User talk:Suppa chuppa/Archive 2

Brains
Isn't it funny when I ninja him? 07:58, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * I know 07:59, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * nou 08:00, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, the page looks so weird when it's empty. 08:04, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * {| class="collapsible collapsed"

! WARNING: Inappropriate/Potentially offensive content Now it's not empty. 08:07, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/The_sacrifice_louis_1280_wp.jpg
 * }
 * }
 * LOL. Nope, not anymore. 08:08, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * And that's why Louis is the best.-- 22:46, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Deleting things
Please explain why you deleted those image. For example Revenant demon fight.png wasn't unnecessary at all. It shows players fighting a revenant AND the awesome melee attack animation. Same for the others.

Deleting things
Please explain why you deleted those image. For example Revenant demon fight.png wasn't unnecessary at all. It shows players fighting a revenant AND the awesome melee attack animation. Same for the others. 13:25, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

File:JadMonsterExamine.png
Hey, you recently deleted File:JadMonsterExamine.png, listing it as a successful RfD. It wasn't actually a successful RfD, as the verdict reached was that the image would be saved for the Monster Examine page. 20:07, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Drops
found a new item that tzhaar-xil drops its black knifes, they drop 9 at a time and its a very rare drop , you should edit the page.

Re:Bork
Neither of those safespots depicts the trapping of the ork legions or fighting with melee. In addition, neither has an image of Surok in it. About the size, it's as far as fixed screen goes. Nevertheless I think that you can see everything quite good, even if it's a bit busy. 09:02, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  09:05, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * So now it's awesome?!  09:08, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Riiiiiiiiiight.... XD  09:10, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Old images
I used to help the owner of a Runescape guide site, which has since been taken offline. I have many old pictures of npc's on my hard drive that I recently came across. If your wondering, none of these were taken from private servers (as far as I can remember).

slep
do it nao, 08:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Why was this trivia removed?
On Elemental Workshop IV, you removed a piece of trivia that read "Familiars that are in the Chaos room with you will begin to follow Da-vi while it is executing commands.", but left the picture that complimented it. Typo, or was it false? It seemed true as far as I witnessed... Eevables 12:13, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Oh wow I swear I didn't notice that infobox. Thanks for letting me know. Was trying to help. :D

Torva Armor
I heard it was worth 5B "on the street". (< 19:54, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah.. X_X 20:00, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Iiii dunno. ^-^ I've been cleaning all day so I've been in and out. I was on earlier. ;3= 20:08, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

I like how the amount of people who undo your edits has significantly increased recently.. >;P 19:57, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * People want dey trivia dawg. 22:33, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

RS:DDD lets you remove welcome templates
06:08, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Shadow silk hood
You seem to have reverted my SSH image because "you didn't see any improvements". Theres comments for a reason. I stated that there was no lighting detail in my version, and yet you still reverted it. If it was a mistake, I apologize. Next time read and compare before you revert an image. Thats the reason I created the LD template. Thanks! 01:59, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Trivia deletions
I suppose it's all subjective. I had to search for a bit, it was hidden in the depths of the wiki, but there is actually a policy for trivia: what to exclude, what to include, and how to phrase it, at RS:TRIVIA. I've bookmarked it for future reference because quite a lot of trivia sections I've seen do seem to contravene them to a degree.

After reading the policy I think that the trivia "This is the first quest to have given dungeoneering experience as a reward" falls under the category of being Notable (Either important, has a large effect on RuneScape and it's players, or a well-known fact). Although it can be inferred from the Quest Experience Rewards page, it is not explicitly stated there and besides, the Repeating Information guideline only covers repeated information within the article, not across multiple articles.

Also, you restored the trivia about the bug relating to the picture, but not any others. The one about multiple players in the POH helping with the combat should especially stay if the remining one does as there is a perfectly useable picture in the quest's talk page that could be used as proof of the bug (once certain words have been censored). However, from the policy on bugs in trivia, it states that "They should have their own Bugs/glitches sub-section. Regarding bugs, only notable bugs which have affected a moderate to large number of RuneScape players should be put down.". This presents two issues: Firstly, there should be a separate section for bugs and glitches, which I have never noticed in any article. Bugs seem to be mixed in with the trivia in pretty much every article I've seen, which only reinforces the practice of putting them in there. Secondly, how does one judge what "moderate to large" means? The cutoff would lie somewhere between affecting one person and demanding a rollback of all accounts, so it's very subjective.

