Archive directory | Delisting archive | Replacement archive | Obsolete archive | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
Successful nominations
Mithril dragon
Description: The strongest metalic horror that ended many adventures.
Reason: Nice angle, the most powerful dragon, nice colors, etc.
- Support - As nominator. Felipe B Rs contribs talk 18:50, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support - I'd like the camera or the dragon a tiny bit rotated so that you can see its tail and fourth leg, but still can see his menacing head like this. It could also be straightened so Mr. Dragon doesn't look down. But furthermore, I think this image of the Mithril dragon is very representive for the metal dragons.
Fswe1
06:48, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- To illustrate what I mean, see File:Iron dragon.png. I would definitely support that, and strongly suppport if it was blue like its mithril counterpart.
Fswe1
17:10, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- IMHO, that iron dragon image is terrible.
- Strong support - itz pwnage. bad_fetustalk 15:27, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - The angle's really good and it looks cool.
Shrodder1
16:08, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like that. I like it a lot.
User:Haloolah123/Sig 16:13, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Support - YES! User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 02:18, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I am suddenly reminded of transformers beast wars from when I was little. Coelacanth0794 03:06, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Angles. --Coolnesse 00:06, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - It is a great picture and it certainly should be featured. Bbbbweb 13:06, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like this image alot, even if the angles are a bit... off SplâshTâlkSîgn hêrê 17:31, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Pretty.
- REDIRECT User:C886553/sig 03:22, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Great image, though the wings look a bit awkward.
Zap0i Talk
11:59, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is successful. C.ChiamTalk 06:40, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Dragonfire shield
Description: The head of a brutally slaughtered dragon, hacked violently off its body and melted onto an anti-dragon shield.
Reason: It's...umm...ferocious?
- Support - As nominator. I know the description kind of sucks, feel free to change it. I realized that we had
noone featured image that was an item, so I looked through and this was the best item picture I could find. ʞooɔ 01:59, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- None you say?
Evil1888 Talk A's L
02:08, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Cool. User:Stelercus/Signature 02:00, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Eek! Oh, it's dead... Awesome!
Evil1888 Talk A's L
02:08, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - First of all, the Mask of dragith nurn is a featured item image. Second, this looks way too unsettling for me to support it. It looks quite disturbing. --LiquidTalk 02:08, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Edit conflict x2 It is neat. User:TyA/sig 02:09, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Adamant support - One of the best feathered images ever, its not that disturbing, not like its still alive or something. And hows that description? Too violent sounding?
3rd age farcaster
02:28, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - It gives reader some "Rawr" and gets attention. Rewlf2 02:55, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - --Iiii I I I 02:58, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Though the description is rather violent, this image is great.
Fswe1
06:35, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support - In my opinion, the description makes it better!
- REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 07:42, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Per steler
. I swear I already commented on this nom... 222 talk 09:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Per Liquid Helm. Also, the image looks horrible if in full size.
Zap0i Talk
12:12, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - The first item fimg that im opposing :o. Anyways, too angular. bad_fetustalk 15:51, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Support - Per 3rd Age, Steler, and Rewlf2, plus it definitely will catch peoples' eyes when they first visit the Wiki and make them think "Z0mg0sh! Kewl DFS pic! Me like da Wiki nao!" (please note that this is a bit exaggerated, though people will still marvel over the epicness of a large image of the DFS on the front page of the Wiki
). In any case, I support!
- REDIRECT User:N7 Elite/Signature 18:46, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Meh, this one may be impressive (for once), but I don't know if it's worth being a featured image...User:Haloolah123/Sig 18:48, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - definetely gives the Wow! JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:03, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Players rarely have the opportunity to see a nice, big image of one of the best-looking shields in the game. Tien 02:32, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - It's a good picture but i find items aren't quite interesting enough to be a FI.
Sentra246
09:30, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
- GRAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!
- Sorry, was just trying to do the same he looks like...
JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 14:43, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Its firin' its lazuh
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 15:47, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - As I recall, Jagex mentioned the visage is an ancient dragonkin artefact.
Coelacanth0794 Talk
22:47, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Awesome image. And I have a suggestion for the description: "An ancient and powerful artifact of the dragonkin."
SpineTalk
23:10, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - There is the Mask of dragith nurn, but I liek dis! --Coolnesse 10:37, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Pretty cool, but there is a minor grammar error in the description. Here is the correction: "The head of a brutally slaughtered dragon, hacked violently off its body and melted onto an anti-dragon shield." Krayfish 16:51, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I fixed it to prevent that an admin has to do it afterwards. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:12, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Unsuccessful nominations
Nomad (monster)
Description: Nomad, the scourge of souls, ready to strike his next victim.
Reason: This monster has great detail combined with a great transparency. A very nice image overall.
- Support - As nominator.
The Last Pun Talk
21:27, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Extreamly strong support- all because of the pose + the gear. 00:22, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Amazing pose and the 4x AA makes it look amazing. --
CaistlynTalk Contribs 00:59, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Sort of oppose - You can barely see his face. Also, 3AF, learn how to spell extremely ^_^ ʞooɔ 01:01, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - He looks quite good, but that's the end. The pose is awful. I can see half of his face, and his leg is barely visible. And the staff looks very cool, but all I see is a small, grey stick. I think I would support if the angle was turned about 90 degrees to the left.
Fswe1
06:39, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - The previous version of the image was way better. bad_fetustalk 15:04, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Great image. --Coolnesse 18:41, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral-The pose is good, but the angle is wrong.
- Neutral - Great picture and very interesting just you can't see all of him.
Sentra246
02:20, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Per all arguments above.
Rhys Talk
03:02, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Slight oppose - Bleh view.
Lil cloud 9 Talk 07:34, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Per Fswe.
Zap0i Talk
15:17, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Look at his eye(s), its white.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 11:43, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't understand what you're trying to say by that... should they be black?
The Last Pun Talk
14:16, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- White eyes without a black spot = blind or dead.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 15:31, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- White eyes without a black spot = blind or dead.
- Comment - I don't understand what you're trying to say by that... should they be black?
- Oppose - I just don't like the stance. User:Haloolah123/Sig 14:16, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - If the stance wasn't there then he would look better.
Shrodder1
16:05, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per fswe. Coelacanth0794 03:05, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Notice of intent - Deadline of nomination extended by a week to 17 July 2010. C.ChiamTalk 03:23, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Extreamly Strong Oppose - It's just an awful picture, prefered the old BETTER version.Bbbbweb 13:14, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like it, nice stance, all around good looking.
- REDIRECT User:C886553/sig 03:23, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Death Altar
Description: A player enveloped with the energies of death and destruction.
Reason: Nice colours, good frontal line up, bones and blood add too it and its very dramatic (if that makes sense).
- Support - As nominator. [Pharos] 15:01, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - The angle's really good and the skulls are quite cool.
Shrodder1
16:10, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Boring, and I don't really like images that have players in them anyways. bad_fetustalk 16:47, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Great symmetry, I love the player and Thorgel. However, despite the Skulls of Vegeance looking very cool, from this angle they look very dumb with their big, farmer's teeth.
And someone who doesn't know it's a cutscene would wonder what those stripes are. There are pros and cons, so I'm neutral.
Fswe1
16:52, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- What stripes are you talking about? O_o (and I had no idea that it was a cutscene >_>)bad_fetustalk 16:53, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Is the dwarf leaking his reddish-fluid?
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 04:01, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- lol yeah i was thinking about that too...- [Pharos] 09:04, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Fswe1's right, the white lines are distracting, but that's really it's only flaw.
