600613
600613 Talk • Contribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk edits • Edit count
After I withdrawn my first RFA, I have decided to nominate myself again. I have improved myself over the last 2 months or so. Been active in the community, getting my edit count to over 5000, helped people create their own templated signatures to use in discussions, and being active in anti-vandal work. I also tend to take part in removing red links from the wanted files and pages lists. That's enough said. 
• NnK Oliver • (600613) talk 04:51, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
I, 600613, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, • NnK Oliver • (600613) talk 04:51, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
I'd most likely to use it for reverting vandalism, but also for other situations that needs sysop tools.
2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?
Putting on the missing Magic damage values on the articles that do not have them yet.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Some edit conflicts, but I controlled myself. Doing the same in the future.
Additional questions (asked by the community if necessary)
Discussion
Pending - Judging by your answered questions, it doesn't seem you especially need the tools, but I would like to see some other users' opinion before stating a Support or an Oppose. Ruud (talk)(Suggest me naems) 04:55, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Pending - Per Ruud. ~ 
Sentry Telos Talk 10:09, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose/Not Yet - By the way you answered the above questions and said why you think you should be an admin, it seems to me that you don't really care about being an admin or even that you can't be bothered to come up with some decent answers - I'm worried that when you have these tools, you might do things like deleting pages and especially blocking users as quickly as you answered the questions, causing some trouble (users who were blocked for minor offences, pages that deserve to exist being deleted...). Also, your previous RfA was only 2 months ago, and I don't think you've really improved on the points that were said there, like participating in discussions. 
Oil4 Talk 18:50, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose/Not Yet - Per Oli. User:Stelercus/Signature 19:52, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose/Not yet - Per Oli. --LiquidTalk 19:57, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - Without even needing to look at your contributions, the way you answered the above questions leads me to believe that you neither need nor are ready for sysop tools at this time. Andrew talk 21:19, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Support - I think that you are a great help to the community and edit a lot! 
Ppi802 
21:23, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comment - Why are you requesting adminship, exactly? From your answers, you sound rather disinterested. User:Stelercus/Signature 21:47, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Not Yet - Per Oli Gragon 126 Talk 23:37, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
Support - Per Ppi --HaloTalk 23:41, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
- How does editing a lot require sysop tools, just a question. http://i698.photobucket.com/albums/vv341/Rwojy/scoot4.pngscooties 23:43, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
Request closure - Changed my mind, I don't want to be a sysop at the time being. • NnK Oliver • (600613) talk 23:37, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
Closed - Nominee has withdrawn.--
01:31, March 5, 2010 (UTC)