FANDOM


Muzzy34

Muzzy34 TalkContribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk editsEdit count

Muzzy has been around since early February and for as long as I can remember he has been an excellent anti vandal and also regularly participates in community discussions. He has shown that he is able to assume good faith and I have never seen him lose his temper. This is exactly what I want to see in a sysop so I hereby nominate Muzzy34 for adminship. Andrew talk 14:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I, Muzzy34, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realize that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realize that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, ~MuzTalk 14:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC).

Questions for the nominee

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in? - I plan to take a main stand against vandals and their nasty works on the information of the wiki. Many times have I seen a persistent vandal on the wiki and could only report them, hoping that an admin can block them shortly. With the ability to block vandals as they work, the wiki can remain a calmer, more informational, place. Also, I can easily delete images and pages that either have no content to them, are spam, or have been replaced by a newer version.

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why? - I feel that my best contributions to this wiki have been in the anti-vandal work. But, also I have done rewrites and cleanup to edits that were made by others, so that the information is clear and easy to understand.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? - I don't believe that I have been in any major conflicts with other editors, but I have been in a small conflict before with Soldier, I was recently new to rollback, only having it for about a week or so. I reported everything to the CVU, and then got told that I should assume good faith, which I had tried to make one of my top priorities to improve on.

Additional questions (asked by the community if necessary)

Discussion

Support - as nominator. Andrew talk 14:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Huge Support - Muzzy has been a very good editer in the past months. His images are always nice and his reverting vandalism is wonderful. What makes me support also is your conflict enemy is doing a nomination. Just improve the assume good faith bit and you'll make a perfect admin. Runecrafting-icon Mo 55 55 Talk|Sign 16:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Huge support - Per Soldier. Quest point cape Juliusc01Talk Click here if you think this wiki is obsessed with bunniesSergeant icon 17:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - per all. Rollback crown Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 17:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Good amount of edits, participates in community discussions, and is always calm. You definitely have some room to improve, but who doesn't? Good luck!  Tien  17:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Very very weak support - Yes, good amounts of edits and anti-vandal work, but I think you could participate more in community discussions, and you haven't been here all that long.--Joe Click Here for Awesomeness18:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per Kalindrum (Mo 55 55) and Soldier (Andrew). Good work Muzzy. =) ~ Fire Surge icon Sentry Telos Talk  18:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per Soldier http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/3921/thehimmemote.pngGone. 19:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - About time someone nominated him, hehe. He does a lot to keep the wikia clean.=DSanta hat Powers38 おはようヾ(´・ω・`) 02:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - This guy was cool enough to revert those censored by the thought police edits of that complete censored by the thought police 206.213.191.133, and obviously contributes a lot to the wiki. However, I don't see you in the cc that much. Dragon claw Zezzima Talk Edit # SkillsFile:Turmoil.gif|Yay turmoil! 03:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

No need to be rude or offensive, Zezzima. We have RS:UTP for a reason. By the way, I see him in the clan chat a lot so perhaps you guys just aren't on at the same times. Andrew talk 03:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
If you think that being in the clan chat matters, then you should not be here casting your thoughts. It is totally irrelevant to Muzzy undertanding the use of sysop tools.--Degenret01 12:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
You may read RuneScape:Administrators to get a better idea of what is a sysop.--Degenret01 12:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Another one I was thinking of nominating myself. Great anti-vandal. Sysop crown Hurston (T # C) 12:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support His contribs look good, I see good work from him, seems to understand things pretty well.--Degenret01 12:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - I've found the above mentioned to be true too. C.ChiamTalk 04:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per all. Weird gloop @Gaz#7521 15:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Muzzy is a very kind user, great anti-vandal work, very deserving. Statistics Lvl 3 skils3 Friends Talk~ Holiday Signup ~Hiscores 18:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - Per everyone -- 14:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Support and request for early closure - Well, it's obvious this RFA is going to succeed, so why not close it early? Btw, per all. -- 06:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC
I don't know yet, usually what happened with previous RfA's that were in a case like this (An example is Tienjt0's adminship), the active bureaucrat placed a notice of intent and added it into the sitenotice. So I don't think that it could be requested for early closure until the notice is put up. ~MuzTalk 12:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Four or five days is way to early. Give it at least ten. Even Bonzii with 30 plus supports and zero oppose waited 10+days. Give the people who only log on weekly a chance to pop in.--Degenret01 13:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Actually I kinda agree. I've been seeing more and more RfA's being closed quite early. Soon, RfA's might run for a week only. o.O Santa hat Powers38 おはようヾ(´・ω・`) 13:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Aye, Muzzy is a great candidate and will do well as an admin when this RfA is over. However I am hesitant to close any further RfAs early do to the possible future reprocussions (meaning you won't see any future early closures from me). Remember patience is a virtue.Wink -- 15:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
I understand. I was just replying to Supirion's comment about it being closed. And if it gets into the habit of closing RfA's earlier than the 14 days it takes, then everyone would want theirs to be closed earlier on. I completely understand. ~MuzTalk 19:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Support - No reason for why not. Weird gloop @Gaz#7521 10:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, but you already voted up above. ~MuzTalk 13:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Rofl, I'm an idoit. Weird gloop @Gaz#7521 14:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Well...You misspelled "Idiot"--Santa hat Powers38 おはようヾ(´・ω・`) 14:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I think he did that just to somewhat show that he thinks he is. Don't worry, we make mistakes. ~MuzTalk 14:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Case and point (it wasn't on purpose... or was it?) Lol Weird gloop @Gaz#7521 14:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Support Per all. Horsehead Talk 12:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Closed - Muzzy34 is now a sysop.-- 23:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.