should funorb's AoG be considered canon? a mod confirmed that it was canon, however, it also seems to conflict canon with things such as falador being around in the 3rd age, unrealistic locations, etc. 
3rd age farcaster 
01:58, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comment As discussed when this game came out, we decided that anything said in AOG does not apply here because of the conflicts and such. They have their own wiki to add their own canon if they wish.--Degenret01 02:12, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comment - thats not being followed. right now there are a number of aog articles, most of which are incomplete. 3rd age farcaster 02:18, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Tag the for deletion, I'll delete them when I get back on in an hour.--Degenret01 02:30, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Recent consensus says otherwise. This does not apply to the monsters in that game, however. C.ChiamTalk 02:46, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
- errr... i tagged them, what should i do? remove the tags?
3rd age farcaster 02:53, March 27, 2010 (UTC) - Yea.....I guess that would be correct until we have a new formal discussion. I am not famailiar enough with all the different elements being listed on this wiki that are actually of not RuneScape origin. So first we need a list of what might already be present here, and a list of sources, then we can discuss each item seperately/as a group. I would say anything that conflicts with known RS lore is out, but we'll save that till we get to the actual proposal. So who knows enough to get this thing going?--Degenret01 03:38, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
- perhaps make pages for em, but have a template at the top that says they are likely not canon? 3rd age farcaster 15:29, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
- errr... i tagged them, what should i do? remove the tags?
- Recent consensus says otherwise. This does not apply to the monsters in that game, however. C.ChiamTalk 02:46, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Keep with template - I proposed the RFD for that AOG character and through the course of the discussion the consensus was to keep these characters on the wiki since they follow the same storyline as the main RuneScape game. The characters are relevant to the history of the God Wars and people wanted to keep them for the sake of being complete in RS canon. Several of the pages can be found by looking through the Canon article. We could add a template that says something to the effect of This article contains information that is not explicitly mentioned in the RuneScape, but is generally considered canon that is relative to the RuneScape storyline. We could add this tag to articles whose sources are Armies of Glienor and even those from Betrayal at Falador, so that people aren't wondering where these characters are in RuneScape. 
Tollerach hates SoF 
21:32, March 30, 2010 (UTC)