User talk:Liquidhelium

Note: I dislike having a long talk page, since it increases the scrolling distance to get to my newest messages. Therefore, don't be surprised if conversations disappear into my black hole. Please see my FAQ before posting a question.

Sock puppets
What's wrong with [ this image]? -- 16:15, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Useless comments
Only because I love you, Kev Kev. See only a real bff would care enough to leave spam on talk pages. <33 18:16, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

second accounts and checkuser
There is NO policy prohibiting a second account, sysops that block these second accounts of users are misusing their tools. Running a checkuser would be pointless since he is not breaking any policies. Yes I know it has happened many times. And every sysop who has ever blocked for this reason it is in violation of our blocking policy. Period.-- 20:03, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Need help moving a page
Hi. Helm of neitiznot should be moved to Helm of Neitiznot, considering this is the in-game name, which has Neitiznot capitalized. The manual lists the item as "Helm of Neitiznot". http://www.runescape.com/kbase/guid/melee_quest_related_items. Could you delete the redirect so I/you could move the page please? Thanks. --Callofduty4 20:52, September 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * It is? I thought the game's manual would be correct, but obviously not. My bad. --Callofduty4 20:55, September 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * I see what you mean. I haven't played the game in some time now, next time I'll login and check :P --Callofduty4 21:01, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

I can't believe it's not my long titled section
No, all articles have to meet the standards of both the wiki and wiki post style guides. 21:20, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * You also said I should not stalk you with the info in your E-Mail address. Doesn't that philosophy conflict with the fact that you trace the IPs of those in the IRC? 22:53, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's still not right to do if the other user does not know everyone is able to access their IP from the IRC, which you have to assume is the case unless they tell you otherwise. 22:57, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wanted to mention that I found your comment on Forum:UotM rule well written, so I will reward you by leaving a comment in green text. It's better than other comments. 22:24, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's your Birthday? Congratulations! You are now one year closer to your  ULTIMATE END!!!  22:30, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Can I see the return and exchange policy for this please?

 * 1) No refunds.
 * 2) See 1.

-- 00:40, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why don't you like it? -- 00:43, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I cut my phone line. OLOLOL -- 00:47, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Nova
@@@@@@@@@-- 02:04, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Psycho Robot
Oh, thanks for clearing that up. I thought he was hated by everybody or something. 06:51, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Don't close threads in the middle of a discussion.
Just don't do it, especially when theres a massive conflict of intrest on your part, and when your not even in the discussion. Its just a dickish thing to do. 22:47, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * There was no consensus, just what I saw was a huge flame-war to be. I think it should simply be left as it is. 22:48, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * If he did it, that would be a conflict of interest also. Who says the goal is consensus? As long as its not hurting anything no reason to close. Who gives if it causes a massive headache, you weren't in the discussion, you wouldn't have the headache, nor would anyone because if they did they could simply leave. No need for you to barge in on something you have little/no part of at that point. If it was you who had the headache then fine, but as I said you were in it, you have no way of knowing if it will cause a headache. 
 * There isn't a deadline on threads, nor is there a limit on space. No reason to ever close threads, even when its obvious consensus will not be reached unless people stop posting. 22:54, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Honestly, 3AF, it was not going to pass. We fought the good fight, and now it's time to let it go. I'm still convinced we are right, but after all, so was the author of every other failed proposal. 23:16, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not saying it was, just saying closing threads in the middle of a discussion is a dickish move. 23:45, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * What ever happened to you saying that the use of the word dick is immature...? We just had a whole, drawn out discussion on the topic that you proposed . 00:20, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did say immature, though I really ment something more like unprofessional. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough. 00:39, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

rar
I told Ajr i was gonna vandle his userpage.

But I was hoping for him to revert it...

elflord, ur brave, i giv u tat liek my fancy writin aww liquid reverted D: 	aww hes gunno warn u nao 2 c i told u 	tat was fast ya
 * elflord	waits

Now I'll like my .10 second block with the reason "rar", if you will. 02:26, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

ur telling ME?
lolz... don't you think degen is kinda rude then? he just gets away with it bcus hes better bcus hes an admin? fine, ill start a desysop degen thread. 22:15, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think degen is acting more rude than me, although he doesn't say all caps, he does say things in a way what i consider rude ("Man, you have a serious problem." "your comment about me not being better is totally pointless", "HIS message to you was clear" "I better not see it again." "Your post on the RSOF makes the wiki user base look like a bunch of whining spoiled children" "I'll give you a day or so to get that done before I delete it if it isn't") 22:30, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, you should know degen can be quite rude... 22:34, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * You may not find "I'll give you a day or so to get that done before I delete it if it isn't" very rude, but it does violate RS:AEAE, as he kinda "forces me" to remove my name, like i'm his slave, while he could have done it himself if he was so annoyed by it. 13:56, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Got anything to say to that? i would like to have this thing clear. 16:21, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Charm log vandalism
Yes I did. 00:12, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Hedonism Bot
Are you going to do the same to User talk:Evilbot? 02:01, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea i probably shouldn't have done that, but I was pretty annoyed >_< 02:14, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I did it because it brought me hedonistic pleasure, sir. GOOD DAY TO YOU!!! 01:02, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Oasis
The sad part about this is that up til the present, Wikia and the old admins had a very good relationship. Now, however, every update is an attempt by Wikia to grab more control.-- 03:07, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Why I hate Oasis
User:Scimitar77 asked for a summary of everything I dislike about Oasis, so I wrote an open letter to Wikia that will be gone within a few minutes due to the volume of comments on the blog post. Because of this, I am going to post it on the talk page of a few users as to make writing it worth the lost sleep.

