RuneScape:Featured images/archive-obsolete

This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current project page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.

Nominations for replacement

K'ril Tsutsaroth

K'ril got himself an update today. Per Forum:Obsolete featured images, the old image will be delisted, and there is an opportunity now to choose a replacement. The new version ~~while functional~~ is ~~not~~ of great quality. ~~I would encourage someone with good graphics and image-taking skills to take a better shot.~~ All non-FIMG uses of the old image have been replaced. ʞo oɔ

Okay - Fine, do the new one, but I like the old one more... Fsw e1 14:14, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
Support new image - but could you trans it first please? Pokmnbogroll ^Talk ^{Adv log} Sign here plawks and don't forget to vote 20:21, September 16, 2011 (UTC)
Support the new image - And i'm not just saying that because its my image :P. Wahisietel (Talk) 08:29, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Obvious decision... Who want's good ole 2003 demons back? Not I :D Rhys ^Talk 11:29, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Epic image -> Epic updated image. Loving the new style K'ril!
Wingcap
12:28, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - New one looks LIKE A BOSS. :D ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 15:53, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
Do it. The new one looks better than the old one. --Andorin (Talk) (Contribs) 21:55, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - --クールネシ^トーク 23:19, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
Support - this is a no-brainer, new > old King^TALKWer den König nicht ehrt, ist nicht Lebenswert. 05:42, September 19, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Per all.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 11:22, September 19, 2011 (UTC)

Support - Ya. Ronan^Talk 22:02, September 22, 2011 (UTC)
Closed - The updated image will be featured. Sentra246 09:22, September 23, 2011 (UTC)

Al Kharid Palace

[[File:Al-Kharid_Palace_new.png|250px|thumb|New]]

Reason: It's obsolete..

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 11:00, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Yes. Ronan^Talk 11:09, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support AnselaJonla 12:27, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support - I want a front view though. Fsw e1 15:10, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support - --クールネシ^トーク 19:33, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Do it! King^TALKWer den König nicht ehrt, ist nicht Lebenswert. 02:13, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Obvious reason to update. :P ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 04:11, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Do I need to write out a reason? Hofmic Talk 04:17, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Looks cool, better than the previous one anyway. Sentra246 07:27, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Duh

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 06:22, November 5, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Image will be replaced. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 16:23, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

Kharidian Desert

[[File:Kharidian Oasis.png|thumb|250px|New]]

Reason: Obsolete. That camel is rather annoying too..

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 11:21, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support - new image is better AnselaJonla 12:26, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Weak support - It has a different feeling. I like it though. Fsw e1 15:11, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Agree with Ansela. User:Exor Solieve 02:10, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Do it! King^TALKWer den König nicht ehrt, ist nicht Lebenswert. 02:13, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Gonna miss that camel, though. D: ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 04:15, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Camel, you will not be missed. Also support speedy replacement: obsolete images on our mainpage is bad. Hofmic Talk 04:23, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Mmmmmmmmmmmmhm

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 01:35, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Image will be replaced. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 16:30, November 9, 2011 (UTC)

Enchanted valley

[[File:EnchValleyWF new.png|250x250px|right|Replacement]]

Description: Example.
Reason: Water update.

Support - As nominator. Spine^Talk 22:33, December 7, 2011 (UTC)
oppose - water texture is much worse. --Iiii I I I 02:25, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

That doesn't change the fact that the previous image is outdated. bad_fetus^talk 19:29, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

Support - New textures are pro, ja? --クールネシ^トーク 03:08, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - If it's not new, then it shouldn't be replaced at all. --クールネシ^トーク 13:34, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Support - Duh! King^TALKWer den König nicht ehrt, ist nicht Lebenswert. 03:31, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Weak oppose - New water looks fake. Delist it altogether and replace it by that other image, which has a much better Ngle. Fsw e1 08:07, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Support - If this is to replace the old with the new, more glorious one. :D 169.241.28.79 20:33, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Replace and delist -Both versions are ugly. That said, the older version is obsolete, which means that we should not use that version anyways.bad_fetus^talk 19:29, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Comment - You guys mean this one? -- Spine^Talk 00:56, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

^Support.

Fsw e1

11:47, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - Is your water detail broken or something? Anurin _{Talk · Sign! .} 16:59, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

The replacement is on the top, and the old one is on the bottom. Suppa chuppa ^Talk 18:57, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Yep.

