RuneScape Wiki
(→‎AoG campaign canon: new section)
Line 32: Line 32:
   
 
the equipment section is weird, first it talks about mage 3rd age armor, range 3rd age armor, and melee 3rd age armor, then it seems to be talking about eather bandos, 3rd age or armadyl, (assuming armadyl can be smithed). then it says it was called 3rd age armor, and yet it has a picture of bandos armor. isnt this a bit confusing?
 
the equipment section is weird, first it talks about mage 3rd age armor, range 3rd age armor, and melee 3rd age armor, then it seems to be talking about eather bandos, 3rd age or armadyl, (assuming armadyl can be smithed). then it says it was called 3rd age armor, and yet it has a picture of bandos armor. isnt this a bit confusing?
  +
  +
== AoG campaign canon ==
  +
  +
According to the new Funorb Q&A with Mod Korpz, the Armies of Gielinor campaign is canon information about the Godwars. http://services.funorb.com/m=forum_fo/l=0/forums.ws?0,1,106,57343,goto,4 It's my question. <b><i><font style="background:cyan"><span style= "Border:1px solid black">[[Image:Armadylhelmet.png‎|Armadyl Helm‎]][[User:Klay king61|<font color="black">Long Live Armadyl</font>]][[Image:Armadylhelmet.png‎|Armadyl Helm‎]]</span></font></i></b> 21:51, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:51, 18 February 2010

Wow, i've never even heard of this, cool! Dreadnought 23:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Well now you have. Im doing some very hard research to get more details on the wars of this time. --Whiplash 23:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Hm...What category would this article go in? JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 06:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

More of its own category I think. --Whiplash 22:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Seven Warriors/ Barrow Brothers

The Barrow Brothers are not the same as the Seven Warriors. The Seven Warriors held back the forces of Lord Drakan, with Ivandis being the sole survivor while the Barrow Brothers invaded Morytania after that event. Chaoticar 21:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The Seven Warriors existed during the Fourth Age, so they don't need to be mentioned in this article. The article on the Fourth Age, though, could use some info on them. Morian Smith 21:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

shoulded the dragon dagger

be added in the third age article becuase the Revenants drop them

24.205.242.48 04:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Use info

well this is a nice helpguide and tell people wat is there and wats happening i want to ask the owner of the website could i copy the article to my runescape helping site please if you alow me i would be very greate full--81.98.1.190 (talk)

I've responded on the user's talk page.--Richard 19:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

God Wars or Third Age?

The Game Guide refers to it as the Third Age [1], so shouldn't that be the appropriate title for this article? Penguin maskChewy (Talk) 03:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree that third age is the better name. Not only because it the God Wars is an unofficial names that NPC's use (i think), it goes with the current fashion of age naming (we call it the fifth age, not the age of humans) Unicorn horn dust Evil Yanks talk 09:39, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Answer

The Third Age and God Wars are more or less the same, just that the whole Third Age was taken up by the War so there's not much point in having two articles when the only thing that happened during the Age was the God Wars.

3rd age armour

the equipment section is weird, first it talks about mage 3rd age armor, range 3rd age armor, and melee 3rd age armor, then it seems to be talking about eather bandos, 3rd age or armadyl, (assuming armadyl can be smithed). then it says it was called 3rd age armor, and yet it has a picture of bandos armor. isnt this a bit confusing?

AoG campaign canon

According to the new Funorb Q&A with Mod Korpz, the Armies of Gielinor campaign is canon information about the Godwars. http://services.funorb.com/m=forum_fo/l=0/forums.ws?0,1,106,57343,goto,4 It's my question. Armadyl Helm‎Long Live ArmadylArmadyl Helm‎ 21:51, February 18, 2010 (UTC)