Evil1888 Talk A's L
04:13, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Great picture, not much wrong with it.
Sentra246
04:29, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support - Nice, but I don't notice any crafting going on... --Coolnesse 00:05, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- What do you mean by that? If you mean that the person isn't making runes, that's because this is a cutscene (I think). ʞooɔ 00:06, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh... well. --Coolnesse 00:08, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not next to the one above (Mithril Dragon) SplâshTâlkSîgn hêrê 17:46, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Boring 222 talk 07:04, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Disturbing, and the image looks horrible when it's small.
Zap0i Talk
11:57, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Notice of intent - Deadline of nomination extended by a week to 22 July 2010. C.ChiamTalk 08:51, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - why is the players wearing used underwear? 17:07, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Uhh, yeah...what are you talking about? ʞooɔ 20:10, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- The player on the alter is covered in used underwear. And im wondering why. 02:12, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- What makes you think that he is covered in used underwear? bad_fetustalk 09:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- just look at him. hes covered in brown, form fitting, and VERY, VERY UGLY gear. 13:29, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Plague trousers and Plague jacket. >.> At least do the quests Coelacanth0794 16:41, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- That's just Mourner Clothing. And how would a gas mask be used underwear?
Fswe1
17:13, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- ceola, i have a quest cape and i know what it is. just because it has a name doesnt mean its not dirty underwear. morner clothing IS underwear. but the gask mask isnt. 20:12, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm changing my question. What makes you think that mourner outfit is dirty underwear? bad_fetustalk 12:52, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Because it looks like it is. 15:04, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- ...*Doesn't understand why* Coelacanth0794 15:06, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Another question... how does dirty underwear look for you? IMO, it's a small stain of you-know-what and not a semi-stylish outfit that is covered with the same colour. I mean, what underwear has sleeves, for example.
Fswe1
18:14, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- you cut the "small stains of you know what out" out of the underwears and tape em together and u get this. 18:35, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- o, you're really saying they're a medley of cut out underwear stains sewn together? Coelacanth0794 18:37, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- yes. 19:11, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Even those evil Elves wouldn't do that. Hopefully. -__-
Fswe1
19:25, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- I hereby award the Person Who Is Most Successful at Causing a Conversation to Go Off-Topic Prize to 3rd age farcaster! Also, I Support - This image has a great, powerful, and yet dark look that I really love. The dirty underwear outfit only adds value to the image. Asfastasdark 21:33, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Even those evil Elves wouldn't do that. Hopefully. -__-
- yes. 19:11, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- o, you're really saying they're a medley of cut out underwear stains sewn together? Coelacanth0794 18:37, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- you cut the "small stains of you know what out" out of the underwears and tape em together and u get this. 18:35, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Another question... how does dirty underwear look for you? IMO, it's a small stain of you-know-what and not a semi-stylish outfit that is covered with the same colour. I mean, what underwear has sleeves, for example.
- ...*Doesn't understand why* Coelacanth0794 15:06, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Because it looks like it is. 15:04, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm changing my question. What makes you think that mourner outfit is dirty underwear? bad_fetustalk 12:52, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- ceola, i have a quest cape and i know what it is. just because it has a name doesnt mean its not dirty underwear. morner clothing IS underwear. but the gask mask isnt. 20:12, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- That's just Mourner Clothing. And how would a gas mask be used underwear?
- Plague trousers and Plague jacket. >.> At least do the quests Coelacanth0794 16:41, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- just look at him. hes covered in brown, form fitting, and VERY, VERY UGLY gear. 13:29, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- What makes you think that he is covered in used underwear? bad_fetustalk 09:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- The player on the alter is covered in used underwear. And im wondering why. 02:12, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Weak Support - Maybe we have to wait a graphics update in dwarfs. Felipe B Rs contribs talk 13:25, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - It's to busy and there's to much in the picture, making it busy and not very nice to look at, not focused on a single thing. Dwarves need to be updated in this image for it to be a good image also.TzTok-Gas talk 14:38, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - As per TzTok-Gas. --Condor85 18:41, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Per 3rd age Farcaster.
SpineTalk
19:05, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Boring, the vengance skulls make it look horrible at that angle, and worst of all, the player makes it look geeky.B4nana man 05:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 11:29, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Blightleaf (plant)
Description: A blightleaf plant, a source of attire for many dungeoneerers.
Reason: Transparency was done well, there is great detain, and a multitude of colours.
- Support - As nominator. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 01:35, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - An ugly plant with some ugly tones of purple and green. bad_fetustalk 09:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per chess, it is just a plant, and not a very pretty one at that.
Sentra246
12:26, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nice image, but horrible transparency. Just a plant too :/ Felipe B Rs contribs talk 16:28, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's small, and has dull colors, and it simply lacks the "wow" factor that you'd typically expect from a Featured image. 16:36, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - The plant looks great, but the angle is awkward. Lacks AA.
Fswe1
17:14, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Asfastasdark.
Zap0i Talk
22:14, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Asfastasdark.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 04:06, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per all above. User:Haloolah123/Sig 21:05, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per ALL above.
SpineTalk
19:08, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Chess. Riblet15 06:16, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 11:30, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Brutal Green Dragon
Description: An extremely aggressive dragon that has been in the Ancient Caverns a little too long.
Reason: It has great lighting and transparency. The angle also gets a nine. And the beast itself looks very cool.
- Support - As nominator.
Fswe1
19:34, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Great angle, the beastie looks nice as well. But I'm getting tired of all these dragon images. ʞooɔ 19:40, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Nice image, but already have a featured image of a dragon... Felipe B Rs contribs talk 20:48, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'm sorry...he looks like dead though...it just looks weird. He's like a zombie dragon. Not real impressive in my mind. User:Haloolah123/Sig 20:59, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - @Felipe & Cook Me: There's was only one (succeful) nomination of a dragon. Look how many nominations we had for Zanaris, and at least two passed. Well, one dragon shouldn't be too much then.
Fswe1
17:08, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The angle and the holes on the wings of the dragon are disturbing. bad_fetustalk 09:19, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Angle makes it look like it has 3 legs. I also don't think we need another dragon. - [Pharos] 09:40, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- You can see the fourth leg. (wings are torn, Chessy)
Fswe1
18:24, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- So? Wings being torn doesn't make it less disturbing bad_fetustalk 08:52, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- But the holes make the dragon disturbing for a reason which is that it hasn't been above ground in thousands of years and is still very feral when compared to it's kin, and you would be hard pressed to find a brutal green dragon wihtout the holes. Fury 133 Talk
22:34, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Again, so what if they are thousands of years old etc. etc.? It looks disturbing. bad_fetustalk 09:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- They are stuck in a cave from which they cannot escape, which usually fufills the quote for evil scary monster. Just think that if many feral creatures are stuck together only the strongest, toughest and scarest will survive (basic evolution and psycology) which means that this best embodies the Butal Green Dragon and because it does this so well it deserves to be a FIMG Fury 133 Talk
09:08, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand what a FIMG is. FIMG's are images that look good, and this certainly doesn't with all those holes. The plot is completely irrelevant. bad_fetustalk 09:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- The holes are there and they give the Dragon its character, yes the plot is to be put to the side but if you really hate the hole so much why don't you take a better image of a brutal green dragon without them. Fury 133 Talk
09:15, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Brutal green dragons have that. I can not take holeless images of them. That's why I will oppose every single nominations of them unless they recieve another graphical update. bad_fetustalk 09:19, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- The holes are there and they give the Dragon its character, yes the plot is to be put to the side but if you really hate the hole so much why don't you take a better image of a brutal green dragon without them. Fury 133 Talk
- I don't think you understand what a FIMG is. FIMG's are images that look good, and this certainly doesn't with all those holes. The plot is completely irrelevant. bad_fetustalk 09:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- They are stuck in a cave from which they cannot escape, which usually fufills the quote for evil scary monster. Just think that if many feral creatures are stuck together only the strongest, toughest and scarest will survive (basic evolution and psycology) which means that this best embodies the Butal Green Dragon and because it does this so well it deserves to be a FIMG Fury 133 Talk
- Again, so what if they are thousands of years old etc. etc.? It looks disturbing. bad_fetustalk 09:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- But the holes make the dragon disturbing for a reason which is that it hasn't been above ground in thousands of years and is still very feral when compared to it's kin, and you would be hard pressed to find a brutal green dragon wihtout the holes. Fury 133 Talk
- So? Wings being torn doesn't make it less disturbing bad_fetustalk 08:52, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Slight Oppose - Per Halo.
