User talk:Joeytje50

Any useless chat should be placed at this page.

First
I will be first 05:07, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

HAPPY HALLOWE'EN!!!!

 * 1) Death.png
 * Yay, I got the Barrows Icon and 55K crap!
 * 1) [[File:Blaze Sharpeye pyromaniac.png]] My to do list is better than yours, bwahahaha! 08:43, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * nub
 * nub
 * nub (read the description better) 12:19, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Sled/sleigh
Again, it's irrelevant what page it is on. The fact of the matter is that he was attempting to say sleigh, despite the fact that sled and sleigh may be the same thing. Gf. 10:41, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, that's irrelevant. Wikipedia might accept the name as being sled, but the person that actually said "slay" was referring to "sleigh", not "sled". 12:12, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * As I have said, say the words "slay" and "sleigh" out loud and then UCS. I don't know why we are arguing anyways  12:19, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

O hai to your hai to my hai

 * I honestly don't know what that is, that is not my image. 14:20, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Insert some way to respond to an "ah" here* 14:22, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

RS:AGF
I'm talking to him. Everyone makes mistakes, and we have to give him a chance. 18:11, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah. His edits aren't the best, and he doesn't know our policies, but that's the same as any newcomer. If he were to learn how we work...he could make some decent edits. If he doesn't we block, revert, not a big deal. But when it's an option, I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt, and I'll willingly clean up their damage later if I have to, but trust is how we get good editors/sysops. 18:16, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * We perm link past RfAs when we start a new one...just thought you might want to know that. 21:50, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I personally think it's a rather stupid reason to oppose just because we have enough sysops. But if you have reason to believe someone won't actually use the tools, then I could see that being valid. But saying we have _X_ number of sysops, no more until we get to _Y_ number, I think that's really stupid. I'll try and keep my hands of FIMG, because I personally think Caleb is much better at those when he does them. 22:14, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Signatures
I have 2 questions....

How do i make my signature different? People all have different ones :P

Also, How do people get those userboxes?

Scottyman 19:14, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re: First
I already voted... 22:53, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Qbot = bot. Human = ogh wait that was my fault got over-"excited" oops.
Sincerely, -- 13:59, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Now it's your turn.
User:Pharos 5/Editor review/Jeffwang16. -- 14:13, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:List
Why? I don't even update it anymore :/ If you must know, It's on Chess' talk. I posted it ages ago as a collapsible table. - 14:36, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

User:Joeytje50/Guestbook
Please tell me that they don't count. 07:08, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 07:31, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Guestbook
Lol soz. I saw /Guestbook and decided to sign - 07:40, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Your comment
Strong oppose - As your most returning reason is the fact RfBs also use this method for most users, i will treat that first. For bureaucrats, almost the only thing they have more than admins is that they can add users to certain groups. As this is a much easier task than blocking all repetive vandals, deleting files, and whatmore. The things crats can do more each month is about 10 minutes work. The things admins can do more each month is about 7 days(7*24h) for all things added(not each admin of course) Also, additional sysops does not lead to internal conflict, as when evryone strictly follows the policies(which includes RS:UCS)(in which we trust sysops that they do know the policies) there won't be any conflicts. And if there are, the conflicts could be solved on the talk pages instead of a revert/edit war. More sysops is always better, i repeat from other discussions on other places, because when we trust people(without the condition that we need them), we also trust them they make the good decisions, so no conflicts will exist. And when no conflicts exist(which there won't, or atleast not often), what is against more admins? the fact you are not special enough anymore? 23:13, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Enjoy. 20:34, November 2, 2010 (UTC)

Why does your guestbook have to be opening at 3am my local time?! >.<
06:01, November 3, 2010 (UTC)

How did you know I was coming?
http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/matthew2602/cvbgnbgc.jpg  00:09, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Spamz
They iz just sharing the luf. 10:48, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * <3's 2u. 11:20, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

Untrimmed Agility Cape
Heyy, thanks for replacing the untrimmed agility cape image, it's been there for so long and it had armour that I didn't like at all. Looks lots better now :P 11:42, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

PAGENAME
Thanks but it has already been answered. 17:07, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

Your guestbook
Did you see the message I hid in amongst the sigs? 02:56, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know!
It sounded like spanish to me. You know what, I don't use translators. They suck. -- 13:19, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

Not convinced...
I am Chinese so it doesn't work out very good for me. -- 13:38, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

Stealing...
I would much prefer it if you would not accuse me of stealing. Not once did I say that I got the code myself and I have stated to others that I got it from his page. Thank you. 14:12, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

User:Joeytje50/Guestbook
FSWE was a minute early, does that mean he is disqualified? 15:01, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * A second early, thank you. Explanation below. 15:26, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Guestbook