Anurin _{Talk · Sign! .} 21:26, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comment - This wasn't taken on Directx so the water texture is no where near as good as it potentially could be. --Henneyj 06:46, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
like so --Henneyj 17:51, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comment - The water is not obsolete so i have moved it. Wahisietel (Talk) 08:37, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Image delisted. Suppa chuppa ^Talk 02:40, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Baxtorian Falls

[[File:BaxtorianWaterfalls New.png|250x250px|right|new]]

Description: Sample description.
Reason: Water update.

Support - As nominator. Spine^Talk 02:10, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Support - Sure King^TALKWer den König nicht ehrt, ist nicht Lebenswert. 02:11, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Support - The water actually looks real now.

REDIRECT User:N7 Elite/Signature 02:11, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - I don't like the new one, it doesn't look as nice. ɳex undique 02:12, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - Sorry, but I can see too much ground with the new water. Also, lack of particles where the water crashes at the lake is a disappointment, at least the current attempts to have them. Coelacanth0794 Talk 02:13, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, changed to Delist altogether. Per a couple people.

Coelacanth0794 Talk

02:03, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Delist - They look terrible. Suppa chuppa ^Talk 02:14, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - I consider water to currently be still in development, and it currently looks terrible. Wahisietel (Talk) 07:36, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - Looks terrible. Also, the water on top is not shallow enough. And I don't like the angle. I'll retake it when this is finished, unless you want to do it yourself, of course. Fsw e1 15:07, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delist - Was considering nominating this for delisting anyway, also the water at the bottom of the waterfall doesn't look all that realistic Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 15:09, December 9, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - In your new screenshot you completely switched off Water Detail :s The original image looks nicer, and perhaps the area will receive a facelift with the upcoming Gnome Stronghold graphical update. Anurin _{Talk · Sign! .} 16:42, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

The replacement is on the top, and the old one is on the bottom. Suppa chuppa ^Talk 18:57, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Support - Newer water is always better water. --クールネシ^トーク 21:52, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - The water in the newer image is just some graphical setting...

Delist - Neither image is at a featured image standard, it just doesn't look that great. Sentra246 02:01, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Comment - The water is not obsolete so i have moved it. Wahisietel (Talk) 08:37, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - It's not obsolete, it's just some kind of graphical glitch. Besides.. this is better then either of them. I propose we replace it with that instead. Wahisietel (Talk) 08:56, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

I like that, but I think it needs more surroundings, with trees and grass instead of plain brown rocks.

Fsw e1

11:48, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Delist - Bland image, nothing "wow" about it. The Last Pun ^Talk 17:54, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Image delisted. Suppa chuppa ^Talk 02:41, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Stone Circle

[[File:Stone Circle new.png|thumb|250px|updated image]]

Reason: Troll Warzone has made it obsolete, and the new version looks much nicer.

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 10:23, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Support - A tad bit brighter would be nice, but it still is a lot better. Hair 13:02, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Much better. --クールネシ^トーク 20:34, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
Super Support - Jagex really did a great job with these graphics! :D ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 01:27, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I love its serenity besides those tents to the left, though that's kind of unavoidable. The Last Pun ^Talk 02:13, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Sure.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 08:53, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I do like that light... Fsw e1 19:04, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
Support - image is obsolete JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 09:16, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Looks a lot more pleasant and natural Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 22:39, February 6, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - Image replaced. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 00:28, February 8, 2012 (UTC)

TzHaar

[[File:TzHaar_entrance.png|250x250px|right|Suggested replacement|thumb]] Description: This is an image of Tzhaar before the graphical update. I think it should be delisted
Reason: This image is from before the update, and is therefore obsolete.

Support - As nominator. Scaper12123 15:18, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Obvious change. ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 05:52, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Because it only has two colours and looks somewhat ugly. That said, I disagree that we should delist images only because they were updated. I thought the idea was to show how great things look on RuneScape. I don't see the relevance of being obsolete or not. Anyways, this image is fairly boring bad_fetus^talk 16:49, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Notice of intent - Nomination extended until 31 February 2012. Users have a week to suggest replacements for this image. If no suggestions get adequate consensus, then the image will be delisted per consensus.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 06:04, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Suggested replacement - Admittedly it's not a shot of the inside like the current image, but it shows what TzHaar culture is like, in terms of architecture, art, as well as signifying their historic and social links with lava Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 12:18, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
Support replacement - It works pretty well. --クールネシ^トーク 14:02, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Support replacement - Looks cool. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 19:12, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Support replacement - per Fergs AnselaJonla 19:14, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Support replacement - Yup.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 19:16, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support replacement - Looks nice besides the lava cut off at the bottom. The Last Pun ^Talk 04:36, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
Support replacement - Not what it used to be, but a very cool image. Shiny. Fsw e1 11:26, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The image will be replaced with the suggested replacement. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 23:26, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Falador Park

Old

New

Reason: Cyrisus was updated, new water..