Zap0i Talk
22:19, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - its pretty much a duplicate of an already nominated image, File:Foundationdragon.png, and I think that one looks nicer http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
22:23, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- support - yes it is a duplicate, but that is red and this is green and green > red. 17:45, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I looks great and really is perfect for FIMG as well as it looking way better then the current FIMG of the red tutorial dragon. Fury 133 Talk
22:34, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per ʇoqoɹ oɥɔʎsd.
Sentra246
09:13, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 18:20, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Arrav
Description: Legend of Avarrocka, Curse of Goblins and unfortunate minion of Zemouregal.
Reason: The angle is just fantastic and his overall looks are very cool.
- Support - As nominator (I'm not Sharathteerk...).
Fswe1
14:45, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Dull colors, and a weird sword-like thingy. bad_fetustalk 15:07, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I forgot to mention the human-like weird arrav guy thats grey for some reason. bad_fetustalk 15:08, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm guessing the fact that he's undead has something to do with that...
The Last Pun Talk
15:25, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Or maybe he bleached himself.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 15:28, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Or maybe he bleached himself.
- I'm guessing the fact that he's undead has something to do with that...
- Neutral- i like the head and the body, and the belt. the sword is too far though, and idk, its just kinda simple.
3rd age farcaster
15:46, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nice image, but does not seem to move, like a simple statue od rock... Felipe B Rs contribs talk 18:17, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - If this is featured image quality, then so is a thousand other images taken with the OoO. We have to be more selective. http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
18:36, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Nice image, and i like that it has more 3d because of his sword, but it is a bit too much pale colors and there are quite a lot of images like these that have more spectacular colors. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 22:37, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Someone took off his horns and rearranged them badly.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 02:04, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per above, this isn't spectacular in any way. User:Haloolah123/Sig 04:21, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nothing special, pretty ordinary monster. Comparable to the Black Knight Titan. 222 talk 09:02, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - A bit dull with the colours.
Sentra246
09:09, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - monochromatic (if that's even a word)
Lil cloud 9 Talk 11:28, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per all.
Zap0i Talk
16:30, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 07:56, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Ghost
Description: Needs description, feel free to suggest one.
Reason: Looks kewl, and has awesome transparency.
- Support - As nominator. bad_fetustalk 09:05, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Even though it has the best transparency that I have ever seen in my life, I must say that the actual picture is too polygonal. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 14:12, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Neuteral - Update plox, jagex? Coelacanth0794 18:15, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support - The image looks awesome, great angle. Felipe has done his best at the transparency and it looks better now. Despite that, it´s not too realistic. (sorry, can´t do signature on this Spanish computer)
Fswe1
About 21:00, July 24, 2010
- Strong oppose - Transparency is applied into the image, I don't like that. --Coolnesse 23:55, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Just not all that good. User:Haloolah123/Sig 23:57, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Wut is that thing on the hand thats black?
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 17:48, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Gloves, I think. --Coolnesse 19:14, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - It would be unique, but it doesn't really have the "Wow" factor.
Zap0i Talk
21:13, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Slight Oppose - As Zap said it's unique. I also think it's interesting, but I don't think it rings as a featured image. If it was less angle by angle I wouyld probably support :).
CamianaTalk
21:18, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
- VERY Strong Support - Very unique, fun to come to f images page and not get barraged with scenery, dung stuff, or dragons, really good angle, transperancy, and I myself find it very realistic- looks like it has a mouth as well as well-shaped arms, not like most NPCs. 23:54, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Personally, I'd support it just because it's asymmetrical and that quality is something I'd like to see more often in the featured images. I also agree with 3AF's points. Leftiness 06:22, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It looks fake, like in editing it, he made it so it could barely be called a screenshot anymore, more like fan art. http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
06:27, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Great transparency and very interesting and detailed picture
- Weak Oppose - It's not all that fantastic... are those biker gloves?!?
Evil1888 Talk A's L
06:32, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Minor Support - It looks rather cool, but it really does have some problems. Even so, I really like how it looks.
Amascut Ia Morte 23:05, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - One word, ugly. And also, per the others. 222 talk 06:51, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per all
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 09:23, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - It has great transparency but it is too square and shaped up.
Shrodder1
17:27, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - Nice image, but this is not really monster's texture, but made in photoshop. Is impossible to take it in a semi-transparent monster. Felipe B Rs contribs talk 20:57, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Not photoshop...? --Coolnesse 21:13, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Notice of intent - Deadline extended until August 6, 2010. --LiquidTalk 01:29, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Amazing transparency and it is Not fan art or made in photoshop, if you look at the previous versions it is the same picture just all the brown has been removed.
Sentra246
09:15, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - per all
Lil cloud 9 Talk 11:23, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 07:57, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Glassblowing book
Description: A big red book with a spoon on the cover.
Reason: Cuz.
- Di[[pty - Sd mp,omsypt --Iiii I I I 16:36, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- translation: support: as nom. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 17:51, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- translation: support: as nom. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
- Di[[pty - Brtu johj fryso; pm yjr vpbrt. smf yjr d[ppm od s movr sffrf fryso;, dp oy fprd mpy ;ppl n;snf http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 17:51, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Translation: support: high quality, spoon makes it look unbland, blah blah blah http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 17:51, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Translation: support: high quality, spoon makes it look unbland, blah blah blah http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
- p[[pdr - zo kidy fpmy ;olr oy. o yjoml oyd lomfs [ ;som smf oy fpmrdy trs;;u [p[ sd pyjrt grsyitrf o,shrd fp/ http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
18:31, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Nwsuyn ayooier - Few\r swr\uk vyr ok\ub, &kik \r wcwetibw~(
Fswe1
19:19, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- AAARGH! X_X - *Brain explodes attempting to decipher shorthand* Coelacanth0794 19:21, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- P[[pdr - [rt [duvjp. User:Haloolah123/Sig 19:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's a giant...book. (And not everybody's keyboard is the same, and I started getting a headache, so I stopped trying. >_>)
Lil cloud 9 Talk 19:28, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Yeah, a book, but The Chosen Book! Looks fantastic. Felipe B Rs contribs talk 19:33, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Comentário - Need something to translate? Try it: Mas que porcaria é essa que vocês falaram? Eu li, virei minha cabeça e fiz de tudo e até agora não descobri o que significa nem como descobrir isto, se é que é posssível. Talvez sejam só letras aleatórias... Ah! O tradutor do Google não vai funcionar muito bem ao traduzir isso, já que ele é uma porcaria (todos são) nesta função. Cabe à vocês descobrirem (ou não) do que se trata estre comentário gigante. Aliás, minhas imagens humilham :D . Felipe B Rs contribs talk 19:44, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Could you all translate the shorthand to regular English? If I end up closing this, I will not spend time translating all these votes. Thanks. C.ChiamTalk 06:57, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Translate that crap at the top. I'm not making an opinion until I know what I'm talking about. 222 talk 07:20, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes i can't understand any of it.
