(→Discussion: +support) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
'''Support''' - I was thinking the same thing. Although I'm not so sure about moving them into the Project: namespace; I think Forum may be better, if not just for categorisation purposes. Stickies could become very useful if [[User:Chicken7/YG threads proposal|this]] is implemented. {{^^}} {{User:Chicken7/sig}} 02:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC) |
'''Support''' - I was thinking the same thing. Although I'm not so sure about moving them into the Project: namespace; I think Forum may be better, if not just for categorisation purposes. Stickies could become very useful if [[User:Chicken7/YG threads proposal|this]] is implemented. {{^^}} {{User:Chicken7/sig}} 02:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | '''Support, leave in Forum namespace''' - Yeah I think stickies should generally be for some sort of pressing discussion, whether it be time-sensitive or far-reaching. Archives and previously rejected are neither. I think previously rejected deserves a link in the YG header, but its not an active discussion, so there's nothing to discuss. I think the YG Arcives should have been archived a long time ago, since it's just very old discussions. I think both still belong in the Forum namespace since they are at least collections of YG discussions and the seem out of place in the Projectspace. Cheers, {{Signatures/Tollerach}} 19:46, April 1, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:46, 1 April 2010
I find it rather silly that Forum:Yew Grove Archives and Forum:Previously rejected proposals - READ THIS BEFORE YOU POST have been stickied forever, considering that they are not actually discussion forums. I find that it would be easier to make links to those pages (as well as moving those two pages into the Projectspace, as they are not discussion forums in the least bit) above the stickies section. I would also like to propose that we try and make more use of the stickies section, an example of doing this being:
- Adding stickies to threads that are considerably urgent.
- Adding stickies to threads that represent a larger change to the wiki as a whole compared to the majority of topics, such as when we where discussing skinning the wiki.
User:Stelercus/Signature 14:49, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
Comment - How on earth do you skin a wiki? It's not an animal. --LiquidTalk 16:07, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
- We used a special tanning tool called CSS. User:Stelercus/Signature 16:12, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comment - Isn't the READ THIS BEFORE YOU POST also a discussion? We could discuss there which topic should go on the page. 
Oil4 Talk 16:14, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
- In the past it appears that we have done that on the forum we want to add to the list, in one way or another. User:Stelercus/Signature 16:15, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should change that. Oil4 Talk 16:16, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Why not have a different thread for each addition to the list? Having it all in one will get very confusing very quickly. User:Stelercus/Signature 16:20, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should change that.
Support - I was thinking the same thing. Although I'm not so sure about moving them into the Project: namespace; I think Forum may be better, if not just for categorisation purposes. Stickies could become very useful if this is implemented. 
Chicken7 >talk 02:28, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
Support, leave in Forum namespace - Yeah I think stickies should generally be for some sort of pressing discussion, whether it be time-sensitive or far-reaching. Archives and previously rejected are neither. I think previously rejected deserves a link in the YG header, but its not an active discussion, so there's nothing to discuss. I think the YG Arcives should have been archived a long time ago, since it's just very old discussions. I think both still belong in the Forum namespace since they are at least collections of YG discussions and the seem out of place in the Projectspace. Cheers, 
Tollerach hates SoF 
19:46, April 1, 2010 (UTC)