m (→Strategies 2) Tag: sourceedit |
m (Protected "RuneScape:Requests for merging/Automaton Guardian/Strategies 2": Archive ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Rfm top|archive=}} |
+ | {{Rfm top|archive=true|Merge}} |
===[[Automaton Guardian/Strategies]]=== |
===[[Automaton Guardian/Strategies]]=== |
||
:''[[RuneScape:Requests for merging/Automaton Guardian/Strategies|Previous discussion]]'' |
:''[[RuneScape:Requests for merging/Automaton Guardian/Strategies|Previous discussion]]'' |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Merge''' - As nominator {{Signatures/Temujin96}} 11:20, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
'''Merge''' - As nominator {{Signatures/Temujin96}} 11:20, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | '''Sure''' - Why not? {{Signatures/Salix of Prifddinas}} 15:08, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Support''' - {{Signatures/Powers38}} 16:18, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Support''' - {{User:TyA/sig}} 16:22, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Merge''' - strategies are similar and a combined page is more useful for helping players choose which type to kill, e.g. in a slayer task. {{Signatures/IsobelJ}} 16:24, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Do it. No, like really. Don't wait''' - Being such a minor thing (meaning a subpage not a main page) there is no need for this request, you can just go ahead and do it. [[User:Degenret01|Degenret01]] ([[User talk:Degenret01|talk]]) 16:28, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | :I'd link to Be Bold and UCS but saying it should be enough.[[User:Degenret01|Degenret01]] ([[User talk:Degenret01|talk]]) 16:29, April 5, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | :There was a [[RuneScape:Requests for merging/Automaton Guardian/Strategies|previous discussion with no consensus]]. Besides, we've used [[RS:RFD]] when getting rid of other strategy pages. {{Signatures/Temujin96}} 07:09, April 6, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::Yea, but there wasn't any opposition either. If you want to wait, wait. [[User:Degenret01|Degenret01]] ([[User talk:Degenret01|talk]]) 17:25, April 6, 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | <nowiki>{{Closure|Discussion is done. {{Signatures/Temujin96}} 15:34, April 10, 2017 (UTC)}}</nowiki> |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Closed''' - Article will be merged. {{Signatures/Liquidhelium}} 17:30, April 11, 2017 (UTC) |
||
<!-------- All posts must be made above this line --------> |
<!-------- All posts must be made above this line --------> |
||
{{Rfm bottom}} |
{{Rfm bottom}} |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 11 April 2017
Automaton Guardian/Strategies
Automaton Guardians don't need their own strategy page. It'd be no trouble to include them in Automaton/Strategies – I'm happy to do that myself.
Merge - As nominator Temujin 11:20, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Sure - Why not? Salix of Prifddinas (Talk) 15:08, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Support - Powers38 おはようヾ(´・ω・`) 16:18, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Support - User:TyA/sig 16:22, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Merge - strategies are similar and a combined page is more useful for helping players choose which type to kill, e.g. in a slayer task. IsobelJ 16:24, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Do it. No, like really. Don't wait - Being such a minor thing (meaning a subpage not a main page) there is no need for this request, you can just go ahead and do it. Degenret01 (talk) 16:28, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
- I'd link to Be Bold and UCS but saying it should be enough.Degenret01 (talk) 16:29, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
- There was a previous discussion with no consensus. Besides, we've used RS:RFD when getting rid of other strategy pages. Temujin 07:09, April 6, 2017 (UTC)
- Yea, but there wasn't any opposition either. If you want to wait, wait. Degenret01 (talk) 17:25, April 6, 2017 (UTC)
{{Closure|Discussion is done. {{Signatures/Temujin96}} 15:34, April 10, 2017 (UTC)}}
Closed - Article will be merged. --LiquidTalk 17:30, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.