''I honestly can't believe that Wikia is doing this. Consider that the people that use the site, the same people who determine whether or not Wikia makes money, are actively protesting this terrible layout. Please explain why we need two columns of unused space to the sides of the screen, and then another unused column for the unsightly image attribution box, overly complex recent updates box, and an absolutely unencyclopedic popular blog posts widget that I am seeing for the first time on this page. If this was Facebook, I would not have a problem with this layout, but I am here to find information. Additionally, this is effectively stripping all wikis of their individuality. What was once a logo is now a simple phrase below the only resemblance of a logo on the page: the word "Wikia". Furthermore, you have disabled us from being able to remove some of the less desirable additions to the site via MediaWiki files. I admit that some, like the Lifestyle wikis, may benefit from this layout. This is not the case for Wikia Gaming, which I predict will whither and die from being so effectively branded like a cow. I understand demanding Monaco back is an irrational request at this point, but I ask you revert to the previous version of the Terms of Use. Wiki communities know what is best for their site, and a one-size-fits-all system is not that.''

''The most pointless addition here is the image attribution below each image. When I first saw the calendar image on this page, my eyes were instantly drawn to the subtitle “Added by Sannse.” I don’t care who uploaded it. This will ultimately plaster the names of active image contributors all over the mainspace, creating a sense of superiority that is completely unwiki-like. There’s also the chance that I have mistaken this for a subtitle you added yourself, but I gave up looking for the view source button (another issue I am having with Oasis, you can’t always find everything). There is one final problem I am going to mention; there is no emphasis on content here. The new skin puts emphasis on the following in descending order: Wikia, the individual, the community, and the content. Notice that this is the exact opposite of the way things are supposed to be. The exact opposite. Because Wikia’s original quality of customer service was so great, I forgave all the terrible updates you have thrown at us over the years. You have finally ignored us to the point that I cannot forgive these updates anymore, and this fundamental transformation of what Wikia originally stood for is unforgivable.''

It's not my best work, but it's good enough.

01:41, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Don't care. If I spent two hours on it (that's how much I spend on the average paper), then I might consider that. 01:49, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Eye Wiki
Liek mah logo? -- 21:53, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

New group
May I be a "custodian"? 02:34, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

I was under the impression that  would be applied to the Custodian group rights and removed from the rollback to be that, and only that,. Am I wrong? It's no big deal, but just wondering. 02:43, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

New usergroup
"Maintenance" sounded weird on when you put it on RS:ADMIN, didn't it? 02:42, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate closure of thread
I do not believe you correctly determined consensus on Forum:Add "movefile" right to Rollback. I believe there was appropriate consensus to make it more than 50 file edits. 02:43, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Then why did you close the thread? If you aren't going to read it, don't close it.  I think it should be at least 200 as they are pretty easy to obtain.  There was easily consensus for more than 50, at least 100-150 if not 200.   02:48, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, gracious sir!  22:27, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

It only has to stay open for a week if you are using RS:SNOW as your reasoning to close it. As the subject matter was already taken care of, RS:SNOW didn't come into play, and thus there was no 1 week rule. 00:34, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Add "movefile" right to Rollback
Now that that threads been closed, there a few questions I have. Most importantly, how are users going to gain "Custodian" privileges, just asking a bureaucrat? Or will a Requests for rollback style page be set up? Also, I presume that the entry requirements confusion has been cleared up, but if not... 03:09, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I found the page. 03:58, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Sitenotice
You left a ~ on the sitenotice when you were signing <~--Liquidhelium October 2, 2010-->  -  16:03, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Sitenotice
You fail -- 16:03, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * And why do we want Courier New? -- 16:53, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * k -- 17:04, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * ..srsly? -- 22:40, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * lulz -- 22:45, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

PSST.
I want you to have a look at this. 22:34, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Hi!

I get little dung xp with 24 prestige,but why?

i got 1300 xp for prestige on floor 1, and only 900 on floor 10!! with 24 prestige both!! but why?

can some1 answer that??

RE:Logo and skin
For the logo, we're currently using the logo (with slight modifications due to size). As for the theme, the default "Wikia" theme ("Oasis") resembles Sapphire the most. Even though there's also a "Sapphire" theme available, it has an ugly background and doesn't look very alike. So I think the best option would be the "Oasis" theme which is default, and we set up some kind of submissions page or so. 15:14, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You can change the background (oasis grey-ish colour is gross looking), go to my wiki in the new skin to see what I mean. 00:56, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

ummmmmmmm
wut? -- 15:43, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Archive
NOU -- 19:44, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Signature policy
It was a joke, mainly based on what liiiiiiii said. 00:41, October 4, 2010 (UTC)