User talk:Oil4

I have recently archived my talk page for the first second time. Yay for emptiness.

Siggy
Yay first post! Ya, so I made an undo to your siggy, here. It was messing up formatting and the initial edit seemed to be suspect coding. Just wanted to give you a heads up, hope it helped. 19:41, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: WHAT?!
=o Oli4howeveryouspellit is a difficult to spell name. Would cookiez make you happy again? 21:32, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good to hear. =p 22:01, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * AMG m4h fu11ee 1337 h4x0r t@1|< p@g3 @$p10d3d!##@@@@!!!!!shift11111111111 22:39, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape Wiki Post Newsletter: Mar 01 10
This automated newsletter message was sent by QBot on 03:48, March 1, 2010 (UTC).

Re:Noooooo!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAMSPAM

Quick, send one back! 09:44, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Stubbornness
I'm not stubborn =O I just refuse to change my beliefs. That's quite different from stubborness. ;) Lol jk. I am a bit stubborn.  22:12, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

yer
i have noticed that but i called it "myface" becuse you can see npc face, so i called it my-face, i might rename it, but i got nothing atm =)

AOTM Votes
Just an FYI, while it is nice to it doesn't matter really if people say why they oppose or support an article. The AOTM is pretty much a pure vote count, the closer doesn't have to weigh arguments as they do in RFAs.--Degenret01 10:47, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe they are too embarrassed to put their names next to the word support? lol.--Degenret01 15:01, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re:wtf?
You've never heard of Iri Camas? -- 21:30, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Amg you poor child. :\ -- 21:32, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE:
I WILL MESS WITH MR. KHIL WHENEVER I WANT

AND PS

TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO. HEHEHEHEHE HEHEHEHE LALALALALALALALALA HOHOHOHO

21:35, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Prize
10k. Come talk to me in game when I am online and I will give it to you. 18:36, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

cache images
thanks for your support on the issue. regarding what i am proposing, hopefull this will clear it up:

the cache would have an article, with ALL, both unreleased and released, images on it.

the images would ONLY appear on that article, and could not be used on normal articles. think of it like a list/archive: thats whats in the cache, and we are keeping a list of it. i want it to be a tool for speculators- a place that you could browse threw, seeing if anything interesting was it in, or if any new stuff was likely to come into the game any time soon. however, i want to keep the actual speculating off the wiki.

both fo these ideas can be changed- i just tryed to organize it in the most wiki-friendly way. if you want something removed/added to how it would work, feel free to tell me. 23:09, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

we *could* have 1000s of images on subpages, couldnt we? im not sure if it would be a good idea, however. dont u think it would kinda encourage speculation about what they are if we where to only include future update ones? im a qcape owner, and speculate all the time but i dont think that i could know and recognize every single model.. 13:28, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

how about this: we list ever images as a number, and say what it is. then, on a subpage, have actual images of items that dont exist in game. 13:34, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

but whats so bad about a list? it wouldnt make ppl lag, and it doesnt sound that hard to make. 14:51, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

the only images would be items that are not ingame. everything else would have a number or a name. 14:57, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

not a single list on this wiki, that iv seen, is disorganized. and i dont wanna just ignore the things that are aready in game... 15:02, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

what about this? 15:27, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

ok, so whatever we do with a catagory to make it un-disorganizeable, why dont we do that with this? 18:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

still, doesnt sound like a big deal. 19:50, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cache
I appreciate farcasters enthusiasm, but even I did not know he intended to have every image on a single page. Like he said though, its all open to negotiation and can be changed easily. I think getting the idea of allowing cache images at all is what we were all generally talking about, and hope you change back to support. 19:15, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

i didnt intend that..... just the name/number of every single image, and not all on 1 page. 19:45, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape Wiki Post Newsletter: The Golden Quill Awards!
This automated newsletter message was sent by QBot on 00:33, March 30, 2010 (UTC).

UotM support
This message is to thank you dearly for your kind words and support in my nomination as the User of the Month. It's a nice thing to know that the community appreciates my contributions here, and I am both honoured and privileged to be April's UotM. Again, thank you. 08:07, March 31, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, in that case, I won't give you a cookie as thank you. Nah, thanks for the kind words. =)  08:44, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
That was a very civil (nice) thing to do. Leftiness 22:59, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the page you mean is RS:AR?

