaks the guideline: The image is taken from RuneScape game client.


 * Support Neutral - Tollerach made a good point. I support delisting after replacement images are chosen. And was the guideline made after featuring? 22:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 13:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The criteria listed have not been put through consensus or otherwise approved by anyone other than AZ. Besides, all of the images I submitted which have been supported unanimously do not meet the current criteria. 22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ample time was given to discuss the criteria for nomination. I just assumed that since no one actually bothered to discuss this, I took the initiative of finalising the criteria.  If you wish, please discuss this specific criterion in the talk page.  13:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - The guidelines were put in place to get this up and running. I disagree with this guideline at this time.  Until we have several good game client images, I say we leave these images in. Besides, they look good.  23:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I must admit, its a good image. Leave it until we have more ingame images. 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful.  11:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Avatar of Creation(1)
Description: A battle for the Avatar of Creation at Soul Wars. Reason: Too cluttered with players, the health bars and various prayers don't look good.

12:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Support deletion - As nominator. 01:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Opose deletion - It's one of the best images i've seen :)
 * Oppose - This picture isn't just about the Avatar, but it helps. We get a nice view of the Avatar, as well as the chaos of Soul Wars; and it's not like the HP bars are taking up the majority of the screen. Admittedly, it is a tiny bit cluttered with the Prayers and HP Bars, but not to the point where it detracts from the image immensely. -- [[Image:Dragon two-handed sword.png|Beware the underrated.]] Pikaandpi  Berserker Fury![[Image:Bandoschestplate.gif|Hit hard or go home.]]‎ 14:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If a replacement image is found, the image can be nominated under "Nominations to replacement"
 * Support replacement - If you can find a tie Soul Wars world, I'm sure you can find one that isn't so cluttered. [[Image:Saradomin sword.PNG|25px]]    Tehnoobshow101  18:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm free-to-play. 05:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Support replacement - If a better photo is taken I support replacement.-- 19:26, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Image has been nominated for replacement.  09:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

TzTok-Jad (2) and Guthix (2)


Previous nomination: See above.

Reason: These images were not taken from RuneScape game client, and are used under "Fair use". These were one of the first few images to be featured on the Main Page. Now that we have about 30+ images, I think it is time that we removed them.


 * Support - as nominator. 16:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Jad, Neutral about Guthix - I never liked Jad's image anyways. You can't even see him very well. The Guthix image is nice (maybe replace it with an image of Guthix during Meeting History?). 17:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If you have the image, please nominate it in "Nominations for replacement". Thanks. 17:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nominator; they really were only kept as there wasn't many featured images at the time. Now there's more we should apply the rules to them, and delist them. 18:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Both - Finally!
 * Support both - per Azliq. 08:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - per nom. 10:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both Sorry, but they were always a bit... I dunno. They just didn't seem well. Especially Guthix.
 * Support both - For the reason explained in the description
 * Support both - Per nom. 00:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nom. 18:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support both - Per nom. 07:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Both images are delisted from the Featured images list. 20:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Zanik
Reason: In my opinion, the image doesn't diserve to have a place in the first page...The quality seems like its 2nd category.


 * Support - As nominator
 * Weak Support - It's true, the quality of this picture can't match the quality of the others now, but I still <3 Zanik. 13:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but the image criteria is only about quality,size etc ...If you love or not the npc does not metter for the voting and it will take as a comment.
 * Actually, I'm still supporting the nomination, and I'm STILL commenting on the bad quality. If I'm SUPPORTING you, and just made it weak (as if it won't be delisted, look at the support already), there's no need to flip out. Again.
 * Gosh I am not fliping out, I was only informing...
 * Support - To be honest, I was contemplating nominating it myself. We have a lot more featured images now which I feel greatly exceed this image in quality. 14:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - ITS HORRIBLE. Yuck! 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - As said before, it lacks the large quality and detail than the other images. When you look at this, the first word in your mind will most likely not be "wow!" 15:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It will be "eek!" 15:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I never really liked it anyway. She looks scary! 19:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - It doesn't look good on main page, I don't think any npc chatheadi image ever will look good on main page. Secondly I don't even think that it's so good image, that deserves nomination of Featured Image. 07:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If a guy that plays wow or some oter game like that opens runescape wiki and see this image it will certanly say: omfg runescape realy sucks 11:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Image is delisted from the Featured images list. 18:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Brassica Prime
Description: All hail Brassica Prime!