Sentra246
10:18, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- It's 1 key to the right of the original letter, so hello will be jr;;p. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 18:10, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Rofl@the description. bad_fetustalk 10:30, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Di[[pty - Kidy vsidr.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 16:46, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - looks like a baloon.
3rd age farcaster
01:06, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- How to speak balloonspoon by Red Hardcover Book writer guy. Coelacanth0794 01:11, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - You CAN judge a book by its cover. Seems like an interesting read =)
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 12:41, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
EXTREMELY |
---|
EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY (spam) EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY EXTREMELY |
STRONG OPPPOSE(RCYTR<R:U DYTPMH P{{PDR) - There is nothing special about a book with a glassblowing pipe and glass being blowed on it? The description is not even correct. There are much better images that aren't FIMG either, so those images should be featured first, and then this one might also be. This image doesn't have the WOW effect of FIMGs, and doesn't have any of the other things FIMGs have. BTW, there are VERY much images on the wiki like this one. then all of those images should be featured, if this one does also. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 18:10, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Lol chillax dude, everyone has a right to their own opinion so you cannot say that there are "VERY much images on the wiki like this one. then all of those images should be featured" If someone saw a reason for nominating this, let them =)
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 14:17, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, despite the 'shortish' reason.
Fswe1
15:18, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- ok, i agree that it is ok to nominate them, but the fact that images like these are supported(di[[ptyrf) that much, is a bit strange, so i wanted to tell what i think about it, and that's that images like there are very much of on the wiki shouldn't be featured, as there are much better images than images like this one. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 17:51, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, despite the 'shortish' reason.
- p[[pdr (Oppose) ,,,. z ;pbr vjovlrm fti,dyovld/// (Translation: Mmm, I love chicken drumsticks...).
Zap0i Talk
20:53, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Dytonh p[[pdr: Yjod od s nppl/// oy od mpyjomh d[rvos;/ Yjr gsvy yjsy yjr wis;oyu od mpy htrsy ,slrd ,r rcytr,r;u imomv;omrf yp di[[pty oy. --LiquidTalk 15:13, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Translation: Strong oppose: This is a book... It is nothing special. The fact that the quality is not great makes me extremely unlikely to support it. --LiquidTalk 15:13, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
Rune Essence mine (2)
Description: The place all Rune essence comes from.
Reason: Good angle, good quality and a bit mystical.
Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive10#Rune_Essence_mine with this file
- Support - As nominator. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 00:07, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Nice and mystical. ʞooɔ 04:07, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I think the previous version was better; this one's transparent background doesn't help, in my opinion. I'd support the version with a background at an angle a bit lower and to the left - maybe cropped to remove the portal. Leftiness 04:10, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Weak(per talk pages) Support - Despite not needing transparency, it looks quite good, well done! Tip for the next time: include the cute little stars above it. ♥Fswe1
07:38, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - It's a nice image. It just has something about it. User:TyA/sig 07:45, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I uploaded another file, with the stars at the top(as Fswe1 requested) and it is a bit bigger. The stars are only visible when clicking to enlarge. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 14:02, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comment - I made the subpage RuneScape:Featured_images/File:Rune_Essence_Mine.png/Poll for the question what version of the image you like the most.JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 14:02, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- We kinda have a policy of not being a democracy, so those votes mean next to nothing.
Evil1888 Talk A's L
22:47, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Very cool, though the stars are missing. Even so, it looks nice!
Amascut Ia Morte 16:57, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- There are stars, which you will see when you click on the image. They are however hard to see, and there are only 2 stars per frame in runescape. That way, there will never be more stars. I don't think another shot will capture much more of the stars. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 11:54, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
NeutralOppose - It just isn't all that amazing. User:Haloolah123/Sig 17:05, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support - Guys, you have, like, no imagination anymore. This is spectacular. --Coolnesse 14:34, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- I wasn't going to say this, but to me-It honestly looks like a gigantic upside-down stone turd. That's creepy. User:Haloolah123/Sig 16:00, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
That's what people like you see in this image, but other people see the rune essence mine. Joeytje50 12:43, July 30, 2010 (UTC)- Most people don't see such things, but just see the rune essence mine. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 22:34, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Per Cool.
Zap0i Talk
14:52, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Per nominator.
SpineTalk
15:49, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Per all. User:Stelercus/Signature 17:36, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Halo. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shrodder1 (talk) on 15:38, July 30, 2010 (UTC).
- Support - How can there be doubt about this? this is really one of the best images in the wiki. It really has something mystical in it. Judytje 12:17, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Looks good and interesting.
Sentra246
09:05, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I was gonna say the angle either made it looks like 1. Cool whip or 2. a pile of dung
Lil cloud 9 Talk 11:26, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - You are the second who mentions the "dung", so i wanted to say something about that. If you look neutral to the image, and know it is the rune essence mine, and don't think about the dung, you really won't see it. I do see it when i think that it looks like dung, but if i don't think about it, i don't see dung, but the essence mine. (btw, you can also, as it is more white than brown, see whipped cream or a rune essence mine or something) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 22:50, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't need to "look neutral" to know what the picture is suppose to be of. If I'm the second person to think it looks like dung, then that should say something about the way the angle is making it look like dung. And finally, you shouldn't take it personally if an image doesn't pass (which most don't)- we only want the best pictures to be selected as featured and featured images shouldn't be any less than the best.
Lil cloud 9 Talk 01:35, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't take it personally. I just want the image to be FIMG because i like it very much. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:07, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't need to "look neutral" to know what the picture is suppose to be of. If I'm the second person to think it looks like dung, then that should say something about the way the angle is making it look like dung. And finally, you shouldn't take it personally if an image doesn't pass (which most don't)- we only want the best pictures to be selected as featured and featured images shouldn't be any less than the best.
- Strong Oppose - The angle is very awkward. It's like you're floating above and to the right of it with your head tilted to the right. There are random pixels at the bottom that look very messy. Riblet15 19:07, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - There aren't random pixels at the bottom. They're rocks, which also are part of the rune essence mine. Btw, you could say they are messy, but they are, just like all lines in the image, round, which creates order in the image. I would agree with you if the rocks were in a straight line, but they're not. (learned that of the lines in a drawing lesson) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 22:50, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I've never taken a drawing lesson, but I am an image editor. I didn't mean the rocks - there are random pixels between them. They're only visible in full size, but any image we feature should look good in an article and in its full size. Riblet15 00:16, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:07, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I've never taken a drawing lesson, but I am an image editor. I didn't mean the rocks - there are random pixels between them. They're only visible in full size, but any image we feature should look good in an article and in its full size. Riblet15 00:16, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - I don't like the angle, and this lost the background that would make it look a bit nicer. Without the background, the scaffolding looks out of place. --LiquidTalk 23:05, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - per Riblet, however I think an image of the mine should be a FI. Once this is over, I shall nominate (for replacement) an image with a slightly better angle and AA transparency.