RS:FI
http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt101/Twigy_tag1/Cowmill.png Like that? 05:36, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

your choice
im leaving it up to you when we re-open the discussion about the cache. when you do open it, please tell me. if i receive no message from u saying uv opened it, ill open it in a month or 2. 01:02, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Your RSMV Wikia
Heyoooo, my name's Alex. I found your RSMV wikia by accident, and I edited a page, and I'm probably going to do more. I hope you don't mind =D, I checked your page and noticed you haven't done much on this wiki. It's a good idea, and I'd like to know some plans you had for it incase you didn't want to really do much on it so I can possibly carry them out? o__o ^-^ pchAlex 21:22, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

RuneScape Wiki Family Photo!
(may cause lag)

http://i611.photobucket.com/albums/tt192/ssswizmig/1FamilyPhoto.png 18:06, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

It's only helmetnub :P Lol, I wanted to have a title this year and I had to put it somewhere >_> 20:16, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * The "=)" guys is just me taking some blank space, as for Sentra..I gotta remember to apologise 20:28, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see then. Do you know who the owner is, then? And sorry to bug ya =s xD pchAlex 07:59, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

cache
idk if u know, and idk if ur intrested anymore, but the cache discussion is up 4 a vote. 20:35, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Triumvirate
Greetings,

The RSWP is happy to inform you that the wiki has joined the Triumvirate. Those interested in taking part, please sign up here.

Cheers,

The RSWP

This automated newsletter message was sent by QBot on 03:07, June 5, 2010 (UTC).

Welcome back
Glad to see you're now active again. Planning on staying? 13:11, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I embarrassed him on Kickabout, he's too ashamed to show his face. 17:19, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * 0 17:33, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * ^ how much you won. 17:37, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * youre face > @#@ 17:41, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Aww, that's too bad then. I kinda got used to seeing you putting your "1337 3D171N6 5K1LL2" to good use on the Wiki, but at least it's nice to see you again on the Wiki. Just please, no matter what you decide to do whilst here on the Wiki, don't click here. If you've already clicked there, please do the honourable thing and steal Rwojy's bukkit collection sign my Guestbook, pl0x! Later, gator! 17:43, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * atleast im not a noob 11:31, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * you've unleased the beast... 11:35, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * RAGE 11:41, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Inserting RAGESPAM in 3 11:47, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2 12:12, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Lol
The script I was using was supposed to leave a custom message that I would use to say I delt with them, but Ajr (who wrote it) must have changed things. 12:53, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Block
As a general rule of thumb, I always block on the first edit if the edit involved something inappropriate. His edit involved something about "cocks", "boners", and "masterbaton" (misspelled form of masturbation). That's enough for me to block on the first edit. 15:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Oli-Basically there's not much hope for people like that. People who go in and say...mess with values in infoboxes are oftentimes just screwing around, and they don't think it will change on the page. You tell them, and they are like...oh okay, and sometimes they start contributing. (Why we have test edit warning templates). People who add profanity to pages...they know exactly what happens, and they want that, so there's really not much of a point in waiting to see if they vandalize more, because it's just a question of when, not whether. 3 days isn't that long of a block either. 16:29, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * There's also hope the Detroit Lions will win the superbowl...that doesn't mean it's going to happen. Just because there's hope doesn't mean it's worth it. And if he/she/it/thing/being does decide to contribute in 3 days, that's all fine and well, but more likely they'll have gotten bored and left or they will just come back and vandalize. 16:42, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Most people consider them the worst team in the NFL, sorry, didn't know you were from Europe. And...he gets a second chance...in 3 days. 16:52, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe, maybe not, we'll see in 3 days. 16:57, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

chrome
I saw you said something about that firefox lags extremely much, on the Talk:Graphical improvements, so i wanted to say Google Chrome does actually not, and it is totally free. Please don't start a discussion with me, i just wanted to say it. Good luck. 15:59, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * How can he know if Google Chrome will not also lag? It's mainly down to CPU and connection speed (i think o_O). "Please don't start a discussion with me" why ever not?
 * Anyway, you might want to tweak your about:config in FF to increase the speed. This only works if you are using broadband and not dialup.
 * If you want to do it, open a new tab and type in about:config. Click "I'll be careful, promise". In the filter type in "network.http". You will see various "preference name"s.
 * Find the following


