Replacement filing cabinet
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current project page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.
Replacement filing cabinet
1  2  3  4  5  6

Requests for adminship

Cashman286 (2)


Support - 4
Oppose - 5
Neutral - 0

Gulp...I'm going to nominate myself. I have a very unimpressive 42 mainspace edits, but I have 210+ forum edits. Perhaps I can be a forum sysop? I know that some of you are prejudiced against people who nominate themselves...but I (kind of) have confidence that some of you would support me. this has been on my mind since last month, and I was going to nominate myself at the end of May, or the start of June, but the temptation took the best of me, and well, I self-nominated. If this doesn't go well, I will nominate myself again in a little while, like sometime in June. Well, *gulp* I hope I get lucky! Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 01:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Only chia follows the self nomination philosophy. As for me... Support!Yellow partyhat Ilyas Talk Contribs 01:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Support I stand strong with my vote.OnyxMalestro01:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
And you are...? Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 01:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Poo I'm not logged in.. its malestro.
Sorry I fixed OnyxMalestro01:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Support as a forum sysop. I think you would be good. But I don't think normal sysop powers should be registered for awhile. So if forum only powers are given then i support as above. Self-nominating doesn't bother me. But I think you might be struck down by a few people. 01:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. --Wowbagger421 01:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Not enough useful contributions, and a self-nom in this case didn't help much. You can't just have sysop powers on the forums, the forums here don't run like those on a normal fansite - they're woven right into the Wiki. In my opinion, someone with a bit of a different attitude would be nice. Maybe another time.  AScott00  Rubber chicken 01:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose. On another note, unless we move the forums offsite, it is impossible to be only a forum mod. Also, from now on, I will be basing my votes on the new rules I suggested on the talk page Sysop crown Megalodon99 (Talk) score 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I think he's aware that the forums are not separate but rather part of the wiki and that sysop powers apply there too. What he probably meant was to help out with archiving forums and deleting unused forums... etc.Yellow partyhat Ilyas Talk Contribs 01:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Yay! I created a debate! =D Too bad half the votes are opposed. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 10:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

By the way, don't be hatin' on da cash man! Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 11:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. I know Cashman in real life and he is responsible enough and does edit. >>>Chaos runeDeadalive302, (level=37)talkChaos rune 14:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Most admin have had over 500 edits before they became a admin. I do think that, if the forums were moved off-site, then you would make a great forum mod. Tesfan 18:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose You already have the wrong idea about being an admin from the beginning.. It's not that bad, but ti's not good either. Aurora (talk)15:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Please archive this so I can re-open this. I just made my 500th edit, and it would be a more positive way to nominate myself. Dragon daggerCashman286talk contribs editcount my RFAGranite maul 16:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

May as well, it's over the 2 week time limit for RfAs... Oddlyoko talk 16:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)


Current Votes

  • Support - 0
  • Oppose - 5
  • Neutral - 0
  • Takes a deep breath" I'm going to (gasp) nominate myself. As selfish as I am I feel bad more myself, If I be an admin, I'd keep this wiki clean of spammers, vandals, and personal attackers. *Takes another deep breath*, I bet i'll get alot of opposes but, what the hay? I just want to see if people think I'm good enough to be an admin. *Takes 1 last deep breath*, forgive due to me nominating myself. How selfish I am. =|. Before you oppose me, please note that I reverted alot of edits by User:Buck nell. Thank you. --Blankothe3rd 07:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Weak Oppose I really don't know you that well which probally means you have a very small presence in the community. I'm not very familiar with your edits either. Don't worry I don't judge people for nominating themselves. --Whiplash 13:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Soft Short Oppose maybe early =/ SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs

Oppose. Too early. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Opposes Softly Don't know you. Become active in your edits and the community, and also wait till you've been here longer. Seems promising though. Keep up the good work.OnyxMalestro15:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Oppose. Never seen you before you made this RfA. Do some more edits and wait a few months. Dragon chainbodyEmosworldSysop crown 21:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


Final Votes

  • Support - 6
  • Oppose - 1
  • Neutral - 1

Hi all. I hate nominating myself, but I wanted to make it known that I'd like to have admin rights. I have only been here for a few months, but if you look at my contributions you can see I've already been acting like an admin, only without the shortcuts that an admin would have. Though my mainspace edits are only in the low hundreds, I think you can see that they are high quality and professional.

