Category:NPCs with multiple Examine options
I just don't see the point of this. Categories are supposed to make finding related things easy (like browsing stuff related to Mahjarrat, dragon weaponry, things that give prayer XP, images of caeks or goblins) - I hardly see how anything in this category is related to something else in it. Basically, it's useless. Oh, and horribly incomplete/obsolete. I say we kill it.
Speedy kill - As, uh, something. 
Fswe1 
09:56, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
Oppose - Just add in any NPCs that aren't listed. It's a perfectly legitimate category. User:Real Not Pure/Signature 21:24, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
- But what's the point of listing NPCs with multiple examines? There's no benefit at all. Fswe1 05:55, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- If that's your only reason, this won't pass. We don't need another "why?" v. "why not?" argument. MolMan 13:51, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- It's useless. We might as well create Category:NPCs with black moustaches or Category:NPCs that switch locations if this fails. Fswe1 13:55, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Do it! #YOLO :P --Jlun2 (talk) 15:55, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- #YOEO - You only edit once. http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/Blaze_fire.pnghttp://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/12.png 07:14, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
- This site is not a guide and categories are not for the sole purpose of finding gear or specific lores. This is an encyclopaedia and it is notable that the NPCs in that category have multiple examines, as that is not something all NPCs have and so it is "unique" <!-in a loose sense, not the dictionary definition--> to those pages. Category:NPCs that switch locations would actually make a good category by the way. User:Real Not Pure/Signature 15:11, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Do it! #YOLO :P --Jlun2 (talk) 15:55, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- It's useless. We might as well create Category:NPCs with black moustaches or Category:NPCs that switch locations if this fails.
- If that's your only reason, this won't pass. We don't need another "why?" v. "why not?" argument. MolMan 13:51, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
Some pages that need the category - Not hard to find. MolMan 21:36, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
Closed - No consensus to delete. Suppa chuppa Talk 14:05, July 13, 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.