 * 1) network.http.pipelining, change the boolean to true
 * 2) network.http.proxy.pipelining, change the boolean to true
 * 3) network.http.pipelining.maxrequests, change the integer to 8
 * 4) network.http.max-connections, change the integer to 50
 * 5) network.http.max-connections-per-server, change this to 30

Also, you could change the amount of time it takes for the browser to display the information it has received. I haven't done this, but you could: search for nglayout.initialpaint.delay” and set its value to 0 (zero) If you don't have it, right-click New-> Integer, and make it yourself. 07:15, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem 08:44, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Wtf?
I created it so I could redirect that userpage to my userpage (User:Lil diriz 77), and also so no one could impersonate me. 20:03, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * <.< Because some people are meanies.
 * *pouts* 20:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Some people were born to be mean.  21:07, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Anything can happen ! He'll kill your kids and burn your crops! 03:38, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * What? You don't remember? Wow, you really were drunk that night... 08:17, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Crops aren't the only thing you planted <_< 09:27, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * No Oli... you planted your man seeds. I don't take it you remember Sheila? Of course not, you were drunk. Well... now she lives in the ghetto, with no father to watch over your kids. I bet you feel bad, huh? Well, as I've said, Stewie is no one to mess with... Sheila's address is 832 Orangewood Lane. Go to her. 10:14, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, dude, are you mad?! Now that you posted that, any chance of the four children surviving Stewie's ruthless murder has been reduced to ZERO ! He is watching this conversation as we speak. Not only will he kill yours and Sheila's kids, but also those poor Irish kids. 10:41, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I wanan know how many times Brian's screwed that blonde girl. 19:54, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE:User talk:Bai Ze
I made that mistake too. 08:07, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Wow
...What policy? 08:50, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I still don't know what you're talking about. Could you perhaps link to it? 10:27, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. So you know, the whole RE: thing is meant to be used with the heading of the discussion. For example, I post something on your talk page with the heading ( ==____== ) "Lolcatz". If you wanted to use RE: to reply you'd have the heading "RE:Lolcatz". If you use something different they won't have any idea what you're talking about.

When you used "Re:Wow" I thought you were refering to me moving all those treasure trail guide pages...

In response to your question, lol not sure. 10:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm that doesn't make any sense... the point is you could clarify on what you were talking about... 10:51, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Great Orb Project
So why is it that you hate GOP? I for one think its the best thing on Runescape.

Arrr...
Ahoy ,

http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/matthew2602/pirate.png

HAPPY

INTERNATIONAL

TALK

LIKE

A

PIRATE

DAY

FROM MATTHEW2602

22:50, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

50 Edits
I agree, but as a new user, how can I tell if I have these 50 edits or not?

18:49, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

I mean for Uotm voting. How do I know If at least 50 of my edits are non profile/user talk/sandbox edits?

04:06, February 3, 2011 (UTC)

The Stone of Jas
It was mentioned in the lore livestream! 02:25, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Quick question
First of all, welcome back! =) And no, there isn't (I happen to be proposing it on the Yew Grove though) - I just find it extremely ugly. 10:51, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Great. Join Badgerwatch please. It was erected in view of the "outcome" of Forum:Join Wikia Alliance. 10:56, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * You're dead to me. 11:04, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[File:Jealous Rage.gif]]


 * NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! 11:11, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[File:Angry Enhanced.gif]]


 * I'll show you. Apologise now and you may be able to redeem yourself in front of the Acorn Queen. 11:20, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[File:Gravedigger.gif]]


 * I will obliterate you. You thought I was Fswe1, didn't you? Well, you thought wrong. Hehehe... Prepare to meet your end! I AM A GOD!! 11:47, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[File:Mahjarrat Transformation.gif]]

