RuneScape:Requests for splitting/Azzanadra 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed splitting of the article below. Please do not modify it. The result was Keep merged.

Azzanadra

Following Forum:Revisiting NPC granularity - alter egos

First RfS: RuneScape:Requests for splitting/Azzanadra

Azzanadra is actually a weird case. At the beginning of The Temple at Senntisten, he disguises himself as Nabanik, but it's revealed quite quickly that he is actually a mahjarrat. Nabanik, however, might constitute enough significance to deserve a split. Besides his major role as an archaeologist in the quest (though debatable how much we can attribute this to the mahjarrat), he has also appeared in Postbag from the Hedge 41 and Postbag from the Hedge 42.

Neutral - Been having second thoughts, but it still deserves discussion. MolMan 11:43, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - Nabanik is revealed to be Azzanadra in his first dialogue box, and the NPC is renamed "Azzanadra" as soon as you enter the temple. Splitting would be kind of pointless since the "Azzanadra" NPC who is identical to Dr Nabanik in all but name continues to appear throughout The Temple at Senntisten and Ritual of the Mahjarrat, plus post-quest stuff for other quests, meaning all of the information on the Nabanik NPC would be duplicated on Azzanadra's page anyway. Wahisietel (Talk) 12:23, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - I agree with Battleben . . . _Yours, Enquidou^Talk . . 12:45, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - In this case, Nabanik and Azzy are functionally identical after approximately six seconds. Fsw e1 20:06, April 23, 2016 (UTC)

Closed - Dr. Nabanik will not be split off. --Liquid^Talk 20:33, May 4, 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.