No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:: There is a thread for criteria for instant approval, but it has not achieved consensus yet due to a lack of activity. {{Signatures/Tebuddy}} 01:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
:: There is a thread for criteria for instant approval, but it has not achieved consensus yet due to a lack of activity. {{Signatures/Tebuddy}} 01:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::Tebuddy, if you remember my [[Forum:Start relationships with Rune HQ or other fan sites|little partnership discussion]] I started, it had reached consensus. That thread was very active at the same time so really enigma is right. {{Signatures/Kalindrum}} 10:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 10:40, 29 August 2009
Request for link exchange
Please, consider link exchange with Runescape sites I maintain:
1. Runewise (http://www.runewise.net/) - this fan site provides unique services to the players and is approved by Jagex. The site is almost 3 years old. It does not have (and never had) any ads.
2. Runescape Reader's Digest (http://runescapereader.blogspot.com/) - this is a daily blog where I feature interesting Runescape related articles, blog posts, interview, forum topics etc. The blog is two years old with 650+ entries. It has Google ads, but no RWT ads.
I believe that both sites satisfy the link exchange criteria described in the other topic here.
Thank you!
Vaskor 02:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Vaskor
Discussion
Support - Meets the link critera, Jagex approved, owner seems like a nice person, just the type of site we are looking for 
TEbuddy 02:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per TEbuddy. User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 03:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Support - Seem fine to me. 
Oil4 Talk 08:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Support - Both seem like a good thing. I tried out RuneWise for a while and the skilling tips were both humorous and truthful. ~MuzTalk 23:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per all the above. --Quarenon Talk 23:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment - Thank you very much for the support! I am not entirely sure how long the voting takes, but I went ahead and added the links to all sites. If I am too early, please, let me know and I'll fix it back. --Vaskor 23:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Vaskor
- We typically allow a few days, but the support seems to back your move. Please do not get comfortable yet, some users who have not been present today may voice there opinions on the matter in the coming days. 00:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Support - I have seen Vaskor around before and have looked at both sites before in the past. It's a well developed community and a friendly atmosphere and I see no harm in forming a link exchange.
00:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment - Do we even need consensus? Haven't we already decided that if fansites are willing to attain a relationship it doesnt require community consensus? — Enigma 00:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is a thread for criteria for instant approval, but it has not achieved consensus yet due to a lack of activity.
TEbuddy 01:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Tebuddy, if you remember my little partnership discussion I started, it had reached consensus. That thread was very active at the same time so really enigma is right.
Mo 55 55 Talk|Sign 10:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- Tebuddy, if you remember my little partnership discussion I started, it had reached consensus. That thread was very active at the same time so really enigma is right.
- There is a thread for criteria for instant approval, but it has not achieved consensus yet due to a lack of activity.
