RuneScape:Requests for adminship/A proofreader

A proofreader
We all know how helpful and active A proofreader is, both on the wiki and the related media. A proofreader is always seeking to improve the wiki in some way, and when not doing so directly, proof is helping others do so. Nearly all of us have had some interaction with A proofreader, yet I can't recall a single conflict that has arisen between proof and another user. Proof is very active (and constructive!) in wiki discussions on the Yew Grove, IRC, and elsewhere. Proof's productivity and savvy (both in the technical aspects of scripting bots and in wiki policy) has led some to claim proof is a robot, and we may never be certain of the truth. One thing is, however, certain: A proofreader is always seeking to improve the wiki's community through discussions, quality through editing and revising (considering the name this is not surprising), and efficiency through scripting various bots (the Image optimisation bot in particular).

With the above in mind, I find A proofreader's request for adminship long overdue. 04:29, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

''I accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realise that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my tools because I realise that this is a serious offence. If the community finds that I have done so, my tools will be revoked, and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,'' [candidate signs here].

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

2. What have been your most helpful contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?

'''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?'''

4. Should this request be successful, which of the following would you also accept: Username highlight; IRC operator; Clan chat administrator?