Reason: It shows the size of the cabbage god compared to the player but the colours are a bit dull and dead.

Old nomination - Found here.


 * Support Delisting - As nominator. -- 16:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - It's a pointless picture, it's just a huge cabbage and a player with some sparkles. >_>
 * Support Delisting - It should be removed from the featured images but not from the wiki, because it is a discontinued event. 17:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Per Requiem and Gragon. --George10 98 04:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Per Requiem, pointless image. 08:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * support delisting - Per all... and the player ruins it 08:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just a note to you all. Most of the images here don't really have any point, featured images are chosen based on image quality. 08:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Delisting - Its not that great an image, and as said before, seeing the player there ruins it 14:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination for delisting is successful. 14:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Dagganoth Prime
Reason The picture is taken from the runescape website (the original uploader of this picture didn't take the picture, he "robbed" from Jagex) and the Dagganoth claw looks blured.

Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1


 * Check http://www.runescape.com/c=3ZuvmPJsjJc/kbase/guid/waterbirth_island_dungeon_members
 * Support - As Nominator  18:08, September 6, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nobody own anything in this wiki. Instead of saying "owner of this picture" it would be better to say the original uploader.
 * The blurry part could be my fault, since I touched up the transparency when I cropped the image. 09:39, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per nominator, monster images are boring - also, you misspelled 'robbed' in the reason section.
 * Comment - Lol im portuguese... so my english sucks a little. :D 09:25, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * It's cool, just always looking out for my Wikians ^w^


 * Support - Looks pretty bad, and that's not surprising since it came from the Knowledge Base! 00:22, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - It's from the Knowledge Base! 03:03, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Muzzy - -- 03:36, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per nom. 16:07, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Oli. 14:23, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't see why we have to wait like 6 days to get this removed from featured images, it MUST be deleted without a nomination for delisting. This is just my opinion and I think it should be like that. 02:07, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't really like monster images, I think only pictures of scenery should be FIMG. -- 18:43, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination for delisting is successful. 07:22, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Fishing Guild
Reason - This image isn't really scenery, it's not of a boss monster, but it's a dock with players fishing in it. I don't like this image, as it doesn't show anything epic like the dragon forge, or anything like that. It's basically just some dock with players fishing. You can't even tell it's the Fishing guild. Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1


 * Support As nom. -- 18:52, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - There's more to RuneScape than monsters and ancient ruins. This picture is a very nice picture of the communal aspect to the game. 19:45, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Although this picture isn't the best, it captures the community of RS at it's best, something some pictures can't do.
 * Oppose - It's lovely. 15:47, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose - I really like it. It isn't the very best picture in terms of beauty, but it captures the daily lives of many players, and it shows what most people do on RuneScape, which is training their skills and making money. 15:55, September 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I really like the rich shade of blue, it's what makes it a nice picture. 21:57, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination for delisting is unsuccessful.  11:49, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Gu'tanoth
Reason: This image is rather dull, it doesn't really show anything either. All it is is dead colours mixed with more dead colours.

Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive2


 * Support - As nom. 21:57, September 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - There's a huge void of action and content right in the center of the image, and it isn't very pleasing to look at. 02:48, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I like this image as it looks very relistic and shows off RuneScape's grahics. 14:52, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * How does it remotely look realistic? And how does it show off the graphics? This is a horrible example of how good RuneScape graphics are. 23:08, September 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - Per nominator. 16:45, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Quoting Pika: we need some more pictures of different races across RuneScape (aside from some Humans in most of our featured images, the Goblins in the Chosen Commander Image, and various enemies throughout many of our screens, we lack different races). I agree wholeheartedly. I don't agree that this image is dull, it has some nice detail and is overall, a very interesting picture. 11:48, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's just awesome to look at. It's better than most location images... . 10:19, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
 * Then why Oppose? Maybe I'm not getting the sarcasm...? 15:21, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * He's opposing it being delisted i.e. supporting it remaining listed. 17:49, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes lol sorry didn't read the "nominations for delisting" thing. 01:04, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Support - I don't really know. There's the fact that it's dull and the ogres look like their really tired and CBA'ed to do anything. But then there's the fact that having pictures of monsters in their habitats are good...
 * Notice of intent - Nomination for delisting is extended by a week to 28 September 2009. 12:17, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I can't see what is wrong with it. It is a good image of Ogres. 08:05, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's perfectly fine. 15:39, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - It seems pretty good.. 18:35, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Nomination for delisting is unsuccessful.  06:59, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Bandos' throne room
Reason: One thing ruins this picture for me. Zanik. She is on of the most well known, favorite NPCs in RuneScape, but her graphics let her down. Untill she gets her graphics update, she will ruin this picture, as she sticks out. If anyone finds a image of this place without Zanik, we can use it to replace this one. She just sticks out like a sore toe.

Previous nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive3


 * Support - As nominator. 08:15, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak support - Though I like the area and Zanik looks like a yellow and brown dot on thumbnail, dots can be evil >:D OMG!!!!! --> . -- 11:10, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I agree, I don't like this picture greatly, for a featured image... and yes, Zanik sticks out, just too much.
 * Support - I dnno, I just don't like it... -- 03:09, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - ...what's happening? A goblin standing on a statue. Hoo-ray. 23:45, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Its very unattractive 22:15, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't like it. It's just some pixels (it looks very pixelated) with some different colours and a blob of some other colours in the middle. 22:16, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - I don't like it either 22:39, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Who even nominated this -.- It's horrible -- 03:31, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * Hapi did -- 19:48, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * No need to point fingers, we all have the right to our opinion. 20:50, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not pointing fingers, I'm just telling missy who nominated the original; by the way, that was a unanimous decision -- 22:14, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * I was talking to the both of you somewhat To Missy, saying that is kinda rude to the person who nominated it, and to Porp, that's kinda rude to say it out loud (however, you wouldn't have said it in the first place if Missy hadn't asked ). No big deal.  04:08, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * When I nominated it, a long time ago, the image was way darker, and it all looked much more spectacular. Someone made it brighter, and actually ruined it. . 15:53, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Here's a sxier image. -- 02:36, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * AMG YES. 04:08, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * YES! FTW! -- 19:35, November 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * CHEESE PUFFS!!!!! (and yes)-- 01:38, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Delisted. 02:38, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Wise Old Man
Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1

Reason: The image just isnt that good, the edges of the wise old man are jagged, the background looks bland, the rocks to the right are very poorly textured and the nearest rock looks like its levitating. Overall not an image of the standard of the other featured images.


 * Support As nominator. 09:05, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Oppose - I can see why you want this to be delisted, but I still find the image great. 09:11, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - As the standard of featured image rose, the original featured images began looking worse and worse. 10:14, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak support Per Evil Yanks. (rofl!) But Dionysius looks pretty good.  14:06, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - because it's been edited in Photoshop. 18:10, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Why not replace it? 03:36, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - per all 15:15, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination for delisting is successful. 14:09, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Baby blue dragon
Reason: This picture is not very detailed. The eyes are especially lacking, since they are just splotches of red. This image looks fuzzy from afar, and weird up close. It is not good enough to be a FIMG.

Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1


 * Support - As nominator. 14:11, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - It has good detail, but lacks everything else. It's an image from the first archive, where even images from the KB were featured... this is definitely not as good as FIMG's now. 14:38, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose - It has great detail, and I would certainly support it if it was nominated now. 14:46, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Liquid, and also it has bad transparency around the edges 16:48, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I don't like the head or feet, but the rest of the image looks great. 04:02, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - I think the details are there, and it's cute ^_^ 11:22, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - It's fuzzy. Per nom. 12:31, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - It's not high enough quality for FIMG. 12:33, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - It's just weird looking. 19:08, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - The edges are fuzzy, and contain artefacts. It's horns look odd, and it just isn't high-quality anymore compared to the other wonderful things we can now do with the Orb of oculus. 23:12, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - As per all 13:56, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Image will be delisted. 18:44, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Avatar of Creation
Reason: Very outdated and has been for a very long time. It is a bit choppy and does not focus on the topic of the article.

Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive1


 * Support - As nominator. 23:39, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * extreamly strong support - hp bars. prayers. players. hitsplats. hp bar showing threw stuff. a monster that looks llike its about 2 throw up on the camera. how much worse could it get? horrible, rotten image, worst featured image ever. EVER. 23:46, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Players, HP bars, hitsplats INSIDE the Avatar, urgh, make it stop! 05:35, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Massive support - Wasn't this requested for delisting a while back and eventually kept for some stupid reason? Featured images people? Hello? 14:01, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Support - Per others. 14:31, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I'll get around to nominating the better avatar image sometime. 23:21, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I just saw this on the main page to nominate this to delist. The bars and prayer annoy me. 23:25, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Farcaster. -- 00:48, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Ugly thing. --Coolnesse 20:12, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong support - Per all. 20:50, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Was wondering when this would be brought up too :D 21:00, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Massive Support - Thjis is hideous and should of been removed ages ago let alone allowed to be on here in the first place Per 3rd Age Farcaster Fury 133 12:15, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Fswe 13:38, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Closed - Neutral Nomination for delisting is successful. 01:38, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Gu'tanoth (2)


Reason: the ogre is in a strange position, the lava sticks out in a stupid looking way, and the fog is terrible. if people want featured images of ogres, we can get a much better one then this.

Original nomination: runescape:featured images/archive2#gu'tanoth


 * Support - as nom. 20:15, May 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - The ogre's "strange position" is simply the way of the ogres - brutality. I see nothing wrong with the lava, nor the fog, in my opinion. I like this cultural image. 23:12, May 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - This is tough. I wanted to nominate this for delisting myself for the fog and the lava and the cut-of things. But I see that Lil Diriz 77 is partly right. Still, it's very bland in the middle. 06:25, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Diriz 12:44, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Great image, other than the fog. 13:25, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * comment - if u want a image of ogres, can i get 1 thats hundreds of times better then this no problem.... and idk why we need 2 have a image of every race on rs, but as i said, if u want it.. *sigh* 14:59, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just adding a link, as this was already nominated for delisting. RuneScape:Featured images/archive-delisting  17:49, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * ok, i get it. this image is terrible, but since it has ogres in it it must stay- but cant we at least replace it with a better image? without the damn fog? 20:41, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per Lil diriz. 00:17, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Support - A terrible-looking image with a terrible angle. 17:46, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Massive Support - I'm sorry to argue like this, But have you seen the quality of some of the recent images that got declined recently for there being one small mishap such as an item not being centered or a small corner cut off by fog? This image is terrible, I don't know what Lil Diriz 77 is thinking, the fog just throws the dagger in the heart of this picture. The quality is ok, but has abysmal angles and terrible use of fog. 13:58, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Gigantic support (bigger than Gradius's support) - This is just a terrible image. Period. The quality is atrocious, and you cannot see the subject of the picture clearly at all. Definitely not FIMG-worthy. 23:22, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per diriz, but this is one of my fave images on the entire wiki. Perhaps it can be reshot at least? D: Coelacanth0794 00:54, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Extreme Strong oppose - Per Diriz, and this image is also scenery, so where's the problem? --Coolnesse 01:43, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Im just getting highly frustrated now... "Featured images are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article." FIMGs should contain quality and should, upon viewing, making the user feel the "Wow" factor. Basically, The user should be able to see an image, think "Wow!" and then take their time to read the article. Take a look at the archives, and I will guarantee you that atleast 70% of the images that have been declined within the last 6 months are of significant quality compared to this one. Some of those images got declined for having specific elements of the image being of poor standard. One thing I can think of is the fact that some subjects are cut off at the end of the picture, I can see an orge on the left hand side of this one being cut off. Then there is the fog, Take a look at some of the Daemonheim pictures that have been declined due to a little bit of fog. This picture's fog looks terrible, Its like having a white backdrop in the background. Finally, my third and final issue is the lack of a subject... The ogre who is meant to be the subject, doing an gorilla like pose, is almost at the end. I'm sorry to argue, but this image is awful, I don't know why exactly it should be kept, if you could clarify why, Then maybe... 12:49, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * same. i really am having a hard time believing this- i thought after so many wonderfull imagese where rejected for a small cut off or a bit of non symetricalness or something like that, this wouldnt stand a chance. we shouldnt judge the featured image on what it is of, but of how good an image it is. maby u like ogres, but, rather then support any image with ogres in it, we should ask our selves if we cannot get a better ogre image, or even if we need a ogre image at all. oh, and coolness, just cuz its scenery does not mean it should be a feature image. do u have any idea how many scenery images where rejected? 14:06, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * You should re-think your criticism. Don't you see how many images that have been ACCEPTED even though they have flaws? If this image has an extremely minor one, then I don't think it should be disposed of ASAP. Sometimes, you're into perfectionism too much. --Coolnesse 20:12, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Woah, Hang on... TINY?! flaws? I'm sorry, But EVERYTHING is wrong with this picture, And I will agree that some images have flaws, but that is why there is like 4 nominations for delisting going on at the moment? Face it, This image is TERRIBLE... 20:21, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I like it. --Coolnesse 20:32, May 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - Per Gradius. 14:23, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Per Gradius and 3rd age caster 10:22, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Enlarged - Up to the time that (a condition becomes true) the sixth day of the sixth month of the Gregorian calendar, the 10th year of the 3rd millennium/MMX/the common year that started on a Friday. -- 22:16, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh-- excuse me...?  12:43, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, Our English illiterate friend here means:


 * Extended - Deadline for the nomination extended until the 6th June 2010. 21:12, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I... see... sorta... 05:28, June 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose - It is quite a boring image but the ogres liven it up (at least). 08:06, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - this is getting outrageous. IMAGES NEED MORE THEN 1 POSITIVE TO PASS, ok? we cant just have every image with 1 nice feature be added.. 13:40, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose Support - Ewww...it just looks ugly.  00:11, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you think that, you should support... 05:46, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think he mixed it with teh nominations, I'll fix it for him. 19:25, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Closed - Nomination for delisting is unsuccessful; lack of consensus.  05:44, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Gu'tanoth (3)
Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive2

Previous RfDs: Nomination 1 and  Nominaton 2

Reason: I'm sorry to re-nominate it again, but it is seriously starting to annoy me that this image is STILL considered great quality? It has massive flaws for the love of god. First of all, the fog is horrible, very few images have fog make the image seem a better quality and this image certainly is not one. Secondly, some of the subjects of the image have been cut off the edge of the picture, for example, the ogre on the left. Finally, the angle is horrendous, there is nothing in the middle of the picture and makes it seem very bland. This image is terrible, lets face it. These 5 examples of images that recently failed in the voting of becoming a FIMG are clearly of significant quality in comparison to this one: These clearly dominant images failed for 1 very stupid or minor error, Gu'Tanoth has atleast 3 I could name off the top of my head, probably a few more if I took the time to open the image and look correctly... This image is awful and just should not be on the FIMG template.
 * Daemonheim boat failed due to not being special, and heavily weighted to one side. Gu'tanoth image faces the same problems.
 * Har'Lakk the Riftsplitter failed for stupid reasons because the demon had wings... No legitimate reason for failure.
 * Altar of Life failed just because the water looked slightly unrealistic. The pros clearly outweighed the cons in that picture.
 * Maggie failed due to there not being a clear subject in the centre of the picture, one of the problems I've highlighted for Gu'Tanoth
 * Odd Old Man's hideout failed due to the dull and dark colours.


 * Extremely strong support - As the nominator 07:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * Closed - A recent consensus has already shown that there is no consensus to delist this image, thus it is the community's decision not to delist the image at this point of time. Do not renominate this image without waiting for a certain amount of time to pass.  09:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)