From now on, I will be changing trivia according to the policy and adding the comment "Not in line with Trivia policy. Please read http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/RS:TRIVIA" because I believe that many of these edits that are against policy are being done by those who do not know better, as was the case with me. I hope you will join me in doing so, as educating people as to what the rules are helps reduce future breaches of the rules and prevents what I call "edit tennis".

I will also be separating bugs out into their own section whenever I edit a trivia section, with a similar edit description to show it is being done to comply with RSW policy. I don't have the time to go through every page with trivia on it - I'd need to give my job up for a month to do that, I suspect.

The one problem I don't think I have the right to address without some sort of consensus is where the cutoff is regarding the inclusion of bugs. I'll be looking into that. I'm more a casual editor who changes things that are inaccurate or adds things that are missing, and I don't usually get involved in any wider discussions or issues, but I think this warrants me trying to find out how to start doing that.

23:00, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

deleet
Delete the remaining revert at File:Brackish blade equipped.png too please. It looks a bit strange to have a revert to a nonexistent version 21:43, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Dude
The Bronze Dragons drop the dragon dagger, stop removing the drop please.

I can understand that, but the Dragon Dagger(s) are in the Ring of Wealth section of the Rare Drop Table and I wasn't wearing one when I received the drop.

If the drop is received without the R.O.W. wouldn't that make the drop just a normal drop from the dragons?

.
Nao. 07:08, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm in bed if that counts. <.< 07:11, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * ^-^ I'm just kidding you know lol. 07:14, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

lol
Some things are worse than a lot of trivia below a page. That is, a page filled with trivia, abbreviations (G.E.) and more shat all around it. -3861 . GF, glitchlovers! 16:59, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Favicon
Can't see it because it was meant to be the File:Wiki-wordmark.png logo but degen had problems with it. I believe the pharos wanted File:Cabbage Detail.png to be the icon. But yea, doesn't really matter. 11:14, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Re: RSHiscores
The problem with RSHiscores it is timing out, in direct and local testing it works fine, so I suspect something in Wikia's environment that I haven't yet figured out. However, a while ago I did send a JavaScript-based solution for Quarenon to add to the new calculator system that would make RSHiscores unneeded. - 22:54, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Counter Vandalism Unit
They might think it is fun, but as stated on the CVU page amongst things to report: "Posting offensive material, whether it be images or words."

But I have to admit, I didn't have a chance to read that as I was directed directly to the reporting section as I explained here. I wasn't after a block as the user has a lot of good edits as well, but just wanted the nonsense to stop. 23:44, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
Wanted to apologize because I thought someone else had vandalized the revenant orks page, so I changed it. Then after you changed it I found that they actually do drop rings of wealth. Sorry.

RE:Trivia deletions
To clarify what I mean, I'll be reverting any trivia that is against policy, and putting that comment in the summary box. If they repeat it, I'll do the same and put Template:Trivia_notice on their user page. Any bugs listed I'll separate out into a new section as per policy.

Also, I've had a go at improving the current policy in my sandbox at User:Magma2050/Sandbox. I've put a proposal up on the Yew Grove (It says this is where policy change proposals should be raised) so it can be discussed.

14:52, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re
Cool. 20:50, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Userpage
Sorry, I couldn't resist when I saw your vandal counter. I'll let you vandalize my page if you want. 02:45, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Email
I had, I am trying to work on a method to bring it up between my jobs and sleep. Sorry for not getting back to you. =( 23:23, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Remove Glitch?
Why did you remove it? could you add it to the gallery please?

some "fool" (being politically correct) deleted my origional pic and added his own instead >.>

FYI this was the origional:

MEEP 19:03, April 5, 2011 (UTC)MEEP

RE: Clan Chat rename
Clan Chat hasn't fully been re-named to "Friends Chat". However, the tool-tip displayed over the clan chat tab says "Friends Chat". Also, after entering a clan chat it will say "now talking in friends chat channel [chat name]" and whenever changing your clan chat ranks it will say "changes will take effect on your friends chat in the next 60 seconds". Maybe it's not quite enough, but it will be by next week. I just though it might be good to change it now so that any changes can be made before it is completely changed.