Before you object to my time on the Wiki or the number of edits I've made, keep in mind that the sysop position isn't a glorified editor position. Users should not be given sysop based on their time here or the number of their edits, but on their proven ability to carry out administrative tasks. That said, I'm open to whatever opinions you may have.

I may note that I'll be on vacation starting Friday, so I may just let responses build up until my return the following Sunday. Don't think I'm ignoring this thread. Endasil (Talk) @ 18:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

You've been here a little over a month. I don't even know you lol. Red partyhatDreadnoughttalk 01:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the response...though I don't know what to say other than "ok." As I tried to carefully say in my paragraph above, I'm not seeking this position because I'm chummy with all the other sysops, because I believe that's the type of environment we're trying to avoid, and I'm not seeking this position because I've been here a long time or make major contributions. Major contributions should have no bearing on your ability to perform administrative duties. You can continue making major contributions without administrative authority. The point was, I am seeking admin because I already have been performing administrative duties, and would like to make that easier on myself to do. Just take a look at my contributions and you can see what I do most on the Wiki. Hi, I'm Endasil by the way :) Endasil (Talk) @ 02:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I see the "all editors are equal" policy thrown around quite a bit, and you're definitely better than the random person who wanders in off the internet and goes for an RfA. Going through your contributions, I like what I see. Nearly half (exactly if you round up the percentage) your edits are mainspace, and they are quality edits. Even if this is too soon, or if we've got enough admins for the time being, I think you'd make a good sysop. You've got my support.  AScott00  Rubber chicken 04:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Not yet - You are a good editor, but you've only been here for a month (or so). In a few months or a couple hundred edits I'll support. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 04:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Support - Conditions apply - I'm not an advocate for self-nominations... at least you're being bold. :) However, it's been a short while since you've joined (I did, in fact, read the nomination), and you may not have the trust of others to become an administrator... also, unlike me, you actually know what you're talking about. =P I'll support, so long as you pinky promise to use good judgement. *Raises pinky* --Sαcrε (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 05:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment. I've not checked anything you've done but I'd just like to say, you certainly seem to have the right attitude towards sysop powers. I don't really have time to check what you've done at the moment, sorry - if you bug me in-game I might... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 06:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you all for your comments thus far. I respect all of your opinions, and while I've argued that edit count and length of time shouldn't be a factor in whether one becomes a sysop, I do understand that both are essential in becoming trusted by the community. I'd like to shortly share why I am seeking admin powers. I am for the most part seeking just the roll-back capability and the delete page capability, because I often end up reverting vandalism and marking pages for speedy deletions. So, I'm going to leave my nomination open for the next week. As I've said above, I'll be gone for the coming week. Feel free to post your support or criticisms while I'm gone, and again, please don't think I'm ignoring you. I just don't know how many internet cafes I'd be able to hit up while backpacking in Scotland :-). Endasil (Talk) @ 18:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes you seem to have the maturity and good intentions that mabey some of our past hopefulls mabey haven't, however you should be here just a bit longer before you get privalleges just to get to know you in the community. ^^ Best of luck. --Whiplash 22:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Support. I've watched a lot of your edits and I'm impressed with the contributions you've made here. Keep up the good work. Hunter TIRRIANGANT (TALK)02:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Support. You really know how to edit. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Notice of Intent: Endasil will be sysoped on Friday May 11th unless there is objection now. --Whiplash 15:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral I don't know what tto think write now. I may change my vote.. OnyxMalestro16:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

BTW it's the 11th. and Support SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs 10:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

User "Endasil" is now a sysop. --Whiplash 10:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

O-M-G! Endasil was supported and sysopped at same minute! ^^ User page "Katshuma" Talk page 19:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


Final votes:

