I've decided to nominate Iiii I I I for admin rights because I think he is a loyal editor of this wiki since December 13, 2008. He is always seen fighting Vandalism in the Special:RecentChanges page, adding useful information to many articles, also applying transparency and helping the image maintenance project. I also think that he is mature enough and will not abuse his powers while being an admin. Iiii I I I is also very kind with other users and helps and WILL try to help anyone if asked, one example of this is that he takes signature requests by other users as you can see in his contributions. He can handle stressful situations very well as he has proven several times in the Cryptic Clue Fest article, he also welcomes users. I offer him my Great Support and I wish him good luck with this nomination! Gragon 126 Talk 01:31, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
I, Iiii I I I, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed,01:40, December 2, 2009 (UTC).
Questions for the nominee
1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
I would warn or block users/IPs if needed, watch the Administrator requests page, the Counter Vandalism Unit page, and basically keep doing what I've been doing so far.
2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?
My best contributions are probably images that I have uploaded. I strangely like to remove shadows from inventory images and add transparency to other images. Also, a few images I've uploaded have been featured.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I have been in a small conflict with Tehnoobshow101 over a few of the Surge spell animations here. I asked Calebchiam for help, and he resolved the problem. I don't think I've been in any major conflicts with other users, as I only discovered the Recent Changes page about three months ago and started editing more.
I've also been blocked once for a day because of this. I don't remember why or how I did that, since the main page is protected, but I won't do it again.
Additional questions (asked by the community if necessary)
Neutral - I commonly see Iiiii I I I on the recent changes, reverting vandalism, placing notices on their talk pages. He also is active image contributor. The thing that makes me neutral is that very few Yew Grove posts are shown. I would like to see some more forum posts. So, if you improve on your Forum posts, I can gladly support in the future. ~MuzTalk 02:05, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Approve most heartily this nomination for administrative tools - Does an insane amount of anti-vandal work, does lots of image work that requires moving and deleting images, and is a nice guy who rarely pistol whips anybody. Its true that he doesn't post often on the yew groves, but he'd get too much use out of the admin tools to not give them to him for that reason alone.Support - Per a certain Psycho above. Almost every time I'm on the Wiki, I see him making some edit to some page in the recent changes box. He's well deserving of it. Give 'em to him, I say. -- 02:42, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - You aren't an admin already? I wouldn't have known that based on the work you've done to fight vandalism and working on the really tough parts of connecting everything on the wiki. Seriously, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't trust this user with these tools related to adminship, and it is always useful to have another admin to help out along the way. With how heated some of the Yew Grove discussions have been lately, it might not be a bad idea to have somebody who may be "neutral" to the discussion to at least be capable of stepping in to help moderate... so I don't consider an absence from the Yew Grove as necessarily a negative issue. His work elsewhere speaks for itself. --Robert Horning 07:11, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Seriously, only 16 forum edits? Some great anti-vandal work and welcoming users, but you've got to be more active in discussions. Can't think of anything 'bad' about any of your contribs, other than the lack of forum edits. You have definitely proven yourself 'worthy' of admin tools and capable of using them right. Oil4 Talk 09:19, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - I think that he has done a great amount of community stuff. While he doesn't live in Yew Grove like some people, he is active in other areas which are important like article of the month, votes for deletion and featured image. I was actually considering nominating you yesterday Iiii I I I and even pressed create new section on you talk page, yet I decided against it because of all the bad judgements that I have made recently. Evil Yanks talk 09:54, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Also, how the hell did you edit the main page... Evil Yanks talk 09:58, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support I am on quite a bit when he is on, and he beats me to most vandalism. The only issue I have is that sometimes he does not give the ip wikian some slack before calling it vandalism. However, this issue should not prevent him from being an admin, just something to be more conscious of when reverting vandalism Atlandy 15:58, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support- You even came up last week or so as a soon to be candidate, but no one knew how to say your name >.> Seriously though, although you don't have to always warn vandals first, it is often enough to keep some one from being a repeat offender. Something to keep in mind as you prepare to press that block button. G'luck.--Degenret01 16:18, December 2, 2009 (UTC)Support - Would make a swell addition.
Support - Per all. No reason we can't trust him with the tools. @Gaz#7521 18:19, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per all.19:30, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - He's ready. Plus, the 10,251 edits gives a hint!19:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Well of course, we might as well call him Mr. 10,000-Edits-In-Three-Months-Along-With-Reverting-Vandalism-Creating-Epic-Images-And-Other-Miscellaneous-Edits! fail, I know21:31, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - He reminds me of good old times when I was a rollbacker. One of the best antivandals I've ever seen. I would love to see more community discussion participation, but I have no doubt that you will make an exceptional sysop. Andrew talk 21:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Allowing administrative tools would allow the betterment of the Wiki Project, allowing for another that is heavily involved with files to move/clear file history/end revert wars. Not only does the file edits speak for themselves, but it also shows a dedication alongside one of our top editors. I have a question to ponder though. I will post it later regarding file names. Ryan PM 22:15, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Support - 10,000 edits in 3 months? Thats amazing.--Cheers,01:47, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- since December 13, 2008 - That's a year, not 3 months. But it's still a lot. Oil4 Talk 18:52, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Oli, the point was that he's made 10,000 edits in the past three months. Not in his whole time being here. From August-December, 3-4 months, he's made at least 10,000 edits. Before that he'd not done much. The point is that 10,000 edits over the course of 3-4 months is p00nage
Support~! In fact, I was recently thinking about nominating him (her?) for Adminship. I support because I ALWAYS see you reverting vandalism. Gone. 19:54, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
Comment - "I, Iiii I I I, accept..." - lol. Gone. 19:55, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Lol, looks weird Gragon 126 Talk 01:06, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
- 011011000110111101101100 -- 02:44, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per everyone01:09, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per all.
Support - I was the one who suggested that he would be a soon-to-be candidate. Pretty much every time I'm on, he's on. I haven't done any anti-vandal work in forever because this user is a beast at it. However, be careful when blocking someone... I hope you remember that little incident. 21:05, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
SUPPPPPPPPPPORT - Why the hell wasn't I informed of this page earlier. To show how active this robot is, randomly select 5 to 10 articles on the RSW. Now look at the bottom, and see who last edited it. Yeah, the robot. --Fruit.Smoothie 02:15, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
- While Yew Grove contributions are important, I trust that Iiii will be more active on the Yew Grove from this time forward. We do not need absolute perfection in our admins. Iiii has been acting as an administrator already warning vandals and other related things, and making him an admin will make the wiki much more efficient. Lack of Yew Grove contributions should not stop this. 23:48, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Something called sarcasm. I'm a major in Physc. and I can detect subtle hints of idiosyncratic personalities. Robot never tends to speak or communicate, and his vocabulary/wording is different. JK, yeah, was pretty obvious they're the same people. But it's kinda weird how Pyscho uses IIIIII to speak to himself.... -_- --Fruit.Smoothie 05:20, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
Support - Per all above. Not Lvl 3 03:28, December 15, 2009 (UTC)