No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::I have now rewritten it. Check it out. '''I still say keep'''.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 23:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
::I have now rewritten it. Check it out. '''I still say keep'''.--[[User:Richard1990|Richard]] 23:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
'''keep''' Much nicer now that it is rewritten. Definite keep. --[[user:megalodon99|megalodon99]] |
'''keep''' Much nicer now that it is rewritten. Definite keep. --[[user:megalodon99|megalodon99]] |
||
| + | |||
| − | Ooooh pretty! I say '''keep'''--[[User:Curmudgeony|Curmudgeony]] 01:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC) |
+ | Ooooh pretty! :) I say '''keep'''--[[User:Curmudgeony|Curmudgeony]] 01:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:11, 2 August 2006
Goblin (2)
We don't have an article on goblins yet, but frankly Goblin (2) sucks and is useless as a redirect. Hyenaste 20:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, delete, I'm not a fan of 'stub only' articles either, i'd prefer them as Wanted pages or not there at all, or they tend to get lost. --Eucarya 00:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - why a Goblin 2 article? Shadowdancer 01:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Ultra mega stong delete Re write it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.254.64.16 (talk).
- Keep. I'll rewrite right now. Lol, I like what it was.--Richard 22:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- I have now rewritten it. Check it out. I still say keep.--Richard 23:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
keep Much nicer now that it is rewritten. Definite keep. --megalodon99
Ooooh pretty! :) I say keep--Curmudgeony 01:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)