I tried to address the neutral point of view issue. Lets try not to recommend anything over any other thing (shark over lobster, e.g.) I prefer lobsters for training :)--Burnticej 04:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Each food having its own page
I strongly agree with the idea of having one page for each food... and a master chart in the cooking page--BURNTICEJ 03:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't really think the different foods are needed... 16pxDreadnoughttalk 18:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I've added the charts of the different foods although it is not complete...
If you have to make a box for every food in the game this page is going to be huge. --Wowbagger421 01:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
i am aware of that and i counted only 57 player made foods so it wont be too many pages. I think it will only take me 2 days and a lot of my free time. lol......
I don't think you should continue. 13:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC) People's computer will be slow.
Why don't you just make a chart or table?
- I disagree. The short table here is quite helpful for quick comparison of common choices, and there's no need to force people to look through the whole table on another page. 126.96.36.199 20:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I mean, there's lots of tables out there, why not use one here? Like columns picture, name, cook lvl, hp, bites, cook xp, notes, where to get, etc. Mathwhiz90601 04:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
I think a list of commonly used foods (top 10 or 20 foods) would be useful. People can refer to the cooking page if they want a list of all cookable foods. And, yes I agree with comment that a table would be much better. Amaurice talk 11:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Which template is suppose to be used for food? Item or food? I've seen both used on different pages and both seem to work in conjunction with the cooking chart. Carbonite 0