User talk:ElfAnurin/Arch 3

ElfAnurin » Talk

Re:Rune details
Thanks, at least they look a bit better than the old ones. :-) CFLM ( Talk ) 10:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Nomination
Thanks, i guess 10:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * no, I prefer a user that isn't me. he does more than me. 11:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

OH BOY. Well, that is history. I sold my Pith helmet outfit, and started using other costumes. This has all been discussed before you were here. And now, other users are replacing the Pith-images. I don't think that's a problem! And I don't hope that is the only reason Frede nominated me. . 11:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: patrolling
Uh, I have no idea why that appeared. And yes, I should make the date appear in my welcoming template. Thanks for pointing that out. 20:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Animations
Thanks for the "suggestion". I'll find a new background, I'm glad someone agrees, I thought that I was imagining the ugly POH grass... ah, anyways. I'll try someplace else. Tehnoobshow101 17:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Growth stages
No thanks, it's all done. I just need to do something, and then I'll be back to upload the rest.
 * Well, actually I'm doing a re-analysis of whiteberry, for some small problem, and Spirit tree is still under collection. I'm trying to keep all the growth stage images consistent in style though.
 * Z ig z agpaul [[Image:Transportation icon.png]] 10:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Attack skillcape
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoLU8vtCdVM

I'm sure one of the pictures will look familiar to you ... 12:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You're a power ranger :o 14:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Reason why...
I reverted the article because animation was WAY better then your pictures. Once I figured out you delated the animations I undo so why come to my page and post FAIL? I'm not the vandilism kind but I still revert some vandel's. Also, whats your problem with other users. Tell me. Stopping ruining pictures on the wikia. Only 30% of your pictures are good. The rest are FAIL. Be careful what you say. 19:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * When will you learn... 19:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Why bother fighting...your the one who started it anyway. The user refers to me and the pictures...oh my days...I'll just leave it alone and let you do your business but don't step foot in my page AGAIN. Mind your own business 19:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Rollbacking
Yeah, that's the rollback summary. If you think that someone is misusing rollback then you can notify a bureaucrat. Probably Azaz or Dtm right now since Dragon is going on vacation very soon and might not respond for a bit. 19:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I would also like to ask you to refrain from throwing out insults or getting in arguments like you are with Mo. Just ignore them and notify an administrator if there is a problem. 19:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

SORRY
Sorry about the argument. I apologize. 19:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Meh
... Big mess on talk page yay ... >.> .. Just can't ... ... I'm straight to the point yeh, sorry?!? 21:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:FIMG
Oh, thanks for reminding me. I forgot about that. 09:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Levelled
Because we'd spend longer discussing the proposed change and then programming the bot than it would take me to do it manually. 12:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Quick Idea
Just an idea - it'd save space if you made your edit summary smaller. Just somthing like "Fixed Spelling - Tradable to Tradeable" would really suffice instead of a big long message. Just an idea, no need to implement it. 12:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Crossbow
I tried to but it says the file is corrupted? I uploaded it on a new name so any reason why it happened? 16:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * O.O, not sure what happened now. Oh well. Thanks for advice. 16:09, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Every time I see a vandel or mistake and I click edit. I see a username called ElfAnurin. Wonder who this is. Let me know. ;D 14:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice house. Wish I had one like that. 07:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Unblock
I thought about it, but decided against it. If you see the IP's contributions, it made 4 edits to mainspace articles today, 3 of which removed content intentionally. The remaining edit simply signed the article. If you see the contribs before that, the IP left messages on talkpages, indicating that he knew that talkpages were for discussion, etc and is not as much of a Wiki noob as it makes himself out to be. 17:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Tradeable
Haven't you already changed most of the "tradable"s to "tradeable"? According to the discussion, the only ones left are the "tradable"s in infoboxes, and that one can be changed gradually. Correct me if I'm mistaken. 07:48, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Bots are flagged by 'crats, after consensus is reached regarding their use. See here for more info. 17:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. 17:41, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Sitenotice
Sorry about that. The sitenotice said page 8 but the link went to page 9. Forgot to check which one was right. :P Butterman62 (talk) 23:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Your talkpage
Just realized this (also please don't forget my reply above, the new messages button sometimes forgets).

At the bottom of your talk page thing, it says "©2009 ElfAnurin. This design may not be copied without permission of me". I'm pretty sure that this can't be followed, per (and may even be a violation of) Wikia's and RSWiki's GFDL license (icon located at the bottom of every page, including your talk page), which says in a nutshell, "Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts". Just wanted to make sure you knew (so you don't go wondering why people have copied stuff from your page). Butterman62 (talk) 23:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Bot
Your bot is clogging up the recent changes soooo badly. 11:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow, you are really fast. does it take like 0.00000.00000.00000.1 seconds for pages to load on your computer? Lol. 11:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Rfa
You should try for an RFA soon lol. -- 11:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Vandal bomb
They've been dealt with, thanks for letting me know :-) CFLM ( Talk ) 12:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:German
Nein, ich bin nicht deutsch, ich bin englisch but ich just sprechen deutsch sometimes

18:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Lol, Dont Sie bedeuten: ''Hehe, Kein Problem. Ich bin Nicht Deutsch! Ich bin Englisch!''

18:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Blocking
If there was some sort of explanation for the removal, or the information was wrong (I don't agree that it was too odd), then that would have been fine, but they just deleted perfectly good text. I'm inclined to let the block stand (it is only 3 days), but another admin can unblock them if they think it is too harsh. 12:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

re: cleanups
Please excuse my editing style. I edit iteratively and save pages a lot as I edit. I'm most comfortable editing small bits of text at a time instead of making multiple edits at once. 13:21, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

How's things
Just came to to ask. So hows life going. Your doing a great job btw. 13:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fine thanks, I was thinking...due to your great contributions and excellent reverting in vandalism with the welcoming of new guests. Manybe you deserve a admin status. You want to go for it? 13:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Here you go. Good luck. 14:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Doesn't look like it's going good. 14:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: .....
RfAs are a harsh process. You should be prepared to recieve criticism of your edits; the criticisers have nothing against you, they're just doing what they think is best for the wiki. I didn't say all your edits were bad; quite the contrary. I just think that occasionally (a little too often) you haven't assumed good faith when reverting 'vandalism'; often it may well have just been a test edit or misunderstood instructions (error in updating the GEMW, for example).

If you mean my use of Template:No Vandal and Template:Gemw2, etc, then feel free to expand upon your concerns, and I shall try to address them. Thanks, 21:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

wiki war
Did you sign for that time, or just to tell Powers what his time zone is?--Degenret01 07:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:
Actually, its 10 am for me. I found out I'm GMT + 10 now....GRR!! I hate times zones! so confusing! Thanks for helping me out with times. I even got degenret confused with it somehow.... 07:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You got me confused on "More confusing during summer......not GMT.....GMT+1" .... o.O 07:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Lol. You are the first to have called me Bonziiznoob, or to have thought that, lol. Yes, by far I would not consider myself a noob, as I have been playing since 2001, but I am still learning a lot. No, I have not been on the same account all the time. As a matter of fact I have had several accounts however they are exceptionally "Noob" as they were all F2P. I was F2P up until late last year, so I'm new to members. Yes, I have had 3 crackers, a couple party hats, santa hats, scythes, pumpkins, half-wines, disk of returning's, and more. Too bad I never kept any of them :( To know then what I know now. =( 02:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Cards
Haha, thanks.--  NuparuMahnika   08:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Firemaking
Hey, thanks for the heads up, I'll go check on it now :-) CFLM ( Talk ) 09:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

of course
i use paint lolz the only reason all that uneeded space is on it is because im in a rush because i was been attacked by a rev at the time lolz

Re:WARNING
What if a new player or someone who never owned a pet was checking out the page ? They wouldn't know that they could run away and what it needs to be fed with. Also - Following RS:G, everything no matter how small should be added to improve the wiki as a whole. Don't take this personally but whats with your tone of you know everything and anything you don't like is wrong ?? 16:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

No Subject
"You upload a new file, and delete the old file from the article. Now that old file could be used for historical purpose; we can see how the hitpoints bar looked before. So next time you want to replace an image, upload that on the existing file."

I haven't deleted any old files from any of the articles including the hitpoints as well. Though, I did replace it with a better picture representing a certain concept. I had no intention to show off my character what so ever, believe me, I have no need in that. Since you represent a higher authority I kindly leave that image alone.

