User talk:Jalepeno Cornbread

My previous talk is now archived. mongoose xr75
 * One
 * Two
 * Three

Fremennik boots
I'm sure that the boots don't have to be worn, since I use them to teleport to Relleka every day to collect my Miscellania earnings. 18:07, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, the boots are in my inventory. I still have to take the boots along, since I have to operate them. 18:10, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Dahmaroc statue
Can you create this? I don't much about the shattered heart stuff so I can't. 00:14, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:AOTM votes
I know, but now it looks... Strange. They didn't even say "Support"... 14:06, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Warning
Please see here, as you have not seen quite the whole story here. Also, I am not a troll and am well aware of your policies. I'm sorry if I lost my "cool", but this is rather frustrating. However, if you look you will find that I am not insulting or trolling other users, so the warning is undeserved. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 02:49, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I am not just censoring out all of the opposition. I do believe that I have... 5 supports in the archive as well? Ajraddatz Talk 02:52, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * It comes down to this. I am trying to benefit this wiki, can that be argued? No. I am willing to dedicate valuable resources into making RS wiki a better place. Can this be argued? No. Also, why is it that I am always talking to walls here? Ajraddatz Talk 02:54, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

---Above are the comments he removed, disallowed so adding back-Degenret01 03:29, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

I apologize, and just deleted my points. This thing is really bothering me, but that is no excuse for me to lose my head. Also, please just let me remove my honestly pointless comments without comment. Thanks, Ajraddatz Talk 03:02, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * To be fair to you as well, I am not new here. I am fully aware of the policies, and I violated that one mainly as a result of my agitated state. I am sorry, and can assure you that it won't happen again. Ajraddatz Talk 04:12, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your turn again
Kk, I will try to not make it anoter Morian article if possible since he seems to have had the monolopy of AOTM's recently.~ 09:01, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Archived thread
Thanks for clearing that up. 07:49, March 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oya, this seemed kinda cool to me :D 08:22, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Template
This template annoys me, for some reason. Do you think it could be deleted/moved to a better title? -- 14:17, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

?
who are you? 01:18, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Mining
Noob. You never logged on. 11:25, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * OOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG. You better not get 99 mining without me! 08:44, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I waited the whole day yesterday! You told me I better be on for like normal time and I was! But you were never on! :( 08:49, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Seeds
I know you probably put a lot of time into deleting the growing cycle info on the Seeds page, but I think you deleted lots of extremely useful info. I think it would be worth discussing on the page's talk page and maybe involve more people. Can we do that? --Saftzie 06:20, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Farming xp
Hi, Degen, I got 316,618 farming xp in 15 minutes today, all with the 2.7x bonus. Not bad. That's like 21,107 a minute. 15:19, March 12, 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm training herblore now. I've made 108,653 xp in a little over an hour at 2.5x and 2.3x bonuses. I way underestimated the xp I'd get from the pots, though. I farmed and saved from drops about 2k herbs—thinking that's what I'd need for level 72—and got the level after using up maybe half of them. 01:58, March 13, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, wait. I've gotten 217,306 total xp from the herblore so far. That 108k is just the bonus xp. 02:09, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

CAM
I think that a template should be made similar to Template:Previous rfd-no consensus should be made to be placed on the talkpages of untagged AOTMs. I am horrible at designing things like this so I can't do it. 06:29, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that untagged template is a good way of indicating the article's former glory and what needs to be done to recrown it, making people aware of RS:CAM also. For ones that didn't reach consensus, it is up to you. Sincell articles degrade over time, a lack of consensus necesserally wont mean that it is unlikely that it will achieve consensus, yet on the flipside there are no real downsides.  07:39, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Sitenotice
This will probably work better for ya =P

Also, if you cpould remove the blinking, that would be awesome. It actually hurts -- 01:42, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Trust me, I don't know much either. Trial and error is a win =] -- 01:49, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Edit reports
I happen to be on, so... The template userinfo is what has the edit report link, it wasn't specifically added to rfas. 07:55, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hey Degen, if I remember correctly, there wasn't a discussion to include it, but anyway, the template is Template:Userinfo. If you want to revert it to the previous version without the Edit report button, this is the revision you would save it to. 07:56, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the links and info, that inclusion stuff makes my head start to split.--Degenret01 09:08, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't the Previous FA template be placed on the talkpage, rather than the article itself? 13:57, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, I didn't have any further opinion because your reasoning made sense, so there wasn't much to say. The rules regarding signatures can be found at Template:Signatures although strangely enough, they can't be found in RuneScape:Signatures. 08:46, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