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 10:51, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose of the strong kind - I'd rather not replace a contrasting, well captured pond with an indistinct puddle. Ronan^Talk 11:11, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - Water looks blue in RS. I like how the blue contrasts with the green and white. This makes it brown with some white dots. =( Fsw e1 11:25, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - The water makes it look really bad Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane

Oppose - --クールネシ^トーク 21:08, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
Question - Is the water actually obsolete, or did you just take it with say, DirectX as opposed to OpenGl?

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 06:00, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

No, the water is not obsolete, I just took it with DirectX as opposed to OpenGL, which should be done as per consensus. I now realize that i appear to have had lighting detail off when i captured the image.. Apologies for that.

Wahisietel (Talk)

18:32, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

An honest oppose- I don't think a brown, horrible indistinct looking puddle deserves to be nominated (possibly replace, I don't really understand this... :P) a picture that actually looks distinct and also is the colour of water. I seriously meant what I just said.

REDIRECT User:Neitiznot/Signature

Delist - Water is ugly, per others. User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 23:02, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delist for this image - If this is the final image to replace this FIMG, I oppose, especially because the water isn't blue and doesn't even look like water. This is likely due to the angle though, so I'll try retaking it with a slightly different angle and nominating it as replacement below. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 09:57, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comment: The Gnome raphical update has made Hazelmeres statue obsolete again.... Wahisietel (Talk) 14:24, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Moved nomination - I uploaded another version because this one got opposes only because of the water, and because Hazelmere was outdated. The new nom page can be found here. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 15:21, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

TzRek-Jad

[[File:Tzrek-Jad_replacement.png|250px|New|right]]

Support' - As nominator. Fsw e1 15:42, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - Add trans first. Wahisietel (Talk) 16:00, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Now now this nomination still has six days left on it. Let's give the imagemakers some time to add transparency before opposing for that reason. --Liquid^Talk 16:10, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

You can't change a nominated image during a nomination can you..?

Wahisietel (Talk)

16:22, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Not for something major, but for something like applying transparency I don't see an issue. --Liquid^Talk 16:25, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Trans'd. :)

Fsw e1

16:27, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Good job capturing the same pose and angle. I miss the lips... User:Exor Solieve 05:44, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I like it. :P ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 05:53, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - The current version is plain ugly. bad_fetus^talk 16:47, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I like this new version. No more of the lips that the old TzRek had. Although it's harder seeing this one turn into an adult Jad. Ryan PM 07:13, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
Replace and delist - Per Chess. --クールネシ^トーク 13:39, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Awesome new pic. Haidro ^(talk) 01:28, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Better looking image if not quite as cute Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 12:19, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - New image just doesn't look as good in my opinion. Sentra246 12:21, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - new version is ugly as sin AnselaJonla 19:12, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
Support replacement - I actually like it.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 19:29, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I like the new one. Hair 03:25, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Time extended - There's quite a bit of discussion here, but I'm not comfortable closing it just yet. Expiration extended one week. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 23:25, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - The pet doesn't look cute anymore. The cute lips are gone. --Liquid^Talk 23:28, March 1, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Dunno why it was extended, there seemed to be consensus to replace it, with 8 supporting replacement and 3 supporting delisting, with no particularly strong reasons besides "looks good/bad", but hey, I like it, so support. Hofmic Talk 02:08, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
I believe I explained why. 4-8, if counting, would be barely enough for a rough consensus. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 03:43, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - The new version looks a bit odd because it is excessively glossy and has a duller red. 222 ^talk 09:55, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - This image will be replaced and will remain featured. Sentra246 09:59, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Falador Park

Reason: Cyrisus and Hazelmere were updated, DirectX water.