 * Fairly stupidly commented without logging in. Sorry Sundays211 07:35, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Mind litter.png
Ummm, as I see it, no reason was given at all. "Does not meet the criteria" isn't a reason, which is why I wanted one. For all I knew, the image was too small, in which case my appropriate response would surely be to make sure it was slightly bigger, and upload it again... I didn't want any "further" reason, just simply some reason so I could work from there. Anyway...

Is the userbox legitimate? Apparently. Would it look better with an image, rather than text? I kinda think so. I uploaded the image to imageshack first, but couldn't get it to work from there. So...

Now what? -- 15:37, April 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Does not meet the criteria" is a judgement, it is (presumably?) based on a reason, possibly "fake images are disallowed", though I still have no idea what not to do in the future.


 * I love the qualifications "fairly" and "should". I did actually try to make the image work from imageshack. The userbox doesn't seem to be set up to work that way, and I wasn't going to mess with how a well-established userbox works. -- 08:03, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

previously rejected conditions
The archives you added failed to meet established criteria. Notably, the weight of the arguments of those on the alternate viewpoint. The number of times a proposal fails is only one half, and the lesser half, of the established conditions.--Degenret01 23:28, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * You must ignore every time people oppose it based on legality because that is not proven. That eliminates much of the opposition. It does not meet criteria, period. Please undo your edit. --Degenret01 06:17, April 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, is this directed at me? It's not on my own Talk page, it's under a new heading, it refers to "archives". In addition to which it uses some sort of language which I might have understood if I had studied philosophy, or then again maybe not.


 * I get the distinct impression of someone "laying down the law", rather than trying to be helpful. Sure, I'm not demanding helpfulness. You don't "need to give another reason", need to be helpful or need to do anything else for me either.


 * I probably will revert my edit as I can't come up with a satisfying alternative. I'm spending too much effort trying to figure out how to fit in with the Wikia. I do like Magma2050's thinking, but can't help but feel it's a bit too "deep". -- 08:07, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Abusefilter
is borked 18:11, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

No new information
It isn't that there wasn't any new information or that the case presented doesn't have potential to become the legal support that they're looking for. When a ruling is made, the case can be legitimately discussed. If anything, discussion of not crystal should have been added to the list; not the RSMV in general. Leftiness 00:13, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Undone edit
I was wondering what was wrong with taking off Gaz's signature when he probably didn't mean to sign after the list of previous threads? 04:21, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

N-GK's back
There IS a reason, some things you cannot see from the front, e.g. the tentacles. 12:48, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Though sarcasm, I agree, but everybody would delete everything straight away so there's no point. With gigantic things such as Khighorahk (or something), there IS a point. 19:24, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Filter
Oh noez, u have mai IP. -- 22:46, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, its very handy for sure. --

bob shirts
I just got a bob shirt from a treasure trail and it says Bob shirt (pink), not purple.

Trivia
Why did you remove the whole page (I assume you did becuase you are the last editor)? --Atheist723 07:05, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Psst
I thought you'd be asleep, go to bed. ):< 07:12, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Omg! That movie was the last scary movie I ever saw. I vowed to never watch another scary movie again (I was like 9? <.<). So freaking creepy... 07:14, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't watch Saw movies... <-- is a fainter, and the bloodcurling screaming is.. disturbing. 07:18, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yus ^-^ 07:20, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Idk <.< ^-^ >.> Watching TV on my computer lol. There was a bug on the ground earlier and it scurred me so I put a cup over it, now I'm all creeped out and don't want to get up. >.< 07:26, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * LoL yeah. O_o Psh you're a guy you should be manly enough to not use a cup. >:P 07:37, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ewwww. O_O Okies going to bed, nite nite. (:

Moar filter
Just a FYI, we need to be very careful with changes to filter 3, especially with edits that trip the filter now being disallowed. Make sure to check all words using the "words containing" search on http://www.allwords.com/ so that we don't have any false positives. If you want to add a word (ass, for example) that is included within many other words, it needs to be added to the second regex (containing  lookarounds to discard results within words) to make sure there are no issues. I also always double check my regex with http://gskinner.com/RegExr/, which is good for weeding out careless errors before adding the changes. I'm sure you figured out/know most of this already, but I figured I would share anyway -- 18:52, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem -- 18:56, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Account
is my account guna get banned or me banned from rs wiki

but if i do vandalize pages,

would it be an account ban

or an ip ban for rs wiki

kk wel im sry and i wnt do it again :P

Excuse me I just posted a picture on the damage of the Celestial Catalytic Staff. This picture is essential to prove the the max hit of Fire Surge in Dungeoneering isnt as what is stated. Please undo your deletion. Fizzyliquid 23:42, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Regarding "external links" at the Corporeal beast page.
Corporeal beast teams are often, and should be recruited though the Teamwork section of the official runescape forums. However, many players do not know where to find this section, and often post incorrectly. Some of these threads are locked by Forum moderators, but most aren't (because there aren't many Forum moderators).

Hopefully, you will see the importance of adding the links to the Teamwork forums at the Corporeal beast page. Mugger759 13:04, April 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Most novices will try to fight the Corporeal beast with a team, which are only recruited through the official RuneScape forums. Given this fact, the right links are a vital piece of information.


 * "Any information that you wish to link should be explained in the article itself." - I don't have a crystal ball, and therefore I cannot provide a time table with active teams for any given time.
 * Mugger759 19:47, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Why did you remove the links again? I'm going to re-add them, unless you've got a strong argument for not doing it. The references to the stickied recruitment threads are very relevant to the article, because Novice PvMers/Corpers often don't have the patience to search for the right location of a specific thread. Furthermore, they don't even know where to find/how to use the forums (The majority of the players aren't very familiar with the official RuneScape forums). 09:33, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Eoin
I assume that you haven't read the Inheritance Cycle...well, basically, in the series, the elves are also in hiding in a forest and there is also only two elf children in their main city, one male and one female. OK for me to add it now? --Void Knight 05:31, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I have always though "Trivia" as some "casual stuff" and never knew there are so many complicated rules. --Void Knight 05:40, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Trivia Policy: Abuseable bugs
I've just tacked on the bit we discussed on the Yew Grove about not including trivia on ongoing bugs.

Do you think it is worth putting the text from the Glitch page in there as well for completeness?:

"Jagex has recommended that players who find a bug or glitch in RuneScape should report it to Jagex immediately via the "Submit a Bug Report" interface on the RuneScape main page."

10:04, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for being so active, just thought i'd stop by and say what a great job you've done since you were featured on the homepage :)

Skeletons
Good thing you're off for the next few days huh. ((iphone edit) 02:43, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * (:< 02:46, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Policies
Thanks! Can I ask what was causing it and how did you fix it? 03:17, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. Good to know. Right after I posted, I realized I could have just looked at the recent changes to figure it out. x.x Thanks again!  03:23, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Abuse filter
Hey, this edit triggered the abuse filter 3 when it shouldn't, I was hoping you could have a look at it. I narrowed it down to find the word "negative" triggered the filter. Hopefully you can find out why it is happening and try to fix it. Also this guy that spammed the Abuse filter was me, so don't warn/ban them. Thanks. 12:32, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fix is here, expression without lookarounds was matching  in negative. -- 13:31, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry i added it on again cuz i didnt pay attention to my messages :( but anyways Why do i have to take it off? Its a picture of my clan and a rs picture. Its all rs related i dont understand y everytime i try to upload something awesome, u moderators take it off. i worked pretty hard on that thing. plz just fix the ruels or something cuz thats a rs picture not a pic of me irl or anything.

— Greencat64 (talk) 21:00, April 16, 2011 (UTC)'''

'''I quit rs wiki u guys keep on being extremly annoying with all that policy crap! i hate rs wiki and u moderator guys now  '''— Greencat64 (talk) 21:06, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

shut up and go away rs wiki sucks, u suck, and ur policys suck — Greencat64 (talk) 21:12, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

what the crap dudei read the part about personal images. WHY DID THAT GET REMOVED U GUYS REMOVE IT I MADE IT FOR MY CLAN TO GET ON THEIR COMPUTER AND U GUYS ARE BEING GAY! UR POLICY SAYS THAT YOU WILL REMOVE IT IF IT WAS NOT A PART OF THE TOPIC OR WHATEVER, IT WAS A PART OF THE TOPIC!!!!!!!!! IT WAS FOR MY CLAN AND FRIENDS FOR A COOL PIC ON THEIR COMPS AND U GUYS GET ALL GAY ABOUT IT AND REMOVED IT! — Greencat64 (talk) 21:19, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Xenia
Why did you deleted parts of the Xenia page? --Void Knight 01:43, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Revert this for me? lol
Well, oddly enough when I tried to save the skill calc page it got all screwed up; i think my internet might've messed up; and I can't seem to undo myself~ (it lets me 'undo' but the page is still screwed up when i do?)

