RuneScape Wiki
Register
Advertisement

I R Zaros

I R Zaros TalkContribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk editsEdit count

I would like to nominate I R Zaros to become an administrator because he is a hard working editor on the Runescape Wiki. I have seen his contributions, making many neat and very helpful edits. He is always patrolling, cleaning up the smallest of articles all the way to editing the biggest, hunting down those who cause trouble, and helping those who are new to the Wiki. It is a shame that this hero of the Wiki is only limited to small powers, if he was given the right tools, he would be a God, and the Wiki would become the best place for Runescape information. I R Zaros for Administration. --It's a tricorn! Micha499 14:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC).

I, I R Zaros, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realise that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, Zaros FTW! I R Zaros 14:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC).

Discussion

Question: If I do become a Runescape Wiki Administrator, do I also become an administrator on other Wikis such as Funorb Wiki? Zaros FTW! I R Zaros 15:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment/Answer - you would only become an administrator on this wiki. Andrew talk 19:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment/Answer to Comment/Answer - Ok thanks. Zaros FTW! I R Zaros 19:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Neutral - Lots of good edits, lots of contributions, great editor. Only concern is that the RfA is so soon to a major come back. Based on the contributions there is like 300 edits on 3 days, which seems a bit much as compared to the age of the account the edits received before that. Other then that, good user and contributor.

22:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Neutral - per Bonziiznob. I may change to support or oppose based on your edits in the next few days. Changed to Oppose per Azaz. Didn't the read the nomination as closely as I should. Be "a God"? What? Also, I don't recall any vandalism reports. Maybe you have contributed to a few community discussions, but not as many as you probably should have judging by your time here. File:Rollbackcrown.PNG Kudos 2 U Talk! Edit count! Contribs! 02:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment - A good editor doesn't make a good sysop. I don't recall you reverting vandalism, reporting vandalism, contributing to community discussions, or doing anything else that shows you would benefit from gaining these tools. I'm also a little concerned no one has found fault with the nominator claiming that "if he was given the right tools, he would be a God".--

03:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Azaz. Although you have a decent edit count, I have never seen you revert/report vandalism or contribute to any discussions such as the Yew Grove. Also per Azaz, I find "if he was given the right tools, he would be a God, and the Wiki would become the best place for Runescape information" a bit disturbing. I find it hard to believe that someone that wasn't even sure about how an RfA works would be a "God" and make this wiki "the best". Above all, you need administrative and experience and community involvement. Revert vandalism and report it to the CVU, contribute to the Yew Grove and other community discussions, and stick around for awhile. Andrew talk 03:07, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Advertisement