Support - as nomnomnom JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 15:21, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Support' -' Looks better. Neitiznot ▸ Choose OptionMy userpage Talk to me! Spam goes here Sign here! 17:57, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral - Water is ugly, no texture... Fsw e1 20:08, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Better water is better picture. --クールネシ^トーク 20:46, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Looks good to me. n__n ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 23:34, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Water may be better on the old but the new looks fine Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 18:03, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Sure.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 21:10, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Improvement. 222 ^talk 09:57, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
Closed - Image will be replaced. --Liquid^Talk 15:19, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

Dragonfire shield

Description: Sample description.
Reason: Obsolete

Support - As nominator. Spine^Talk 00:50, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - The face used to be distinct and really stand out, now the shield is just a dull arrangement of colour. Not our fault, but that doesn't mean we should keep it featured. --Henneyj 01:11, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - It really changed, but not for the better... --クールネシ^トーク 01:58, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - The "example.png" page name really caught my attention , but yeah, nothing remarkable. Unlike nessie, I think the change was for the better, but it's never been a particularly interesting image. Hofmic Talk 02:01, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Conditional Support (otherwise Delist) - I like the new one's appearance, but that angle really bugs me. ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 03:17, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comment - It passed over my head that the image doesn't have particles, even though the (much better looking) charged DFS does. Would have been a better choice to use an image with the particles, which would add more colour (kinda). Also nice to see this page as something that isn't example.png. Hofmic Talk 03:32, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
delist - It no look like dragon no moar!
Ameobea10^{Talk • Contribs • #}
03:34, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Didn't like the old one being featured, this one just looks worse. Sentra246 05:39, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - I have to agree with some others here. The DFS used to be almost the coolest looking armour piece in the game, but now it just doesn't look good enough to be FIMG anymore. Sadly, this would mean we'd have to delist one of the few item FIMGs, but it's just not good enough to be FIMG anymore. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 09:52, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Support old, delist new - Honestly, what's wrong with historical FIMG? Fsw e1 20:09, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Ugly as a toad-cockroach hybrid. Yeah. User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 21:47, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Didn't like old, don't like new. The Last Pun ^Talk 23:59, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Neither of them look FIMG worthy Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 18:07, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
Delist -

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 21:09, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Screwed up like half the other new shield designs. 222 ^talk 09:56, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - As previously stated; there are no particles. The charged one does. (Also stated) It also looks horrible now. I don't think it should be FIMG anymore. Neitiznot ▸ Choose OptionMy userpage Talk to me! Spam goes here Sign here! 21:17, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I personally like it... Hair 23:42, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
Closed - The original image will be delisted; the new image will not be featured. --Liquid^Talk 15:20, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

Musician

[[File:Lonely Musician new.png|250x250px|right|New|thumb]]

Reason: New trees, eyes

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 17:17, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Good replacement, but the new trees are just evergreens. It used to be magically elfy, now it's just a forest. Fsw e1 17:41, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - I agree with Fswe, it's not mystical anymore. Just a random forest with no grass and a few rocks. The musician looks randomly misplaced in the middle of nowhere, whereas before she was in the tall grass/twigs. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 00:48, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - It's just boring now.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 05:17, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - --クールネシ^トーク 19:43, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral - I like the new one. It looks nice. But the old one had some much taller grass and more unique trees and rocks. ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 04:41, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - *Yawn* Hofmic Talk 04:53, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Didn't think the previous image was really that FIMG-worthy, the replacement defiently isn't Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 15:17, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Now it's plain and doesn't really stand out. The Last Pun ^Talk 04:29, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The image will be delisted Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 11:27, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Isafdar(4)

http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/6774/isafdarelf.png

Replacement image

Description: The elven forest with its beautiful nature.
Reason: The trees received a graphical upgrade so this obsolete image needs to be replaced.
Previous nominations: First - Second - Third nomination

Support - As nominator. Anurin _{Talk · Sign! .} 13:07, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - The blue grass and water rather ruin it... Wahisietel (Talk) 17:42, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Looks clearer and better (although I liked the old trees). --クールネシ^トーク 19:43, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I like it a lot more! Hair 00:50, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Support -Epic Graphics on that new one. :D ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 04:39, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Unlike Benny, I like the water and grass. Not to mention it's a lousy idea to have obsolete graphics on the main page. Hofmic Talk 04:43, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Sure.

REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 10:43, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Support - It's improved. The Last Pun ^Talk 04:28, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Although the trees are not magical any more and mummy and cubby bear are not together, the blue grass and the water still make it look mystical. Fsw e1 07:28, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Evergreens are so much better looking than the old scrawny ugly trees. Brings more of a uniform color to the image. Water is fine (I thought we were done with that issue already). Ryan PM 02:08, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The replacement nomination is successful Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 11:28, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Zemouregal's Fort

[[File:Zemouregal's fort front (replacement).png|thumb|250px|Replacement]]

Reason: That tree to the right is outdated. I'm nitpicky.

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 18:18, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - *facepalm* It's smaller and the tree is barely visible. I'll retake it after this is over with my new huge screen if you want me to... *moar facepalm* Fsw e1 19:05, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comment - Do something better with your time. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 19:07, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comment - A tree that you half see is REALLY a big thing. Just saying. User:Jr Mime/Signature 19:08, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - The lighting gives it a more awe-inspiring look in the original, which it lacks in the new version. As well as there's too much sky, along with the tree being barely noticeable. Coelacanth0794 Talk 19:10, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - The current picture seems to be of better quality to me, tree or no tree. https://i.imgur.com/Om8N4.png^>>>^✯^Talk ^✯^HS^✯[[Special:Chat|<span style="color:black"><sup>Chat</sup></span>]]^✯^<<< 19:13, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - We need to discourage wasting time like this. Per fergs. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 19:40, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comment - It doesn't matter if it's barely visible, it's still obsolete. Wahisietel (Talk) 08:34, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

~~A user has requested closure for Featured images/archive-obsolete.~~ Request complete. The reason given was: Week gone by, consensus clear. Knowing the use of this template, another week will go by.

Fsw e1 07:16, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The image will not be replaced. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 16:03, August 16, 2012 (UTC)

Mogre Camp

[[File:Reef new.png|250x250px|right|New image]]

Reason: Obsolete chararcter. Also the old image seems color-enhanced, as the new image is taken in maximum settings with no color enhancement.

Support - As nominator. Spine^Talk 23:09, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral - I like the fog on the first image since you don't see the big blue background. Also, I do like the colors on the second image, so a combination of those 2 will be awesome. User:Jr Mime/Signature 23:27, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - The colours are just not that vibrant and it's rather foggy, which is very strange underwater. =( Fsw e1 06:00, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
Actually that's exactly what it looks like in real life... Maybe even more foggy. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 05:00, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
Support - The old one doesn't look like underwater at all, where as the new one does, due to it looking foggy. bad_fetus^talk 01:45, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Per nominator. Hair 12:38, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose - The colours are nowhere near as vibrant. Perhaps we should ask Elf if he recoloured it in any way? Wahisietel (Talk) 16:57, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
It's obviously been recolored. Every time I've been down there it's looked like the above picture. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 05:00, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - the image will be replaced. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 14:28, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Al Kharidian Desert

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Italay90 (talk) on 22:16, September 26, 2012 (UTC).

Support 2 - Since the other person before me didn't sign, I support #2 since it has AA, bigger, a lot of details. User:Jr Mime/Signature 01:04, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support 2 - looks alot better in general, updated graphic for the area. http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/7751/thenexil.png 01:26, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support 2 - I like the extra details and nicer lighting on the second. ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 03:21, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support 2- Fsw e1 12:52, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support 2 - much more detailed AnselaJonla 12:58, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - I don't like either of them. 2 has too much of the foggy background, 1 has too much of the sandy foreground. There needs to be something right in between that doesn't have too much extra space but that also doesn't cut off the trees. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 14:23, October 1, 2012 (UTC)

Comment & new image - I cropped it a bit, looks kinda better. User:Jr Mime/Signature 01:15, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The second nominated image will be the new featured image. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 14:38, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

While Guthix Sleeps

[[File:While Guthix Sleeps replacement.png|250px|right|new|thumb]]

Reason: Old image has obsolete player and armour, and is definitely colour enhanced.