sorry
just got a bit angry that all =), wont happen again -- 09:34, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Feeding the trolls
Hello. First of all, please explain yourself. I do not feed the trolls, and am well aware of Wikia's general guidelines. I am a user who reverts vandalism globally; I know what I am doing. That being said, what do you mean? Ajraddatz Talk 23:10, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry. However, read a bit more and you will find that what I was saying is that the vandalism would be undone within seconds. That was the point of it. Also, that wasn't a troll, just a normal good faith user. Please understand that I am not a troll, and stop treating me as such. Also, if you would honestly give the same warning to a very experienced editor here, then you should read the policy more carefully (with all due respect). Ajraddatz Talk 23:26, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Just curious
''Neutral - You do a lot of good work, yet I am hesitant to support this. Some times you have reported vandals for very minor things that a warning is sufficient for. And while I have stressed that anti-vandal work is not everything, when done at all it must be done correctly. If every IP you reported was blocked then some of those would have been too harsh IMO.--Degenret01 15:54, March 20, 2010 (UTC)''

You're referring to the RS:CVU, which was originally meant not so much for reporting vandals to be blocked, but for users to notify admins of problem users (basically meant as a double check system after the user took actions they felt necessary). Now I'm more than willing to admit that I've been disconnected for the last few months from the community due to personal reasons/illness/ etc., however, what is the current mentality behind the CVU's role in counter vandalism? (I'm of course not questioning your opinion on that user's adminship request, hence the reason I'm asking this via talk rather than cluttering up Scizor's RfA) :).-- 16:04, March 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I've been worried for some time that the meaning of many of our projects/policies/precedents have become gargled over time. The CVU is currently the worst example of this and a notice on the page could do volumes I believe. One more thing on a massive to do list 'round here in terms of re/defining outdate elements of this wiki.-- 16:54, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Bonzi sysop tools
I'm hoping to have the last item on my to do list cleared up before that mess bubbles back up.

''Just to clear up a question a few of us have had, if he comes back and wants the tools back he gets them? Unless there is a YG thread with a consensus that he will not be re-granted them without passing another RFA? We think this is the case but are wondering if we need that discussion or not.''

Technically, it's up to the bureaucrat's discretion whom he asks. That's why I am trying to get through those things on my list, we need to define in clearer terms a set of guidelines for 'good standing'. (I would refuse based on his final actions consisting of unnecessary wheel warring.)

''Also, if there were a thread of that nature would you mind being quoted? Your words are often more direct and clear than ones I use, but I wouldn't want to quote you without your permission.''

Of course you have my permission. In a situation such as that, I certainly make sure not to mince words, (though I was biting my tongue :/).

Good standing is currently a small loop whole that needs to be more defined, it's how Puremexican got his powers back when he should not of.-- 16:54, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Edit report
Oh, I just realized where the edit report for Template:Userinfo went. How is it detrimental as a tool? I don't see instances of people getting caught up over numbers. 18:31, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * On a current Rfa there are some examples of pointing out how often this that or the other template is used and such but if one looks at the actual edits they can learn a lot more, and should. Rfas and people are about what they do, not the numbers the generate. Some people can have a hundred reports to the CVU but they may all be nonsense, where another may have 20 good reports. That 20 beats the 100. Remving the report will force our people to hopefully examine the contribs themselves, and not be lazy and look at a report of numbers that doesn't say anything about the quality of a persons edits.--Degenret01 18:45, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Er, I guess that would be me, on Stelercus's RfA. I have been "stalking" the CVU for quite a while, so I know what the reports are like. I have seen Stelercus report people for very minor things, for example inserting I LIKE PIE into an article. The numbers are just backup for my observations, but I only included the numbers since they were hard evidence. Personally, I only try to report vandals that either vandalize more than once or do something quite severe. But, is it possible for someone to learn that without knowing me? I don't think so. While the number is not as important as the quality, there is a good chance that a high number corresponds to at least decent quality. To truly discern quality is a very time consuming process, so personally I favor a one-stop-shop that provides us with the information we need without taking up excessive amounts of our time. That's just my 2 cents. 18:52, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

RE:RFA Question
And I answered that question, unaware that I was answering it. 00:51, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:minor edits pl0x?
Sorry about that i never have it turned on but I'm done with that I'm just going to update the Smiley page next but hey that's not going to clog the resent changes  04:49, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Previous featured articles.
I moved the template that you made for them to the top of the talk page. Some of those pages already have 2 boxes-thingys at the top, and it was really off-putting having three. 11:24, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good idea. I might do that now. 05:19, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Thanks!
But my siggy seems to work anyway. Thanks for the notice.User:Angel's fire 19:19, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, er how do I do that? ''' The Fire of the Angels Pester me! ''' 19:31, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Is this right now?
It should work.

re: mark edits minor please
Done. Thanks for the advice. Aka Edge 02:39, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

My epic username?
heres the link :P Тαcαωч