User talk:Leevclarke

Apronym(Acronym?)
Well. I had 5 minutes to kill before sleeping and this is what I have.

Scimitar

Slashing cruely inside many infected terrorbirds and roaches.

Goblins

Generally obedient before learning in Neitiznot schools

Feel free to change it if you like. 13:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Hai Lee, what's up? 16:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Kick?
This is the one im talking about User:Clv309/Legaking100 As you can see, christine kicked the other 2 legakings and she did it before even one talked. That is because it was disruption. It's up to you to kick or not. I don't see others doing it. 05:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Birthday
Hi Max, Thanks! Just got my new camera: http://www.ubergizmo.com/photos/2009/2/coolpix-l19.jpg. --. 19:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Minis
That was funny man, nice. Tip: Never sit down with the bag in arms reach. I'm sure you can figure the why.--Degenret01 23:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

RE:Newspaper
Hi. Well, the only reason I changed it to text was the fact that it was rather long. But since it's going to be moved the a shorter link, I guess it should be fine to change it back. I just wanted to make it look a bit neater by shortening it. I'll change it back now. 03:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Idiot
You should probably protect the page "Idiot" from creation. Just thought it'd be a good idea. 18:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Protection of "Idiot"
Per our policy, we don't do pre-emptive protects. While I won't disagree with what you did, I just wanted to make sure you knew policy. 19:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Here it is: Protecting pages preemptively is generally discouraged. Only protect when there is persistent vandalism coming from many IPs/accounts, or if there is an ongoing edit war that is showing no signs of cooling down. Blocks should be used instead of protection whenever possible. 19:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah I noticed that shortly after I posted it, then I went to lunch. =P 20:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

"On This Day..."
I did some formatting to the template you were working on, and visualised the positioning of the template in the Main Page. Check it out at Forum:On This Day. 20:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :)
Thanks heaps for updating my POH page. :) I didn't realise the code had messed up. Although it was a bit surprising for you to go out of your way to fix up... --121.221.73.54 05:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

RE:IP block
Hi. Well I happened to be 80-90% sure that 6 unnoted glory amulets (4) was not a possible drop from Kurasks. I based this on the fact that:
 * 1) I fought Kurasks in-game before and there was no such drop.
 * 2) Speaking with other players while fighting Kurasks. You know, just to pass the time. Questions like "What's the best drop you've ever obtained from a Kurask?" No one ever mentioned such a drop.
 * 3) Checking with the fansites. The fansites do have some reliable information so I went to check RuneHQ and TipIt. It wasn't listed as a drop.
 * 4) It's too good to be true anyway.

Well..those were my reasons. If the IP user was simply experimenting with the wiki, he could have changed it back. He had ample time to do so. I viewed it as quite obvious vandalism (to me, really obvious vandalism is inserting offensive material/nonsense), thus I gave him the 3-day block. 12:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Wait. You do realise that the discussion started 4 hours after I removed that information, right? And regarding the isolated incident matter, umm... maybe take a look at Special:Log/block? Many admins block vandals even if it is their first case of vandalism, because it is rather obvious vandalism. I consider this an exception because it's rather obvious vandalism. 08:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

30 March
What is this edit for? All is does is create an extra line in 30 March. 06:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What I mentioned in the forum was for entries which didn't form a sentence ("Game update: Update title"). I totally forgot to consider the style for full sentences during our discussions in the Forum.


 * For full sentences such as "This thing occurred today.", they would require a period at the end. They would look weird without the period, so I took the liberty of adding a period after each sentence. Made more sense, IMO.


 * The actual reasoning behind the category placement was to minimise transclusion size. Something to do with "post-expand include size" and "template argument size", both of which can be found in the HTML source. Smaller templates/transclusions seem to load faster.


 * Please don't apologise =O I just wanted to know the reason for changing in the placement of the category, which I now know.  15:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Stinko.
Hmm, well it might have been an empty threat, but imo, he should have kept it to himself. It is clearly showing an urge to kick based on personal feelings, and that is not a safe situation to be in. It appears, as of now, that the community is in a unnanimous decision to remove the ranking of Stinkowing in the CC. I might have overlooked an oppose perhaps, but I'm a little busy at work to keep checking back on long pages. Thank you for letting me know. =) 20:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Trolls
May I ask why you unprotected the the troll, Blanothe3rd's, talkpage? He was given more than sufficent time to appeal his ban (from 28 August 2008 - 18 October 2008). In this time, rather than appeal his ban, he spent the entire time slandering me. Once I finally responded he used sockpuppets to vandalise the wiki the next day (and its processes over the following weeks). Blanko has yet to actually serve any of his block, he simply uses proxies at will and has flaunted this numerous times before as well as threaten the wiki and mock its policies. I'm honesty not sure what he has feed you, however, on the other occasions he has come back (asking Instant, Chia, and eventually trying to rally hatred on the forums) I've said "unprotect his talk" and not once have his friends done so. Blanko is a manipulative troll and if there is one action (of every one that I've taken) on this wiki, banning him is the one I've never questioned.-- 21:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree that we now need to make a set timeframe for ban appeal (a month should be fine), however, I feel the entire ban policy should be rewritten. The policy no longer represents the way vandals are dealt with accurately. I've gone and reprotected Blanko's talk. I apologise If I was curt... wait, you unprotected Total's talk? Um, I'll be reprotecting that as well. I'd suggest not unprotecting talk pages of users who have had a long history of disruption and whose bans have been discussed on multiple occasions. Infact, in Total's case, we even had Wikia staff tell us to ban him on sight.-- 23:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Easter
Hi, This is a bit early but because I am going away soon: 08:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Site notices
Well, I know I can't do it on this wiki but on others I can but don't know how. I figured you are an administrator and would know, so how?17:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Traditional Holiday Greeting from Bonzi
11:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)