Mind reverting the edit back to cakemix for me? thx

URL is http://runescape.wikia.com/wiki/Skill_calculators

03:11, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Lol thanks a bunch; your a life saver hehe~

I'll see if i can edit it again (this time im most definitely using preview to make sure something didnt mess up lol!

03:15, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Hmm odd, if you try and edit that page with a page look other than monobook, the entire layout of the text gets messed up; tested a couple of time, switched to monobook and the layout is 100% correct...

03:19, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Well when initially going into it its RT, but i switch to source mode through the controls-- on this template it doesn't let you (atleast not that i know of) immediately go into source mode when clicking edit.... unless I missed something in my preferences.

03:24, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Actually yes, it is lol! guess i didn't go through my preferences very well ;) thx again =P 03:29, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Catogry Criteria?
Hey, Is there certain critera for adding cataogories? I added Daggonoth to Balmung thinking it was suitable, but as you then removed it, it was not, so what criteria are there? (if any)

I realise this may sound like a silly question, but I want to try and not make any more un-needed edits :P

09:03, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, that does help. Ty

09:18, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

I'm just bored ;)
Any1 else bored? Viisachi 16:53, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

I'm just bored ;)
Any1 else bored? Viisachi 16:53, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Edit farming?
No, it is just a coincidence that I recently found out how to add images and categories (I fail at coding). Honest. --Void Knight 23:08, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Mugger759
He has continued to add the external links to the Corp page. He refuses to desist, even after several people have reverted his edits. I don't know if asking admins to block others is in good taste, but it might be warranted here. As a thought. 07:28, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Abusefilter
Hey, would it be possible to let the abusefilter stop users from doing an edit, and giving them a prompt like "Are you sure your price update was done correctly following these steps? (confirm and continue button) (stop and go back to the page to use the script button)" If so, that would be nice. Many of the users who were warned by the abusefilter because they didn't use the script used the script again afterwards, which updated the last date incorrect. kthx, 13:53, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I was more thinking of stopping them, but giving them a "click here to continue your edit" button if they want to. That prevents double edits but still allows alch updates and such. 18:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

ohai
i c u 22:56, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * amg stalker 22:58, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/matthew2602/orly.jpg

23:01, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * stalker???? no im teh bestest stalkr 23:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ya. You pro stalker ajr. 23:03, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * ^, and nuuuu. 23:04, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * The point is hai 23:07, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * hai 23:30, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * nao u haz stalkarz 15:09, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Hi
Umm hi.. Go to bed lol. 07:21, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Live Chat - Issue
I'm pretty sure that was Cakemix again when the chat bugged out. Maybe action should be taken?

halp plz
Hey do you know how to make the revid="xxxxxxx" into a var in JavaScript? I want to make an Oasis version of Q's watchlist notifier, and to hide it after people visited it, I'll use the revision id of the last edit to the watchlist, which changes after a watched page is edited again, making it appear again then. I just need the vital part of the id for that so could you help me/give me the code for a var with the id? (asking you cuz you've done stuff with api before with the hybrid RC script) Thx, 00:15, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Season Tree
Why are you removing the formatting for no good reason? Without it, it just becomes a page clustered with images... Add a gallery at the least if you're going to remove it.Gr33nday345 18:29, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

User of the Month
Congrats on being User of the Month for April!-- 03:39, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Oh! You're here, instead of playing? What a surprise!
I'm sorry, Suppa, I didn't know you were here, or I would have said Hi. Sooooo... just exactly what is wrong with the new and improved Black Cavalier? Too big and bodacious? -- PIKWIT 15:11, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Capitalization
I thought all of the pages have the first letter of the bolded item capitalized. All the pages have that 16:00, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * almost all of the pages have it done that way. Quickly scanning: Proboscis, Charter ship. If you want to change all of the other pages, we can do that. I was just following what all the other pages looked like  16:04, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Other things with unneeded revisions that can be deleted:
The Chaos Tunnels picture on the Chaos Tunnels page, and the Chaos Tunnels picture on the Bork page (going from the Gargoyle room onwards, not the longer route one) can probably both have their latest revisions deleted.