  • Support-13
  • Oppose-1
  • Neutral-1

Wowbagger421 is seeking sysop powers. He has been a member since 8 June 2006, but has especially been active since March, amassing over 500 edits. Wowbagger has shown a great variety in his edits, ranging from user-relations to information in the namespace. He has built several articles dealing with prayer and has also worked in categories and typographic edits. Additionally, he has a good record, having never committed vandalism nor even butt heads with another user. Woodcutting-iconHyenastetalk 23:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Support-It's true. He is extremely helpful at times and most pages he contributed helped me alot. I bet he will be a great so what awesome admin.White partyhat Patcong talk White partyhat23:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, indeed, but I say Neutral because he has only 500 edits you say? I don't quite think that's enough, but Wowbagger sure does has enough expierience with the wiki. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 00:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
817, but who's counting ;) --Wowbagger421 00:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Why do you always base on edits Chia? Read the third bullet under rules...edit count and admin ability do NOT go hand in hand. Support. Endasil (Talk) @ 13:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Support im surprised he is not already. --Whiplash 00:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Support. --Sαcrε (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 01:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, so more than 500 edits. That's better. :) But I shall not yet say support, but instead Answer Pending. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 01:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Support Definately overdue. Good work! Chaoticar 10:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Total Support. A great editor, mature, hard working, contributes good content. --Eucarya Talk 23:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Answer has pended! New answer: Neutral, still Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 18:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't really have much of an impression of you yet, so, Neutral. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 46) 20:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral. Lol, I have never talked to him/her or tracked his/her edits. My vote doesn't really count. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 05:28, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Play with fire, you're gonna get burned Wowbagger. {{Signatures/Total Rune}}19:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Very mature. --Wowbagger421 19:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

SUPPORT! - I changed my mind. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 20:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Support You have been here a long time, and proven yourself trustworthy. Sysop crown Megalodon99 (Talk) score 12:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I think before we should sysop you we should let the neutrals change their minds. --Whiplash 14:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Ok. I'll ask them if their opinion of me has changed recently. --Wowbagger421 21:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Support, for all reasons above. Oddlyoko 06:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Forgot to sign, oops!
Support. Changed my mind. Darn, you're a excellent organizer, just like me. ^^ I think we really need people like you. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 05:43, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
I think we could sysop you on Monday the 14th. --Whiplash 18:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support: Know him from far back, great editor. Huanghe63talk 02:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Support.: Me and him reverted that Perverts edits lickity split! [[File:Bring it down now!.gif|50px]] The King Of Fakes.' - Thoust Desire to talk? - The Royal Fakes.'

Thanks for the support, everyone. --Wowbagger421 22:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Support can't think why not? =P SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs 02:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

It's the 14th btw. SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs 02:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

User "Wowbagger421" is now a sysop --Whiplash 10:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


This user has massive main edits and is very active. Nice and helpful and participates in discussions when he cans. He would make a great administrator. Don't forget my vote goes to support too. OnyxMalestro13:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Final Votes

Support - 2
Oppose - 0
Neutral - 3

I'm performing nicely here without admin rights so I'm not so sure if I need to be nominated, so I say Neutral to myself. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Um, if you're neutralling yourself then so will I. I mean, shouldn't you be supporting yourself? Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 14:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hm.... I say Pending I need time to think. SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs 14:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't want to support myself. I'm not so good anyway. I'm fine as just normal editer. If Malestro would have nominated me a week ago I would have withdrawn. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 16:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Katshuma, if you are not comfortable being a sysop, you can just deny the nomination. That way it won't go down in history as a failed vote, and if you decide later that you would like to be a sysop, we can have this discussion then. Endasil (Talk) @ 16:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't want to force you to anything you don't want to do or feel incapable of the pressure.  :D I just thought you'd like to know that I thought you worthy of this. You seemed to imply wanting it above in the gangsterls vote, and I checked into your history and your activity, and I saw you really looked like a deserving editor. Sorry. OnyxMalestro17:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

You have made over 1,100 main space edits, I say Support  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tesfan (talk) on 22:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

Sorry Malestro, you only should have asked me first. And thanks Endasil. (Wow, you really are good.) I withdraw from this. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 11:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Katshuma has withdrawn from this nomination. Please vote no more.


I want to try to become an administrator, because in the past few days i have been doing nothing but helping out articles by pressing the random page button and see if anythng needs to be done. Farming-icon Matt talk Runecrafting-icon 22:14, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Current Votes

Support - 0
Oppose - 9
Neutral - 1
heh. me 2. Neutral SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs 00:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Only 59 mainspace edits. Tesfan 12:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. Sysop crown Megalodon99 (Talk) score 12:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral {{}}20:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

NOTE: Only registered users can vote. :( Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 23:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I edited the tally to not count the Ip dude to make it fair. Farming-icon Matt talk Runecrafting-icon 22:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: As I wrote on your talk page (which you chose to ignore), "Edits like this should be marked as minor, and as they don't even change the look of the actual page, I highly doubt they are even necessary. Methinks you're just trying to get your edit count up. Stop." You're just trying to raise your edit count and the fact that you're doing it in that way is utterly annoying. Don't try to fool the wiki. Christine 22:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm not and remember the article of assume good faith, sacre fi always mentions? Well i was trying to make the category thingy move down to make it look less cramped.