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 12:52, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Please upload that on imageshack and give us the link. Then we can check which image is better: yours or mine. And we could also nominate one version with background(got one already), and your version, for replacement. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:07, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I know how it works, Joey. I'm just waiting till the nomination ends.
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 09:36, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- I mean, can you give us the link now JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 21:07, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Notice of intent - Deadline of nomination extended by a week to 11 August 2010. C.ChiamTalk 12:01, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Saying nothing does not help supporting/opposing this image. As featured images are chosen because of reasons and not the amount of supporters, please say more about your reason to convince the admins. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 03:18, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
*Comment - In short, these reasons were given(please add to the list if you find more reasons given i missed):
|
|
*, **, ^, ° and ~ :different words for about the same
- Overall, there are more support than oppose reasons, but the oppose comments are relatively more different reasons(support is things like cool and good) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 03:18, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, since we are not a democracy, it's the points that matter not the amount, so get some comments in better detail than "good" and that should show that it's... err.. good.
Evil1888 Talk A's L
03:29, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
But still, please comment to help this image become a FIMG or stay a non-FIMG, as saying nothing does not help. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger
- You don't need to add a summary of the reasons...people can read. If anything, all you have shown that the reasons to support it is that it looks "cool". and cool whip is not a support.
Lil cloud 9 Talk 01:15, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Riblet. This isn't a matter of imagination, it's just an unappealing image.
Texan H B K
13:16, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 03:26, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
Varrock West Bank (2)
Description: Varrock West Bank, where valuables are kept safe.
Reason: Interesting bidrs-eye view, HD, bank is empty, etc.
Previous nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive12#Varrock West Bank
- Support - As nominator. Joel amos Talk Contribs 01:44, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The chandelier in the center of the image is very distracting, and not particulaly beautiful, in addition to floating with no apparent support. The image itself is also fairly mundane, and is something that everyone in Runescape has to have seen. It also just lacks a "Wow factor" in general. Pork-n-Duck 08:01, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's not particularly interesting. 222 talk 08:35, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Support - Awesome angle. bad_fetustalk 10:25, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
SupportComment -(As nominator)Per Pork-n-Duck, the middle chandelier is in fact supported. After the chain, there are two brown "wooden" links or something like that. I'll glady chop the top off if that's what it takes to make this image better. Joel amos Talk Contribs 13:03, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - This is definitely not worthy of a FIMG with floating 'pans' in a bank...
Lil cloud 9 Talk 00:12, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Pork.
Fswe1
07:25, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The bank is deserted, and you expect valubles are kept safe.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 16:14, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nothing spectacular about this. User:Haloolah123/Sig 16:34, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per all.
Zap0i Talk
20:48, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - This is one of the images of which i think they don't have to got the wow factor. The place itself is just beautiful. If this image is taken again with 4xAA and making it bigger, i would support. btw, that open door in the far back corner of the bank, while the bank is empty isn't looking very nice either. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 12:36, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - There is nothing special about this image. It doesn't hit me with the wow sense. --LiquidTalk 15:15, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Because the light fixtures are hanging from... er... ya, that's why.
- REDIRECT User:C886553/sig 03:24, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Pork. Nice angle, but doesn't deliver.
Texan H B K
13:11, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 08:24, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
Scabaras
Description: The three statues representing the god and his minions.
Reason: Great detail/angle. The High Priest is also looking good there.
- Support - As nominator. --Coolnesse 16:55, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Too small, one color exept for the high priest, fog. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 19:52, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Where's the fog? --Coolnesse 23:55, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- That's actually the problem. No fog, just a black hole suddenly, without transition to it. Sorry i didn't explain it that well. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 04:36, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Where's the fog? --Coolnesse 23:55, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - He's right...the black space is...unappealing. User:Haloolah123/Sig 04:54, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - The priest and statues look really cool, but it's basically all the same colour, a bit empty in the front and not particularly big.
Fswe1
06:15, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - A man and 3 statues, not very interesting.
Sentra246
10:56, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - No colors, too small, and everything there consists of very disgusting insects. bad_fetustalk 11:00, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - A bug + 3 statues :p
Lil cloud 9 Talk 07:27, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Super Strong Support - It's so... *stunned* Twig Talk https://i.imgur.com/772kZGs.png 07:29, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Stong oppose - Per all. 222 talk 09:04, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- I really like the idea of this image, but it's too small and has enough problems that I can't support. I'd like to see someone take another crack at this one. ʞooɔ 04:15, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Small. The unknown space ruins it. The standing bug staring at the camera is unnatural. User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 07:09, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Eww. --LiquidTalk 15:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 15:12, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
General Graardor
Description: Bandos' most favoured Ourg.
Reason: Big, AA, fantastic angle, great detail. (e.g. on the face)
- Support - As
last remaining Fayrg hidden under Bert's house in Yanillenominator.Fswe1
06:56, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Uhh oppose? - He is squinting... I dont like that... Looks weird... Twig Talk https://i.imgur.com/772kZGs.png 07:03, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - He's not detailed at all. >_> bad_fetustalk 07:37, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- He can't be more detailed than it is now JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 13:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Mr. General has a really "stale" look
Lil cloud 9 Talk 07:43, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - His chest looks weird
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 12:59, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Chess. User:Haloolah123/Sig 15:32, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - per Lil cloud
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 18:13, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose - Monster pictures are good, but they should have background. -Sigmaslash5 19:32, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- All NPCs, monsters etc. have and should have transparent backgrounds so that one only sees the subject and not a rock behind it.
Fswe1
18:37, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - He is quite impressive, and does have the wow effect. Also, my image
JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 01:37, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It looks like a front-view mugshot. 222 talk 08:59, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Not great but nothing really wrong with it either.
Sentra246
10:31, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Uber Oppose - Looks like my grandma.
- REDIRECT User:Swizzl3d/Sig 19:27, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Then you might tell your grandma to visit a docter some time... http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/7023/lollol.gif JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 13:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh boy, ill have to tell her sorry because i killed her yesterday, and why did she drop a rune pickaxe and monster sized bones? =/
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 15:19, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh boy, ill have to tell her sorry because i killed her yesterday, and why did she drop a rune pickaxe and monster sized bones? =/
- Oppose - Graardor: "Cheeeeeeseee
!!" Uploader: *presses the print screen button* My point: Looks to unnatural, in my opinion... I'd like to see him in some action, such beasts like himself do not take pictures for the RuneScape Wiki! he's too busy crushing n00bs in GWD User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 07:07, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- If i would take a shot of him while fighting http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/7620/hammer.gif , that wouldn't show him only, and hitsplats and background should always be removed, etc, so him in fight is not allowed for monster images. Maybe another file should be made for that([[:File:Godwarsdungeonbandoskill.PNG|Feel free to do that]] I thought monster images should always be as idle as possible? JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 13:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- You're correct. An image of Graardor fighting wouldn't be ideal due to hitsplats and whatnot, but I simply don't like this image because it looks like he's at a photo shoot ready to take his picture like a little school child. This does not show off Graardor's agressive, brute lifestyle, and so IMO, it's just not fit to be a FIMG. I didn't say it looked like he was smiling
I just don't like how unnatural it looks. Huge ourgs shouldn't be staring at cameras ready to take their picture.