 * 1) I signed after 15:00 underneath.
 * 2) I don't have to. Look: the editing screen was loaded at T minus 5 seconds (I know that, I had the timer in another window). It took me 4 seconds to write " Gimme presents! ~ " and I clicked save at 14:59. The page was saved at 15:00 and like four seconds. But the time part of the signature was apparently saved not at the sime time as the guestbook was loaded, but when I wrote ~ or exactly when I clicked save, whilst I though that it would show the time that the page with my saved edits would appear. So it's a misunderstanding and it was saved at exactly 15:00. Do you understand what I mean?  15:14, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey! You removed both my comments in your guestbook while the second one was valid! Right after Sentra signed, I said something and signed at 15:01! That's unfair! 15:25, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * THANKS!!!! And thank you. (in that order XD) 16:35, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whichever is first: support me as a UOTM (or somebody else) or one of my FIMG noms if you were originally neutral (not opposing), if that's okay.
 * Gimme a bucket 'o coal.
 * Thank you, musch appreciated.
 * 1997 please.
 * I shall make it some day. 16:53, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * You dare steal my power? RAAAARGH! Taste Miasma! Your gods can't help you now! Kind sir, give me my bucket. Love, Bal'lak the Nuk-kul-head. 19:42, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's... black spray in a normal bucket. I want coal, not some floating cloud. >:) 19:10, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ad coal: Was that so hard?
 * Ad noob: Grrbarfugkreeefrmbblllll! 13:37, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Something funny
You're idea of a joke is spamming everyone's talkpages? Well, to each his own. Fine do what you want - 16:25, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Rewards
I want 1337. :3 17:24, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * CAN I HAZ 1242? :D 18:03, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is that the same font with my sig? XD 18:20, November 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Letting me make any picture possible with an Orb of oculus(Glitch, quest and historical images excluded) - A nice picture of me
 * 2) A serious comment in any discussion you want. All discussions are allowed, except for discussions i already commented on - Don't want this one
 * 3) A bukkit or pie of your choice - PIE!!
 * 4) A pie of my choice(inserted below)
 * 5) A number of your choice. If you are the first, you will have the ability to choose 2010. It will only be given to the first requester. 1337 is not a possibility anymore, because it has already been given. - 2010
 * 6) A sign on your own guestbook. - yeh sign my guestbook

01:23, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

1. If you ever have an RFA, you have to oppose yourself for being a nub. And you cant take it back ^_^ - 05:50, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

>_< that woulda been awesome. And yes Joey, i wont revert your spam. Ok? - 11:56, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

How about a serious discussion on the irc nom here. 06:16, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

I'd like...
The number 1. -- 14:20, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Guestbook ate my face, so I an penicillin.
Well, you have already signed my guestbook (though feel free to do it again), but I would like pi to the maximum amount of digits that you do. Porp1 16:00, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Something funny
What a way to start a day, check talk page history for an edit war of you and pharos.. Anyways, I guess I'll choose 5885, since that will be your edit count after you give me that number. 16:01, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

PMF
Could you fix the Beaten tab? You'll see what I mean... BTW, how to use Monaco again? 19:00, November 13, 2010 (UTC)

Moved image
Hey Joey, I moved the dark beast image (File:Horrible beast.PNG) to File:Dark beast.PNG. I can't find the image in your page, so you mind doing it yourself? Thanks! 22:20, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hey!
Where's your sig on my guestbook? I did sign your guestbook within the first 100... 06:15, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * User:Matthew2602/Guestbook You know, it's been on my userpage in bold yellow for like forever... Oh! Okay. 10:59, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Translucency
To transparify rev images, select an area, recolour it and change the tranparency level. Then do that with all the other parts. Simples 12:04, November 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * Wouldn't that take lots of time for some of the more complicated revs? :o (The following might make more sense if you use gimp, however, it probably doesn't make much sense at all anyway) What I did for dragon and beast revs was made a basic background (smudged the colours) of what would have been behind the rev, then cropped it into the shape of the rev using its alpha mask. I put the 'background' layer on top of the original rev layer and set the 'background' to 'Color' mode, making the rev about the same colour as what would have been there. I then put the original rev on top in 'Difference' mode which shows the difference in colour between the 'background' and the original rev (duplicate this as a new layer and hide it for now). This made a rev image with darker parts where there was more transparency and lighter parts where there was less transparency.  I then set the lighter colour of the 'difference' image to alpha which left me with a semi-transparent layer that shows which parts of the final image should be made more transparent. I made the transparency into a mask, and then made the mask to selection and deleted the selection from the duplicated layer. I then changed the colour of this layer so that it matched the colour it should be.  This probably isn't a good way to do it though, I hadn't actually tried it before and I was just experimenting. I hope this helped >.<  13:30, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

re:how?
RC stalking ftw. 12:06, November 19, 2010 (UTC)

Dead tree covered in snow
It's called "Dead tree covered in snow" in game. Please move it back. --Henneyj 19:05, November 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Never mind. Moved back. Henneyj 19:18, November 19, 2010 (UTC)

You must help me once more...
Uhm... hi. :P Could you please fix the obsolete tab of my PMF page? {{R} } isn't really working... 08:39, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * About trans: Still don't get it. :P
 * About {R}: Erm... whoopsie? 10:32, November 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fix. Now.
I mean it. -- 14:14, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:32nd
Grats! :P - 09:46, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * It'll be a long road. I just mastered 7 :P - 11:03, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for believing in me! :D You have now earned the right to demand a rainbow hilite. - 11:07, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Nerd
Errrr, whats your point? - 11:23, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re:CVU
Yes, I did take a look at his contributions. The second most recent edit is about 4 months ago, which means that this may/may not be the same person, seeing as IPs can change. In any case, his latest edit could have been an mistake on his part rather than actual vandalism (and I'm inclined to believe that it was accidental). Even if it was intentional, I'm not going to block him, because honestly, it's too minor an offence. If he does continue however, I will block him. Cheers. 11:24, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

User:Joeytje50/global.js
That only works at Community Central. 14:04, November 23, 2010 (UTC)