User talk:Dǐll Kevlar/Archive/1

{| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" id="proxylist-table" rel="50" width="100%" Hey everyone, I'll make sure to leave a message on your page and this page when neccesary.
 * - class="row colouredrow" rel="8701691"
 * class="timestamp" rel="1305333662"|==Leave A Message After The Beep. Beeeeeep==

Hey, yeah....thanks for being home and all. Anyway, I just wanted to get back to you about that message you sent me. Interesting place you put it. Well, anyway, balance is power! 00:47, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Lock a page
If you mean to protect it so it can only be edited by registered users, ask a sysop to protect it. We only do this for archives or vandalism targets though.--Degenret01 15:47, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Store
You put it in the mainspace so I moved it to a subpage for you, here User:Chee_Ting/Parody.--Degenret01 19:20, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Greetings
Hey from a RuneScapian. Not sure the point of this greeting.anyways 18:53, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Poll
I've never done it myself, but it looks like Help:Poll should give you a hand. Don't forget to keep it to your user space! 01:01, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Hey
I'm everywhere :). I'm activate at quite some wiki's, and the RuneScape wiki is one of them. The RuneScape Wiki is my first Wikia wiki éver, to be precise :). I (used to) play a lot of RuneScape. Mark ( talk ) 15:20, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * They'd better :P! Mark  ( talk ) 15:29, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Happy birthday
Congratz, you're *insert number here*. Coelacanth0794 17:07, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Forum:Changing the logo/Submissions
I like your logo :P -- 23:00, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Same. If it comes down to "population" voting in the end, which i think it might, im totally voting for yours. =D - 07:09, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is hard labour. In fact it's the most excersize I get all day... and I play rugby union! My mouse weighs like 7tons and is stuck to the table with some sort of glue 0_o I don't know how it got there though - 14:42, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:16k
Hmm, assuming that there are indeed 16,018 articles at the moment and that I counted backwards from Special:NewPages correctly, Polished zogre bone should be the 16,000th article. 14:01, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Colour names
Good seeing you again :). Names can be coloured by using the code here. Just replace the href="/wiki/User:USER" with the desired username. Hope this helps :). Remember RS:AEAE though. 21:20, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Help
What do you need? 14:04, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you be more specific?
 * 1) Where did the bombing come from
 * 2) Who did the bombing?  17:12, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, that makes sense. Best thing to do is contact a VSTF member who will clean it up for you. I'll make sure the IP address is banned. 17:28, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

Harassment
Okay. Would you like me to remove it? You also might want to ask Megan about it. 20:56, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Clock
I'm afraid not, AFAIK it takes quite some time to create such a timer. You can find the code here. Mark ( talk ) 08:38, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Habbo, lol. I used to play habbo what almost 8 years ago? Yea in 2003 <.< -- http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/2993/asdadq.png   08:39, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Profile
The only reason we haven't left to is because they have our metaphorical balls in a legal vice. 03:57, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * indeed sir. If we were to leave, they wouldn't let us remove content from here, or even tell visitors to go to the new wiki. It'd split our community and only the wikia half will live, because its part of a huge network. 04:05, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Nty.
Nty. -- 01:40, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Inv image
We keep the outline. That's probably why people were reverting File:Molten glass.PNG. 05:00, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Cannot click links in Monobook
You can's click the links because of that unicorn. You said you wanted to be told so I'm telling you. 20:23, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you can't have code just for Monobook (Monaco has been discontinued), if there was a way (with Javascript, I'm sure there is is a way) you could but until then you have to adjust for both. 22:18, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

ok
would you like me to make you a area, make a area yourself or link a area you already have? -- 19:15, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Hi
Hi, thanks. (: I love doing image maintenance. 04:24, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

transculency
Hi, please do not add transculency to images unless they shine through in-game too, because we want the images to be as accurate as possible. this doesn't have transculency in-game, so shouldn't have it here. thanks, 08:58, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Huh
Baby-blue? you mean the user area?-- 12:37, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Finaly
would u like a new area, or link to a area you already have?-- 19:34, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Yellow Compress
I don't really understand what you mean. Compressing an image won't change colors, and indexing them will lose quality. The images are already pretty small, anyway (File:Cosmic bar.png is 631B and File:Shaikahan.png is 212B). -- 20:13, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * You could also either download a lossless compressing program or use an online compresser(both same compressing amount). 20:17, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Dragon Staff
Thanks for applying trans to my images :) Although Dragon staves are hard to come by :P 22:17, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

sorry and welcome
Sorry for the Delay, but your area is now set up!