- On the other hand, this is a top-quality image with great detail, transparency, and anti-aliasing. User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 18:06, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Should i try to take another slight side shot(like K'ril and AOD), as that will make him look less like smilin' into the camera? JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 07:50, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- You're correct. An image of Graardor fighting wouldn't be ideal due to hitsplats and whatnot, but I simply don't like this image because it looks like he's at a photo shoot ready to take his picture like a little school child. This does not show off Graardor's agressive, brute lifestyle, and so IMO, it's just not fit to be a FIMG. I didn't say it looked like he was smiling
- Oppose - The detail is horrible, and he looks odd. --LiquidTalk 01:41, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 01:41, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Shadow-forger Ihlakhizan
Description: Among the last of the Stalkers, it guards the deeper lairs of Daemonheim.
Reason: When I saw this image, I thought "wow". Great transparency, great angle, great lighting, great everything, except for the top of the image.
- Support - As nominator. Mark (talk) 13:10, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Now i know where i left my ragged clothes. I left them drying in Daemonheim. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:04, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Theres a hole in the middle thats black and the edges of the floor are white. Typical.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 16:10, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Too dark...I can't see much of whats in the image.
SpineTalk
16:16, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I was actually thinking about getting a better image to replace this one the other day.
Lil cloud 9 Talk 01:45, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's really dark and i'm not really sure what it is meant to look like.
Sentra246
01:48, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per above. User:Haloolah123/Sig 04:28, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I disagree with all your supportive reasons, sorry.
Fswe1
11:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I lol'd. "Great lighting"? bad_fetustalk 13:09, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- IMO the lightning fits perfectly with the monster. I do have a very high brightness on my PC though. Mark (talk) 21:07, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - While this is an amazing creature, I don't think we'll ever be able to create a FIMG of him due to his massive size. It's hard to get a good picture of him from any angle. User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 07:11, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like it. A bit darkish, but not too dark. I don't really see the problem.
Oil4 Talk 10:42, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- The problems is that my clothes are hanging there, and i don't have any other around here.
PS: If you click to enlarge it looks like he's really smiling to the camera(he is looking a bit evil though). And then Driz said that Graardor was "smiling" to the camera in that nom...[4] JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 14:02, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think that was what (s)he meant. bad_fetustalk 08:47, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, then serious,(that bout laugh was also serious prev. post)
- It's too dark
- It has a creepy laugh
- It's too chaotic
- That's the problem. See it now? JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:12, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, then serious,(that bout laugh was also serious prev. post)
- I don't think that was what (s)he meant. bad_fetustalk 08:47, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The image is cut off, dark and it will scare readers away ^^.
Zap0i Talk
02:07, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per all. It will look like a black hole in the middle of our page.
222 talk 07:18, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 05:18, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Falador
Description: A tranquil and peaceful place to live.
Reason: Like the tranquility and peacefulness
- Support - As nominator.
- REDIRECT User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 14:18, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I can see the edge of the world! I wanna try an step on it! :D
Rhys Talk
14:44, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - This image really has some potential, but it is taken from too high. Maybe a lower shot, with less fog, would improve it. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:07, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - It's not great when you can see the white area behind it.
Sentra246
01:50, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Warthog. User:Haloolah123/Sig 04:27, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- What is the problem with adding a bullet point to your comment, and why do you mention it in almost every FIMG section? I don't understand what relevance that has to FIMGs. User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 07:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't like them or see them necessary to the discussion. As much as I would like them entirely removed, I let other people determine their own comments, and I would like the same respect. User:Haloolah123/Sig 13:20, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Blech. --Coolnesse 07:58, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Plain and foggy.
Fswe1
11:35, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Looks great when you see it in full size, but its terrible otherwise. bad_fetustalk 13:10, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - A bit plain, it has potential, but it doesn't amaze me at all. Looks like a boring little town with the edge of the world in it's northern parts. <_< User:Lil diriz 77/Signatures 07:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Per Chess and Lil's reasons combined.
Zap0i Talk
02:20, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Fswe. 222 talk 07:21, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 05:19, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Rune gold-trimmed armour set (lg)
Description: The strong warrior, illuminating a golden shine.
Reason: Excellent transparency, great detail, looks epic, etc.
- Support - As nominator. --Coolnesse 23:58, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'm sorry, but in the "modern age", rune armor looks noobish, regardless of how much gold you put on it. --LiquidTalk 00:00, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I think its a very nice image that will appeal to a lot of people. But that description has to go. I recommend "Killing in style". http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
00:02, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sorry, lacks the "WOW" factor on most featured images...
SpineTalk
00:04, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not visually appealing or striking enough to be featured. Suppa chuppa Talk 00:09, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Uh, what? Oh, it's a set of gold-trimmed rune armour. Wow. 222 talk 05:52, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Was about to nom This image but i'll wait till this one's over. That one is much better and this one doesn't have the wow JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 08:56, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Wow it's a person wearing rune (g), wait how is this good?
Sentra246
09:12, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per above.
- REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 09:13, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - While it does look nicer up close, it doesn't stand out. And the hand holding the scimitar looks severed. ʞooɔ 09:30, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - I see dozens every day.
Zap0i Talk
20:27, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It doesn't look so epic anymore because we have Barrows, Dragon, 3rd Age, etc. Unfortunately, a rune dagger technically equals a bronze one. Also, the transparency is sloppy with artefacts. This image doesn't like me at all. How about File:Dragon equipment (or) equipped.png?
Fswe1
05:17, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Read my comment. I was saying that too.
also i think the combination black-gold is better than rune-gold, so if a new, better pic is made for full black (g) that one is also better. This one is really the worst color combination of all gold trimmed armors if you ask me. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 21:15, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The armour is not "widely-shock" by the web viewers. Sorry! |0ComeKillLah, Meh|Talk to me!| 09:40, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nothing amazing. User:Haloolah123/Sig 18:18, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Joking, right? bad_fetustalk 14:55, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unseccessful. ʞooɔ 20:53, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
Ornament kit
Description: The strongest metal armour, with a gold ornament trim received from Treasure Trails.
Reason: Good detail, great color combination, good angle, sol comes out nicely, without drawing too much attention. Just... wow.
- Support - As nominator. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 10:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - If you have a suggestion for a (shorter) description, please tell me, as i don't really know a good catchy description. Also, i don't know if links to other things are allowed in descriptions(if not please remove them) - Also, i already nominated this one, as the nomination for File:Rune g.png is done tomorrow and only has opposes. This shouldn't be that bad, also because it is about a different type of metal. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 10:17, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - He is wearing infinity boots, why not dragon boots?
Sentra246
10:20, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Because infinity has gold, i think. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:59, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- D boots would look better in it.
Sentra246
06:05, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I know, but it isn't there, and editing em in is not allowed. This is the best it gets i think, and i think it is really good already. Just 1 little thing that is a slight bit worse than it should. wow... not. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 11:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- D boots would look better in it.
- Neutral - Would Support if he was wearing Dragon Boots. Great picture for one of armour. - -Dr Merz 10:31, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Who in Jesus H Christ's name would trim their armour and fight. Just tell me kthxbai
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 12:40, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Does it matter for how nice the image is? Just tell me kthxbai JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:59, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppse - we have the sheild, the boots, the top, the bottom, the trim, the dragon icon on the chest, the fury amy, the skillcape cloth, the unmatching gloves, the sol, the fullhelm and its spikes and trim, the top of the skillcape, and two sets of sholder pads. Too much going on.
3rd age farcaster
15:47, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- And? what's wrong with much going on? that's much things summarized in one image. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:59, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Could you ppl please look at how nice or not the image is in your opinion, not if the armor is complete? A featured image is not about a complete set, it is about beautiful images. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:59, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- To me if the armour is not complete it is not a beautiful picture, that is one thing that makes a picture worth being featured.