Weird that when I uploaded revised images, it held onto the old images with revised filesize for as long as that is the latest change, but as soon as I re-upload the revised images it suddenly realises the ones I originally uploaded have different graphics...

Is there any way to tell whatever system handles those images that it needs to refresh its latest image?

20:16, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

RE:log.js
Thanks for telling me, 12:20, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

.
Hamburguesas! 166.137.12.30 06:01, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

Black Cavalier
Suppa, hi.

I for one have never seen a convincing argument for the continued use of AA since RS HD came in, much less for AA on a close-up using an orb. When an image is 5 pixels wide and looks like it came from the Atari era, that needs AA. Secondly, I took ever-loving pains to erase my own fat head just to make a white background, which I have seen changed into a transparency almost faster than I could submit it. If the Wiki wants the shot badly enough, it can work miracles in this pursuit. I've seen it with my own eyes. If you'd like to come up with a more convincing argument, I await your reply with baited(sp?) breath. -- PIKWIT 17:41, April 25, 2011 (UTC)

P.S. No matter if you AAx4 or AAx40, the N00B pic still looks like a ****pile of polygons. The Jagex rendering has improved. Look me in the whites of my character's eyes and say it hasn't.-- PIKWIT 19:56, April 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm taking a deep breath and making a suggestion. I suggest that I submit a slightly different image which better resembles the rakish angle of the original pic, and then... Wait, I can do my own transparency on Photobucket, but it's a pain in the butt. If someone else would do the trans, (yes, as usual) I would be very grateful. Thank you. As a further aside, there is a Vesuviuus of krufty old images that will soon flatten this Wiki like Pompeii. Could anyone (with more brains than a qumquat he said sotto vocce) and some authority please prioritize them in terms of shots I or someone else might actually get ahold of? The previous plan of making people grep through the images seems to be succeeding, but not at the rate previously imagined. It will go gangbusters after the next ice age ends. -- PIKWIT 00:11, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -- PIKWIT 22:30, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

amgggg
who did tat??? 03:29, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * k well ill be runing away nao bai 03:33, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * um........... i saw caek sry 03:37, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

blanking my page
How do i create that page. But more improtantly how do i move them?

User talk:Game rocker/Archive 1

???
Do you get lots of edits undoing other's edits?

Noob
Gtfo. Keyboard is not lit. 08:14, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Korasi's Sword
Look on the talk page, multiple people suggested to put down Korasi, Korasis and Prod Stick. Stop deleting.

Hiding my stuff.
It worked, thanks! =D 18:07, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

fire giants
why did you undo the dragon dagger edit to the drop table? I am at fire giants and just got 1 so im sure they drop them.

RE:???
Well howdy there fellow Texan!!@#$@#!$ ^-^ 21:12, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yus@!$@ Cypress, specifically. My house has so many boxes in it that it's like one ginormous moving box. D: 21:14, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

hi
PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS

PENUS


 * D

108.11.37.170 23:38, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * A good morrow to you. 23:39, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

HybridRecents
I've moved my duplicate of HybridRecents to User:Thebrains222/Counter Vandalism Feed and updated the links in your js files. Just so you know I've edited your pages and in case the changed link affects any future development. Also, I reckon "Counter Vandalism Feed" would be a good name if you make it official. 09:40, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, you might want to look into stopping the page from expanding when there is a long summary.

http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/2843/scrolly.png 09:55, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Fixing Cosmic Equipment page
Greetings, Suppa chuppa.

I would like to thank you for your assistance in editing the Cosmic Equipment page so the chart is more visible.

I never really performed edits on the wikia pages (but I do edit The Other Wiki), so I haven't yet fully grasped how to do so smoothly. I am glad to have received assistance in the matter.