Farming-icon Matt  talk Runecrafting-icon 22:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot to say that I am NEUTRAL in this request. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 02:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Extreme oppose after last night's edit war I say a definate no. --Whiplash 13:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I do feel the need to bump my vote up to an EXTREME oppose per what Whiplash said. The minor edits do not bother me so much now, but that is NO WAY FOR A SYSOP TO ACT. Adamant crossbowChristineRune defender.:Super:..:Spunky:. 13:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
What was the edit war? I changing my vote to mild oppose Syugecinspam 14:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Oppose, You're bordering noobity! Have you no shame! Aurora (talk)05:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Oppose All users, especially Mods, are not supposed to engage in Edit Wars. Chaoticar 05:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Oppose per above comments. You clearly do not have the maturity or attitude of a sysop. Endasil (Talk) @ 20:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
RESPONCE TO CHAOTICAR AND ENDASIL: Mods? You mean admins? And Endasil, what do you mean by "You clearly do not have the maturity or attitude of a sysop"??? If you're making a reference to the recent edit war, that was a mature thing to do (but not to continue) and he did not at all blow his top, especially when compared to Gangsterls, and definately not me when 1472 came to town...4 times! Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 23:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, Chia, but there's a difference between what me and you did and what Moogel did. I lost my temper because Moogel was repeatedly vandalizing even after being asked to stop. This was inappropriate and I have apologized for it. You flipped on 1472 for pretty much the same reasons. Moogel's actions were different from ours in that nothing was wrong with them initially, but he didn't stop. Even after 3 other users (me, blankothe3rd) including an admin (you) had told him that the pages shouldn't have been censored, he continued. Yes, he remained calm, but not very mature (he had a conversation about relegion with blankothe3rd in the edit summaries while they reverted each others' edits, and continuing in itself was immature). I can't say any of our actions were the best possible that day, even yours Chia (why didn't you block Moogel for a short period instead of allowing the edit war to continue?), but I feel that Moogel's displayed a disregard for the opinions of other users and the autority of administrators. Until I see a change in this, I will have to add my oppose to the list. Slayer-icon Gangsterls Divination-icon talk00:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Not to mention that stupid little edit war you got into with me that Ilyas had to settle. I told you repeatedly it wasn't proper grammar, wasn't a compltete sentence and what do you reply with? it sounds better the way i revised it. No, you can't act like that if you'd like to be a sysop. Dungeon map icon Christine 01:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


Final votes:

  • Support-14
  • Oppose-1
  • Neutral-0

I have written many of our quest guides including Recipe for Disaster, Regicide, Mourning's Ends Part 1 and 2. I was also the original creator of RuneScape:Userboxes and have created several of the most popular ones including Template:Userbox/member, the original versions of Template:Userbox/rare, Template:Userbox/guild, and Template:Userbox/free player. I was the user of the month for April 2007.

P.S. I know that I'm not supposed to nominate myself because of the new rules, but I have done so anyway as per RuneScape:All editors are equal, WP:IAR, and my comments on the talk page. Dtm142 23:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. Dtm has written over 100 quest guides, most of which have probably been used by all of you at one time or another. His guides are detailed, accurate, and he devotes his time and efforts into them. Over 900 total edits, nearly 650 mainspace. He even won user of the month for April 2007 for his hard work! Slayer-icon Gangsterls Divination-icon talk23:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I Oppose because you can't nominate youself. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 04:41, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
You nominated yourself Chia. o_O Christine 11:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Somewhat support I think your a very trustworthy user and did alot of great work on the quest guides. However I haven't actually seen you do alot of reverting or reporting vandalism mabey I just haven't look hard enough but I don't think il let that get in the way. :) --Whiplash 13:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Support I agree with whiplash when he says "I think your a very trustworthy user and did alot of great work on the quest guides". And, i think that if your good enough to be a user of the month, your good enough to be an admin. Tesfan 15:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Support the nominating-yourself policy is bogus anyway, it's there to stop people who clearly won't get sysop from wasting space. DTM is clearly eligible for sysop. Let's try actually looking at users, Chia, instead of basing our decisions on edit counts and silly rules. If no one nominates a user like DTM, that's our fault as a community, not his fault as a user. Endasil (Talk) @ 15:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Endasil on that point I find that oh you cant become a sysop because you nominated yourself bullshit. The guideline should be changed. --Whiplash 18:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Support Good editor, made edits to several policy pages. Also Chia the self-nominating rule is currently being debated, so should be considered null (until a decision is made). Chaoticar 01:21, 6 May 2007 (UTC) swore! An admin used strong language! The apocalype is here! Nooooooooooooooooooo!!!!! And Support. If he was a user of the month, he should definetely become a sysop. Talk-to Cashman286(Level 48) 15:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Support. Good editor. Seems reasonably trustworthy. The only minor point is the self nomination, where it would only have taken a simple message to any of the wiki community to write a nomination. I would have written one. --Miw 12:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Support and support again. I was thinking to nominate Dtm142 too, should have just asked. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 14:10, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Asking someone to nominate you is essentially the same as nominating yourself in my opinion, so I decided to skip that step and just go for it. Who the nominator is doesn't matter to me. Who the nominee is matters. Thank you for the support to everyone who commented so far. Dtm142 22:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Support: Personally, the "can't nominate yourself" thing is a bad idea for RfA. I like it for "featured editors" - cause it makes sense - but if you want admin powers, you ask and the community votes. Nominations should only add credibility, not be a requirement. Nonetheless, again, I support. Oddlyoko 23:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Support - great content creator! --Eucarya Talk 07:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

