User talk:Iiii I I I

REPLY:
Hi, the reason why I didn't do so was because I am still familiarising myself with most tools on the wiki as a new editor myself. This is also a preventative step to ensure that nothing is erroneously saved in the wiki systems.

With that said, maybe you could teach the correct procedure to move articles? Or is there a guide to that somewhere around the web? Thanks,

Why did you do this terrible thing, my flame
? 19:22, January 8, 2015 (UTC
 * I hope it wasn't a technicality over the page title. The archive section is handy, it makes AD a one-stop shop. No one likes a two-stop shop. 20:40, January 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * On that. 20:41, January 8, 2015 (UTC)

Waterbirth
About this pic, I wonder why jagex doesn't do it that way... It looks really great the way you did it. I guess you're really the expert on birthwater then. 20:27, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Theirs looks more cluttered though. Yours did turn out really well. 20:34, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * More like afterbirth amirite fetus 22:15, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * More like gaybuttwadmcdumbpoopshitbean amirite elune 22:28, January 21, 2015 (UTC)

Article 'header' order
By lack of better wording, I'm grouping everything that is generally placed before the infobox / first paragraph. First should come the links to the RSC and 07scape articles, if applicable, followed by any variant of Otheruses and Redirects; all of these lead the user away from the current article. Only after those should come headers that pertain to the current article and provide information about the subject. Yes, with the recent box-ification of a few of these headers is may look odd, but it is illogical to first present users with information about the article, then try to redirect them elsewhere, and then pick up with the article again. I don't know if you have plans to box-ify the Otheruses template as well, but if so, it'd make things look less odd. That said, the box-ification does take up more height than the simple text it used to be, which isn't a problem except for articles that have several of them... IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 05:43, February 6, 2015 (UTC)

tuna
I herd u r a gay fish? 22:52, February 14, 2015 (UTC)

twittttter
fetus phd doctor proffessor senior king, can you pls make a new image for the RSWiki twitter, since the theme has changed from brown to blue? (for consistency and all)

Thanks!

shop image
Hey, why was the firemaking cape erased? Does it not appear there at 99 FM anymore? :o --Jlun2 (talk) 23:08, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

2015 RSW Family Photo
Yo, I notice you haven't submitted a photo yet. You have until March 1st. Please try to get it in. Remember the dimensions should be 150x250px. Thanks, 16:24, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

List of elders
File:List of elders interface.png

Hey is the top part supposed to say "Treasure Clue"? --Jlun2 (talk) 03:46, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Underground Pass
Well, the RS:QSG clearly states that nouns, (ad)verbs and adjectives should be capitalised in the heading, so I don't know why you reverted it back. I would hold QSG over STYLE for quest articles.

Nevertheless, there is a conflict in the 2 style guides and I think we should fix this asap. Maybe get a thread going in the YG. 11:39, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea; maybe even a revamp of the style guides. They seem messy. Unfortunately, I'm usually on for just a few minutes, so could I ask you to create the thread please?

And since this seems resolved to me, I'm gonna go ahead and change the quest page to meet the style requirements. 14:44, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Skeleton Champion fight
All champions have battle images (or most, at least), no reason the skeleton shouldn't have one. Granted, the latest version was terrible, but still. 13:22, March 9, 2015 (UTC)

Herb tea obsolete
I originally added the Obsolete tag not simply because the "tradeable" parameter had to be swapped; but because I assumed all related Exchange pages need to be removed. Are you taking care of that, or will that be left forgotten without the note? IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 14:29, March 9, 2015 (UTC)

Prifddinas forum
It might be unnecessary, but was there any consensus on " area", " district" etc? As far as I could see only 2 people commented on that. That said, perhaps no further comments would follow. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 05:08, March 11, 2015 (UTC)