Maesenko 07:56, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Re:
Wtf who are you?? I just joined this wikia and I get unsolicited message from you. WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME?????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Batman (talk * contribs)
 * But society will not allow it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Batman (talk * contribs)

Please re-open
Can you please re-open this discussion to let more discussion take place. There were 6 Opposes (37.5 %) to 10 Supports (62.5 %). In addition, the votes shifted direction from all oppose votes to almost all support. More discussion needs to take place to ensure a more accurate judgement; it was closed prematurely. Smithing 16:51, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Answer the question, please. Your explanation was not sufficient (all it says there was no consensus, which is clearly not true if you examine all the evidence, and take a look in previous featured images archives when the rule was not in place). Smithing 23:28, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Obviously you didn't examine previous featured images archives, or you wouldn't have closed it like that. I looked in archives 11-15 when the rule wasn't implemented and found absolutely no problem among the people who nominated their own images of the ones I examined. No revert wars, no crappy images, they all had significance and usefulness in articles (a few of them were featured). The other points were just bad (I mean, it's wrong to upload an image just for credit?, there are only positives to that).


 * Second, 10/16 is 62.5 %. Third, no it hadn't, it had only been 30 hours since the previous comment. And even if it had, it is clear to me there's consensus, the support votes were much stronger, and there was a clear shift in opinion. The results in the previous thread shouldn't be considered, only the points made in it, and consensus changes.


 * Please be more detailed than that, because I still believe that decision wasn't a smart one. Smithing 00:36, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Closing threads
Hey. I've noticed you've closed several Yew Grove threads such as Forum:Getting more active editors a little prematurely, and from what my friend above me is saying I'm not the only one to think this. I'd just like to ask that you think through if the thread should really be closed right there and then before you jump the gun. Even if the discussion's been dead for over a week, just request a comment. Remember, only close if consensus is not going to be reached or it already has been reached. Thanks. 07:08, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

archiving threads glitch
In the archived list sometimes a thread is listed twice. It happened to me a few weeks ago and I just saw it with two of yours, I capitalized the type of thread word and it now lists them only once. I do not know if we have to do it every time, but it just stopped those two from repeat listing. --Degenret01 13:53, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well I see others with non caps are not doubling, so I have no idea whats up.--Degenret01 14:01, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Completionist cape
I can no edit  21:17, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * No no, you don't have to un-protect it. I never wanted to edit it in the first place. Just making a point.  21:19, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, protecting a page, especially fully protecting a page, because of one guy does seem quite unnecessary. 21:21, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Mmk.  21:21, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Old section
Heard you didn't. 22:49, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * -.- 05:59, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * U no wat. 06:02, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

kthx
08:55, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

You know, you're quite the anti-vandal
You should become a sysop. 09:15, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

!!!!!!!
Why on earth did you delete those 11 images?! They were not at all unnecessary, but were showing off quest moments. For example, we have no images of D and Z together. Anyway, please undelete them. 06:03, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * If I'd be able too, I would. Also, nothing was cluttered, but ordered in a nice gallery at the bottom of the article and nice to view. Also, the image in which me and D fight the rock protector is about the text; fighting in the pit. 14:15, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you still haven't undeleted the files yet. Please do. I mean, you don't delete all the images of the Draynor Bank Robbery, do you? This is exactly the same. So please, once again, undelete them. Also, in the future, give a better reasoning than "unnecessary image", as I would not have uploaded it if it were unnecessary. Thanks. 17:24, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I will. I still don't get why 10 images of one robbery are okay, while they are not of the otehr robbery. Perhaps you could start an rfd next time, for the people who can't to Love Story but want to see the cutscenes. 14:15, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Opinions
Oic. Can you give me your opinion then? 10:05, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Meh. 10:08, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * No no no! I said "Meh" after I realised I did miss it, and that you were in fact correct.  10:10, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Suppaaaa.
Y U NO LET ME REVERT VANDALISM You make me feel slow D: 20:40, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yay! *runs to recent changes*  20:43, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Alchemy values
I updated by bot a few months ago to report on alchemy mismatches where the prices in the exchange page did not match the main article page, or where the low alchemy to high alchemy prices were not in the 2:3 ratio. There were about 400 or so that were wrong in some way. Over a period of one or two months I tried correcting 10 or so a day. In some cases I checked the prices myself, but because of the shear number of mismatching items, in other cases I just compared with runehq or tipit.

However, the runehq and tipit alchemy prices are sometimes wrong. So in some cases, when comparing our inconsistant values where I'd then chosen values based on runehq or tipit I could have got them wrong. For example, on runehq, the alchemy prices for harpoons are 2 (low) and 3 (high). Having now tested these myself, I can see they are wrong (as you well spotted ).

