RuneScape:Requests for adminship/Zombie Maces

Zombie Maces

Zombie Maces ^{Talk • Contribs • Last 20 Forum - Main - User talk edits • Edit count}

I think that ii woud make a good admin.

I, Zombie Maces, accept this nomination for adminship. I have read the policies concerning administrators. I realise that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my powers because I realise that this is a serious offence and if the community finds that I have done so, my powers will be revoked and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, Zombie Maces 22:26, August 7, 2010 (UTC).

Questions for the nominee

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
blocking vandals and spammers

2. What are your best contributions to the RuneScape Wiki, and why?
I made a article

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
No

Discussion

Strong Oppose = From the page history it looks like you made it yourself. Self Nominating is not my thing. Also the edit count is very low. Just on my opinion it looks suspicious to self nominate on a new user all of a sudden.

1. REDIRECT User:Coaster4321/Sig 22:46, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - You only have 25 edits... at time of posting User:TyA/sig 22:27, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - You have only 25 edits as stated above, you're relatively new, and you failed to even think of a simple answer for your adminship questions. Just keep on editing, find advice stated on other RfAs, and someday, you may become an admin. ~Muz^Talk 22:29, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose Not yet. You have no experience on this wiki Atlandy 22:31, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Strong oppose - You must have huge experience within the wiki to actually consider a RfA... RS:SNOW please guys? Rhys ^Talk 22:34, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Ok I answerd the questions Zombie Maces 22:32, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - Only 25 edits? You've no need for administrator tools at this time. Sysop tools are only for those who really need it, and have alot of experience in using the wiki.--Cheers, Yoda 22:36, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - You barely have any edits and you don't have much experience here. Saradomin^{Sign Me!} 22:38, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - While I appreciate your vigor, I have to oppose. Users with a hundred times your edit count have seen their RfAs not go through due to inexperience. I realize that RfAs shouldn't necessarily be closed because of RS:SNOW, but this really doesn't even have a snowball's chance in hell of passing. Note that editcount doesn't guarantee adminship, but you should have a substantial number of edits before trying for this. Good luck in the future. ʞooɔ 22:38, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - In your time of two months of editing, you have made contributions to only three articles, have made only 29 edits to the entire wiki, and have participated in no community discussions. Although your editing seems to be fine so far, you have not been here quite long enough to fully understand the editing and community policies of this wiki. I recommend trying once you get to at least 500 edits. User:C Teng/sig 22:40, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - I am aware that these requests should stay open for two weeks, though several users have mentioned the possibility of RS:SNOW being used. I am not saying this should be closed instantly, though unless anyone objects, I would like to close this earlier than the standard request. User:Stelercus/Signature 22:47, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Why does nobody like me? Zombie Maces 22:50, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

It's not because we don't like you, your just not ready for admin tools. User:TyA/sig 22:51, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Why cant you trust me to ban vandals and spammers? Zombie Maces 22:52, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

There's more to it than that. So much I don't even know where to begin. You're enthusiastic, and that's a start, but you don't have the knowledge or experience to handle the tools at this time. User:Stelercus/Signature 22:54, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

*TRIPLE EDIT CONFLICT* No one said they didn't like you... We just said that you don't have enough experience and you are not suited to the task of being an sysop... We also never said we did not trust you... Rhys ^Talk 22:57, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well, we kind of did... that's the reason we're opposing. User:C Teng/sig 22:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Opposing an RFA ≠ saying you don't like the candidate. User:Stelercus/Signature 23:06, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

I don't dislike him (or her), I mean I'm opposing because I don't trust him. User:C Teng/sig 23:26, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Learn when you guys are being trolled lololol. Composite 4

We get a lot of these. User:C Teng/sig 22:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

RS:UTP Rhys ^Talk 23:04, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

You must be new. We sure get a lot of these when people just signed up and does RfA already. Powers38 ^おはようヾ(´･ω･｀) 23:05, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Hey bro, perhaps you should look at past RfAs, some of the most recent ones seen here. That should give you a good idea of what to expect in a candidate, and you can try for that. User:Haloolah123/Sig 23:03, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Not Yet - Feel free to request this again after we all know you, and trust you. I'd give it a few thousand edits before your next request.

1. REDIRECT User:C886553/sig 23:22, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

Strong oppose - Per all. 222 ^talk 00:45, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - After vandalism to this page by the candidate and no support, Zombie Maces will not become an administrator at this time. ʞooɔ 01:28, August 8, 2010 (UTC)