RuneScape:Requests for merging

This is the page for discussions about merging different pages.

Gnome Liaison Officer
Though this page is tagged as a stub, I can't see that any more information could possibly be added to it. I suggest that what is here be merged into G.L.O. Caranock and this page be turned into a redirect to that article. If another G.L.O. is ever named by the gnomes in the future, this could be reversed... JalYt-Mej-Wynde 14:59, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I oppose merging them, they are not the same thing. Add some info about caranock here, saying that he/she is the only known member, and remove the stub tag. 15:01, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have added some information about GLO Caranock. I also oppose merging. 07:27, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Maximising Dungeoneering experience guide
Should be merged, because the goal of a skill guide should be (or at least part of it should be) a way to maximize experience. 15:14, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

I say No User:Chiro9
 * You must provide a reason, otherwise you're just wasting space/time. 01:49, May 17, 2010 (UTC)

I say Yes for the merge, the information in this article is identical to what is found in the training guides, just a generalised version for both F2P and P2P.Anincent 09:29, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

It refers to maximum experience in both F2P and P2P, so since combining all 3 articles seems a bit messy and confusing for readers, my vote is No.Am643602 01:43, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * It wouldn't be combining all 3. It would be adding this information into both the F2P and P2P guides to show maximum experience there. 01:49, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Am643602, this article is already a combinination of all three articles (since it is a combination of F2P, P2P and naturally itself), your comment that such an article would be "messy and confusing" suggests that your vote should be a Yes on the removal of this article instead of a No.Anincent 11:22, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - If you compare the p2p and f2p guides, the f2p one is far better, and already has pretty much all of the information contained here. I think that this guide in and of itself is redundant, and that the p2p guide should simply be worked on. If that means simply transferring the information that's fine. 16:32, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

I say no- The section for maximising experience goes into more detail with things that the Pay to Play guide does not.{[Jikkir]} 21:23, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes - realized everything above was for it. 16:32, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

I say yes, maximising exp is what a training guide is for, isn't it? Alandar995 17:36, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

I also agree; I read the title amongst "recently edited" and I immediate thought about the merge. Snegenad 07:53, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

I think an article that deals with the content of this one needs to exist, to make it clear how to get the best experience per floor. Frankly, I feel that this should be dealt with on the main Dungeoneering article, which currently lacks specific information about the penalties and benefits of modifiers, as well as the calculations behind the base experience. Also, I don't really understand the party guide, that seems more redundant than this one, and also suited for the main article. Ergori 05:24, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Wolf (level 14)
This seems like overkill to have every wolf on its own separate page... I am not sure if I even need to bother adding the merge template, though I felt I should since the pages are so old. 06:41, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, some things should be separate. Look at Skeleton. There are many different types of skeletons, levels/drops/looks, yet they are all on the same page. Also, other fansites, like tip.it, have separate pages for different levels. I'm not saying that every level should have its own page, just that some things should. Looking at the wolf pages, I think they can be safely merged, as they all drop the same stuff ,just not big wolf or white wolf, as those have different names ingame. 06:47, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Merge - just the ones that are only called "wolf" in-game. There are few enough types that they could all be on one page. Plus, there are a few types that have different names, "big wolf", "dire wolf" etc that would stay seperate so that would keep the page from getting too clogged up. Right now it's very confusing as to what is what. 21:25, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Proposal - I might go into more detail on the merge. Only the following articles should be merged imo: 02:51, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wolf (11)
 * Wolf (14)
 * Wolf (25)
 * Wolf (38)
 * Wolf (64)
 * I agree with all of those except Wolf (38), it redirects to White Wolf, so it probably is differently named ingame. 03:14, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that. Changed 03:15, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Merge all - Per Evil Yanks. --Coolnesse 15:20, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Merge all Chiro9

Merge - Merging all of them but the level 38 because of the redirection to White Wolf seems much more logical than wasting file space on a different page for all of them.Boxian77 15:01, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Don't Merge - I don't think it would be correct due to the appearance, drops, and location. 71.199.121.129 01:57, June 15, 2010 (UTC)Update222

The skeletons are that way, and they got fit into one page.Boxian77 13:44, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

I say merge. Unless, there is going to be a huge Wikia project, and every creature that shares the same name, but different combat level will have its own page, merge all the Wolf pages together.

Zenevivia (monster)
Yes, yes, I know that there is a difference between an NPC that you fight and an NPC that you talk to, but really, the main Zenevivia article is short enough that they can be merged into one. Zenevivia, outside the boss fight, doesn't really do anything except talk to you in a single appearance at the begginging of the quest. Having seperate articles isn't that necessary. -- 03:39, July 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree. The other instance of this, Nomad, is only done so because the nomad has a very important role before the quest in which he is fought. That is not the case with Zenevivia. 03:45, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Merge. Even in the quest, Zenevivia is sometimes an NPC (like at the barn) and sometimes a monster (like at Dionysius's stolen house). Having one article will all the info will be more useful to players. The article could make clear when Zinny is an NPC and when she is a monster. Inelcirc 23:38, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Why merge? Mark ( talk ) 20:09, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Because Zenevivia's role before the quest is very minor. And not really worth having an entire article devoted to that one aspect. 19:11, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Could we get some closure on this? It's been a while since there has been a comment on it... -- 18:00, August 7, 2010 (UTC)