Sentra246
06:05, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- So you can't enjoy an amazing Roman statue without arms?(if you would like roman statues, but i think you can imagine what i mean) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 11:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nothing impressive about it really. User:Haloolah123/Sig 17:19, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Looks good, though I agree that it should have d boots. User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 17:42, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - That is a great angle and very fitting armour accompanying the dragon, only... replace the gloves and boots by dragon ones.
They're not expensive if you look at the other stuff.
Fswe1
05:27, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Ye i know, but it is a shot of som1 else showing off @ the GE, so it is very hard to meet the guy again, as i didn't note his name... Still, i think the gloves and boots don't ruin the image, it is just a bit less super with them. Also, they both got gold in them so it is not very much change with compared to the armor... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 11:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - The experts have spoken. Top project Myface members LDP and Fswe1 have agreed with (<insert quality here>) member Joey. This is the strongest argument so far, so the consensus should be Support now.
JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 11:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- AEAE
3rd age farcaster
14:27, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- U c that
behind it? On RS:E it says emoticons are to show you didn't mean serious. I think
kinda explains that well, but appearantly you need explaination: It was a joke. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:39, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Jokes are funny. That wasn't. Now do u mind ending this discussion? Its a waist of time.
3rd age farcaster
22:06, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- U c that
- Oppose - It's a set of armour, you can see that every day if you want. There's nothing special there. 222 talk 07:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- You can't see such a full dragon (g) armor every day. I only saw the full armor once, during making this pic. I think you shouldn't say it like it's just something like full bronze or something, because it is actually the opposite. Or did you mean you can see it every day on the wiki
? JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 11:24, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Just a stupid set of armour, and it needs to be changed anyways, since it has infinity armour and staff of light within it. Also, Joeytye, I'm sick of you nominating every image of yours. bad_fetustalk 14:57, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I think you're just sick of me anyways, because we apprntly have other opinions in about anything: RS:D, here, etc. Also, i nom images i like, nothing is forbidden about that. Additionally, i just nominated 1 image for listing(so not replacing but listing) before (which i shouldn't have i see now) because someone commented on my talk it was an amazing image, and i also liked it very much. Noms for replacement are logic that you nominate it yourself, as it is kinda hard to let someone else nominate an image he doesn't know. Everyone who noms for replace does nom their own image. I think you thought when you saw i nominated this image: "Eeh, let's see, description, blah blah blah, ah, signed by joey, i hate him, let's oppose" I know you also don't like the image, but i think the fact you hate me(maybe) helps a lot too. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:39, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Too visually noisy. http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
20:46, September 15, 2010 (UTC)
“ | The image must be nominated by someone other than the person who uploaded the image. | ” |
Does this not disqualify your image? ʞooɔ 19:21, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed - Why do you need to ask cook? It couldn't possibly disqualify it more http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
19:59, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
Plane-freezer Lakhrahnaz
Description: A rather icy floating Stalker.
Reason: It looks very cool and menacing, especially the eyeballs and the transparency is done well.
- Frozen Support - As cookienator.
Fswe1
17:57, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's just a big eye... --Coolnesse 18:30, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - It looks gross. --LiquidTalk 19:20, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - The eye are a bit pixelated. --Iiii I I I 19:27, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Support- Pretty cool, but you should probably remove the extra period in the description. Krayfish 19:31, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - nah... pixelated eyes (i know it's still there with AA on) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:34, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like how detailed he is, and the transparency is well done, but I can't see him getting to the featured list.
Coelacanth0794 Talk
20:38, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support - Delicious. =D
Zap0i Talk
23:05, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The transparency and image are very good, but the eyes are way too pixel-y.
The Last Pun Talk
23:20, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Liquid. 222 talk 00:34, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's just a bit boring.
Sentra246
06:17, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Support - It needs felipe-style transparency. bad_fetustalk 18:17, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
- What? What would Felipe do differently?
The Last Pun Talk
02:28, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
- (s)he would make the frozen parts semi-transparent. bad_fetustalk 06:54, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't quite understand what you meant.
The Last Pun Talk
16:48, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't quite understand what you meant.
- (s)he would make the frozen parts semi-transparent. bad_fetustalk 06:54, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - per Liquid and Iii User:LordDarkPhantom/Signature 18:19, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - per smellyman and helm.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 12:38, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 20:07, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Occult floors
Description: The symbol of the most bizarre floors, deep in the dungeons of Daemonheim.
Reason: I like the purple.
- Support - As nominator. Can someone write a description for me? :3 --Iiii I I I 22:16, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like it. And I gave you a description.
Evil1888 Talk A's L
22:23, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Its not a really interesting image, and its removed from any context which might make it interesting (i.e. it should not have been given transparency) however I do have a better idea for a description, even though I don't support it, and it is "An arcane symbol found in the deepest recesses of Daemonheim." http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
22:28, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I like it as well. --Coolnesse 22:45, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Psycho. This is just a plain purple circle with nothing special. It does not deserve to be a featured image. --LiquidTalk 00:05, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - (my first in months) What is this? I don't even... It looks like a UFO, and seems very unnatural. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 02:08, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Rather weak oppose - I like it. A lot. But what Psycho said.
Fswe1
06:20, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per psycho. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 08:34, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Changed description from "The symbol of the most bizarre floors of Daemonheim." to "The symbol of the most bizarre floors, deep in the dungeons of Daemonheim." JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 08:34, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Isn't this also a violation of the thing at Runescape:Featured images?
“ | The image must be nominated by someone other than the person who uploaded the image. | ” |
— RS:FIMG
|
I think so, because you can also be proud you did the transparency, and this is
“ | To stop people from only doing it to get "credit" for their work. | ” |
— Degenret01 in Forum:Featured image modification discussion.
|
I don't know if it is, and there should be a rule about this too, as this is another case too. i think this could be qualified as a similar case as uploading your own image, as the transparency is the hardest part in most images. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 08:34, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- He just added transparency to the image. He didn't capture it. http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
08:39, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Though with many images, transparency is difficult, in this case, it is more simple, as it is simply a polygon. ∞I (yes, thats what I call you now) likely, while cleaning up images in need of transparency acknowledged the quality of said image and nominated it. And considering that ∞I had previously added more difficult transparency to images, such as this on, File:Fox Mask(male).png, one can infer that he is not nominating said image because he proud of himself with the transparency of the image, but while doing said task, saw the overall quality of the specific image. As a side-note, while browsing through ∞I's history, I saw other floors, which he added transparency to, but nominated this one out of all them, as the nominator decided that this one is of better quality than the others, and and his opinion, he thought that the wiki would come to a consensus that the image is of exceptional quality, and should be in the category of one of the best in the site. With all that said, it is highly unlikely that the image violates said policy. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 10:33, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Though with many images, transparency is difficult, in this case, it is more simple, as it is simply a polygon. ∞I (yes, thats what I call you now) likely, while cleaning up images in need of transparency acknowledged the quality of said image and nominated it. And considering that ∞I had previously added more difficult transparency to images, such as this on, File:Fox Mask(male).png, one can infer that he is not nominating said image because he proud of himself with the transparency of the image, but while doing said task, saw the overall quality of the specific image. As a side-note, while browsing through ∞I's history, I saw other floors, which he added transparency to, but nominated this one out of all them, as the nominator decided that this one is of better quality than the others, and and his opinion, he thought that the wiki would come to a consensus that the image is of exceptional quality, and should be in the category of one of the best in the site. With all that said, it is highly unlikely that the image violates said policy. http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
- Neutral - It should be a very, very, very weak oppose, but this is close enough. Per Psycho <--I still can't spell it right on first try... 222 talk 08:43, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - It has a nice angle, its in HD, and quite...purple. But I don't really understand the point of making it a featured image! I mean it isn't that special or rare...right??