File:Fremennik_Robes.PNG
File:Fremennik_Robes.PNG, can upload the original as you kind of messed up the trans (blotches here and there). 19:24, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Animations
Hi, I think you heard wrong. I'm terrible at animations, you may be looking for Ryan PM. 17:57, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18:02, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Cannon Animation
I'm somewhat busy right now, but if it hasn't been done by later today, I'll upload an animation of it. 19:06, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re:D staff image
No problem. Just keep up the good work! :D 22:57, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

I can has rubber band?
Here's 4gp can I have a rubber band now? 14:47, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Lumby image
I don't know anything about that image but if I had to guess it looks like a picture of the hut in front of the Lumby castle gates, but at night. You might want to ask whoever uploaded the image for more information. Cheers, 01:08, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

re
shhhh --Cakemix 01:01, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Reuploading
Could you please read RS:BUG? 20:08, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

re:Grave gif
Okay, I'll take gifs of all those graves, but I will need help of others too. What grave do you have? 02:42, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Cook
What? <.< 03:10, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Chee Ting
Do you own both Imdill3 and Chee Ting? 05:09, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Seeing as both accounts used the same IP within 9 minutes of eachother, I think it's clear that they're the same account. Using multiple accounts to get a featured image passed is gaming the system, and if you do it again both accounts will be blocked. I'm also not too fond of your recent edits. 05:29, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm just replying here. No, the Chee Ting account is used for seperate visual testing on Habbo Wiki, it's simply a forgetful situation. I wrote on the featured image page that it was -my- idea, I figured peaople would understand. Hell, do you really think someone 1 minute apart is up and ready about posting a support on a featured image? May I also remind you to assume the better. Imdill3 12:59, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bonus Edit (troll edition): Plus, I think it's a little extreame to block someone from 1 up vote (which I say again, was merged together anyways). It is also arguable on RS:GTS that this is not abuse. In no section of it does it explain multiple user accounts. In policy, it's not assumption to think of every loophole. (In a nutshell: The policy has no rule against multiple accounts. The closest possible remark is "loophole" but, as far as other policy is concerned- all accounts are seperate people.) Kthx Imdill3 13:48, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's simply laughable to say that our policy on gaming the system should not be followed because it doesn't include every single possible way to game the system; that in itself is clearly against RS:GTS as well. You say that it's a "forgetful" situation? You referenced User:Chee Ting in the third person, which makes me wonder why in the world you would do anything like that. In addition, your edits like this and this may soon get you blocked, so I suggest you stop. 17:02, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I never said it shouldn't be followed, I'm saying it isn't included. Second, LOOK WHO UNDID IT!!!! It was up for >1 minute, your examples are laughable. Please, find something else to do, we all know 1 spam 2 months ago means little to nothing- clicking "rollback" or even worst "undo" ONCE must be hard for you. Maybe look at the contributions I've made instead. Maybe we should block you for failing to read one of the most basic Wikia policies. (http://help.wikia.com/wiki/Advice:Assuming_good_faith) --Imdill3 17:19, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Correction: Nevermind the Wikia policy, I think it's just looked upon (Advice)... Imdill3 17:22, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Most things aren't "included" in that policy, so why are you even making that argument? The problem with your vandalism is not the time that it takes me or someone else to revert. It's that we expect someone who has been around here for more than a year not to screw with someone's userpage or add crap about 's face. Those two idiotic things you did sort of tossed AGF (which in fact I have read) out the window. You say to look who undid it, but in the three three of the examples I showed you, the people who undid your edits were Andorin, Revan and Suppa. We established in Parsonsda's blocking thread that for the most part, people should not be given lesser punishment for their good contributions. Thus if you were a new user who vandalized two pages and used a sockpuppet to support your own nomination, chances are you would be blocked. 17:31, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you gave 2 examples. One was burnt food, which as you can see I undid myself. The other was apparently a user page, however Chee_Ting wasn't warned to my knowledge. However, as for Edits VS Block, I think a forum should be established for that with the question: "does contribution give admin more scale over to block or not?" kind of like the event we held for defining Unregistered Users (It would be nice to go along with AEAE too). And again, I clarified in that nomination that it was not Chee_Ting's idea. Holy crap man, it's as simple as removing the nom. I think it's funny how trying to make the front page .0001% less dull was simply not removed. I also think that's how the community works here- no matter how simple a good change is, someone has to argue about it and threaten to block someone. P.S. If I really wanted to spam, do you think I'd do it safly from my own account at the same IP? Trust me, I've seen some of the best spam tactics on my home Wiki, where spammers come together. And even then, It's just a constant "UNDO" or "ROLLBACK". Nuff Said. Imdill3 17:46, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Most things aren't "included" in that policy, so why are you even making that argument? The problem with your vandalism is not the time that it takes me or someone else to revert. It's that we expect someone who has been around here for more than a year not to screw with someone's userpage or add crap about 's face. Those two idiotic things you did sort of tossed AGF (which in fact I have read) out the window. You say to look who undid it, but in the three three of the examples I showed you, the people who undid your edits were Andorin, Revan and Suppa. We established in Parsonsda's blocking thread that for the most part, people should not be given lesser punishment for their good contributions. Thus if you were a new user who vandalized two pages and used a sockpuppet to support your own nomination, chances are you would be blocked. 