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 08:27, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Not that spectacular anyway. There are better images of the Stone. Fsw e1 08:42, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Older image was better looking despite it being out of date. Lighting detail and both hands on the stone is what made to older image interesting. This new one, not so much. Ryan PM 22:56, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, old one only had one hand on the stone too. It was captured with the camera facing the player in a way that made it look like both and then flipped. I agree with you both on delisting it though. Wahisietel (Talk) 09:51, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Support - I think the stone still looks cool, even though it has less contrast. It still shows a very cool part of RuneScape. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 14:00, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Very interesting image, but I feel the previous one is just much better in quality. The lighting gives me that scene of awe feel, and the stone itself looks much more crisp. After the combat beta, dagon'hai will probably be updated as well, so it may be obsolete again. Coelacanth0794 Talk 11:32, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - As Fswe said, there are better images of the Stone, notably the other featured image (I believe it's featured) with Saradomin healing Commander Zilyana with the stone. Haidro ^(talk) 11:41, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Per Fswe. Hair 01:26, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - This image will be delisted. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 11:59, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Al Kharid palace

The current image, the version I am attempting to upload can be seen in the history

[[File:Al Kharid palace replacement.png|thumb|Replacement (2)]] [[File:Al Kharid palace replacement1.png|thumb|Replacement (3)]] Reason: The current image is obsolete, and i've uploaded a new one. The person who I almost got myself in a revert war with seems to think my version should not be included because it is "crappy", but the higher angle is neccesary as the palace is now much taller with a 3 story high arch in front that would get in the way otherwise. I realize that there is background fog, but so is there in the original... Ansela reverted and protected it with the statement "leave FIMGs alone" shortly thereafter. Now, obviously Ansela has the final say so this vote is pointless and may get me banned, but despite it's featured status, it is still obsolete.

Support, as nominator --BieberAxeKiller (talk) 00:48, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - It's obsolete, yes, but I don't like the new version either. I volunteer to retake it (with AA and a better angle and stuff), but I'd rather have the obsolete version featured, since it still looks very good. Fsw e1 12:55, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - I'll go and get a new image in 1 hour. User:Jr Mime/Signature 20:05, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

New replacement nominee ~~& Support 2~~ - ~~As of the new image, I support #2.~~ User:Jr Mime/Signature 21:26, September 27, 2012 (UTC)

New replacement nominee - Slightly smaller, but the central angle gives the palace a more royal, never-ending sense. -- Al ch ez 08:34, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - It's pretty much impossible to do the new version of the palace justice with the current drawdistance. Perhaps after the drawdistance increase someone can use two monitors to get a better screenshot worthy of being featured.. Wahisietel (Talk) 18:13, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, but until then we need an image to replace the gravely obsolete one.. Al ch ez 08:48, October 1, 2012 (UTC)

Notice - Nomination extended by 1 week. If there are no further comments within that period, this nomination will be unsuccessful, and because the image is obsolete, it will be delisted. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 14:37, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Support 3 - I think the third looks good. The sideview has a bit too much fog in the palace I think. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 14:13, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Support 3 - The part of the castle isn't cut off, along with it being centered and more symmetrical. That makes it cleaner to look at, at least for me. Coelacanth0794 Talk 11:29, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Support 3 - Better angle in my opinion, and there isn't as much fog as number 2. Haidro ^(talk) 11:38, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Support 3 - Seems a better angle than the 2nd one. User:Jr Mime/Signature 14:30, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The image will be replaced with image 3. Sentra246 09:20, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Goblin Village

[[File:Goblin village gathering new.png|250px|right|thumb|New]] Reason:Obsolete, goblins updated, but the mob isn't. Also, my screen isn't big enough to get a perfect shot :(. Different angle from the odl one, teh chatbox would be in the way otherwise.

Delist - Because it just looks silly with half updated goblins and half not. Wahisietel (Talk) 14:57, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Hm. While I prefer the original, the whole thing is a bit messy either way. The new version looks awkward, more so that there are a few updated goblins but the majority retain the old look. The change of scenery also really hesitates to sell the image to me. Coelacanth0794 Talk 15:03, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Nothing special; way too crowded. The Last Pun ^Talk 15:36, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Or keep as the old one until the rest of the goblins get updated. I think the image still looks cool, other than the 2 outdated goblins. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 09:26, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Keep old image - Yes, I know it's obsolete, but I've always liked this one a lot and it looks very well on the main page -- I don't see why we shouldn't just keep it. The nominated replacement is messy & squashed. Ronan^Talk 17:09, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral - Per Joey and Flayflay. Fsw e1 14:34, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Way too busy for a small image on the mainpage. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 17:11, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - The new image looks like a party, and not an army. User:Jr Mime/Signature 17:54, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - The image will be delisted. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 19:37, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

