User talk:Soldier 1033

Leave a message &darr;

Spam
Mmkkk I get it now! 05:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Curse you and your talk page stalking ways! 05:01, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, what about talk page stalking? 05:02, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh nothing..*trips Ajr and Powers on their way out the door* ^^ 05:05, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * This spam was so insincere it made me cry. You are not a spammer sir. You are a grumpy guy. When you spam out of spite instead of out of sheer delight in the mayhem, you make flowers wilt and fruit go bad. :c 05:14, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am now a sad panda. Do not forget the nice things I did for you, sir!  05:17, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha! You fool! I reread that nomination hoping to find a spelling mistake to nag you with, but you said I undo edits instead of rolling back to assume good faith when in fact... the only reason I undid... was because I hadn't bothered to request rollback yet! if I had it, I'd have rolled back everything! Your trust was misplaced, and your hopes and dreams shall go unfulfilled! 05:23, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're fired, son. Get out of my house! 05:24, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your signature is so small. I can hardly read it. *squints* you should make it, like, 3x bigger. 05:26, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe your eyes are just small. Muahahahaha! 05:29, July 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Funny how easy that is to get rid of without violating DDD  05:45, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I counter with RS:GTS! 05:51, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh touché, good sir! I was almost ready to accept defeat, but then I hired the guy that trained Rocky and he told me to keep on going no matter how hard I get hit. So, with that, I am counterattacking with RS:UCS! It's super effective! 05:53, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't feed me. The only winning move is not to play. 05:58, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I have a better idea. Click here for free pr0nz!!! 06:00, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Eww! No one likes that kind of pr0nz! Er, sorry. I'm not here to judge anyone, not even a pervert like you. 06:07, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, were you around when Mr. Vandal bot came? 06:09, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was still congealing in the viscous genetic solvent that people like me are spawned in. 06:12, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I do that for the sake of consistency! 18:49, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I meant consistency within my signature! If I uses span formatting, I might as well use span formatting for everything after all! who cares if it 12 extra characters?! 19:32, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Did I?
 * http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/9880/drevil.gif
 * 21:42, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * You're trying to strongarm me into voting! Did you ever consider that I could still be undecided?! *is hurt* :c 21:44, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Wikiclean
Epic -- 00:12, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd like to place an order for a wikiclean. 00:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Noes, it was done by tlul, not me. He was calling me a noob. *hides in closet* 00:33, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it a real extension? What does it do? 01:06, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs to be one. Most of these edits are filthy. Especially this one. 01:47, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Request for reopening
Hey Andrew, I'm requesting the reopening of Forum:Change DBAN to DBAD for the following reasons:
 * The thread was open for approximately a week.
 * Consensus was not overwhelming; while many of the early voters supported the change, many of the later ones did not. It seems to me, as a neutral observer (and one who supported the change), that most of the early supporters were not necessarily supporting changing to DBAD, but more affirming that DBAN was unacceptable.
 * The closer (yourself) was not neutral during the discussion, and you were the most fervent supporter of the change. While it is not a true "requirement" for the closing sysop to remain neutral during the course of the discussion, it may lead some to believe there is a conflict of interest.
 * The premature closure of the thread will inevitably lead to more threads on the matter (already, one has sprung up.)

Thank you for the consideration,

18:37, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you.  00:39, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

I thought I should mention that it wasn't a good idea to have you close the discussion. Closing it as a biased party, you're not protecting the integrity of community consensus. Some of the opposers will no doubt believe that you are abusing the tools you are given as a sysop. 19:58, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you feel that way, but that doesn't change the fact that it was going around in circles and need to be closed. Regardless of who closed it, it needed to be closed. 01:27, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * If it needed to be closed, get a neutral admin to do it. Would you like it if I closed Forum:No full protection for userpages as successful, while having supported it myself?

Re:Thank you for closing that
Not a problem. The re-hashing of previously addressed issues in the YG drives me crazy; I couldn't stand to leave that one open. -- 01:32, July 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * My thread's topic wasnt about dick or noob, it was about removing the essay all together. I dont care if the other thing had 500 supporters to one, my thread was about a different issue. Is this not clear?


 * regarding assumptions, halo clearly said on the other thread that he intrepreted "dick" to mean "harsh trolling". At no point am i claiming that that other thread wasn't going to pass, nor am i claiming theres anything wrong with it passing. As i said this is a seporate issue. 01:41, July 8, 2010 (UTC)