Charm Log Denial[]
I'm trying to fill in my charm drop information that I got today from killing rorariuses, but it won't let me. The script thinks I'm vandalizing the data, because my numbers are quite off (especially gold charms), however I am 100% sure I am correct. I didn't kill anything else than them and I had a imp in my inventory to grab all charms. I also checked my experience from before and after to double check if my killcount was correct.
Here's my data in case anyone else can add it:
| kills | gold | green | crimson | blue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 209 | 122 (58.37%) | 37 (17.70%) | 2 (0.96%) | 3 (1.44%) |
| 532 | 264 (49.62%) | 61 (11.45%) | 2 (0.38%) | 8 (1.50%) |
| 459 | 227 (49.46%) | 47 (10.24%) | 6 (1.31%) | 4 (0.87%) |
~Broxzier~ (Talk) 16:55, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
- That's a 78% charm drop rate overall, compared to the current 40-43%. It's almost double the expected rate. However, looking through the Charm abuse logs there is another Rorarius entry that has been blocked from 3 days ago with somewhat similar results. Perhaps there's been some modification of charm drop rates. The only issue with me adding it in is that I believe the bot that merges the individual logs into the main log has some level of abuse filtering itself. It might get filtered out during merging. User:Cqm/Signature
- Someone, or a few someones, could kill a few hundred to a thousand rorarii to restart the log, if their charm rates match Brox'?
AnselaJonla 
17:16, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
- I'll redo this tonight, and, perhaps, tomorrow again. I'll update the table above with new rows of data. ~Broxzier~ (Talk) 18:13, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Someone, or a few someones, could kill a few hundred to a thousand rorarii to restart the log, if their charm rates match Brox'?
Maging[]
Is maging a good idea instead of using range? Puretppc (talk) 04:02, October 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Highly unlikely. The ascension members are meant to be a range slayer dungeon, their defence to melee and magic is way too high to make them viable. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 04:14, October 3, 2014 (UTC)
- They only have level 60 Def and they are magic. So wouldn't Mage vs Mage be on Neutral weakness? Puretppc (talk) 20:30, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
- You could always give it a try, and let us know the result ;) . IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 04:02, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
- They only have level 60 Def and they are magic. So wouldn't Mage vs Mage be on Neutral weakness? Puretppc (talk) 20:30, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Chinning?[]
Are Red Chinchompas a viable option here? The area-of-effect ranged damage seems like it would be super useful since they gang up on you.
174.135.81.255 07:03, March 14, 2016 (UTC)