Battle for the Stone of Jas
This page is unnecessary, there was no battle for this page to be continue as the only "battle" was within the the final stage, Seren, Zaros, vs Sliske, us vs his wights and him later on This page counts our fight with Nomad in the beginning, but it wasn't a battle, it was a two person fight. This page really doesn't need to be up, as the Sixth Age already gives us a small information about it. It is a waste of space.
Delete - As nominator 
Adventurerrr Talk 
Keep, possibly rename - It details a significant event in the Sixth Age. And yer logic can easily be applied to any page regarding a significant battle - the Assassination of Guthix page, fer example, contains the fight between the player and Kree'arra (a 2-person fight, which was part of the larger battle), and can easily be covered by Sixth Age. Is it a waste of space? Template:Signatures/Ciphrius Kane 14:27, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
Keep - We need that kind of information spread across multiple pages to keep the readers entertained on various pages. You can rewrite or add information, there's no need to delete, really, as you said, Sixth Age give us a small information, not all of it. Maximus Gugu of Armadyl
: Your Friendly Neighborhood Artist. 15:34, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
Keep - I agree with Ciph and Maxi. The Sixth Age page gives very little information about it. This expansion on the page makes it not a waste of space. Maybe the page is a stub. But that just means we should work to build the page up and not just delete it. User:Zafryna/Signature 15:45, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
Keep - Per others above. Salix of Prifddinas (Talk) 15:51, February 22, 2018 (UTC)
Keep - A 2 person fight qualifies as a battle in my opinion. Seeing as how the Sixth Age article only gives the reader a small amount of information about the subject; this article should definitely stay as the source for more in-depth information. I also feel that granularity applies here as this event is indeed a notable one. 
MAGE-KIL-R 
00:39, February 23, 2018 (UTC)