Forums: Yew Grove > RS Classic NPCs
Replacement filing cabinet
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 3 April 2010 by Calebchiam.

Should pages about RS Classic NPCs be on this wiki? Isn't it more suitable to put it on the RS Classic wiki? Just wondering about pages like: Tom, Sam (certer) I understand why pages like partyhat would exist, since it was brought over into RS2, but if the RSC NPCs are no longer on RS2 isn't it a bit unnessecary? Thanks,

  1. REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 19:39, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - It's a bit hard to say. I for one think that all the RuneScape 2 and RuneScape Classic information should be kept one one wiki; here. Although I've taken a look at the RSC wiki and applaud its editors for their extraordinary work, I still think we should document RSC information here. Chicken7 >talk 07:03, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - RSC is also RS, so I say we should have that information. Ancient talisman Oil4 Talk 09:23, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - As Oli said, RSC is RS, just an older version. So we should keep the NPC's, but I don't think we need all the RSC information on here, there are huge differences between RSC and RS2. bad_fetustalk 10:09, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - It's always nice to see how the game has evolved. I think we should keep them here, it's part of the games history.  Swiz Talk 12:05, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Keep all RSC information here - It's the same game. User:C Teng/sig 12:40, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, they should be on the Wiki - If there were updates that were made in RSC but not mainstream RS, I'd agree that they might belong in a separate wiki. But the reality is that RSC content has at some point been part of mainstream RuneScape. So what separates it from other abandoned updates that have occurred since the RS2 first arrived? In my opinion, obsolete updates are not suitable under a game-manual view of the wiki, but under the encyclopedia view of the wiki, they're an absolute necessity. They're general interest. Think about Wikipedia removing any article about extinct animals! But if an obsolete update contains manual-like information (such as, how best to kill a monster that doesn't exist any more) that part of the content could go. Endasil (Talk) @  18:55, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Keep - They were once part of RuneScape, and if we remove those, we will lose a big part of the RuneScape history. scoot4.pngscooties 03:05, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yes - They are RuneScape Classic NPCs, thus they should be on the RuneScape Wiki. --
Water Wave icon
Captain Sciz
TalkEditsHiscores File:Runecrafter hat.png|link=
18:20, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Support They should have somting after them showing thats its from rsc like for example general_store_(RSC) or something like that to show its different. User:Supawilko/SkillSupawilko 22:35, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Support - In my view all content from the RSC wiki should be moved to this RuneScape Wiki preferably under a RSC: namespace but I understand the admins are reluctant to create more namespaces. --Gold ore Mercifull UK serv (Talk) 09:25, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - RSC information should be documented here. C.ChiamTalk 03:22, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.