Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
'''Comment''' - Sorry, but I cannot take anything that consists of "Make ? Great Again" serious. I did think [[Forum:Return of the Spoilers]] was clever though. {{Signatures/Salix of Prifddinas}} 20:37, February 13, 2017 (UTC) |
'''Comment''' - Sorry, but I cannot take anything that consists of "Make ? Great Again" serious. I did think [[Forum:Return of the Spoilers]] was clever though. {{Signatures/Salix of Prifddinas}} 20:37, February 13, 2017 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Oppose''' - some ideas just need to be exorcised, cremated, and flushed down the ........ while I agree that the titles are overly technical, sometimes THAT is what makes them clear. It's not easy for some of us to come up creative titles that ALSO explain what we're trying to get across. --[[User:Deltaslug|Deltaslug]] ([[User talk:Deltaslug|talk]]) 04:21, February 15, 2017 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 04:21, 15 February 2017
No one other than Mol answered my call to arms last year. And I'm pretty sure the two he made were sarcastic. Looking at the forum archives, there's no thread with a creative title. 
Come on guys, we can do better. Let's MFTGA. --LiquidTalk 20:57, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
Discussion
Comment - Bonus points to anyone who actually manages to make a serious proposal with a cool title. --LiquidTalk 20:57, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
can we not - Mol's ideas were stupid and trolly. https://i.imgur.com/7kyt1iT.gif --WINE OF GOOD HEALTH (Actually Stinko) 21:07, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
- But at least his titles weren't dead boring. Forum:Mono👻k icon Forum:💣💣💣Video format discussion -- eXtreme boogaloo💣💣💣 --LiquidTalk 21:10, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
- I'm going to say this very plainly, but I can't tell if you're being serious at all with this thread (I hated those silly titles...). https://i.imgur.com/7kyt1iT.gif --WINE OF GOOD HEALTH (Actually Stinko) 21:11, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
- Forum:Mono👻k icon was my thread you turd, not Mol's --Iiii I I I 20:57, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
no - because you ignored ignored mentioning my totally great forum name I made just for you in this thread. Bad helm. Pls go. 
Archmage Elune TalkHS 
fetus is my son and I love him. 21:21, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
- Oops my bad, totally forgot that one! Jim gets credit for not being boring. --LiquidTalk 21:23, February 9, 2017 (UTC)
Deport all forum titles back to Syria. --User:Saftzie/Signature 08:17, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
- Get 'em outta here! — Heaven Sent (talk) 13:07, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - Back to being a noob I see. If you wanna make titles interesting then do so, but it should still remain a header for the subject. 
Coelacanth0794 Talk 
13:32, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - ...please. That one with the three bombs is an atrocious title because good luck finding it in any search bar. 
Fswe1 
14:51, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
Stop - http://i.imgur.com/aXpnIjk.png --
Scuzzy Beta
20:52, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
- Can I request a closure on somebody else's thread? No? Okay... --Scuzzy Beta 20:59, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
- it's time to stop!
Archmage Elune TalkHS fetus is my son and I love him. 14:44, February 14, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Lmao boooi ^ Panjy16 ★ 23:11, February 11, 2017 (UTC)
Comment - Sorry, but I cannot take anything that consists of "Make ? Great Again" serious. I did think Forum:Return of the Spoilers was clever though. Salix of Prifddinas (Talk) 20:37, February 13, 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - some ideas just need to be exorcised, cremated, and flushed down the ........ while I agree that the titles are overly technical, sometimes THAT is what makes them clear. It's not easy for some of us to come up creative titles that ALSO explain what we're trying to get across. --Deltaslug (talk) 04:21, February 15, 2017 (UTC)