I have test alch'ed the items you mentioned (to check) and will correct the pages. I hopefully haven't made too many more mistakes, but if you spot them please let me know, or just correct them. By bot will spot if the main article changes and not the exchange page and log it so I can check and query if I have any doubt.

Btw, my bot only compares the alchemy values between the main article and the exchange pages if there is a 1-to-1 relationship between the pages, but that should help spot some vandalisms and errors earlier.

Btw2, the Brackish blade alchemy prices have been entered by someone as 150k and 70k for the alchemy values, which does not conform to the 2:3 ratio (and seem a bit high), so I'm not convinced they are right. However, I was going to wait a little longer for the item to crash a bit more before testing (unless someone else updates in the mean time).

19:30, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is a very useful list. It has the base values, which you correctly point out the alchemy values are 40% and 60% of. If I get time I might get my bot to compare the wikia alchemy prices with the list (or at least for the ones that have exchange pages because the exchange pages have the item id's that can be used to corrolate with the list). 20:42, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Hex
Yes! Finally I've beaten the almighty Suppa of antivandalism! 19:45, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Woops, thanks Suppa! 20:02, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Joey helped fix it. I like the script!  23:19, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Chee Ting
I left a message per my talk page as 2 replies came in. Really it's a simple "yes" and I'm mostly answering the responce from cook. Imdill3 13:01, May 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * 2nd... Imdill3 18:06, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

we r so gud
01:35, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

THAT WAS MALWARE?????
Oh crap 03:01, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

hai

 * 1) REDIRECTUser talk:69.137.17.88 18:55, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Ideas

 * 1) Highlight edits of IPs who were previously blocked
 * 2) Highlight edits of IPs who were recently caught by the abusefilter (particularily 3)
 * 3) On Exchange Watch change the link that currently points to the Exchange: page to view the diff instead, and replace the (diff) link with a link to the page (probably called "view")

Just a few ideas I thought up over breakfast, 02:00, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Heya
I'm bored. I'm new here. Nice to meet ya. Madness v2.0 08:17, May 16, 2011 (UTC)


 * Don't people generally post responses in the same section? :P And thanks. Looking forward to being somewhat useful. I'm an ex-WikiNazi. Madness v2.0 08:21, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm all game for any requests. I'm just looking through the policy guides and the like. However it is 3:30AM here and I do have to wake up in less than 5 hours, so I may not be editing/talking too much. Madness v2.0 08:28, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Charm log vandalism abusefilter
this made me think it's probably best to disallow any numbers of more than 5 characters long too (so  would be   then) because I don't think anyone would ever submit more than 10,000 kills anyway... And to block submissions with commas in them of 10,000 and higher too, you should do  (you should probably test it on the RC first, just to be sure) 15:02, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Request
if you see something that i contribute on the ghoul, or any other charm log, please dont block me, what i put is accurate because i bot it so it records how many i kill and how many charms i get, and i think it helps the charm log

Alchemy values
I updated my bot compare alchemy values with the base price in the item list you mentioned. In some cases, the item list base price seemed to be one higher than I expected, so made my bot ignore a rounding error up to 1. Also, the item list does not identify which items cannot be alchemised, so I also ignored cases where the wikia does not have any alchemy values (i.e. only compared where values were specified).

With the current prototype code in my bot, it only checks pages that use the Template:Infobox Item, but I think there might be other templates that might include alchemy values. The items are matched by name, so if a different name is used on the wikia to the item list, then they will not be compared. In some cases the item list contains multiple values (e.g. DG version of an item instead of main game version) in which case both calculated high alchemy and both calculated low alchemy values are show (with a "/" between).

The mismatch results for the Template:Infobox Item uses are currently listed in my User:Amaurice/Sandbox2 page. Please feel free to fix up some of the wikia pages if they are wrong. Also, it you know of other templates that mention high alchemy values I could look at checking those too.

If useful, I could set up my bot to perform this task regularly. 12:33, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * I've updated my bot to also check pages that use Template:Infobar Summon Scroll, Template:Infobar Summon Pouch, Template:Infobox Food and Template:Infobox Seed. 12:59, May 18, 2011 (UTC)