1337rng3r|Talk
08:55, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per Psycho, it's a bit boring.
Sentra246
09:00, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Real is
brownpurple. bad_fetustalk 13:52, September 17, 2010 (UTC) - Neutral - If room is show, i support. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Felipebrs (talk) on 23:14, September 17, 2010 (UTC).
- Weak Oppose - It is remarking. However taking a photo at the floor in front of an entrance... Cannot fully outline the floor. Rewlf2 18:01, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Didn't understand a word of that...
--Iiii I I I 13:40, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Neither do i
JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 00:23, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Don't count on me being right, but I think it means that the slab of captured floor is not enough to let one see the the rest of the floor... I think... http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 10:08, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
- m'kay... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:15, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry for confusions. Let me clarify this: I won't select a tile on ground to be featured, it won't represent much meaning. Rewlf2 03:11, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- m'kay... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:15, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Don't count on me being right, but I think it means that the slab of captured floor is not enough to let one see the the rest of the floor... I think... http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
- Neither do i
- Notice of intent - Deadline extended until September 30, 2010. --LiquidTalk 22:12, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Slight Support - Per Chess.
Zap0i Talk
12:08, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I didn't know this until now O_O, and I didn't take the picture from the entrance. I took it from the Fremmenik banker.
SpineTalk
21:42, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not too impressive. User:Haloolah123/Sig 16:31, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed -
Nomination is unsuccessful. ʞooɔ 19:56, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Starlight
Description:The strongest unicorn around.
Reason: I like the armour.
- Support - As nominator.
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 09:36, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - AMG, a unicorn! I shall call him Sparkles Fantastics!
Evil1888 Talk A's L
09:54, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support - I like that it is in motion, but the angle is a bit awkward. The colors are ok... (Oh, and didn't ∞I want to nominate a unicorn?) http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 10:02, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose- I just don't like it for some reason, i don't think it's a good enough subject to be a FI.Sentra246
10:09, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate on how its not a good subject to be an FI, please?
Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 10:11, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -
Very small. Perhaps you should wait until Joeytje50 (or someone else, like me, who helped a little) retakes it using the OoO. There is a GWD monster image revolution going on; see the image of Balfrug for example.Fswe1
12:35, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - MUCH too small. It needs a new pic, and then it will have a good chance. This creature really has much potential of becoming a featured image. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:19, October 4, 2010 (UTC)- Support - much better image now. The previous image was good already, but much too small. This one is better angle, size, detail etc. so i definetely support JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 10:51, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support - Great image, but too small. bad_fetustalk 15:41, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I LOVE PONIES User:Swizzl3d/Sig 16:08, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose-The lighting and angle...could be a LOT better.User:Haloolah123/Sig 16:09, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - Much better now. I can support this. User:Haloolah123/Sig 11:55, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
*Comment - Like Fswe1 has suggested, the image has been improved. Please reconsider your votes. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:56, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- I kinda meant after the nomination, because you're not aloud to change the image during one. Be prepared to see that image reverted soon...
Fswe1
19:11, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Ye, but the nom wasnt a day old... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 21:00, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- There was this guy who had average marks of 9,8 at his exams; extremely high. The universities wanted him and he tried to join the best. However, he was rejected the first year because he forgot to put a stamp on his lettre. This is the same case. It's stupid, but it's a rule.
Fswe1
11:38, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- You do know that we don't have to follow stupid rules? bad_fetustalk 13:04, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Goodie!
Fswe1
17:21, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Rules are awesome. --Coolnesse 22:16, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Goodie!
- You do know that we don't have to follow stupid rules? bad_fetustalk 13:04, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- There was this guy who had average marks of 9,8 at his exams; extremely high. The universities wanted him and he tried to join the best. However, he was rejected the first year because he forgot to put a stamp on his lettre. This is the same case. It's stupid, but it's a rule.
- Ye, but the nom wasnt a day old... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 21:00, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
*Support - kewl JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:56, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It just doesn't seem right to feature this image, kinda like what Sentra said. 222 talk 03:53, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - What is this I don't even. --Coolnesse 22:16, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, sir, this is an unicorn in armour, which is located in the boss room of the Saradomin Encampment of the godwars dungeon. It's name is Starlight. Is this enough information? JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 22:29, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed - Nomination is unsuccessful as the image was changed mid-nomination. Feel free to resubmit however. http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu33/Psycho_Robot/Sigs%20and%20Avatars/kitty.pngPsycho Robot talk
06:09, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
Helm of trials
Description: The exclusive headwear of a grand adventurer.
Reason: I'm not sure why I like it, but it's somehow different from other detailed item images on the wiki.
- Support - As nominator. bad_fetustalk 18:18, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - It's OK, but without AA. The looks are cool though. Description: The exclusive headwear of a grand adventurer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fswe1 (talk).
- Changed the description. bad_fetustalk 07:30, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I forgot to sign, didn't I...?
Fswe1
10:02, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes.
Sentra246
10:03, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes.
- Oppose - A bit boring especially since half of the image is white/transparent.
Sentra246
07:31, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nothing stunning here. User:Haloolah123/Sig 07:36, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Borrrinnnngggggg. --Coolnesse 10:39, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - The transparency is boring, since it is missing an inside, and the horse is ugly http://i1016.photobucket.com/albums/af290/porp109/sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcats
Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 14:03, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Why is the
ruminside gone?Murd3rlogistTalk• Contribs • Sign here 14:47, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - Helm again. >.< --LiquidTalk 14:48, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Support - It's a helm. --Iiii I I I 14:52, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's boring, and at first I thought it was some sort of bird. ~MuzTalk 15:59, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per li6 222 talk 02:05, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Half oppose - No AA and not very much wow effect. It is however a nice item and could become FI if it has AA and bigger - I got a bigger, AA version. Shall i upload it and reset this discussion, or will you stay at same thoughts about the inside?(It's exactly the same angle, just bigger with AA) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 10:47, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I think you are supposed to wait till this ends and then re-nominate it if you want that version to be fimg. bad_fetustalk 16:37, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- But what if it fails? you aren't allowed to nom your own images, exept for replacement. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 19:55, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- What? Since when?!
Fswe1
12:31, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Since some yg thread passed. Anyways, Joey, I really don't know what you are supposed to do in that situation. I'd say use common sense and do it, but someone may be mad at it, so try asking someone else. bad_fetustalk 15:39, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- since the closing of Forum:Featured image modification, so exactly 5,291 days ago... - Aargh... u said it b4 me... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 15:51, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- What? Since when?!
- But what if it fails? you aren't allowed to nom your own images, exept for replacement. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 19:55, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
Request for closure - nom request. A new version has already been uploaded bad_fetustalk 16:23, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, it could as well continue, and reverted once the thing is over... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:58, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - Meh... Decent.
Zap0i Talk
01:48, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Horrible Angle
Rhys Talk
18:37, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
- What angle would be better then? (If you read this after the closing, please answer on my talk) JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:28, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong oppose - What is so great about this image? It's dull and boring.
- REDIRECT User:-Matt/sig 01:33, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Closed - Unsuccessful.
--Iiii I I I 15:38, October 9, 2010 (UTC)