m |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
'''Oppose''' - I don't see the problem with them {{Signatures/Starieeena}} 21:08, April 15, 2018 (UTC) |
'''Oppose''' - I don't see the problem with them {{Signatures/Starieeena}} 21:08, April 15, 2018 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' - There's no reason not to have them, and it's nice to be able to look at all updates by date. {{User:KelseW/Signature}} 21:10, April 15, 2018 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:10, 15 April 2018
There are 366 pages of the form 1 January. I can't help but feel that they are quite unhelpful. Essentially they're just disambiguation pages, linking to to a list of events that are completely unrelated to each other, except for a quirk of the calendar. I would therefore like to propose them all for deletion. Since they have many incoming links, this would have to be done in two steps:
- Rebrand them as disambiguation pages, with the usual spiel: "If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article."
- Delete the pages once they have no incoming links.
Of course, since most the incoming links are written in the form [[dd MMMMM]] [[YYYY]], it's possible that a cleanup script could get most of the links pointed to the correct page semi-automatically. (Assuming that the date pages themselves prove similarly easy to parse, and there is only one link per year.) GKFXtalk 21:02, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose - I don't see the problem with them Star Talk 
21:08, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
Oppose - There's no reason not to have them, and it's nice to be able to look at all updates by date. User:KelseW/Signature 21:10, April 15, 2018 (UTC)