RuneScape Wiki
("Image:" to "File:")
Line 5: Line 5:
 
has got to be the most short sighted freaking idiotic move that i have ever seen. New players wanting to reference this will want to start at step one, not step 2 (the (e) version, hello). EVEN WORSE, was not even bothering to clean up the links afterwards, with tons of articles referencing BOTH versions of the amulet and with BOTH links pointing to the same Upgraded version of the amulet, words cannot describe the way i feel when i see such extreme short-sightedness, let alone what i feel after cleaning up the mess (and yes it's not perfectly cleaned, but it's damn well 95% better than the mess that was left behind for the past month) ''unfreaking believable'' {{Signatures/kytti khat}} 21:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 
has got to be the most short sighted freaking idiotic move that i have ever seen. New players wanting to reference this will want to start at step one, not step 2 (the (e) version, hello). EVEN WORSE, was not even bothering to clean up the links afterwards, with tons of articles referencing BOTH versions of the amulet and with BOTH links pointing to the same Upgraded version of the amulet, words cannot describe the way i feel when i see such extreme short-sightedness, let alone what i feel after cleaning up the mess (and yes it's not perfectly cleaned, but it's damn well 95% better than the mess that was left behind for the past month) ''unfreaking believable'' {{Signatures/kytti khat}} 21:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
   
I agree.--'''''<span style="background:cyan"><span style= "Border:1px solid black">[[Image:Armadylhelmet.png‎|Armadyl Helm‎]][[User:Klay king61|<span style="color: black;">Long Live Armadyl</span>]][[Image:Armadylhelmet.png‎|Armadyl Helm‎]]</span></span>''''' 22:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
+
I agree.--'''''<span style="background:cyan"><span style= "Border:1px solid black">[[File:Armadylhelmet.png‎|Armadyl Helm‎]][[User:Klay king61|<span style="color: black;">Long Live Armadyl</span>]][[File:Armadylhelmet.png‎|Armadyl Helm‎]]</span></span>''''' 22:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 
'''Agreed''' {{Signatures/Bruxacosmica}} 01:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 
'''Agreed''' {{Signatures/Bruxacosmica}} 01:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
   

Revision as of 03:07, 13 October 2010

Does the Salve amulet inflict any effect on the Barrows brothers? Fperez28 11:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

moving this article from it's original location to redirect it to the upgraded version

has got to be the most short sighted freaking idiotic move that i have ever seen. New players wanting to reference this will want to start at step one, not step 2 (the (e) version, hello). EVEN WORSE, was not even bothering to clean up the links afterwards, with tons of articles referencing BOTH versions of the amulet and with BOTH links pointing to the same Upgraded version of the amulet, words cannot describe the way i feel when i see such extreme short-sightedness, let alone what i feel after cleaning up the mess (and yes it's not perfectly cleaned, but it's damn well 95% better than the mess that was left behind for the past month) unfreaking believable

  1. REDIRECT User:Kytti khat/sig 21:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree.--Armadyl Helm‎Long Live ArmadylArmadyl Helm‎ 22:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC) Agreed Quest point cape detail Brux Talk 01:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Stat boosts stack with Potions?

While it has been confirmed the stat boosts from the Salve Amulet do not stack with the black mask, does anyone know if the stat boosts stack with those from potions? --69.214.18.247 15:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)