 |
This page or section is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. This thread was archived on 23 August 2011 by Liquidhelium. |
The discussion to unblock Parsonsda was closed as unsuccessful. The archived discussion may be found here.
Request to ban Parsonda from IRC/CC/FC
I'm requesting, that after numerous IRC, CC and FC attempts at appealing his ban, which eventually turned into a trollfest/flamefest, that Parsonsda is to be banned for 6 months, adjacent to his current wiki ban, in the Clan chat, Friend's chat and Internet relay chat.
Every single time he enters these chats, he uses the same excuses, and eventually more and more users become involved in the matter, which usually involves in someone flaming somebody.
He's causing disruption, and he said that he won't accept his ban until it's gone. If he wants to appeal his ban, he can do it VIA his talk page or through an admin, I can't see this disruption furtherly happen in the public areas of the wiki.
This is a petty matter of one user being banned, which is being blown up into a massive war of words and heartbreaks. 
Rhys Talk 
16:00, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
- 16th August 2011, Private chat with Liquid
- 16th and 17th August 2011, IRC log (Liquid)
- 17th August 2011, IRC log (Gaz)
- 18th August 2011, IRC log (Warthog)
Support - As Nom Rhys Talk 16:00, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comment - I was actually about to close this thread before I got an edit conflict. User:Stelercus/Signature 16:10, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Also, a add a [[Special:Chat]] ban. --LiquidTalk 16:12, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Comment - Shouldn't this be on a seperate thread? Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 16:21, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - The IRC is more or less just turning into an appeal court for Parsons now. Per liquid. Smuff [kthnxbai] 16:28, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Strong Support - This whole thing is absolutely ridiculous. Almost any other editor would have just accepted the block and moved on. With Parsons, it's a different ordeal, in that he just won't stop. Every single time I go into the FC I have to suffer his monotonous, barely legible, completely ludicrous statements about how his block is unjust, and it has to stop. He's now moved on from an act of martyrdom to outright flaming and abuse, which cannot be tolerated any longer. It's the same situation in the IRC, and were he not incapable of entering the CC, his behaviour would undoubtedly be equally unacceptable there. Furthermore, I support the above proposal that this topic is added to the list of previously rejected proposals, in order to ensure that these unnecessary and completely avoidable arguments all over the wiki and in-game cease immediately. Ronan Talk 16:31, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
- I'd rather stay away from the list of previously rejected proposals. I think that should be more for policy considerations than any specific user. --LiquidTalk 16:35, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - No text even needed for this... --User:Cakemix/Sig 18:18, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
| “ | Will you guys please stop it! i'm doing the 6 month ban, now im relaxed and peaceful, it wasn't in my agreement of this, so close the thread now, im no longer angry, I've left the irc, and i don't wish to take this any further, that is the end of that. | ” |
- Transferred from his talk per request.
@Gaz#7521 20:44, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - Just how many 'last final full stop' chances has he been given? Believe it or not, it's just me... 01:09, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Errr...Did you mean to put this in the top area? This is about banning him from the chats Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 01:16, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Strong oppose Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away, there was an evil man named Palpatine. In a fight he was defeated, and pleaded to his friend to help him. His friend did, and he continued his evil deeds, taking his friend along with him. The Story-Speaker 00:06, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
You're opposing Parsons being banned from the IRC/CC/FC with that argument? Or have you put tthis on the wrong section? Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 00:07, August 19, 2011 (UTC)Wrong section, moved it. The lag makes it hard to edit. The Story-Speaker 00:39, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Support (RIGHT SECTION THIS TIME)- There lives a wizard named Harry Potter. During his third year at the magic school of Hogwarts, he had a chance to kill the man who betrayed his parents, and works for his arch-nemesis. But he ordered everyone to spare him. This very man raised his arch-nemesis from the dead, and commited more acts of evil. Harry Potter, being the kind person he is, let the window of oppertunity slip by... The Story-Speaker 00:46, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh dear, if you're going to support/oppose at least point out why. Powers38 おはようヾ(´･ω･｀) 01:03, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh...it's a metaphor. >_> Powers38 おはようヾ(´･ω･｀) 01:05, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Still, it's much better to be precise about why you're supporting or opposing. Suppa chuppa Talk 01:06, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- If I remember correctly, (spoiler for book 7) Harry is then set free from a dungeon where Voldamort was keeping him by the man he spared for that very reason, though I think they cut that out of the movie for the sake of brevity. User:Stelercus/Signature 01:15, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- He is, but if he didn't free him he might not be in the dungeon in the first place! The Story-Speaker 01:17, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Still, it's much better to be precise about why you're supporting or opposing. Suppa chuppa Talk 01:06, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh...it's a metaphor. >_>
Stay on topic, please. Suppa chuppa Talk 01:18, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - The fourth example is the log I wished I chad copied. You guys basically bullied and harassed parsons, and you want him banned? I realize what he did is wrong, but that's no reason to harass people. I'm very disappointed in both of you. 
Coelacanth0794 Talk 
16:09, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- He's already blocked. He's been harassing all of us for several days now. Do you expect everybody to still be patient now? User:Haloolah123/Sig 18:51, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- In fairness Coel, he shouldn't of been in the IRC in the first place to cause anything like that to happen. He's violated multiple policies including RS:UTP when he threatens murdering any wikians that go to Runefest, and he was breaking RS:UBP by requesting his own unblock for the zillionth time. All I was doing was getting my point of "The answer is a no" across to him. I don't want him to remain in the IRC anymore, playing off of false hope that he'll get unbanned one day through sympathy... About 20 different people have said "No" to him, and he doesn't seem to want to accept the fact. I guarantee you, if Gareth didn't kick him, that log would of went on forever. Rhys Talk 19:10, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
- In fairness Coel, he shouldn't of been in the IRC in the first place to cause anything like that to happen. He's violated multiple policies including RS:UTP when he threatens murdering any wikians that go to Runefest, and he was breaking RS:UBP by requesting his own unblock for the zillionth time. All I was doing was getting my point of "The answer is a no" across to him. I don't want him to remain in the IRC anymore, playing off of false hope that he'll get unbanned one day through sympathy... About 20 different people have said "No" to him, and he doesn't seem to want to accept the fact. I guarantee you, if Gareth didn't kick him, that log would of went on forever.
Comment - He was neither harassed nor bullied, all I saw there was Parsons violating yet more policies, and occasionally throwing in some illegible spam for good measure. The whole wiki is up in arms about his block, and to be frank it's just reaching a ludicrous stage. The amount of infighting over this one ban is abominable, and cannot be tolerated for much longer, which is the main reason I am supporting his ban from the chats above. Ronan Talk 17:52, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Support - I have not seen any activity with Parson lately, yet several users oppose him. However the facts oppose him, he's being disruptive. Youdead0003:17, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
Closed - The sole opposition point has been addressed. Furthermore, even if harassment had taken place, it would have been long after the infractions committed by Parsonsda, and therefore should not affect the resulting consequences of those infractions. Therefore, Parsonsda will be banned from the Internet Relay Chat channel, the Clan Chat channel, the Friends' Chat Channel, and the Wiki Chat until his block on the wiki expires. --LiquidTalk 16:04, August 23, 2011 (UTC)