Automaton Guardian/Strategies
Automaton Guardians don't need their own strategy page. It'd be no trouble to include them in Automaton/Strategies – I'm happy to do that myself.
Merge - As nominator Temujin 11:20, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Sure - Why not? Salix of Prifddinas (Talk) 15:08, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Support - Powers38 おはようヾ(´・ω・`) 16:18, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Support - User:TyA/sig 16:22, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Merge - strategies are similar and a combined page is more useful for helping players choose which type to kill, e.g. in a slayer task. IsobelJ 16:24, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
Do it. No, like really. Don't wait - Being such a minor thing (meaning a subpage not a main page) there is no need for this request, you can just go ahead and do it. Degenret01 (talk) 16:28, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
- I'd link to Be Bold and UCS but saying it should be enough.Degenret01 (talk) 16:29, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
- There was a previous discussion with no consensus. Besides, we've used RS:RFD when getting rid of other strategy pages. Temujin 07:09, April 6, 2017 (UTC)
- Yea, but there wasn't any opposition either. If you want to wait, wait. Degenret01 (talk) 17:25, April 6, 2017 (UTC)
{{Closure|Discussion is done. {{Signatures/Temujin96}} 15:34, April 10, 2017 (UTC)}}
Closed - Article will be merged. --LiquidTalk 17:30, April 11, 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.