He isn't an admin? OMG. Support SyugecinDragon halberdtalkcontribs 11:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Support I've used many of his quest guides and found them very helpful. Huanghe63talk 02:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Whole-hearted support. --Sαcrε (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 19:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Hehehe! I'm the only one who is opposing...Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 20:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

w00t?... Dtm142 20:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Notice of Intent: Dtm142 will be sysoped on May 21st 2007 unless there is objection now. --Whiplash 10:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Support. The only person objecting is Chiafriend, who doesn't really have a good reason for opposing anyways. You can't use "you can't nominate yourself", you need something more concrete than that. I don't like the self-nominating stuff much, but it's not against rules (although the rules keeps changing) so either change your vote or come up with a better reason. Hunter TIRRIANGANT (TALK) 18:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
COMMENT: At the time it was a rule, so don't be all playah' haten' on me for trying to remind rules that were around at the time. And if I have to have a reason for opposing then everyone should have a reason for supporting. Dragon helmChiafriend12Granite body (old)I have 12 friends. 23:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
We don't hate you (well, I don't at least). And yes, everyone who does oppose an RFA should have a good reason. The self nominating rule has since been defeated soundly and later abolished. Dtm142 02:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

User "Dtm142" is now a sysop --Whiplash 11:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Blankothe3rd (2)

Current Votes:

  • Support - 1
  • Oppose - 1
  • Neutral - 0

Yes, I feel foolish for self nominating myself right after I failed to become an admin. I feel that I made enough edits to think I can be confident enough to nominate myself. I have made an impressive 619 overall edits. Although I'll expect to get many opposes I just feel confident enough to vote myself a Neutral. Blankothe3rd 00:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

I admire all people who have the confidence to self-nominate. I would never. But, I will ask you, do you feel that if you are an admin you will push harder, stay the same, or just forget you are one? Until the question comes answered, Neutral. Syugecinspam 02:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I will push harder, as you see. I've done good as a regular user and have reverted many edits by Buck Nell and I Love Sodomy. Reverting bad or unuseful and Blocking abusive users will be my main priorty if I ever get to become a admin. I do my best to revert even as a regular account. Although staying a non-sysop would be O.K. Becoming a sysop would help me delete un-needed pages. Whenever I see a bad edit, I do my best to remove it. If a User commits Vandalism, I shall warn them, then block them. Until then, I'll do my best as a non-sysop. Blankothe3rd 03:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
You seem to be headed in the right direction. You have my Support until further notice Syugecinspam 11:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Oppose, I'm afraid. I'm not sure what difference you thought a couple days would make, but you just don't have nearly enough mainspace editing experience. Most of your contributions have been in the slang category. Endasil (Talk) @ 03:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Reply, it wasn't only a couple days, it was at least a month. And no, the slang edits were from Moogel Censoring the f word, if you don't like it thats ok. Cause I don't like you. Blankothe3rd 01:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
um.. That wasn't very nice. Syugecinspam 02:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Judge on the Content, not the contribitor, Endasil. Blankothe3rd 02:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
He is judging the content... where is he judging you? --Sαcrε (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 02:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Ummm.....Oppose!,not a really good editor, and you made the black jesus thing, adn can't really control your mouth.White partyhat Patcong talk White partyhat02:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.