RuneScape:Requests for adminship/ZamorakO o

ZamorakO_o
__NEWSECTIONLINK__

ZamorakO_o is a great guy who performs well in all facets of the wiki. First and foremost, he is one of the most active and best countervandalism users that I know, and looking at his contributions I have the utmost confidence in his blocking judgment. The wiki would greatly benefit from another sysop blocking vandals, and Zamorak fits the bill nicely. Furthermore, he performs quite a lot of work in the community aspects of the wiki. He constantly welcomes new users, and frequently shows up in discussions. He offers strong insight, which demonstrates his large capacity for rational thought. I have complete trust in his community judgment, and wouldn't have any hesitation with him closing community discussions. He is also one who isn't afraid to do work. When I needed help to implement a consensus that involved a lot of editing work, he always offered to help. I'm quite pleased with his work ethic. Lastly, I'm impressed by Zamorak's character. He never gets mad and never acts provocative. In fact, his presence often has the opposite effect. He is a very friendly user.

I really can't say enough about Zamorak. In fact, I think the only thing that I don't like about him is his name (I follow this guy). Anyways, it is my pleasure to nominate ZamorakO_o for adminship. 00:53, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

''I accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realise that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realise that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,'' 02:45, January 6, 2011 (UTC).

Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

Basically, whatever needs to be done. Whether it's blocking vandals, deleting unneeded/bad images, or whatever the community decides upon.

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?

Most of them seem to be of equal importance since most of my edits have been "behind the scene" so to speak.

'''3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?'''

I've been in a few issues with Jeff over various little things, and if there has been other issues I've forgotten. I tend to try to handle the situation based on what seems like will work, and if it doesn't work adjust the things til it does.

Discussion
Support - As nominator. 00:54, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support - Full support, Liquid summed it up very well. Cbf waiting for Zammy to sign :P - 00:56, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support - He's almost like me, except not as good. -- 00:58, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Mr. Fake God versus Mr. Seven-Eyed-BLAAAAAARGH-Laser-Firin'-Monster? I'm placing my money on the latter. 00:59, January 6, 2011 (UTC)  Unrelated discussion.   01:02, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Weak support - I'm all in favor of him being a good guy, active in countervandalism, etc. if you're asking why. The only reason why this is weak is because I haven't seen much progress in the way of achieving with Zammy. Still, I think he is a great guy who is active, and I think he will make a great caek! 01:01, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Uotm doesn't count for anything? 0_o - 01:05, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would that affect an RfA?  02:54, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

 Neutral Support - I don't see him doing much that requires "the tools", if I come across something that tells me he does, I'll support. (Time to interrogate him in IRC) After interrogating him, it appears that Zammy would benefit both himself and the wiki by having sysop tools. 02:38, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * That does mean support right? Because you forgot to add it.   03:15, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes it does, thanks for pointing it out, must have been tired after my interrogating  04:43, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support - Good guy and deserves the tools. -- 02:40, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support - We need more active anti-vandals. Smart, mature and ready to do this. 02:54, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support - After some hard consideration (about 20 seconds), I've decided to support. No doubt he would use the tools and use them well. Plus we need more counter-vandal admins, since I'm rather busy these days. 03:15, January 6, 2011 (UTC)