RuneScape:Requests for splitting/Titles

Titles

Having a single page as the one and only source of information on all titles was fine when it was made. Back then, there was only a handful of titles and the only difference between them was how much Xuan wanted you to pay for them. But by now, there are well over a hundred different titles, many of which are obtained in vastly different ways. Really, the Gamebreaker, Sir / Dame and the Survivor have about as much in common as Golden scythe, Exquisite spear and Dominion sword do.

So I say we go full RS:G on this page. Titles can still stay, but explaining titles in general (similar to Weapon), rather than being a list of titles described in greatly varying levels of detail.

Split - As nominator. User:I Am Me/Signatures 05:45, October 19, 2016 (UTC) Split - I think so too, the page is rather extensive and long now. We could make subpages I guess for different categories? ^Amo_Vos 07:46, October 19, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - I actually like the whole page with every title in the game. Helps me find certain titles that are a specific colour, and it probably even helps Jagex know what titles they've already released in the game. I don't think it's too big right now. I'm not sure about applying RS:G here... lots of titles are too similar with already-existing pages so it'll just be a little messy adding to every page "x refers to blah, for the title see y". Haidro ^(talk) 06:28, October 20, 2016 (UTC)

I'm not saying we can't have a list of titles. But having Capes doesn't stop us from having Blue cape or Ardougne cloak 4, so why should Titles (or a new List of Titles page for that matter) prevent us from having The Distracted or Lorehound?

As for your second point, don't we do that already? User:I Am Me/Signatures 15:56, October 20, 2016 (UTC)

Capes are different since they're actual different items. If we have individual titles they'd be so empty and repetitive (especially for titles in the same tables on Titles). Also what's the use of a List of Titles page, isn't that what we already have?

Finally, we do that already, but in my opinion it gets rather messy. Haidro ^(talk) 13:11, October 21, 2016 (UTC)

Comment - We could rewrite titles to make a list of it like Music/track list and perhaps make seperate articles for titles like music tracks? Salix of Prifddinas ^(Talk) 09:08, October 21, 2016 (UTC)

Split into subpages - I'd suggest keeping the page as is but replacing the sections that actually list the titles with subpages onto which we just copy-paste the lists. That way we still have a complete list of titles but a less huge article, at the cost of a few extra clicks. Fswe1 16:33, October 22, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - While it's long, it's well categorized and easy to navigate by using the table of contents. We could add collapsible tables if you want to reduce the raw pagelength for visitors, but I'm not sure that's necessary at all. Amascut ^{Ia Morte} 02:26, November 5, 2016 (UTC)