17:31, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you gave 2 examples. One was burnt food, which as you can see I undid myself. The other was apparently a user page, however Chee_Ting wasn't warned to my knowledge. However, as for Edits VS Block, I think a forum should be established for that with the question: "does contribution give admin more scale over to block or not?" kind of like the event we held for defining Unregistered Users (It would be nice to go along with AEAE too). And again, I clarified in that nomination that it was not Chee_Ting's idea. Holy crap man, it's as simple as removing the nom. I think it's funny how trying to make the front page .0001% less dull was simply not removed. I also think that's how the community works here- no matter how simple a good change is, someone has to argue about it and threaten to block someone. P.S. If I really wanted to spam, do you think I'd do it safly from my own account at the same IP? Trust me, I've seen some of the best spam tactics on my home Wiki, where spammers come together. And even then, It's just a constant "UNDO" or "ROLLBACK". Nuff Said. Imdill3 17:46, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, you gave 2 examples. One was burnt food, which as you can see I undid myself. The other was apparently a user page, however Chee_Ting wasn't warned to my knowledge. However, as for Edits VS Block, I think a forum should be established for that with the question: "does contribution give admin more scale over to block or not?" kind of like the event we held for defining Unregistered Users (It would be nice to go along with AEAE too). And again, I clarified in that nomination that it was not Chee_Ting's idea. Holy crap man, it's as simple as removing the nom. I think it's funny how trying to make the front page .0001% less dull was simply not removed. I also think that's how the community works here- no matter how simple a good change is, someone has to argue about it and threaten to block someone. P.S. If I really wanted to spam, do you think I'd do it safly from my own account at the same IP? Trust me, I've seen some of the best spam tactics on my home Wiki, where spammers come together. And even then, It's just a constant "UNDO" or "ROLLBACK". Nuff Said. Imdill3 17:46, May 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay. I'm going to be blunt with you. Your vandalism to the Cooking/Burn level article was not reverted by any account which you have access to. Andorin was the one who removed it. Secondly, what does it matter if it's just a constand "UNDO" or "ROLLBACK" as you put it? Almost every single piece of vandalism is merely a "rollback". Because it's so easy to get rid of bad faith edits do we decide that those edits do not warrant a block? No. Your arguments are doing nothing for you. I urge you to simply stop now and comply with this warning; nothing will come out of it if you keep arguing. 17:52, May 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry? Did Cook want you to answer for him? And who the hell said I wanted any gain? I'm merely trying to make a god damn point that 1 false slip is average. I undid 1 myself in a short time, 1 was obviously a joke spam (see my last 4 lines above) and one didn't exist apparently. kthx. (By the way, consider reading the Good Faith Advise by Wikia too, you must really need it) --Imdill3 18:06, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, suppa and I are actually the same person. It seems we have different definitions of what a slip is; in my book, it means accidentally adding the wrong category, forgetting to preview or making some other good-faith mistake. What you have done is not a minor slip-up, it was a concerted effort to vandalize. If you actually did read RS:AGF, you would have seen what is not good faith. The edits I laid out earlier are clearly in bad faith, and I must continue to protest that you did not undo any of the edits that I mentioned. 18:13, May 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * I already said, I was simply logged into my other account when I made the post. You might understand that accually, I'm not positive but, did you ironically stay logged into your other account when you just posted there? Oh and some more irony, It's bad faith to assume bad faith. I think I may be worked up about this because you don't understand the post was an honest mastake. Secondly, I think (it's a damn shame Wikia doesn't have a log of this or check it if you do- apparently you have some knowledge of account IP log/time log which I never knew of) there may have been an Edit Conflict (ditto save) between me and the admin on the burnt food thing. The only reason to view a user's IP and log time (or false acusation of) is for seriouse offences like mass spam, criminal threats, and personal crualty to others. Otherwise, if you go and check (or acuse) everyone like my self of this, please get a life. 1,000th edit on this bullshit thx. Imdill3 18:25, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * RuneScape:CheckUser "Finding which users use a common IP, for looking into abuse of multiple accounts." 18:30, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fuck you, get a life, Kthx :). Imdill3 18:34, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Your userpage header
I commented out the header on your userpage (the floating semitransparent one) because userpages may not cover essential wiki functions. When your userpage is viewed with the Monobook skin, the header covers several links at the top (talk/edit/history/delete/move, those sorts of links). -- 05:12, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

okay..
Number 1-I am quite aware of that. Number 2-Are you even aware of what you just wrote? "..."it is expected that others will not edit except to make minor corrections, improvements, or to revert vandalism..." Read it. Read it again. Are you not noticing that bit about corrections? Not ever single exact exception to every single policy is listed, because life and the wiki are fluid and ever changing and we need to be able to adapt to the now to deal with what is happening now around us. I made a correction. Get past it guy.--Degenret01 15:02, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * No. Do not leave anything broken and we won't have to fix it.--Degenret01 00:58, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

RS:DDD
You should probably stop deleting the discussion. It won't bring any good. 00:39, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Blanking your talk page
Hello, we have a policy of not deleting discussions, so if you would like to have a clear talk page, then you may archive it. To archive a talk page, simply create a page titled User talk:/Archive 1 (or another subpage name of the same effect), be sure to include a link to your archive on your talk page and move the contents of your talk page there. 00:41, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * }
 * }