Recent change
Thanks for that, forgot to change name =D. 16:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Mod what's his name
I thought on this wikia you weren't allowed to have a name starting with "mod", ohh well. --&#123;&#123;Subst:nosubst&#124;Signatures/supirion1}} 10:15, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I have contacted Calebchiam, btw, sorry about being quite rude on your RFA. 10:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Agfing
Hi Elf, sorry, I completely missed those bottom lines - my browser has been acting up and only half-loading some web pages. Switching back to Firefox XD ! Thanks for letting me know :-) cflm (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Policy
Yea, I replied with a support. I am just unsure if we could change policy without consensus. Sorry. 10:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment
If you do not want someone to comment on something, why write it is the first place? Your are basically telling the community that "99.5% of your edits are fine and that is what i should be judged on" That is not what an admin is solely judged upon. It has to do with community, respect, understanding, and responsibility. Edits and edit count are not nearly important as how you treat others on this wiki. ‎Atlandy 14:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * (Edit conflict)Also, when running for RfA, we do base things on the past/present/future. You should also watch your comment on Atlandy's talk page because it seems that you want the tools. That is one thing people do not want to see, wanting the tools. So try to remain calm and keep on improving what you are doing. You are doing well at the moment.=) 14:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I do not understand your comment on user treatment, please expand ‎[[Image:Easter egg.PNG]]Atlandy 14:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's ok. Getting it off your chest feels better right? =). Anyways, I understand you really will do well with the tools and it may be disappointing that you have to watch one oppose after another, but it's not as bad as you might think. When I see opposes, I wouldn't say its a bad vote, but rather something I can try to improve on. Maybe one day, your RfA will see one support after another because the consensus believes that you have improved greatly. Not all the sysops actually pass their RfA during the first time, but that doesn't stop them. They continued to contribute and worked on stuff that people think it needed improve on. So don't get disappointed. I'm sure a lot of people have seen a lot of improvements from you already. =) 15:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Chat moderators
Yeah, we do. The other chat is Chiafriend's but it's up to him if he wants to get users to moderate. Anyway, I've made you a lieutenant in my cc. Hope you can make it for the war tomorrow. 14:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

RFA
You know that on the RFA page, it says "most nominations don't pass first time" and "many friendly adminasrators took more then one RFA" so that means, you still got a chance. Take a look at Bonzinoob, he took 4 RFA, thats because he worked hard from skratch to best. I'm not saying you have any problems but try more. Around 1 month or later, if everythings improved then we'll nominate you again. =D. 15:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
I think you just welcomed a sockpuppet.... 19:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:News
Hmm, even though it's an obsolete update, it is still recent news, so I think it should stay. However, I don't think there is a policy for this, and we could do with one, along with a new template to tag such news items (a note has been added manually to that update, but a proper template would be better). I will bring it up on the Yew Grove in due course. 18:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

ButterBot
You should see the rather interesting message that your bot left on my talk page. :P  13:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, so bots are welcomed differently than regular users. 14:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

The Page Style
I've added a notice of intent on the discussion. When it has expired myself or another admin will decide on the consensus. 18:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

RE:Image Maintenence (or however u spell it)
it might be pointless but some users already have already added trans to some. Some of those have been there for...awhile and it allows users to do something in there spare time. 01:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Main page
"So I work on it for 3 hours and when I'm done you don't even say 1 thing about it. Null. Not even a thank you or a compliment, noooo you throw up even more issues that are wrong with my page. How am I supposed to react on that."


 * I know you are dedicated to this wiki, and I commend you for that. Based on a test I conducted on BrowserShots.org, I had noticed a serious bug (the overlapping icons), and I pointed it out earlier. You have since fixed that. I had other things to do... and I was not following the thread closely.

"you had on your own version of the mainpage"
 * I have my own version, for my own personal use. I created it long before this discussion even took place. I took some of my ideas and gave suggestions to improve on your version. If you read the "more than 100 links is not good" articles I provided in the thread, you would know why I suggested it in the first place. The main reason for the thread, I think, was to increase our Google page ranking by reducing the number of links we have on our Main page.

"But hey you leave me with a problem that I gotta solve. Like how many users with 1024x768 are using monobook skin?"
 * In a wiki, we work together to solve issues and problems. I pointed it out since I did not have the time to provide a solution myself. It does not matter how many users use monobook skin. It is sufficient to know that they are some users who use monobook. Most of the significant changes are based on these two skins: Monaco and Monobook.


 * This is the Main Page, and everyone sees it. This is why designing the Main Page can be tough. You have to consider all types of users and browsers - the largest audience possible.


 * In my opinion, correct me if I'm wrong, you designed the Main Page for users with large screen, based on a popular poll in the Main Page. However, not all users have voted in the poll, and the results you obtained from the poll is not definitive. Even though there were about 1,500 votes, some users may have not voted. We should not rely solely on popular votes.


 * If you ask me, overall the Main Page is nice. Just because some other wiki uses 100x100 icons, it doesn't mean we have to use it. The 75x75 icons are better than the 100x100 icons. The 75x75 icons appear in a line in large screens, and in two/three lines in small screens. This is a good compromise for both types of screens.


 * (Don't get mad at me for saying this.. but) I feel that we should allow other users to come up with alternative Main Pages, so that we have the option of choosing the best of the lot. Having just one design is not enough. I feel that we need a wider audience if we want to implement the changes to the Main Page. 15:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: Welcome
But time always changes, doesn't it? Ah well. :d  18:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nofollow
In order to add rel="nofollow" to internal links then either JavaScript would need to be used (I don't think search engines execute scripts though), or we need to have a wikia developer make the change to the php files. The wiki escapes hyperlinks (Click me!), so I don't believe we can make custom tags without staff help. 22:45, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

my discussion (my talk)
thank you but im not a nooob --Sistemx 03:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)