Re: vandalism warning
Oh, my bad. I thought I rollbacked it. 11:50, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this happens to me more than it should. We have quite a few ninjas amongst ourselves. 11:56, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Good sir
welcome back, my dear fellow 12:10, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

RE
Probably is, but I don't have a bot right now. And don't know someone who does. It may or may not also require some human discretion, but meh. Either way, you should be eased to know that I am watching recent changes even as I spam. 16:01, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

RE
It's not like I'm using the tool maliciously, so just loosen up. 17:02, March 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * Why make a big deal out of this?... But whatever... For the second edit it was certainly warranted; I had already warned the user that his edit was unhelpful and not too long after, he replicated the exact edit I had already removed. The first? Maybe it wasn't entirely necessary and perhaps I could have undone it, but I've come to the habit of rollbacking any 0 charm submissions. It's not because they're blatant vandalism, it's because they need no summary to explain that the submission was faulty and perfectly acceptable to remove. Not to mention the fact that this user didn't even use the submission box; he edited the the page directly - evident by the kills parameter being empty (which was just more reason that the revert needed no explanation). 17:10, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * You are seriously making a mountain out of this Mol hill. It's rather insulting that you think I am unable to discern between what is and what is not acceptable use of the tool. You are the first person to complain about my judgement and it's over something as minute as an inappropriate charm log update. Can you stop trying to incriminate me over such a silly disagreement? 17:24, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * And in doing so, you've followed that page as policy and blindly so. The page merely provides examples; it is not the law. After a reread of the page, I've only come to find that my understanding was correct: while it is "primarily used to revert obvious cases of vandalism" (exact quote), the page has a strong implication that the only difference between rollback and undo in terms of relevance of use is that rollback is when an edit does not absolutely require an edit summary. I never assumed mal-intent (my use of template:cl1 shows that I assumed it was a test) as I reverted his edits nor did I find it necessary to provide an edit summary. Yes, you could argue that I could have undone the edit with a summary of "empty submission", but the same logic could apply to reverting vandalism versus undoing it. I do not see my decision as inappropriate and I stand by my use of the rollback tool for this situation. 17:34, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * There's no need to worry; I assume good faith. But of course you should understand that it is a bit uneasy for someone when their assumptions are being questioned. Should you not? I'm glad you care, but I'd like you to understand that I never had any assumption that the IP in question was mala fide. 19:06, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Zanaris moon source
http://services.runescape.com/m=forum/forums.ws?15,16,330,64612578 13:54, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

RE
It was too far off the predicted average that we have for such a large number. It was either spam or included a large amount of bias; either way it wasn't an entry to keep. 18:50, March 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * I am leaning more towards it being bias. His gold charms were just way too low for it to be acceptable. 18:52, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

RE:‎Thanks
You're welcome. (: 13:49, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Re:God Wars
A discussion in the chat, yeah. Basically, it's wrong to refer to our God Wars as if they were the only ones. Besides, they weren't the biggest ones: no gods died and the entire dimension wasn't destroyed because Guthix stopped them semi-on time. 20:22, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Assassination of Guthix
Heh, thanks! =) I've finished now, but feel free to add information or correct grammar should you need to. Next project: Bandos. 20:56, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Equation
It's the average number of selections between 0 and 1 to add up to a number greater than x, which is relevant to RuneScape in that it shows (continuously) the number of hits it will take to kill a monster, where x would be lifepoints/max. It shows that the overkill loss (the part of the hit lost to nothingness because the monster is already almost dead) approaches 2/3 of your max. 18:29, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Special:DoubleRedirects
Your mess, clean it up. 14:42, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

Talk-huh?
In the clan chat? If so, I don't remember…please explain.


 * I was simply going to ask; what does Imxor do to benefit the community? Besides filling up the clan list and being some fairly nasty things, he really doesn't do much. Why are you defending him? 16:03, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

Tourist Trap
Because that wasn't trivia. There's a separate page for AdLog and Juna transcripts. 11:56, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hi
Thanks for helping me! I figured out how to edit, but navigating the wiki was confusing me x_x Ilikewiki (talk) 19:58, May 7, 2013 (UTC)