danyor or Draynor?
In the see also section, there was the word "danyor" without a link. I've changed it to "Draynor," because that's what it seems to be. I'm using my IP for this change, because I don't have an account. I stated that because I don't want to give my IP out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.108.40.206 (talk).
So it is the same old, again. I make an edit, and it should be changed (and often removed) to fit with the other editor's taste (which I have no idea who they are). There is difference between may and should. May imply you have a choice of how many seeds you can plant. This is not true. You are forced to use 3 seeds, or there will be no planting. Please change it to something more clear and true. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.127.116.11 (talk).
- Well, as no one is forcing you to plant potato seeds (before you say "well, they're the lowest level seed, there are other ways of getting xp), you "may" choose to plant them. That is the phrasing I was going for. 18:19, May 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Although, as this does seem to bother you, I changed the "may" in the second sentence to "can", changed the "can" in the third sentence to "may", and the "may" in the third sentence to "might". 18:21, May 19, 2014 (UTC)
Which is why I worded it as *Three potato seeds are needed, etc*..Implies it have to be 3, should you wish to plant it. Now this is a contribution I have made, and while your edit can arguibly be correct; I believe it is fairer and more respectful to keep the original addition if it is also correct. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) on 18:26, May 19, 2014 (UTC).
*Three seeds at a time can be planted*. It can give a false idea that one can plant in bulk if they wanted to, but it doesn't deny the fact that what's under 3 seeds will be rejected. See why *need* is a clearer wording? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) on 18:29, May 19, 2014 (UTC).
- I think Ansela's main intention with her edit was simply to work the information into the start of the introduction, so I think her follow-up edit was fair enough. However, I do agree that "can" is a little ambiguous as it could be interpreted as "up to 3 seeds". I have changed this so hopefully it is a little firmer; can't imagine doing so will offend anyone. --Henneyj 18:44, May 19, 2014 (UTC)
Just ROFL. I look back at this talk page, and AnselaJonla have changed my OWN words, so it doesn't harm her-already-fractured ego. What I originally said, was something like: I make an edit, and it gets changed (and often removed), etc.....when I came back days later. It is now: I make an edit, and it should be changed (and often removed). I like the *should* addition. You really is great in confusing ego-defending with intilligence. Get over yourself. Also, if you remove what I added; you will just prove my point further. For the rest: You have a power-hungrey fellow that puts their personal issues in the way when they make decisions here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) on 06:45, May 26, 2014 (UTC).