Recipe for Disaster

Reason: Outdated Player, Goblin and Gypsy

Delist- Wasn't really a very good image to begin with, the council use the pre-facial features update models, and Lumbridge Sage uses his old model too. Wahisietel (Talk) 14:22, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Could use slightly more downward angle but ah well. Fsw e1 09:25, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - The faces are just all outdated, and looking at the knight, all body models are also still from RS SD. This is just not a good enough image anymore compared to the rest of the FIMGs. When Jagex updates all the models, I'd be happy to have it as FIMG again. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 09:31, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Extended - If this one doesn't get more comments, it will be delisted for being obsolete, and have the file replaced. JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger19:28, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support - The new angle is pretty sweet. ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 05:27, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Outdated faces on NPCs, nah. Good improvement from the last though. Haidro ^(talk) 07:27, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - This image will be delisted Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 17:46, November 12, 2012 (UTC)

Yu'biusk

[[File:Yu'biusk new.png|250px|right|thumb|Replacement nom 1]]

Reason: Outdated goblins.

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 17:01, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Support - Visually correct images are more important. WK of Angmar (talk) 23:28, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I'd like to have Yu'biusk updated with this update too, but it can wait I guess.

REDIRECT User:Cqm/Signature

Delist - There's absolutely nothing going on in the image. It's just some goblins in an inaccessible place; the scenery is quite bland with the red stuff and the firepit glow is now gone. -- Al ch ez 09:49, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
Support - The image still looks as good as it used to, and the goblins do need to be updated. I'm wondering though, is the size of that image the maximum size of the screen during the cutscene? And if not, could you try getting a slightly bigger pic? JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 09:28, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Support 2 - Same image, but updated goblins. I liek JOEYTJE50 TALK pull my finger 20:41, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
~~Weak support~~ - (as in, support replacement, weak support to remain FIMG) It looks good when thumb'd, but the cutscene's nature doesn't make the image show much of the surrounding... Fsw e1 14:33, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

New image - Has the same angle and such as the old one. Sorry for the lateness, extend nomination if ye want. Wahisietel (Talk) 14:21, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support 2 - Fsw e1 14:25, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
Support #2 - Has what I liked about the original. The Last Pun ^Talk 17:03, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Support 2, nomination extended - I like the mushrooms in 2 better. Extended nomination because apparently people are not capable of completing one nomination before starting a new one. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 17:14, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Support 2 - Looks the same, but goblins updated. User:Jr Mime/Signature 17:54, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Delist - Alchez is right. Without the glow from the fire, the image is even more bland than before. Nothing interesting happens. Ronan^Talk 21:38, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Support 2 - I like the new goblins. :D ^Ninja DarkDoomOrb ^Talk 05:24, October 29, 2012 (UTC)

Close - Version 2 will be used to replace the obsolete FIMG. -- Spine^Talk 01:40, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

Assassin Outfit

[[File:Assassin_outfit_equipped new.png|250x250px|right|Current version]]

Description: Lurks in the shadows, waiting for a moment to strike.
Reason: Sheathed position. New idle position makes it look much better.

Support - As nominator. Spine^Talk 01:38, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Looks good, just missing the sword thought. User:Jr Mime/Signature 01:40, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

It's sheathed, and I also asked Ryan to add offhand scimitar override as well. --

Spine^Talk

01:43, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

Support/Comment - If you get this in the combat stance with both swords, you have my full support. But for this new replacement, I support. Haidro ^(talk) 04:41, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

Delist - Dat stance terrible. =/ Fsw e1 16:55, November 22, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Hair 07:29, November 23, 2012 (UTC)

Approve - Per Ezio and Altair. Love the daggers. --Al ch ez 08:09, November 23, 2012 (UTC)

Close - Obsolete image will be replaced. -- Spine^Talk 23:23, November 29, 2012 (UTC)

Swept Away

Support - As nominator. Wahisietel (Talk) 11:03, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support #2 - A slightly overhead angle seems best here. Fsw e1 11:11, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support #1 - I like #1 better. Hair 16:34, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support 1- the witch, whatever her name is, is standing in a very good position which I prefer over 2.Haidro ^(talk) 21:33, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
Support Uno - The lightin', the witch and the goulash. Al ch ez 11:51, December 10, 2012 (UTC)
Support 2 - Has less blank space in the back. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 04:00, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
Support 1 - It looks better, a player's eye view. User:Jr Mime/Signature 00:56, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
Support 1 - I like the player-eye view more than the aerial shot. http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/Blaze_fire.png http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/12.png 02:22, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - Image number one will be used as replacement for the obsolete featured image. Hair 21:11, December 29, 2012 (UTC)