RuneScape:Requests for adminship/9the Enigma9

9the Enigma9
I am 9the Enigma9 and I would like to self-nominate myself. Almost everyday, I monitor the recent changes. Often there is vandalism in which I revert and report to the CVU, then I'd have to wait for an Administrator to check the CVU and block the users I have added. Other times, vandals create spam pages in which I can do nothing about. This is one of my problems. If I were to recieve Administrator rights, it would be much swifter to revert and block the Vandals, and also delete any pages that be spam. I always try to assume good faith and try to look at it in the editor's pointof view. In other words, I occasionally add transparency to images, make HD images and animations into HD ones, and when there's no Vandalism at the moment, I improve edits people may make. If there are any opposes, I will see my flaw and try to fix it. Thank You. --  Enigma  Talk Contribs 00:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

''I, 9the Enigma9, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, --  Enigma''  Talk Contribs 00:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in? Mainly counter vandalism, but any thing else if needed.

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?I'd have to say counter vandalism because I've reported countless IPs and users, I guess "cleaning up the community"

'''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?''' There have been a few misunderstandings, all of which I resolved by taking a closer look at the situation

Discussion
Oppose - Well I do see you once in a while, but I don't think you read most policy. Since I'm a recent change browser, I see what most edits are done recently and I happened to see your signature advertising your RFA. This states that you may not advertise your rfa in your signature, talk pages, ingame, etc. I also remember how you reverted an edit by a fellow wikian on the Banshee page and without a good summary except for "grr." However, seeing as you did not used rollback, I suppose you did not think it was vandalism. Also, I think it is best to rack up your edits, you don't have as much edits as most people. Edits aren't everything, but it shows that you contribute to our articles often. I also think you should participate in the yew groves, I don't recall seeing you there at all. 01:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - I didn't catch the policy as the only category it is in is "Articles Under Construction" which isn't exactly a place I'd go to look for policies. I apologize and have removed the link. And that Banshee page edit was one of the few misunderstandings and that I had looked at it from a point of view that seemed the editor was vandalizing. That was over a month ago, though. I forgot why I put in "grr" and why I didn't use the rollback button. As for the Yew Grove comment, most of my contributions to it are in it's Archives, and I havn't visited it latley, which I will try to now make it part of my daily routine. -- 01:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Maybe if I see you a bit more active and participate yew groves, I'll change my vote to support. Other than that, I think all is satisfactory since you answered my questions. 07:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Neutral, for now - Haven't seen you really active. In editing, nor in discussing at eg the Yew Grove. Let's see how other users are thinking about you. If they have better arguements, I'll change my neutral.--. 06:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Very soft oppose - Per Powers38. Supirion1 07:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Neutral - Lots of anti-vandal work, which is great, as well of plenty of mainspace edits. Not much in the way of forum/community participation recently, but I see you have in the past, so I may well change to support in future if you contribute to discussions some more. 13:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Slight support - I have seen you doing a lot of anti-vandal work and participating in the R S Wikia clan chat, but other than the clan, I haven't seen you much in places such as the Yew Grove. Work on that, and my support will get stronger. 18:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - you seem like a decent person and you have done lots of anti-vandal work in the past; however, the attitude you showed in regards to integrity in the clan chat the other day was unacceptable in my opinion. Every sysop should have integrity, and saying "Integrity? I think I remember that.. I left it at the hotel" while bragging about uploading a scene from an illegally downloaded movie proves my point very well. 20:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - That is my own personal buisness. I should not have talked about it in the clan chat. But I have learned from that mistake. And of course I have integrity, I was obviously joking when I said "Integrity? I think I remember that... I left it at the hotel" - 22:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Bragging about it and not caring whether or not it was legal showed the way you behave sometimes. It's nothing personal, but there is a level of responsibility that I expect in all potential admins. 00:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)