(Fixed link) |
m (r/m red links) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{nutshell|Lying is unethical and hurts the project.}} |
{{nutshell|Lying is unethical and hurts the project.}} |
||
| − | '''Honesty''' is expected in all processes of the RuneScape Wiki, including content discussion, the dispute process and all other functions of the community. Editors are reminded that while you may expect an [[ |
+ | '''Honesty''' is expected in all processes of the RuneScape Wiki, including content discussion, the dispute process and all other functions of the community. Editors are reminded that while you may expect an [[wikipedia:WP:AGF|assumption of good faith]], this is based on the counter-assumption of honesty in your actions. |
==Honesty in actions== |
==Honesty in actions== |
||
An honest Wikian: |
An honest Wikian: |
||
| − | *'''Does not''' cite sources they know to be unreliable, or represent sources with a bias as being neutral. In cases involving articles with a very long list of citations, not all citations may be fully examined, and editors should not abuse this tendency as an avoidance of the [[ |
+ | *'''Does not''' cite sources they know to be unreliable, or represent sources with a bias as being neutral. In cases involving articles with a very long list of citations, not all citations may be fully examined, and editors should not abuse this tendency as an avoidance of the [[wikipedia:WP:CITE|citation requirements]]. |
*'''Does not''' intentionally misrepresent their identity or credentials. The choice of anonymity and pseudonymity is part of Wikipedia, but it is not a license to fabricate real world credentials. It is strongly recommended that you decline to share details you wish to keep secret rather than to invent alternatives. Fabrication of credentials will lose an editor credibility and damage the credibility of the project as a whole. |
*'''Does not''' intentionally misrepresent their identity or credentials. The choice of anonymity and pseudonymity is part of Wikipedia, but it is not a license to fabricate real world credentials. It is strongly recommended that you decline to share details you wish to keep secret rather than to invent alternatives. Fabrication of credentials will lose an editor credibility and damage the credibility of the project as a whole. |
||
*'''Does not''' say things they know to be untrue simply to support their argument. |
*'''Does not''' say things they know to be untrue simply to support their argument. |
||
| − | *'''Does not''' argue or act in favor of something they think is wrong. [[ |
+ | *'''Does not''' argue or act in favor of something they think is wrong. [[wikipedia:WP:POINT|Disruptive point making]] is one of the most oft-cited and important real-world examples of this. |
| − | *'''Does''' comply with the conflict of interest guideline. Per the [[:m:Privacy policy|privacy policy]], editors may remain pseudonymous. The conflict of interest guideline strongly encourages editors to disclose when they edit on topics where their real world employment, family, and other connections may create an appearance of impropriety. Such disclosures, if made, should be factual; and although editors may decline to give information, false denials would be dishonest. |
+ | *'''Does''' comply with the [[wikipedia:WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guideline. Per the [[:m:Privacy policy|privacy policy]], editors may remain pseudonymous. The conflict of interest guideline strongly encourages editors to disclose when they edit on topics where their real world employment, family, and other connections may create an appearance of impropriety. Such disclosures, if made, should be factual; and although editors may decline to give information, false denials would be dishonest. |
*'''Does''' proffer all relevant information to a discussion, even when it might not support their argument. Withholding of information that contradicts other information, or filtering out data-points that do not match one's assumptions, is dishonesty by omission. |
*'''Does''' proffer all relevant information to a discussion, even when it might not support their argument. Withholding of information that contradicts other information, or filtering out data-points that do not match one's assumptions, is dishonesty by omission. |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
| − | * [[Wikipedia:Gaming the system]] |
+ | * [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Gaming the system]] |
| − | |||
| − | [[fa:ویکیپدیا:صداقت]] |
||
| − | [[ko:위키백과:정직]] |
||
Revision as of 02:03, 9 March 2010
Adapted from Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Honesty
 |
This page in a nutshell: Lying is unethical and hurts the project. |
Honesty is expected in all processes of the RuneScape Wiki, including content discussion, the dispute process and all other functions of the community. Editors are reminded that while you may expect an assumption of good faith, this is based on the counter-assumption of honesty in your actions.
Honesty in actions
An honest Wikian:
- Does not cite sources they know to be unreliable, or represent sources with a bias as being neutral. In cases involving articles with a very long list of citations, not all citations may be fully examined, and editors should not abuse this tendency as an avoidance of the citation requirements.
- Does not intentionally misrepresent their identity or credentials. The choice of anonymity and pseudonymity is part of Wikipedia, but it is not a license to fabricate real world credentials. It is strongly recommended that you decline to share details you wish to keep secret rather than to invent alternatives. Fabrication of credentials will lose an editor credibility and damage the credibility of the project as a whole.
- Does not say things they know to be untrue simply to support their argument.
- Does not argue or act in favor of something they think is wrong. Disruptive point making is one of the most oft-cited and important real-world examples of this.
- Does comply with the conflict of interest guideline. Per the privacy policy, editors may remain pseudonymous. The conflict of interest guideline strongly encourages editors to disclose when they edit on topics where their real world employment, family, and other connections may create an appearance of impropriety. Such disclosures, if made, should be factual; and although editors may decline to give information, false denials would be dishonest.
- Does proffer all relevant information to a discussion, even when it might not support their argument. Withholding of information that contradicts other information, or filtering out data-points that do not match one's assumptions, is dishonesty by omission.