FANDOM


Clan Citadel

current
replacement 1
Tony
replacement 2
replacement 3

Previous discussion: Here.
Reason: Per the previous discussion's desires, this has more fancy plinths and statues. Unfortunately I couldn't get them all fully visible because of the banners, but this looks good enough, methinks. Also I took the liberty of enabling bloom and lightning sparks to the portal. I think it looks pretty neat.

  • Support - As nominator. 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 13:44, July 14, 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose/shameless plug for RSW citadel - If we're going to feature customization on the statues (that is, not the default portal without statues) we might as well use the clan's citadel. :) --LiquidTalk 15:02, July 14, 2017 (UTC)
Er...not sure if serious, sorry. I'd say GWD plus a mage is pretty iconic, though. Not to mention pretty. But you're not really opposing because it isn't the wiki's citadel, are you? :d 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 17:40, July 14, 2017 (UTC)
The wiki's GWD layout is better, with Nex in the middle flanked by the 4 other generals. --LiquidTalk 16:05, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
I'll go retake it then. Maybe. :P But I don't see why the Scrying Pool version isn't better than the original. ;P 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 16:36, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
I've just retaken one from the RSW clan citadel (Entered in as guest since not part of clan), ended up with this result. Abyssal vine whip TonyBest100 Bandos chestplate 16:38, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - Added replacement 2 suggestion to the nomination, on Liquid's request. Also, I turned off scenery shadows because they looked out of place. Getting the lightning zaps right was really frustrating... EDIT: Just discovered Tony beat me to it, but I think the new one mimics the old angle better. And the statues have misplaced LD as if made of metal rather than stone in his version too. Just a detail but eh. 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 18:30, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
The problem with yours though is that it's Java, which would mean it'd need retaking anyway due to NXT being the preferred client choice for all images now. Abyssal vine whip TonyBest100 Bandos chestplate 18:45, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't really matter, does it? As a rule of thumb, NXT is preferred by policy. If consensus determines a Java version (or blue cheese version for all I care) and everything else is the same, then, well, duh. 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 19:41, July 16, 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment - Apparently someone (the suspects are me, Gareth, and Ryan M - I didn't do it and Ryan probably hasn't touched the citadel in years) replaced the Graardor statue with a Kal'gerion statue. I've placed an order for a Graardor statue again to complete the GWD holy pentinity (is that a word?) but unfortunately the order won't go through until the next build tick. :( --LiquidTalk 15:43, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
Since this has apparently become a Nomination for Liquefaction, would you like it to be retaken with or without bloom and scenery shadows? :P I'd prefer with and without respectively. 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 17:50, July 17, 2017 (UTC)
  • shrug* I literally don't care about the presentation of the image, I'm only interested in the subject. --LiquidTalk 00:21, July 18, 2017 (UTC)
Added. Previous angle was impossible with Graardor though. Weirdest FIMG nomination ever. :P 18px-Avatar.png Fswe1 26px-Brassica_Prime_symbol.svg.png 07:45, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
Just attempted to see if I could get one with the original suggested angle but Graardor doesn't really suit that angle, so I also took one with a more centered approach which does show it a bit better. Abyssal vine whip TonyBest100 Bandos chestplate 13:11, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
Can I just say I'm glad Gareth didn't try to troll me by switching the citadel to night? Also thanks you guys, the pictures look great! ^_^ Now go get others to show up and comment so that there can be some kind of consensus rather than a few guys dicking around with too many options. --LiquidTalk 14:55, July 20, 2017 (UTC)
  • Extended by 1 week - As the final proposed option was literally just uploaded. Also, more people need to comment. --LiquidTalk 00:36, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
  • Closed - It's abundantly clear no one cares about this. I guess we'll replace it with the most recent suggestion, which, if I'm not mistaken, is this. If anyone really strongly objects, leave a complaint here. --LiquidTalk 01:29, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
,
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.